Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5382_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
15.09.2026
Размер:
17 Мб
Скачать
☆
target tissues due to the action of eux transporters such as p-glycoprotein (PGP) and breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP). If the data is available, selection of compounds with more rapid in vivo pharmacokinetics may be favored: when using short-lived radio­nuclides, prolonged tissue retention is not useful; and for many applications of in vivo imaging, the ability to determine both the uptake and washout of a radiotracer in a dynamic fashion provides information useful for pharmacokinetic modeling. Finally, the development of radiotracers for imaging in the central nervous system (CNS) faces the additional requirement of passing the blood-brain barrier (BBB), a membrane system that eciently excludes many compounds: CNS entry can be achieved using an active transport process or through passive diusion, with the latter requiring consideration of the molecular size and lipophilicity.
In the following chapters of this Handbook of Radiopharmaceuticals, methods for pro­ducing radionuclides and radiopharmaceuticals, methods for evaluating new candidate radiotracers, and the many exciting applications of radiolabeled compounds for in vivo nuclear medicine imaging are discussed in detail. If radiopharmaceuticals are indeed the “future of nuclear medicine,” where do the ideas for new radiotracer structures come from? Although often the origins of a radiotracer are not clear, there are nevertheless a variety of sources of chemical structures that can be identied as useful for targeted radiotracer design (Table1.1), and this chapter will focus on the early step of identifying appropriate chemical structures suitable for development into small-molecule radio­tracers (for discussion purposes, small molecules are considered to have MW <600). Many of the examples arise from the eld of positron emission tomography (PET) radio­pharmaceutical chemistry, simply because it has often proven easier to radiolabel small molecules with carbon-11 or uorine-18. There are, however, important examples of radioiodinated single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) agents–e.g.
123
[
I]Ioupane (DaTscan®), [ iodobenzamide ([
123
99m into relatively small molecules with some success ([
123I/131
I]meta-iodobenzylguanidine ([
123I/131
I]MIBG), and [
123
I]IBZM)–and eorts have been made to incorporate technetium-
99m
Tc]TRODAT-1). Although
I]
the sources for radiotracer development listed in Table1.1 are discussed separately, it should be understood that combinations of the methods are often used to arrive at a molecule that can be successfully employed for in vivo imaging of biochemistry in living human subjects.
Endogenous compounds Established therapeutic drugs Pharmaceutical industry In vitro assay reagents High-throughput screening Natural products (plant derived)
Table 1.1
So
urces
ofleads for
chemical matter
fordesign anddevelopment ofnew invivo
imaging radiophar­maceuticals.
Chapter 1: Targeted Diagnostic Radiopharmaceuticals 5
1.2   LABEL ANENDOGENOUS COMPOUND  ORDERIVATIVE
The radiolabeling of an endogenous chemical species is perhaps the simplest and oldest concept in radiotracer design: one of the earliest syntheses with carbon-11 was that of
11
[
C]acetic acid[6]. If the radiolabeling is done at a suciently high specic activity, then there should be no concerns regarding pharmacological eects or toxicology, as the mass of compound injected is likely far below normal physiological concentrations. It is also likely that the metabolism of an endogenous compound is very well known. A large number of endogenous compounds and derivatives have been radiolabeled and used for imaging studies: an incomplete listing of such radiopharmaceuticals is given in Table1.2. The labeling of endogenous compounds has been primarily done using PET radionuclides
11
(
C, 13N, 18F), simply because of the simplicity in isotopic substitutions (e.g. 11C for 12C) or the observation that incorporation of the small uorine atom is often well tolerated[7]. For example, many natural and non-natural amino acids have been synthesized with
13
N, or 18F radiolabels, using a variety of approaches to prepare radiotracers in a regiospe­cic or stereospecic fashion. Incorporating SPECT radionuclides into endogenous com­pounds is more challenging but has in some cases been successful with radioiodinated aromatic or non-natural amino acids[8].
Radiolabeled endogenous compounds may not seem to t the simple concept of tar­geted radiotracers, as the biochemical processes they address are often ubiquitous, but they have proven useful when the target is enhanced or reduced in a pathophysiological condition. The best-known and most-used radiopharmaceutical based on an endogenous compound is 2-deoxy-2-[ tical used daily in clinical medicine, [
18
F]uoro-d-glucose ([18F]FDG). As the PET radiopharmaceu-
18
F]FDG can be considered to target a specic biochemical process: the metabolism of glucose. The localization of radioactivity is, how­ever, dependent on the action of one of the family of glucose transporters followed by enzyme-mediated phosphorylation to form 2-deoxy-2-[ That metabolite is eectively retained in cells, and [ metabolic trapping radiotracer. The powerful applications of [
18
F]uoro-d-glucose-6-phosphate.
18
F]FDG is a classic example of a
18
F]FDG are the result of
11
C,
Table 1.2
Exa
mples
Type of molecule Radiotracer example
ofendogenous mol­ecules andderiva­tives used asinvivo
imaging radiophar­maceuticals.
Amino acids [11C]methionine Fatty acids [ Sugars [ Nucleosides [ Carboxylic acids [ Choline [ Steroids [ Biogenic amines [ Arachidonic acid [
6 Handbook of Radiopharmaceuticals
11
C]palmitate
11
C]glucose, 2-[18F]uoro-2-deoxyglucose (FDG)
11
C]thymidine, [18F]uorothymidine
11
C]pyruvic acid, [11C]ascorbic acid
11
C]choline, [18F]uorocholine
18
F]uoroestradiol
11
C]epinephrine, [18F]uorodopamine
11
C]arachidonic acid
the localized changes in glucose metabolism, with both increases (in tumors) or decreases (in the brain in degenerative diseases) providing valuable information about physiology.
The tissue localization of radioactivity from [
18
F]FDG represents the action of a trans­porter and an enzyme, in that order. For endogenous compounds, the involvement of multiple biochemical steps in radiotracer uptake and localization is very common[9].
18
[
F]Fluorothymidine ([18F]FLT) has been successfully used for tumor imaging, with the mechanism of tumor retention proposed as trapping following phosphorylation by thy­midine kinase, but the uptake of the radiotracer is also dependent on the equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1 (ENT1, SLC29A1 ). The successful accumulation and imaging of a radiotracer can also represent the actions of two transporters: for retention of the SPECT radiotracer [
11
tracer [
C]hydroxyephedrine ([11C]HED) into presynaptic adrenergic neurons of the heart,
123
I]MIBG into neuroendocrine tumors or the uptake of the PET radio-
it is a combination of transport by the neuronal membrane norepinephrine transporter (NET, SLC6A2 ) and the vesicular monoamine transporter type 2 (V MAT 2 , SLC18A2 ). The use of either radiotracer in the heart provides a measure of the integrity of the adren­ergic innervation[10]. The brain radiotracers [
18
and 6-[
F]uorodihydroxyphenylalanine ([18F]FDOPA) are examples where the specic
11
C]dihydroxyphenylalanine ([11C]DOPA)
localization of radioactivity in the synaptic vesicles of presynaptic dopaminergic neurons results from a combination of actions by, in order, the large amino acid transporter 1 (LAT1, SLC7A5 ) in the BBB, an intra-neuronal enzyme (dihydroxyphenylalanine [DOPA] decarboxylase) that converts the radiotracers to radiolabeled neurotransmitters ([ dopamine and 6-[ VMAT2) that moves those species inside neuronal storage vesicles. Thus, [
18
and [
F]FDOPA target dopamine biosynthesis but represent a combination of three
18
F]uorodopamine), and a second intra-neuronal transporter (the
11
C]DOPA
11
C]
biochemical processes. Furthermore, the radioactivity distribution and retention from
11
[
C]DOPA and [18F]FDOPA are also dependent on the actions of two metabolic enzymes,
COMT (catecholamine O-methyl transferase) and MAO (monoamine oxidase). Despite
this complexity, [
18
F]FDOPA remains a useful radiotracer for human PET studies.
Many of the endogenous amino acids have been isotopically radiolabeled with nitrogen-13 or carbon-11, and numerous amino acid derivatives have been radiola­beled using uorine-18 (incorporation of a single uorine atom or a small uorinated substituent) or radioisotopes of iodine[11–14]. The complex biochemical fates of the amino acids nicely demonstrate the potential–and diculties–in the design and use of endogenous molecules as imaging agents. The movement of radiolabeled amino acids into and within cells is accomplished by no less than 51 transporters[15], and amino acids are involved in protein synthesis, neurotransmitter synthesis, redox balance (formation of glutathione and NADH/NADP+ coupling)[16], and energy-producing metabolism[17]. For the purposes of in vivo imaging, the natural amino acids may be not optimal, as their tissue localization reects their multiple metabolic pathways; but that has not pre­vented their use in human studies, as exemplied by tumor imaging with [
11
C]methionine (Figure1.2) as a purported marker of protein synthesis. The design of a derivative of a natural amino acid such as (2-[ amino acids such as [
11
C]ACHC (aminocyclohexanecarboxylic acid)[19] or [18F]FACBC
18
F]uoroethyl)-l-tyrosine ([18F]FET)[18] or non-natural
Chapter 1: Targeted Diagnostic Radiopharmaceuticals 7
11
O
OO
F
F]FACBC
Figure 1.2 Targeted
radiopharma­ceuticals based on structures of amino acids.
S
CH
3
A: [11C]methionine
HO
18
C:[
NH
18
F]FSPG
OH
OO
2
B: (2S,4R)4-[
OH
H2N
18
F
18
F]Fluoroglutamine
O
H2N
18
F
D: [
NH
OH
OH
2
18
(1-amino-3-[18F]uorocyclobutanecarboxylic acid: Fluciclovine, Axumin®, Figure1.2)[20] provides radiotracers that cannot be incorporated into proteins and are resistant to metabolism: such radiotracers target only the transporters primarily involved in their movement into tissues or tumors. The application of radiolabeled amino acids to probe tumor metabolism is exemplied by the synthesis of 4-[ which is transported via the cysteine/glutamate antiporter (X
18
F]uoroglutamine (Figure1.2),
−
, SLC 7A11 ) into tumor
C
cells where it is can be subject to further metabolism or incorporation into macromol­ecules[21]. Finally, the potential use of an amino acid derivative to study cellular redox status is suggested for the radiotracer [
18
F]FSPG (S-4-(3-[18F]uoropropyl)-l-glutamic acid,
Figure1.2)[22].
Most of the radiopharmaceutical examples in Table1.2 are radiolabeled substrates for enzymes or transporters but are not radioligands that image specic binding to receptors. Why? The endogenous ligands for receptors usually have binding anities too low for imaging specic binding in vivo: as an example, the anity of dopamine for dopa­mine receptors is micromolar and does not match the <10 nM binding anities of suc­cessful in vivo dopamine D2/D3 receptor imaging agents. One exception to this general limitation of receptor binding agents is the radiopharmaceutical [
18
F]uoroestradiol ([18F] FES). In vivo studies with radiolabeled estradiol started as early as 1967, with attempts to construct compartmental models for the specic binding of tritiated estradiol following intravenous administration and ex vivo tissue distribution studies[23]. The potential use of radiolabeled estrogens for breast cancer imaging stimulated years of eort to radiolabel estradiol, both with SPECT isotopes (16α-[
123
I]iodoestradiol[24] and 16α-[77Br] iodoestradiol[25]) and subsequently with uorine-18 for PET imaging. Those eorts culminated in 16-α-[ receptor (reported K
18
F]uoroestradiol as a high-anity radioligand for the estrogen
as low as 0.13 nM in cell studies[26]) that has subsequently been
i
used by numerous institutions to image and characterize the receptor status of primary breast tumors[27]. The story of estrogen receptor imaging does not, however, end with
18
[
F]FES. The recent identication of two types of estrogen receptors (ER-α and ER-β) may prompt research into radiotracers that show subtype specicity: whether these will be estradiol derivatives, derived from therapeutic agents, or newly designed xenobiotics cannot be predicted. Estradiol can be considered an endogenous compound that was
8 Handbook of Radiopharmaceuticals
slightly modied to become an in vivo imaging agent targeting a specic receptor, but it could just as well have been used as an example of a clinically used drug successfully con­verted into an in vivo imaging agent, as discussed in the next section.
1.3  LABEL APHARMACEUTICAL OR DERIVATIVE
The radiolabeling of a candidate drug molecule with a long-lived radionuclide (3H or
14
C) to evaluate its disposition and metabolism has long been part of pharmaceutical development programs. The in vivo distribution of such new molecules can also be directly studied using isotopic substitutions with PET isotopes (e.g. In recent years, many of the large pharmaceutical companies have added capabilities for radiochemical syntheses with PET or SPECT radioisotopes, allowing them to develop radiotracers useful as in vivo biomarkers for preclinical evaluation of new drug candi­dates. Those eorts have yielded a number of radiotracers with impact on their drug development programs and led some investigators to form generalized concepts for successful biomarker development[28, 29]. The decades of eort by medicinal chem­ists in the pharmaceutical industry have resulted in the syntheses of many thousands of compounds, of which only a very small fraction have been eventually developed into marketable drugs. Whereas such libraries of compounds are used by in-house radiotracer development programs at pharmaceutical companies, they often remain inaccessible to academic researchers interested in radiopharmaceutical development: increased access to such chemical matter would be highly desired but will require more extensive industry-academia collaborations[30]. A number of clinically used drug molecules or compounds reported by pharmaceutical companies have, however, been the basis for suc­cessful radiopharmaceutical development in several dierent fashions, as exemplied in Figure1.3 and discussed in this chapter.
In a few cases, it has been possible to radiolabel a therapeutic drug molecule using isotopic substitutions with carbon-11 or uorine-18 (a large proportion of drugs have uorine substituents[31]). Examples of drugs directly converted to in vivo imaging agents include [ benzodiazepine binding site), [ antagonist), [
11
[
C]l-DOPA (levodopa, a dopamine precursor), [11C]erlotinib (Tarceva®: epidermal
growth factor receptor [EGFR] inhibitor), [
11
[
C]verapamil (Verelan®: calcium channel blocker). The monoamine oxidase inhibitor
deprenyl (Selegiline
11
C or 18F]umazenil (Romazicon®: antagonist of the GABAA receptor-
11
C]methylphenidate (Ritalin®: dopamine transporter [DAT]
18
F]altanserin (5HT2A receptor antagonist), [11C]elacridar (PGP inhibitor),
11
C]metomidate (Hypnodil®: hypnotic), and
®
) was rst radiolabeled by isotopic substitution with carbon-11 and then underwent a second isotopic substitution with deuterium to improve human brain imaging pharmacokinetics[32]. Radiotracers based on drugs that have been discontinued from therapeutic human use, such as [ which are only used as veterinary drugs, such as [
11
C]rolipram (phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor), or
11
C]carfentanil (Wildnil®: opiate agonist
used as an animal tranquilizer), have also found applications in human studies.
In other cases, the molecular structure of a clinical drug molecule needed to be
slightly modied to accommodate the radionuclide, to improve pharmacokinetics or
11
C for 12C, 18F for 19F).
Chapter 1: Targeted Diagnostic Radiopharmaceuticals 9
N
O
N
Cl
(B)
(C)
(D)
Figure 1.3 Tar-
geted radio­pharmaceuticals based on struc­tures of known therapeutic drugs.
(A)
N
N
F
O
O
N
CH
3
Isotopic substitution
N
18
F
O
O
O
N
11
CH
3
Flumazenil
COOH
N
N
O
Candesartan
HO
H
N
N
N
Minor
N
change
COOH
N
H
N
N
N
N
O
11
CH
3
HO
Major
N
N
OCH
3
change
N
N
Misonidazole
NO
2
NO
2
FMISO
18
F
OCH
IBZM
N
3
H
O
N
HO
H
O
N
N
123
I
Choose
H2NO2S
OCH
Sulpiride
3
analog
O11CH
N
3
H
O
N
Raclopride
Cl
metabolism or to simplify its radiochemical synthesis. To design a radiotracer for SPECT imaging in epilepsy, the uorine in umazenil was replaced with radioiodine, yielding the compound [
123
I]iomazenil. The heart drugs candesartan (Cilexetil®) and losartan (Cozaar®)
are angiotensin II receptor antagonists where small changes in structure (substitution
10 Handbook of Radiopharmaceuticals
of methyl groups for ethyl or propyl substituents) were necessary to accommodate easy radiochemical labeling with [
11
C]methyl iodide; but the slight molecular modication (e.g. ethyl to methyl group) did not result in signicant loss of in vitro anities, and the resul­tant molecules proved useful as in vivo radioligands for cardiac imaging[33]. As discussed earlier, 16-α-[
18
F]uoroestradiol is a simple uorinated derivative of the clinical drug
estradiol.
A larger, more signicant change in molecular structure might be needed, however, as exemplied for the hypoxic radiosensitizer misonidazole: to provide for incorporation of the radionuclide, the methoxy group of misonidazole was replaced by a uorine atom in the synthesis of [
18
F]FMISO (uoromisonidazole) that is widely used in PET imaging[2]. Even more fortuitous was the discovery of a substituted diphenylsulde (403U76) as an inhibitor of neuronal serotonin reuptake; that molecular structure provided the lead to a large number of carbon-11, uorine-18, and radioiodine labeled diphenylsul­des that have been developed for in vivo imaging of the serotonin transporter (SERT, SLC6A4)[34].
Sometimes an analog of the clinical drug is chosen for radiolabeling and evaluation as an in vivo imaging agent: this may be due to the dierent pharmacokinetics required for an in vivo imaging agent intended for intravenous injection as compared to a chronic orally administered drug. Examples are the numerous substituted benzamides that were synthesized by medicinal chemists in the pharmaceutical industry[35]. These were investigated as potential antipsychotics based on pharmacological activity as dopamine receptor antagonists, and sulpiride (Dogmatil
®
) was developed into the clinical drug. It was, however, not chosen for development as a radioligand for in vivo brain imaging studies of dopamine receptors. Instead, an iodobenzamide ([
123
I]IBZM) and [11C]raclopride were synthesized as analogs of sulpiride, and both have been used for more than 30 years for SPECT and PET imaging of the D2/D3 receptor in the human brain[36, 37]. Numerous other benzamides have subsequently been radiolabeled, but only recently has sulpiride been carbon-11 labeled[38]: not as a dopaminergic radioligand, but rather as a substrate for organic cation transporters OCT1 (S LC22 A1 ) and OCT2 (SLC22A2), and multidrug and toxin extrusion-type transporters MATE1 (SLC47A1 ) and MATE2 (SLC47A 2 ).
There is also the possibility of “rening” an old drug into a new, useful in vivo radio-
pharmaceutical. The benzoisoquinoline tetrabenazine (Xenazine
®
) was invented in the late 1950s as an atypical antipsychotic, and in recent years it has been used in clinical care for treating selected movement disorders. In 1990, isotopic substitution was used to synthesize [
11
C]TBZ; and in vivo PET imaging of its intended target, the VMAT2 in the brain, was successfully achieved in humans[39]. Signicant improvements in the imaging of the VMAT2 were achieved when it was recognized that the brain pharmacokinetics actually represented a mixture of four stereoisomeric metabolites: application of modern methods for chiral chromatographic resolution allowed for the isolation, identication (absolute conguration), and carbon-11 labeling of a single high-anity stereoisomer
11
(+)- α-[
C]dihydrotetrabenazine ((+)-α-[11C]DTBZ)[40]. This radiotracer optimization illus­trates two useful concepts: understanding the metabolism of a drug (the metabolites may actually be higher anity for the target site!) and using only single diastereomers of
Chapter 1: Targeted Diagnostic Radiopharmaceuticals 11
drugs with multiple chiral centers. Furthermore, the eorts in radiotracer development may have impacted the design of a new VMAT2 inhibitor (valbenazine, Ingrezza), a pro­drug form of the single isomer (+)-α-DTBZ, which has been recently introduced into clinical use.
The radiolabeling of a class of clinical drugs does not always work, however. The selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) such as uoxetine (Prozac), citalopram (Celexa), and related compounds constitute an important and highly successful group of clinical drugs in psychiatry. The radiolabeling of such drugs with carbon-11 or uorine-18 failed to produce useful in vivo imaging agents for human PET studies of the SERT largely due to the high non-specic binding of those lipophilic drugs[41, 42].
Established clinical drugs and the pharmaceutical industry are thus a rich source of chemical matter for potential development into an in vivo imaging agent. One advantage of a clinical drug is that the pharmacology, toxicology, and metabolism are already established in humans, and the doses in clinical use are likely orders of magnitude higher than the trace mass doses present in radiopharmaceuticals: this makes obtaining regulatory approvals much simpler. However, in many cases, a clinically used therapeutic drug does not work as a radiotracer, as the desired pharmacokinetics in blood and target tissues from an oral drug dose[43] usually do not match the relatively rapid pharmacoki­netics desired for an in vivo imaging radiotracer labeled with short-lived radionuclides.
1.4   FROM INVITRO REAGENTS 
TOINVIVO IMAGING
The compounds synthesized as part of drug development represent only a portion of the vast numbers of chemical structures that have been synthesized. There are examples of the development of in vivo imaging radiotracers based on chemicals that were useful for in vitro purposes but were never developed as drugs (Figure1.4).
Two examples of radiotracers used for in vivo brain β-amyloid imaging have origins in the chemical compounds used for in vitro tissue staining. The neutral uorescent probe
DDNP (1,1-dicyano-2-[6-(dimethylamino)napthalen-2-yl]propene) was developed by
Jacobsen etal.[44] as a reagent for microscopy studies but was then later radiolabeled with uorine-18: the resultant radioligand [ amyloid and tau in human brains[45]. Thioavin-T, a dye used in histochemistry to selec­tively stain amyloid in post-mortem brain tissues, was selected by Mathis and Klunk as the starting point for the design of a brain-penetrant amyloid imaging agent[46]. The struc­ture of thioavin-T includes a positively charged quaternary heterocyclic nitrogen, which prevented its use directly as a brain imaging agent (it would not penetrate the BBB). The syntheses of a series of derivatives was thus undertaken, with the most important step being the removal of the methyl group on the quaternary nitrogen, eventually yield­ing several candidate compounds for radiolabeling; the best compound then chosen for labeling with carbon-11 was designated 6-Me-BTA-1, or more commonly known as PIB (Pittsburgh compound B) (Figure1.3). [ used for many thousands of human PET studies.
18
F]FDDNP was used for in vivo PET imaging of
11
C]PIB ([N-methyl-11C]6-Me-BTA-1) has now been
12 Handbook of Radiopharmaceuticals
H3C
HO
[11C]PIB [18F]FEOBV
S
+
N
CH
3
Thioflavin-T
Figure 1.4 Tar-
CH
3
N
CH
3
N
geted radio­pharmaceuticals based on struc­tures of in vitro chemical probes.
OH
Vesamicol
11
CH
NH
3
O
S
N
18
F
N
OH
Two further examples of compounds that became radiotracers but not drugs come from studies of the cholinergic system in the brain. Quiniclidinyl benzilate (QNB) was synthesized by chemists at Homan-La Roche in the 1950s and is useful as an in vitro tri­tiated radioligand for studies of the muscarinic cholinergic receptor, but QNB only drew human use interest as, unfortunately, a possible chemical war agent. However, when labeled with radioiodine, QNB was converted to radiotracers ([
123
I]QNB) successfully used for in vivo imaging, including one of the earliest examples of receptor-targeted human SPECT imaging[47]. Another example is vesamicol, a potent neuromuscular blocking agent[48] subsequently identied as a high-anity inhibitor of the vesicular transporter for acetylcholine (VAChT, SLC18A3 ). Multiple research groups pursued the radiolabeling of vesamicol and derivatives with radioiodine, carbon-11, and uorine-18 with the goal of identifying in vivo imaging biomarkers for presynaptic cholinergic neurons[49], and the radiotracer [
18
F]FEOBV (Figure1.3) is in current use in human PET
studies[50, 51].
Finally, there are the recently reported radiolabeled substrates for MAOs that function as in vivo metabolic trapping agents[52]. These radiotracers can be considered as derived from the neurotoxin MPTP (1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine), but with a structural modication (insertion of an ether oxygen between the phenyl and tetrahydropyridine rings) that retains the reactivity with MAO but removes the neurotoxicity concerns. The radiotracers derived from QNB, vesamicol, and MPTP are examples of successful use of highly toxic chemicals as starting materials for radiotracer development, which is only possible because the structural modications or high specic activities of the radiopharmaceuticals allow their administration at very low and safe mass doses.
Chapter 1: Targeted Diagnostic Radiopharmaceuticals 13
1.5   DO HIGH-THROUGHPUT SCREENING 
O11CH
(B)
OFACHEMICAL LIBRARY
High-throughput screening (HTS) is a technique that screens a chemical library (often many thousands of compounds) against an in vitro assay in the search for “hits”: that is, chemical structures that appear to interact with the target. In the pharmaceutical industry, the structures identied as hits provide leads for the development of new chemical matter, where structural renements are then made to obtain optimal candi­date drug molecules. HTS has been used by PET research groups in both industry and aca­demia to identify scaolds for successful in vivo imaging agent development.
The phosphodiesterase 10A (PFD10A) enzyme was discovered in 1999 and has become of signicant interest for the development of drugs useful in a variety of psychiatric dis­eases. The research group at Merck undertook the development of a PDE10A radioligand useful for clinical studies of new candidate drug molecules[53] and employed HTS to identify a scaold (Figure1.3) with encouraging properties of moderate ligand binding (K
=130 nM), lipophilicity (clogP=3.9), and polar surface area (PSA=75). Syntheses of a
i
series of derivatives of that scaold identied four compounds with high anity for the PDE10A binding site, each of which was then radiolabeled with carbon-11 and studied in rat and rhesus monkey brains. The result was the selection of [ as a high anity (K
=0.15 nM), highly selective in vivo radioligand for the PDE10A
i
binding site.
11
C]MK-8193 (Figure1.5)
Figure 1.5 Tar-
geted radiophar­maceuticals based on structures derived from high-throughput screening.
(A)
O
N
N
O
HTS “hit” PDE10A K
N N
H
tau Ki = 14 nM b-amyloid Ki = 134 nM
O
N
= 130 nM
i
O
N
N
11
C]MK-8193
[ PDE10A K
N
F
N N
tau Ki = 8 nM
b-amyloid Ki > 4400 nM
O
i
O
N
= 0.15 nM
H
3
O
N
14 Handbook of Radiopharmaceuticals