Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5371_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
02.09.2026
Размер:
19 Мб
Скачать
18
https://t.me/med1917
The aforementioned in vitro studies established a predominant role for CYP3A4 in the metabolism of nirmatrelvir (1). In order to overcome potentially suboptimal therapeutic exposures, nirmatrelvir (1) is co-dosed with the potent CYP3A4 inactivator ritonavir (2) as a pharmacoenhancer to boost its therapeutic concentrations.
In the past, pharmacoenhancers have been adopted for multiple purposes such as ensuring therapeutic exposure of the active product, reducing formation of toxic metabolites, changing the route of administration and increasing the cost-effectiveness of a therapy. Ritonavir (2) has been used as a pharmacoenhancer of several marketed protease inhibitors (e.g., darunavir and lopinavir) that are subject to metabolic clearance through CYP3A4. It is also a permeability-glycoprotein (P-gp) inhibitor, which further elevates the bioavailability of nirmatrelvir (1). It substantially elevates blood levels of co­administered CYP3A-dependent drugs, with increases in area-under-the-curve (AUC) blood concentrations ranging from 1.8- to 20-fold. In this case, co-administration with ritonavir (2) significantly improved the plasma concentration of nirmatrelvir (1).
On the other hand, ritonavir (2) is an inducer of several other CYP enzyme subtypes such as CYP1A2, CYP2B6, CYP2C9, and CYP2C19, as well as UDP­glucuronyl transferases. Thankfully, since induction occurs slowly (i.e., generally 10–15 days after initiation of inducer), it is not anticipated to cause significant drug–drug interactions (DDIs) as an inducer because of its short treatment course of 5 days.
Chemistry and Pharmacology of Drug Discovery
15
16
5. Efficacy and Safety
Paxlovid [two 150 mg of nirmatrelvir (1)/one 100 mg of ritonavir (2)] reduced the risk of hospitalization or death by 89% in high-risk individuals who took the drug within 3 days of experiencing symptoms.
In a randomized clinical trial (EPIC-HR) with 1 : 1 Paxlovid: placebo received orally every 12 h for 5 days, it was found that those receiving Paxlovid had significantly reduced hospital admissions and deaths among those affected by COVID-19. It was found that among participants who received treatment within 3 days of beginning
19
https://t.me/med1917
Chapter 1. Nirmatrelvir (Paxlovid)
COVID-19 symptoms, the risk of hospitalization or death was 89% lower than that for
17,18
the placebo group, without evidence of safety concerns.
Paxlovid’s safety has also been established. In vitro, nirmatrelvir (1) was remarkably selective against receptors, ion channels and other enzymes. It was also selective against other coronaviruses such as SARS-CoV-1, MERS-CoV and human coronavirus 229E using cytopathic effect (CPE) assays to measure their cellular antiviral activities. The drug was not a hERG substrate thus had a low potential for cardiotoxicity. Nirmatrelvir (1) was not mutagenic or clastogenic in in vitro genetic toxicity studies and was negative in an in vivo rat micronucleus assay. Finally, it was well tolerated in long-term toxicity tests in monkey
10
with no observed adverse effects at high doses.
Also in the EPIC-HR clinical trial, the incidence of adverse effects that emerged during or after the treatment period (treatment emergent adverse effects, TEAEs) was similar among recipients of Paxlovid (22.6%) and the placebo (23.9%). Most TEAEs in both treatment groups were mild to moderate (Grades 1–2) in severity. No patients in the Paxlovid group experienced an AE resulting in death (Grade 5), while there were 13 deaths among placebo recipients.
17,19
Now that millions of doses of Paxlovid have been taken in real world. Its efficacy and safety have been well established.
6. Synthesis
The first 7 mg of nirmatrelvir (1) were synthesized in late July 2020. A massive scale up effort was undertaken and by late October 100 g of nirmatrelvir (1) was synthesized and 2 weeks later the chemists were able to scale up the synthesis to even more than 1 kg.20
6.1. Scale-up Route
We first review the route that Pfizer used to make their 150-g batch.10
The pyrrolidone-containing fragment at P ester 20. A simple amination of 20 converted the ester to primary amide 21, which was treated with HCl to remove the Boc protection, furnishing the P HCl salt.
was prepared using known amino-
1
fragment as 22 as its
1
20
https://t.me/med1917
Chemistry and Pharmacology of Drug Discovery
Meanwhile, dimethylcyclopropylproline ester 23 was coupled with (S)-tert­leucine 24 to assemble amides 25. Hydrolysis of the ester functionality on 25 using lithium hydroxide then provided acid 26, which was treated HCl to afford the “naked” amino-acid 27 as its HCl salt. Condensation of 27 with ethyl trifluoroacetate led to the formation of trifluoroacetamide 28. Another key coupling between 28 and 22 assembled dipeptide 29, which was readily dehydrated to deliver nirmatrelvir (1) as its methyl t- butylether (MTBE) solvate after recrystallization using a mixture of MTBE and ethyl
10
acetate. Since each step has a high yield, the overall yield is 48% to make nirmatrelvir (1) from lactam 22. Boc protection/deprotection (twice!) and the employment of the Burgess reagent as the dehydrating reagent to make the nitrile are not amenable to commercial-scale production, which mounts to hundreds of tons of the API. Pfizer development chemists developed better synthesis for large-scale synthesis. Before disclosure of Pfizer’s manufacturing route, we highlight a few examples among numerous efforts at optimizing the production of nirmatrelvir (1).
21
https://t.me/med1917
Chapter 1. Nirmatrelvir (Paxlovid)
A group at Virginia Commonwealth University chose to use trifluoroacetic anhydride (TFAA) to replace expensive Burgess reagent, which also left behind a lot of by-product waste. As shown below, treating primary amide 29 with 2 equiv of TFAA and 2 equiv of N-methylmorpholine (NMM) delivered nirmatrelvir (1) as its methyl t- butylether (MTBE) solvate in 85% yield after recrystallization using a mixture of MTBE and ethyl acetate. The group also employed propanephosphonic acid anhydride (T3P) as the obvious replacement of Pfizer’s coupling agents, HATU and EDCI, with good
21
results.
22
https://t.me/med1917
Chemistry and Pharmacology of Drug Discovery
In 2023, a group in India published a preparation of nirmatrelvir (1) using flow chemistry. They chose to make the nitrile sooner than Pfizer did. To that end, dehydration of primary amide 21 with TFAA to give nitrile 30, which was treated with HCl to produce the P and acid 28 using T3P as the coupling agent delivered nirmatrelvir (1) directly.
fragment as amine 31 as its HCl salt. Finally, coupling between amine 31
1
21
It could be advantageous to make the nitrile sooner than doing it at the last step.
Also in 2023, a group in China published an optimized synthesis of a key intermediate of nirmatrelvir, primary amide 21. Thus, deprotonation of dimethyl N- BocGlu (32) using LiHMDS was followed by α-cyanomethylation with bromoacetonitrile in the presence of NdCl group with concomitant cyclization and ammonolysis and subsequent deprotection of N-
. A one-pot Raney nickel-catalyzed hydrogenation of the nitrile
3
23
https://t.me/med1917
Boc to deliver the target intermediate cyclic glutamine analog in three steps in high
22,23
yields. This route reduced side reactions and undesired by-products. The operations are simple. But using LiHMDS is not my favorite feature.
Chapter 1. Nirmatrelvir (Paxlovid)
6.2. Manufacturing Route
In 2023, Pfizer Process Chemistry published their manufacturing route for nirmatrelvir (1), which took 17 months from first laboratory synthesis (in July 2020) to FDA emergency use authorization (in December 2021). The manufacturing route starts over 100 metric tons of starting raw materials, so the cost and even supply chain considerations were paramount, especially during the COVID pandemic.
24
24
https://t.me/med1917
Starting material 23 was prepared by Merck/Codexis before for their HCV NS3 serine protease inhibitors program to make boceprevir (8). The HCl salt of 23 was at first basified with triethylamine to release the free amine and the methyl ester was converted to its corresponding sodium salt 34 by the treatment of NaOH. Treating acid 35 with mesylate gave rise to a mixed anhydride, which was coupled with 34 to assemble 28. The coupling between acid 28 with amine 31 was accomplished by EDAC to provide adduct 29 with the aid of 2-hydroxypyridine N-oxide (HOPO), which has been known to reduce racemization. Treating primary amide with TFAA afforded nitrile 36 as the MTBE solvate, which was converted to anhydrous Form I of nirmatrelvir (1).
Chemistry and Pharmacology of Drug Discovery
24
7. Summary
The discovery and development of nirmatrelvir (1)/Paxlovid has been an important chapter in the annals of pharmaceutical industry. The drug literally saved lives.
25
https://t.me/med1917
Pfizer’s triumph has been built on decades of progress made in the field of protease inhibitors. As we see throughout this chapter, the pyrrolidone substituent at P the rigid bicyclic dimethylcyclopropylproline at P been precedented. Needless to say, ritonavir (2) as a PK enhancer was discovered in the 1990s when the first wave of HIV protease inhibitors became available. After all, if we have seen further, it is by standing on shoulders of giants.
Chapter 1. Nirmatrelvir (Paxlovid)
and the nitrile warhead at P1′ have all
2
References
1. Focosi, D.; McConnell, S.; Shoham, S.; Casadevall, A.; Maggi, F.;
Antonelli, G. Nirmatrelvir and COVID-19: development, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, resistance, relapse and pharmacoeconomics. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2023, 61, 106708.
2. Halford, B. The path to Paxlovid: how Pfizer scientists transformed an
old drug lead into an oral COVID-19 antiviral. ACS Cent. Sci. 2022, 8, 405–407.
3. Unoh, Y.; Uehara, S.; Nakahara, K.; Nobori, H.; Yamatsu, Y.;
Yamamoto, S.; Maruyama, Y.; Taoda, Y.; Kasamatsu, K.; Suto, T.; et al. Discovery of S-217622, a noncovalent oral SARS-CoV-2 3CL protease inhibitor clinical candidate for treating COVID-19. J. Med. Chem. 2022, 65, 6499−6512.
4. Gorkhali, R.; Koirala, P.; Rijal, S.; Mainali, A.; Baral, A.; Bhattarai, H.
K. Structure and function of major SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV proteins. Bioinf. Biol. Insights 2021, 15, 11779322211025876.
5. Cannalire, R.; Cerchia, C.; Beccari, A. R.; Di Leva, F. S.; Summa, V.
Targeting SARS-CoV-2 proteases and polymerase for COVID-19 treatment: state of the art and future opportunities. J. Med. Chem. 2022, 65, 2716−2746.
6. Chen, R.; Gao, Y.; Liu, H.; Li, H.; Chen, W.; Ma, J. Advances in
research on 3C-like protease (3CLpro) inhibitors against SARS-CoV-2 since 2020. RSC Med. Chem. 2023, 14, 9−21.
7. Kneller, D.W.; Phillips, G.; O’Neill, H.M.; Jedrzejczak, R.; Stols, L.;
Langan, P.; Joachimiak, A.; Coates, L.; Kovalevsky, A. Structural plasticity of SARS-CoV-2 3CL Mpro active site cavity revealed by room temperature X-ray crystallography. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11,
3202.
8. Schechter, I.; Berger, A. On the size of the active site in proteases. I.
Papain. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1967, 27, 157–162.
,
1
26
https://t.me/med1917
9. Owen, D. R.; Allerton, C. M. N.; Anderson, A. S.; Aschenbrenner, L.;
10. Hoffman, R. L.; Kania, R. S.; Brothers, M. A.; Davies, J. F.; Ferre, R.
11. Joyce, R. P.; Hu, V. W.; Wang, J. The history, mechanism and
12. Ma, C. L.; Sacco, M. D.; Hurst, B.; Townsend, J. A.; Hu, Y. M.; Szeto,
13. Fu, L.; Ye F., Feng, Y.; Yu, F.; Wang, Q.; Wu, Y.; Zhao, C.; Sun, H.;
14. Ahren, B.; Schweizer, A.; Dejager, S.; Villhauer, E. B.; Dunning, B. E.;
15. Girardin, F.; Manuel, O.; Marzolini, C.; Buclin, T. Evaluating the risk
16. Martins, V.; Fazal, L.; Oganesian, A.; Shah, A.; Stow, J.; Walton, H.;
17. Hammond, J.; Leister-Tebbe, H.; Gardner, A.; Abreu, P.; Bao, W.;
18. Ghosh, A. K.; Mishevich, J. L.; Mesecar, A.; Mitsuya, H. Recent drug
Chemistry and Pharmacology of Drug Discovery
Avery, M.; Berritt, S.; Boras, B.; Cardin, R. D.; Carlo, A.; Coffman, K. J.; et al. An oral SARS-CoV-2 Mpro inhibitor clinical candidate for the treatment of COVID-19. Science 2021, 374, 1586–1593.
A.; Gajiwala, K. S.; He, M.; Hogan, R. J.; Kozminski, K.; Li, L. Y.; et al. Discovery of ketone-based covalent inhibitors of coronavirus 3CL proteases for the potential therapeutic treatment of COVID-19. J. Med. Chem. 2020, 63, 12725–12747.
perspectives of nirmatrelvir (PF-07321332): an orally bioavailable main protease inhibitor used in combination with ritonavir to reduce COVID-19-related hospitalizations. Med. Chem. Res. 2022, 31, 1637–
1646.
T.; et al. Boceprevir, GC-376 and calpain inhibitors II, XII inhibit SARS-CoV-2 viral replication by targeting the viral main protease. Cell Res. 2020, 30, 678–92.
Huang, B.; Niu, P.; et al. Both Boceprevir and GC376 efficaciously inhibit SARS-CoV-2 by targeting its main protease. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 4417.
Foley, J. E. Mechanisms of action of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor vildagliptin in humans. Diabetes Obes. Metab. 2011, 13, 775–
783.
of drug-drug interactions with pharmacokinetic boosters: the case of ritonavir-enhanced nirmatrelvir to prevent severe COVID-19. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2022, 28, 1044–1046.
Wilsher, N. A commentary on the use of pharmacoenhancers in the pharmaceutical industry and the implication for DMPK drug discovery strategies. Xenobiotica 2022, 52, 786–796.
Wisemandle, W.; Baniecki, M.; Hendrick, V. M.; Damle, B.; Simon­Campos, A.; et al. Oral nirmatrelvir for high-risk, nonhospitalized adults with Covid-19. N. Engl. J. Med. 2022, 386, 1397–1408.
development and medicinal chemistry approaches for the treatment of
27
https://t.me/med1917
19. Akinosoglou, K.; Schinas, G.; Gogos, C. Oral antiviral treatment for
20. Halford, B. Pfizer unveils its oral SARS-CoV-2 inhibitor: The antiviral
21. Kadam, A. L.; Chiranjeevi, B.; Nunes, A. A.; Jayaraman, A.; Ahmad,
22. Veeramani, K.; Shinde, M.; Eda, V. V. R.; Darapaneni, B. C.;
23. Qin, H.; Jin, C.; Odilov, A.; Mintah Bonku, E.; Zhu, F.; Liu, Q.; Shen,
24. Allais, C.; Ragan, J. A. Development of the commercial manufacturing
Chapter 1. Nirmatrelvir (Paxlovid)
SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19. ChemMedChem 2022, 17, e202200440.
COVID-19: a comprehensive review on nirmatrelvir/ritonavir. Viruses 2022, 14, 2540.
candidate is the first orally administered compound to enter clinical trials that targets the virus’s main protease. Chem. Eng. News 2021, 99(13), 2021.
S.; Aleshire, S. L.; Donsbach, K. O.; Gupton, B. F.; Nuckols, M. C.; Shanahan, C. S. Efforts to develop a cost-effective and scalable synthetic process for nirmatrelvir. ChemRxiv 2022, 1–14.
Hindupur, R. M.; Madarapu, S. R.; Sen, S.; Oruganti, S. Alternate end­game strategies towards nirmatrelvir synthesis: defining a continuous flow process for the preparation of an anti-COVID drug. Tetrahedron Lett. 2023, 116, 154344.
J.; Aisa, H. A. Optimized synthesis of a key intermediate of nirmatrelvir. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2023, 27, 78–83.
process for nirmatrelvir in 17 months. ACS Cent. Sci. 2023, 9, 849–
857.