Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5644_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
15.09.2026
Размер:
14 Мб
Скачать
☆
(a)
https://t.me/med1917
(b)
Figure 6.8 (a) Chemical structures of ligands 26–28 identified with InfoRNA. (b) Primary and secondary structures of pre-miR-210 and part of pri-miR-96.
136 6 MicroRNAs as Targets for Small-Molecule Binders
https://t.me/med1917
in vivo to evaluate its therapeutic potential. This molecule selectively recognizes pre-miR-210 in both cases and showed biological activity inducing cell apoptosis in vitro and tumor growth reduction in vivo.
Using the same kind of approach, a compound specic for the inhibition of the production of miR-18a, a miRNA belonging to the miR-17-92 cluster and overexpressed in prostate cancer, was identied. This compound (30, Figure 6.9) strongly and specically interacts with pre miR-17, -18a, and -20 in a U, G, or A bulge regions, all three located in the catalytic site of Dicer [67]. Treatment of prostate cancer cells with this ligand, called Targapremir-18a, showed inhibition of miR-18a production, restoration of the expression of the tumor suppressor protein serine/threonine kinase 4 (STK4), and induction of apoptosis. The study of the cellular targets of Targapremir-18a was pursued using the Chem-CLIP (Chemical Cross-Linking and Isolation by Pull Down) technique [68]. This approach is based on the combination of a specic RNA ligand with a chemical scaold capable of covalently binding to RNA (most common are chlorambucil or diazirines [high­lighted in green in compound 31, Figure 6.9]). Furthermore, a chemical handle allowing the subsequent isolation of the complex is added to the compound and is generally represented by biotin (highlighted in orange in compound 31, Figure 6.9). The resulting probe molecule will bind to the RNA target followed by covalent bond formation whereupon the ligand/target complex can be isolated with magnetic beads coated with streptavidin. The RNA target can subsequently be isolated and identied by RT-qPCR. In the case of TargapremiR-18a 31, specic binding to the miR-18a precursor could be conrmed as the primary target, with pre-miR-17 and
-20a as secondary targets.
Other oncogenic miRNAs have been targeted using the same approach. After demonstrating both in vitro and in vivo that it is possible to inhibit miRNA bio­genesis by using small molecules to target the Drosha or Dicer cleavage sites, the Disney group studied additional miRNAs including miR-544, which is upregulated in tumor cells in response to hypoxia [69]. Compound 32 bearing a naphthyridine scaold substituted with amines, pyrrolidines, and a cyano group, was identied by Inforna as the most eective against this target. This compound inhibits the action of Dicer and has similar eects to ASOs at 25-fold lower concentrations. This inhibitor also conrmed a biological role for miR-544 in apoptosis resistance, tumor growth, and chemotherapy resistance, making it a prime target for cancer therapy [69]. Compound 33, consisting of an azido-neomycin, decreases the level of miR-525 in vivo through action on the pri-miR-525, and by binding to the Drosha catalytic site [70]. This miRNA is particularly overexpressed in liver cancers indicating its therapeutic importance as it inhibits the invasive properties of a hepatocellular carcinoma cell line. Although this molecule can bind to a large number of cellular RNAs, only binding to sites such as the Drosha catalytic site for miR-525 allows a biological response. A relevant example of the potential of the InfoRNA approach in the design of miRNAs inhibitors is the discovery of compound 34 that specically interacts with a UA double base pair of pre-miR-200c and of compound 35 that interacts with an internal UU loop adjacent to the UA base pairs [71]. MiR-200 family associated with type 2 diabetes includes ve distinct
Figure 6.9 Chemical structure of ligands 30–36 discovered by InfoRNA and specific for a particular structure of pre-miRNA. The conjugation of 34 and
https://t.me/med1917
35 led to new ligand 36, highly specific for pre-miR-200c.
138 6 MicroRNAs as Targets for Small-Molecule Binders
https://t.me/med1917
members, but overexpression of miR-200c is sucient to induce β-cell apoptosis. The combination of 34 and 35 resulted in ligand 36 that is highly specic for miR-200c compared to the other members of the same family.
Collectively, these examples illustrate that while pure rational design remains a challenge, tools are available to facilitate design of specic compounds. Fur­thermore, these tools are continually evolving to further enable design of ecient binders. Compounds exhibiting high specicity for a chosen miRNA precursor induced the desired biological eect. Furthermore, such compounds also represent important chemical tools to elucidate the role of miRNAs in cancer and other related pathologies. Based on these considerations, other classical medicinal chemistry strategies have been developed for the targeting of miRNAs with small molecules as it will be described in the following sections.
6.4.2.4 Fragment-Based Drug Design
The same medicinal chemistry approaches commonly used for the discovery of compounds targeting proteins can be employed for the identication of RNA binders specic for a particular structure. In this context, fragment-based drug design (FBDD) has recently been utilized to nd RNA binders that target miRNA precursors such as those illustrated in the previous sections [72]. FBDD involves screening of libraries of fragments, which are compounds with low molecular weight (generally <300 Da) and with low number of functionalities. The aim is to identify small chemical scaolds that can bind to a target of interest, often with low anity and/or activity. Following validation of target binding through orthogonal biophysical techniques, these fragment hits are subsequently optimized by addition of substituents (fragment growing) or linking two fragments with a close binding site on the target (fragment linking) leading compounds with high anities and activities. NMR is a frequently employed technique for fragment-based screening since it allows for assessment of anity and identication of the binding sites. NMR was recently applied to the search for fragments that inhibit the biogenesis of miR-21 upon binding to pre-miR-21 [73]. A screen of 420 compounds led to the identication of 18 hits. After rening the screen and validating the identied hits, thiadiazole fragment 37 (Figure 6.10) was demonstrated to bind in close proximity
Figure 6.10 Compounds 37, 38 discovered using a fragment-based drug design approach, and compounds 39, 40 discovered using InfoRNA as probes for the development of fragment screening.
6.4 Targeting MicroRNAs with Small-Molecule RNA Binders 139
https://t.me/med1917
to the Dicer cleavage site on pre-miR-21. Further assays would be needed to assess the actual biological activity of this kind of compound, but it represents a starting point for the development of new ligands targeting this oncogenic miRNA.
Advanced FBDD was then performed combining this approach with InfoRNA. This latter approach, described in the previous section, has been applied to the screening of fragment libraries [74]. The largest collection of RNA-focused small-molecule fragments to date (n = 2500) was created by examining features in all published compounds that bind RNA. The most relevant interactions between fragments and RNA were identied. Approximately 12.8 million interactions were found by examining the RNA-binding landscape for each fragment following a library-versus-library selection using an RNA library displaying a discrete structural feature. Mining of this dataset across the human transcriptome led to the identica­tion of a drug-like fragment (compound 38 in Figure 6.10) as a potent and specic inhibitor of miR-372 biogenesis, thus alleviating invasive and proliferative onco­genic phenotypes in gastric cancer cells. Noteworthy, 38 has favorable properties, including favorable anity for the RNA target of 300 ± 130 nM, a molecular weight of 273 Da, and quantitative estimate of drug-likeness (QED) score of 0.8. Thus, these studies demonstrate that a low-molecular-weight, fragment-like compound can specically and potently modulate RNA targets.
InfoRNA allowed for the identication of compound 39 that binds in the Dicer cleavage site of pre-miR-21 [75]. To develop a methodology for fragment screening, compound 40 was prepared by addition of a diazirine group for the photoactivated capture of bound RNA targets and a terminal alkyne handle that can be bioorthogo­nally coupled to an azide-containing purication tag through click chemistry. Eval­uation of pre-miR-21 binding by 40 was performed using the ChemCLIP approach conrming that the binding site was similar to 39. A fragment library of compounds containing the diazirine and the alkyne moieties were then generated, and the appli­cation of the same strategy allowed for the identication of several fragments able to bind pre-miR-21. The combination of these fragments produced a particular active compound with increased potency to inhibit pre-miR-21 processing and to decrease the levels of mature miR-21. In triple-negative breast cancer cells, the substance had selective eects on the transcriptome and reduced an invasive phenotype linked to miR-21.
6.4.2.5 DNA-Encoded Libraries (DELs)
The use of DNA-encoded libraries (DELs) in drug discovery has already led to successful results and led to the discovery of new drug candidates currently in clinical trials. However, only recently has this technology been applied to the search for RNA binders. In a relevant example, a screen of a DNA-encoded library against a library of RNA structures enabled the evaluation of 300 million interactions in total and resulted in identication of numerous ligand/target pairs [76]. Among them, ligands specic for the 5′-GAG/3′-CCC internal loop present in an oncogenic primary miRNA (pri-miR-27a) were identied. Compound 41 (Figure 6.11) has nanomolar binding anity for the target, decreased miR-27a expression in four dierent cancer cell lines at nanomolar concentrations, and exhibits high selectivity across miRnome in triple-negative breast cancer cells.
140 6 MicroRNAs as Targets for Small-Molecule Binders
https://t.me/med1917
Figure 6.11 Chemical structure of ligand 41 identified using DELs.
Similar to FBDD, DEL screening approaches have high potential for the identi­cation of novel RNA binders that exhibit the desired specicity. While only few examples have been reported to date, these techniques are surely extremely promis­ing and will probably lead to bioactive compounds in the near future.
6.5 Inhibition of RNA–Protein Interactions in miRNAs Pathways
Beside direct binding of RNA binders to one of the miRNAs precursors, it is also possible to target the interactions formed between miRNAs and miRNA precur­sors with the partner proteins essential for miRNA functions. Abell et al. designed oligonucleotide-small-molecule conjugates to inhibit the interaction between the miRNA–Ago2 complex and mRNA [77]. The goal of such conjugates is the specic recognition of the miRNA target by the oligonucleotide moiety, which will guide the small-molecule inhibitor of Ago2 close to the targeted protein. The designed compounds contain a short oligonucleotide sequence (tetramer) complementary to miR-122 linked to an Ago2 inhibitor (compound 42, Figure 6.12) that was identied by an in silico screen of 627,000 compounds. Optimization of these conjugates led to the synthesis of compounds 43 and 4 4 containing a miR-122-specic 5′-TCAC-3 peptide nucleic acid (PNA) tetramer. Fluorescence assays to evaluate the ability of
′
Figure 6.12 Compounds inhibiting the interaction between Ago2 and miRNA (42–46) and between Lin28 and pre-Let-7 (47, 48).
6.5 Inhibition of RNA–Protein Interactions in miRNAs Pathways 141
https://t.me/med1917
the conjugates to inhibit miRNA–Ago2 interaction with mRNA as well as its cleavage were performed. These conjugates thus revealed a ten-fold higher IC50than the PNA tetramer sequence alone, demonstrating the potential of such a strategy to inhibit miRNA functions. Liang et al. employed a conjugation strategy to inhibit pre-miR-21 cleavage by Dicer [78, 79]. In this study, the compounds were obtained by conjuga­tion of two types of oligonucleotides (morpholino or PNA) of dierent lengths and a 2-hydroxy-isoiquinoline-1,3-dionemotif (molecule 45, Figure 6.12), previously iden­tied as a weak inhibitor of Dicer [79]. Such molecules can be used because oligonu­cleotides allow vectorization and provide an increasein local eective concentration. Biological evaluation of the dierent conjugates was performed by electrophoresis and led to the identication of the bifunctional molecule 46 containing an 11-mer PNA with a GAGATTCAACA sequence specic to the apical loop of pre-miR-21. This conjugate inhibits pre-miR-21 cleavage by Dicer with an IC50of 0.5 μM com­pared to 100 μM for the Dicer inhibitor alone. Although the use of shorter ASOs compared to oligonucleotides may provide benets in terms of specicity and cellu­lar distribution, the bifunctional molecules in this study are not cell permeable and require further optimization.
Another important interaction that has been considered in miRNA-targeting studies is the one between the miRNA-binding proteins LIN28 and let-7 [80]. Let-7 miRNAs function as a tumor suppressor by downregulating the expression of oncogenes including RAS, c-MYC, HMGA2 [81]. LIN28 is a post-transcriptional regulator protein that binds to pri- and pre-let7, thus blocking let-7 maturation and inducing its degradation. Many primary human tumor cells overexpress LIN28, and this has been connected to poor clinical prognosis. Inhibition of LIN28/pre-let-7 interaction is thus considered a potential anticancer approach, and various studies reported small-molecule inhibitors of this interaction [82]. Recently, Wu and coworkers identied tetrahydroquinoline (THQ) as a weak inhibitor of LIN28 and decided to perform the medicinal chemistry optimization of this scaold [83]. This led to compounds 45, 4 6 having low micromolar IC50for LIN28 inhibition but devoid of intracellular activity. Despite this drawback, only few examples of LIN28 inhibitors have been reported so far and these remain promising scaolds for future medicinal chemistry improvements.
Recently, new specic assays are being developed to identify novel compounds that inhibit RNA/protein interactions. The eld includes RNA interaction with protein-mediated complementation assay, or RiPCA [84]. In this assay, cells are engineered to express the small subunit of the split luciferase, NanoLuc, fused to HT, an engineered dehalogenase that covalently binds to chloroalkane-containing lig­ands leading to a fusion protein SmHT. The cells are then transiently co-transfected with a plasmid encoding the RBP-of-interest fused to the large subunit of NanoLuc and a chloroalkane-modied RNA probe, which allows covalent conjugation to SmHT. Subsequent interaction between the RBP and RNA drives reconstitution of NanoLuc, generating chemiluminescence upon treatment of cells with the NanoLuc luciferase substrate. This assay was used to prove the interaction of
142 6 MicroRNAs as Targets for Small-Molecule Binders
https://t.me/med1917
a pre-miRNA, pre-let-7, with Lin28 and was particularly useful to detect this interaction intracellularly. This methodology could thus be employed in the future to screen for inhibitors of this interaction.
6.6 Adding Cleavage Properties to miRNAs Interfering Agents
As illustrated by all the examples above, small-molecule binders of miRNA precur­sors proved to be ecient tools to inhibit the intracellular expression of pathological miRNAs and sometimes also to induce the desired eect in vivo. A step further in the search for ecient miRNA inhibitors is to introduce additional properties to ligands that not only bind to the target, but also induce its degradation and cleavage in cells and eventually in vivo. In a rst attempt to nd compounds able to bind an RNA target and induce its cleavage, bleomycin A5 (compound 49, Figure 6.13), a natural product known to induce DNA and RNA strand breaks and used as an anticancer agent, was studied as a binder and cleaving agent on dierent RNA motifs and struc­tures [85]. It was shown that bleomycin A5 preferentially cleaves motifs containing A-U base pairs as well as purine-rich sequences. In vitro and in vivo assays were car­ried out on pre-miR-10b, which contains these motifs and is an oncogenic miRNA that is overexpressed in many cancers and involved in invasion and metastasis. All assays conrmed the action of the compound on the intended target. Bleomycin was then employed to introduce cleavage properties to other specic pre-miRNA lig­ands. As a typical example, targaprimir-96 (conjugate 29, Figure 6.8) was coupled to bleomycin A5 (conjugate 50, Figure 6.13) by introducing an azido group on the sper­midine side chain and coupling using 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition reaction. This led to very ecient inhibition of Drosha processing and to the cleavage of pri-miR-96 in intracellular assays [86].
A major advance in the eld of RNA ligands in general and miRNA inhibitors in particular has been made recently with the design of chimeric compounds called RIBOTACs capable of targeting a miRNA precursor and inducing its degradation by recruitment of a ribonuclease in a manner similar to that performed on protein targets by PROTACs (described in further detail in Chapter 9) [87]. As an example, compound 29 was conjugated to a 2′-5′-poly(A) oligonucleotide capable of recruit­ing an endogenous RNase L inducing degradation of pri-miR-96 at the intracellular level and in sub-stoichiometric amounts (conjugate 51, Figure 6.13). This strategy was applied successfully to other pre-miRNAs ligands. In a relevant example, a specic ligand of pre-miR-21 (compound 52, Figure 6.13) identied with Inforna was optimized by the preparation of dimer 53 and then coupled to bleomycin or to a small-molecule compound able to recruit RNase L, leading to conjugate 54 [88]. The latter induces the degradation of pre-miR-21 at the intracellular level and in sub-stoichiometric amounts. It has 20-fold higher activity than the corresponding dimer in reducing the intracellular level of miR-21 and 10-fold higher than the bleomycin conjugate. Finally, the in vivo study of this molecule showed that cleavage of pre-miR 21 leads to inhibition of breast cancer metastasis to the lung.
Figure 6.13 Examples of conjugates able to induce the cleavage of the targeted RNA thanks to the presence of bleomycin (compounds 49, 50)ortothe
https://t.me/med1917
presence of a RNase L recruiter (compounds 51–54).
144 6 MicroRNAs as Targets for Small-Molecule Binders
https://t.me/med1917
The addition of cleavage properties to specic RNA binders thus showed to be particularly promising to induce the desired biological eect thanks to the degrada­tion of the RNA target. The synthesized conjugates may still have to be optimized for therapeutic application, but in vivo studies clearly demonstrated the potential of this strategy.
6.7 Conclusions
In conclusion, the examples of RNA ligands described in this chapter illustrate the feasibility of the approach and the possibility of obtaining specicity of action in vitro as well as at the cellular level and in vivo. miRNAs represent particularly promising targets not only for anticancer therapies, which are currently the most studied, but also for other pathologies in which these short non-coding RNAs are involved as well as for antiviral approaches. However, the miRNA network is extremely rich and complex since thousands of miRNAs have been identied, and each one controls the expression of hundreds of proteins. Modulation of this network may have important eects on the biology of the cell, and toxicity could be a major limitation of the approach based on the targeting of these RNAs. Furthermore, the miRNA precursors that usually represent the target of small-molecule miRNA inhibitors have very similar three-dimensional structures, thus limiting the possibilities for selective binding. Despite this limitation, very specic ligands have been identied showing biological activity in cells and in vivo, which encourages the scientic community to pursue this strategy. Finally, the eld of RNA ligands for therapeutic applications is broad and rapidly expanding for targeting a large number of targets such as viral, bacterial, and other eukaryotic non-coding RNAs. Altogether, the gathered results will play a major role in dening the main features for RNA binders and in opening the possibility for the rational design of ecient and specic inhibitors.
References
1 Warner, K.D., Hajdin, C.E., and Weeks, K.M. (2018). Principles for targeting
RNA with drug-like small molecules. Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery 17 (8): 547–558.
2 Falese, J.P., Donlic, A., and Hargrove, A.E. (2021). Targeting RNA with small
molecules: from fundamental principles towards the clinic. Chem. Soc. Rev. 50 (4): 2224–2243.
3 Childs-Disney, J.L., Yang, X., Gibaut, Q.M.R. et al. (2022). Targeting RNA
structures with small molecules. Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery 21: 736–762.
4 Crooke, S.T., Baker, B.F., Crooke, R.M., and Liang, X.H. (2021). Antisense
technology: an overview and prospectus. Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery 20 (6): 427–453.
5 Battiste, J.L., Mao, H., Rao, N.S. et al. (1996). Alpha helix-RNA major groove
recognition in an HIV-1 rev peptide-RRE RNA complex. Science 273 (5281):