Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5923_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
15.09.2026
Размер:
14 Мб
Скачать
☆
Smart Drug Delivery Systems
41
https://t.me/med1917
of oncology. The main objective of these nanodevices is to avoid the adverse drug reaction, decrease unwanted side effects as well as reducing cytotoxicity during chemotherapy. Further, these newer drug delivery systems will reduce dose fre­quency due to the nature of their controlled and sustained release or preprogramed drug release pattern in different time intervals, so that these nanodevices enhance therapeutic efficacy as well as reach in therapeutic range for recovery of the patients. Due to very small or nanosize they can easily entrap by malignant cells due to nature of leaky vasculature of basement membrane and so therefore easily applicable for passive targeting. Ligand molecules such as antibody or aptamer can be attached to the surface of nanocarrier so that they can easily recognize the tumor cells or may be applied for active targeting purposes.
Several researches have been carried out by using various anticancer drug loaded nanocarriers and has been studied for cellular uptake in different cancer cell lines via passive and active targeting. It is important to note that several nano drug delivery systems should apply for approval via clinical trial and may be started in commercial use of human beings in future field of cancer treatment. This may be beneficial for minimizing the cytotoxicity as well as enhance the pharmaceutical elegance for human health care.
– Futuristic Window in Cancer Therapy
Nanomedicine for Targeted Drug Delivery in Cancer Chemotherapy DOI: http://ITexLi.114066
References
42
https://t.me/med1917
[1] Zaki El-Readi M, Ahmad Althubiti M.
Cancer nanomedicine: A new era of successful targeted therapy. Journal of Nanomaterials. 2019;:13 pages
[2] Sutradhar KB, Amin L.
Nanotechnology in Cancer Drug Delivery and Selective Targeting. ISRN Nanotechnology. 2014;:12 pages
[3] Yao Y, Zhou Y, Liu L, Xu Y, Chen Q ,
Wang Y, et al. Nanoparticle-based drug delivery in cancer therapy and its role in overcoming drug resistance. Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences. 2020;(Article
193):1-14
[4] Deng Y, Zhang X, Shen H, He Q ,
Wu Z, et al. Application of the nano­drug delivery system in treatment in cardiovascular disease. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology. 2020;(Article 489):1-18
[5] Mirza AZ, Siddiqui FA. Nanomedicine
and drug delivery: A mini review. International Nano Letters. 2014;:94
[6] Hou S, Hasnat M, Chen Z,
Liu Y, Muhammad M, et al. Application perspectives of nanomedicine in cancer treatment. Frontiers in Pharmacology. 2022;:1-14
[7] Tewabe A, Abate A, Tamrie M,
Seyfu A, Siraj FA. Targeted drug-delivery form magic bullet to nanomedicine: Principles, challenges, and future perspectives. Journal of Multidisciplinary Health Care. 2021;:1711-1724
[8] de Martel C, Georges D, Bray F,
Ferlay J, Clifford GM. Global burden of cancer attributable to infections in 2018: A worldwide incidence analysis. The Lancet Global Health. 2020;(2):e180-e190
[9] Hamed KM, Ibrahim M, Dighriri IM,
Baomar AF, Alharthy BT, Alenazi FE. Overview of methotrexate toxicity: A comprehensive literature review. Cureus. 2022;(9):e29518
[10] Verma P, Chandra U, Shukla P,
Verma SP, Suvirya S. Reticular skin rash as an adverse effect of 5-azacitidine. Cureus. 2022;(4):1-4
[11] Medepalli LC, Mahmood TS,
Liberman H, Medepalli AM, Bagwell TW. Diagnosis and management of a patient with 5-fluorouracil-induced st elevation and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia as a late presentation of cardiotoxicity and successful 5-fluorouracil. Cureus. 2022;(10):e30489
[12] Rizvis AA, Saleh AM. Applications
of nanoparticle system in drug delivery technology. Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal. 2018;:64-70
[13] Cheng Z,Li M,Dey R,
Chen Y. Nanomaterials for cancer therapy: Current progress and perspectives. Journal of Hematology & Oncology. 2021;:85
[14] Salapa J, Bushman A, Lowe K,
Irudayaraj J. Nano drug delivery systems in upper gastrointestinal cancer therapy. Nano Convergence. 2020;:38
[15] Charbgoo F, Nikkhah M,
Behmanesh M. Size of single-wall carbon nanotube affects the folate receptor mediated cancer cell targeting. Biotechnology and Applied Biochemistry. 2018;:328-337
[16] HeidariKhoee M, Khoee S, Lotfi M.
Synthesis of titanium dioxide nanotubes with liposomal covers for carrying and extended release of 5-Fu as anticancer
Smart Drug Delivery Systems – Futuristic Window in Cancer Therapy
43
https://t.me/med1917
drug in the treatment of hela cells. Analytical Biochemistry. 2019;:16-24
[17] Narmani A, Mohammadnejad J,
Yavari K. Synthesis and evaluation of polyethylene glycol-and folic acid conjugated polyamidoamine G4 dendrimer as nanocarrier. JournalofDrug DeliveryScience and Technology. 2019;:278-286
[18] Wu P, Hwang K,Lan T, Lu Y.
Gold nanoparticle probe for uranyl ion in living cells. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2013;(14):5254-5257
[19] Probst CE, Zrazhevskiy P, Bagalkot V,
Gao X. Quantum dots as a platform for nanoparticle drug delivery vehicle design. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews. 2013;(5):703-718
[20] Matea C, Mocan T, Tabaran F.
Quantum dots in imaging drug delivery and sensor applications. International Journal of Nanomedicine. 2017;:5421-5431
[21] Vasudevran D, Gaddam RR,
Trinchi A, Cole I. Coreshell quantum dots: Properties and applications. Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 2015;:395-404
[22] Ya J, Li P, Li L, Yang M. Biochemistry
and biomedicine of quantum dots: From biodetection to bioimaging, drug discovery, diagnostics, and therapy. Acta Biomaterialia. 2018; :36-55
[23] Fymat AL. Determining optimum
period of withholding irrigation for inducing maturity (Saccharum spp. hybrid) in Southern Ethiopia. Journal of Applied Biotechnology & Bioengineering. 2020;(1):16-25
[24] Mukherjee B, Mondal L, Dey NS,
Chakraborty S, Maji R, et al. Nanoscale formulations diagnostics with their
recent trends: A major focus of future nanotechnology. Current Pharmaceutical Design. 2015;(36):5172-5186
[25] Zacheo A, Bizzarro L, Blasi L,
Piccirillo C, Cardone A, Gigli G, et al. Lipid-based nanovesicles for simultaneous intracellular delivery of hydrophobic hydrophilic and amphiphidic species. Frontiers inBioengineering andBiotechnology. 2020;:690
[26] Sakolov AV,Kostin NN,
Ovchinnikova LA, Lomakin YA, Kudriaeva AA. Targeted drug delivery in lipid-like nanocages and extracellular vesicles. Acta Naturae. 2019;:28-41
[27] Satapathy BS, Mukherjee B,
Baishya R, ChatterjeeDebnath M, Dey NS, Maji R. Lipid nanocarrier-based transport of docetaxel across the blood brain barrier. RSC Advances. 2016;:85261-85274
[28] Dey NS. Mechanistic approach
ofnano carriers for targeted in cancer chemotherapy: A newer strategy for novel drug delivery system. Polymers. 2022;(2321):1-17
[29] Al-jubori AA,Ghassan M,
Sulaiman GM, Tawfeeq AT, Hamdoon A, Mohammed HA, et al. Layer-by-layer nanoparticles of tamoxifen and resveratrol for dual drug delivery system and potential triple-negative breast cancer treatment. Pharmaceutics. 2021;:1098
[30] Dey NS, Mukherjee B, Maji R,
Satapathy BS. Development of linker­conjugated nanosize lipid vesicles: A strategy for cell selective treatment in breast cancer. Current Cancer Drug Targets. 2016;(4):357-372
[31] Varshosaz J, Farzan M.
Nanoparticles for targeted delivery of therapeutics and small interfering RNAs in hepatocellular carcinoma. World Journal of Gastroenterology. 2015;(42):12022-12041
Nanomedicine for Targeted Drug Delivery in Cancer Chemotherapy DOI: http://ITexLi.114066
[32] Senapati S, Mahanta AK, Kumar S,
44
https://t.me/med1917
Maiti P. Controlled drug delivery vehicles for cancer treatment and their performance. Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy. 2018;(7):1-19
[33] Zhu R, Lang T, Yin Q , Li Y. Nano
drug delivery systems improve metastatic breast cancer therapy. Medicina em Revista. 2021;(2):244-274
[34] Maji R, Dey NS,Satapathy BS,
Mukherjee B. Preparation and characterization of tamoxifen citrate loaded nanoparticles for breast cancer therapy. International Journal of Nanomedicine. 2014;:3107-3118
[35] Allahou LW, Madani SY,
Seifalian A. Investigating the application of liposomes as drug delivery systems for the diagnosis and treatment of cancer. International Journal of Biomaterials. 2021;, Article ID 3041969, 16 pages
[36] Sim S, Wong NK. Nanotechnology
and its use in imaging and drug delivery. Biomedical Reports. 2021;:42
imaging diagnosis and drug delivery. Accounts of Chemical Research. 2021;:3313-3325
[41] Veroniaina H, Wu Z, Qi X. Innate-
tumor targeted nanozyme overcoming tumor hypoxia for cancer therapeutic use. Journal of Advanced Research. 2021;:201-213
[42] Cheng X, Fan K, Wang L, Ying X,
Sanders AJ, Guo T, et al. TfR1 binding with H-ferritin nanocarrier achieves prognostic diagnosis and enhances the therapeutic efficacy in clinical gastric cancer. Cell Death & Disease. 2020;:92
[43] Guo Z, Zhang Y, Fu M, Zhao L,
Wang Z, Xu Z, et al. The transferrin receptor-directed CAR for the therapy of hematologic malignancies. Frontiers in Immunology. 2021;:652-924
[44] Iqbal H, Yang T, Li T, Zhang M,
Ke H, Ding D, et al. Serum protein based nanoparticles for cancer diagnosis and treatment. Journal of Controlled Release. 2021;:997-1022
[37] Yu W, Liu R, Zhou Y, Gao H. Size-
tunable strategies for a tumor targeted drug delivery system. ACS Central Science. 2020;:100-116
[38] Zafar H, Raza F, Ma S, Wei Y,
Zhang J, Sheu Q. Recent progress on nanomedicines-induced ferroptosis for cancer therapy. Biomaterials Science. 2021;:5092-5115
[39] Wei Y, Gu X, Sun Y, Meng F,
Storm G, Zhang Z. Transferrin-binding peptide functionalized polymersomes mediate targeted doxorubicin delivery to colorectal cancer in vivo. Journal of Controlled Release. 2020;:407-415
[40] Song N, Zhang J, Zhai J,
Hong J, Yuan C, et al. Multifunctional nanoplatform for biological detection
[45] Candelaria PV,Leoh LS,
Penichet ML, Daniels-wells TR. Antibodies targeting the transferrin receptor 1 (TfR1) as direct anticancer agents. Frontiers in Immunology. 2021;:607-692
[46] Chung YH, Cai H, Steinmetz NF.
Viral nanoparticles for drug delivery, imaging, immunotherapy, and theranostic applications. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews. 2020;:214-235
[47] Venkataraman S, Apka P, Shoeb E,
Badar U, Hefferon K. Plant virus nanoparticle for anticancer chemotherapy. Frontiers inBioengineeringandBiotechnology. 2021;:642794
[48] Kim KR, Lee AS, Kim SM, Heo HR,
Kim CS. Virus-like nanoparticles as a
Smart Drug Delivery Systems – Futuristic Window in Cancer Therapy
45
https://t.me/med1917
theranostic platform for cancer. Frontiers inBioengineeringandBiotechnology. 2023;:1-19
[49] Lin S, Liu C, Han X, Zhong H,
Cheng C. Viral nanoparticle system: An effective platform for photodynamic therapy. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021;:1728
[50] Fulton MD, Najahi-Missaoui W.
Liposomes in cancer therapy: How did we start and where are we now. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023;:6615
[51] Salapa J, Allis BA, Lowe K,
Irudayaraj J. Nanodrug delivery systems in upper gastrointestinal cancer therapy. Nano Convergence. 2020;(7):1-17
[52] Angelova A, Angelov B,
Mutafchieva R, Lesieurs S. Biocompatible mesoporous and soft nanoarchitectures. Journal of Inorganic and Organometallic Polymers and Materials. 2015;(2):214-232
[53] Watermann A, Brieger J. Msoporous
silica nanoparticles as drug delivery vehicles in cancer. Nanomaterials. 2017;(7):1-89
[54] Dilnawaz F. Multifunctional
mesoporous silica nanoparticles for cancer therapy and imaging. Current Medicinal Chemistry. 2019;(31):5745-5763
[55] Pasqua L, Leggio A, Sisci D,
Ando S, Morellic C. Mesoporous silica nanoparticles in cancer therapy: Relevance of the targeting function. Mini-Reviews in Medicinal Chemistry. 2016;(9):743-753
[56] Hu JJ, Liun LH, Li ZY, Zhou RX,
Zhang XZ. MMP-responsive theranstic nanoplatform based on mesoporous silica nanoparticles for tumor
imaging and targeted drug delivery. Journal of Materials Chemistry B. 2016;(11):1932-1940
[57] Neamtu I, Rusu AG, Diaconu A,
Nita LE, Chiriac AP. Basic concept s and recent advances in nanogels as carriers for medical applications. Drug Delivery. 2017;(1):539-557
[58] Vicario-de-la Torre M, Forcada J.
The potential of stimuli-responsive nanogels in drug and active molecule delivery for targeted therapy. Gels. 2017;(2):16
[59] Sosnik A, Seremeta K. Polymeric
hydrogels as technology platform for drug delivery applications. Gels. 2017;(3):25
[60] Reddy N, Reddy R, Jiang Q.
Crosslinking biopolymers for biomedical applications. Biotechnology. 2015;(6):362-369
[61] Quinones JP, Peniche H,
Peniche C. Chitosan based self-assembled nanoparticles in drug delivery. Polymers. 2018;(3):235
[62] Kuperkar K, Patel D,Atanase LI,
Bahadur P. Amphiphilic block copolymers: Their structures, and self-assembly to polymeric micelles and polymersomes as drug delivery vehicles. Polymers. 2022;:4702
[63] Pawar A, Kamdi V, Alaspure A,
Gangane P. Recent updates on polymeric micelles: A review. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences Review and Research. 2022;(1):37-52
[64] Edis Z, Wang J, Waqas MK,
Ijaz M, Ijaz M. Nanocarriers-mediated drug delivery systems for anticancer agents: An overview and perspectives. International Journal of Nanomedicine. 2021;:1313-1330
Nanomedicine for Targeted Drug Delivery in Cancer Chemotherapy DOI: http://ITexLi.114066
[65] Li Z, Tan S, Li S, Shen Q , Wang K.
46
https://t.me/med1917
Cancer drug delivery in the nano era: Overview and perspectives. Oncology Reports. 2017;:611-624
[66] Clemente N, Argenziano M,
Gigliotti CL, Ferrara B, Boggio E, et al. Paclitaxel-loaded nanosponges inhibit growth and angiogenesis in melanoma cell models. Frontiers in Pharmacology. 2019;:1-13
[67] Iravani S, Verma RS. Nanosponges
for drug delivery and cancer therapy: Recent advances. Nanomaterials. 2022;:1-14
[68] Palminteri M, Dhakar NK,
Ferraresi A, Caldera F, Vidoni C, Trotta F, et al. Cyclodextrin nanosponge for the GSH-mediated delivery of resveratrol in human cancer cells. Nano. 2021;(2):197-212
[69] Lv Z, Zhu Y, Li F. DNA functional
nanomaterials for controlled delivery of nucleic acid-based drugs. Frontiers inBioengineeringandBiotechnology. 2021;:720291
[73] Chen Y, Xu P, Wu M, Meng Q ,
Chen H, et al. Colloidal RBC-shaped, hydrophilic, and hollow mesoporous carbon nanocapsules for highly efficient biomedical engineering. Advanced Materials. 2014;:4294-4301
[74] Xiao J, Duan X, Yin Q , Zhang Z,
Yu H, et al. Nanodiamonds mediated doxorubicin nuclear delivery to inhibit lung metastasis of breast cancer. Biomaterials. 2013;:9648-9656
[75] Lang T, Zheng Z, Huang X,
Liu Y, Zhai Y, Zhang P, et al. Ternary regulation of tumor microenvironment by heparanase-sensitive micelle­loaded monocytes improves chemo immunotherapy of Zhu et al.: Nano drug delivery systems metastatic breast cancer. Advanced Functional Materials. 2020;(10):2007402
[70] Ding F, Zhang H, Cui J, Li Q ,
Yang C. Boosting ionisable lipid nanoparticle mediated in vivo RNA delivery through optimization of lipid amine head groups. Biomaterials Science. 2021;:7534-7546
[71] Das CGA, Kumar VG, Dhas S,
Karthick V, Kumar CMV. Nanomaterials in anticancer applications and their mechanism of action - A review. Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology and Medicine. 2023;:102613
[72] Alieva M, van Rheenen J, MLD
B. Potential impact of invasive surgical procedures on primarytumor growth and metastasis. Clinical& ExperimentalMetastasis. 2018;:319-331
Chapter 3
47
https://t.me/med1917
Fluorescence Guided Activatable Cancer Theranostics: Its Dev
elopment and Prospect
ShayeriBiswas and SankarprasadBhuniya
Abstract
Since the prehistorical period, cancer has been a pervasive affliction in the human body, representing one of the most formidable challenges to human health and well-being. Its insidious presence in the human body commands the highest mortality rate among those who succumb to its grasp. Epigenetic factors often play a critical role as the primary caretakers orchestrating the transformation from an innocuous, rudimentary stage to the formidable and often fatal metastasis phase. In the battle against this lethal illness, the concept of theranostics was embraced in the early twenty-first century, combining both treatment and diagnostic techniques. This prompt data on treatment methods could pave the way for the advancement of tailored medicine, potentially curbing medication misuse as well. The use of fluo­rescence as a partially invasive method has been adapted for diagnostic purposes in the field of intelligent medicine. Within this approach, the overexpression of unique elements (ROS, thiols, enzymes, proteins, etc.) within cancer cells facilitates the cleavage of the theranostic agent, resulting in the immediate release of drugs exclu­sively in cancer cells. This approach rapidly offers temporal data on the activation of therapies and their effects at the subcellular level in animal models, as demonstrated through in situ biopsies.
Keywords: endogenous stimulators, theranostics, prodrug, fluorescence, cancer
. Introduction
Cancer represents a potentially life-threatening condition within human society, with its various types categorized based on their origin and location [1]. Alterations in the genes responsible for cellular signaling, particularly the malfunctioning of protein kinases, can lead to the growth of cancer [2]. The unveiling of the human genome sequence has spurred the development of novel treatment protocols for this ailment.
In 2004, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) promoted the exploration of innovative products for cancer treatment, specifically emphasizing personalized medicine to mitigate drug misuse and encourage targeted therapy. The pharmaceuti­cal industry views the “Trojan horse” approach, in conjunction with therapeutic and diagnostic tools, as a potential solution for precise treatment. The term “theranostic”
Smart Drug Delivery Systems – Futuristic Window in Cancer Therapy
48
https://t.me/med1917
was initially coined by John Funkhouser, the Chief Executive Officer of PharmaNetics, in 1998, and has since become a widely searched keyword in cancer research.
Parallel advancements in chemistry, biotechnology, nanotechnology, pharmacy, medicine, and imaging have led to the continual development and assessment of theranostic nanomedicine and its clinical significance in recent years [3]. Engineered nanoparticles and devices have been crafted to meet the current demands for person­alized treatment. Research in the realm of theranostic tools for cancer treatment has resulted in the development of various anticancer drugs and carriers, such as poly­mers, liposomes, and diverse nanoparticles.
In the initial stages of theranostic nanomedicine development before 2005, thera­peutic and diagnostic tools were incorporated into polymer vehicles that passively entered the target site due to the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect. Subsequently, theranostic nanomedicines were devised with specific ligands capable of targeting particular cancer types based on their genetic signatures or the expression of specific proteins in tumor cells. This approach capitalizes inherent variance between normal and cancer cells to enhance cancer cell-specific uptake. The technologies behind targeted theranostic nanocarriers have exhibited desirable improved proper­ties at the treatment site, localizing specifically to affected areas, providing targeted therapeutic release, and enabling noninvasive monitoring with diagnostic tools [4].
While targeted therapy has demonstrated effective therapeutic efficacy, various imaging modalities, including magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), positron emission tomography (PET), ultrasound, fluorescence, and computed tomography, have shed light on the underlying disease mechanisms and facilitated assessment in pre-and post-treatment stages [5–9].
Newly developed materials, including upconversion nanoparticles, graphene­based nanodevices, and other theranostic prodrugs, have been introduced as innova­tive solutions to address various forms of sporadically mutated cancer. Contrarily, the primary obstacle lies in surpassing the limitations of imaging for seamless in vivo visualization. Ultimately, the overall aim of nanomedicine is to fulfill the objective of providing personalized medicine [10].
Considerable efforts have been dedicated to the creation of theranostic tools, although most of these tools rely on nanoparticle technology. Regrettably, none of the existing nanoparticles are capable of offering real-time insights into the process of drug release and its activation. Currently, advanced techniques, such as small molecu­lar optical-modulated theranostics, appear to be resolving this issue and instilling confidence in tailoring suitable treatments for individual patients. These newer methodologies, particularly those involving ROS-activatable systems, enzymes, and similar agents, facilitate the precise delivery of therapeutic agents to specific tumor regions [11]. In this approach, chemotherapeutic agents are linked to a tumor-guiding group via a self-immolative linker, allowing them to enter tumor tissues and activate within. The structural framework of these systems is relatively straightforward, compact, reproducible, and biocompatible, enabling easy modifications to achieve the desired effectiveness in chemotherapy and displaying enhanced cellular uptake, making them preferred candidates for chemotherapy compared to nano-theranostics. Discussions within the review encompass the causes of cancer formation and their variant, early drug development and delivery strategies, the design approaches of small conjugate-based theranostics, the underlying mechanisms of drug activation, and various imaging techniques used for precise cancer diagnosis. The review is structured to explore diagnostic methods and the mechanisms involved in activating theranostics at the tumor site.
Fluorescence Guided Activatable Cancer Theranostics: Its Development and Prospect DOI: http://ITexLi.115104
. Cancer formation and their properties
49
https://t.me/med1917
Cancer is characterized by the fundamental anomaly of unregulated cell growth
across various cell types. This irregularity is manifested through the modification of normal cellular signaling pathways, invasion into healthy cells and tissues, and eventual dissemination throughout the body, often in the form of metastasis.
Essentially, modifications in epigenetics profoundly influence the expression
of genes, which serves as the inception of cancer [12]. Gene mutations are greatly impacted by changes in DNA, including modifications like DNA methylation and hydroxymethylation, as well as alterations in histone acetylation, histone methyla­tion, and variations in small noncoding RNAs. Consequently, these changes give rise to unregulated cell division, ultimately resulting in the expansion of tumor cell population which originate from a single clone. Frequently, cancer-causing substances, including arsenic and its derivatives, asbestos, benzo(a)pyrene, polyaromatic, dimethylnitrosamine, nickel compounds, and others harm the DNA, leading to gene mutations. These altered genes foster the invasion of tumors and diminish the function of tumor suppressor genes [13]. Apart from the cancer-causing agents, tumor growth stimulants are also triggered during the initial phase of cancer prognosis through the activation of protein kinase C induced by phorbol ester [14]. Furthermore, epigenetic suppression entails an overabundance of methylation on the DNA repair protein O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT), resulting in the deactivation of MGMT for DNA repair, a process frequently observed in cancerogenesis. Within cancer cells, micro-RNAs, a type of noncoding RNA comprising around twenty bases, bind to messenger RNAs, leading to their degradation or the inhibition of translation. This process significantly influences the growth and spread of numerous cancer types [15].
The unrestricted proliferation of cancer cells leads to numerous alterations in
cellular communication, the cell cycle, cell adhesion, and the extracellular matrix. Typically, the growth pattern of normal cells is tightly regulated, with density­dependent inhibition restricting further cell growth, overseen by cell growth regula­tors. However, during the progression of cancer cells, the phenotype of extracellular growth factor receptors changes, and the density-dependent inhibition process becomes ineffective. Occasionally, cancer generates fresh growth factors to promote unregulated growth, a process known as autocrine growth stimulation, making it independent of the usual growth factors that regulate the growth of normal cells [16]. Consequently, cellular growth signaling varies in cancer cells, where the intracellular signaling pathway is disrupted by the deactivation of growth factor receptors or other critical proteins, such as Ras proteins or protein kinases [17].
The adhesion between cells and their attachment to the matrix is notably weaker
in cancer cells. Within these cells, the primary adhesion function of E-cadherin in cell-matrix interactions is compromised, resulting in decreased activity. Receptors responsible for cell-cell attachment are downregulated, while those associated with cell motility are upregulated. Additionally, this process stimulates the activation or over­expression of surface metalloproteases, leading to the degradation of the extracellular matrix. This degradation facilitates the movement of cells with mesenchymal traits, which is crucial for metastasis. Also, increased secretion of collagenase has enhanced the capacity of carcinomas to break down and penetrate basal laminae, facilitating the invasion of underlying connective tissue. Moreover, the heightened expression of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors fosters the creation of fresh blood vessels.
Importantly, within tumor cells, the process of apoptosis, which typically serves
as a tightly controlled mechanism for cell death in the development and sustenance
Smart Drug Delivery Systems – Futuristic Window in Cancer Therapy
50
https://t.me/med1917
of a normal cell population in mature organisms, is also disrupted. Anomalies in the apoptosis process are also a prominent characteristic of carcinogenesis. In certain types of cancer, the natural intrinsic apoptosis pathway is hindered by regulators like X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein (XIAP) and the B-cell lymphoma 2 family of proteins [18]. Similarly, the proteins FLIPL and FLIPS also impede alternative extrin­sic pathways [19].
Numerous notable distinctions between cancer and normal cells contribute to their accelerated growth rates and enhanced migratory capabilities.
. Anticancer drugs and delivery
During the sixteenth-century, the pioneering physician Paracelsus was among the first to utilize medicine and minerals in the treatment of cancer. Up until 2020, the FDA had approved approximately 89 medications intended for the treatment of cancer [20]. These medications are categorized as alkylating agents, antimetabolites, anthracyclines, plant alkaloids, microtubule inhibitors or modulators, topoisom­erase inhibitors, chromosome binding agents, and other antitumor treatments. These drugs exhibited anticancer effects by causing DNA fragmentation, inhibiting topoisomerase activity, and inducing apoptosis through different mechanistic path­ways. In more than 90% of instances, chemotherapy is prescribed with the primary goal of providing palliative care, aiming to either stabilize the disease or enhance the patient’s quality of life. Regrettably, the limited rate of drug accumulation within cancer cells is insufficient to manage the rapid growth of tumors effectively. Therefore, combination therapy might be more effective in controlling the swift and proliferative cancer growth. Nonetheless, the intrinsic heterogeneous characteristics and hypoxic conditions significantly disrupt the effectiveness of anticancer drugs in chemotherapy. Even during advanced stages, various factors such as multidrug resis­tance, changes in drug activation mechanisms, detoxification, activation of cellular efflux, and delayed apoptosis further diminish the anticancer efficacy of chemo­therapy [21]. The idea of drug delivery emerges as a means to expand the therapeutic window, which is presently limited. In general, micro/macro encapsulated particles, polymer-bound micro drug delivery systems, and prodrug-linked low molecular weight drug delivery systems are frequently utilized. Ligand-receptor interaction­based targeted delivery system is the key strategy behind the effective transport of chemotherapeutics agents to the cancerous region. Generally, integrin-binding RGD peptide, folic acid, monoclonal antibody, glycoside, D-biotin, and similar substances are commonly employed for targeting different forms of cancer [22, 23]. Several thousand publications concerning drug delivery systems illustrate their internaliza­tion through either receptor-ligand interaction within the endocytosis pathway or passively through the concept of the enhanced permeable retention (EPR) effect. These endeavors are essential from the standpoint of patient care, reducing drug misuse, and minimizing mortality.
. Theranostics and importance of self-immolative linker
The ongoing management of cancer in the modern era motivates the develop­ment of inventive protocols for delivering anticancer drugs, aiming to enhance the therapeutic window. In light of this, the concept of theranostics emerges in the