Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_1033_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
24 Мб
Скачать
266
https://t.me/medicina_free
15. Aggarwal N, Thota PN, Lopez R, et al. A randomized double-blind placebo- controlled crossover-style trial of buspirone in functional dysphagia and ineffective esophageal motility. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2018;30:13213.
16. Monrroy H, Cisternas D, Bilder C, etal. The Chicago classication 3.0 results in more normal ndings and fewer hypotensive ndings with no difference in other diagnoses. Am J Gastroenterol. 2017;112(4):606–12.
17. Roman S, Lin Z, Kwiatek MA, etal. Weak peristalsis in esophageal pres­sure topography: classication and association with dysphagia. Am J Gastroenterol. 2011;106:349–56.
18. Clouse RE, Staiano A.Topography of normal and high-amplitude esoph­ageal peristalsis. Am J Phys. 1993;265:G1098–107.
19. Ghosh SK, Pandolno JE, Kwiatek MA, Kahrilas PJ.Oesophageal peri­staltic transition zone defects: real but few and far between. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2008;20:1283–90.
20. Kumar N, Porter RF, Chanin JM, Gyawali CP.Analysis of intersegmental trough and proximal latency of smooth muscle contraction using high­resolution esophageal manometry. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2012;46:375–81.
21. Wang D, Wang X, Yao Y, Xiaowen X, Wang J, Jia Y, Hong X.Assessment of esophageal motor disorders using high-resolution manometry in esophageal dysphagia with Normal endoscopy. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2019;25(1):61–7.
22. Savarino E, Gemignani L, Pohl D, etal. Oesophageal motility and bolus transit abnormalities increase in parallel with the severity of gastro­oesophageal reux disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2011;34:476–86.
23. Bazin C, Benezech A, Alessandrini M, etal. Esophageal motor disorders are a strong and independent associated factor of Barrett’s esophagus. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2018;24:216–25.
24. Rogers BD, Rengarajan A, Mauro A, etal. Fragmented and failed swal­lows on esophageal high-resolution manometry associate with abnormal reux burden better than weak swallows. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2020;32:e13736.
25. Nikolic M, Schwameis K, Kristo I, etal. Ineffective esophageal motility in patients with GERD is no contraindication for Nissen fundoplication. World J Surg. 2020;44:186–93.
26. Bakhos CT, Petrov RV, Parkman HP, Malik Z, Abbas AE.Role and safety of fundoplication in esophageal disease and dysmotility syndromes. J Thorac Dis. 2019;11(Suppl 12):S1610–7.
27. Zerbib F, Roman S.Current therapeutic options for esophageal motor dis­orders as dened by the Chicago classication. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2015;49(6):451–60.
28. Shaker A, Stoikes N, Drapekin J, etal. Multiple rapid swallow responses during esophageal high-resolution manometry reect esophageal body peristaltic reserve. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013;108:1706–12.
29. Min YW, Shin I, et al. Multiple rapid swallow maneuver enhances the clinical utility of high-resolution manometry in patients showing ineffec­tive esophageal motility. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015;94(40):e1669.
A. Banks-Venegoni et al.
Distal Esophageal Spasm
https://t.me/medicina_free
19
SarahSamreen andDmitryOleynikov
Introduction
Distal esophageal spasm (DES) is an idiopathic disorder and is the most frequently studied esophageal motility disorder aside from achalasia. It used to be commonly known as diffuse esopha­geal spasm, but in 2003, Sperandio etal. [1] concluded that due to the limited nature of the disorder, diffuse esophageal spasm is a misnomer and the name “distal” esophageal spasm is more appro­priate. The Chicago classication of esophageal motility disor­ders has since adopted the new name. Due to the rarity of this disorder, the true prevalence in the general population is unknown; however, prevalence is 3–9% in symptomatic patients [2]. The disorder is most often seen in women and most commonly diag-
S. Samreen University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA e-mail: sasamree@utmb.edu
D. Oleynikov (*) Department of Surgery, Monmouth Medical Center, Long Branch, NJ, USA e-mail: dmitry.oleynikov@rwjbh.org
© Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) 2023 A. D. Patel et al. (eds.), The SAGES Manual of Physiologic Evaluation of Foregut Diseases,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-39199-6_19
267
268
https://t.me/medicina_free
nosed in the 60s to early 70s age range [3, 4]. This may also be secondary to delay in diagnosis due to a lack of physician and public awareness.
Even though the complete neuromuscular physiology is unclear, it is thought to be caused by an impaired neurologic inhibitory pathway due to muscular hypertrophy and degenera­tion of the branches of the vagus nerve. This allows for premature, repetitive, and simultaneous esophageal smooth muscle contrac­tions [5] most notably in the lower two-thirds of the esophagus. Another suggested pathway is the impairment of inhibitory inner­vation secondary to deciency of tissue nitric oxide (NO) [6] once again leading to simultaneous contractions and possibly abnormal relaxation of the esophagogastric junction. This is supported by the fact that healthy subjects administered NO scavenger demon­strate simultaneous contractions in the distal esophagus, which is reversed by the replacement of NO [7]. Since achalasia has a sim­ilar pathophysiologic mechanism, some authors have suggested that even though uncommon DES may progress to or overlap with achalasia [811]. Some studies employing intraluminal ultra­sound or computed tomography (CT) have demonstrated thicker lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and esophageal smooth muscle layer in patients with DES [12, 13]. It is unclear if these ndings are the primary cause or secondary to chronically increased neu­ronal stimulation.
S. Samreen and D. Oleynikov
Symptoms andDiagnosis
DES can present with various esophageal symptoms that range widely in severity and frequency. Tutuian etal. [4] demonstrated the most common symptoms by analyzing 71 patients with a manometric diagnosis of DES.They found dysphagia to be the most common symptom (32%), followed by chest pain (22%), typical GERD symptoms (20%), and atypical GERD symptoms (13%). When correlated with manometry, dysphagia may be asso­ciated with impaired bolus transit, whereas chest pain may be associated with strong esophageal contraction amplitudes.
19 Distal Esophageal Spasm
https://t.me/medicina_free
269
However, patients rarely present with a single symptom and most commonly have a combination of several symptoms. Thirty per­cent of the patients may have some weight loss [3] due to modi­cation of dietary habits.
Symptoms are often triggered by ingestion of solids or uids, emotional stress, or even exertion. Chest pain can radiate to the back, jaw, bilateral chest, and shoulders and thus can be confused with cardiac angina. Hence, it is prudent to prioritize cardiac investigation and rule out more-prevalent and life-threatening car­diovascular disease as the cause of chest pain, before attributing symptoms to less dangerous and rare disorder like DES [14].
The workup of DES consists of upper endoscopy, pH monitor­ing, esophageal manometry, and esophagography. Esophageal manometry is considered the gold standard, especially since the introduction of high-resolution manometry (HRM). It is impor­tant to remember that due to the intermittent nature of DES, spasm-attributed motility may not always be observed during esophageal manometry. Hence, a negative study does not always rule out the diagnosis of DES.
According to the Chicago classication v4.0, a conclusive manometric diagnosis of DES is dened by premature contrac­tions in more than 20% of swallows, coupled with a normal lower esophageal sphincter pressure [15]. Premature contractions are indicated on manometry as low distal latency (DL) of <4.5sec­onds, in the setting of a DCI greater than 450 mmHg.s.cm. DL is dened as the time between the swallow- induced upper esopha­geal sphincter relaxation and the contractile deceleration point (CDP) in the distal esophagus where propagation velocity slows down [16].
Barium esophagram may demonstrate a “corkscrew” or “rosary bead” pattern of simultaneous contractions, sometimes also referred to as pseudodiverticulosis. This is caused by tertiary con­tractions indicating advanced disease. However, these ndings are neither specic nor sensitive and are not necessary for diagnosis.
Upper endoscopy performed at the initial evaluation allows the exclusion of mechanical obstruction, esophageal stenosis, or esophagitis [6]. Twenty-four- or 48-h pH monitoring should be
270
https://t.me/medicina_free
considered in patients having regurgitation or heartburn to exclude GERD.
S. Samreen and D. Oleynikov
Treatment
There is no standardized treatment algorithm for DES.This is due to the rarity of the diagnosis and a lack of clinical trials as well as a lack of understanding of the underlying pathology of the dis­ease. Symptom control is the main focus of treatment. The rst step is to eliminate trigger foods or drinks from the diet. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and histamine receptor blockers are used for patient’s complaining of GERD, which has the potential to induce spasm. Peppermint oil has smooth muscle relaxing proper­ties and has emerged as a potential treatment for patients with dysphagia and non-cardiac chest pain [17, 18].
Smooth muscle relaxants may be effective in providing symp­tomatic relief in some cases. Nitrates cause smooth muscle relax­ation through an increase in tissue NO. While not tested in a controlled fashion, nitrates have shown manometrically to pro­long the DL without an effect on the distal contraction amplitude [7]. Phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors work by blocking the break­down of NO controlled by cyclic guanosine monophosphate, leading to the reduction in the esophageal contractile amplitude [19]. However, the high cost and lack of insurance coverage are a barrier to the use of phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors. Calcium channel blockers are another drug therapy used in the manage­ment of DES, but the use is limited by side effects. Since visceral hypersensitivity can be a major driver of symptoms, tricyclic anti­depressants are effective at relieving chest pain in patients with esophageal motility disorders [2022].
Botox injection is currently the best-studied treatment in patients with DES [23]. Botulinum toxin causes muscle relaxation by inhibiting the release of acetylcholine from cholinergic neu­rons at the neuromuscular junction. Vanuytsel et al. [24] per-
19 Distal Esophageal Spasm
https://t.me/medicina_free
271
formed a prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial comparing Botox injection vs. saline in patients with DES and nutcracker esophagus. They gave botulinum toxin into the esoph­ageal body above the esophagogastric junction and demonstrated reduced symptoms, as well as stabilized unintentional weight loss in those treated with botulinum toxin. Even though botox injec­tions appear effective, the effect is temporary and there is concern over complications. However, complications occur at a low rate of
7.9% and seem to be mild consisting mainly of chest pain, heart­burn, and epigastric pain, except for one patient that had a fatal case of mediastinitis after botox injection [25].
Esophageal dilation has a limited role in the management of DES.Pneumatic dilation has been reported to have some success, but it is unclear if the patients could have been more properly categorized as spastic achalasia [26]. Also, pneumatic dilation has a risk for esophageal perforation.
Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has emerged and shown promise in the treatment of DES. It is especially effective for achieving a long myotomy that is essential to prevent any spastic remnants. However, the procedure can be technically challenging due to hyperactive spastic contractions during the procedure [27]. Studies also seem to suggest that the success rates for POEM are higher in classic achalasia than in patients with DES [28, 29]. Considering that patients with DES are usually older than patients with achalasia, the fact that POEM is minimally invasive appears attractive. The risks associated with POEM procedure include bleeding, mucosal tears, pneumothorax, pneumo-peritoneum, and worsening GERD [2]. Still, the results are favorable and contin­ued research is needed.
Heller myotomy is a well-established treatment for achalasia. However, its role in the management of DES is debatable at best. Leconte etal. [30] performed long myotomy and anterior fundo­plication on 20 patients with a diagnosis of DES. Dysphagia and chest pain were signicantly improved in 18 and 20 patients, respectively, after 50 months of median follow-up. All of these procedures were performed via laparotomy. With the current advancement in minimally invasive procedures performed via either laparoscopy or robotically, newer studies, especially con-
272
https://t.me/medicina_free
S. Samreen and D. Oleynikov
trolled trials, are necessary to determine if surgical management is superior to endoscopic or medical treatment of DES.
Conclusion
In conclusion, accurate diagnosis of this condition is the most important rst step. Once this is completed, then an escalation of management should be started with medical management as the rst step. This is followed by endoscopic management using Botox and dilation, and then progression to myotomy, either endoscopic or laparoscopic if the patient is a good candidate. Because of the chronic nature of DES, these patients require pro­longed follow-up in a partnership with gastroenterology and sur­gery is key in the ultimate symptomatic management of these patients.
References
1. Sperandio M, Tutuian R, Gideon RM, Katz PO, Castell DO. Diffuse esophageal spasm: not diffuse but distal esophageal spasm (DES). Dig Dis Sci. 2003;48(7):1380–4. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1024131814888.
2. Khalaf M, Chowdhary S, Elias PS, Castell D.Distal esophageal spasm: a review. Am J Med. 2018;131(9):1034–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
amjmed.2018.02.031.
3. Almansa C, Heckman MG, DeVault KR, Bouras E, Achem SR.Esophageal spasm: demographic, clinical, radiographic, and manometric features in 108 patients. Dis Esophagus. 2012;25(3):214–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/
j.1442- 2050.2011.01258.x.
4. Tutuian R, Mainie I, Agrawal A, Gideon RM, Katz PO, Castell DO. Symptom and function heterogenicity among patients with distal esophageal spasm: studies using combined impedance-manometry. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101(3):464–9. https://doi.
org/10.1111/j.1572- 0241.2006.00408.x.
5. Roman S, Kahrilas PJ.Distal esophageal spasm. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2015;31(4):328–33. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOG.0000000000000187.
6. Roman S, Kahrilas PJ.Management of spastic disorders of the esopha­gus. Gastroenterol Clin N Am. 2013;42(1):27–43. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.gtc.2012.11.002.
19 Distal Esophageal Spasm
https://t.me/medicina_free
7. Konturek JW, Gillessen A, Domschke W.Diffuse esophageal spasm: a malfunction that involves nitric oxide? Scand J Gastroenterol. 1995;30(11):1041–5. https://doi.org/10.3109/00365529509101604.
8. Longstreth GF, Foroozan P.Evolution of symptomatic diffuse esophageal spasm to achalasia. South Med J. 1982;75(2):217–20. https://doi.
org/10.1097/00007611- 198202000- 00023.
9. Robson K, Rosenberg S, Lembo T.GERD progressing to diffuse esopha­geal spasm and then to achalasia. Dig Dis Sci. 2000;45(1):110–3. https://
doi.org/10.1023/a:1005469629067.
10. Khatami SS, Khandwala F, Shay SS, Vaezi MF.Does diffuse esophageal spasm progress to achalasia? A prospective cohort study. Dig Dis Sci. 2005;50(9):1605–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620- 005- 2903- 3.
11. Fontes LH, Herbella FA, Rodriguez TN, Trivino T, Farah JF.Progression of diffuse esophageal spasm to achalasia: incidence and predictive fac­tors. Dis Esophagus. 2013;26(5):470–4. https://doi.
org/10.1111/j.1442- 2050.2012.01377.x.
12. Goldberg MF, Levine MS, Torigian DA.Diffuse esophageal spasm: CT ndings in seven patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;191(3):758–63.
https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.07.3747.
13. Mittal RK, Kassab G, Puckett JL, Liu J.Hypertrophy of the muscularis propria of the lower esophageal sphincter and the body of the esophagus in patients with primary motility disorders of the esophagus. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98(8):1705–12. https://doi.
org/10.1111/j.1572- 0241.2003.07587.x.
14. Goldin A, Lo WK. Approach to esophageal motility disorders. In: Oleynikov D, Fisichella P, editors. A mastery approach to complex esoph­ageal diseases. Cham: Springer; 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/978- 3-
319- 75795- 7_5.
15. Yadlapati R, Kahrilas PJ, Fox MR, et al. Esophageal motility disorders on high-resolution manometry: Chicago classication version 4.0©. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2021;33(1):e14058. https://doi.org/10.1111/
nmo.14058.
16. Pandolno JE, Roman S, Carlson D, etal. Distal esophageal spasm in high-resolution esophageal pressure topography: dening clinical pheno­types. Gastroenterology. 2011;141(2):469–75. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.
gastro.2011.04.058.
17. Khalaf MHG, Chowdhary S, Elmunzer BJ, Elias PS, Castell D.Impact of peppermint therapy on dysphagia and non-cardiac chest pain: a pilot study. Dig Dis Sci. 2019;64(8):2214–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-
019- 05523- 8.
18. Parvataneni S, Vemuri-Reddy S.Role of peppermint oil in diffuse esoph­ageal spasm in the geriatric population. Cureus. 2020;12(3):e7192.
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.7192. Published 6 Mar 2020.
19. Eherer AJ, Schwetz I, Hammer HF, etal. Effect of sildenal on oesopha­geal motor function in healthy subjects and patients with oesophageal
273
274
https://t.me/medicina_free
motor disorders. Gut. 2002;50(6):758–64. https://doi.org/10.1136/
gut.50.6.758.
20. Clouse RE, Lustman PJ, Eckert TC, Ferney DM, Grifth LS.Low-dose trazodone for symptomatic patients with esophageal contraction abnor­malities. A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Gastroenterology. 1987;92(4):1027–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016- 5085(87)90979- 6.
21. Cannon RO 3rd, Quyyumi AA, Mincemoyer R, et al. Imipramine in patients with chest pain despite normal coronary angiograms. N Engl J Med. 1994;330(20):1411–7. https://doi.org/10.1056/
NEJM199405193302003.
22. Hershcovici T, Achem SR, Jha LK, Fass R.Systematic review: the treat­ment of noncardiac chest pain. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2012;35(1):5–
14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365- 2036.2011.04904.x.
23. Bashashati M, Andrews C, Ghosh S, Storr M.Botulinum toxin in the treatment of diffuse esophageal spasm. Dis Esophagus. 2010;23(7):554–
60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442- 2050.2010.01065.x.
24. Vanuytsel T, Bisschops R, Farré R, etal. Botulinum toxin reduces dys­phagia in patients with nonachalasia primary esophageal motility disor­ders. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;11(9):1115–1121.e2. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.cgh.2013.03.021.
25. van Hoeij FB, Tack JF, Pandolno JE, etal. Complications of botulinum toxin injections for treatment of esophageal motility disorders†. Dis Esophagus. 2017;30(3):1–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/dote.12491.
26. Irving JD, Owen WJ, Linsell J, McCullagh M, Keightley A, Anggiansah A. Management of diffuse esophageal spasm with balloon dilatation. Gastrointest Radiol. 1992;17(3):189–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/
BF01888544.
27. Ponds FA, Smout AJPM, Fockens P, Bredenoord AJ.Challenges of per­oral endoscopic myotomy in the treatment of distal esophageal spasm. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2018;53(3):252–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/00365
521.2018.1424933.
28. Sharata AM, Dunst CM, Pescarus R, etal. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for esophageal primary motility disorders: analysis of 100 con­secutive patients. J Gastrointest Surg. 2015;19(1):161–70. https://doi.
org/10.1007/s11605- 014- 2610- 5.
29. Khan MA, Kumbhari V, Ngamruengphong S, etal. Is POEM the answer for management of spastic esophageal disorders? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig Dis Sci. 2017;62(1):35–44. https://doi.
org/10.1007/s10620- 016- 4373- 1.
30. Leconte M, Douard R, Gaudric M, Dumontier I, Chaussade S, Dousset B. Functional results after extended myotomy for diffuse oesophageal spasm. Br J Surg. 2007;94(9):1113–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.5761.
S. Samreen and D. Oleynikov
Jackhammer Esophagus
https://t.me/medicina_free
20
StuartA.Abel andJosephR.Broucek
Introduction
Jackhammer esophagus (JE) is a relatively new diagnosis that has been distinguished from nutcracker esophagus and diffuse esoph­ageal spasm (DES). JE was rst described in 2012 when esopha­geal hypercontractility without multipeaked contractions was noted in association with esophagogastric junction outow obstruction [1]. The denition of JE was dened more specically by the Chicago Classication published in 2015 [2].
S. A. Abel (*) Division of Upper GI and General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Keck Medical Center of USC, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA e-mail: Stuart.Abel@med.usc.edu
J. R. Broucek Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA e-mail: Joseph.Broucek@vumc.org
© Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) 2023 A. D. Patel et al. (eds.), The SAGES Manual of Physiologic Evaluation of Foregut Diseases,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-39199-6_20
275