Добавил:
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Clinical nursing practice. Study aid for foreign students of medical university

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
07.09.2026
Размер:
2 Мб
Скачать
41
Emotional and psychological factors are important in determining people's pain experiences. The cycle pain leading to stress, stress lead­ing to more pain can be difficult to break. Pain assessment needs to acknowledge the influence of factors which alter people's perception and experience of pain. Nursing care needs to be directed towards pain preven­tion as well as the cure or management of pain. This can be achieved by planning care to decrease people's sensitivity to pain and avoiding factors which heighten pain sensitivity.
3.3. ASSESSING THE PERSON WHO IS EXPERIENCING PAIN
The person’s subjective experience should be taken as the starting
point when assessing need, planning and implementing care, and evaluat­ing its effectiveness or otherwise, in partnership with the person experienc­ing the pain. The person's description of the pain and observation of his or her reaction to it are the two main methods of assessing the person in pain.
Assessment of pain is concerned with finding out about the:
Location(s) of the pain.
Intensity and duration of the pain.
Character of the pain.
Factors which seem to bring on the pain.
Person's past experience of pain.
Person's reaction to the pain.
Things which seem to help or relieve the pain.
Effective pain assessment is a prerequisite for pain control and relief and is an essential component of nursing care. In the assessment process, the nurse gathers information from the patient or client that allows an un­derstanding of the person’s experience and its effect on his or her life. The information obtained guides the nurse in planning and evaluating strategies for care. Pain is rarely static, therefore its assessment should be an ongoing process.
Assessment seeks to identify all the factors physical and non­physical which affect the person's perception of pain. It is important to
42
note that research and clinical practice suggest that patients and clients tend not to report pain or do so inadequately or inaccurately, minimizing the pain experience. Hunt et al. found that nurses tended to overestimate the pain relief obtained from analgesia and to underestimate the level of the patient's pain.
Using pain assessment tools. A number of methods or tools have been developed to help in the assessment of pain and the ongoing evalua­tion of pain relief strategies. The published literature suggests that “pain assessment charts” can be helpful tools in assessing and monitoring the person's pain. These should not be used indiscriminately but they have been found to improve communication between staff and patients/clients. They can be particularly valuable where the person is able to participate actively with the nurse in the process of assessing, monitoring and evaluat­ing and where interventions are likely to make some improvement in the person's pain experience. Walker et al, however, found that charts ap­peared to have little value in cases of unresolved or intractable pain.
Evidence suggests that pain assessment tools need to be designed to meet the specific needs of different client groups and different types of pain. It is important therefore that you select the tool which is most appro­priate for a particular type of pain experience. It would not be appropriate, for example, to use a pain assessment chart, designed for use with pa­tients/clients with chronic pain, to assess post-operative pain.
3.4. SETTING GOALS FOR PAIN MANAGEMENT
The concept of partnership between the nurse and the person experi­encing pain is continued throughout each stage of the nursing process whenever possible. The principles of goal setting described are used to es­tablish appropriate short-term and longer-term outcomes for the person experiencing pain.
Establishing the desired outcome and being able to achieve it is not straightforward in pain management. The management of chronic pain, in particular, is complex and often may only consist of helping the person to
43
cope with their pain. Hanks for example, suggests that in setting goals for people with pain due to cancer, the goals need to be progressive and work towards an overall goal. One example is by setting goals related to the time of day and activity of the person.
The goal for harmful or potentially harmful pain, such as that experi­enced following surgery or in severe injury, is the immediate relief or re­duction of the pain, in order to avoid potential shock and collapse.
3.5. PLANNING INTERVENTIONS TO RELIEVE OR MEDIATE THE EFFECTS OF PAIN
Exercise
Either on your own, or even better, with a group of colleagues, try
to recall all of the different interventions that you have used to relieve pain when caring for people.
Now make a list of all the measures you have used to relieve your own pain. How many of these are in the list of interventions that you have used for people you have cared for? Are there any that are not? Why do you think this is?
Now compare your list of interventions with tab. 2, below.
Table 2
Nursing interventions in the management of pain
1. Assessment and advocacy to ensure good practice and participation by the person in their overall pain management.
2. Analgesic and other drug administration.
3. Support ...[for the person's] own methods of pain control. Externally fo- cused such as rocking, rubbing, “flight into activity”, seeking companions. Internally focused such as vigilant focusing, mind-body separation, fanta­sy. Avoidance strategies such as posture, stillness, sleep.
44
4. Teaching of, and assisting with, ... coping strategies. Distraction tech- niques such as guided imagery, mental focusing. Relaxation techniques.
5. Non-invasive physical therapies. Cutaneous stimulation such as pres- sure, massage, vibration, heat, cold, external analgesia, transcutaneous
nerve stimulation.
In the next part of this section we will use examples from the care of children undergoing painful or potentially painful procedures to look at some of the ways of reducing pain and anxiety and evaluating these inter­ventions.
3.6. REDUCING PAIN AND ANXIETY IN CHILDREN
Anxiety, pain and distress are interlinked to an even greater extent in children, particularly when a child is faced with an acute clinical situation and one that may be repeated frequently. An initial traumatic experience may result in the child developing an acute conditioner response to treat­ments such as repeated venipuncture. It is importee therefore to assess all the systems that may reflect pain and anxiety behavioral, cognitive (self­report) and physiological. The interlinking of these responses varies, and individuals may exhibit certain response in different systems at different times.
Research undertaken on a pediatric oncology unit into children: un­dergoing bone-marrow aspiration suggests that the level of pain and dis­tress experienced by those under seven years of age is five to ten times greater than that of older children.
The behavior and support of the parents is also a factor in a child’s: ability to cope. Jay et al. state that there is a definite relationship between parental anxiety and the child's distress, and that parent: provide a model for the child's behavior. A calm, supportive parent will help both child and nurse.
45
Assessing pain in children:
1. Note the frequency, duration and intensity of the pain.
2. What factors make the pain better or worse? Are environmental
factors involved? Does the presence of a specific person lessen pain and anxiety?
3. If the child is vocalizing his or her pain, is the vocabulary accu-
rate? As one three-year-old child said: “I've got tummy-ache in my head”.
A popular assessment tool to measure a child's pain is the faces scale (fig. 4): five faces represent degrees of pain and/or anxiety, and the child points to the face depicting his or her own feelings. The idea of using color drawings, with red depicting pain for example, is also becoming popular.
Fig. 4. Faces scale to assess child’s pain
Pain scale/description
Instructions
Recommended age
FACES Pain Rating Scale; consists of six cartoon faces ranging from smiling face for “no pain” to tearful face
Explain to child that each face is for a person who feels happy because there is no pain (hurt) or sad because there is some or a lot of pain. Face 0 is very happy because there is no hurt. Face 1 hurts just a little bit. Face 2 hurts a little more. Face 3 hurts even more. Face 4 hurts a whole lot, but Face 5 hurts as much as you can imagine,
although you don’t have to be crying
to feel this bad. Ask child to choose face that best describes own pain. Record number under chosen face on pain assessment record
Children as young as 3 years
Adequate pharmacological control must be used as and when neces­sary. Additional or alternative methods of reducing pain and anxiety will
46
also help the child to relax and cope better with pain and distress. As well as benefiting the child, this can have a directly positive effect on parents and other careers.
Preparation prior to a procedures such as venipuncture is useful, but does not teach the child a coping skill. It does, however, offer the child an opportunity to question, and this may reduce their fears and fantasies about what might happen. A five-year-old boy was told by the anesthetist that he was going to be 'put to sleep' for an operation. Given the opportunity to talk about his fears, the child explained that his dog had been taken to the veterinary clinic the week before to be ‘put to sleep’ - in other words to be humanely destroyed. Nurses were able to allay his fears by explaining that, unlike his pet, he would wake up after the operation.
For the child who is in hospital, it is often beneficial if his or her bed is kept as a safe place and, where possible, invasive procedures are per­formed elsewhere.
Methods used to reduce pain and anxiety. Outlined below are some of the methods used to reduce pain and anxiety in the child. Remem­ber that a relaxed child will cope with pain and anxiety better, and that both pain and anxiety will be reduced if the child is able to focus on some­thing other than the procedure.
Participation. The child is encouraged to participate in the procedure by, for example, choosing the site for an injection, cleaning the site or se­lecting a plaster.
Desensitization. The child is helped to undergo the procedure in a re­laxed, rather than a distressed, state. The use of play with safe syringes, if appropriate, dolls, puppets or a third party who undergoes the procedures first have all proved helpful. Introducing sensory triggers such as the smell of med swabs and chlorhexidine can also help at this stage.
Distraction. Questioning the child to discover what he or she likes, and then using this knowledge, is enormously beneficial. A favorite story or song, a joke or a pop-up book can provide distractions for the small child. Blowing bubbles or an imaginary feather off the doctor's nose will also distract the child and encourage deep breathing. A personal stereo may be an appropriate distractor for the older child.
47
Relaxation. In addition to deep breathing, massage and stroking will aid relaxation. The child may benefit from squeezing his or her mother's hand very tightly while counting to five, and then relaxing the grip slowly.
Guided imagery technique. With this technique, control is not re­moved from the child, as it with hypnosis: he or she can still hear external noises such as a ringing telephone. The principles of the technique, as demonstrated in the first of the two case studies which follow, involve at­tention focusing followed by progressive relaxation. Then, through guided imagery, the child is given the idea that pain is being reduced. Once the procedure has been completed, the child is guided back to full wakeful­ness. This technique is guided imagery and not hypnosis, which should on­ly be performed by a trained therapist.
A combination of techniques can be used and may be backed up by positive reinforcement, such as awarding a bravery certificate or a gold star.
The case studies described below illustrate how the techniques de­scribed have been used in practice. They are drawn from the experience of nurses working at the Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children in England.
Example: case study Kristina.
Kristina was ten years old when she was admitted to the neurosurgi­cal unit. She was a shy but friendly child who was fond of the babies on the ward but was reluctant to mix with her own age group.
Kristina underwent a craniotomy for repair of a nasal encephalocele which had caused repeated bouts of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) rhinorrhoea and carried the risk of her developing meningitis. She was psychologically prepared for her operation and care, and went through the whole experi­ence apparently undisturbed. Unfortunately, a wound breakdown, and the risk that she might develop osteomyelitis, entailed a long course of intra­venous antibiotics. She also developed viral diarrhea, which meant she had to be isolated in a cubicle. She would clock-watch, waiting until the time for her next antibiotics, and would become extremely distressed when a nurse entered the room with the drugs. She was always pleased to see nurses who went into her cubicle for any other reason.
48
Two of the senior nurses on the ward and the play specialist, had been taught relaxation methods by the unit's psychologists and decided that relaxation and guided imagery would be used as the best method to help relieve Kristina's distress. The procedure was discussed with Kristi­na, who was wary but curious. After discussion with her parents, through a translator, it was agreed to try it out. She was asked to think of a very special place she wanted to go to in her “dream”, and to describe it. She described a walled garden. The play specialist and a nurse would enter the cubicle and sit quietly with Kristina. When she was settled and comforta­ble, the play specialist would ask Kristina to lift her own thumb level to her face, her arm outstretched and follow her thumb with her eyes as her hand fell downwards and her eyes gradually closed. The play specialist would then verbally guide Kristina slowly down the ten steps to the garden gate. She would open the gate, go into her garden and close the gate be­hind her. Nobody could enter the garden without her invitation. She could smell and touch the flowers.
While Kristina was in this relaxed state, the intravenous drug would be given. Sometimes she would smile when she realized what was happen­ing, but would remain relaxed as the play specialist continued talking to her about the garden. When the procedure was completed, the play spe­cialist would guide Kristina out of the gate and back up the steps, then she would ask her to open her eyes. Somebody would remain with her until she felt “normal”, as she described it. She loved the technique, including the extra attention from staff. After a short time, Kristina would become re­laxed as soon as anybody entered the cubicle to administer drugs and the technique was continued successfully for ten days. It then appeared to wear off and she again began to show signs of distress so a hand­squeezing technique was used with success.
Six weeks after discharge, Kristina visited the ward for a follow-up scan. She was calm and cheerful during her stay, and no invasive proce­dures were performed.
Example: case study Karen.
Karen was 13 years old when she was admitted with benign intra­cranial hypertension. The cause of this condition, in which the child pre-
49
sents with headache and papilloedema, is unknown but appears to be ei­ther cerebral oedema or defective cerebrospinal fluid absorption which results in increased brain bulk. Treatment is through steroid therapy, in conjunction with intermittent lumbar puncture, performed as a day-case admission, every three or four weeks, until the condition settles or until surgical intervention becomes necessary by means of a lumbar peritoneal shunt.
Karen was highly distressed by the lumbar puncture procedure, and therefore amenable to any suggestions as to how we might reduce her pain and anxiety during her treatment. Temazepam was administered orally on the day of the procedure, and the use of local lignocaine was maintained in the usual manner once she had relaxed. To achieve this, several tech­niques were used after discussion with Karen and her mother. They had a very close relationship, which made it particularly valuable to involve Karen's mother fully.
Karen would make herself as comfortable as is possible for this pro­cedure, lying on a trolley supported by pillows. Her mother would then en­courage deep, slow breathing while stroking and massaging her daughter. The two of them would then talk quietly and closely of the holiday they would have when Karen was better.
Karen did not need any form of physical restraint during the proce­dure and would fall asleep when it was completed. Although she clearly did not enjoy the lumbar puncture, she found the coping methods made it tolerable.
Example: case study Brian.
Brian was five years old when he required a revision of his shunt sys­tem for hydrocephalus. He had required no further surgical intervention or hospitalization since his shunt had been inserted when he was five weeks old. It was likely that he would require further surgery at a later stage in his life, and the staff were keen to minimize his trauma on this occasion.
Brian's greatest fear was needles: his own experience of injections when he was immunized and the cries of other children when they had in-
50
jections were the cause of his fear. The nursing staff explained what was to happen to him during his pre-medication injection and gave him an empty syringe to play with. His condition was deteriorating and he did not wish to select an injection site or plaster.
The play leader helped him to relax by getting him to blow bubbles, imitating deep breathing, as we gave his pre-medication injection. This technique also proved calming whenever he was given post-operative an­algesia. Brian's parents were pleased to see that every opportunity was be­ing used to reduce his distress, and supported any attempts to do so.
Evaluation note. Psychological approaches to reducing a child's pain and anxiety can prove useful. They can be used on their own or in con­junction with pharmacological aids. These techniques are time-consuming and require patience and persistence, but as they may well result in a child experiencing less pain and distress, they should be considered valid tools for use when appropriate.
3.7. CONCLUSION
The complexity of the experience of pain and pain relief may mean that our understanding of the mechanisms involved may always be incom­plete. There is a need for further research, particularly into the experience and alleviation of chronic or “useless” pain. The biomedical approach to pain management has yielded many pharmacological and other develop­ments in pain management, but does not hold all of the answers. There has perhaps been an over-reliance in the last century or so, on interventions which can be understood from a bio-medical perspective. The case studies illustrate the value of approaches to pain relief which are based on an un­derstanding of the person experiencing the pain and a willingness to be­lieve in non-pharmacological interventions.
The presence of pain, and the desire for it to be alleviated, is a major reason why people consult the health care services. The absence of pain may not be an achievable goal in all instances. Patients/clients understand