Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5625_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
15.09.2026
Размер:
17 Мб
Скачать
☆
References
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
82 Ladenstein, R., Pötschger, U., Valteau-Couanet, D. etal. (2018). Interleukin 2with
anti-GD2 antibody ch14.18/CHO (dinutuximab beta) in patients with high-risk neuroblastoma (HR-NBL1/SIOPEN): a multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial. The Lancet Oncology 19 (12): 1617.
83 Ahmed, M. and Cheung, N.-K.V. (2014). Engineering anti-GD2monoclonal
antibodies for cancer immunotherapy. FEBS Letters 588 (2): 288.
84 Tong, W., Sprules, T., Gehring, K., and Saragovi, H. (2012). Rational design of
peptide ligands against a glycolipid by NMR studies. Methods in Molecular Biology (Clifton, N.J.) (928): 39.
85 Matthay, K.K., George, R.E., and Yu, A.L. (2012). Promising therapeutic targets in
neuroblastoma. Clinical Cancer Research 18 (10): 2740.
86 Perez Horta, Z., Goldberg, J.L., and Sondel, P.M. (2016). Anti-GD2mAbs and
next-generation mAb-based agents for cancer therapy. Immunotherapy 8 (9): 1097.
87 Sait, S. and Modak, S. (2017). Anti-GD2 immunotherapy for neuroblastoma. Expert
Review of Anticancer Therapy 17 (10): 889.
88 Unituxin. In Assessment report, (CHMP), Committee for Medicinal Products for
Human Use, Ed. EMA/CHMP/408316/2015: European Medicines Agency, 2015.
89 Sterner, E., Peach, M.L., Nicklaus, M.C., and Gildersleeve, J.C. (2017). Therapeutic
antibodies to ganglioside GD2 Evolved from highly selective germline antibodies. Cell Reports 20 (7): 1681.
90 Castel, V., Segura, V., and Canete, A. (2010). Treatment of high-risk neuroblastoma
with anti-GD2 antibodies. Clinical & Translational Oncology 12 (12): 788.
91 Markham, A. (2021). Naxitamab: first approval. Drugs 81 (2): 291. 92 DANYELZA®. 4707781, U.S. Food and Drug Administration (2020). 93 Nakamura, K., Tanaka, Y., Shitara, K., and Hanai, N. (2001). Construction of
humanized anti-ganglioside monoclonal antibodies with potent immune effector functions. Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy 50: 275–284.
94 Yang, L., Ma, X., Liu, Y. etal. (2017). Chimeric antigen receptor 4SCAR-GD2-
modified T cells targeting high-risk and recurrent neuroblastoma: a phase II multi-center trial in China. Blood 130: 335.
95 Quintarelli, C., Orlando, D., Boffa, I. etal. (2018). Choice of costimulatory domains
and of cytokines determines CAR T-cell activity in neuroblastoma. Oncoimmunology 7: 3518.
221
8
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
Carbohydrates inTissue Engineering
Laura Russo
1
Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca, Department of Biotechnology and Biosciences, Piazza della Scienza 2,
Milan, 20126, Italy
2
National University of Ireland Galway, CÚRAM SFI Research Centre for Medical Devices, Galway,

1,2
and Francesco Nicotra
1
8.1 Introduction
Carbohydrates cover both the cellular and acellular components of organs and tis­sues. Their role as signaling molecules is well established today[1]. The diversity and dynamism of the sodefined “glycosignature” on cell surfaces and the extracel­lular matrix (ECM) partner proteins are still intriguing and not yet fully understood.
In the fields of tissue engineering and medical devices, carbohydrates play a fun­damental role in both structural and signaling properties. The first applications in fact took advantage of the structural properties of numerous polysaccharides, prone to generate hydrogels[2, 3]. Hyaluronic acid (HA), for example, has been widely employed for regenerative purposes because of its capacity to generate a wide range of hydrogel formulations. Besides this structural role, carbohydrates can be exploited in the development of medical devices for their unique property to participate in recognition events of physiological and pathological relevance. In this context, it is also important to take into account that glycans are differently expressed in humans in various pathophysiological states and across different species[4], with a conse­quent problem in terms of antigenicity when a medical device is made of animal derived materials[5, 6]. Here in this chapter, we will review the glycoengineered solution for both medical devices and tissue engineering applications, taking into consideration not only the advantages but also the dark side that limits their transla­tion in clinics and the challenges for their further development.
223
Carbohydrate-Based Therapeutics, First Edition. Edited by Roberto Adamo and Luigi Lay. © 2024 WILEY-VCH GmbH. Published 2024 by WILEY-VCH GmbH.
 
224
8.2 Biomaterials and Medical Devices: Natural and
Synthetic Strategies
In the last decades, the advancement in medical device and biomaterials research gave rise to different strategies to substitute or replace tissues and organs damaged by pathologies or trauma[7]. Several different biomaterials are available on the mar­ket for this purpose, and great efforts are still in place to overcome the current limi­tations to safely apply them in clinics.
The traditional classification of biomaterials employed as tissue substitutes includes natural polymers, synthetic polymers, hybrid materials, and naturally derived organs and tissues[8–10]. Polysaccharides are relevant components of an ideal biomaterial for their structural properties[11–14]. However, it is important to pay attention to the fact that smaller glycans can act as xenoantigens [15, 16], in particular those exposed in animalderived prosthesis and medical devices. As often in biomedical research, the current design of biocompatible materials replacing tis­sue structure and functions takes inspiration from Nature. Polysaccharides are pre­sent in natural ECMs as glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) and proteoglycans (PGs), whereas N and Oglycosylation cover cell surface and act as a signature to interact with proteinbased components of the ECM [3, 17, 18]. In this large plethora of actors, glycans cover a multitude of roles fundamental to finely regulating tissue morphogenesis and homeostasis. Depending on the features of the organ or tissue that must be repaired or substituted, the origin of the damage (pathological or trau­matic), its morphological features and functionalities, different classes of biomateri­als can be exploited. The current approach to repair tissue damage includes both total substitution[19] or the induction of tissue regenerationexploiting biorespon­sive biomaterials able to stimulate the repair of the damaged tissue[20]. The tradi­tional substitution approach requires the use of permanent prosthesis, whereas in regenerative approaches, biodegradable biomaterials able to induce regeneration invivo or exvivo are used. In the following paragraph, we will overview the role of glycans in both approaches, presenting and discussing the devices already used in clinical applications and the strategies studied for future developments.
8.2.1 Carbohydrates asBuilding Blocks forMedical
Device Formulation
Natural polysaccharides are largely employed in the formulation or coating of medi­cal devices[2]. Those of human origin, even if in principle biocompatible, present significant limitations related to availability and scaleup. Production by recombi­nant methodologies can be a solution, like in the case of HA[21]. A practical alter­native consists of their isolation from vegetal or animal sources in which they are abundant, provided that they are biocompatible and functional. The unique way to obtain employable batches of sulfated polysaccharides, for example, is the extrac­tion of them from animal source[22].
8.2 Biomaterials and Medical Devices: Natural and Synthetic Strategies
Heparan sulfate
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
8.2.1.1 Human Polysaccharides: Glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) and Proteoglycans (PGs)
Polysaccharides like HA, heparan sulfate (HS), heparin, and chondroitin sulfate (CS) (see Figure8.1) are naturally expressed in all human tissues and organs and contribute to the physical properties and physiological function of the tissues of reference[23]. They have been used in the formulation of bioactive medical devices to perform their natural functions (structural and functional), properly affected by functionalization and crosslinking that modulate the bioactivity and degradation rate[24].
Since 1934, HA has been the most employed polysaccharide for the development of medical devices, tissue engineering strategies, and cosmetic formulations[25]. Differentially crosslinked HA has been developed to produce dried matrix or inject­able hydrogels, depending on the final application of interest[25]. The main fields of application of HA include neurosurgery, orthopedy, and woundhealing treat­ment of the skin affected by trauma or pathologies[26]. Several examples of com­mercially available HAbased materials are currently employed in clinical practices. The use of HAbased biomaterials for tissue regeneration takes inspiration from its natural functions; the use in wound healing[4–6], for example, is inspired by the massive presence of HA in the normal epidermis, where it plays a fundamental role in the maintenance of tissue mechanical properties and hydration, as far as in cell migration and proliferation. Remarkably, HAbased materials are also effective in extreme disruptive conditions like chronic damage[27]. The fast invivo degradation of HA is still one of the major limitations for its efficacious application in medical devices, therefore requiring stabilization strategies. To stabilize HA and finely tune the structural properties without affecting the biological properties[28], different
225
O
O
O
O
O
HO
OR
–
R1 = H or SO
3
Chondroitin sulphate
O
HO
OR
O O
R= H or SO
OR
O
3
O
O
HO
–
R1 = Ac or SO
3
1
–
R3 = H or SO
3
O
HO
OH
O
O
O
O
OH
HO
NH
OR
O
2
O
NHR
n
R= H or SO
O
1
n
–
3
OH
O
HO
O
S
O
O
O
R1 = SO
O
OH
Hyaluronic acid
O
–
OOC
O
O
R
2
–
or Ac; R2 = H or SO
3
Heparin
O
O
HO
R1HN
Figure8.1 Examples of polysaccharides expressed in human tissues.
O
NH
OR
O
O
2
O
O
NHR
n
–
3
O
S
O
O
1
n
–
3
 
n
226
Figure8.2 Hyaluronic acid benzyl ester.
degrees of esterification, typically performed with benzyl alcohol, have been experi-
®
mented with. HYAFF
is a registered HA benzyl ester (see Figure8.2), employed in
particular for wound healing[29] and cartilage tissue repair[30].
Cutaneous lesions generated by burns, ulcers, or trauma are usually cured with skin grafts; however, if the covering process cannot be immediately performed, biomaterialbased patches are employed to induce the correct recovery and regen­eration of the damaged area[31]. HYAFFbased medical devices have been success­fully employed for the regeneration of cutaneous lesions, and the different esterification degrees and formulation methodologies allow for modulation of the final shape/geometries of the device[32]. HYAFF has also been employed in chon­drogenic tissue engineering applications for its ability to induce cartilage forma­tion[33]. In vitro studies employing 3D HYAFFbased matrices showed the ability of autologous chondrocytes to restore the physiological signatures of hyaline carti­lage[34], whereas invivo studies demonstrated that seeding with autologous chon­drocytes induces native cartilage tissue formation with optimal integration in the surrounding tissue[33]. Hyalograft C, a medical device based on cartilage autograft obtained from patient chondrocytes cultured on HYAFF, was introduced for surgi­cal arthroscopic techniques in 1999 [35, 36]. In 2013, following an European Medicines Agency (EMA) report on manufacturing practices, Hyalograft C was withdrawn from the European market[37]. Today, methodologies for treatment of cartilage include new approaches in which autologous chondrocytes are delivered into damaged tissues with HA or collagenbased injectable biomaterials[38]. HA is also employed, in different formulations, in ophthalmic viscoelastic devices (OVDs) or dermatological therapies[39]. The first use of untreated HA in ophthalmic sur­gery was reported in cornea transplantation and, today, it is currently employed in ocular surgeries for corneal protection and vitreous replacement [40]. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the first viscosurgical device based on HA in
®
1983, under the trademark Healon
 [41, 42]. Healaflow®, an FDAapproved HA crosslinked with 1,4butanediol diglycidyl ether (BDDE), is employed in vitreoreti­nal surgery[43]. Other ophthalmic applications include the modification of contact lenses with HA solutions. Recently, HA has been exploited to improve contact lens performance or obtain a controlled release of HA in the eye[44, 45]. Other FDA approved products based on crosslinked HA include hydrogels in which the crosslinking is performed with divinyl sulphone (DVS), such as commercial dermal
8.2 Biomaterials and Medical Devices: Natural and Synthetic Strategies
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
defect fillers (Hylaform®, CaptiqueTM, Prevelle®, Lift®, and Varioderm®). In the cosmetic field, the most employed HAcrosslinked hydrogels are based on the men-
®
tioned HADVS and HABDDE (Restylane
, Juvéderm®, Teosyal®, and Hyabell®) as
injectable materials[39, 46–48].
Sulfated polysaccharides, normally linked to proteins as PGs, have impressive bio­chemical and structural roles in the regulation of tissue morphology and cell devel­opment and have consequently been extensively employed in medical devices and studied for clinical translation. Among them, CS, a sulfated linear polysaccharide based on repeating units of glucuronic acid (GlcA) and Nacetylgalactosamine (GalNAc) (Figure 8.1), has been largely employed in the biomaterials field [2, 49–51]. The sulfation pattern of CS, usually at the positions4 and 6, affects the physiological role. CS is found in many tissues and organs of the human body, from central nervous system (CNS) to cartilage, skin, bones, and blood vessels. In particu­lar, the major efforts in the development of CSbased medical devices are focused on the replacement or treatment of cartilage defects and the regeneration of CNS func­tions. CS is often employed in combination with other natural polymers to generate
®
hybrid medical devices. Esoxx
is a hybrid medical device employed as mucosal bar-
rier for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux symptoms based on HA and CS
®
embedded in Lutrol
F 127, a poloxamer with bioadhesive properties [52]. HA/
CSbased medical devices are also employed as injectable hydrogel to treat osteoar-
®
thritic (OA) knee, as reported for Structovial CS
[53]. In this formulation, CS has a double role: optimizing the HA rheological properties and regulating the cartilage metabolism and remodeling[53]. CS is also extensively employed in formulations with glucosamine for oral administration as Symptomatic Slow Acting Drugs for Osteoarthritis (SYSADOA), even if this use is still debated and several clinical stud­ies are ongoing[54]. Other sulfated polysaccharides exploited in clinical translation are HS and heparin (Figure8.1). HS is heavily expressed in the ECM and on the cell surface as HSPGs . The structure and length of the polysaccharide chains are highly variable due to the different sulfation degrees, the different combinations of disac­charide components, and, like for other ECM polysaccharides, the variable molecu­lar weight [55]. The typical disaccharide components consist of 40–60% of βglucuronic acid (GlcA) or αiduronic acid (IdoA) linked by (1
→ 4) glycosidic bonds to glucosamine, which can be Nacetylated or Nsulfated[56, 57]. Mimetics of HS have been developed by derivatizing dextran with carboxymethyl, carboxym­ethyl benzylamide, and carboxymethyl benzylamide sulfonate groups[58, 59]. An
®
example is a commercially available product named RGTA the treatment of chronic skin damages (CACIPLIQ20
®
(Cacicol20
). Other applications of RGTA are under study and include osteochon-
, currently employed for
®
) and for corneal regeneration
dral, gastroenterological, cardiac, and nervous system applications[60]. Heparin contains the same monosaccharides of HS, which can also be, in this case, sulfated as Ido(2S) and GlcA(2S), and the GlcN unit can be Nsulfated (GlcNS) or N acetylated (GlcNAc) with differential patterns and degrees[61]. The substitution patterns with Osulfate and Nacetyl groups result in a wide range of complex structures. Also, heparin has been largely investigated and employed in the pharmaceutical and
227
 
228
material device fields for different applications, even if, considering its main role as an anticoagulant, the use of heparinbased medical devices is mainly focused on bloodcontacting materials[61, 62]. Temporary or permanent devices like hemodi­alysis catheters, coronary or vascular stents and grafts, bypass devices, and extracor­poreal circulation devices exploit heparincoated materials[57, 62–64]. The two general methods employed for the development of heparincoated devices are based on eluting technologies and noneluting technologies. Eluting technologies include all the approaches in which heparin is released in a controlled way, taking advan­tage of noncovalent coatings based on physical or ionic interactions [62, 65, 66]. These methods are employed when heparin delivery is needed to prevent acute and local devicerelated blood clots. The other approach is based on the covalent func­tionalization of the medical device surface with heparin[67, 68]. This approach is desirable when longterm thromboresistance is needed at the material surface. Different conjugation methodologies exploit the direct coupling of complementary functional groups already present in heparin and the material surface counterpart, or alternatively introduce new chemoselective orthogonal functional groups and properly tailored linkers to better control heparin exposition and consequently the antithrombotic activity. The chemical nature of the medical device will influence the choice in light of the functional groups eventually present at the surface or, alternatively, introducible upon proper treatment. The most employed conjugation methodologies are based on carbodiimide chemistry, exploiting the carboxyl group of heparin, or oxidation mediated by periodate, for controlled oxidative degradation to generate some aldehydes[69]. A coating material based on heparin, polyethylene oxide, and sulphonate groups covalently conjugated to hydrophilic modified poly-
TM
ethyleneimine (ASTUTE and licensed to Medtronic as Trillium dialysis catheters[62, 64]. Another example is Bioline
technology) has been developed by BioInteractions Ltd
®
to cover cardiopulmonary bypass and hemo-
®
, developed by Jostra AG and now a property of Maquet Medical, a material obtained with heparin linked to human albumin employed for coating vascular grafts and cardiopulmonary bypass[63, 70]. The conjugation of heparin to polyamine carriers, performed by introducing etherofunctional crosslinkers, is currently employed as Corline Heparine Surface Technology, developed by Corline System AB. Many other coating methodologies employed for the modification of medical device surfaces to control the interface between blood components and material surface, and to minimize blood clot formation and thrombolytic events are reported with other commercial examples in Table8.1.
®
8.2.1.2 Polysaccharides fromPlants, Algae, Animal, and
Microbial Fermentation
The large availability of polysaccharides derived from plants, algae, and animals and the possibility to produce them by microbial fermentation make them very attractive and cheaper starting materials[13]. Several studies are focused on the biocompatibility of such polysaccharides, and many of them are already in clinical applications. These polysaccharides present an interesting variety of biochemical and physical properties that can eventually be advantageously exploited in
8.2 Biomaterials and Medical Devices: Natural and Synthetic Strategies
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
Table8.1 Examples of commercial heparin-coating technologies.
Polymer Commercial names Application References
229
HA benzyl ester
Sodium hyaluronate
HA–BDDE
HA–DVS and HA–BDDE
HA–CS embedded in
®
Lutrol
HA–CS
Mimetics of HS–derivatized dextran with sulfonate groups
Heparin, polyethylene oxide, and sulfonate groups covalently conjugated to polyethyleneimine
Heparin linked to human albumin
Heparin linked by reductive amination to matrices bearing amino groups
Heparin UV photocrosslinked
Layer by layer coatings. The last layer (4) is coated with polyethyleneimine linked to Heparin by reductive amination
Heparin and benzalkonium chloride blended
HYAFF
®
Osteochondral regeneration, wound
[29, 30, 32–34]
healing
®
Healon
Healaflow
®
HADVS (Hylaform
TM
Captique Varioderm (Restylane Teosyal
Esoxx
, Prevelle®, Lift®,
®
) HABDDE
®
, Juvéderm®,
®
, Hyabell®)
®
®
,
Viscosurgical devices [41, 42]
Vitreoretinal
[43]
surgery[43] Dermal defect fillers [39, 46–48]
Treatment of gastro
[52] esophageal reflux symptoms
Structovial CS
®
Treatment of osteoarthritic (OA)
[53]
knee
®
RGTA
(CACIPLIQ20® and
®
Cacicol20
)
ASTUTE™/TRILLIUM coating
BIOLINE
®
Coating
Chronic skin damages and corneal regeneration
Hemodialysis
®
catheters, bypass devices
Vascular grafts, extracorporeal
[58–60]
[62, 64]
[63, 70]
circulation devices
CARMEDA
®
Surface (CBAS Surface)
BioActive
®
Heparin
Extracorporeal circulation devices, stentgrafts, vascular grafts, ventricular
[62, 71]
assist devices
PHOTOLINK
®
Various medical devices
[62]
Hepamed™ Coronary stents [62, 72]
DURAFLO II
®
Extracorporeal circulation devices
[62]
 
230
biomedical applications. Furthermore, they can be properly modified to control the properties and final morphologies of a large plethora of formulations. The main nonhuman polysaccharides exploited for biomedical devices are alginates, carra­geenan, and fucoidan (derived from algae), dextran, pullulan, and gellan (derived from microbes), and chitosan (derived from animals) (see Figure8.3).
–
+
Na
O
HO
Na+ –OCC
O
HO
R
O
OH
HO
HO
OH
1
O
G
O
OH
Alginate
OH
O
NH
2
Chitosan
OH
2
O
R
1
Carrageenan
R= –OH, OSO
O
OH
O
O
OH
O
HO
Pullulan
O
HO
HO
O
COO
OH
O
M
NH
HO
O
2
O
O
n
OH
R
5
R
3
O
O
R
4
n
–
3
OH
O
OH
OH
O HO
HO
HO
HO
O
O
O
OH
O
n
OH
HOOC
OH
O
O
HO
OH
O
O
HO
Gellan gum
HO
HO
OH
HO
HO
OH
O
HO
OH
O
O
OH
O
O
O
OH
HO
Dextran
OH
Fucoidan
O
OH
OH
O
OH
O
O
HO
OH
O
HO
OSO
OH
OH
O
OH
O
HO
O
O
OSO
O
O
–
OSO
3
– 3
HO
O
O
O
O
O
n
n
O
O
–
OSO
3
–
3
Figure8.3 Examples of nonhuman polysaccharides employed for biomedical device formulations.