Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5891_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана
.pdf
Biocompatibility testing and marketing authorisation of degradable magnesium implants 351
dyes: one passes through the intact cell membrane, whereas the other does not) or
viable cell counting. However, there are little data available on the genotoxicity and
hemocompatibility of magnesium (Di Virgilio, Reigosa, and de Mele, 2011; Gu,
Zhen, Cheng, Zhong, and Xi, 2009). Besides the in vitro data, animal experiments
have been performed that focus on in vivo degradation and the local effects after implantation. Witte et al. (2007) also tested sensitisation using the MagnussoneKligman
test (GMPT) according to 10993-10 for comparison of the various magnesium alloys.
One publication focuses on the fate of hydroxide gas developed during the degradation
of magnesium (Bartsch, Willbold, Yarmolenko, and Witte, 2012).
Some scientists try to explain the effects of magnesium and alloying components on
the cellular level to reveal the mechanisms, unknown dangers, and potential markers for
the biocompatibility of magnesium implants (Feyerabend et al., 2010; Purnama,
Mantovani, and Couet, 2013). In recent years, it has become increasingly apparent
that in vitro corrosion of magnesium alloys is highly variable depending on the solution
used in the test set-up. Ions such as chloride, biological buffers, proteins, and amino
acids and temperature can influence in vitro degradation (reviewed in Xin et al.
(2011)). In a new approach using artificial neural networks, the influence of the CO
content is highlighted (Willumeit, Feyerabend, and Huber, 2013). Dynamic conditions
involving sheer stress, continuous mass transport, and the exchange of fluids also have
an impact on degradation (Levesque, Hermawan, Dube, and Mantovani, 2008).
To compare the results of the in vitro data in the future, it would be worthwhile to
develop a standardised procedure for measuring in vitro degradation with a defined
corrosion (or extraction) medium, temperature, and specific atmospheric conditions
(CO
2,O2,N2
) in addition to reference materials. In would also be helpful to establish
adefinition of the different phases of degradation to facilitate compatibility of the re-
sults of the toxicity tests of degradation intermediates. However, despite the many
efforts to find a predictable model for an in vitro/in vivo correlation, it seems that
we will continue to depend on animal experiments for infor mation about the time
course and intermediates of degradation.
2
References
Adams, C. P., & Brandnter, V. V. (2006). Estimating the cost of new drug development: is it
really 802 million dollars? Health Affairs (Millwood), 2, 420e428.
ANSI/AAMI HE 74. Human factors design process for medical devices.
ASTM F3036-13. Standard guide for testing absorbable stents biological evaluation.
ASTM F2502-11. Standard specification and test methods for absorbable plates and screws for
internal fixation implants.
Bartsch, I., Willbold, E., Yarmolenko, S., & Witte, F. (2012). In vivo fluorescence imaging of
apoptosis during foreign body response. Biomaterials, 33, 6926e6932.
Blind, K. (2004). The economics of standards. Theory, evidence, policy. Cheltenham: Edward
Elgar.
Bobe, K., Willbold, E., Morgenthal, I., Andersen, O., Studnitzky, T., Nellesen, J., et al. (2013).
In vitro and in vivo evaluation of biodegradable, open-porous scaffolds made of sintered
magnesium W4 short fibres. Acta Biomaterialia, 10, 8611e8623.

352 Surface Modification of Magnesium and its Alloys for Biomedical Applications
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
Di Virgilio, A. L., Reigosa, M., & de Mele, M. F. L. (2011). Biocompatibility of magnesium
particles evaluated by in vitro cytotoxicity and genotoxicity assays. Journal of Biomedical
Materials Research Part B, 99B, 111e119.
DiMasi, J. A., Hansen, R. W., & Grabowski, H. G. (2003). The price of innovation: new esti-
mates of drug development costs. Journal of Health Economics, 2, 151e185.
Feyerabend, F., Dr€ucker, H., Laipple, D., Vogt, C., Stekker, M., Hort, N., et al. (2012). Ion
release from magnesium materials in physiological solutions under different oxygen
tensions. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, 23,9e24.
Feyerabend, F., Fischer, J., Holtz, J., Witte, F., Willumeit, R., Dr€ucker, H., et al. (2010).
Evaluation of short-term effects of rare earth and other elements used in magnesium alloys
on primary cells and cell lines. Acta Biomaterialia, 6, 1834e1842.
Fischer, J., Prosenc, M. H., Wolff, M., Hort, N., Willumeit, R., & Feyerabend, F. (2010).
Interference of magnesium corrosion with tetrazolium-based cytotoxicity assays. Acta
Biomaterialia, 6, 1813e1823.
GHTF/SG1/N044:2008. (2008). Role of standards in the assessment of medical devices. Global
Harmonization Task Force. Study Group 1.
Gu, X., Zheng, Y., Cheng, Y., Zhong, S., & Xi, T. (2009). In vitro corrosion and biocompati-
bility of binary magnesium alloys. Biomaterials, 30, 484e498.
Hoffheinz, S., & Dimitroff, N. (1928). Experimentelle Studie€uber die resorption parental
zugef€uhrten metallischen Magnesiums. Deutsche Zeitschrift fuer Chirurgie, 208, 346e353.
IEC 62366. Medical devices e Application of usability engineering to medical devices.
ISO 10993. Biological evaluation of medical devices.
ISO 11135. Sterilization of health care products e Ethylene oxide.
ISO 13022. Medical products containing viable human cells e Application of risk management
and requirements for processing practices.
ISO 14630. Non-active surgical implants e General requirements.
ISO 14971. Medical devices e Application of risk management to medical devices.
ISO 22442 series. Medical devices utilizing animal tissues and their derivatives.
ISO 25539-2. Cardiovascular implants e Endovascular devices e Part 2: Vascular stents.
ISO Central Secretariat. (2007). Joining in e Participating in international standardization,
ISBN 978-92-67-10453-9. http://www.din.de/sixcms_upload/media/2896/joining_in_
2007.pdf.
ISO/CD 18362. Processing of cell-based health care products.
ISO/IEC 17025. General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories.
ISO/IEC Guide 2. Standardization and related activities e General vocabulary.
ISO/TR 37137. Biological evaluation of medical devices e Guidance for absorbable implants.
ISO/TS 17137. Cardiovascular implants and extracorporal systems e Cardiovascular absorbable
implants.
Kaplan, A. V., Baim, D. S., Smith, J. J., Feigal, D. A., Simons, M., Jefferys, D., et al. (2004).
Medical device developmentefrom prototype to regulatory approval. Circulation, 109,
3068e3072.
Levesque, J., Hermawan, H., Dube, D., & Mantovani, D. (2008). Design of a pseudo-
physiological test bench specific to the development of biodegradable metallic biomaterials. Acta Biomaterialia, 4, 284e295.
Purnama, A., Mantovani, D., & Couet, J. (2013). Caveolin: a possible biomarker of degradable
metallic materials toxicity in vascular cells. Acta Biomaterialia, 10, 8754e8760.
Vert, M., Doi, Y., Hellwich, K.-H., Hess, M., Hodge, P., Kubisa, P., et al. (2012). Terminology
for biorelated polymers and applications (IUPAC Recommendations 2012). Pure and
Applied Chemistry, 84(2), 377e410.

Biocompatibility testing and marketing authorisation of degradable magnesium implants 353
Williams, D. F. (1987). Definitions in biomaterials. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Williams, D. F. (2008). On the mechanisms of biocompatibility. Biomaterials, 29, 2941e2953.
Willumeit, R., Feyerabend, F., & Huber, N. (2013). Magnesium degradation as determined by
artificial neural networks. Acta Biomaterialia, 10, 8722e8729.
Willumeit, R., Fischer, J., Feyerabend, F., Hort, N., Bismayer, U., Heidrich, S., et al. (2011).
Chemical surface alteration of biodegradable magnesium exposed to corrosion media. Acta
Biomaterialia, 7, 2704e2715.
Witte, F. (2010). The history of biodegradable magnesium implants: a review. Acta
Biomaterialia, 6, 1680e1692.
Witte, F., Abeln, I., Switzer, E., Kaese, V., Meyer-Lindenberg, A., & Windhagen, H. (2007).
Evaluation of the skin sensitizing potential of biodegradable magnesium alloys. Journal of
Biomedical Materials Research Part A, 1041e1047.
Witte, F., Fischer, J., Nellesen, J., Crostack, H. A., Kaese, V., Pisch, A., et al. (2006). In vitro and
in vivo corrosion measurements of magnesium alloys. Biomaterials, 7, 1013e1018.
Xin, Y., Hu, T., & Chu, P. K. (2011). In vitro studies of biomedical magnesium alloys in a
simulated physiological environment: a review. Acta Biomaterialia, 7, 1452e1459.

Index
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
Note: Page numbers followed by “f” and “t” indicate figures and tables, respectively.
A
Acid treatment, 238–239
Advanced therapy medicinal products
(ATMPs), 332–333, 333f–334f
Alkaline heat treatment (AHT), 33–35, 34f, 237
Alumina
biocompatibility and biodegradability of,
234t
-containing coatings, on biodegradable
Mg-based metals, 235
Aluminium
influence on stress corrosion cracking,
188–189, 189f
pharmacophysiology of, 144
American Society for Testing and Materials
(ASTM International), 336
Amino acids
effect on magnesium corrosion
performance, 210–214
coated magnesium performance,
211–214, 212f–213f
uncoated magnesium performance,
210–211, 210t, 211f–212f
-induced corrosion, buffer and atmosphere
effect on, 219–226, 219f–224f, 226f
physiological gap, bridging, 206–207
role in biocorrosion, 206–209
Anisotropy, of magnesium, 312
Anodization, 298–299
biodegradable magnesium alloys, 93–94.
See also Biodegradable magnesium
alloys
electrochemical surface modification, 55–56
Antibacterial effect, 276
Anticorrosive behavior, 270–271, 272t–273t
B
Bare-metal stents, 159
Bias sputtering, 95–96
Bioabsorbable behavior, of magnesium
alloys, 123–178
ex vivo test on bovine udder via
microdialysis, 129–130, 130f
general considerations for, 124–125
in vivo biocompatibility of magnesium
alloys, 140–150
energy dispersive X-ray analysis, 149
florescent microscopy, 149
general considerations for, 140
142f–143f
histology,
pharmacophysiology, 144–147, 145t–146t
scanning electron microscopy, 149
in vivo biodegradation of magnesium
energy dispersive X-ray analysis, 139,
general considerations for, 130–137,
scanning electron microscopy, 138–139,
volumetry, 137, 138f–139f
weight loss, determination of, 137–138
mechanical and corrosion properties,
chemical analysis, 150, 153t
histomorphometry, 149–150, 151t–152t,
m-computed tomography, 149–150
Bioactive glass coatings, 46–48, 47f
Biocompatibility, 29–30, 38–40, 140–142,
antibacterial effect, 276
assessment in vivo, 276–277
cellular, 271–274
hemocompatibility, 274–276, 275t
147–150
alloys, 130–140
140f
131f, 133t, 134f–136f
140f
125–127, 126t, 127f
153f
271–277. See also Biocompatibility
of surface modified magnesium-
based metals
–142,

356 Index
Biocompatibility of surface modified
magnesium-based metals, 231–260,
233t. See also Biocompatibility
alumina, 235
calcium phosphates, 232
factors influencing, 242f, 246–249
composition, 246–247
morphology, 246–247
physicochemical properties, 246–247
surface modification layer, degradation
resistance of, 247
surface-modified magnesium-based
metals, average degradation rate of,
247–249
future trends of, 249–250
in vitro results, 236–242
inorganic coating, 236–240, 236f, 237t
organic coating, 240–242, 241f–242f
in vivo findings, 243–246
inorganic coating, 243–245
organic coating, 245–246
magnesium fluoride, 234
magnesium phosphate, 232
magnesium silicate, 232–234
organic materials, 235–236
titania, 235
Biodegradable biomaterials, revolutionizing,
3–28
Biodegradable magnesium alloys
alloy elements for, 233t
biocompatibility and biodegradability of
coating materials on, 234t
surface design of. See Biodegradable
magnesium alloys, surface design of
Biodegradable magnesium alloys, surface
design of, 89–120
aims of, 99–100, 100f
future trends of, 114
issues associated with, 98–99, 98f–99f
research examples, 102–113
Ca-P based coatings, 105–107, 105f,
107f
composite
coatings, 111–113, 112f–113f
ion implantation, 109–111, 110f–111f
microarc oxidation coatings, 102–104,
103f
physical vapor deposition coatings,
108–109
polymer-based coatings, 107–108
surface modification in traditional
biometals, role of, 98
strategies in, 100–102
surface modification techniques, 89–97
chemical conversion coatings, 92–94
electrochemical deposition, 90–92
physical vapor deposition, 94–97
Biodegradation, in vivo. See Bioabsorbable
behavior, of magnesium alloys
Biofunctionality, 140–142
Biomimetic coating, 208–209, 211f,
216–218, 216f
Biomimetic treatment, 236f, 237t
inorganic coatings on biodegradable
magnesium alloy, 238
Biomolecules, coating with, 50–52, 51f
Bis-[triethoxysilyl] ethane (BTSE), 48–50
Blood vessels, testing of magnesium alloy
in, 159–161
coronary angiography, 161
coronary stents, 159
intravascular ultrasound, 161
magnesium stents, 159–160, 160f
optical coherence tomography, 161
Bone, testing of magnesium alloy in or on,
150–159
metallic implants, suitability of magnesium
for, 155–158, 157t, 158f
metallic nonresorbable implants, 150–155,
154t
resorbable polymer-based implants, 155, 156t
three -and four-point bending tests, 158–159
Bovine serum albumin (BSA), 207–208
Bovine udder ex vivo test on, via
microdialysis, 129–130, 130f
Buffer effect on amino acids/protein-
induced corrosion, 219–226,
219f–224f,
226f
Buffering agents, constituents and
concentrations of, 129t
C
Calcium, pharmacophysiology of, 144–147
Calcium phosphates
biocompatibility and biodegradability of,
234t
-containing coatings, on biodegradable
Mg-based metals, 232
glass ceramic coating, 44–46

Index 357
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
Ca-P based coatings, 105–107, 105f, 107f
Cathodic electrodeposition, 239
Cathodic plasma electrolytic deposition, 56–57
Cellular biocompatibility, 271–274
Cerium-based conversion coatings, 38–39
Characterization, of modified magnesium
and magnesium alloys, 263–282
future trends of, 277
mechanical properties, 264t
methods, 266–277
anticorrosive behavior, 270–271,
272t–273t
biocompatibility, 271–277
mechanical properties, 269–270
surface characteristics, 266–268
Chemical conversion coatings, 38–44, 92–94
anodization, 93–94
general aspects of, 92–93
microarc oxidation, 93–94, 93f
Chemical passivation, 35
Chemical surface modifications, 35–55
chemical conversion coatings, 38–44
chemical passivation, 35
coating with biomolecules, 50–52, 51f
polymer coatings, 52–55, 54f
reaction with ionic liquids, 35–36
self-assembled monolayers, 36–38, 37f
silane coatings, 48–50, 49f
sol-gel coatings, 44–48
Chemical vapor deposition (CVD), 94–95
Coatings
biomimetic, 208–209, 211f, 216–218, 216f
with biomolecules, 50–52, 51f
Ca-P based, 105–107, 105f, 107f
cerium-based conversion, 38–39
chemical conversion, 38–44, 92–
composite,
111–113, 112f–113f, 242, 242f
94
for corrosion control, 297–301
fluoride conversion, 41–44, 42f
inorganic. See Inorganic coating
nicotinic acid-based conversion, 38–39
organic, 240–241, 241f, 245–246
phosphate conversion, 39–40
phytic acid-based conversion, 40–41, 41f
polymer, 52–55, 54f
polymer-based, 107–108
silane, 48–50, 49f
sol-gel, 44–48
titanate-based conversion, 38–39
Co-Cr alloy, mechanical properties, 264t
Cold spray deposition, 69–72, 71f
Composite coating, 242, 242f
biodegradable magnesium alloys, 111–113,
112f–113f
Constant load testing (CLT), 190
Coronary angiography, 161
Coronary stents, 159
Corrosion failure mechanism, on coated
Mg-based materials, 101–102, 101f
Cumulative fatigue damage (CFD),
284–286, 289, 303
D
Degradable biomaterials, 29–30, 48–50, 52–53
Degradable implant, life cycle of, 311–312
Degradable magnesium implants,
biocompatibility testing and
marketing authorization of, 331–354
biological safety evaluation, 340–346, 341f
classification, 332–333
general principles of, 346
ISO 10993, 347, 348f
nonstandardized in vitro and in vivo
techniques, 350–351
specific considerations for, 348–350
standards for, 347
testing according to international standards,
335–340
standards,
development of, 337–338
standards, kinds of, 336–337, 337f
using standards, 339–340
Degradation-related mechanical properties,
316–318
environmentally assisted cracking, 317
fatigue strength, 318
material requirements, 316
strength retention, 317
wear resistance, 318
Diamond-like carbon (DLC), 102, 267–268
Dicalcium phosphate dihydrate (DCPD), 43
Drug-eluting stents (DES), 159
Ductility, 315
Dynamic interface, 98–99, 98f, 114
E
Electrochemical deposition, 90–92
Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy
(EIS), 5–6, 14f

358 Index
Electrochemical surface modification, 55–59
anodizing and microarc oxidation, 55–56
cathodic plasma electrolytic deposition,
56–57
electrodeposition. See Electrodeposition(ED)
electrophoretic deposition. See
Electrophoretic deposition (EPD)
Electrodeposition (ED), 43, 57–58, 90–91,
90f
Electroless deposition, 91–92, 91f–92f
Electron cyclotron resonance (ECR), 97
Electrophoretic deposition (EPD), 43, 58–59
Energy-assisted deposition, 95–96
Energy dispersive X-ray analysis (EDX)
in vivo biocompatibility of magnesium
alloys, 149
in vivo biodegradation of magnesium
alloys, 139, 140f
Environmentally assisted cracking, 317
Equal-channel angular pressing (ECAP),
295–297
European Committee for Electrotechnical
Standardization (CENELEC), 336
European Committee for Standardization
(CEN), 336
European Medicines Agency (EMA), 332
European Telecommunications Standards
Institute (ETSI), 336
Evaporation, 94
F
Fatigue
behavior of magnesium alloys, 284–289,
285f, 287f
crack growth rate and stress level,
relationships between, 287–288, 288f
strength, 318
surface treatments, effect of, 290–303
coatings, 297–301
future trends of, 303–304
ion implantation, 301–303
mechanical treatments, 290–297
testing under cyclic stress, 323–324
Fatigue crack propagation (FCP), 287–289,
303
Fe tolerance limit, 6
Fetal bovine serum (FBS), 207
Florescent microscopy, 149
Fluoride conversion coatings, 41–44, 42f
Food and Drug Administration (FDA), 332
Four-point bending tests, 158–159
Fractography, 193
Fracture mechanics-based approach, for
stress corrosion cracking, 195–198,
195f
–197f
G
Galvanic
corrosion, 17, 180–182
impurities, 181, 181f
secondary phases, 181–182, 182f
typical morphology of, 18f
Global Harmonization Task Force (GHTF),
332
H
Haematoxylin staining, 148
Hardness, 316
Hemocompatibility, 274–276, 275t
Hexagonal close-packed (HCP) system, 187
High-purity (HP) Mg, 4–5
corrosion of, 5f, 7f–8f
Histology, 147–150
Histomorphometry, 149–150
Human serum albumin (HAS), 207–208
Hydrogen-assisted stress corrosion cracking
(HASCC), 187, 192–193
Hydrogen embrittlement (HE), 187
Hydrogen evolution method, 5–6, 12–13
cathodic, 11
and corrosion behavior, 12–13, 12f
Hydrothermal treatment, 50, 72, 268
effect on corrosion behavior, 32–33, 33f
Hydroxyapatite (HA) coating, 44–46,
58–59, 101, 124
Hypermagnesemia, 131
Hypomagnesemia, 131
HZG (Helmhotz Zentrum Geesthacht) Mg
ingot, 6, 8f
I
Implantation-related mechanical properties,
313–316
ductility, 315
hardness, 316
material requirements, 313–315
stiffness, 315
strength, 315
toughness, 316

Index 359
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
Inorganic coating, 236–240, 236f, 237t
acid treatment, 238–239
alkaline treatment, 237
biomimetic treatment, 238
cathodic electrodeposition, 239
in vivo findings, 243–245
microarc oxidation treatment, 239–240
plasma enhanced chemical vapor
deposition, 240
plasma immersion ion implantation and
deposition, 240
Intergranular stress corrosion cracking
(IGSCC), 185–187
International Electrotechnical Commission
(IEC), 336
International Medical Device Regulators
Forum (IMDRF), 332
International Organization for
Standardization (ISO)
necessary modifications, 349
project deliverables, stages of, 338t
standard development process, 339f
ISO 10993, 344, 345t, 347, 348f
International Telecommunication Union
(ITU), 336
Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), 161
In vitro corrosion, 9, 11–13
comparison with in vivo, 16
In vitro testing, 320–324
biocompatibility, 140–150
chemical analysis, 150, 153t
energy dispersive X-ray analysis, 149
florescent microscopy, 149
general considerations for, 140–142,
142f–143f
histology, 147–150
histomorphometry, 149–150, 151t–152t,
153f
m-computed tomography, 149–150
pharmacophysiology, 144–147,
145t–146t
scanning electron microscopy, 149
degraded samples
with load, 322
without load, 321–322
after plastic deformation, 323
fatigue testing under cyclic stress, 323–324
mechanical tests without medium, 320–321
nonstandardized, 350–351
In vivo corrosion, 9, 11–13
comparison with in vitro, 16
In vivo testing, 324–327
animal models, suitability of, 324–325
biodegradation, 130–140
energy
dispersive X-ray analysis, 139,
140f
general considerations for, 130–137,
131f, 133t, 134f–136f
m-computed tomography, 135f–136f,
137, 138f–139f
scanning electron microscopy, 138–139,
140f
volumetry, 137, 138f–139f
weight loss, determination of, 137–138
degraded samples, 325
future trends of, 327
implants using functional animal models,
326–327
nonstandardized, 350–351
residual volumes, extrapolation of
mechanical properties from, 325–326
Ion assisted deposition (IAD), 95–96
Ion beam assisted deposition (IBAD), 95–96
Ion concentrations, 128t
Ionic liquids (ILs), reaction with chemical
surface modifications, 35–36
Ion implantation, 96–97, 96f
biodegradable magnesium alloys, 109–111,
110f–111f
effect on fatigue, 301–303
Ion plating, 61, 95–96
plasma-based, 95–96, 95f
Ion vapor deposition (IVD), 95–96
Iron
influence on stress corrosion cracking,
189–190
mechanical properties, 264t
J
Joule heating, 56–57
K
Kirschner wire (K-wire), 316
L
Laser-assisted coloring/darkening, 69
Laser-assisted surface patterning, 69
Laser composite surfacing, 68

360 Index
Laser shock peening (LSP), 68–69,
292–293, 293f
advantages and drawbacks of, 294t
Laser surface alloying (LSA), 67–68
Laser surface cladding (LSC), 68
Laser surface melting (LSM), 65–67, 66f
Laser surface modification, 65–69
Lithium, pharmacophysiology of, 147
Localized/pitting corrosion, 182–183, 183f
Low-purity Mg, 5
corrosion of, 5f
M
Magnesium alloys. See also individual
entries
corrosion of, 4–9
as implant material, 179–180
under severe conditions, testing of,
314t
stress corrosion cracking. See Stress
corrosion cracking (SCC)
Magnesium chloride (MgCl
), 131–132
2
Magnesium corrosion, 3
corrosion behavior, 12f
fishing-line specimens, 13
in vitro and in vivo comparison, 16
measurement of, 11–16
mechanism, 17
plug-in specimens, 13, 14f
Magnesium fluoride
biocompatibility and biodegradability of,
234t
-containing coatings, on biodegradable
Mg-based metals, 234
Magnesium implants, biomedical
applications of, 311, 320f
Magnesium metabolism, 131f
Magnesium metallurgy, 3
typical mounted specimen, 15f
Magnesium oxide (MgO), 30, 57–58,
131–132
Magnesium phosphate
biocompatibility and biodegradability of,
234t
-containing coatings, on biodegradable
Mg-based metals, 232
Magnesium silicate
biocompatibility and biodegradability of,
234t
-containing coatings, on biodegradable
Mg-based metals, 232–234
Magnesium stents, 159–160, 160f
Magnesium, surface modification of, 29–88
alkaline heat treatment, 33–35, 34f
chemical surface modifications, 35–55.
See also Chemical surface
modifications
electrochemical surface modification,
55–59. See also Electrochemical
surface modification
hydrothermal treatment, 32–33, 33f
laser surface modification, 65–69
alloying, 67–68
cladding, 68
composite surfacing, 68
laser-assisted coloring/darkening and
surface patterning, 69
melting, 65–67, 66f
shock peening, 68–69
plasma surface modification, 59–64.
See also Plasma surface modi
self-passivation,
30–32, 31f–32f
fication
Manganese (Mn), 101
influence on stress corrosion cracking, 189
Masson-Trichrome-Goldner stain, 148
Mechanical integrity of magnesium alloys,
179–204
galvanic corrosion, 180–182, 181f–182f
localized/pitting corrosion, 182–183, 183f
stress corrosion cracking. See Stress
corrosion cracking (SCC)
Mechanical properties, 269–270, 311–330,
313t
anisotropy, 312
degradation-related, 316–318
implantation-related, 313–316
in vitro testing, 320–324. See also In vitro
testing
degraded samples with load, 322
degraded samples without load, 321–322
degrading samples after plastic
deformation, 323
fatigue testing under cyclic stress,
323–324
mechanical tests without medium,
320–321
in vivo testing, 324–327. See also In vivo
testing

Index 361
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
animal models, suitability of, 324–325
degraded samples, 325
future trends of, 327
implants using functional animal models,
326–327
residual volumes, extrapolation of
mechanical properties from,
325–326
surface modifications effect, on implant
performance, 318–319
internal stresses, 319
surface chemistry, 319
surface structure, 319
Metallic implants, suitability of magnesium
for, 155–158, 157t, 158f
Metallic nonresorbable implants, 150–155,
154t
Microarc oxidation (MAO), 298–299
biodegradable magnesium alloys, 93–94,
93f, 102–104
electrochemical surface modification,
55–56
treatment, 239–240
m-computed tomography
in vivo biocompatibility of magnesium
alloys, 149–150
in vivo biodegradation of magnesium
alloys, 135f–136f, 137, 138f–139f
Microdialysis, ex vivo test on bovine udder
via, 129–130, 130f
Morphology, 266–268, 270f
Movat’s pentachrome stain, 149
N
Natural bone, mechanical
properties, 264t
Nicotinic acid-based conversion coatings,
38–39
Nitinol Ni–Ti, mechanical
properties, 264t
O
Open circuit potential (OCP), 187
Optical coherence tomography (OCT), 161
Organic coating, 240–241, 241f
in vivo findings, 245–246
Organic materials, 235–236
Organization for Economic Cooperation and
Development (OECD), 336
P
Paris’s law, 287–
Pharmacophysiology
289
of magnesium,
144–147, 145t–146t
Phase diagrams
Mg–Fe, 6, 7f
Mg–Fe–Zr, isothermal section through, 10f
Phosphate conversion coatings, 39–40
Physical vapor deposition (PVD), 59–60,
60f
biodegradable magnesium alloys, 94–97,
108–109
effect on fatigue, 299–301
Phytic acid-based conversion coatings,
40–41, 41f
Pilling–Bedworth (PB) ratio, 30
Plasma electrolytic oxidation (PEO). See
Microarc oxidation (MAO)
Plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition
(PECVD), 60–61, 61f
inorganic coatings on biodegradable
magnesium alloy, 240
Plasma immersion ion implantation (PIII),
62–64, 63t, 64f
biodegradable magnesium alloys, 97,
97f, 111
Plasma immersion ion implantation and
deposition (PIII&D)
biodegradable magnesium alloys, 97, 111
inorganic coatings on biodegradable
magnesium alloy, 240
Plasma surface modification, 59–64
ion plating, 61
physical vapor deposition, 59–60, 60f
plasma immersion ion implantation, 62–64,
63t, 64f
plasma-enhanced chemical vapor
deposition, 60–61, 61f
sputtering, 62
Plug-in specimen, 13, 16
assembly of, 14f–15f
Ply(L-lactic acid) (PLA), 124, 235–236
Polarization, 210–213, 217f, 222f, 224f
Poly(-caprolactone) (PCL), 52–54,
235–236
Polyether imide (PEI), 235–236
Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)
(PEDOT), 54–55
Poly(glycolic acid), 52
–53
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
