Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_3774_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
02.09.2026
Размер:
20 Мб
Скачать
15 Biomarkers inVascular Disease
https://t.me/medicina_free
357
observational data is probably the best hope in the hunt for biomarker patterns that can truly inuence disease management.
15.10 Conclusion
Biomarkers are likely to have increased utility in the future of vascular surgery. To date no biomarker for AAA or carotid stenosis has been translated into clinical prac­tice. However, with advances in mass spectrometry and proteomic techniques com­bined with worldwide interest in this discovery science, a signicant discovery is likely to not be far away. In the future, the decision to operate on a dilated aorta or carotid stenosis may be guided by the presence of a specic protein in the patient’s serum, and no longer simply the morphology of the lesion.
References
1. Arthur JA, Wayne AC, Victor GD, David LD, Gregory JD, Daniel FH, etal. Biomarkers and
surrogate endpoints: preferred denitions and conceptual framework. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2001;69:89–95. https://doi.org/10.1067/mcp.2001.113989.
2. Fox N, Growdon JH.Biomarkers and surrogates. NeuroRx. 2004;1:181.
3. Katus HA, Remppis A, Neumann FJ, Scheffold T, Diederich KW, Vinar G, etal. Diagnostic
efciency of troponin T measurements in acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1991;83:902–12.
4. Babuin L, Jaffe AS. Troponin: the biomarker of choice for the detection of cardiac injury.
CMAJ. 2005;173:1191–202. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj/051291.
5. Weintraub NL.Understanding abdominal aortic aneurysm. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:1114–6.
6. Brady AR, Thompson SG, Fowkes FGR, Greenhalgh RM, Powell JT.Abdominal aortic aneu-
rysm expansion: risk factors and time intervals for surveillance. Circulation. 2004;110:16–21.
7. Bown MJ, Sutton AJ, Bell PR, Sayers RD.A meta-analysis of 50 years of ruptured abdominal
aortic aneurysm repair. Br J Surg. 2002;89:714–30.
8. Nicholls SC, Gardner JB, Meissner MH, Johansen HK. Rupture in small abdominal aortic
aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 1998;28:884–8.
9. Lederle FA, Johnson GR, Wilson SE, Ballard DJ, Jordan WJ, Blebea J, et al. Rupture
rate of large abdominal aortic aneurysms in patients refusing or unt for elective repair. JAMA. 2002;287:2968–72.
10. Eugster T, Huber A, Obeid T, Schwegler I, Gurke L, Stierli P. Aminoterminal propeptide of
type III procollagen and matrix metalloproteinases-2 and -9 failed to serve as serum markers for abdominal aortic aneurysm. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2005;29:378–82.
11. Zweers MC, Peeters AC, Graafsma S, Kranendonk S, van der Vliet JA, den Heijer M, etal.
Abdominal aortic aneurysm is associated with high serum levels of tenascin-X and decreased aneurysmal tissue tenascin-X.Circulation. 2006;113:1702–7.
12. Lindholt JS, Heickendorff L, Henneberg EW, Fasting H. Serum elastin peptides as a pre-
dictor of expansion of small abdominal aortic aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1997; 14:12–6.
13. Lindholt JS, Ashton HA, Heickendorff L, Scott RA.Serum elastin peptides in the preoperative
evaluation of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2001;22:546–50. https://
doi.org/10.1053/ejvs.2001.1516.
358
https://t.me/medicina_free
14. Lindholt JS, Vammen S, Fasting H, Henneberg EW, Heickendorff L. The plasma level of
matrix metalloproteinase 9 may predict the natural history of small abdominal aortic aneu­rysms. A preliminary study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2000;20:281–5.
15. McMillan WD, Pearce WH. Increased levels of metalloproteinase-9 are associated with
abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 1999;29:122–7.
16. Takagi H, Manabe H, Kawai N, Goto S-N, Umemoto T.Circulating matrix metalloproteinase-9
concentrations and abdominal aortic aneurysm presence: a meta-analysis. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2009;9:437–40.
17. Vega de Ceniga M, Esteban M, Quintana JM, Barba A, Estallo L, de la Fuente N, etal. Search
for serum biomarkers associated with abdominal aortic aneurysm growth—pilot study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2009;37:297–9.
18. Lindholt JS, Jorgensen B, Klitgaard NA, Henneberg EW. Systemic levels of Cotinine and
Elastase, but not pulmonary function, are associated with the progression of small abdomonal aortic aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2003;26:418–22.
19. Al-Barjas HS, Ariens R, Grant P, Scott JA.Raised plasma brinogen concentration in patients
with abdominal aortic aortic aneurysm. Angiology. 2006;57:607–14.
20. Golledge J, Muller R, Clancy P, McCann M, Norman PE.Evaluation of the diagnostic and prog-
nostic value of plasma D-dimer for abdominal aortic aneurysm. Eur Heart J. 2011;32:354–64.
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehq171.
21. Moroz P, Le MT, Norman PE. Homocysteine and abdominal aortic aneurysms. ANZ J Surg.
2007;77:329–32.
22. Iyer V, Rowbotham S, Biros E, Bingley J, Golledge J. A systematic review investigating
the association of microRNAs with human abdominal aortic aneurysms. Atherosclerosis. 2017;261:78–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2017.03.010.
23. Wanhainen A, Mani K, Vorkapic E, De Basso R, Björck M, Länne T, etal. Screening of circulat-
ing microRNA biomarkers for prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysm and aneurysm growth. Atherosclerosis. 2017;256:82–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2016.11.007.
24. Norman PE, Spencer CA, Lawrence-Brown MM, Jamrozik K. C-reactive protein lev-
els and the expansion of screen detected abdominal aortic aneurysms in men. Circulation. 2004;110:862–6.
25. Rohde LE, Arroyo LH, Rifai N, Creager MA, Libby P, Ridker PM, etal. Plasma concentra-
tions of interleukin-6 and abdominal aortic diameter among subjects without aortic dilatation. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1999;19:1695–9.
26. Wenrui H, Shihua G, Shuonan W, Jinchao X, Michael RG, Avner F, etal. A mathematical
model of aortic aneurysm formation. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0170807.
journal.pone.0170807
27. Golledge J, Muller J, Shephard N, Clancy P, Smallwood L, Mpran C, et al. Association
between osteopontin and human abdominal aortic aneurysm. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2007;27:655–60.
28. Moran CS, McCann M, Karan M, Norman PE, Ketheesan N, Golledge J. Association
of osteoprotegerin with human abdominal aortic aneurysm progression. Circulation. 2005;111:3119–25.
29. Golledge J, Clancy P, Jamrozik K, Norman PE. Obesity, adipokines, and abdominal aortic
aneurysm: health in men study. Circulation. 2007;116:2275–9.
30. The UK Small Aneurysm Trial Participants. Smoking, lung function and the prognosis of
abdominal aortic aneurysm. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2000;19:636–42.
31. Wilson WRW, Anderton M, Choke E, Dawson J, Loftus IM, Thompson MM. Elevated
plasma MMP1 and MMP9 are associated with abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2008;35:580–4.
32. Jalalzadeh H, Indrakusuma R, Planken RN, Legemate DA, Koelemay MJW, Balm
R.Inammation as a predictor of abdominal aortic aneurysm growth and rupture: a system­atic review of imaging biomarkers. Eur J Vasc Endovas Surg. 2016;52:333–42. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2016.05.002.
.
A. Cadersa and I. M. Nordon
https://doi.org/10.1371/
15
https://t.me/medicina_free
Biomarkers inVascular Disease
33. Forsythe RO, Dweck MR, McBride OMB, Vesey AT, Semple SI, Shah ASV, etal. F-sodium
uoride uptake in abdominal aortic aneurysms: the SoFIA study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71:513–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2017.11.053.
34. Sangiorgi G, D’Averio R, Mauriello A, Bondio M, Pontillo M, Castelvecchio S, etal. Plasma
levels of metalloproteinases-3 and -9 as markers of successful abdominal aortic aneurysm exclusion after endovascular graft treatment. Circulation. 2001;104:I288–95.
35. Ng E, Morris DR, Golledge J.The association between plasma matrix metalloproteinase-9
concentration and endoleak after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair: a meta-analysis. Atherosclerosis. 2015;242:535–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2015.08.016.
36. Hermus L, Lefrandt JD, Tio RA, Breek J-C, Zeebregts CJ. Carotid plaque forma-
tion and serum biomarkers. Atherosclerosis. 2010;213:21–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
atherosclerosis.2010.05.013.
37. Schillinger M, Exner M, Mlekusch W, Sabeti S, Amighi J, Nikowitsch R, etal. Inammation
and carotid artery—risk for atherosclerosis study (ICARAS). Circulation. 2005;111:2203–9.
38. Rost NS, Wolf PA, Kase CS, Kelly-Hayes M, Silbershatz H, Massaro JM, etal. Plasma con-
centration of C-reactive protein and risk of ischaemic stroke and transient ischaemic attack: the Framingham study. Stroke. 2001;32:2575–9.
39. Koutouzis M, Rallidis LS, Peros G, Nomikos A, Tzavara V, Barbatis C, etal. Serum interleukin-
6 is elevated in symptomatic carotid bifurcation disease. Acta Neurol Scand. 2009;119:119–25.
40. Mannheim D, Herrmann J, Versari D, Gossl M, Meyer FB, McConnell JP, etal. Enhanced
expression of Lp-PLA2 and lysophosphatidylcholine in symptomatic carotid atherosclerotic plaques. Stroke. 2008;39:1448–55.
41. Kietselaer BL, Reutelingsperger CP, Heidendal GA, Daemen MJ, Mess WH, Hofstra L, etal.
Noninvasive detection of plaque instability with use of radiolabelled annexin A5in patients with carotid artery stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:1472–3.
42. Sayed S, Cockerill GW, Torsney E, Poston R, Thompson MM, Loftus IM. Elevated tissue
expression of thrombomodulatory factors correlates with acute symptomatic carotid plaque phenotype. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2009;38:20–5.
43. Sabeti S, Exner M, Mlekusch W, Amighi J, Quehenberger P, Rumpold H, et al. Prognostic
impact of brinogen in carotid atherosclerosis: nonspecic indicator of inammation or inde­pendent predictor of disease progression? Stroke. 2005;36:1400–4.
44. Loftus IM, Naylor AR, Goodall S, Crowther M, Jones L, Bell PR, et al. Increased matrix
metalloproteinase-9 activity in unstable carotid plaques. A potential role in acute plaque dis­ruption. Stroke. 2000;31:40–7.
45. Alvarez B, Ruiz C, Chacon P, Alvarez-Sabin J, Matas M.Serum values of metalloproteinase-2
and metalloproteinase-9 as related to unstable plaque and inammatory cells in patients with greater than 70% carotid artery stenosis. J Vasc Surg. 2004;40:469–75.
46. Eilenberg W, Stojkovic S, Piechota-Polanczyk A, Kaider A, Kozakowski N, Weninger WJ,
et al. Neutrophil gelatinase associated lipocalin (NGAL) is elevated in type 2 diabetics with carotid artery stenosis and reduced under metformin treatment. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2017;16:98. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12933-017-0579-6.
47. Nakamura M, Tachieda R, Niinuma H, Ohira A, Endoh S, Hiramori K, etal. Circulating bio-
chemical marker levels of collagen metabolism are abnormal in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm. Angiology. 2000;51:385–92.
48. Satta J, Haukipuro K, Kairaluoma MI, Juvonen T. Aminoterminal propeptide of type III
procollagen in the follow-up of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 1997;25:909–15.
49. Lindholt JS, Erlandsen EJ, Henneberg EW. Cystatin C deciency is associated with the
progression of small abdominal aortic aneurysms. Br J Surg. 2001;88:1472–5. https://doi.
org/10.1046/j.0007-1323.2001.01911.x.
50. Halazun KJ, Bofkin KA, Asthana S, Evans C, Henederson M, Spark JI.Hyperhomocysteinaemia
is associated with the rate of abdominal aortic aneurysm expansion. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2007;33:391–4.
359
360
https://t.me/medicina_free
51. Yamazumi K, Ojiro M, Okumura H, Aikou T. An activated state of blood coagulation and
brinolysis in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm. Am J Surg. 1998;175:297–301.
52. Lindholt JS, Ashton HA, Scott RA.Indicators of infection with chlamydia pneumoniae are
associated with expansion of abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2001;34:212–5.
53. Mallat Z, Corbaz A, Scoazec A, Besnard S, Leseche G, Chvatchko Y, et al. Expression of
interleukin18in human atherosclerotic plaques and relation to plaque instability. Circulation. 2001;104:1598–603.
54. Sugioka K, Naruko T, Matsumara Y, Shirai N, Hozumi T, Yoshiyama M, et al. Neopterin
and atherosclerotic plaque instability in coronary and carotid arteries. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2010;17:1115–21.
55. Handberg A, Skjelland M, Miichelsen AE, Sagen EL, Krohg-Sorensen K, Russell D, etal.
Soluble CD36 in plasma is increased in patients with symptomatic atherosclerotic carotid plaques and is related to plaque instability. Stroke. 2008;39:3092–5.
A. Cadersa and I. M. Nordon
Further Reading
Golledge J, Tsao PS, Dalman RL, Norman PE.Circulating markers of abdominal aortic aneurysm
presence and progression. Circulation. 2008;118:2382–92. Groeneveld ME, Meekel JP, Rubinstein SM, Merkestein LR, Tangelder GJ, Wisselink W, Truijers
M, Yeung KK.Systematic review of circulating, biomechanical, and genetic markers for the
prediction of abdominal aortic aneurysm growth and rupture. JAHA. 2018;7(13). Hermus L, Lefrandt JD, Tio RA, Breek J-C, Zeebregts CJ.Carotid plaque formation and serum
biomarkers. Atherosclerosis. 2010;213:21–9. Hlatky MA, Greenland P, Arnett DK, Ballantyne CM, Criqui MH, Elkind MSV, Go AS, Harrell
FE, Howard BV, Howard VJ, P.Y.H, Kramer CM, McConnell JP, Normand S-LP, O’Donnell
CJ, Smith SJ, Wilson PWF. Criteria for evaluation of novel markers of cardiovascular risk.
Circulation. 2009;119:2408–16. Nordon IM, Brar R, Hinchliffe RJ, Cockerill GW, Loftus IM, Thompson MM.The role of pro-
teomic research in vascular disease. J Vasc Surg. 2009;49:1602–12. Vasan RS. Biomarkers of vascular disease: Molecular basis and practical considerations.
Circulation. 2006;113:2335–62.
Chapter 16
https://t.me/medicina_free
Pathophysiology andPrinciples ofManagement ofVasculitis andFibromuscular Dysplasia
MaureenRischmueller, SarahDownie-Doyle, andRobertFitridge
Key Learning Points
Early recognition and treatment of vasculitis leads to reduced morbidity and
mortality.
• Severity and prognosis of vasculitic conditions are dictated by the pathology,
size, and distribution of affected blood vessels.
Giant cell arteritis is characterised by a biphasic inammatory process, with the
glucocorticoid-responsive Th17 (IL-6/IL-17)-mediated pathway driving sys-
temic inammation in early disease, and poorly glucocorticoid-responsive Th1
(IL-12/IFNγ)-mediated mechanisms promoting chronicity of inammation in
blood vessel walls.
• Aortitis and retroperitoneal brosis are characteristic features of IgG4-related
disease.
M. Rischmueller (*) Rheumatology Department, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville, SA, Australia
Rheumatology Department, Royal Darwin Hospital, Darwin, NT, Australia
Discipline of Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia e-mail: Maureen.Rischmueller@sa.gov.au
S. Downie-Doyle Rheumatology Department, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville, SA, Australia e-mail: Sarah.Downie-Doyle@sa.gov.au
R. Fitridge Discipline of Surgery, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, The University of Adelaide, Woodville, SA, Australia e-mail: robert.tridge@adelaide.edu.au
R. Fitridge (ed.), Mechanisms of Vascular Disease,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43683-4_16
361© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020
362
https://t.me/medicina_free
• Cancer immunotherapy targeting immune checkpoints is a newly recognised
cause of vasculitis.
• Fibromuscular disease is a non-atherosclerotic arterial disease which pre-
dominantly affects women aged from 45 to 55 at time of diagnosis. FMD may
be asymptomatic or cause thrombosis, aneurysm development and/or
dissection.
• Fibromuscular disease most frequently affects the renal and cerebrovascular
arteries. FMD lesions should be classied according to appearance on angiogra-
phy as focal or multifocal FMD.
M. Rischmueller et al.
16.1 Introduction
Vasculitis covers a broad array of clinicopathological diseases, from transient localised cutaneous reactions, to clinical manifestations of systemic diseases, to fulminant life-threatening diseases dominated by widespread inammation, occlusion and rupture of blood vessels. There is great diversity in pathophysiol­ogy, clinical presentation, diagnosis and management. Cutaneous lesions such as petechiae, livedo reticularis, purpura, nodules and ulcers raise the suspicion of vasculitis, which also commonly affects organs and tissues including lungs, kid­neys, peripheral nerves, muscles, and the gastrointestinal tract. Patients are often systemically unwell with malaise, fever, weight loss, arthralgia, normochromic normocytic anaemia and have raised inammatory markers. History is important and should include the onset and evolution of symptoms, systems review, preced­ing infections, exposure to drugs and toxins, and relevant family history. Full blood count, electrolytes, renal and hepatic function, C reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and, where relevant, viral titres, autoanti­bodies, and cryoglobulins should be measured. Urinalysis is important to identify renal involvement, typied by red cells, casts, or proteinuria, as prompt treatment may avert irreversible renal failure. Biopsy remains the gold standard for histo­pathological conrmation of vasculitis, and in addition to formalin xation, a fresh sample should be provided for immunouorescent labelling of immune complexes and complement if small vessel vasculitis is suspected. Imaging is paramount when a biopsy is unobtainable and, in large vessel vasculitis, is useful to determine the extent of disease.
Comorbidities are common, including treatment-related toxicities such as corticosteroid- induced obesity, mood disorders, skin fragility, bruising, osteopo­rotic fractures, peptic ulcer disease, diabetes, dyslipidaemia, hypertension, acceler­ated atherosclerosis, cataracts, glaucoma, and immunosuppression predisposing individuals to common and opportunistic infections. Vaccination against inuenza, pneumococcus, and pertussis should be up to date, and prophylaxis against
16 Pathophysiology andPrinciples ofManagement ofVasculitis andFibromuscular…
https://t.me/medicina_free
pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia should be prescribed for patients taking high doses of glucocorticoids. It should be noted that vaccination with live vaccines such as Zostavax (attenuated varicella-zoster virus vaccine) are contraindicated in the setting of immunosuppression because of the risk of disseminated viral disease. Baseline assessment of bone mineral density, and treatment to prevent or manage steroid-induced osteoporosis is standard of care. Small and large vessel vasculitis is associated with an increased risk of contemporaneous malignancy, particularly in elderly patients, and clinical examination supplemented by relevant investigations should be undertaken.
The aetiology of most vasculitides is unknown, with management directed towards the prevention and treatment of organ damage, maintenance of a low inflammatory state, titration of therapy according to clinical, serologic and imaging parameters, management of comorbidities, and prevention and man­agement of treatment-related side effects. This chapter will outline the main types of vasculitis encountered in clinical practice, describe known pathoge­netic mechanisms, and present management strategies. In addition to vasculitis, Raynaud’s phenomenon, thromboangiitis obliterans and fibromuscular dyspla­sia will be discussed.
363
16.2 Primary Versus Secondary Vasculitis
Vasculitis is caused by immune-mediated inammation of blood vessels. In most cases the underlying cause of this reaction is unknown, and the term “primary” is often applied, whereas in a subset of cases the vasculitis is triggered by a known drug or virus or is a manifestation of an underlying systemic disease and is thus termed “secondary”. Categorization into primary versus secondary vas­culitis becomes problematic, however, as more aetiologies are discovered. Vasculitis has more recently been divided according to the size and type of blood vessel involved, which has merit given that similar organs and tissues are affected. The discovery of anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCAs) associated with a subset of patients with small vessel vasculitis, causative viruses and gene mutations in a subset of patients previously diagnosed with polyarteri­tis nodosa, and the evolution of modern imaging techniques such as magnetic resonance imaging/angiography (MRI/MRA) and positron emission tomography (PET), has led to further subclassication of vasculitis. Table 16.1 shows the names for vasculitides adopted by the 2012 International Chapel Hill Consensus Conference of the nomenclature of vasculitides [1]. Technology-led advances in our understanding of mechanisms of disease initiation and progression, as well as insights emerging from empiric trials of targeted biologic therapies, will con­tinue to inform this area.
364
M. Rischmueller et al.
https://t.me/medicina_free
Table 16.1
vasculitides adopted by the 2012 International Chapel Hill Consensus Conference on the Nomenclature of Vasculitides [
Names for
1]
Large vessel vasculitis (LVV)
Takayasu arteritis (TAK) Giant cell arteritis (GCA)
Medium vessel vasculitis (MVV)
Polyarteritis nodosa (PAN) Kawasaki disease (KD)
Small vessel vasculitis (SVV)
Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated
vasculitis (AAV) Microscopic polyangiitis (MPA) Granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Wegener’s) (GPA) Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Churg-
Strauss) (EGPA) Immune complex SVV Anti-glomerular basement membrane (anti-GBM)
disease Cryoglobulinemic vasculitis (CV) IgA vasculitis (Henoch-Schönlein) (IgAV) Hypocomplementemic urticarial vasculitis (HUV)
(anti-C1q vasculitis)
Variable vessel vasculitis (VVV)
Behcet’s disease (BD) Cogan’s syndrome (CS)
Single-organ vasculitis (SOV)
Cutaneous leukocytoclastic angiitis Cutaneous arteritis Primary central nervous system vasculitis Isolated aortitis Others
Vasculitis associated with systemic disease
Lupus vasculitis Rheumatoid vasculitis Sarcoid vasculitis Others
Vasculitis associated with probable aetiology
Hepatitis C virus-associated cryoglobulinemic vasculitis Hepatitis B virus-associated vasculitis Syphilis-associated aortitis Drug-associated immune complex vasculitis Drug-associated ANCA-associated vasculitis Cancer-associated vasculitis Others
16 Pathophysiology andPrinciples ofManagement ofVasculitis andFibromuscular…
https://t.me/medicina_free
365
16.3 Large Vessel Vasculitis
16.3.1 Giant Cell Arteritis (Temporal Arteritis)
Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is a granulomatous vasculitis principally involving medium- and large-calibre branches of the aorta, which left untreated, can lead to permanent blindness. It is the commonest form of vasculitis, occurring in patients over the age of 50, and mainly affects people of northern European and Scandinavian descent. There is a female preponderance and a worldwide incidence between 1 and 30 per 100,000. The strongest genetic association is with human leucocyte antigen class II gene loci DRB104, DQA103 and DQB103 [2].
GCA is a T cell driven disease characterised by the formation of vessel wall gran­ulomas, intimal hyperplasia and end-organ ischaemia. T helper cell 1 (Th1) and Th17 pathways and innate immunity appear to be central in its pathogenesis. Activation and maturation of immature vascular dendritic cells (vasDCs) within the normally immunoprivileged arterial wall leads to recruitment and activation of local innate immune cells such as monocytes and broblasts, as well as naive CD4 T cells. Adventitial vasa vasora critically control vessel wall access and drive differentiation of tissue-invasive T cells, which establish tissue residency within autonomous inammatory lesions [3]. Antigens have been suspected to drive the local activation of vasculitogenic CD4 T cells, but recent data suggest a more generalized defect in their threshold setting. In health, immune checkpoints provide a physiological brake on T cell activation to curb inammation-associated tissue destruction. This mecha­nism has been shown to be disrupted in GCA, as vasDCs fail to express the immuno­inhibitory programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1), leaving lesional T cells unchecked. Consequently, programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1)-positive CD4 T cells can enter the vessel wall, where they produce a broad spectrum of inammatory cytokines including interferon-gamma (IFN-γ), interleukin-17 (IL-17) and IL-21, and have a direct role in driving intimal hyperplasia and intramural neoangiogenesis. The deciency of the PD-1 immune checkpoint in GCA, promoting unopposed T cell immunity, contrasts with checkpoint hyperactivity in cancer patients in whom excessive PD-L1 expression paralyses the function of antitumor T cells [
Diverse macrophage subsets, secreting matrix metalloproteinases which degrade the internal elastic lamina, and smooth muscle cells within the media, promote the migration and proliferation of myobroblasts into and within the intima, ultimately inducing wall capillarisation and intimal hyperplasia, leading to luminal compro­mise [3]. Macrophages release IL-6 and IL-1β, potent cytokines required for dif­ferentiation of Th17 effector cells; levels of circulating IL-6 correlate with the severity of the acute inammatory response in GCA, and uctuate in line with dis­ease activity. Th1 cells differentiate in the presence of IL-12, thought to be produced by activated vasDCs, and these effector T cells are responsible for the secretion of IFN-γ, a potent activator of macrophages and heavily implicated in promoting
4].
366
https://t.me/medicina_free
M. Rischmueller et al.
mural inltration, as well as giant cell and granuloma formation. In contrast to IL-6 and IL-17, which appear to wax and wane with disease activity and are highly responsive to glucocorticoids, elevated levels of IL-12 and IFN-γ persist within the serum of patients and within temporal artery samples despite months of glucocorti­coid treatment, and higher levels of these cytokines correlate with ischaemic complications.
16.3.1.1 Biphasic Inammatory Response inGCA
It has been proposed that there is a biphasic inammatory process, where the Th17 (IL-6/IL-17)-mediated pathway, which is glucocorticoid-responsive, drives sys­temic inammation in early GCA, while Th1 (IL-12/IFN-γ)-mediated mechanisms promote chronicity and are poorly steroid responsive. This might explain the dis­connect between early control of systemic inammation and suboptimal numbers of patients achieving long-term remission, with late development of aortic aneurysms [2]. A recent study of patients who had serial temporal artery biopsies (TAB) before and 3–12months after initiation of therapy revealed that vascular inammation per­sisted in most patients, despite normalisation of CRP and ESR [3].
GCA may occur de novo, or in patients with known polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR), a related inammatory condition characterised by pain and stiffness of the shoulder and hip girdles. The most common presenting features of GCA are of occlusive cranial arteritis, such as temporal headache, jaw claudication, facial pain, amaurosis fugax, diplopia, cerebrovascular accident (particularly of the vertebral circulation) and unheralded unilateral or bilateral blindness, which occurs in up to 20% of patients. Limb claudication due to large vessel vasculitis in the absence of cranial arteritis may be the presenting feature of GCA, and some patients present with generalised lethargy, malaise, unexplained weight loss, or pyrexia of unknown origin. Physical signs may be minimal, but include scalp tenderness, nodularity/ decreased pulsation of the temporal artery, and in patients with visual symptoms, fundoscopic changes of anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy, retinal arterial occlu­sions or choroidal infarction. Presenting features with the highest positive predictive value for GCA include jaw claudication and/or scalp tenderness [
2]. Depending on
disease duration, normocytic anaemia, thrombocytosis and/or leukocytosis may be evident, and signicant elevation of the ESR and/or CRP is characteristic, although occasionally absent. The American College of Rheumatology classication criteria for GCA are shown in Table16.2 [5].
GCA is considered a medical emergency because of the high risk of irreversible blindness or stroke if treatment is delayed. In patients sustaining monocular blind­ness, there is a 50% risk of visual loss in the contralateral eye within 2weeks.
Histopathology of a temporal artery biopsy (TAB) is the gold standard for diag­nosis, but treatment should not be delayed, as pre-TAB glucocorticoid exposure does not affect the yield for up to 6weeks and beyond [6]. The sensitivity of TAB for the diagnosis of GCA varies between 39 and 91% because of skip lesions, and