Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_3834_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
15.09.2026
Размер:
13 Мб
Скачать
☆
17 May-Thurner Syndrome
https://t.me/med1917
Fig. 17.2 Digital subtraction angiographic image show­ing non opacication of left common iliac vein subse­quent to the level of common iliac arterial crossing due to venous thrombosis
Venography also helps in assessment of hemo­dynamic status of MTS through pressure gradient measurements. Iliofemoral stenosis is considered signicant with a measurement of >2mm Hg at rest and more than 3mm Hg during strenuous work.
The main drawbacks of ascending venography are that it is time-consuming and invasive and cannot be performed in patients with widespread iliofemoral DVT, and post-procedural complica­tions such as phlebitis may occur [
17].
Venography also provides information toward chronicity of lesion as well as variable congenital features that may be associated, e.g., duplicated or rudimentary venous system [21].
The accuracy of this technique can be further improved by taking two or three projections dur­ing injection phase since in pancaked vein (i.e., externally compressed in anteroposterior plane), it will not exhibit diameter narrowing in the AP view [22]. It is equally effective to perform hand injection venography through the access sheath rather than using a power injector.
187
17.12 Intravascular Ultrasound
This modality can be used for diagnosis as well as a valuable adjunct for treatment of MTS.It has high sensitivity and specicity (>98%) [23]. It helps in detecting the precise morphology of the spur and thus can determine the severity and dis­tribution of pathology. It is useful for determin­ing vessel diameter, aiding stent placement, and ensuring full stent expansion.
17.13 Treatment
The treatment of MTS depends on whether deep vein thrombosis is present or not. If DVT is not pres­ent and patient is having mild symptoms, the treat­ment is conservative, and compression stockings are sufcient enough in relieving the symptoms.
For advanced non-thrombotic MTS with severe symptoms of chronic venous insufciency, e.g., limb swelling, pain, and skin discoloration, treatment is focused toward reducing the severity of the stenotic venous lesion using angioplasty and stenting the affected segment. Angioplasty if done alone is associated with high recurrence rates [24]. Recurrence rates in case of stenting depends upon type of stent used [25].
If MTS is associated with venous thromboem­bolism, treatment is initiated with full therapeutic anticoagulation unless contraindicated. Further treatment requires decreasing the volume of thrombus using catheter-directed thrombolysis or pharmacomechanical thrombolysis. The underly­ing venous stenosis is evaluated, and if present, angioplasty and stenting of the given iliocaval segment are done.
With successful treatment, chances of post­thrombotic syndrome get reduced to <10%, but if no treatment is provided, the chances of occurrence of postthrombotic syndrome go as high as 80–90%. After successful intervention for symptomatic MTS, the patient is prescribed to use knee or thigh high compression stockings (30–40mm Hg).
Patients having DVT, after intervention, are kept on therapeutic anticoagulation. The dosing, monitoring, and duration of anticoagulation are
188
https://t.me/med1917
S. Khanna and A. K. Khanna
as per VTE guidelines [26]. If stenting has been performed and bleeding risk is low, then anti­platelet therapy is given [27]. If thrombolysis is contraindicated, a common femoral venotomy is performed to remove the thrombus [21]. If endo­vascular therapy fails, then open surgery is indi­cated [28].
The open surgery is done by dissection of the iliac vein from the overlying iliac artery, open thrombectomy, and possible patch angioplasty of the left iliac vein and may need adjunctive proce­dures, such as an arteriovenous stula to enhance ow in the diseased vein [24].
If iliac vein is occluded, then surgical options include cross-femoral venous bypass (Palma­Dale procedure) [29] and femorofemoral or ileoileal prosthetic bypass, and femorocaval and aortic elevation may be done [30].
To assist long-term patency of the bypass grafts or reconstructed veins, an arteriovenous stula is often created which is ligated after 6weeks.
Complications of endovascular therapy may lead to jailing the contralateral common iliac vein which can cause thrombosis, rupture of iliac vein, migration or displacement of stent, and erosion of stent into overlying artery.
17.14 Ecacy ofEndovenous
Therapy
With the development of minimally invasive techniques and devices, the endovenous tech­niques have become treatment of choice in treat­ing iliofemoral stenotic lesions and for decreasing the long-term consequences of venous outow obstructions [31]. Even in cases with challenging anatomy, endovascular treatment has proved to be safer and has higher patency rates in cases of iliac vein stenosis [32].
It has been noted by reviewing of various stud­ies that catheter-directed thrombolysis has shown to have more thrombus resolution and reduced risk for postthrombotic syndrome as compared to the anticoagulation treatment alone.
References
1. Virchow R.Ueber die Erweiterung kleinerer Gefäfse. Arch Pathol Anat Physiol Klin Med. 1851;3:427.
2. Shebel ND, Whalen CC.Diagnosis and management of iliac vein compression syndrome. J Vasc Nurs. 2005;23:10–7.; quiz 18–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
jvn.2004.12.001
3. Brazeau NF, Harvey HB, Pinto EG, Deipolyi A, Hesketh RL, Oklu R.May-Thurner syndrome: diag­nosis and management. Vasa. 2013;42:96–105.
https://doi.org/10.1024/0301-1526/a000252.
4. Burke RM, Rayan SS, Kasirajan K, etal. Unusual case of right-sided May-Thurner syndrome and review of its management. Vascular. 2006;14:47.
5. Moudgill N, Hager E, Gonsalves C, et al. May­Thurner syndrome: case report and review of the literature involving modern endovascular therapy. Vascular. 2009;17:330.
6. May R, Thurner J.The cause of the predominantly sinistral occurrence of thrombosis of the pelvic veins. Angiology. 1957;8:419.
7. Marston W, Fish D, Unger J, Keagy B.Incidence of and risk factors for iliocaval venous obstruction in patients with active or healed venous leg ulcers. J Vasc Surg. 2011;53:1303.
8. Hurst DR, Forauer AR, Bloom JR, Greeneld LJ, Wakeeld TW, Williams DM.Diagnosis and endovas­cular treatment of iliocaval compression syndrome. J Vasc Surg. 2001;34:106–13. https://doi.org/10.1067/
mva.2001.114213.
9. Ibrahim W, Al Safran Z, Hasan H, Zeid WA. Endovascular management of May-Thurner syndrome. Ann Vasc Dis. 2012;5:217–21. https://doi.
org/10.3400/avd.cr.12.00007.
10. Patel NH, Stookey KR, Ketcham DB, Cragg AH. Endovascular management of acute extensive iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis caused by May­Thurner syndrome. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2000;11:1297–
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1051-0443(07)61304-9.
302.
11. Wolpert LM, Rahmani O, Stein B, Gallagher JJ, Drezner AD.Magnetic resonance venography in the diagnosis and management of May-Thurner syn­drome. Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2002;36:51–7.
doi.org/10.1177/153857440203600109.
12. Kibbe MR, Ujiki M, Goodwin AL, Eskandari M, Yao J, Matsumura J.Iliac vein compression in an asymp­tomatic patient population. J Vasc Surg. 2004;39:937–
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2003.12.032.
43.
13. McDermott S, Oliveira G, Ergül E, Brazeau N, Wicky S, Oklu R. May-Thurner syndrome: can it be diag­nosed by a single MR venography study? Diagn Interv Radiol. 2013;19:44–8. https://doi.org/10.4261/1305-
3825.DIR.5939-12.1.
14. Liu Z, Gao N, Shen L, Yang J, Zhu Y, Li Z, Si Y.Endovascular treatment for symptomatic iliac vein compression syndrome: a prospective consecutive
.
https://
17 May-Thurner Syndrome
https://t.me/med1917
189
series of 48 patients. Ann Vasc Surg. 2014;28:695–
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2013.05.019.
704.
15. Lensing AW, Prandoni P, Brandjes D, etal. Detection of deep-vein thrombosis by real-time B-mode ultraso­nography. N Engl J Med. 1989;320:342.
16. Labropoulos N, Borge M, Pierce K, Pappas PJ.Criteria for dening signicant central vein steno­sis with duplex ultrasound. J Vasc Surg. 2007;46:101.
17. Lamba R, Tanner DT, Sekhon S, McGahan JP, Corwin MT, Lall CG.Multidetector CT of vascular compression syndromes in the abdomen and pel­vis. Radiographics. 2014;34:93–115.
org/10.1148/rg.341125010
18. Chung JW, Yoon CJ, Jung SI, Kim HC, Lee W, Kim YI, Jae HJ, Park JH. Acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis: evaluation of underlying anatomic abnormalities by spiral CT venography. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2004;15:249–56.
RVI.0000109402.52762.8D.
19. Oguzkurt L, Tercan F, Pourbagher MA, Kizilkilic O, Turkoz R, Boyvat F.Computed tomography ndings in 10 cases of iliac vein compression (May-Thurner) syndrome. Eur J Radiol. 2005;55:421–5.
org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2004.11.002.
20. Gurel K, Gurel S, Karavas E, Buharalıoglu Y, Daglar B. Direct contrast-enhanced MR venography in the diagnosis of May-Thurner syndrome. Eur J Radiol. 2011;80:533–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
ejrad.2010.04.033.
21. Meissner MH, Gloviczki P, Comerota AJ, etal. Early thrombus removal strategies for acute deep venous thrombosis: clinical practice guidelines of the Society for Vascular Surgery and the American Venous Forum. J Vasc Surg. 2012;55:1449.
22. Birn J, Vedantham S. May-Thurner syndrome and other obstructive iliac vein lesions: meaning, myth, and mystery. Vasc Med. 2015;20:74.
23. DeRubertis BG, Lew W, Jabori S, et al. Importance of intravascular ultrasound imaging during percutane-
.
https://doi.org/10.1097/01.
https://doi.
https://doi.
ous treatment of May-Thurner syndrome. J Vasc Surg. 2012;56:580.
24. Mickley V, Schwagierek R, Rilinger N, etal. Left iliac venous thrombosis caused by venous spur: treatment with thrombectomy and stent implantation. J Vasc Surg. 1998;28:492.
25. Gloviczki P, Lawrence PF.Iliac vein stenting and con­tralateral deep vein thrombosis. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2017;5:5.
26. Jaff MR, McMurtry MS, Archer SL, et al. Management of massive and submassive pulmo­nary embolism, iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis, and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hyperten­sion: a scientic statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2011;123:1788.
27. Kearon C, Akl EA, Comerota AJ, etal. Antithrombotic therapy for VTE disease: antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis, 9th ed: American college of chest physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest. 2012;141:e419S.
28. Hartung O, Benmiloud F, Barthelemy P, etal. Late results of surgical venous thrombectomy with ilioca­val stenting. J Vasc Surg. 2008;47:381.
29. Palma EC, Esperon R.Vein transplants and grafts in the surgical treatment of the postphlebitic syndrome. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 1960;1:94.
30. Dale WA, Harris J. Cross-over vein grafts for iliac and femoral venous occlusion. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 1969;10:458.
31. Binkert CA, Schoch E, Stuckmann G, etal. Treatment of pelvic venous spur (May-Thurner syndrome) with self-expanding metallic endoprostheses. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 1998;21:22.
32. O’Sullivan GJ, Semba CP, Bittner CA, et al. Endovascular management of iliac vein compres­sion (May-Thurner) syndrome. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2000;11:823.
Nutcracker Syndrome
https://t.me/med1917
AjaySavlania andShivanesanPitchai
18
18.1 Introduction
Left renal vein (LRV) compression between the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) and abdominal aorta is referred to as the nutcracker phenomenon (NCP) or LRV entrapment and was rst described by anatomist Grant in 1937 [1]. Abdominal aorta and superior mesenteric artery (SMA) act as two arms of a ‘nutcracker’ that can potentially com­press the left renal vein [2]. The term nutcracker syndrome (NCS) is the clinical presentation of this phenomenon which is assigned to those patients who present with signs or symptoms of left renal venous congestion and have the anatom­ical LRV compression [3]. De Schepper, a Belgian physician named this phenomenon as ‘nutcracker syndrome’ [4]. Anatomically classical anterior nutcracker syndrome, in which there is compres­sion of distal LRV between aorta and proximal SMA, is analogous to superior mesenteric artery syndrome (Wilkie’s syndrome) wherein the third part of duodenum gets compressed anteriorly by SMA and posteriorly by aorta [5–10]. The ret­roaortic or circumaortic renal vein may get com­pressed between the aorta and the vertebral body causing symptom which is called posterior nut-
A. Savlania (*) Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Trivandrum, India
S. Pitchai Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute for Medical Sciences and Technology, Trivandrum, India
cracker syndrome [11]. NCP on the right side, due to compression of large veins by the gravid uterus, has been also reported [12].
A case of concurrent anterior and posterior NCS affecting circumaortic left renal vein (col­lar) where the anterior tributary of LRV com­pressed between the aorta and the SMA, while the posterior tributary of LRV compressed between the aorta and the vertebral column has been described [13].
18.2 Anatomy inRelation
toNutcracker Compression ofRenal Vein
The left-sided renal vein is 5–9 cm long and
2.5–3 times the length of the right renal vein. It starts from the left renal hilum and receives tribu­taries of the left adrenal gland and left gonadal, ureteral and sometimes lumbar veins before draining into the inferior vena cava between T12 and L2 [14–16].
The angle of origin normally between the superior mesenteric artery and the abdominal aorta is approximately 90°. The left renal vein (LRV) usually passes in front of the aorta through the crotch formed by superior mesenteric artery and the abdominal aorta. Superior mesenteric artery origin from the aorta makes a unique con­guration, so that SMA has a 4–5mm course in the anterior direction before taking downward
© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018 A. K. Khanna, R. Jindal (eds.), Venous Disorders, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1108-6_18
191
192
https://t.me/med1917
A. Savlania and S. Pitchai
direction thus forming conguration of an inverted J. This distinctive anatomy prevents compression of the left renal vein in the aorto­mesenteric window. In contrast, patients with nutcracker syndrome have superior mesenteric artery origin from aorta at angle less than 90°, which makes aortomesenteric window narrow due to steep descent of SMA from aorta leading to compression of the LRV distally and left renal vein hypertension proximally. This is termed as anterior nutcracker syndrome [17]. The retroaor­tic left renal vein is an anatomical variant which makes LRV susceptible to compression between the aorta and the vertebral column leading to left renal venous hypertension. This is termed as pos­terior nutcracker syndrome [18].
18.3 Pathophysiology
The anomalies of both superior mesenteric artery and left renal vein have been implicated in causa­tion of NCS.Anatomically critical factors in rela­tion to the superior mesenteric artery include acute angle associated with abnormally low or anterolateral origin from the abdominal aorta. Venous anatomical variants noted in cases of NCS include retroaortic course of the left renal vein or circumaortic left renal vein. Abnormal dorsal ptosis of the left kidney with secondary stretching of the left renal vein over the aorta and high course of the left renal vein has also been cited as possible factors which can contribute to compression of LRV [19]. Excessive brotic tis­sue around the origin of the SMA can also con­tribute to the compression of the left renal vein [20]. LRV compression is aggravated by the standing position because of the weight of the bowel and may be underestimated in imaging carried out in the supine position (CT, MR angi­ography). Lower body mass index has been shown to correlate with increased incidence of NCP probably due to reduced retroperitoneal fat which in turn reduces the angle between SMA takeoff and aorta [13].
Venous compression induces LRV hypertension and development of collateral pathways with vari­ceal dilatation of tributaries, which causes the symptoms. Beinart etal. described normal gradient
of pressure between LRV and inferior vena cava is less than 1mmHg [21]. The gradient of pressure between the LRV and inferior vena cava may increase up to 3mmHg due to compression by the SMA leading to rupture of thin-walled septum between the small veins and the collecting system in the renal fornix leading to haematuria [22]. It has also been postulated that haematuria may be the result of communication between dilated venous sinuses and adjacent renal calices [23].
18.4 Clinical Features
Nutcracker syndrome occurs more commonly in females, and age group affected ranges from childhood to seventh decade, but most cases are reported in second to fourth decades of their lives.
The most commonly reported symptom is hae­maturia and is due to elevated venous pressure which leads to rupture of thin-walled varices into the collecting system. It varies from micro- to macro-haematuria, occasionally resulting in anae­mia that may require blood transfusions [24, 25].
Abdominal or ank pain is the second most common symptom, which may radiate to the pos­teromedial region of the thigh or gluteal region. The pain can be exacerbated by sitting position, standing position, walking or riding on a bicycle [26, 27]. Flank pain due to left ureteric colic can occur because of the passage of clots in the ureter.
Left renal vein hypertension is the usual cause of varicoceles [28]. The compression of LRV is noticed in 50–100% of patients with varicocele, although not every patient with varicocele will have distended LRV [29, 30] . Varicosities in rela­tion with distended LRV can be noticed around the renal calyces, renal pelvis and ureter and some­times at the gluteal or vulvar region [31, 32]. Large variceal veins can be picked up on pelvic and abdominal duplex or venography [33]. Symptoms that changes with position change are hallmark of NCS and should be correlated with duplex sonog­raphy [34–37]. Nutcracker phenomenon usually becomes more prominent in standing than supine positions because of visceral proptosis and acute angulation of aortomesenteric angle (the angle between the aorta and the SMA) [38].
18 Nutcracker Syndrome
https://t.me/med1917
Orthostatic proteinuria is seen in some 14% of patients where albumin in urine appears in stand­ing position and minimal to no protein excretion seen in supine position [39]. Nutcracker syndrome has also been reported to be associated with chronic fatigue syndrome in few patients [40].
Nutcracker syndrome with venous reux in pelvic collaterals may lead to pelvic congestion. This group of patients may have dysuria, dyspa­reunia, dysmenorrhoea, increased polycystic changes in the ovaries and variations in venous duplex waveform while performing Valsalva manoeuver. Most patients have associated pelvic varicoceles. Patients of pelvic congestion syn­drome up to 10% were found to have nutcracker syndrome. In some patients, gonadal vein ow interruption improves symptoms, but gonadal veins may act as main outow vessels, and so their ow interruption may increase NCS symp­toms [26, 30, 31].
It is not clear why some patients with NCP which are incidentally detected on imaging, and in cases with even ligated LRV [15], remain asymptomatic, whereas others have symptoms.
18.5 Diagnosis
18.5.1 Duplex Scanning
193
Fig. 18.1 Ultrasonography of the upper abdomen in transverse section showing the classical compression of LRV in aortomesenteric window (white arrows), and size of proximal LRV is almost ve times that of narrowed portion
ciated pelvic congestion syndrome. Duplex scan has sensitivity and specicity of 78% and 100%, respectively, when ow reversal in the collateral veins is included in the diagnostic criteria. In NCS both distended and non-distended left renal vein can exist, and even normal ow can also exist in distended LRV.The ability to assess colour ow in collateral veins also aids in diagnosis of the nut­cracker syndrome [33].
Duplex assessment should be the rst choice for evaluation, as it is a noninvasive modality. A duplex scan (Fig.18.1) should be performed after overnight fasting and bre-free diet on the previ­ous day of imaging. The viscerorenal arteries bear­ing segment of abdominal aorta must be examined via horizontal, sagittal sections, and most impor­tantly LRV diameter and peak systolic velocity in LRV should be measured in transverse section. In nutcracker syndrome, left renal vein stenosis at the aortomesenteric window is considered signicant only if the diameter specically anteroposterior of the LRV on the left side of the aorta is ve times than that of stenotic region and if the peak systolic velocity (PSV) at the stenotic segment is ve time higher than the PSV measured at the hilum of the left kidney [41] (Fig.18.1). The examiner should also look for collateral pathways, particularly for reux in the left gonadic vein in the cases of asso-
18.5.2 Computerised Tomographic andMagnetic Resonance Angiography
Computerised tomography angiogram is a nonin­vasive imaging modality, which offers multipla­nar imaging for assessment. Portal venous phase of CT angiography should be used, which clearly shows the status of left renal vein and delineates its relationship with the surrounding structures. Magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) can provide the same information and has the advan­tage of avoiding exposure to radiation.
CT angiogram (CTA) ndings can include LRV compression between the SMA and the abdominal aorta (aortomesenteric window) with proximal dilatation of the vein (Fig.18.2) and the presence of left kidney hilar region varicose veins
194
https://t.me/med1917
Fig. 18.2 CT angiogram abdomen, transverse section, reveals the compression of LRV between SMA anteriorly and aorta posteriorly. Red arrows marking the compressed area
and collateral pathways. In posterior nutcracker syndrome, the vein follows a posterior course to aorta (retroaortic), and CTA may show compres­sion of LRV between aorta and lumbar vertebra. CTA can show acute angle takeoff by SMA from the aorta and can have a relatively low or antero­lateral origin, and the space between the SMA and the aorta at the level of the left renal vein crossing is reduced [42]. A classical triangular narrowing of the LRV at the aortomesenteric por­tion, named beak sign of the LRV, can be useful in diagnosis of the noncompensated nutcracker syndrome [43].
18.5.3 Phlebography andRenocaval Gradient
A. Savlania and S. Pitchai
gradient by pullback technique between the left renal vein and vena cava should be >3mmHg to clinch the diagnosis of NCS which is otherwise in normal situation is <1mmHg [21].
18.6 Urology Evaluation forHaematuria
Haematuria in NCS, which is often microscopic in presentation, mandates urological evaluation. Urine microscopy and urine culture should be performed to rule out glomerular cause and infec­tious aetiology of haematuria. Urologic assess­ment can include cystoscopy to locate haematuria to left ureter and exible ureterorenoscopy or even renal biopsy. Andrianne et al. described a preoperative technique, in which clamping of the renal vein is followed by appearance of immedi­ate reversible gross haematuria. Haematuria provocation test by percutaneous technique has also been proposed, which can be performed dur­ing conventional phlebography by temporarily occluding LRV in preoperative evaluation for formal diagnosis of this syndrome in suspected patients [44].
18.7 Other Investigations
The platelet counts and coagulation prole should be checked. Other causes of haematuria as urinary tract, tuberculosis and bilharziasis should be ruled out.
Left renal vein phlebography can be performed by percutaneous technique using femoral vein or bra­chial vein access under local anaesthesia. Phlebography with renocaval pressure gradient assessment is considered as propitious in estab­lishing the nal diagnosis of NCS. Left renal venous phlebography allows visualisation of the point of LRV compression at the mesoaortic win­dow with stasis of dye or delayed clearance of dye and also shows venous collaterals in perirenal and periureteral region with reux into the gonadal and adrenal tributaries. The renocaval pressure
18.8 Dierential Diagnosis
It is often challenging to diagnose NCS; all other causes of haematuria and ank pain should be ruled out before diagnosing NCS.Differential diagnosis includes glomerulonephritis, urinary tract infection, renal calculi, primary varico­cele, pelvic congestion syndrome due to other causes, vascular malformation, endometriosis and musculoskeletal problems causing ank pain.
18 Nutcracker Syndrome
https://t.me/med1917
195
18.9 Indications forIntervention
The proper correlation between the degree of the LRV compression and severity of the symptoms is lacking. Hence for optimal results of endovas­cular or surgical management of NCS, selection of the patient for intervention is of prime impor­tance. The interventions are considered only if there is severe and intractable symptoms or fail­ure to respond after conservative management, which some authors recommend a period of 2 years of conservative approach for patients aged <18years and for a duration of 6months in case of adults [17, 45, 46] .
18.10 Treatment
Management of the nutcracker syndrome has evolved over the last ve decades. The available options can be categorised as:
1. Surveillance
2. Endovascular management: (a) Stenting (b) Embolisation of gonadal veins
3. Surgical management: (a) Renal vein transpositioning/reimplantation (b) Other procedures—renal autotransplanta-
tion, renal vein bypass, etc.
18.10.1 Surveillance
Conservative management is generally advocated in young patients (<18 years) especially when patients present with microscopic haematuria, short-lived intermittent episode of painless gross haematuria, insignicant pain or atypical symp­toms. General advice is to encourage weight gain so that the retroperitoneal fat increases which may decrease the posterior renal ptosis thereby reducing the tension over the renal vein. With physical growth, an increase in brofatty tissue around the takeoff of the SMA may also relieve the LRV compression. The conservative approach should be favoured up to a period of 2years fol-
lowing detection of problem in young patients below 18years. Nearly 75% of patients respond to conservative approach probably due to physi­cal development [ Mayo Clinic, Reed etal. reported a 30% success in decreasing LRV compression by non­intervention approach with stress given on weight gain to increase the fat in retroperitoneum [48]. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibi­tors have been shown to be benecial in patients with NCS having orthostatic proteinuria [49].
47]. In another series from
18.10.2 Endovascular Treatment
Endovascular management of NCS is gaining acceptance recently mainly due to advantage of being minimally invasive and associated with least morbidity and mortality. With experience gained in treating various venous occlusive con­ditions such as May-Thurner syndrome, Budd­Chiari syndrome and superior vena caval obstruction, the same principle is applied in treat­ing NCS.First described by Neste etal. in 1996, it has become more appealing than the traditional open surgical treatment [50]. The procedure is done via femoral access. A wide and long self­expanding stent (10–20 mm in diameter and 40–70mm in length) is preferable. The stent is deployed from the rst division of the renal vein and extended into IVC, to reduce the chance of stent migration. Post-procedural gradient is measured. Around 3–6-month period of dual antiplatelet followed by single-antiplatelet ther­apy is usually advised although few authors pre­fer initial treatment with anticoagulation.
Other endovascular options include embolisa­tion of the left gonadal vein or other tributaries of the LRV especially in patients presenting with isolated varicocele or pelvic congestion syn­drome. In patients with pelvic congestion syn­drome and demonstrable pelvic varicoceles, embolisation of ovarian veins may provide sig­nicant symptomatic improvement in 56–98% of patients [27]. Although good results have been reported in the literature [51], this technique occludes the main (and symptomatic) collateral
196
https://t.me/med1917
A. Savlania and S. Pitchai
outow pathways and thus could lead to worsen­ing of the obstruction with resultant aggravation of renal symptoms.
18.10.3 Surgical Management
Surgical treatment should be guided by symp­tomatic nature of disease entity rather than mere presence of nutcracker phenomenon, because of the poor correlation between imaging evidence of NCP and symptoms [17, 46]. Since the basic pathology is compression of the LRV, any direct procedures on the LRV are likely to be most ef­cacious with least risk to other structures.
Ever since the rst procedure reported by Pastershank [9], multiple techniques of surgical management have been reported of varying surgi­cal complexity to resolve the problem, but the most commonly used procedure is left renal vein direct reimplantation into the inferior vena cava below the normal anatomical opening to prevent direct com­pression in acute angle of aortomesenteric window. To date, LRV reimplantation is the surgical method of choice as reported by Mayo Clinic group [52].
Procedure ofLRV Transposition
The surgical procedure of choice has been trans­position of the LRV caudally into the inferior vena cava. The procedure is performed through a midline laparotomy, transperitoneal approach. The small and large bowels are packed away, and retroperitoneum is opened in midline, inferior to the transverse mesocolon between duodenum on right side and inferior mesenteric vein on left side. The LRV is completely mobilised after dis­secting from brofatty tissue all around. The left adrenal vein is routinely ligated and divided to facilitate LRV mobilisation. The gonadal vein can be ligated in patients with varicocele, and descending lumbar vein can be ligated selec­tively, if necessary. The patient is systemically heparinised by unfractionated heparin 1 mg/kg dose with target activated clotting time of 250s, a side-biting clamp applied on the IVC across the LRV conuence and the LRV transected with a mini-cuff of IVC and re-anastomosed to the left lateral aspect of the caudal portion of IVC in an end-to-side tension-free manner with continuous or interrupted sutures of 4.0 or 5.0 polypropylene (Fig.18.3). The proximal opening in the IVC is
SMA
LRA
LRA
LRV
SMA
LRV
Fig. 18.3 Image showing the most commonly done surgery in NCS, the reimplantation of left renal vein in caudal segment of inferior vena cava in end-to-side fashion
18 Nutcracker Syndrome
https://t.me/med1917
197
oversewn with continuous sutures of 4.0 or 5.0 polypropylene. Other adjuncts used in this proce­dure include saphenous vein patch, vein cuff or combination of patch and cuff. These adjuncts either enlarge the renal vein (e.g. vein patch) thereby reducing anastomotic narrowing or lengthen the vein (e.g. vein cuff) thereby facilitat­ing tension-free anastomosis [52]. LRV transpo­sition can also be done via laparoscopy as reported by Hartung etal. [53]. But being a tech­nically difcult procedure and requiring a signi­cant learning curve, laparoscopic repair did not gain widespread acceptance and is limited to cen­tres of excellency. Early complications of the LRV transposition are thrombosis of the LRV, bleeding, chylous ascites and postoperative ileus. Delayed complications of anastomotic stenosis and recurrence of symptoms have been reported.
Other Surgical Procedures
Various other surgical procedure have been described for treating NCS, which includes renal autotransplantation, SMA transposition, gonado­caval bypass, spleno-renal bypass, aortic transpo­sition, renopexy, external stenting, nephrectomy, etc. Renal autotransplantation involves nephrec­tomy and transplantation of the kidney into either ipsilateral or contralateral iliac fossa as in live donors. It offers maximum efcacy in terms of normalisation of renal venous congestion, but it is a more invasive and complex surgery (requir­ing three anastomosis) when compared with the other procedures [54, 55].
In gonadal vein transposition technique, the left gonadal vein is transected and reimplanted into IVC. It drains not only the left kidney but also decompresses the pelvic congestion, so especially indicated when associated with pelvic varices with high-pressure gradient. But this pro­cedure did not receive much appreciation, and only a limited literature is available [26]. Superior mesenteric artery transposition entails transec­tion of the SMA at its junction with the abdomi­nal aorta and re-anastomosis to the abdominal aorta at a lower level away from the left renal vein. But since this procedure entails high risk for mesenteric ischemia, it is generally not preferred [56]. Laparoscopic spleno-renal bypass was reported by Chung and Gill in a symptomatic
young female with NCS with complete resolu­tion of the symptoms [57]. Barnes etal. described an external stenting procedure wherein an exter­nally supported PTFE graft was wrapped around the LRV [58]. But due to lesser invasive endovas­cular stenting, this procedure is no longer per­formed now.
18.10.4 Long-Term Results
Gloviczki etal. from Mayo Clinic in their experi­ence with LRV transposition (with or without adjuncts) in 36 patients showed complete resolu­tion of symptoms in 87% of them. Primary, pri­mary assisted, and secondary patencies at 2years were 74%, 97% and 100%, respectively. Freedom from reintervention at 1 and 2years were 76% and 68%, respectively [52]. Hohenfellner etal. reported 88% success after the open surgical treatment, but the reintervention was required in 24% patients because of stenosis/occlusion. However secondary patency was 100% in this series [59].
Chen et al. published the largest series of endovascular treatment of NCS which included 61 patients with midterm and long-term out­comes. In their series almost majority of the patients showed resolution of symptoms with follow-up ranging from 6months to 72months [60]. Similarly Wang et al. reported near­complete resolution of symptoms in 30 patients with NCS managed with endovascular stenting with mean follow-up of 3years [61].
Even though the results are attractive, the main complications associated with LRV stent­ing are stent migration, in-stent stenosis, erosion and vein occlusion resulting from bromuscular hyperplasia, thrombosis or fracture. The reported incidence of these complications is very rare [19]. Stent migration into right atrium requiring open surgical management has been reported [60]. Cohen etal. reported one case of stent com­pression by the SMA at 18-month follow-up which needed an open surgical reconstruction [62]. Despite the fact that this technique is mini­mally invasive, further studies will be required to establish its role in the management of nutcracker syndrome.