Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_2817_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
X
- •The Nervous System
- •The Nervous System
- •ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
- •SERIES EDITOR FOREWORD
- •PREFACE
- •CONTENTS
- •Introduction
- •Gross anatomy of the spinal cord and vertebral column
- •Spinal cord cell types
- •Receptive fields
- •Somatosensory pathways
- •The discriminative touch system
- •The ventrolateral system: pain and temperature
- •Spinoreticular tract
- •Spinotectal tract
- •The proprioceptive system
- •Functional organization of the spinal cord
- •Summary of somatosensory pathways
- •Blood supply to the spinal cord
- •Damage to the spinal cord
- •Imaging the spinal cord
- •Pathophysiology of spinal cord injury
- •Spinal cord syndromes
- •Complete cord transection
- •Spinal cord hemisection (Brown–Séquard syndrome)
- •Anterior cord syndrome
- •Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
- •Infective diseases: poliomyelitis and syphilis
- •Syringomyelia
- •Management of spinal cord injury and future therapies
- •Comments on the case history
- •Introduction
- •Internal organization of the brainstem
- •Reticular formation
- •Principal functions of the RF
- •Mediating behavioural responses: arousal, alertness and affect
- •Modulating pain perception
- •Modulating spinal and cranial motor functions (muscle tone, reflexes and body posture)
- •Coordinating motor survival (autonomic) centres
- •Blood supply to the brainstem
- •Brainstem reflexes
- •Pupillary light reflex
- •Accommodation reflex
- •Gag reflex
- •Jaw jerk reflex
- •Blink reflexes
- •Brainstem lesions
- •Comments on the case history
- •Introduction
- •Physiological control of cerebral blood flow
- •Blood supply to the brain
- •Main terminal branches of the anterior system
- •Main terminal branches of the posterior system
- •Venous system
- •Functional anatomy of the cerebral vasculature
- •Angiography
- •Stroke
- •Classification of stroke
- •Mechanisms of cell injury in ischaemic stroke
- •Rehabilitation of stroke patients
- •Prognosis for recovery
- •Head injury
- •Focal pathology in relation to vascular injury
- •Skull fractures
- •Meninges
- •Extradural haemorrhage
- •Subdural haemorrhage
- •Subarachnoid haemorrhage
- •Brain contusions and lacerations
- •Intracerebral (parenchymal) haemorrhage
- •Diffuse pathology
- •Concussion and chronic traumatic encephalopathy
- •Treatment of head injury
- •Comments on the case history
- •Introduction
- •Types of infection of the central nervous system
- •The meninges
- •Dura mater
- •Arachnoid mater
- •Pia mater
- •Cerebrospinal fluid production and circulation
- •The blood–brain barrier
- •Meningitis
- •Bacterial meningitis
- •Aseptic and viral meningitis
- •Diagnosis and treatment of meningitis
- •Treatment of meningitis
- •Encephalitis
- •Cerebral abscesses
- •Brain infections in the immunocompromised patient
- •Introduction
- •Classification of mood disorders
- •Clinical features of mood disorders
- •Non-pharmacological management
- •Electroconvulsive therapy
- •Other stimulation therapies
- •Psychotherapy
- •Bipolar disorder and its treatment
- •General comments on mood disorders
- •Treatment resistance in depression
- •Need for new therapeutic targets
- •Comments on case history
- •Anxiety disorders
- •Genetics of mood disorders
- •Neurobiology of depression
- •Structures involved
- •Neurochemistry
- •Treatment of depression
- •Pharmacological management
- •Treatment of anxiety disorders
- •Insomnia
- •Introduction
- •Addiction and drug misuse: general comments
- •Neurobiology of addiction
- •Opiates
- •Cocaine and crack
- •Cannabis
- •Nicotine
- •Alcohol
- •Phencyclidine
- •Amphetamines
- •Methylenedioxymethamphetamine—‘Ecstasy’
- •Hallucinogens
- •Solvents
- •Addiction and rehabilitation: general comments
- •Index

5
A Presynaptic inhibition B Postsynaptic inhibition
PAIN AND ANALGESIA
Projection neuron
(lamina I)
Serotonergic axon
inhibits release of
neurotransmitter
from nociceptor
Descending
noradrenergic or
Nociceptor
(Aδ/C)
Axon to
anterolateral
tract
Fig. 5.5 Spinal cord mechanisms of descending inhibition. (A) Presynaptic inhibition; (B) Postsynaptic inhibition. See text for details.
by this stimulation activates the inhibitory interneurons
even more powerfully than noradrenaline and so blocks
pain transmission. However, 5- HT may not be specifically involved in the inhibition of pain transmission, as
serotonergic agonists do not have significant analgesic
effects. 5- HT neurons appear to inhibit all somatosensory
transmission and may have a function in the initiation of
sleep. A complicating factor is that 5- HT receptors are
found in many locations in the dorsal horn, including on
C fibres, and different 5- HT receptor subtypes mediate
different effects of 5- HT.
serotonergic input
from brainstem
Myelinated (Aβ)
non-nociceptor input
the adrenal gland, to inhibit the activity of specific
immune cells by activating their β2 adrenergic or D1
receptors. Additionally, by activating the splenic lymphocytes to induce release of acetylcholine, splenic macrophages can be inhibited. This raises the possibility that
differential activation of selective neural circuits by electrical stimulation (by using a device akin to an electrical
pacemaker) may provide a way to selectively inhibit
local inflammatory responses without suppressing the
entire immune system, thereby reducing adverse effects
or infections.
Inhibitory
interneuron
Axon to
anterolateral
tract
Projection neuron
Nociceptor
(Aδ/C)
Acupuncture analgesia
Acupuncture is a Traditional Chinese Medicine technique used to treat pain by inserting needles into specific
points in the body (acupoints) and then either manually
or electrically activating the deep tissue afferents to produce analgesia. There are several mechanisms by which
analgesia is thought to occur. Electrical stimulation of the
needles appears to work in a manner similar to TENS, by
locally activating gate control. Increasing the intensity
recruits the supraspinal descending pathways to produce analgesia via the release of endogenous opioid neurotransmitters. Some suggest that acupuncture is a form
of distraction or diffuse noxious inhibitory control,
whereby pain in another part of the body distracts the
subject from the primary locus of pain. Electrical stimulation can also activate catecholamine nuclei within the
brainstem to promote descending analgesia. Most
Recent work has clarified the mechanisms involved in
the analgesia seen during intense excitement or arousal.
During arousal the sympathetic nervous system is active
in the body. Sympathetic fibres activate the slow pain
pathways (STT and SRT) whose axons ascend to activate
noradrenergic cells in the LC. Noradrenergic axons project back down to the spinal cord (via the dorsolateral
funiculus) and synapse on the cells in laminae I– II, forming a feedback loop. Some lamina II cells contain the
inhibitory transmitter GABA, and they in turn synapse
on the cell bodies of large lamina I cells and on the distal
dendrites of lamina V cells. Activation of the central noradrenaline system excites the inhibitory interneurons of
lamina II and thus inhibits the lamina I STT cells, blocking pain transmission. Therefore, agents that increase
noradrenergic transmission have analgesic potential.
recently, a subgroup of sensory afferents innervating
deep tissues have been discovered by researchers at
Harvard University that have the ability to selectively
inhibit inflammation. They act on the vagal nerve to produce the release of noradrenaline and dopamine from
areas such as the hypothalamus or the amygdala, stimu-
lates the PAG to induce analgesia. This is involved in the
‘fight- or- flight’ reaction that produces hypoalgesia in life-
threatening situations, for example, on the battlefield.
Arousal analgesia
Additionally, activity from autonomic-related brain
99THE NERVOUS SYSTEM

5
Fear
(chronic pain)
deprivation
PAIN AND ANALGESIA
Sleep
Fig. 5.6 The vicious psychological circle of pain. Untreated pain
that persists for any length of time can cause fear and anxiety. If the
pain fails to resolve, patients become depressed and lose confidence
in themselves and their doctors. Sleeplessness may exacerbate the
problem. (Adapted from Wall PD, Melzack R. (1994) Textbook of pain.
Churchill.)
Psychology of pain
Emotions are central to the experience and expression of
pain. Signs of emotional distress are the most frequently
recognized evidence that a patient is in pain. The most
common emotional aspects associated with pain are anxiety (that the pain will get worse), fear (that it may ultimately kill or severely impair them), and depression
(that the pain may never go away or get better) that set
up a vicious circle of pain that dominates the patient’s
life both in acute and chronic pain states (Fig. 5.6). Other
emotions may be present such as aggression, anger, guilt
or in some individuals, sexual arousal. Emotional distress is thus not only a component of pain but results
from pain and can cause further pain; all these facets
require the doctor’s attention. In part, this helps to
explain why drugs such as antidepressants are effective
at relieving pain.
No two people’s experience of pain is the same, and
there are many psychological factors that affect pain.
These are summarized in Table 5.6. There is evidence
linking levels of pain perception with the opening or closing of the pain gate in the spinal cord. The gate can be
opened or closed depending upon the messages received
from the brain. This provides a psycho- physiological
basis for factors that modulate chronic pain. This is summarized in Table 5.7.
While relatively little is known about the mechanisms
involved, the limbic system and in particular, the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis that is involved in the
stress response, have been implicated. Dysfunction of
this pathway has been implicated in some chronic pain
conditions such as arthritis and fibromyalgia.
(acute pain)
Helplessness
(chronic pain)
Pain
Anxiety
(acute pain)
Depression
Table 5.6 Psychological factors influencing pain responses
Prior experience
Cognitive appraisal (meaning of pain)
Mental attitude e.g. fear, anxiety, stress
Cultural beliefs
Personality (neuroticism or extroversion)
Coping strategies (attention, distraction, biofeedback)
Medication
Sex differences
Table 5.7 Factors that regulate spinal gate control
Gate open Gate closed
Physiological C/Aδ fibres active Aβ fibres active
Medical Extent of injury
Insufficient medication
Cognitive Focus on pain Distraction
Emotional
state
Behavioural:
personality
Anxiety
Fear
Stress
Depression
Introvert Extrovert
Sufficient medication
Reinterpretation of pain
Happy, optimistic
Relaxed
Rested
Prior experience of pain
Identification of factors that help reduce pain perception allows psychological management strategies to
be employed in conjunction with pharmacotherapy.
These include cognitive- behavioural therapies that
change the patient’s beliefs and perceptions of pain,
educating the patient about their understanding of
pain and addressing pain behaviour rather than the
pain perception. One important psychological factor is
the placebo effect or the expectation that the doctor
will make the patient better (Box 5.3). Biofeedback
(relaxation) techniques can be used to modify biological aspects of pain that produce changes in physiological parameters, for example, skin temperature and
EMG activity have proven beneficial. Similarly, attention and/or distraction strategies that construct a separate image or reinterpret the pain can be very
effective at reducing perceived pain levels.
Measuring pain
Several methods can be used to measure pain. The most
common is a medical interview when patients are asked
to use a rating scale. These scales range from verbal rating scores to visual analogue scales and box scales (Fig.
5.7) and the McGill Pain Questionnaire that consists of 78
adjectives organized into 20 groups based on similarities
100 SYSTEMS OF THE BODY

Box
A Visual analogue scale
imaginable
imaginable
pain
Flare response
(ANS fibres)
Site of damage
(hypoalgesic/analgesic)
A
in response to heat
A
in response to touch stimuli
A
in response to touch only
The placebo effect
5.3
Placebo is Latin for ‘I shall please’. Its main use is as a control to test the efficacy of new drugs in clinical conditions.
Placebos can be pills, injections or even surgical procedures,
and the patient who receives one believes that they have
been given the ‘good drug’ that will alleviate their symptoms. In this regard, the placebo can be a powerful analgesic but there is great variability in patient responses. The
biochemical basis and mechanism of action of placebos
remain unclear. Several hypotheses have been suggested to
account for its actions. Firstly, that it reduces pain perception by reducing anxiety levels. Secondly, that expectancy
can account for the observed changes. Lastly, that the placebo effect is a case of Pavlovian conditioning, whereby
association with the drug induces positive emotional
responses. The placebo effect does have a physiological basis, as its analgesic effect can be antagonized by the
opioid antagonist naloxone. Recent research suggests that
the placebo effect can activate the dopaminergic reward
system. Thus, the suggestion or belief that a treatment will
work is enough to cause the release of endogenous opioids
that may activate anti-nociceptive mechanisms and other
neurotransmitters such as dopamine. The placebo response
may also play a role in other alternative medical treatments
such as hypnotherapy and acupuncture.
5
PAIN AND ANALGESIA
rea of primary hyperalgesia
rea of primary hyperalgesia
rea of secondary hyperalgesia
Fig. 5.8 Areas of analgesia flare, and primary and secondary
hyperalgesia to different stimuli, after tissue injury. ANS, Autonomic
nervous system.
response to pain such as grimacing, vocalization, limping
etc. Lastly, there are physiological measures, such as
changes in threshold for activation, autonomic activity
changes (heart rate, skin temperature), or evoked potentials from reflex activity. Imaging techniques can also be
used to measure changes in brain activity in patients in
pain.
Pain mechanisms after tissue damage:
peripheral and central sensitization
No pain
B Verbal rating scale
No pain
C Varni –Thompson paediatric scale
Severe
Fig. 5.7 Psychological evaluation of pain using rating scales. (A) Visual
analogue scale where the patient marks a point along a line indicating
their pain level. (B) Verbal rating scale where the patient rates the
score on a scale of 0–10 where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain
imaginable. (C) Paediatric pain scale using smiley or sad faces to
indicate the level of pain.
in pain quality. It offers the patient the opportunity to
describe their pain using emotional and sensory descriptors. A pain rating is based on the scale value of the
words, and the patient’s personal interpretation of the
pain is also considered. Non-verbal scales use behavioural assessments based on stereotypical behaviours in
0 12345678910
Worst pain
Worst pain
No pain
Normally, nociceptors require intense stimuli to activate
them. However, pain sensation does not follow the firing
pattern of nociceptors in a simple, predictable fashion.
The central processing of this input in terms of summation of afferent input and inhibitory interactions is very
important.
Peripheral tissue injury produces two types of change
within the nervous system: peripheral sensitization, which
is manifest as a reduction in the threshold for nociceptor
activation, and central sensitization, an activity- dependent
increase in the excitability of CNS neurons. Together they
contribute to the post- injury hypersensitivity that is common in chronic pain syndromes.
Peripheral injury induces a decreased pain threshold
at the site of injury, coupled with a variable loss of sensory input directly at the site of injury and in the surrounding tissue. The former is the area of primary
hyperalgesia and is responsive to both thermal and
mechanical stimuli, and is mediated by C fibres, while
the latter is the area of secondary hyperalgesia that is
only responsive to mechanical stimuli and is mediated
by Aβ fibres. In addition, a flare response (reddening of
the skin) due to activation of the sympathetic axons
occurs, causing release of neuroactive substances that
may potentiate the sensitization process (Fig. 5.8).
Much has been learned about the molecular mechanisms of peripheral sensitization after focal nerve or
inflammatory injury. This is summarized in Fig. 5.9.
101THE NERVOUS SYSTEM

5
Mast cells, neutrophils
Peripheral
To brain
SP release
DRG
Release
of glutamate
and peptides
injury
PAIN AND ANALGESIA
Skin
Fig. 5.9 Mechanisms of peripheral sensitization. Peripheral injury results in the creation of an acidic inflammatory ‘soup’ containing peptides,
histamine, bradykinin, protons, adenosine, cytokines, serotonin and prostaglandins. These excite the appropriate receptors on the nociceptors
causing activation of protein kinase A and C, leading to phosphorylation of various ion channels and receptors. This results in a lowering of
the activation threshold and the excitability of the membrane increases. A secondary consequence of nociceptor activation is the induction of
neurogenic inflammation, caused by the release of neuropeptides causing vasodilation and plasma extravasation of proteins from the blood
stream, and activation of non-neuronal cells which in turn contribute substances to the inflammatory ‘soup’. CGRP, Calcitonin gene-related
peptide; DRG, dorsal root ganglion; S P, substance P.
Tissue damage leads to the production of an inflammatory ‘chemical soup’ that activates the various receptors
on nociceptors (see Table 5.4). This leads to alterations in
signal transduction sensitivity and also a change in the
distribution of receptors, with down- regulation of some
and upregulation of others. Primary hyperalgesia is
mediated by a lowering of the activation threshold of
sensitized Aδ and C fibres. It is thought that the major
function of NSAIDs is to prevent peripheral sensitization
by inhibiting prostaglandin production, an effect
achieved by blocking the action of the enzyme cyclooxygenase (COX).
Peripheral sensitization induces a nociceptive afferent
barrage that triggers excitability changes in spinal cord
neurons, a response that outlasts the stimulus input.
These changes are manifest as changes in RF size, lowered threshold for activation and increased responsiveness, as a direct result of the recruitment of previously
subthreshold inputs. Central sensitization is responsible
for the secondary hyperalgesia seen after injury. The
input from Aβ fibres produces pain by changes in the
sensory processing by spinal cord neurons and not by
changes in the threshold for activation.
The molecular mechanisms of central sensitization are
well understood. Noxious stimuli cause the release of the
fast excitatory transmitter glutamate that acts at ionotropic
(α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid
(AMPA), N-methyl-D aspartate (NMDA)) and metabotropic glutamate receptors. Neuropeptides such as substance P are co- released, which produce a slow, progressive,
excitatory potential that gives the afferent the opportunity
Inflammatory
mediators
Peripheral
sensitization
Plasma
extravasation and
vasodilation leading to
neurogenic inflammation
Nociceptor
activation
Neuropeptide release
(SP/CGRP)
Blood vessel
• Altered gene
expression
Activity
to produce progressively increased response in neurons
when repeatedly activated, due to summation of these slow
potentials. They activate second messenger cascades to produce increased intra- cellular calcium levels that depolarize
the cell, resulting in phosphorylation of ion channels and
receptors, alteration of gene expression, and upregulation
of molecules such as prostaglandins and COX enzymes
(Fig. 5.10). Not surprisingly, central sensitization can be pre-
vented by drugs that target the NMDA receptor such as
ketamine, COX2 selective inhibitors such as rofecoxib, or
neuropeptide receptor antagonists such as NK1 antagonists.
Neuropathic pain mechanisms
Chronic pain is a common symptom of neurological disease, and current pharmacotherapy strategies remain far
from satisfactory. This is partly due to the fact that the
pathophysiological mechanisms of pain remain incompletely understood. Neuropathic pain can be caused by a
variety of insults (Table 5.8) and classified by site of ori-
gin (Table 5.9) or response to drug treatments. Recently,
clinicians and scientists have begun to address the mechanisms involved in different types of pain. An example
of this is the neuropathic pain that occurs in peripheral
neuropathy induced by partial nerve damage. This
causes a cascade of changes at different sites along the
damaged nerve and at the first synapse in the spinal cord
that lead to the generation of spontaneous (stimulusindependent) pain or evoked (stimulus- dependent) pain
(Fig. 5.11).
102 SYSTEMS OF THE BODY

TTX
Dorsal horn
Gly receptor
5
PAIN AND ANALGESIA
neuron
EP
EP
AMPA
NK
NMDA
mGluR
1
Table 5.9 Classification of some common forms of neuropathic
Peripheral Spinal Brain
Neuropathy Spinal stroke Stroke
Amputation Spinal cord injury Multiple sclerosis
Nerve injury Multiple sclerosis Cancer
Avulsion Cancer
Radiculopathy Syringomyelia
Trigeminal neuralgia Arachnoiditis
Cancer Syphilis
Herpes zoster
Primary
afferent
nociceptor
SP
Fig. 5.10 Molecular mechanisms of central sensitization. Prolonged activation of nociceptors results in stimulation of postsynaptic neurons by glutamate
and neuropeptide release, leading to activation of multiple signalling pathways that result in the phosphorylation of AMPA and NMDA receptors, leading
to central sensitization by lowering the threshold for activation so that subthreshold inputs become suprathreshold and produce action potentials.
Cells can regulate their own activity and that of the primary afferent by release of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) and nitric oxide (NO). AMPA and NMDA
(α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid and N-methyl-D-aspartate), Ionotropic glutamate receptors; COX-2, inducible isoform 2 of cyclooxygenase; E P, prostaglandin receptor; ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinases; Gly, glycine receptor; IP3, inositol triphosphate; mGluR, metabotropic
glutamate receptors; NK1, neurokinin receptors; NOS, nitric oxide synthase; PKA, protein kinase A; PKC, protein kinase C; TTX, tetrodotoxin-sensitive and
tetrodotoxin-insensitive sodium channels.
Table 5.8 Causes of neuropathic pain
Cause Example
Mechanical trauma Neuropathy, avulsion
Compression Disk herniation, carpal tunnel syndrome
Inflammation Arthritis
Infection Herpes zoster, syphilis
Toxicity Cisplatin, taxol, vincristine
Disease Cancer
Ischaemia Thalamic syndrome, angina
Metabolic Diabetes
Immune HIV, multiple sclerosis
Autonomic Complex regional pain syndrome
Glu
PGE
2
ERK
PKC
PKA
+IP
3
NO
pain by site
COX-2
NOS
Ca
2+
Nucleus
Gene
transcription
between injured and uninjured nerve fibres,
Several important nervous system mechanisms have
been identified.
Peripheral mechanisms include:
1. Ectopic impulse generation (spontaneous activity)
occurs at the site of injury (neuroma) or the spinal
ganglion or dorsal roots of injured afferents.
Abnormal sodium channel expression or
redistribution is thought to be responsible for these
changes. The pain quality is described as
lancinating or shock- like burning pain.
2. Ephaptic connections (involving interactions
generated by electrical fields created by neurons)
leading to ectopic discharges in injured fibres
evoking spontaneous activity in uninjured ones
(i.e. amplifying the central signal).
3. Abnormal chemical sensitivity develops in primary
afferents (phenotypic switching) so that they become
sensitive to substances they were not responding to
prior to injury, such as catecholamines.
Central mechanisms include:
1. Central sensitization of spinal cord cells due to the
injury barrage, ongoing spontaneous activity in
uninjured and injured axons, or release of
neuroactive substances from glial cells.
103THE NERVOUS SYSTEM

5
Uninjured axon
Injured axon
Peripheral nerve Spinal cord dorsal horn
PAIN AND ANALGESIA
Wallerian
degeneration
Fig. 5.11 Changes associated with primary afferents after peripheral nerve injury. Axotomy produces a range of effects at distinct sites along the
nerve and in the spinal cord that may contribute to pathological pain (see text for further details). DRG, Dorsal root ganglion.
2. Disinhibition of spinal cord cells due to afferent
cell death, atrophy or decreased supraspinal
inhibition, or loss of inhibitory neurotransmitters
such as GABA.
3. CNS plasticity in the form of degenerative and
regenerative events that result in structural
rearrangements of neuronal connections, leading
to permanent aberrant connections.
4. Changes at one level of the nervous system leading
to subsequent pathophysiological changes at more
rostral levels of the neuraxis, for example, thalamus
and cortex that can lead to altered sensory
perceptions such as phantom limb pain (Box 5.4).
Sympathetic
axon sprouting
Injured DRG
• Cell death
• Altered phenotype
• Spontaneous activity
Injury site
• Injury discharge
• Inflammatory reaction
• Long term ectopic discharge
• Neuroma formation
Ephaptic
connections
Uninjured DRG
• Altered phenotype
• Spontaneous activity
as ‘activated’). Once activated, glia produce and release
pro-inflammatory cytokines, pro- nociceptive growth factors and prostaglandins that activate pain signalling cascades, disrupt inhibitory circuits and cause neurotoxicity.
This also offers another potential avenue for pain control.
For example, the drug minocycline, which selectively
inhibits activated microglia, is in clinical trials for pain
associated with spinal cord injury. Additionally, the
expression of specific receptors that can act as biomarkers
for these two main glial phenotypes has been identified.
Metabolic reprogramming of neurotoxic glial phenotypes
by targeting glucose metabolism to modulate their phenotype back toward their normal homeostatic functions
may become a future treatment option.
Primary
afferent
sprouting
Mechanical/thermal
hypersensitivity
Central
sensitization
Cell death
Terminal
atrophy
Postsynaptic neurons
• Altered phenotype
• Changes in synaptic connectivity
Disinhibition
Spontaneous
activity
104 SYSTEMS OF THE BODY
Glial cells and neuropathic pain
Traditionally, the primary role of glial cells is described in
terms of neuronal support, especially for their energy
demand, as the bioenergetic coupling between neurons
and glia (e.g. lactate shuttling and ATP production) is crucial for normal function. However, the past decade has
revealed their roles in the development and maintenance
of neuropathic pain. Glial cells possess many of the same
characteristics as neurons, such as expressing the same
receptors and synthesizing and releasing neurotransmitters. Nerve injury and inflammation induce glial cell activation, and recent evidence points to a role for activated
glial cells in chronic pain associated with bone cancer and
infectious diseases. These conditions change the glia phenotype from having a homeostatic role (described as ‘resting’) to being a pro- inflammatory phenotype (described
Pharmacology of pain
Pain is a very common symptom that accompanies a
variety of pathological states. Therefore analgesia, that is,
the relief of pain, is an essential component of many integrated therapeutic strategies. Pain can be acute or
chronic, as described in detail above, and its temporal
evolution and severity may be unpredictable and pose a
real challenge to the clinician. This is exemplified by the
case history (see Box 5.1). Unfortunately, at present pain
is still managed inadequately in spite of the availability
of a wide range of treatments. This inadequacy is due in
some instances to the complex nature of pain itself. In
other cases, poor pain management is due to misplaced
fears as to the adverse effects of analgesics.
The previous review of the pain pathways and of the
local circuits involved in nociception and pain shows
that multiple neurotransmitter systems, at various levels

Box
Phantom limb pain
5.4
5
PAIN AND ANALGESIA
Phantom limb pain occurs in many amputees that suffer a
traumatic accident (see Box 5.1). It also occurs in avulsion (i.e.
extrusion of nerve roots) injury patients. The sensations occur
when an area of the body which is not damaged is touched
and elicits pain sensations that feel as though they originate
in the amputated region. For example, stroking the face can
elicit phantom pain in arm amputees or stimulating the genitalia can elicit phantom pain in lower limb amputees.
For the brain to perceive a phantom it must recognize
that a body part is no longer present. This raises the intriguing question of whether the brain has an innate map of the
body or if body image is generated from peripheral sensory
input. One theory suggests that the brain contains an innate
body image—a neural network that is genetically determined
but modulated by the environment. If this ‘neuromatrix’ is
deprived of modulating input, it produces an abnormal signature pattern that can result in phantom sensations. This
theory can account for phantom sensations in congenital
amputees and children, although in these cases the phantoms
are rarely painful.
The mechanisms behind phantom limb pain remain incompletely understood but involve plasticity at several levels of the
nervous system. This is the remapping hypothesis. Damage to
the peripheral nerves causes a deafferentation syndrome (i.e.
loss of input). The spontaneous pain is thought to arise from
either the nerve neuroma (a disorganised tangle of nerve
fibres at the site of nerve damage) or from loss of input to CNS
cells causing spontaneous firing in the absence of input. The
deafferentation also causes a change in the balance between
excitatory and inhibitory inputs to cells. A loss of inhibition leads to an ‘unmasking’ of preexisting silent synapses of
adjacent uninjured nerves that under normal conditions only
provide a subthreshold input to cells but are not manifest as
part of the normal receptive field. Following injury, these subthreshold inputs become suprathreshold and now evoke action
potentials in neurons in response to stimulation of the periphery. The receptive field of such cells in the deafferented spinal
cord thus appears to change in response to injury. This remapping procedure occurs at subsequent levels of the brainstem,
thalamus and cortex and can be explained in terms of overlap
of adjacent afferents from different parts of the body.
The somatosensory and motor cortices contain distorted
body maps—the homunculus—for (see Figs. 4.6 and 9.11) sensory input and motor output, respectively. Due to disinhibition
of cells caused by the injury, the area of cortex adjacent to the
deafferented cortex gradually ‘invades’ the silent region and
cells become responsive to the new input. In arm amputees, the
face somatosensory cortex is adjacent to the arm cortex in the
map, and this area now activates the previously arm responsive
area of cortex. Thus a stimulus to the face now produces sensations that are perceived as originating from the face and also
from the amputated arm (Fig. 5.12). Increased activity from
cells in the deafferented motor cortex may be responsible for
the cramping- like pain that many patients experience. This is
thought to arise because these cells fire impulses to the amputated region but receive no feedback. The strength of the signal increases in order to try to get a response, making the pain
worse. Interestingly, clinical studies using electrical motor cortex
stimulation or a mirror box to create the illusion of the missing limb, or the use of a prosthetic limb have all been found to
reduce the levels of phantom pain in patients.
To conclude, human pain conditions often involve a collection of different mechanisms, often activated concomitantly.
Therefore it is unlikely that only one drug can provide relief
in complex cases.
F
F
UA
Fig. 5.12 Schematic representation of results from positron
emission tomography (PET) studies showing expansion (arrows) of
facial somatosensory cortex and upper arm cortical regions into
the deafferented hand and forearm cortical regions (dotted circle)
following upper limb amputation. On the contralateral side, each limb
region has its own distinct cortical representation. H, Hand; F, face
regions of the somatosensory homunculus; UA, upper arm.
H
UA
of the neuraxis, may constitute therapeutic targets in
pain management.
Analgesic drugs may affect different aspects of noci-
ception. They may:
• actatthesiteofinjuryanddecreasethepainasso-
ciated with inflammatory reactions (e.g. NSAIDs)
• alternerveconduction(i.e.localanaesthetics)
• modifytransmissionofnociceptiveinformationin
the dorsal horn of the spinal cord (e.g. opioids and
antidepressant drugs)
• activatedescendinginhibitorycontrols(e.g.
opioids)
105THE NERVOUS SYSTEM

5
A general strategy used to control pain is described in
the World Health Organization Analgesic Ladder, which
was initially introduced in 1986 for patients with cancer
pain (Box 5.5). The original ladder has three levels or
‘rungs’. On the first rung (i.e. at the first level), aspirin,
paracetamol, or other NSAIDs are given to relieve pain.
Next, weak opioid drugs can be introduced (such as
codeine, tramadol or dextropropoxyphene). Finally, the
third rung is represented by strong opioids such as morphine, hydromorphone, fentanyl, buprenorphine and
PAIN AND ANALGESIA
methadone. Other non-opioid drugs can be used in combination with opioids in order to potentiate the pain-
Box
Cancer pain
5.5
In the UK the likelihood of developing cancer is now more
than one in three, and one in four will die from the disease.
Cancer mainly affects the elderly, with 65% of cases occurring
in those aged over 65 years.
The symptom that is feared by most cancer patients
is severe pain; pain is the first symptom in 25%–50% of
patients, and two- thirds of cancer patients require pain treatment during the course of their disease, with the incidence
rising in terminal cancer patients. Clinically used anti-neoplastic drugs such as taxol, vincristine and cisplatin, are limited
in their use because they cause painful paraesthesias due to
toxic damage to the peripheral nerve fibres.
Bone cancer pain is the most common cause of cancerrelated pain and represents a major clinical problem. Pain
associated with primary cancers originating in the lung,
breast, ovary or prostate is linked to the metastasis to bone.
Cancer patients report wide fluctuations in pain intensity,
varying from ongoing pain that is characterized as constant,
deep and aching in character, to intermittent episodes of
extreme intense pain that occurs spontaneously or more commonly with movement or weight bearing on a limb.
Treatment for cancer pain has been hampered by the
lack of knowledge of the basic neurobiology of mechanisms
underlying this type of pain and the lack of suitable models.
Treatment has been classically based on the ‘WHO analgesic
ladder’, starting with NSAIDs, followed by weak opioids such
as codeine and then strong opioid drugs such as morphine
(see Table 5.10). However, the efficacy of such drugs is rather
limited and they have many unwanted effects. Although
cancer pain is treated with opioids to provide round- theclock analgesia, patients often suffer from ‘breakthrough’
pain while taking the analgesic medication. Some opioid
drug formulations, e.g. ACTIQ® (oral transmucosal fentanyl
citrate), have been approved specifically for breakthrough
pain. ACTIQ dissolves through the mucous membranes in
the mouth and provides rapid pain relief within 5–10 min.
Patients find the drug easy to use and effective and they tolerate it well.
Breakthroughs in the understanding of cancer pain mechanisms have arisen with the advent of animal models of bone
relieving effects. This 3- step gradual approach was based
on the use of the two main categories of analgesic drugs:
non-opioid and opioid drugs. Pain specialists have proposed an update to this, to include a fourth rung (Table
5.10) because of the need for integrating non-pharmaco-
logical treatments. The updated ladder focuses on the
quality of life and is bidirectional, extending its usefulness to treat acute pain in that the strongest analgesic
required can be scaled up or down, according to the
intensity described by the patient. However, for chronic
pain, the ascending step- wise approach from bottom to
top continues.
cancer pain that closely model the human condition. In these
models, pain severity is directly related to bone degeneration.
Pain is thought to be due to tumour cells releasing cytokines
and growth factors that activate T cells and osteoclasts.
Osteoclast activity can be controlled by a molecule called
osteoprotegerin ligand (OPGL), also known as receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa- B ligand (RANKL), whose receptor is found on osteoclasts. Bone resorption can be blocked
by a naturally secreted decoy receptor called osteoprotegerin
(OPG), which binds to OPGL and prevents the activation of
osteoclasts. Treatment with OPG prevents bone destruction
and the secondary associated spinal cord changes and, most
importantly, it significantly reduces the breakthrough pain.
Bisphosphonates (e.g. zoledronic acid) are another example of drug class that could be used: they induce osteoclast
apoptosis. Finally, another approach involves the use of denosumab—a monoclonal antibody that inhibits RANKL and
leads to loss of osteoclasts. All these approaches lead to some
relief of pain. Bone degeneration is also associated with the
release of inflammatory mediators and lowered extracellular
pH that lead to the activation and sensitization of bone periosteum primary afferents. This is coupled with neurochemical changes in the spinal cord, particularly increased glial cell
activation. Glial cells are known to regulate excitatory amino
acid levels and activated cells are also a source of cytokines
and growth factors that will alter the surrounding neuronal
microenvironment. Ultimately, all these changes lead to the
induction of central sensitization, which contributes to pain
maintenance.
Table 5.10 Proposed change to the WHO Analgesic Ladder
1. Non-opioid analgesics; if pain persists or increases
2. Weak opioids and non-opioids; if pain persists or increases
3. Strong opioids and non-opioids; if pain persists or increases
4. Invasive and minimally invasive treatments e.g. epidural
anaesthesia, PCA pumps, neuromodulation techniques e.g.
spinal cord or deep brain stimulation, ablative surgery
PCA, Patient-controlled analgesia.
106 SYSTEMS OF THE BODY

5
Opioid receptors and ligands
The terms ‘opioid’ and ‘opiate’ are often used interchangeably, although they have a different meaning.
‘Opiate’ means that a substance is extracted from opium
or is similar in structure to natural substances present in
opium. Opium is the dried exudate obtained from unripe
seedpods of the poppy Papaver somniferum and contains
morphine, codeine and other alkaloid substances.
‘Opioid’ is a term that designates substances that are not
derived from opium. It refers particularly to opioid peptides, that is, endogenous compounds that bind to opioid
receptors and mimic the effect of morphine- like compounds. This term is now used to designate all agents
that act on opioid receptors. Morphine, the prototype
opioid drug, has been used for many centuries (Box 5.6).
Opioids and opiates bind to opioid receptors, which
are G- protein coupled receptors. Three main receptor
types have been identified: mu (μ) receptors, divided into
the splice variants μ1, μ2 and μ3; delta (δ) receptors,
divided into δ1 and δ2; and kappa (κ) receptors, divided
into κ1, κ2 and κ3 (although for the κ type the receptor
subtypes may arise from interaction of a single protein
with different membrane associated proteins).
Opioid substances that act as agonists at opioid receptors often have limited selectivity for a given receptor
type. Administered systemically, opioid agonists induce a
host of effects, which include analgesia. This complex
effect profile is a direct consequence of the widespread
distribution of opioid receptors in the brain and spinal
cord, and also at the periphery. The activation of each
main type of opioid receptor can be associated with certain predominant effects, as illustrated in Table 5.11.
Although opioid agonists, in particular at mu receptors,
can induce significant analgesia, their use is always associated with unwanted effects, some of which may become
life threatening, such as respiratory depression. The most
prescribed opioid drugs (e.g. morphine, fentanyl,
codeine), discussed below, preferentially target the mu
opioid receptors. Substances targeting these receptors are
responsible for the induction of analgesia and of almost all
prototypic opioid unwanted effects such as euphoria,
mental clouding, sedation, respiratory depression and
cough suppression, pupillary miosis, urinary retention,
nausea and vomiting, bradycardia and vasodilation, constipation and histamine release. Opioid agonists reduce
neuronal excitability by increasing potassium conductance
and can also inhibit neurotransmitter release by decreasing calcium influx that is required for exocytosis.
A range of opioid agonists, partial agonists and also
opiate antagonists is available in the clinic. These
drugs have unique pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics, as discussed below. The choice
of opioid drug used in a patient ideally should take
into account all these characteristics but in reality is
also influenced by the individual patient response to a
particular drug.
PAIN AND ANALGESIA
Box
Opium—a trail that goes back to the beginning of medical history
5.6
Opium has been known to mankind for millennia.
Egyptian papyri mention its medical uses and the Sumerians
describe the poppy as ‘the plant of joy’. Preparations based
on opium extracts have been used to treat cough and diarrhoea. In parallel to this, many cultures have become aware
of the addictive properties of opium.
The effects of morphine prompted a search for specific
receptors, which culminated with the discovery of opiate
receptors in 1973. This discovery was followed in 1975 by the
identification of the first endogenous opioid peptides, the
enkephalins. All the endogenous opioid substances discovered so far are peptides. Opioid peptides are produced following the general pattern of synthesis of neuropeptides.
They are synthesized as part of large protein precursors that
undergo extensive posttranslational maturation and, after
proteolytic cleavage, release the bioactive peptides.
The three main types of peptides, i.e. the enkephalins,
dynorphins and β- endorphin, derive from three different
precursors.
• Proopiomelanocortinistheproteinprecursorof
endorphin. Cells expressing this gene are concentrated
in the arcuate nucleus of the hypothalamus and βendorphin projections innervate extensively other
hypothalamic nuclei, limbic structures and the raphe
nuclei.
• Proenkephalinistheprecursorofenkephalins.This
precursor is expressed predominantly in interneurons.
• Prodynorphinistheprecursorofdynorphinsand
neoendorphins. Cells expressing the precursor are
present in several brain areas, particularly areas
involved in nociception, and also in the spinal cord.
Nociceptin/orphanin FQ and nocistatin are opioid- related
peptides that are synthesized as part of the orphanin FQ/
nociceptin protein precursor. As their name suggests, their
effects on nociception appear to be mutually antagonistic.
Nociceptin binds to the ORL1 receptor, which shows overall
60% homology with the three main opioid receptor types.
Nociceptin can induce strong nociception, whereas nocistatin
blocks these effects and has analgesic properties.
Endomorphin- 1 and endomorphin- 2 are two more additions to the large opioid peptide family. These short peptides
have very high affinity and selectivity for mu opioid receptors. Endomorphin- 1 appears to be more widely distributed
within the brain than endomorphin- 2, whereas the latter is
more prevalent in the spinal cord.
107THE NERVOUS SYSTEM

5
Table 5.11 Effects associated with the stimulation of opioid
receptor subtypes
Effects
Analgesia
Supraspinal +++ +/− −
Spinal ++ ++ +
PAIN AND ANALGESIA
Respiratory depression +++ ++ +
Pupillary constriction ++ − −
Reduced gastrointestinal
motility
Sedation ++ − ++
Euphoria ++ − −
Dysphoria − − +++
Dependence +++ − +/−
+++, Strong effect; +, weak effect; − , no effect.
Opioid analgesic drugs
Morphine is still the gold standard against which other
opioid analgesics are compared. It can be administered
via oral, intravenous, intramuscular, or subcutaneous
routes. Slow- release preparations are also available. The
drug undergoes significant first pass metabolism, so only
a small fraction reaches systemic circulation after oral
administration. One of the metabolites, morphine- 6glucuronide, is biologically active and induces significant
analgesia. The administration of morphine leads to pain
alleviation but also to respiratory depression, nausea and
vomiting, constipation, sedation, pupillary constriction
(‘pin- point’ pupil) and histamine release. The metabolite
morphine 6- glucuronide can accumulate in patients
whose renal function is impaired, which increases the
risk of respiratory depression.
Heroin (diamorphine) is a prodrug, which is metabolized to morphine (which is ultimately responsible for its
effects). Heroin is more lipid soluble than morphine,
therefore the effect after intramuscular administration
has a more rapid onset. Its properties make it particularly suitable for epidural administration to relieve postoperative pain after major surgery. Its higher solubility
also constitutes an advantage for subcutaneous infusion.
Codeine is an analgesic with lower efficacy than morphine (∼20% of the potency of morphine). Its analgesic
effect is due to demethylation in the liver to morphine. It
may be used in combination with aspirin or paracetamol,
and it also has a significant anti-tussive (suppression of
cough) effect. Like morphine, it induces constipation.
Pethidine is a synthetic substance that is more sedative and has a more rapid onset and a shorter duration of
action than morphine. Its metabolite, norpethidine, is
active and may accumulate to toxic levels in patients
Mu
receptors
++ ++ +
Delta
receptors
Kappa
receptors
with renal impairment. Its potency is 1/10th of that of
morphine.
Methadone is a synthetic compound with a half- life of
24–30 h. It has significantly higher bioavailability than
morphine after oral administration (∼80% vs 25%–30% for
morphine) and lacks active metabolites. Methadone has
activity at the mu opioid receptor; it also inhibits 5- HT
reuptake and is an antagonist at NMDA glutamate receptors. It leads to a much milder physical abstinence syndrome than morphine but can induce psychological
dependence. Methadone is routinely used in maintenance
programs for morphine and heroin addicts.
Fentanyl is a highly potent compound with a half- life
of 1–2 h. Fentanyl and related compounds (alfentanil,
remifentanil) can be given before or during induction of
general anaesthesia. The initial dose can be followed by a
prolonged infusion during the surgical procedure.
Fentanyl formulations are also used to treat breakthrough cancer pain (see Box 5.5).
Buprenorphine is a very lipid soluble compound,
which acts as a partial agonist at mu receptors. It is a
potent compound (50 times more potent than morphine)
but has less efficacy than morphine. Consequently, it
may lead to a re- emergence of pain in patients who have
received opioids with higher efficacy such as morphine.
It can be used sublingually, and it has a longer duration
of action than morphine but is more emetic. It may
induce dysphoria and sedation.
Tramadol is an atypical opioid that possesses antinociceptive and anti-hyperalgesic properties. It is an
attractive alternative to traditional opioid analgesics
because of its improved side effect profile, reduced abuse
potential and lack of tolerance and dependence.
Tramadol is effective in a broad range of moderate- tosevere types of pain. It acts weakly at mu receptors itself
but its metabolite desmetramadol has high affinity for
the receptors; tramadol also interacts with monoaminergic systems by blocking 5- HT and noradrenaline reuptake (but less effectively than tricyclic antidepressants).
Opioid antagonists
The opioid antagonist naloxone is used to reverse the
effects of opioid agonists. Naloxone is used in the management of opioid overdose or to relieve respiratory
depression in apnoeic infants after opioid administration
(e.g. pethidine) to the mother during labour. The half- life
of naloxone is short (<1 h), therefore repeated injections
may be required before reversal of the effect of an agonist
(which may have a much longer half- life than naloxone)
is achieved.
Important clinical issues in the use of opioid drugs
The use of opioids in the clinic is associated with concerns about tolerance, dependence and addiction, and
also other risks posed by the numerous unwanted effects
of these compounds.
108 SYSTEMS OF THE BODY
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
