Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5921_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
15.09.2026
Размер:
15 Мб
Скачать
☆
40.
Tisoncik J, Korth M, Simmons C, Farrar J, Martin T, Katze M. Into the eye of the cytokine
storm. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2012;76(1):16–32.
[PubMed][PubMedCentral]
41.
Suntharalingam G, Perry M, Ward S, Brett S, Castello-Cortes A, Brunner M, et al. Cytokine
storm in a phase 1 trial of the anti-CD28 monoclonal antibody TGN1412. N Eng J Med.
2006;355:1018–28.
42.
Pabary R, Singh C, Morales S, Bush A, Alshai K, Bilton D, et al. Antipseudomonal
bacteriophage reduces infective burden and inlammatory response in murine lung.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015;60(2):744–51.
[PubMed]
43.
Dufour N, Delattre R, Chevallereau A, Richard J, Debarbieux L. Phage therapy of
pneumonia is not associated with an overstimulation of the inlammatory response
compared to antibiotic treatment in mice. Antimicrob Agents Chemother.
2019;63(8):e00379-19.
[PubMed][PubMedCentral]
44.
Secor P, Michaels L, Smigiel K, Rohani M, Jennings L, Hisert K, et al. Filamentous
bacteriophage produced by Pseudomonasaeruginosa alters the inlammatory reponse
and promotes noninvasive infection in vivo. Infect Immun. 2017;85:e00648-16.
[PubMed]
45.
Gonzalez-Menendez E, Fernandez L, Gutierrez D, Rodriguez A, Martinez B, Garcia P.
Comparative analysis of different preservation techniques for the storage of
Staphylococcus phages aimed for the industrial development of phage-based
antimicrobial products. PLoS One. 2018;13(10):e0205728.
[PubMed][PubMedCentral]
46.
Duyvejonck H, Merabishvili M, Vaneechoutte M, de Soir S, Wright R, Friman V, et al.
Evaluation of the stability of bacteriophages in different solutions suitable for the
production of magistral preparations in Belgium. Viruses. 2021;13(5):865.
[PubMed][PubMedCentral]
47.
Chang R, Wallin M, Kutter E, Morales S, Britton W, Li J, et al. Storage stability of inhalable
phage powders containing lactose at ambient conditions. Int J Pharm. 2019;560:11–8.
[PubMed]
48.
Jonczyk E, Klak M, Miedzybrodzki R, Gorski A. The inluence of external factors on
bacteriophages – review. Folia Microbiol. 2011;56:191–200.
49.
Chang R, Morales S, Okamoto Y, Chan H. Topical application of bacteriophages for
treatment of wound infections. Transl Res. 2020;220:153–66.
[PubMed]
https://t.me/medicina_free
50.
Golec P, Dabrowski K, Hejnowicz M, Gozdek A, Los J, Wegrzyn G, et al. A reliable method
for storage of tailed phages. J Microbiol Methods. 2011;84(3):486–9.
[PubMed]
51.
Blazanin M, Lam W, Vasen E, Chan B, Turner P. Decay and damage of therapeutic phage
OMKO1 by envrionmental stressors. PLoS One. 2022;17(2):e0263887.
[PubMed][PubMedCentral]
52.
Park H, Kim J, Kim M, Park Y, Ryu S. Development of new strategy combining heat
treatment and phage cocktail for post-contamination prevention. Food Res Int.
2021;145:110415.
[PubMed]
53.
Martin A, Finlay W. Nebulisers for drug delivery to the lungs. Expert Opin Drug Deliv.
2014;12(6):889–900.
[PubMed]
54.
Carrigy N, Chang R, Leung S, Harrison M, Petrova Z, Pope W, et al. Anti-tuberculosis
bacteriophage D29 delivery with a vibrating mesh nebuliser, jet nebuliser, and soft mist
inhaler. Pharm Res. 2017;34(10):2084–96.
[PubMed]
55.
Astudillo A, Leung S, Kutter E, Morales S, Chan H. Nebulisation effects on structural
stability of bacteriophage PEV 44. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2018;125:124–30.
[PubMed]
56.
Leung S, Carrigy N, Vehring R, Finlay W, Morales S, Carter E, et al. Jet nebulisation of
bacteriophages with different tail morphologies – structural effects. Int J Pharm.
2019;554:322–6.
[PubMed]
57.
AstraZeneca. Storage and handling of FLUMIST QUADRIVALENT. 2022 [updated Jan
2023]. Available from: https:// www. lumistquadrival enthcp. com/ storage-handling. html.
58.
Tlaxca J, Ellis S, Remmele R Jr. Live attenuated and inactivated viral vaccine formulation
and nasal delivery: potential and challenges. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2015;93(1):56–78.
[PubMed]
59.
Shetty N, Cipolla D, Park H, Zhou Q. Physical stability of dry powder inhaler
formulations. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2020;17(1):77–96.
[PubMed]
60.
Merabishvili M, Vervaet C, Pirnay J, De Vos D, Verbeken G, Mast J, et al. Stability of
Staphylococcusaureus phage ISP after freeze-drying (lyophilisation). PLoS One.
2013;8(7):e68797.
[PubMed][PubMedCentral]
https://t.me/medicina_free
61.
Chang R, Wong J, Mathai A, Morales S, Kutter E, Britton W, et al. Production of highly
stable spray dried phage formulations for treatment of Pseudomonasaeruginosa lung
infection. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2017;121:1–13.
[PubMed][PubMedCentral]
62.
Leung S, Parumasivam T, Nguyen A, Gengenbach T, Carter E, Carrigy N, et al. Effect of
storage temperature on the stability of spray dried bacteriophage powders. Eur J Pharm
Biopharm. 2018;127:213–22.
[PubMed][PubMedCentral]
63.
Chang R, Wallin M, Lin Y, Leung S, Wang H, Morales S, et al. Phage therapy for respiratory
infections. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2018;133:76–86.
[PubMed][PubMedCentral]
64.
Lin Y, Chang R, Britton W, Morales S, Kutter E, Li J, et al. Storage stability of phage-
ciproloxacin combination powders against Pseudomonasaeruginosa respiratory
infections. Int J Pharm. 2020;591:119952.
[PubMed]
65.
Zillen D, Beugeling M, Hinrichs W, Frijlink H, Grasmeijer F. Natural and bioinspired
excipients for dry powder inhalation formulations. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci.
2021;56:101497.
66.
Vinner G, Rezaie-Yazdi Z, Leppanen M, Stapley A, Leaper M, Malik D. Microencapsulation
of Salmonella-speciic bacteriophage Felix O1 using spray-drying in a pH-responsive
formulation and direct compression tableting of powders into a solid oral dosage form.
Pharmaceuticals. 2019;12:43.
[PubMed][PubMedCentral]
67.
Vandenheuvel D, Meeus J, Lavigne R, Van den Mooter G. Instability of bacteriophages in
spray-dried trehalose powders is caused by crystallisation of the matrix. Int J Pharm.
2014;472(1–2):202–5.
[PubMed]
68.
Chang R, Kwok P, Khanal D, Morales S, Kutter E, Li J, et al. Inhalable bacteriophage
powders: glass transition temperature and bioactivity stabilisation. Bioeng Transl Med.
2020;5(2):e10159.
[PubMed][PubMedCentral]
69.
Bretaudeau L, Tremblais K, Aubrit F, Meichenin M, Arnaud I. Good manufacturing
practice (GMP) compliance for phage therapy medicinal products. Front Microbiol.
2020;11:1161.
[PubMed][PubMedCentral]
70.
Fabijan A, Lin R, Ho J, Maddocks S, Zakour N, Iredell R, et al. Safety of bacteriophage
therapy in severe Staphylococcusaureus infection. Nat Microbiol. 2020;5:465–72.
https://t.me/medicina_free
71.
Chang R, Chow M, Wang Y, Liu C, Hong Q, Morales S, et al. The effects of different doses of
inhaled bacteriophage therapy for Pseudomonasaeruginosa pulmonary infections in
mice. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2022;28(7):983–9.
[PubMed]
72.
Furfaro L, Payne M, Chang B. Bacteriophage therapy: clinical trials and regulatory
hurdles. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2018;8:376.
[PubMed][PubMedCentral]
73.
Uyttebroek S, Chen B, Onsea J, Ruythooren F, Debaveye Y, Devolder D, et al. Safety and
eficacy of phage hterapy in dificult-to-treat infections: a systematic review. Lancet
Infect Dis. 2022;22(8):E208–20.
[PubMed]
https://t.me/medicina_free
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023 J. Lam, P. C. L. Kwok (eds.), RespiratoryDeliveryofBiologics,NucleicAcids,and Vaccines, AAPS Introductions in the Pharmaceutical Sciences 8
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47567-2_9
PharmacokineticsofInhaled Medications–WhatDoWeKnowAbou t BiologicalMacromolecules?
Audrey Huili Lim
1, 2
, Jinxin Zhao
1, 3
, Nusaibah Abdul Rahim
1, 2
,
Jing Zhao4, Haiting Liu4, Xiaoyan Yang4 and Yu-Wei Lin
1, 2, 3
Malaya Translational and Clinical Pharmacometrics Group, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia Infection Program and Department of Microbiology, Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia Department of Neonatology, West China Second University Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People’s Republic of China
Yu-WeiLin Email:yuwei.lin@um.edu.my
Abstract
Over the last decades, biological macromolecules have attracted growing attention and have become an important therapeutic modality. Biological macromolecules are peptide- and protein-based therapeutics with unique pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) properties. Due to its poor bioavailability, biological macromolecules are usually administered via the parenteral route. Pulmonary administration of biological macromolecules is
https://t.me/medicina_free
increasingly employed for treating various diseases, including respiratory viral infections. Due to its complex PK/PD, clinical development of inhaled biological macromolecules remains challenging. In this context, pharmacometrics using quantitative modeling and simulation techniques offer critical insight in understanding the complex PK/PD and providing guidance at various stages throughout the development of inhaled biological macromolecules. This chapter provides an overview of the key pulmonary PK processes and the available modeling and simulation (M&S) tools that can be used to assess and understand PK in the clinical development of inhaled medications, including biological macromolecules.
Keywords Biologics – Mathematical model – Model-informed drug development – Pharmacokinetics – Pharmacometrics
1 Introd uction
Respiratory diseases represent a major global health burden, with approximately 70,000 people living with cystic ibrosis, 250 million with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and 20 million with asthma [1–3]. Furthermore, the annual global death toll from lung cancers and/or pneumonia represents the single largest death, accounting for more than 1.8 million deaths annually [4]. This igure is expected to rise sharply due to the recent outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic. The respiratory drug market is growing at a rate of 4–6% annually; many new therapeutics, including biologics, are currently under development [5].
Biologics refers to a diverse group of large and complex molecules manufactured in, extracted from, or semi-synthesized from biological sources [6]. Generally, biopharmaceuticals range from vaccines and growth factors to enzymes, fusion proteins, hormones, and monoclonal antibodies. Biologics have high commercial potential as they are often associated with high speciicity and high target binding afinity. Nonetheless, biologics are also associated with several limitations, for example, fragility, risk of immune response, high cost, and often require speciic storage conditions to prevent degradation [6–9].
https://t.me/medicina_free
Biological macromolecules including therapeutic peptides, proteins, and antibodies, represent the largest group of biological drugs and are the focus of this chapter.
Successful delivery of biological macromolecules via a non-invasive route remains elusive due to their high polarity and large molecular size [6]. Various non-invasive routes of administration have been investigated for the delivery of biological macromolecules such as oral, nasal, inhalation, and transdermal routes. Pulmonary administration is an attractive route because of the large surface area, extensive vascularization, and high tissue permeability, which enable rapid absorption (depending on the modality) and the potential for rapid onset of activity if the target is local. Moreover, the inhaled route is a comparatively easier form of administration and allows potential self­administration by patients [10]. Pulmonary delivery also offers the advantage of achieving high concentrations in the lungs. To achieve the same drug concentrations in the lungs after systemic drug administration, higher doses would normally be needed compared with inhalation, which would be associated with an increased risk of side effects [11, 12]. As such, aerosolized biological macromolecules are preferable for the treatment of lung diseases such as asthma, lung infection, and COPD [6]. In addition, there is little irst-pass metabolism and proteolytic enzyme activity in the lungs [11, 13].
Clinical pharmacology is the study of the interactions between drugs and the human body and comprises two broad divisions: pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) [14]. PK is deined as the study of the time course of drug absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination (i.e., ADME) while PD is deined as the relationship between drug concentration and the resulting therapeutic effect [15]. Simplistically, PK is the study of what the body does to the drug, whereas PD is the study of what the drug does to the body. Characterization of the relationship between PK and PD is imperative in the discovery and development of new molecules in the pharmaceutical industry. Insights from PK and PD analyses are used by researchers to design better clinical studies, and by clinicians to advise treatment options [16, 17]. The role of mathematical modeling to assess and understand the deposition, PK, and PD of inhaled drugs has gained signiicant interest over the last decade [18].
https://t.me/medicina_free
This chapter provides an overview of the key pulmonary PK processes and the available modeling and simulation (M&S) tools that can be used to assess and understand PK in the clinical development of inhaled medication, including biological macromolecules.
2 KeyDeterminantsofPulmonaryPK
To understand PK following inhalation, a thorough understanding of the key kinetic processes is crucial (Table 1 and Fig. 1). It should be noted that the key factors governing the PK of inhaled biological macromolecules are currently not fully understood. Our current understanding of the PK of inhaled biological molecules is very limited and available literature is mostly based on nonclinical models with very limited clinical utility. This section provides an overview of the key factors impacting pulmonary PK processes based on our understanding of small molecules. It is expected that these factors are also applicable to inhaled biological macromolecules.
Table1 Key determinants that affect pulmonary and systemic PK following inhalation
Kinetic process
Keydeterminants
Pulmonary deposition
Lung morphology, inhalation techniques, formulation, aerosol velocity, geometry, particle size and particle density
Pulmonary dissolution
Physiochemical property of the drug/formulation (e.g., solubility) and the physiology of the lungs
Absorption Bronchial mucus layer, alveolar surfactant, lung epithelium,
lipophilicity, the degree of ionization, molecular weight, drug transporters, areas of the lungs
Distribution Degree of ionization, lipophilicity
Metabolism Expression levels and patterns of the metabolic enzymes, lung
macrophages
Elimination Particle size, solubility, deposition site
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig.1 Schematic representation of the kinetic processes following inhalation. (Adapted from Borghart et al. [18]). Light purple boxes = particle/droplet deposition compartments; light orange boxes = absorption compartments; purple boxes = blood/plasma compartments; purple area = processes associated with pulmonary; blue area = processes associated with the systemic PK
2.1 PulmonaryPhysiology
The lungs are a pair of complex, heterogeneous, pyramid-shaped organs situated in the thoracic cavity (Fig. 2). They are the foundational organs of the respiratory system and consist of two main functional areas: gas exchange parenchyma (e.g., alveolar sacs) and conducting airways (e.g., bronchioles) [19–21].
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig.2 Lung physiology. (Adapted from Williams [22])
Conducting airways bifurcate approximately 17 times, getting smaller with each sequential bifurcation [23–25]. The airways are lined with pseudo-stratiied columnar epithelia, which are mostly composed of basal cells, secretory cells (e.g., goblet and serous cells), and ciliated cells [24, 25]. The walls of conducting airways are too thick for diffusion, and this region does not contain alveoli to facilitate oxygen­carbon dioxide exchange. The main functions of the conducting
https://t.me/medicina_free