Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_1033_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
24 Мб
Скачать
36
https://t.me/medicina_free
R. Lamm and F. Palazzo
Further Reading
Kristo I, et al. Modern esophageal function testing and gastroesophageal
reux disease in morbidly obese patients. Obes Surg. 2019;29(11):3536–
41.
Nam SY. Obesity-related digestive diseases and their pathophysiology. Gut
Liver. 2017;11(3):323–34.
Tack J, Pandolno JE.Pathophysiology of gastroesophageal reux disease.
Gastroenterology. 2018;154(2):277–88.
Valezi AC, et al. Gastroesophageal reux disease in obese patients. J
Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018;28(8):949–52.
Xing J, Chen JD.Alterations of gastrointestinal motility in obesity. Obes Res.
2004;12(11):1723–32.
Part II
https://t.me/medicina_free
Diagnostic Testing: Diagnostic
Imaging
Esophagram
https://t.me/medicina_free
ElisaJ.Furay, StephanieDoggett, andFrancisP.Buckley III
Introduction
Diagnostic investigation of esophageal disorders commonly uti­lizes pH studies, endoscopy, and high-resolution manometry. The barium esophagram is another important diagnostic tool that tends to be underutilized and misused by surgeons and gastroenterolo­gists. An esophagram combines both static and dynamic imaging techniques to allow for the evaluation of both structural and func­tional abnormalities within the esophagus and stomach. With spe­cialized protocols, trained clinicians are able to gather important data on esophageal anatomy and even esophageal motility with the correct protocol. This study has the benet of being noninva­sive, inexpensive, and readily available, and it does not require sedation.
In order for this study to have the greatest utility, the radiologist performing it should be trained on standard techniques and proto­cols, as well as familiar with the imaging ndings of varying esoph­ageal diseases. An esophagram combines both single- and
4
E. J. Furay (*) · S. Doggett · F. P. BuckleyIII Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA
© Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) 2023 A. D. Patel et al. (eds.), The SAGES Manual of Physiologic Evaluation of Foregut Diseases,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-39199-6_4
39
40
https://t.me/medicina_free
double-contrast techniques to give the most comprehensive evalua­tion of the esophagus. The single-contrast load aids in the dilation of the esophagus and reveals structural abnormalities including masses, strictures, and diverticula. The double-contrast technique utilizes an effervescent agent after ingesting barium, which allows radiologists to see subtle irregularities in esophageal mucosa and improves the diagnostic yield of the study [13]. The study also utilizes both single-frame X-rays and uoroscopy. Fluoroscopy is the more dynamic portion of the study and allows for the evaluation of esophageal motility by taking continuous X-ray images, while the patient performs multiple swallows using different contrast loads with varying consistencies [4]. The most commonly used contrast medium is barium sulfate as it provides improved mucosal detail compared with water-soluble contrasts [5]. There are certain situations in which you would want to evaluate the esophagus with a water-soluble contrast medium and those are discussed later.
E. J. Furay et al.
How toPerform anEsophagram andVariations inTechnique
An esophagram is a multiphasic study, which generally starts with a single-contrast bolus followed by a spot lm captured in the upright position 1min following barium ingestion. This assesses the empty­ing of the esophagus into the stomach. If the barium has not emptied from the esophagus after 1 minute, then subsequent 2- and 5-min lms are taken and compared with the 1-min lm. A normal esopha­gus should empty approximately 250 mL of low- density barium within seconds [6]. If there is signicant liquid dysphagia, then the study should conclude the study to prevent patient aspiration. If there is no signicant liquid dysphagia, then the radiologist should proceed with the upright double-contrast (also known as air contrast) phase of the study. In this portion, the patient is given an effervescent medium allowing air to ll the lumen of the esophagus and enhance the visu­alization of the mucosa, which has been coated with barium. This technique improves the sensitivity for detecting subtle mucosal irreg­ularities [7, 8]. This is then followed by the motility portion of the study, where the patient is placed in a semi-prone position and asked to swallow barium. The radiologist images multiple swallows using
4 Esophagram
https://t.me/medicina_free
41
uoroscopy and focuses on the end of the barium column to evaluate bolus transit through the esophagus. Previous studies have compared esophageal motility ndings on barium esophagram to manometric ndings and have shown concordance between a normal manometry and ve normal swallows on a properly performed barium esopha­gram [9, 10]. The next step of the esophagram is a distended esopha­geal phase, in which the patient drinks a larger bolus of barium in order to distend the esophagus and identify any subtle narrowing along the esophagus. This is again performed in a semi-prone posi­tion and is typically evaluated by using uoroscopy. The patient is then positioned supine and upright until the barium has cleared the esophagus. In order to completely clear the barium from the esopha­gus, the patient may need to take a few swallows of water. The patient is then again placed horizontally and the esophagus is evaluated with uoroscopy. If barium is seen in the distal esophagus, then a reux episode can be inferred. If no barium is seen, some centers perform provocative maneuvers to try and elicit a reux event [6]. Performing these maneuvers increases the sensitivity of identifying clinically sig­nicant reux [11]. Following evaluation for reux, the solid food phase of the esophagram begins. The patient ingests a barium tablet, and its movement through the esophagus and into the stomach is evaluated. Stomach emptying is also commonly observed at this time, although much of this interpretation is subjective and should be evaluated formally with a gastric emptying study if specic pathol­ogy is suspected.
There have been several slight modications to the solid food phase of the esophagram to improve the evaluation of esophageal function. Using alternatives to the barium tablet, such as marsh­mallow or hamburger-impregnated mediums, has been shown to better assess esophageal motility and bolus transport abnormali­ties [12]. The addition of an alternative solid bolus more accu­rately assesses esophageal motility because the contraction amplitude of the esophagus is highly dependent on the size and consistency of the bolus [13]. About 14% of patients who demon­strate abnormal transit of liquids will show normal transit of a solid bolus, supporting the need for more viscous mediums in the evaluation of esophageal function [14]. This modication to the classic esophagram has been adopted at many large institutions to better establish esophageal function during the routine workup of
42
https://t.me/medicina_free
foregut disorders, particularly in the evaluation of motility in patients undergoing antireux surgery.
D’Alessio et al. evaluated patients with esophageal dysmotility demonstrated on manometry who in addition had either GERD and/ or symptomatic hiatal hernias. Their group evaluated these patients with specialized esophagography to determine their ability to clear food boluses of different consistencies. This technique observes esophageal peristalsis and emptying in both the prone horizontal and prone slight Trendelenburg position. Patients consumed a single large bolus swallow of barium and were subsequently examined for unin­terrupted progression of the contraction wave and complete emptying of the esophagus with two or fewer stripping waves. Each patient was then challenged with a food bolus using a marshmallow followed by a bite of bagel food bolus. Again, normal clearance was dened as the passage of the food bolus with two or fewer stripping motions. In this study, patients with ndings of esophageal dysmotility on manome­try but normal esophageal clearance on food boluses on esophagog­raphy underwent laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. These patients’ outcomes were then compared to patients with normal esophageal motility in manometry who underwent laparoscopic Nissen fundopli­cation. They found that these two groups had functionally similar outcomes, which suggests that preoperative solid challenge esopha­grams can be utilized as a predictor of positive postoperative out­comes in antireux surgery patients [15].
E. J. Furay et al.
Diagnostic Implications
GERD
An esophagram is an excellent initial test for patients with a wide variety of esophageal complaints. As the name implies, gastro­esophageal reux disease (GERD) results from the retrograde reux of caustic gastric juices into the esophagus. These reux events are able to be captured on an esophagram, and radiologists commonly report gastroesophageal reux as ndings on an esophagram. Serna-Gallegos et al. looked at patients found to have reux on the esophagram and investigated if they had objec­tive evidence of reux on pH study. They showed a very poor
4 Esophagram
https://t.me/medicina_free
correlation between reux reported on the esophagram and objec­tive evidence of acid reux on pH studies [16]. It is important to remember that the diagnosis of GERD must be made using objec­tive evidence of acid reux in the form of positive pH study or signicant endoscopy ndings.
43
Mucosal Irregularities
Patients with chronic reux can develop reux esophagitis, which is irritation of the esophageal mucosa from caustic juices of the stomach leading to mucosal edema and inammation. This can be identied best on the double-contrast phase of the barium esopha­gram because of the ne mucosal detail provided. Figure4.1 dem­onstrates the grainy appearance of the proximal esophagus seen on an esophagram secondary to edema and inammation [17].
Peptic strictures are caused by chronic reux and are most commonly located in the distal esophagus and often above a hia­tal hernia. On an esophagram, strictures are best seen during the esophageal distention portion of the study. Ott etal. were able to show that the addition of the esophageal distention phase to the esophagram improved the accuracy of detecting peptic strictures to a nearly 95% sensitivity rate [18]. Some studies suggest that, when performed properly, esophagrams can be as effective as endoscopy for diagnosing peptic strictures or rings [18] (Fig.4.2).
Barrett’s esophagus is a condition in which cells of the distal esophagus undergo metaplastic changes from stratied squamous epithelium to simple columnar epithelium-containing goblet cells. These metaplastic changes increase patients’ risk of undergoing dysplastic changes and ultimately developing esophageal adeno­carcinoma. The diagnosis of Barrett’s esophagus is based on a tissue sampling obtained during endoscopy, but esophagography may be able to identify patients at higher risk for Barrett’s esoph­agus. Gilchrist etal. were able to demonstrate that patients with a high esophageal stricture, ulcer, or reticular mucosal pattern had a 90% chance of having Barrett’s mucosa at endoscopy [19]. Although we do not advocate for this as a screening method for intestinal metaplasia, we do recognize that some esophagram
44
https://t.me/medicina_free
E. J. Furay et al.
Fig. 4.1 Esophagitis. The red arrow demonstrates the grainy appearance of esophagitis on an esophagram
ndings may be suggestive of Barrett’s esophagus and may war­rant endoscopic evaluation.
Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a relatively new diagnosis in esophageal pathology. It is characterized by symptoms similar to GERD in association with mucosal biopsy demonstrating 15 eosinophils/HPF in one or more biopsy specimens, absence of pathologic GERD on pH study, and lack of response to high dose PPI therapy [20]. Like Barrett’s esophagus, a diagnosis of EoE is
4 Esophagram
https://t.me/medicina_free
45
Fig. 4.2 Stricture. Seen here as an abrupt narrowing in the distal esophagus
heavily reliant on tissue sample, but there are some features on an esophagram, which can suggest the presence of EoE. Radiologic features of EoE include the presence of xed rings, sometimes
46
https://t.me/medicina_free
E. J. Furay et al.
Fig. 4.3 Eosinophilic esophagitis. You can see the “stack of coins” appear­ance shown in the red bracket
described as a “stack of coins” (Fig.4.3), either diffusely through­out the esophagus or at xed segments and strictures [21]. These ndings should be further investigated with endoscopy and biop­sies.