Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_2817_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
02.09.2026
Размер:
19 Мб
Скачать
5
A Presynaptic inhibition B Postsynaptic inhibition
PAIN AND ANALGESIA
Projection neuron (lamina I)
Serotonergic axon inhibits release of neurotransmitter from nociceptor
Descending
noradrenergic or
Nociceptor (Aδ/C)
Axon to
anterolateral
tract
Fig. 5.5 Spinal cord mechanisms of descending inhibition. (A) Presynaptic inhibition; (B) Postsynaptic inhibition. See text for details.
by this stimulation activates the inhibitory interneurons even more powerfully than noradrenaline and so blocks pain transmission. However, 5- HT may not be specifi­cally involved in the inhibition of pain transmission, as serotonergic agonists do not have significant analgesic effects. 5- HT neurons appear to inhibit all somatosensory transmission and may have a function in the initiation of sleep. A complicating factor is that 5- HT receptors are found in many locations in the dorsal horn, including on C fibres, and different 5- HT receptor subtypes mediate different effects of 5- HT.
serotonergic input
from brainstem
Myelinated (Aβ)
non-nociceptor input
the adrenal gland, to inhibit the activity of specific immune cells by activating their β2 adrenergic or D1 receptors. Additionally, by activating the splenic lym­phocytes to induce release of acetylcholine, splenic mac­rophages can be inhibited. This raises the possibility that differential activation of selective neural circuits by elec­trical stimulation (by using a device akin to an electrical pacemaker) may provide a way to selectively inhibit local inflammatory responses without suppressing the entire immune system, thereby reducing adverse effects or infections.
Inhibitory
interneuron
Axon to anterolateral tract
Projection neuron
Nociceptor
(Aδ/C)
Acupuncture analgesia
Acupuncture is a Traditional Chinese Medicine tech­nique used to treat pain by inserting needles into specific points in the body (acupoints) and then either manually or electrically activating the deep tissue afferents to pro­duce analgesia. There are several mechanisms by which analgesia is thought to occur. Electrical stimulation of the needles appears to work in a manner similar to TENS, by locally activating gate control. Increasing the intensity recruits the supraspinal descending pathways to pro­duce analgesia via the release of endogenous opioid neu­rotransmitters. Some suggest that acupuncture is a form of distraction or diffuse noxious inhibitory control, whereby pain in another part of the body distracts the subject from the primary locus of pain. Electrical stimu­lation can also activate catecholamine nuclei within the brainstem to promote descending analgesia. Most
Recent work has clarified the mechanisms involved in the analgesia seen during intense excitement or arousal. During arousal the sympathetic nervous system is active in the body. Sympathetic fibres activate the slow pain pathways (STT and SRT) whose axons ascend to activate noradrenergic cells in the LC. Noradrenergic axons proj­ect back down to the spinal cord (via the dorsolateral funiculus) and synapse on the cells in laminae I– II, form­ing a feedback loop. Some lamina II cells contain the inhibitory transmitter GABA, and they in turn synapse on the cell bodies of large lamina I cells and on the distal dendrites of lamina V cells. Activation of the central nor­adrenaline system excites the inhibitory interneurons of lamina II and thus inhibits the lamina I STT cells, block­ing pain transmission. Therefore, agents that increase
noradrenergic transmission have analgesic potential. recently, a subgroup of sensory afferents innervating deep tissues have been discovered by researchers at Harvard University that have the ability to selectively inhibit inflammation. They act on the vagal nerve to pro­duce the release of noradrenaline and dopamine from
areas such as the hypothalamus or the amygdala, stimu-
lates the PAG to induce analgesia. This is involved in the
‘fight- or- flight’ reaction that produces hypoalgesia in life-
threatening situations, for example, on the battlefield.
Arousal analgesia
Additionally, activity from autonomic-related brain
99THE NERVOUS SYSTEM
5
Fear
(chronic pain)
deprivation
PAIN AND ANALGESIA
Sleep
Fig. 5.6 The vicious psychological circle of pain. Untreated pain that persists for any length of time can cause fear and anxiety. If the pain fails to resolve, patients become depressed and lose confidence in themselves and their doctors. Sleeplessness may exacerbate the problem. (Adapted from Wall PD, Melzack R. (1994) Textbook of pain. Churchill.)
Psychology of pain
Emotions are central to the experience and expression of pain. Signs of emotional distress are the most frequently recognized evidence that a patient is in pain. The most common emotional aspects associated with pain are anx­iety (that the pain will get worse), fear (that it may ulti­mately kill or severely impair them), and depression (that the pain may never go away or get better) that set up a vicious circle of pain that dominates the patient’s life both in acute and chronic pain states (Fig. 5.6). Other emotions may be present such as aggression, anger, guilt or in some individuals, sexual arousal. Emotional dis­tress is thus not only a component of pain but results from pain and can cause further pain; all these facets require the doctor’s attention. In part, this helps to explain why drugs such as antidepressants are effective at relieving pain.
No two people’s experience of pain is the same, and there are many psychological factors that affect pain. These are summarized in Table 5.6. There is evidence linking levels of pain perception with the opening or clos­ing of the pain gate in the spinal cord. The gate can be opened or closed depending upon the messages received from the brain. This provides a psycho- physiological basis for factors that modulate chronic pain. This is sum­marized in Table 5.7.
While relatively little is known about the mechanisms involved, the limbic system and in particular, the hypo­thalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis that is involved in the stress response, have been implicated. Dysfunction of this pathway has been implicated in some chronic pain conditions such as arthritis and fibromyalgia.
(acute pain)
Helplessness
(chronic pain)
Pain
Anxiety
(acute pain)
Depression
Table 5.6 Psychological factors influencing pain responses
Prior experience
Cognitive appraisal (meaning of pain)
Mental attitude e.g. fear, anxiety, stress
Cultural beliefs
Personality (neuroticism or extroversion)
Coping strategies (attention, distraction, biofeedback)
Medication
Sex differences
Table 5.7 Factors that regulate spinal gate control
Gate open Gate closed
Physiological C/Aδ fibres active Aβ fibres active
Medical Extent of injury
Insufficient medication
Cognitive Focus on pain Distraction
Emotional
state
Behavioural:
personality
Anxiety Fear Stress Depression
Introvert Extrovert
Sufficient medication
Reinterpretation of pain
Happy, optimistic Relaxed Rested Prior experience of pain
Identification of factors that help reduce pain per­ception allows psychological management strategies to be employed in conjunction with pharmacotherapy. These include cognitive- behavioural therapies that change the patient’s beliefs and perceptions of pain, educating the patient about their understanding of pain and addressing pain behaviour rather than the pain perception. One important psychological factor is the placebo effect or the expectation that the doctor will make the patient better (Box 5.3). Biofeedback (relaxation) techniques can be used to modify biologi­cal aspects of pain that produce changes in physiologi­cal parameters, for example, skin temperature and EMG activity have proven beneficial. Similarly, atten­tion and/or distraction strategies that construct a sep­arate image or reinterpret the pain can be very effective at reducing perceived pain levels.
Measuring pain
Several methods can be used to measure pain. The most common is a medical interview when patients are asked to use a rating scale. These scales range from verbal rat­ing scores to visual analogue scales and box scales (Fig.
5.7) and the McGill Pain Questionnaire that consists of 78
adjectives organized into 20 groups based on similarities
100 SYSTEMS OF THE BODY
Box
A Visual analogue scale
imaginable
imaginable
pain
Flare response (ANS fibres)
Site of damage (hypoalgesic/analgesic)
A in response to heat
A in response to touch stimuli
A in response to touch only
The placebo effect
5.3
Placebo is Latin for ‘I shall please’. Its main use is as a con­trol to test the efficacy of new drugs in clinical conditions. Placebos can be pills, injections or even surgical procedures, and the patient who receives one believes that they have been given the ‘good drug’ that will alleviate their symp­toms. In this regard, the placebo can be a powerful anal­gesic but there is great variability in patient responses. The biochemical basis and mechanism of action of placebos remain unclear. Several hypotheses have been suggested to account for its actions. Firstly, that it reduces pain percep­tion by reducing anxiety levels. Secondly, that expectancy can account for the observed changes. Lastly, that the pla­cebo effect is a case of Pavlovian conditioning, whereby association with the drug induces positive emotional responses. The placebo effect does have a physiologi­cal basis, as its analgesic effect can be antagonized by the opioid antagonist naloxone. Recent research suggests that the placebo effect can activate the dopaminergic reward system. Thus, the suggestion or belief that a treatment will work is enough to cause the release of endogenous opioids that may activate anti-nociceptive mechanisms and other neurotransmitters such as dopamine. The placebo response may also play a role in other alternative medical treatments such as hypnotherapy and acupuncture.
5
PAIN AND ANALGESIA
rea of primary hyperalgesia
rea of primary hyperalgesia
rea of secondary hyperalgesia
Fig. 5.8 Areas of analgesia flare, and primary and secondary hyperalgesia to different stimuli, after tissue injury. ANS, Autonomic nervous system.
response to pain such as grimacing, vocalization, limping etc. Lastly, there are physiological measures, such as changes in threshold for activation, autonomic activity changes (heart rate, skin temperature), or evoked poten­tials from reflex activity. Imaging techniques can also be used to measure changes in brain activity in patients in pain.
Pain mechanisms after tissue damage: peripheral and central sensitization
No pain
B Verbal rating scale
No pain
C Varni –Thompson paediatric scale
Severe
Fig. 5.7 Psychological evaluation of pain using rating scales. (A) Visual analogue scale where the patient marks a point along a line indicating their pain level. (B) Verbal rating scale where the patient rates the score on a scale of 0–10 where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable. (C) Paediatric pain scale using smiley or sad faces to indicate the level of pain.
in pain quality. It offers the patient the opportunity to describe their pain using emotional and sensory descrip­tors. A pain rating is based on the scale value of the words, and the patient’s personal interpretation of the pain is also considered. Non-verbal scales use behav­ioural assessments based on stereotypical behaviours in
0 12345678910
Worst pain
Worst pain
No pain
Normally, nociceptors require intense stimuli to activate them. However, pain sensation does not follow the firing pattern of nociceptors in a simple, predictable fashion. The central processing of this input in terms of summa­tion of afferent input and inhibitory interactions is very important.
Peripheral tissue injury produces two types of change
within the nervous system: peripheral sensitization, which is manifest as a reduction in the threshold for nociceptor activation, and central sensitization, an activity- dependent increase in the excitability of CNS neurons. Together they contribute to the post- injury hypersensitivity that is com­mon in chronic pain syndromes.
Peripheral injury induces a decreased pain threshold at the site of injury, coupled with a variable loss of sen­sory input directly at the site of injury and in the sur­rounding tissue. The former is the area of primary hyperalgesia and is responsive to both thermal and mechanical stimuli, and is mediated by C fibres, while the latter is the area of secondary hyperalgesia that is only responsive to mechanical stimuli and is mediated by Aβ fibres. In addition, a flare response (reddening of the skin) due to activation of the sympathetic axons occurs, causing release of neuroactive substances that may potentiate the sensitization process (Fig. 5.8).
Much has been learned about the molecular mecha­nisms of peripheral sensitization after focal nerve or inflammatory injury. This is summarized in Fig. 5.9.
101THE NERVOUS SYSTEM
5
Mast cells, neutrophils
Peripheral
To brain
SP release
DRG
Release
of glutamate
and peptides
injury
PAIN AND ANALGESIA
Skin
Fig. 5.9 Mechanisms of peripheral sensitization. Peripheral injury results in the creation of an acidic inflammatory ‘soup’ containing peptides, histamine, bradykinin, protons, adenosine, cytokines, serotonin and prostaglandins. These excite the appropriate receptors on the nociceptors causing activation of protein kinase A and C, leading to phosphorylation of various ion channels and receptors. This results in a lowering of the activation threshold and the excitability of the membrane increases. A secondary consequence of nociceptor activation is the induction of neurogenic inflammation, caused by the release of neuropeptides causing vasodilation and plasma extravasation of proteins from the blood stream, and activation of non-neuronal cells which in turn contribute substances to the inflammatory ‘soup’. CGRP, Calcitonin gene-related peptide; DRG, dorsal root ganglion; S P, substance P.
Tissue damage leads to the production of an inflamma­tory ‘chemical soup’ that activates the various receptors on nociceptors (see Table 5.4). This leads to alterations in signal transduction sensitivity and also a change in the distribution of receptors, with down- regulation of some and upregulation of others. Primary hyperalgesia is mediated by a lowering of the activation threshold of sensitized Aδ and C fibres. It is thought that the major function of NSAIDs is to prevent peripheral sensitization by inhibiting prostaglandin production, an effect achieved by blocking the action of the enzyme cyclo­oxygenase (COX).
Peripheral sensitization induces a nociceptive afferent barrage that triggers excitability changes in spinal cord neurons, a response that outlasts the stimulus input. These changes are manifest as changes in RF size, low­ered threshold for activation and increased responsive­ness, as a direct result of the recruitment of previously subthreshold inputs. Central sensitization is responsible for the secondary hyperalgesia seen after injury. The input from Aβ fibres produces pain by changes in the sensory processing by spinal cord neurons and not by changes in the threshold for activation.
The molecular mechanisms of central sensitization are well understood. Noxious stimuli cause the release of the fast excitatory transmitter glutamate that acts at ionotropic (α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA), N-methyl-D aspartate (NMDA)) and metabo­tropic glutamate receptors. Neuropeptides such as sub­stance P are co- released, which produce a slow, progressive, excitatory potential that gives the afferent the opportunity
Inflammatory
mediators
Peripheral sensitization
Plasma
extravasation and
vasodilation leading to
neurogenic inflammation
Nociceptor
activation
Neuropeptide release (SP/CGRP)
Blood vessel
• Altered gene
expression
Activity
to produce progressively increased response in neurons when repeatedly activated, due to summation of these slow potentials. They activate second messenger cascades to pro­duce increased intra- cellular calcium levels that depolarize the cell, resulting in phosphorylation of ion channels and receptors, alteration of gene expression, and upregulation of molecules such as prostaglandins and COX enzymes (Fig. 5.10). Not surprisingly, central sensitization can be pre- vented by drugs that target the NMDA receptor such as ketamine, COX2 selective inhibitors such as rofecoxib, or neuropeptide receptor antagonists such as NK1 antagonists.
Neuropathic pain mechanisms
Chronic pain is a common symptom of neurological dis­ease, and current pharmacotherapy strategies remain far from satisfactory. This is partly due to the fact that the pathophysiological mechanisms of pain remain incom­pletely understood. Neuropathic pain can be caused by a variety of insults (Table 5.8) and classified by site of ori- gin (Table 5.9) or response to drug treatments. Recently, clinicians and scientists have begun to address the mech­anisms involved in different types of pain. An example of this is the neuropathic pain that occurs in peripheral neuropathy induced by partial nerve damage. This causes a cascade of changes at different sites along the damaged nerve and at the first synapse in the spinal cord that lead to the generation of spontaneous (stimulus­independent) pain or evoked (stimulus- dependent) pain (Fig. 5.11).
102 SYSTEMS OF THE BODY
TTX
Dorsal horn
Gly receptor
5
PAIN AND ANALGESIA
neuron
EP
EP
AMPA
NK
NMDA
mGluR
1
Table 5.9 Classification of some common forms of neuropathic
Peripheral Spinal Brain
Neuropathy Spinal stroke Stroke
Amputation Spinal cord injury Multiple sclerosis
Nerve injury Multiple sclerosis Cancer
Avulsion Cancer
Radiculopathy Syringomyelia
Trigeminal neuralgia Arachnoiditis
Cancer Syphilis
Herpes zoster
Primary afferent
nociceptor
SP
Fig. 5.10 Molecular mechanisms of central sensitization. Prolonged activation of nociceptors results in stimulation of postsynaptic neurons by glutamate and neuropeptide release, leading to activation of multiple signalling pathways that result in the phosphorylation of AMPA and NMDA receptors, leading to central sensitization by lowering the threshold for activation so that subthreshold inputs become suprathreshold and produce action potentials. Cells can regulate their own activity and that of the primary afferent by release of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) and nitric oxide (NO). AMPA and NMDA (α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid and N-methyl-D-aspartate), Ionotropic glutamate receptors; COX-2, inducible isoform 2 of cyclo­oxygenase; E P, prostaglandin receptor; ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinases; Gly, glycine receptor; IP3, inositol triphosphate; mGluR, metabotropic glutamate receptors; NK1, neurokinin receptors; NOS, nitric oxide synthase; PKA, protein kinase A; PKC, protein kinase C; TTX, tetrodotoxin-sensitive and tetrodotoxin-insensitive sodium channels.
Table 5.8 Causes of neuropathic pain
Cause Example
Mechanical trauma Neuropathy, avulsion
Compression Disk herniation, carpal tunnel syndrome
Inflammation Arthritis
Infection Herpes zoster, syphilis
Toxicity Cisplatin, taxol, vincristine
Disease Cancer
Ischaemia Thalamic syndrome, angina
Metabolic Diabetes
Immune HIV, multiple sclerosis
Autonomic Complex regional pain syndrome
Glu
PGE
2
ERK
PKC
PKA +IP
3
NO
pain by site
COX-2
NOS
Ca
2+
Nucleus
Gene
transcription
between injured and uninjured nerve fibres,
Several important nervous system mechanisms have
been identified.
Peripheral mechanisms include:
1. Ectopic impulse generation (spontaneous activity) occurs at the site of injury (neuroma) or the spinal ganglion or dorsal roots of injured afferents. Abnormal sodium channel expression or redistribution is thought to be responsible for these changes. The pain quality is described as lancinating or shock- like burning pain.
2. Ephaptic connections (involving interactions generated by electrical fields created by neurons)
leading to ectopic discharges in injured fibres evoking spontaneous activity in uninjured ones (i.e. amplifying the central signal).
3. Abnormal chemical sensitivity develops in primary afferents (phenotypic switching) so that they become sensitive to substances they were not responding to prior to injury, such as catecholamines.
Central mechanisms include:
1. Central sensitization of spinal cord cells due to the injury barrage, ongoing spontaneous activity in uninjured and injured axons, or release of neuroactive substances from glial cells.
103THE NERVOUS SYSTEM
5
Uninjured axon
Injured axon
Peripheral nerve Spinal cord dorsal horn
PAIN AND ANALGESIA
Wallerian
degeneration
Fig. 5.11 Changes associated with primary afferents after peripheral nerve injury. Axotomy produces a range of effects at distinct sites along the nerve and in the spinal cord that may contribute to pathological pain (see text for further details). DRG, Dorsal root ganglion.
2. Disinhibition of spinal cord cells due to afferent cell death, atrophy or decreased supraspinal inhibition, or loss of inhibitory neurotransmitters such as GABA.
3. CNS plasticity in the form of degenerative and regenerative events that result in structural rearrangements of neuronal connections, leading to permanent aberrant connections.
4. Changes at one level of the nervous system leading to subsequent pathophysiological changes at more rostral levels of the neuraxis, for example, thalamus and cortex that can lead to altered sensory perceptions such as phantom limb pain (Box 5.4).
Sympathetic axon sprouting
Injured DRG
• Cell death
Altered phenotype
• Spontaneous activity
Injury site
• Injury discharge
• Inflammatory reaction
• Long term ectopic discharge
• Neuroma formation
Ephaptic connections
Uninjured DRG
Altered phenotype
• Spontaneous activity
as ‘activated’). Once activated, glia produce and release pro-inflammatory cytokines, pro- nociceptive growth fac­tors and prostaglandins that activate pain signalling cas­cades, disrupt inhibitory circuits and cause neurotoxicity. This also offers another potential avenue for pain control. For example, the drug minocycline, which selectively inhibits activated microglia, is in clinical trials for pain associated with spinal cord injury. Additionally, the expression of specific receptors that can act as biomarkers for these two main glial phenotypes has been identified. Metabolic reprogramming of neurotoxic glial phenotypes by targeting glucose metabolism to modulate their phe­notype back toward their normal homeostatic functions may become a future treatment option.
Primary
afferent
sprouting
Mechanical/thermal
hypersensitivity
Central
sensitization
Cell death
Terminal
atrophy
Postsynaptic neurons
Altered phenotype
• Changes in synaptic connectivity
Disinhibition
Spontaneous
activity
104 SYSTEMS OF THE BODY
Glial cells and neuropathic pain
Traditionally, the primary role of glial cells is described in terms of neuronal support, especially for their energy demand, as the bioenergetic coupling between neurons and glia (e.g. lactate shuttling and ATP production) is cru­cial for normal function. However, the past decade has revealed their roles in the development and maintenance of neuropathic pain. Glial cells possess many of the same characteristics as neurons, such as expressing the same receptors and synthesizing and releasing neurotransmit­ters. Nerve injury and inflammation induce glial cell acti­vation, and recent evidence points to a role for activated glial cells in chronic pain associated with bone cancer and infectious diseases. These conditions change the glia phe­notype from having a homeostatic role (described as ‘rest­ing’) to being a pro- inflammatory phenotype (described
Pharmacology of pain
Pain is a very common symptom that accompanies a variety of pathological states. Therefore analgesia, that is, the relief of pain, is an essential component of many inte­grated therapeutic strategies. Pain can be acute or chronic, as described in detail above, and its temporal evolution and severity may be unpredictable and pose a real challenge to the clinician. This is exemplified by the case history (see Box 5.1). Unfortunately, at present pain is still managed inadequately in spite of the availability of a wide range of treatments. This inadequacy is due in some instances to the complex nature of pain itself. In other cases, poor pain management is due to misplaced fears as to the adverse effects of analgesics.
The previous review of the pain pathways and of the local circuits involved in nociception and pain shows that multiple neurotransmitter systems, at various levels
Box
Phantom limb pain
5.4
5
PAIN AND ANALGESIA
Phantom limb pain occurs in many amputees that suffer a traumatic accident (see Box 5.1). It also occurs in avulsion (i.e. extrusion of nerve roots) injury patients. The sensations occur when an area of the body which is not damaged is touched and elicits pain sensations that feel as though they originate in the amputated region. For example, stroking the face can elicit phantom pain in arm amputees or stimulating the geni­talia can elicit phantom pain in lower limb amputees.
For the brain to perceive a phantom it must recognize that a body part is no longer present. This raises the intrigu­ing question of whether the brain has an innate map of the body or if body image is generated from peripheral sensory input. One theory suggests that the brain contains an innate body image—a neural network that is genetically determined but modulated by the environment. If this ‘neuromatrix’ is deprived of modulating input, it produces an abnormal sig­nature pattern that can result in phantom sensations. This theory can account for phantom sensations in congenital amputees and children, although in these cases the phantoms are rarely painful.
The mechanisms behind phantom limb pain remain incom­pletely understood but involve plasticity at several levels of the nervous system. This is the remapping hypothesis. Damage to the peripheral nerves causes a deafferentation syndrome (i.e. loss of input). The spontaneous pain is thought to arise from either the nerve neuroma (a disorganised tangle of nerve fibres at the site of nerve damage) or from loss of input to CNS cells causing spontaneous firing in the absence of input. The deafferentation also causes a change in the balance between excitatory and inhibitory inputs to cells. A loss of inhibi­tion leads to an ‘unmasking’ of preexisting silent synapses of adjacent uninjured nerves that under normal conditions only provide a subthreshold input to cells but are not manifest as part of the normal receptive field. Following injury, these sub­threshold inputs become suprathreshold and now evoke action potentials in neurons in response to stimulation of the periph­ery. The receptive field of such cells in the deafferented spinal cord thus appears to change in response to injury. This remap­ping procedure occurs at subsequent levels of the brainstem, thalamus and cortex and can be explained in terms of overlap of adjacent afferents from different parts of the body.
The somatosensory and motor cortices contain distorted body maps—the homunculus—for (see Figs. 4.6 and 9.11) sen­sory input and motor output, respectively. Due to disinhibition of cells caused by the injury, the area of cortex adjacent to the deafferented cortex gradually ‘invades’ the silent region and
cells become responsive to the new input. In arm amputees, the face somatosensory cortex is adjacent to the arm cortex in the map, and this area now activates the previously arm responsive area of cortex. Thus a stimulus to the face now produces sen­sations that are perceived as originating from the face and also from the amputated arm (Fig. 5.12). Increased activity from cells in the deafferented motor cortex may be responsible for the cramping- like pain that many patients experience. This is thought to arise because these cells fire impulses to the ampu­tated region but receive no feedback. The strength of the sig­nal increases in order to try to get a response, making the pain worse. Interestingly, clinical studies using electrical motor cortex stimulation or a mirror box to create the illusion of the miss­ing limb, or the use of a prosthetic limb have all been found to reduce the levels of phantom pain in patients.
To conclude, human pain conditions often involve a collec­tion of different mechanisms, often activated concomitantly. Therefore it is unlikely that only one drug can provide relief in complex cases.
F
F
UA
Fig. 5.12 Schematic representation of results from positron emission tomography (PET) studies showing expansion (arrows) of facial somatosensory cortex and upper arm cortical regions into the deafferented hand and forearm cortical regions (dotted circle) following upper limb amputation. On the contralateral side, each limb region has its own distinct cortical representation. H, Hand; F, face regions of the somatosensory homunculus; UA, upper arm.
H
UA
of the neuraxis, may constitute therapeutic targets in pain management.
Analgesic drugs may affect different aspects of noci-
ception. They may:
 • actatthesiteofinjuryanddecreasethepainasso-
ciated with inflammatory reactions (e.g. NSAIDs)
 • alternerveconduction(i.e.localanaesthetics)
 • modifytransmissionofnociceptiveinformationin
the dorsal horn of the spinal cord (e.g. opioids and antidepressant drugs)
 • activatedescendinginhibitorycontrols(e.g.
opioids)
105THE NERVOUS SYSTEM
5
A general strategy used to control pain is described in the World Health Organization Analgesic Ladder, which was initially introduced in 1986 for patients with cancer pain (Box 5.5). The original ladder has three levels or ‘rungs’. On the first rung (i.e. at the first level), aspirin, paracetamol, or other NSAIDs are given to relieve pain. Next, weak opioid drugs can be introduced (such as codeine, tramadol or dextropropoxyphene). Finally, the third rung is represented by strong opioids such as mor­phine, hydromorphone, fentanyl, buprenorphine and
PAIN AND ANALGESIA
methadone. Other non-opioid drugs can be used in com­bination with opioids in order to potentiate the pain-
Box
Cancer pain
5.5
In the UK the likelihood of developing cancer is now more than one in three, and one in four will die from the disease. Cancer mainly affects the elderly, with 65% of cases occurring in those aged over 65 years.
The symptom that is feared by most cancer patients is severe pain; pain is the first symptom in 25%–50% of patients, and two- thirds of cancer patients require pain treat­ment during the course of their disease, with the incidence rising in terminal cancer patients. Clinically used anti-neoplas­tic drugs such as taxol, vincristine and cisplatin, are limited in their use because they cause painful paraesthesias due to toxic damage to the peripheral nerve fibres.
Bone cancer pain is the most common cause of cancer­related pain and represents a major clinical problem. Pain associated with primary cancers originating in the lung, breast, ovary or prostate is linked to the metastasis to bone. Cancer patients report wide fluctuations in pain intensity, varying from ongoing pain that is characterized as constant, deep and aching in character, to intermittent episodes of extreme intense pain that occurs spontaneously or more com­monly with movement or weight bearing on a limb.
Treatment for cancer pain has been hampered by the lack of knowledge of the basic neurobiology of mechanisms underlying this type of pain and the lack of suitable models. Treatment has been classically based on the ‘WHO analgesic ladder’, starting with NSAIDs, followed by weak opioids such as codeine and then strong opioid drugs such as morphine (see Table 5.10). However, the efficacy of such drugs is rather limited and they have many unwanted effects. Although cancer pain is treated with opioids to provide round- the­clock analgesia, patients often suffer from ‘breakthrough’ pain while taking the analgesic medication. Some opioid drug formulations, e.g. ACTIQ® (oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate), have been approved specifically for breakthrough pain. ACTIQ dissolves through the mucous membranes in the mouth and provides rapid pain relief within 5–10 min. Patients find the drug easy to use and effective and they tol­erate it well.
Breakthroughs in the understanding of cancer pain mecha­nisms have arisen with the advent of animal models of bone
relieving effects. This 3- step gradual approach was based on the use of the two main categories of analgesic drugs: non-opioid and opioid drugs. Pain specialists have pro­posed an update to this, to include a fourth rung (Table
5.10) because of the need for integrating non-pharmaco-
logical treatments. The updated ladder focuses on the quality of life and is bidirectional, extending its useful­ness to treat acute pain in that the strongest analgesic required can be scaled up or down, according to the intensity described by the patient. However, for chronic pain, the ascending step- wise approach from bottom to top continues.
cancer pain that closely model the human condition. In these models, pain severity is directly related to bone degeneration. Pain is thought to be due to tumour cells releasing cytokines and growth factors that activate T cells and osteoclasts. Osteoclast activity can be controlled by a molecule called osteoprotegerin ligand (OPGL), also known as receptor acti­vator of nuclear factor kappa- B ligand (RANKL), whose recep­tor is found on osteoclasts. Bone resorption can be blocked by a naturally secreted decoy receptor called osteoprotegerin (OPG), which binds to OPGL and prevents the activation of osteoclasts. Treatment with OPG prevents bone destruction and the secondary associated spinal cord changes and, most importantly, it significantly reduces the breakthrough pain. Bisphosphonates (e.g. zoledronic acid) are another exam­ple of drug class that could be used: they induce osteoclast apoptosis. Finally, another approach involves the use of den­osumab—a monoclonal antibody that inhibits RANKL and leads to loss of osteoclasts. All these approaches lead to some relief of pain. Bone degeneration is also associated with the release of inflammatory mediators and lowered extracellular pH that lead to the activation and sensitization of bone peri­osteum primary afferents. This is coupled with neurochemi­cal changes in the spinal cord, particularly increased glial cell activation. Glial cells are known to regulate excitatory amino acid levels and activated cells are also a source of cytokines and growth factors that will alter the surrounding neuronal microenvironment. Ultimately, all these changes lead to the induction of central sensitization, which contributes to pain maintenance.
Table 5.10 Proposed change to the WHO Analgesic Ladder
1. Non-opioid analgesics; if pain persists or increases
2. Weak opioids and non-opioids; if pain persists or increases
3. Strong opioids and non-opioids; if pain persists or increases
4. Invasive and minimally invasive treatments e.g. epidural anaesthesia, PCA pumps, neuromodulation techniques e.g. spinal cord or deep brain stimulation, ablative surgery
PCA, Patient-controlled analgesia.
106 SYSTEMS OF THE BODY
5
Opioid receptors and ligands
The terms ‘opioid’ and ‘opiate’ are often used inter­changeably, although they have a different meaning. ‘Opiate’ means that a substance is extracted from opium or is similar in structure to natural substances present in opium. Opium is the dried exudate obtained from unripe seedpods of the poppy Papaver somniferum and contains morphine, codeine and other alkaloid substances. ‘Opioid’ is a term that designates substances that are not derived from opium. It refers particularly to opioid pep­tides, that is, endogenous compounds that bind to opioid receptors and mimic the effect of morphine- like com­pounds. This term is now used to designate all agents that act on opioid receptors. Morphine, the prototype opioid drug, has been used for many centuries (Box 5.6).
Opioids and opiates bind to opioid receptors, which are G- protein coupled receptors. Three main receptor types have been identified: mu (μ) receptors, divided into the splice variants μ1, μ2 and μ3; delta (δ) receptors, divided into δ1 and δ2; and kappa (κ) receptors, divided into κ1, κ2 and κ3 (although for the κ type the receptor subtypes may arise from interaction of a single protein with different membrane associated proteins).
Opioid substances that act as agonists at opioid recep­tors often have limited selectivity for a given receptor type. Administered systemically, opioid agonists induce a host of effects, which include analgesia. This complex
effect profile is a direct consequence of the widespread distribution of opioid receptors in the brain and spinal cord, and also at the periphery. The activation of each main type of opioid receptor can be associated with cer­tain predominant effects, as illustrated in Table 5.11. Although opioid agonists, in particular at mu receptors, can induce significant analgesia, their use is always associ­ated with unwanted effects, some of which may become life threatening, such as respiratory depression. The most prescribed opioid drugs (e.g. morphine, fentanyl, codeine), discussed below, preferentially target the mu opioid receptors. Substances targeting these receptors are responsible for the induction of analgesia and of almost all prototypic opioid unwanted effects such as euphoria, mental clouding, sedation, respiratory depression and cough suppression, pupillary miosis, urinary retention, nausea and vomiting, bradycardia and vasodilation, con­stipation and histamine release. Opioid agonists reduce neuronal excitability by increasing potassium conductance and can also inhibit neurotransmitter release by decreas­ing calcium influx that is required for exocytosis.
A range of opioid agonists, partial agonists and also opiate antagonists is available in the clinic. These drugs have unique pharmacokinetic and pharmacody­namic characteristics, as discussed below. The choice of opioid drug used in a patient ideally should take into account all these characteristics but in reality is also influenced by the individual patient response to a particular drug.
PAIN AND ANALGESIA
Box
Opium—a trail that goes back to the beginning of medical history
5.6
Opium has been known to mankind for millennia. Egyptian papyri mention its medical uses and the Sumerians describe the poppy as ‘the plant of joy’. Preparations based on opium extracts have been used to treat cough and diar­rhoea. In parallel to this, many cultures have become aware of the addictive properties of opium.
The effects of morphine prompted a search for specific receptors, which culminated with the discovery of opiate receptors in 1973. This discovery was followed in 1975 by the identification of the first endogenous opioid peptides, the enkephalins. All the endogenous opioid substances discov­ered so far are peptides. Opioid peptides are produced fol­lowing the general pattern of synthesis of neuropeptides. They are synthesized as part of large protein precursors that undergo extensive posttranslational maturation and, after proteolytic cleavage, release the bioactive peptides.
The three main types of peptides, i.e. the enkephalins, dynorphins and β- endorphin, derive from three different precursors.
 • Proopiomelanocortinistheproteinprecursorof
endorphin. Cells expressing this gene are concentrated in the arcuate nucleus of the hypothalamus and β­endorphin projections innervate extensively other
hypothalamic nuclei, limbic structures and the raphe nuclei.
 • Proenkephalinistheprecursorofenkephalins.This
precursor is expressed predominantly in interneurons.
 • Prodynorphinistheprecursorofdynorphinsand
neoendorphins. Cells expressing the precursor are present in several brain areas, particularly areas involved in nociception, and also in the spinal cord.
Nociceptin/orphanin FQ and nocistatin are opioid- related peptides that are synthesized as part of the orphanin FQ/ nociceptin protein precursor. As their name suggests, their effects on nociception appear to be mutually antagonistic. Nociceptin binds to the ORL1 receptor, which shows overall 60% homology with the three main opioid receptor types. Nociceptin can induce strong nociception, whereas nocistatin blocks these effects and has analgesic properties.
Endomorphin- 1 and endomorphin- 2 are two more addi­tions to the large opioid peptide family. These short peptides have very high affinity and selectivity for mu opioid recep­tors. Endomorphin- 1 appears to be more widely distributed within the brain than endomorphin- 2, whereas the latter is more prevalent in the spinal cord.
107THE NERVOUS SYSTEM
5
Table 5.11 Effects associated with the stimulation of opioid
receptor subtypes
Effects
Analgesia
Supraspinal +++ +/−
Spinal ++ ++ +
PAIN AND ANALGESIA
Respiratory depression +++ ++ +
Pupillary constriction ++
Reduced gastrointestinal
motility
Sedation ++ ++
Euphoria ++
Dysphoria +++
Dependence +++ +/−
+++, Strong effect; +, weak effect; , no effect.
Opioid analgesic drugs
Morphine is still the gold standard against which other opioid analgesics are compared. It can be administered via oral, intravenous, intramuscular, or subcutaneous routes. Slow- release preparations are also available. The drug undergoes significant first pass metabolism, so only a small fraction reaches systemic circulation after oral administration. One of the metabolites, morphine- 6­glucuronide, is biologically active and induces significant analgesia. The administration of morphine leads to pain alleviation but also to respiratory depression, nausea and vomiting, constipation, sedation, pupillary constriction (‘pin- point’ pupil) and histamine release. The metabolite morphine 6- glucuronide can accumulate in patients whose renal function is impaired, which increases the risk of respiratory depression.
Heroin (diamorphine) is a prodrug, which is metabo­lized to morphine (which is ultimately responsible for its effects). Heroin is more lipid soluble than morphine, therefore the effect after intramuscular administration has a more rapid onset. Its properties make it particu­larly suitable for epidural administration to relieve post­operative pain after major surgery. Its higher solubility also constitutes an advantage for subcutaneous infusion.
Codeine is an analgesic with lower efficacy than mor­phine (20% of the potency of morphine). Its analgesic effect is due to demethylation in the liver to morphine. It may be used in combination with aspirin or paracetamol, and it also has a significant anti-tussive (suppression of cough) effect. Like morphine, it induces constipation.
Pethidine is a synthetic substance that is more seda­tive and has a more rapid onset and a shorter duration of action than morphine. Its metabolite, norpethidine, is active and may accumulate to toxic levels in patients
Mu receptors
++ ++ +
Delta receptors
Kappa receptors
with renal impairment. Its potency is 1/10th of that of morphine.
Methadone is a synthetic compound with a half- life of 24–30 h. It has significantly higher bioavailability than morphine after oral administration (80% vs 25%–30% for morphine) and lacks active metabolites. Methadone has activity at the mu opioid receptor; it also inhibits 5- HT reuptake and is an antagonist at NMDA glutamate recep­tors. It leads to a much milder physical abstinence syn­drome than morphine but can induce psychological dependence. Methadone is routinely used in maintenance programs for morphine and heroin addicts.
Fentanyl is a highly potent compound with a half- life of 1–2 h. Fentanyl and related compounds (alfentanil, remifentanil) can be given before or during induction of general anaesthesia. The initial dose can be followed by a prolonged infusion during the surgical procedure. Fentanyl formulations are also used to treat break­through cancer pain (see Box 5.5).
Buprenorphine is a very lipid soluble compound, which acts as a partial agonist at mu receptors. It is a potent compound (50 times more potent than morphine) but has less efficacy than morphine. Consequently, it may lead to a re- emergence of pain in patients who have received opioids with higher efficacy such as morphine. It can be used sublingually, and it has a longer duration of action than morphine but is more emetic. It may induce dysphoria and sedation.
Tramadol is an atypical opioid that possesses anti­nociceptive and anti-hyperalgesic properties. It is an attractive alternative to traditional opioid analgesics because of its improved side effect profile, reduced abuse potential and lack of tolerance and dependence. Tramadol is effective in a broad range of moderate- to­severe types of pain. It acts weakly at mu receptors itself but its metabolite desmetramadol has high affinity for the receptors; tramadol also interacts with monoaminer­gic systems by blocking 5- HT and noradrenaline reup­take (but less effectively than tricyclic antidepressants).
Opioid antagonists
The opioid antagonist naloxone is used to reverse the effects of opioid agonists. Naloxone is used in the man­agement of opioid overdose or to relieve respiratory depression in apnoeic infants after opioid administration (e.g. pethidine) to the mother during labour. The half- life of naloxone is short (<1 h), therefore repeated injections may be required before reversal of the effect of an agonist (which may have a much longer half- life than naloxone) is achieved.
Important clinical issues in the use of opioid drugs
The use of opioids in the clinic is associated with con­cerns about tolerance, dependence and addiction, and also other risks posed by the numerous unwanted effects of these compounds.
108 SYSTEMS OF THE BODY