Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_1281_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
15.09.2026
Размер:
15 Мб
Скачать
☆
Pediatric Surgical Procedures – An Updated Guide – Volume I
81
the vas and testicular vessels, divided, and followed proximally to the internal ingui­nal ring, where it is ligated with a doubly absorbable suture. The distal sac should be dilated extensively, but it is unnecessary to remove it. If a hydrocele is present, it is evacuated; however, it is not necessary to perform an excision of the hydrocele sac. In cases of large sacs, they may be everted behind the cord, which is commonly called the bottle procedure. The entire sac can be resected following high ligation in the event of a blind-ending sac. It is uncommon for minors to require formal floor restoration. Inversion ligation is comparatively straightforward to perform after the placement of a proximal purse-string suture in the presence of a sliding hernia [9].
As we have mentioned, there are many differences in the approach to hernia surgery between females and males. In females, it tends to be simpler than in males due to the absence of the necessity of preserving a spermatic cord. The process starts with the identification of the hernia sac and its inspection for contents.
The sac frequently houses the ovary, tube, or mesosalpinx. If the sac is vacant, it is divided between clamps. Following cauterization of the wound’s margins, the distal capsule is reinserted into the cut. The proximal sac is dissected out to the internal ring, contorted, and doubly ligated. The transversalis fascia is then approximated to the shelving edge of the inguinal ligament, and the internal ring is closed using one or two sutures. The inguinal ligament is then closed in the standard manner. According to a study, it is imperative to routinely expose the sac prior to twisting and liga­tion, as up to 40% of indirect inguinal hernias in females have a sliding component (
Figure ). In the event that the fallopian tube is not readily visible, certain surgeons will apply traction to the round ligament to identify the tube prior to ligating the sac. Additionally, refrain from performing the Bastianelli maneuver, which involves the routine attachment of the sac and the round ligament to the conjoint tendon to restore the uterus’s normal support [34].
No attempt should be made to dissect the fallopian tube from the sac if it is identi­fied as a sliding hernia in the sac wall. Rather, it employs a purse-string closure to close the sac above the fallopian tube, reduce the sac into the internal ring, and close the internal ring with one or two sutures, a procedure referred to as the Bevan repair [7, 46]. Open unilateral hernia correction is the standard of care for adolescents with a unilat­eral inguinal hernia; contralateral exploration protocols are unnecessary [46, 47].
Contralateral exploration is associated with risks, and not all patent processus vaginalis develop into clinically pertinent hernias; this may be considered an unneces­sary surgical risk [46, 48].
Figure 4. Incarcerated hernia in a female child.

Inguinal Hernia in Children: A Literature Review DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.115548
82
. Laparoscopic repair
Since 1975, minimally invasive surgery has been shown to be feasible and safe for pediatric patients. Laparoscopic surgery was first used to treat a small bowel obstruc­tion [49]. El-Gohary in 1997 described laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernias in pedi­atric patients [49]. Operation was initially performed only in female patients because the safety of the vas and vessels is of concern in males. Monteput and Esposito [50] were involved in the repair of inguinal hernias in male children and were the first to use laparoscopy using an intracorporeal purse-string suture to close the inguinal ring. According to a literature review by Smith et al., Schier described intracorporeal Z-suture closure first in girls only (1998) [33] and then in boys (2000) [51, 52]. Chan and Tam described intracorporeal hydrodissection as a technique to prevent damage to the vas and vessels in males [53]. Also, other modifications of the intracorporeal method include the incision of the peritoneum [54], using it to cover the patent processus vaginalis [55], or making an excision of the sac laparoscopically [56].
Prasad et al. [57] described the use of extracorporeal suturing. After that, there have been multiple changes in medical practice to make the extracorporeal suture more accessible from a technical point of view [58]. Hydrodissection has used both intracorporeally and extracorporeally [59]. The latest improvements are related to the reduction in the number of incisions required to make the surgery [60]. Diagnostic laparoscopy has been used to confirm the hernia’s presence in order to make a smaller incision for an otherwise relatively standard open repair [61].
The laparoscopic method includes several benefits. A cohort study where children underwent laparoscopic herniotomy reported similar pain scores, complications, and recurrence as open herniotomy. Similarly, they reported excellent results in the same age group, with a mean age of 19.1months in phase I and a mean age of 17.6months in phase II. In literature reports, recurrence rates are similar between the two studied laparoscopic methods [62].
Literature recommends that the patient be positioned in the Trendelenburg posi­tion. The monitor is situated at the foot of the operating table, while the surgeon and assistant are situated at the top of the table. CO2 is insufflated into the abdomen at a pressure of 5–8mmHg through an umbilical incision, and a 3-mm trocar is inserted. Two 2-mm apertures are positioned superiorly and medially to the anterior apical iliac spine in telescopic vision [63, 64].
The internal aperture of the hernia is verified by examining the contralateral side. Up to 40% of cases exhibit a contralateral patent processus vaginalis. The decision to close these during the same operation is a matter of debate, as not all of them will develop into a clinical hernia in the future, potentially exposing certain patients to superfluous operative risk. However, the majority of the parents ask for its repair [63, 64].
. Intraperitoneal purse-string closure
The secure application of a purse-string suture is facilitated by the subperitoneal injection of normal saline for boys, which separates the vas deferens and testicular vessels from the peritoneum. A laparoscopic grasper is used to lift the peritoneum that covers the testicular vessels and vas deferens [28].
The peritoneum is elevated away from the vas deferens and testicular vessels by injecting 2mL of normal saline and using either normal saline or local anesthestic to conduct hydrodissection. A needle is introduced, and the space beneath the distended peritoneum is entered under visual observation. To guarantee the appropriate

Pediatric Surgical Procedures – An Updated Guide – Volume I
83
isolation of the vas and testicular vessels from the peritoneum, saline is injected laterally around the ring and subsequently medially. The injector is subsequently withdrawn. Certain surgeons also employ a diathermy hook to diathermize or incise the collar of the hernia sac. As the literature says, this has been demonstrated in a rabbit model to produce an even more lasting repair [28].
Coran et al. [28] affirm that the technique should be implemented with a non­absorbable monofilament suture that is introduced into the peritoneal cavity by pass­ing it through the abdominal wall. The purse-string suture is initiated at the 2 o’clock position of the internal hernia opening. As they say, the needle should be observed to traverse the subperitoneal space, free of the vas and testicular vessels, with each successive bite of the peritoneum around the hernia ring.
. Burnia technique
Authors such as Mendoza et al. [65] emphasize that the burnia technique has become a very recommendable surgical treatment for inguinal hernias in girls, as its advantages offer better postoperative results, the chance to revise the contralateral inguinal canal, and also better esthetic results. Nevertheless, it is necessary for further investigation to establish it as a gold standard of surgery, as it requires extensive experience to be conducted efficiently.
According to Mendoza et al. [65], “the Burnia technique is performed with the patient in the supine position and using laparoscopic materials such as a 3.5 and
5.3mm 30° lens, as well as laparoscopic forceps and monopolar energy.” The Hasson technique is used to make a 0.5-cm incision in the umbilical region. It starts with a disposable 5-mm trocar that is used to insert the laparoscopic vision lens. CO2 is used to produce pneumoperitoneum, with different pressures correlated with the age of the patient but usually between 10 and 12mmHg. It is important to make a panning of the abdominal cavity and inguinal region to identify where the lesion is located and to assess the contralateral side. Next, a second cut is made on the right flank for a second 3-mm trocar. Then, a work clamp with a 3-mm monopolar connector is introduced to find vaginal peritoneum with the lesion. Then, the hernial sac is pulled away from the peritoneal wall with the Babcock fórceps and without content. When the procedure is finally done, the pneumoperitoneum is evacuated, and the trocars are removed under direct vision [65].
. Alternative technique
On the other hand, the flip-flap technique is an alternative approach that entails an incision in the peritoneum that is 1cm lateral to the internal inguinal ring. In the manner of a trap door, the hernia orifice is concealed by raising a flap of peritoneum and flipping it across to the internal inguinal ring. A continuous suture should be used to secure the closure of the hernia ring between the free border of the perito­neal membrane and the contiguous hernia ring. The closure of extensive hernias is achieved without tension through the use of a peritoneal membrane [21, 28].
. Extraperitoneal closure
The extracorporeal approach is about placing a suture circumferentially around the internal ring and tying the knot using percutaneous techniques. There have been many variations of this approach. Ostlie and Ponsky reviewed the literature and

Inguinal Hernia in Children: A Literature Review DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.115548
84
stated that there was insufficient evidence to support one approach over another [9]. An umbilical incision is made to introduce a 3-mm telescope into the peritoneal cavity, and pneumoperitoneum is established. Under telescopic guidance, a stab incision is made in the lower abdomen, midway between the umbilicus and suprapubic tubercle, to introduce a 2- or 3-mm grasper. Position this port on the ipsilateral side of the hernia; however, the authors consistently position it in the left lower abdomen [28].
Next, it is required to make a small stab wound just at the 12 o’clock position of the internal inguinal ring lateral to the internal inguinal ring. Utilize a 25-gauge finder needle to perform a hydrodissection by first performing it laterally and then medially through the stab incision. Inject either normal saline or a local anesthetic to separate the peritoneum from the vas deferens and testicular vessels. A deeper incision is made in the preperitoneal compartment [28].
To assist in the creation of scar tissue and increase the durability of the repair performance, thermal energy is applied through a stab incision at this point around the internal ring [28].
Place a spinal needle through the stab incision at the 12 o’clock position and pass laterally around the internal ring in the hydrodissection plane, over the cord struc­tures. Use a Maryland dissector to assist in lifting the peritoneum off the cord struc­tures while passing the spinal needle. After the spinal needle has passed over the cord structures, it should be pushed through the peritoneum into the abdominal cavity. The looped monofilament suture is then pushed out partially from the needle, and the needle is removed, leaving the suture in place [21, 28].
To access the prior hook entrance point in the peritoneum, it is recommended to re-insert the hook into the anteromedial portion of the preperitoneal region. Dissect the medial semicircle of the internal inguinal ring in the same way as previously. Back into the peritoneal cavity, the hook goes. A suture is passed through the hook’s eye. The suture will fully wrap the internal inguinal ring when the hook is with­drawn. By compressing the distal hernia sac, the pneumoperitoneum may be freed. Reintroducing pneumoperitoneum ensures that the hernia closure is airtight when the circumferential suture is knotted extracorporeally [21, 28].
. Robotic repair
Additional problems, such as a lack of instrument diversity and an adequate size for younger patients, have slowed the introduction of robotic surgery into pediatric operations. Some have voiced worries about patient safety, citing factors such as the lengthened operation time and limited access for anesthetic patients caused by the size of the robotic system. Robotic surgery has seen a significant increase in its use on juvenile patients during the last decade, despite these restrictions. Robotic pediatric surgical treatments, according to Cundy et al. [66], saw a case volume rise of over 100% between April 2011 and March 2021. The biggest increases were seen in urologic and foregut operations.
The size of the surgical robot and its equipment is the main concern highlighted by Denning et al. [67] in 2020 about robotic surgical technology in pediatric surgery. Compared to the 3-mm instruments often used in conventional laparoscopic opera­tions, the only two sizes of robotic tools that have been authorized for use in pediatrics, 8mm and 5mm, are much bigger. Additionally, a 5-mm robotic endoscope was removed due to poor usage; therefore, the only accessible diameters are 12.0mm and
8.5mm. The intercostal gap of a youngster weighing 5kg or less would be too vast for the 8.5-mm scope, even if it could be used with larger children. So, according to the da

Pediatric Surgical Procedures – An Updated Guide – Volume I
85
Vinci surgical platform maker, you should space the ports 8cm apart. Due to their tiny stature, infants and toddlers would have a hard time covering this distance [39, 68].
. Recurrent inguinal hernias
Recurrent inguinal hernias rarely represent an emergency. This allows the medi­cal professional to assess the best options for treatment. Nevertheless, it is one of the most important concerns after a primary repair. Fortunately, the rise of new tech­niques and the increasing scientific advances in the matter have allowed the medical community to choose between several approaches that include the open and laparos­copy approach [3, 10, 69–71].
Literature shows that open repair is the recommended option in cases where the recurrent hernia is concomitant to incarceration, ascended testis, sliding hernia containing the ovary, previous open intra-abdominal surgery, or if the peritoneum at the inner orifice is scarred. However, according to evidence, laparoscopy has gained in popularity for its low rates of complications related to infection. Not only represents a non-invasive procedure but also has improved the incidence of pain, hematomas, and time in the hospital. In our opinion, despite its benefits, it should be taken into account the expertise of the surgeon and the specific case of the patient [72].
. Hernia repair with mesh
In their study, Reistrup et al. said there is a lack of long-term follow-up data and data comparing mesh vs. non-mesh repairs in teenagers. In 2024, researchers looked at data from 4000 groin hernia surgeries and found that open procedures were more common and mesh was seldom employed in teenage cases. There were zero high-quality randomized controlled trials, and the majority of the research was small retrospective cohort studies with no prospective data. Both the mesh and non-mesh procedures had minimal recurrence occurrences (<2%), according to a meta-analysis. All surgical procedures seem to have a tolerable risk of chronic pain, which ranges from 0–11%. A case-based survey demonstrated that for surgeons, surgical approaches to teenagers differed depending on whether they mostly dealt with adult or pediatric patients. It seems that there is a lack of consistency in the treatment of adolescents, depending on the surgeon who is treating them. Pediatric physicians used high ligation, whereas adult surgeons employed either mesh or non-mesh procedures [73].
Due to the high recurrence incidence and inadequacy of standard hernia sac ligation surgery, Chen et al. [74] suggested a biological patch for youngsters aged 13–18. Furthermore, the posterior wall of the inguinal canal should also be repaired and strengthened in order to prevent a recurrence. At present, it is not advocated for children with hernia, from 13 to 18years old, to be treated with a non-biological synthetic patch (polypropylene) because they are still in the growth and development stage [14]. For children and adolescents, their muscle and fascia tissue will gradually become stronger as the growth and development stage. The absorbable biological materials can rely on their own characteristics to repair defects in the early stages and generate new tissue plates through tissue replacement to prevent the recurrence of hernias in the long term.
Lichtenstein, in 1984, proposed the open “tension-free” mesh repair tech­nique, which is still considered the method of choice for primary inguinal hernia. Lichtenstein hernioplasty with the biological patch was used to treat inguinal hernias

Inguinal Hernia in Children: A Literature Review DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.115548
86
in children and adolescents between 13 and 18years old. This procedure involves plac­ing a biological patch in front of the transversalis fascia to strengthen the back wall of the inguinal canal [19].
. Special cases
.. Amyand’s hernia
The standard therapy for Amyand’s hernia is appendectomy with primary hernia repair. If perforation or pelvic abscess is suspected, it is preferred to perform a lower midline laparotomy approach as it is easier to manage. In cases of gangrenous acute appendicitis, Solecki et al. suggest a midline inferior laparotomy and Shouldice’s herniorrhaphy. This is also supported by Salemis et al., who reported that during a laparoscopic approach on an indirect inguinal hernia, they discovered a gangrenous perforated appendix with peritonitis, requiring a midline laparotomy [19].
Lately, a wider range of approaches has started to show up in the published works. Vermillion et al. documented the first laparoscopic appendectomy in a case of Amyand’s hernia with appendicitis [19]. It has recently come to light that laparoscopic surgery is becoming more common, although it is needed choose an open repair approach if complications arise.
In addition, according to Ivashchuk G et al., a growing number of patients are hav­ing their Amyand’s hernias repaired with extraperitoneal management. Additionally, Saggar et al. described the comprehensive extraperitoneal therapy that included the use of synthetic mesh for hernioplasty and appendectomy [19].
.. Littré’s hernia
Littré’s hernia management is surgical, with reduction of the hernia, repair of the hernia defect, and resection of the diverticulum [75].
Management of asymptomatic and incidentally found diverticulum prophylactic resection may be pursued. Generally, resection is the management of diverticulum encountered during a routine repair of hernia, though the reasoning behind this is not elucidated [76].
.. Direct inguinal hernias
In children, direct inguinal hernias are rare, even in older teenagers. Direct and femoral hernias are often unrecognized preoperatively. Direct inguinal hernias can be managed in children and adolescents with an open McVay repair (approximation of the transversalis aponeurotic arch and internal oblique aponeurosis to the anterior ileopubic tract and shelving edge of the inguinal ligament), a Bassini approach, or with mesh [9].
Laparoscopic repair is also an attractive option for a direct inguinal hernia. However, the laparoscopic technique is different for a direct inguinal hernia repair as there is a large lipoma adherent to the hernia sac with a direct hernia. It is impor­tant to perform laparoscopically the reduction of the lipoma into the abdominal cavity, followed by excision using a hook cautery. Excision of the lipoma is one of the key points of direct repair, closure of the defect using several interrupted nonabsorbable sutures, and use of the vesical ligament to reinforce the closure of the defect without tension [9].

Pediatric Surgical Procedures – An Updated Guide – Volume I
87
It is rare to find in children combinations of direct and indirect hernias, the so-called pantaloon hernias, or even combinations of indirect, direct and femoral hernias, and the best way to identify them is the laparoscopic approach [9].
.. Femoral hernias
In the infant population, femoral hernias are rare, representing just about
0.2% of all hernias. In fact, prior to surgery, most of them were not suspected. It is even common that, due to the difficulty in identifying them with an open approach, they are sometimes misdiagnosed as indirect inguinal hernias. On the other hand, they are evenly distributed between males and females, with a mean diagnostic age of around 5–7years. The presence of a mass under the inguinal ligament and medial to the femoral vessels should serve as an alarm to the sur­geon about this potential. Femoral hernias that affect both legs occur in 10–20% of instances. However, the laparoscopic surgery reduced the risk of reoperation compared to the open repair, according to a Danish dataset that analyzed 3970 adult femoral hernia procedures. Additionally, low recurrence rates have been reported in small pediatric studies. Laparoscopic surgery is not the only option; open mesh or mesh plug repairs, as well as Cooper ligament repairs, are other viable choices [9].
. Ventriculoperitoneal shunts or peritoneal dialysis
According to Hammer et al. [77], procedures that introduce fluid into the peritoneal cavity may produce a hernia or hydrocele in patients with a patent pro­cessus vaginalis. Excess fluid in the peritoneal cavity is a major risk factor for the development of inguinal hernias as well. However, it is unclear whether increased intra-abdominal pressure or the fluid itself is what causes hernia. There could be a role for abnormal neuromuscular function as well. According to a study by Moazam and colleagues that looked at 134 patients who underwent ventriculoperitoneal shunt surgeries, 19.5% of meningomyelocele patients and 47% of intraventricular hemor­rhage patients had inguinal hernias. According to Grosfeld and Cooney, inguinal hernias occurred 14% of the time after ventriculoperitoneal shunt implantation, with 20% experiencing incarceration and 16% experiencing a recurrence of the hernia [19]. The study concluded that infants undergoing ventriculoperitoneal shunts should be closely monitored for the development of a clinical inguinal hernia due to the increased risk of incarceration, surgery should be performed immediately upon diagnosis of a hernia [4], and in patients with a unilateral hernia, the contralateral side should be investigated [5].
Patients on long-term ambulatory peritoneal dialysis have a documented risk of inguinal hernia ranging from 7 to 15%. When inserting the peritoneal dialysis catheter, it is advised to do an intraoperative herniography. After 15minutes of being in a head-up posture, the patient receives water-soluble contrast via the catheter. A repair is necessary if a patent processus vaginalis is detected. Another option is to directly see the internal ring via laparoscopy while inserting the catheter, especially if the procedure is carried out laparoscopically. Both open and laparoscopic methods of repair may thereafter be used [77].

Inguinal Hernia in Children: A Literature Review DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.115548
88
. Inherited disorders of connective tissue
Patients with inherited disorders such as Hunter-Hurler, Ehlers-Danlos, and Marfan síndromes present higher rates of inguinal hernia incidence and recurrence. However, this can be prevented by repairing the floor of the inguinal canal with ligation of the sac. In research conducted by Coran and Eraklis, it was found that 36% of the 50 patients with Hunter-Hurler syndrome developed an inguinal hernia. When the high ligation was performed alone, the recurrence rate was as high as 56%. Several studies recommend this technique be combined with floor repair with mesh [9].
. Cystic fibrosis
The prevalence of cystic fibrosis has risen by 6%, while inguinal hernia cases have surged by 15%. The occurrence of missing vas deferens in the overall population ranges from 0.5 to 1%, as indicated by research on vasectomy. Irregularities in the vas deferens in individuals with cystic fibrosis, which can vary from blockages to total absence, are always found and typically affect both sides. Consequently, if the vas deferens cannot be identified, it should prompt an assessment for cystic fibrosis. The absence of the vas deferens is linked to kidney malformation in individuals without cystic fibrosis; therefore, it is advised to assess the upper urinary system in these cases [9].
. Intersex
On very rare occasions, a phenotypic female may be genetically male suffering from androgen insensitivity syndrome or a genuine hermaphrodite. The presence of testicular tissue, sometimes called “the ovotestis,” should prompt a thorough evalu­ation of any ovary found inside a female patient’s hernia sac. Males who suffer from androgen insensitivity syndrome have smaller testis but no uterus or fallopian tubes. Upon inspection of the gonad, an asymmetric ovotestis is seen, and hermaphrodites may have a fallopian tube inside the hernia sac. It is not necessary to remove an aber­rant gonad in either case. It involves removing a little wedge-shaped piece from each pole, replacing the gonad, and fixing the hernia.
. Splenogonadal Fusión
The fusion of splenic tissue with a healthy testis is known as splenotesticular fusion. The typical preoperative diagnosis for a scrotal mass presentation is a testicu­lar tumor. Having an orchidectomy is not required; a frozen section during surgery can give the diagnosis and enable the testis to be saved. The fusion of the spleen and ovaries may also be observed. The fusion of the spleen and gonads can also manifest as a testis that has not descended or a mass within the abdomen. The use of laparos­copy is beneficial for both diagnosing and treating this ailment [9].
. Adrenal rests
Ectopic adrenal tissue is not rare and has been found in 10 of 385 operations for inguinal hernia (2.6%), an incidental finding in each case, appearing as a small mass of yellowish tissue in the apex of the hernia sac. In another series, however, the

Pediatric Surgical Procedures – An Updated Guide – Volume I
89
incidence was 0.2% in 1077 sacs analyzed. The adrenal tissue at this site is likely the result of the attachment of developing adrenal cells to the testis before descent from the retroperitoneum to the scrotum during fetal development [9].
. Postoperative care
Except for newborns who need extended time to be monitored, the majority of patients may usually be sent home within 2 hours following surgical repair. However, while newborns have no activity limitations, older kids should wait to ride bikes or engage in other strenuous physical activities until the discomfort disappears [21].
. Postoperative complications
.. Scrotal swelling
In children, scrotal edema is the most prevalent consequence that might occur after inguinal hernia surgery. Scrotal edema is a concern for caretakers and may vary in severity from patient to patient, making it a potential consequence. The scrotal edema might be due to the scrotal dissections done during surgery or to the loose areolar tissues of the scrotum. Scrotal hematoma, which occurs when blood collects in the scrotal sacs, may be caused by insufficient hemostasis after surgery [78]. Repair of a subsequent scrotal hydrocele or aspiration may be required in rare cases, although this usually goes away on its own. After the distal sac is removed, a scrotal hematoma may form [9].
.. Infection
An infrequent complication is a major wound infection; hernia surgery is a clean surgery. It is more common in cases of strangulated inguinal hernia. Obesity patients, prolonged duration of operation, and use of local anesthesia are the most common contributing factors to wound infection [79]. Treatment is carried out with broad­spectrum antibiotics.
.. Recurrence
Incarcerated inguinal hernias that require emergency repair are more likely to recur. The inguinal region may be anatomically deformed, there may be tissue edema, the sac may be friable or not be completely dissected, the ligature may slide at the neck of the sac, or the sac may not be ligated high enough at the internal ring [9,78]. Due to the potential increased technical difficulties and danger of harm to cord structures in the scarred, previously treated inguinal canal, several authors advise a laparoscopic method for treating recurrent hernias. A laparoscopic technique for recurrence surgery shortens the operating time and has low problems in several minor series [80].
.. Testicular atrophy
Even though testicular vessels are especially susceptible to surgical damage in newborns, very few cases of testicular atrophy after standard hernia repairs have been reported. Fischer et al. [9] reported that testicular atrophy occurs 1% of the time.

Inguinal Hernia in Children: A Literature Review DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.115548
90
According to some research, an irreducible hernia may have obstructed blood flow to the testis, leading to testicular atrophy. Children with undescended testicles or who are less than 2years old have a greater chance of developing testicular atrophy [81].
.. Iatrogenic ascending testis
A rare complication in children is postoperative ascending testis. A study, includ­ing 3776 pediatric inguinal hernia and hydrocele cases, showed an incidence of ascending testis around <1% after an open operation. Therefore, the ascending testis after laparoscopic herniotomy is considered to be less than those statistics after open repair because the laparoscopic approach does not destroy the structure of the ingui­nal canal [82]. Secondary orchidopexy is required to correct this problem [9].
.. Injury to the vas deferens
Vas deferens iatrogenic lesions are severe complications of inguinal canal sur­gery. There are a lot of procedures that involve the vas deferens in pediatric surgical practices. Understanding the consequences of regular inguinal exploration on the inguinal canal’s architecture is crucial. The majority of pediatric operations involve inguinal disease, which necessitates the involuntary manipulation of the vas deferens and other arteries. Sometimes it is impossible to avoid accidentally crushing inguinal contents, and the outcomes are completely unforeseeable. While iatrogenic separa­tion is more dangerous, any disruption to the vas’s continuity might have functional consequences for a long time [83]. The avoidance of iatrogenic damage requires a precise surgical approach that includes early diagnosis and minimum manipulation of the spermatic and vas deferens arteries. Due to the modest exterior and luminal dimensions (1.0mm and 0.19mm.), a repair is technically more difficult if the vas is damaged before mid-puberty. However, current developments in microsurgery still make a repair viable. Microsurgical vasovasostomy is the preferred method of treat­ment for any damage that is discovered after mid-puberty [84].
.. Intestinal injury
The incidence of intestinal infarction is remarkably low with incarcerated hernias. In the report by Rowe and Clatworthy of 351 patients between 1960 and 1965, the incidence of intestinal resection with incarcerated hernias was 1.4%. A review of the hernias series published since 1978 shows no resections in 221 patients with incarcer­ated hernias [9].
.. Loss of abdominal domain
The division of abdominal contents between the hernia and the remaining abdom­inopelvic cavity is sometimes referred to as loss of domain (LOD). Physical problems might develop after hernia repairs if the hernia has a wide lumen of dilation (LOD), meaning that much of the abdominal viscera is outside the abdominal compartment. When intra-abdominal pressure rises, the diaphragm becomes pushed up, which may lead to pneumonia and respiratory failure. The laparotomy incision is more likely to be torn apart by the increased strain caused by rising abdominal pressure; this may lead to wound problems and hernia recurrence. Postoperative recurrence is a major concern; therefore, researchers are trying to identify pre-operative variables that can
