Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_3793_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
09.09.2026
Размер:
18 Мб
Скачать
252 PART IV Noncoronary Diseases: Diagnosis and Management
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 25.1 Basic mechanisms of supraventricular tachycardia (SVT). Typical atrial flutter (Aflutter)
is a reentrant circuit around the tricuspid valve in the right atrium. Atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia (AVNRT) is reentry within the atrioventricular node (AVN) and perinodal tissue. Orthodromic AVNRT is a reentry circuit that traverses down the AVN and up a bypass tract, leading to a narrow QRS. In antidromic atrioventricular reentry tachycardia (AVRT), conduction is first down the bypass tract and then up the AVN, leading to a wide QRS complex. Atrial tachycardia
(AT) is an ectopic focus of atrial activity at a faster rate than the sinus node. Atrial fibrillation (AFib) is several simultaneous wavelets in the atrium with variable conduction through the AVN.
Multifocal atrial tachycardia (MAT) involves at least three distinct ectopic atrial foci. (From Link MS. Clinical practice: evaluation and initial treatment of supraventricular tachycardia. N Engl J Med. 2012;367[15]:1438–1448.)
Fig. 25.2 Atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response.
CHAPTER 25 Diagnosis and Treatment of Unstable Supraventricular Tachycardia 253
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 25.3 Typical atrial flutter with variable conduction. Typical negatively deflected flutter waves
are seen in the inferior leads with positive flutter waves in V be difficult to distinguish from atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia; adenosine can be used to increase the degree of atrioventricular block and unmask the flutter waves.
. 2 : 1 atrial flutter can sometimes
1
occur in different locations within either atrium, are less common, and are typically observed in patients with prior atrial fibrillation ablations or cardiac surgeries. The flutter rate is usually around 300 beats/min, with the ventricular rate determined by the degree of AV node block. Acute atrial flutter presents with a rapid rise in ventricular rate to about 150 beats/min, consistent with 2 : 1 AV node block. The ventricular rate can be irregular if there are varying degrees of AV node block. Typical sawtooth-appearing flutter waves can be seen on the surface ECG.
Atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia (AVNRT; Fig. 25.4) is a reentry circuit within the AV node or perinodal tissue characterized by a rapid-onset, regular tachycardia with a rate typically between 150 and 250 beats/min. There are two pathways within the AV node with different conduction properties. The difference in conduction allows for a premature atrial contraction (PAC) or premature ventricular contraction (PVC) to stimulate conduction down one pathway while the other is refractory. At the right timing, conduction can then propagate retrograde up the previously refractory pathway, thereby initiating a continuous circuit within the AV node. Conduction of the atria (retrograde) and ventricle (anterograde) occur almost simultaneously in this setting; this is reflected in an ECG that shows a P wave that is either buried in the QRS complex or occurs just shortly after it (pseudo S wave in inferior leads).
Atrioventricular reentry tachycardia (AVRT) is a reentry circuit involving the AV node and an atrioventricular bypass tract some distance from the AV node. Like AVNRT, it is precipitated by a PAC or PVC and is characterized by a rapid onset with a ven­tricular rate between 150 and 250 beats/min. If conduction occurs initially down the AV node and then retrograde up the bypass
tract, depolarization of the His-Purkinje system and synchronized ventricular contraction occur and the QRS complex is narrow (orthodromic AVRT). A retrograde P wave is typically seen further after the QRS than in AVNRT. If conduction occurs down the bypass tract first, there is slow myocyte-to-myocyte ventricular depolarization with subsequent retrograde conduction through the AV node, leading to a wide QRS complex on surface ECG (antidromic AVRT). A prior ECG can be helpful in establishing the diagnosis, as it may identify preexcitation down a bypass tract characterized by a short PR interval with a delta wave (Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome).
Atrial fibrillation with conduction down an accessory pathway (Fig. 25.5) is of concern, as it can lead to ventricular fibrillation. Rapid irregular depolarization of wavelets within the atrium can conduct directly down the bypass tract into the ventricle without protection by the AV node, leading to a wide complex irregular tachycardia with a ventricular rate that can be greater than 250 beats/min.
Atrial tachycardia (Fig. 25.6) involves an ectopic atrial pace- maker that can overtake the rate of the sinus node. These tachycardias are more likely to occur under a state of sympathetic activation and thus are more common in the ICU. Atrial tachy­cardia is characterized by an acute-onset, regular tachycardia with a ventricular rate generally less than 220 beats/min. There is often a slow increase in rate (warm up) over the first 5 to 10 seconds. Atrial tachycardia is also characterized by frequent short bursts. The ECG is characterized by a regular ventricular rate and a P wave morphology distinct from the P wave in sinus rhythm that depends on the anatomic origin of the ectopic atrial ac tivity.
254 PART IV Noncoronary Diseases: Diagnosis and Management
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 25.4 Typical atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia. Regular narrow complex tachycardia
with pseudo–S wave pattern seen in inferior leads and retrograde P wave seen shortly after the QRS in lead V1.
Fig. 25.5 Preexcited atrial fibrillation characterized by a bizarre, wide complex irregular
tachycardia.
CHAPTER 25 Diagnosis and Treatment of Unstable Supraventricular Tachycardia 255
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 25.6 Atrial tachycardia with 2 : 1 atrioventricular block. Note the P waves in lead III that do
not appear to be sinus P waves. The 2 : 1 atrioventricular pattern is most clearly seen in lead V1.
Multifocal atrial tachycardia (MAT) involves the presence of multiple ectopic atrial pacemakers with a faster rate than the sinus node. The ECG shows an irregular ventricular rhythm with at least three distinct P wave morphologies and variable PR intervals. MAT is associated with severe pulmonary disease, often during an acute exacerbation. Thus MAT is not uncommon in the ICU.
THERAPY
The therapy for SVT outlined is largely consistent with the 2015 American Heart Association (AHA) Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS)4 guidelines and the 2015 American College of Cardiology (ACC)/AHA/Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) SVT guidelines.5 Patients with SVT should be initially evaluated for hemodynamic instability. This includes assessment of blood pressure, cardiopulmonary status, mental status, and peripheral perfusion by physical examination.
If it is clear that the SVT is causing hemodynamic instability, it should be immediately treated with synchronized DCCV, regardless of the exact rhythm. Adequate sedation should be provided during the procedure if tolerated hemodynamically. Pads should be placed on the chest with the heart between the pads. The initial voltage of cardioversion depends on the suspected arrhythmia based on QRS width and regularity of the tachyar­rhythmia. Cardioversion can be repeated at a higher voltage if initially unsuccessful. A second set of pads may be applied to the patient’s chest to increase the voltage, especially for patients with a large body habitus. Repeated recurrence of SVT should prompt consideration for the use of an antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) and consultation with an electrophysiologist.
For patients who have a regular tachycardia that causes symptoms but are hemodynamically stable, vagal maneuvers
should be performed to temporarily block AV node conduction. Vagal maneuvers include carotid massage, having the patient bear down, and application of ice-cold water to the face. Per­formed appropriately, vagal maneuvers can terminate AV node–dependent reentrant arrhythmias (AVNRT, AVRT) in up to 20% of patients.6 A modified Valsalva maneuver with transition from a sitting to supine position with passive leg raise after Valsalva strain was shown to improve the success rate for car­dioversion to about 43% in the REVERT trial.7 For SVT due to enhanced automaticity or due to non-AV node–dependent reentrant arrhythmias (atrial fibrillation, atrial tachycardia, atrial flutter, MAT), vagal maneuvers may temporarily block AV node conduction to unmask atrial activity. This can be useful diagnosti­cally, especially during 2 : 1 atrial flutter when typical flutter waves may not be easily discerned without increasing the degree of AV node block.
For patients who do not respond to vagal maneuvers, adenosine should be administered. Adenosine is a short-acting endogenous nucleotide that blocks AV node conduction for a few seconds. Its half-life is very short, as it is metabolized by red blood cells; the drug should be administered rapidly via a large-bore IV and flushed with saline. Like vagal maneuvers, adenosine is useful therapeutically and diagnostically, as it can terminate AV node– dependent reentry SVT or unmask atrial activity with increased AV node block. Caution should be taken in administering the drug to patients with significant reactive airway disease, as it can cause bronchospasm. Patients who have undergone heart transplantation are particularly sensitive to adenosine and should receive a smaller dose. Adenosine can precipitate atrial fibrillation in up to 10% to 15% of patients after administration. of consequence with antidromic AVRT, as conversion to atrial fibrillation in this setting can cause rapid conduction down the atrioventricular bypass tract and lead to hemodynamic instability.
8
This is
256 PART IV Noncoronary Diseases: Diagnosis and Management
https://t.me/medicina_free
In addition to adenosine, β-blockers and nondihydropyridine
calcium channel blockers (diltiazem, verapamil) can also be used to block the AV node and suppress node-dependent reentrant tachycardias. Caution should be exercised with the use of these agents in a critically ill patient given a longer half-life and more potently negative inotropic effects than adenosine. AV nodal blockers are also effective in controlling the ventricular rate of atrial tachyarrhythmias.
An AAD can be administered to cardiovert patients with SVT, to facilitate DCCV, or to promote maintenance of sinus rhythm. The most commonly used AAD used in the acute setting by intensivists is the class III drug amiodarone. The drug has properties of all the major classes in the Vaughan Williams–Singh antiarrhythmic classification and is less likely to be proarrhyth­mogenic than other AADs. Amiodarone is frequently used to control the rate of atrial fibrillation and to prevent recurrence after spontaneous or DC cardioversion. Use of amiodarone long term should be limited given its toxicities (thyroid, pulmonary, liver, skin). Other AADs may be used in consultation with and electrophysiologist depending on the clinical scenario.
Unlike most other SVTs, preexcited atrial fibrillation frequently causes hemodynamic instability. Vagal maneuvers, adenosine, or other nodal-blocking agents should not be used as they have no effect on the conduction of the bypass tract. Prompt DCCV or administration of procainamide or ibutilide
are reasonable initial management options, with subsequent consideration of accessory pathway ablation. Procainamide is a class Ia antiarrhythmic that blocks sodium channels; it causes decreased conduction velocity manifested on the ECG with a widening of the QRS complex. It works primarily by modifying the accessory pathway conduction and decreasing the degree of preexcitation. Ibutilide is an intravenous class III antiarrhythmic that terminates preexcited atrial fibrillation by cardioverting it to sinus rhythm. It can cause potent QTc prolongation; thus pads should be placed on the patient’s chest and potassium and magnesium levels should not be low. Ibutilide should be avoided if the patient has significant hypokalemia or hypomagnesemia.
After conversion of SVT to sinus rhythm or after achievement of hemodynamic stability, attention should shift to potential precipitating causes of SVT and ongoing arrhythmia management. Consultation with an electrophysiologist should be considered, especially for AV node reentrant arrhythmias, accessory pathways, or atrial flutter, as these arrhythmias are readily amenable to ablation. Ablation should be performed when the patient is hemodynamically stable and the underlying factors predisposing to SVT have been addressed.
The full reference list for this chapter is available at
ExpertConsult.com.
CHAPTER 25 Diagnosis and Treatment of Unstable Supraventricular Tachycardia 256.e1
https://t.me/medicina_free
REFERENCES
1. Link MS. Clinical practice. Evaluation and initial treatment of supraventricular tachycardia. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(15):1438–1448.
2. Annane D, Sébille V, Duboc D, et al. Incidence and prognosis of sustained arrhythmias in critically ill patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008;178(1):20–25.
3. Marill KA, Wolfram S, Desouza IS, et al. Adenosine for wide­complex tachycardia: efficacy and safety. Crit Care Med. 2009;37(9):2512–2518.
4. Editorial Board. 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation. 2015;132:S313–S314.
5. Page RL, Joglar JA, Caldwell MA, et al. 2015 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline for the Management of Adult Patients With Supraventricular Tachycardia: A Report of the American College
of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67(13):e27–e115.
6. Smith GD, Fry MM, Taylor D, Morgans A, Cantwell K. Effectiveness of the Valsalva Manoeuvre for reversion of supraventricular tachycardia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;(2):CD009502.
7. Appelboam A, Reuben A, Mann C, et al. REVERT trial collaborators.. Postural modification to the standard Valsalva manoeuvre for emergency treatment of supraventricular tachycardias (REVERT): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2015;386(10005):1747–1753.
8. Strickberger SA, Man KC, Daoud EG, et al. Adenosine-induced atrial arrhythmia: a prospective analysis. Ann Intern Med. 1997;127(6):417–422. Erratum in: Ann Intern Med 1998 Mar 15;128(6):511.
OUTLINE
https://t.me/medicina_free
Acute Aortic Regurgitation, 257
Etiology, 257 Pathophysiology, 258 Clinical Presentation, 259 Diagnosis, 259 Treatment, 261
Aortic Stenosis, 262
Etiology, 262 Treatment, 262
Post–Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Aortic
Regurgitation, 263
Post–Left Ventricular Assist Device Aortic Regurgitation,
264
Acute Mitral Regurgitation, 264
Etiology, 264 Pathophysiology, 265 Clinical Presentation, 265
26
Acute Presentations of
Valvular Heart Disease
Ruth Hsiao, Daniel Blanchard, Barry Greenberg
Diagnosis, 265 Treatment, 267 Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation, 268
Acute Prosthetic Valve Dysfunction, 269
Etiology and Clinical Presentation, 269 Diagnosis, 270 Treatment, 271
Congestive Heart Failure, 271 Prosthetic Valve Endocarditis, 271 Prosthetic Valve Thrombosis, 272
Tricuspid Regurgitation, 272
Etiology, 272 Clinical Presentation, 273 Diagnosis, 273 Treatment, 274
Conclusion, 274
Acute deterioration in valvular function represents a tremendous challenge to the practicing clinician. The presentation of valvular emergencies is usually dramatic; a thorough knowledge of predis­posing etiologies, hemodynamic abnormalities, and therapeutic modalities is essential to making appropriate management deci­sions. Despite an increasing population of patients with prosthetic valves, a resurgence of rheumatic fever, and the continued rise in intravenous drug use–associated infective endocarditis, the overall incidence of valvular emergencies in cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) settings is low. However, the consequences of a missed diagnosis or a delay in therapy can be devastating. Therefore, an important guideline is to always entertain the possibility of acute valvular dysfunction in a patient presenting with hemodynamic instability or acute congestive heart failure.
This review focuses primarily on acute dysfunction of the aortic and mitral valves leading to severe regurgitation and aortic valves leading to acute stenosis. The unique valvular complications associated with prosthetic valves and acute tricuspid regurgitation will also be discussed. Finally, valvular complications associated with mechanical assist devices will be addressed.
ACUTE AORTIC REGURGITATION
Etiology
Aortic regurgitation occurs as a result of either dilation of the aortic root and annulus or disruption of the valve leaflets. The most common etiologies of acute aortic regurgitation are infec­tive endocarditis and aortic dissection.1 Infective endocarditis is more likely to occur in a congenitally abnormal or rheumatically involved valve; it results in acute aortic regurgitation through a process of endothelial damage, development of nonbacterial thrombotic vegetation, adherence of circulating organisms to the vegetation, proliferation of infection within the vegetation, and progressive valve destruction. tion is complicated by some degree of aortic regurgitation in approximately 50% of cases. regurgitation by direct extension of the dissection to the base of the aortic valve leaflets, dilation of the sinuses with incomplete coaptation of the leaflets at the center of the valve, involvement of a valve commissure leading to inadequate leaflet support, and/ or prolapse of the dissection flap across the aortic valve into
2
Acute, type A, aortic dissec-
3,4
Aortic dissection can lead to aortic
257
CHAPTER 26 Acute Presentations of Valvular Heart Disease 257.e1
https://t.me/medicina_free
Keywords
acute valvular heart disease acute heart failure acute valve regurgitation acute valve stenosis acute valve dysfunction acute prosthetic valve dysfunction
258 PART IV Noncoronary Diseases: Diagnosis and Management
160
LV volume (mm/m
)
Acute
LV pressure (mm Hg)
https://t.me/medicina_free
BOX 26.1 Etiologies of Acute
Aortic Regurgitation
Infective endocarditis Aortic dissection—predisposing and associated conditions
Hypertension Marfan syndrome Congenital bicuspid aortic valve Coarctation of aorta Ehler-Danlos syndrome
Turner syndrome Chest trauma Rupture of a myxomatous valve Systemic connective tissue disorders
Ankylosing spondylitis
Systemic lupus erythematosus Granulomatous diseases
Tertiary syphilis
Giant cell arteritis
Takayasu arteritis
the left ventricular outflow tract in diastole, impeding leaflet closure. Other etiologies of acute aortic regurgitation are listed in Box 26.1.
40
30
20
10
0
Fig. 26.1 Diastolic pressure-volume relationships in the left
ventricle. Acute regurgitation is sudden volume loading of the left ventricle without the benefit of adaptive ventricular remodeling. It results in the left ventricle functioning on the steep portion of the normal curve (dotted line). Chronic regurgitation is volume loading in the presence of a remodeled ventricle. It shifts the curve to the left and allows normalization of left ventricular (LV) filling pressure at significantly increased LV volumes. Hypertrophy (e.g., aortic stenosis) shifts the curve to the right and results in a noncompliant ventricle that is highly dependent on atrial booster pump function for LV filling. (From Hall RJ, Julian DG. Diseases of the Cardiac Valves. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1989; 291.)
Hypertrophy
Normal
200406080 100 140120
regurgitation
Chronic regurgitation
2
Pathophysiology
The presentation of acute, severe aortic regurgitation differs significantly from that of chronic aortic regurgitation owing to the dramatic hemodynamic changes that occur when the unadapted left ventricle (LV) is suddenly required to augment total stroke volume in order to maintain normal forward flow while simultaneously being exposed to a substantial increase in volume overload. The basic function of the heart is to maintain cardiac output commensurate with body demands. In the normal setting, it does so while operating on the flat portion of the curvilinear LV diastolic pressure-volume relationship and filling pressures remain low. Cardiac output is the product of heart rate and forward stroke volume. Forward stroke volume is the total stroke volume minus the regurgitant volume. Under normal circumstances, the latter is negligible so that total and forward stroke volumes are synonymous.
In acute, severe aortic regurgitation, the large regurgitant volume imposed on the unprepared LV markedly reduces forward stroke volume and shifts the LV diastolic pressure–volume relationship to the steep ascending portion of the curve. Because the LV and its surrounding pericardium have limited distensibility, acute increases in LV end-diastolic volume due to regurgitant flow result in an abrupt rise in LV end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) (Fig. 26.1). This leads to a rapid increase in the ventriculoatrial gradient, which can cause the mitral valve to close prematurely before the onset of the next systole. This is beneficial in that the high LVEDP is not transmitted to the pulmonary venous system and it offers a degree of protection against the development of pulmonary edema. However, protection owing to premature mitral valve closure can be lost if a further rise in the ventricu­loatrial gradient reopens the mitral valve in late diastole, leading to diastolic mitral regurgitation. Systolic mitral regurgitation
can also manifest from the persistent ventriculoatrial gradient as a result of extension of the high LVEDP level to the isovolumic contraction period during early systole, causing mitral valve opening. This mitral regurgitation is usually effective in lowering the LVEDP and the left atrium (LA) essentially serves as a reservoir for blood that has regurgitated from the aorta to the LV. However, left atrial pressure may rise further, leading to pulmonary edema.
5
Coronary ischemia can complicate acute aortic regurgitation as a reduction in diastolic coronary flow leads to a decrease in myocardial perfusion, while elevated LVEDP and tachycardia increase myocardial oxygen demand. Diastolic coronary flow may be reduced by a reduction in diastolic blood pressure in the aorta, elevation of diastolic pressures in the LV, and by the adverse effects of regurgitant flow on forward flow into the coronary vessels owing to the Venturi effect. The supply-demand mismatch that develops in the setting of acute aortic regurgitation is worsened further if obstructive coronary lesions are present or when aortic dissection impairs coronary flow.
6
To further complicate the picture, reflex sympathetic activation, in response to a reduction in cardiac output and systemic blood pressure, produces tachycardia and increases systemic vascular resistance (SVR). This rise in SVR further worsens regurgitant flow and impedes ejection of blood from the LV to the aorta so that a rise in aortic systolic pressure is inhibited. In some cases, the LV and aortic diastolic pressures are equalized. As opposed to chronic aortic regurgitation, aortic diastolic pressure usually does not fall significantly in the acute setting for two reasons: (1) the rapid increase in LVEDP reduces the driving gradient between the aorta and LV and (2) peripheral runoff is limited by an increase in SVR.
7,8
CHAPTER 26 Acute Presentations of Valvular Heart Disease 259
https://t.me/medicina_free
Clinical Presentation
The clinical features of aortic regurgitation are profoundly different in the acute compared to the chronic setting. These differences include the presence of markedly elevated LVEDP and absence of a wide pulse pressure in patients with acute severe aortic regurgitation. Because compensatory structural changes in the LV develop gradually over time, the presentation of an additional volume load imposed by acute aortic regurgitation on the unprepared LV may lead to the rapid onset of severe congestive heart failure or cardiogenic shock.
9,10
Detection of aortic regurgitation can be difficult in the acute setting; it is often misdiagnosed as another acute condition, such as sepsis, pneumonia, or nonvalvular heart disease.
5
Patients with acute aortic regurgitation typically present with severe dyspnea, weakness, or hypotension. They are often tachycardic. The LV impulse may be normal in both location and duration. Owing to early mitral valve closure from the rapid elevation of LVEDP and consequent reversal of pressures between the LV and LA in late diastole, the first heart sound is often soft or inaudible. Occasionally, mitral valve closure may be heard during diastole and accompanied by diastolic mitral regurgitation.
11,12
The Austin-Flint murmur, which is thought to represent turbulent flow from the LA to the LV because of partial mitral valve closure from the aortic insufficiency jet, is either absent or brief and ceases when LV pressure exceeds LA pressure in diastole.
13,14
An accentuated pulmonic closure sound suggests elevated pulmonary arterial pressure. A third heart sound (S3) is frequently heard. A fourth heart sound (S4), however, is usually not present because the mitral valve is either closed before atrial systole occurs or LVEDP is already so high that there is little flow to the ventricle during this period. The acute aortic regurgitation murmur is characteristically short, early, and of medium pitch, unlike the long, high-pitched murmur of chronic aortic regurgitation. In tachycardic patients, this diastolic murmur can easily be overlooked. Edema and weight gain are not often seen in severe acute aortic insufficiency because there is inadequate time for substantial secondary salt and water retention. The extremities may be cool and mottled owing to both poor cardiac output and elevated SVR. Peripheral manifestations characteristic of chronic aortic regurgitation, such as wide pulse pressure and others (e.g., Quincke’s pulse, water hammer pulse), are uncommon in the acute setting. Clinical features seen in acute and chronic aortic regurgitation are listed in
Table 26.1.
Diagnosis
The diagnosis of acute aortic regurgitation should be considered in the differential of any patient presenting with acute pulmonary edema or circulatory collapse. A history of known valvular disease, evidence of infective endocarditis, long-standing hypertension, Marfan syndrome, or chest trauma should make one particularly suspicious. Initial diagnostic testing in patients suspected of having acute aortic regurgitation includes an electrocardiogram (ECG), chest radiograph, blood cultures (if infective endocarditis is suspected or if the patient has a prosthetic valve), and a transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE).
TABLE 26.1 Clinical Features of Severe
Aortic Regurgitation
Feature Acute Chronic
Congestive heart
failure Rhythm Sinus tachycardia Regular rate Point of maximal
impulse Pulse pressure Normal Widened Heart sounds
S
1
S
2
S
3
S
4
Aortic regurgitation
murmur Cardiac output Decreased Normal LVEDP Increased Normal LV size Normal Increased
LV, Left ventricle; LVEDP, left ventricular end-diastolic pressure.
An ECG is required in all patients with pulmonary edema, primarily to rule out acute myocardial infarction (MI). The ECG can also be helpful in the patient with acute aortic regurgitation to identify evidence of myocardial ischemia or injury that results from the hemodynamic perturbations that adversely affect the myocardial supply and demand ratio. The ECG in acute aortic regurgitation may be normal with a left axis deviation. With early LV volume overload, there can be Q waves in leads I, aVL, and V3 to V6. As disease progresses, the prominent initial forces decrease but total QRS amplitude increases.
In the absence of preexisting heart disease, the chest radiograph generally reveals a normal cardiac silhouette with evidence of pulmonary edema (Fig. 26.2). A widened aortic root suggests the presence of dissection. Noninvasive imaging by TTE provides crucial information regarding the presence, severity, and etiology of the valve lesion. With severe aortic regurgitation, in addition to visualizing the regurgitant jet with color Doppler, quantitative measurements, such as jet or vena contracta (narrowest portion of regurgitant jet immediately distal to valve orifice) width, can be obtained (Fig. 26.3, Video 26.1). A jet width greater than 65% of LV outflow tract and vena contracta greater than 0.6 cm are consistent with severe aortic regurgitation.5 Continuous wave Doppler is used to calculate the pressure half-time, which reflects the equilibration between aortic and LV diastolic pressure. With acute, severe aortic regurgitation, the rapid equilibration of pres­sures results in a short pressure half-time of less than 300 msec.15 Other echocardiographic findings supportive of severe aortic regurgitation include premature closure of the mitral valve, detected best by M-mode echocardiography and holodiastolic flow reversal in the descending aorta (Fig. 26.4). Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) may be required in individuals in whom transthoracic echo windows are limited. In addition, TEE has increased sensitivity for evaluating the underlying etiology of aortic regurgitation, such as endocarditis (vegetations or aortic root abscess; Fig. 26.5, Video 26.2) or aortic dissection (dissection
16,17
flap).
Rapid and sudden Insidious
Not hyperdynamic and
nondisplaced
Soft or absent Soft Soft A2, accentuated P2 Normal P2 Present Absent Absent Usually absent Soft, early Holodiastolic
Hyperdynamic and
shifted inferolaterally