Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_4547_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
25 Мб
Скачать
374 A. Ba-Ssalamah et al.
https://t.me/med1917
Fig. 3 Hydro-MDCT of the oesophagus in axial (a) and
coronal (b) reformations shows a circumferential wall thicken­ing 10 mm in depth in the middle third of the oesophagus, with
Fig. 4 Hydro-MDCT of the oesophagus in axial (a), coronal
(b), and sagittal (c) reformations shows a markedly diffuse oesophageal wall thickening 18 mm in depth in the distal third
2005), N staging depends on the presence of positive
locoregional or perioesophageal lymph nodes (affec­ted lymph nodes) (Fig. 8). The N staging is explained according to the 7th edition (AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 7th edition) as following:
N0 no regional lymph node metastasis.
N1 1–2 positive regional lymph nodes.
N2 3–6 positive regional lymph nodes.
N3 C 7 positive regional lymph nodes.
homogeneous enhancement and smooth outer borders in terms of the T2 tumour (arrows)
of the oesophagus, with inhomogeneous enhancement and blurred outer borders in terms of the T3 tumour (arrows)
Lymph node assessment for metastatic spread remains a challenge, even with PET/MDCT. How­ever, improved evaluation appears possible if both morphology including size and shape, contrast enhancement pattern as well as tracer uptake of lymph nodes are used (Blom et al. 2011; Okada et al. 2009). On CT perioesophageal lymph nodes are considered positive if they are C6 mm in diameter, rounded in shape, and show marked or inhomogenous contrast
Cross-Sectional Imaging of the Oesophagus 375
https://t.me/med1917
Fig. 5 Hydro-MDCT of the oesophagus in axial (a), and
coronal (b), reformations shows a huge mass with inhomoge­neous enhancement in the mediastinum arising from the
Fig. 6 Hydro-MDCT of the oesophagus in coronal reforma-
tions showing examples of large cancer in the lower third of the oesophagus at the gastroesophageal junction, with AEG I (a),
oesophageal wall, with infiltration of the trachea (a, arrow), in terms of the T4 tumour, note the enlarged pathologic lymph node as stage N2 (a, arrowheads)
AEG II (b), and AEG III (c). The differentiation between distal oesophageal cancer and gastric cancer located in the cardia is difficult in some cases
enhancement (Ba-Ssalamah et al. 2003). In case of FDG-PET there is no established SUV cutoff for lymph node metastases, although single institutions have their own cutoffs (Yu et al. 2011; Kato et al.
2009). However, in general, lymph nodes are con-
sidered involved if they show an FDG uptake that is
higher than the background. A meta-analysis of 12 studies (n = 490) examined the diagnostic accuracy of FDG-PET in preoperative staging of oesophageal cancer and reported sensitivity and specificity for detecting locoregional lymph node involvement of 51 and 84 %, respectively (van Westreenen et al. 2004).
376 A. Ba-Ssalamah et al.
https://t.me/med1917
Fig. 7 FDG-PET/CT of a
patient with oesophageal cancer in axial and coronal reformations. The area of the untreated tumour shows intense FDG uptake (a, b, arrows). After treatment no FDG uptake is appreciated (c, d, arrows). Histopathological work-up after resection confirmed no viable tumour tissue
M Staging. Hematogenous metastases from oesoph­ageal carcinoma most commonly involve the liver because the oesophagus is drained by the portal vein (Fig. 8). Other less common sites of hematogenous spreadincludethelungs,adrenal glands, kidneys,bones, and brain. Lymph node involvement outside a perio­esophageal location is considered M1 disease (Nomura
et al. 2012). Advanced distal cancers can develop peritoneal metastases (Fig. 9).
FDG-PET is most helpful in distinguishing potentially resectable, locally advanced disease (T3-4, N0, M0) from distant disease (M1). In prospective studies M1 disease was detected by FDG-PET and missed by CT (with or without EUS) in 5–7 % of
Cross-Sectional Imaging of the Oesophagus 377
https://t.me/med1917
Fig. 8 FDG-PET/CT of a patient with distal oesophageal
b
cancer in axial and coronal reformations. There is an intense FDG uptake in the area of primary tumour as well as in the liver and left pubic bone indicating distant metastases (a, b, arrows)
cases (Meyers et al. 2007; Heeren et al. 2004). M1 disease was detected by FDG-PET and missed by CT in 6–15 % of patients (Flamen et al. 2000; Meyers et al. 2007; Heeren et al. 2004).
4.2 Follow-Up After Oesophagectomy
Tumour recurrence of oesophageal cancer can be divided into locoregional recurrence and distant metastatic disease. The rate of recurrence of oesoph­ageal cancer even after curative surgery was found to be high in most reports (AJCC 2009). In the detection of tumour recurrence, the selected imaging modalities are important in many regards. First of all, the imaging modality must be suitable and cost-effective, and able to detect the pathology in the early stages. After oesophagectomy and gastric excision, the anatomy of the posterior mediastinum is markedly changed. This makes assessment of possible local tumour recurrence difficult. Wall thickening or adja­cent mass and suspicious lymph nodes are highly predictive for recurrent disease (AJCC 2009). Hydro technique in combination with FDG-PET/MDCT is again the modality of choice in early detection of recurrent tumour (Guo et al. 2007).
4.2.1 CT Findings
Locoregional recurrent oesophageal tumour is well demonstrated by CT. A smooth or spiculated area of extrinsic mass effect on the mediastinal border can be visualised by CT. Furthermore, MDCT with multi­planar reformations is accurate in detecting masses after oesophageal surgery and superior for distant metastatic disease, and can accurately delineate the neoesophagus and its surroundings (Fig. 10). How­ever, differentiating between fibrosis and tumour tis­sue at CT is based on indirect signs and may be difficult or even impossible in some cases. FDG-PET/ MDCT can overcome this limitation (Sun et al. 2009; Carlisle et al. 1993; Tunaci 2002). Early postoperative cases with possible inflammatory reactions or early post-radiation changes, in particular, must be inter­preted with caution.
378 A. Ba-Ssalamah et al.
https://t.me/med1917
Fig. 9 Hydro-MDCT of the oesophagus in coronal reforma-
tions shows a distal oesophageal cancer (white arrow) with marked ascites (small black arrow), and diffuse stranding of the mesenteric root (black arrowhead) indicative of peritoneal carcinomatosis (large black arrow). Note the oesophageal stent (white arrowhead)
5 Other Oesophageal Malignancies
5.1 Oesophageal Lymphoma
The oesophagus is the alimentary organ least com­monly involved with lymphoma, therefore lymphoma of the oesophagus is rare. Any histologic variety of lymphoma may affect the oesophagus (Mendelson and Fermoyle 2005). To diagnose primary oesopha­geal lymphoma, the following criteria have been proposed: (a) predominantly oesophageal involve­ment with only regional lymph node involvement; (b) no definite enlargement of mediastinal lymph nodes; (c) no involvement of liver and spleen; and (d) no superficial lymphadenopathy (Kaplan 2004).
Fig. 10 Hydro-MDCT of the oesophagus in axial (a) and
coronal (b) reformations in a patient with a clinical history of oesophageal cancer and esophagectomy and gastric transposi­tion. We can detect a recurrence demonstrated as a solid mass with inhomogeneous enhancement at the anastomosis site (right side cervical, a, arrow). Note the stent dislocation (b, arrow)
5.1.1 CT and PET/CT Findings
CT may demonstrate a homogeneously enhancing mass with irregular borders or sharply delineated, pronounced, polypoid wall thickening in any part of the oesophagus (Fig. 11), with or without associated lymphadenopathy. Lymphoma may infiltrate the
Cross-Sectional Imaging of the Oesophagus 379
https://t.me/med1917
Fig. 11 Hydro-MDCT of the oesophagus in (a), coronal (b),
b
and sagittal (c) reformations in a patient with surgically proven lymphoma shows a large polypoid mass in the cervical oesophagus (arrows) without infiltration the oesophageal wall
entire oesophagus diffusely. While splenic involve­ment is suggestive of lymphoma, hepatic metastases are characteristic of oesophageal cancer. There is no specific CT finding for oesophageal lymphoma. PET/ CT scans can also be used in staging patients with primary oesophageal lymphoma, as well as for mon­itoring these tumours after therapy (Suga et al. 2009). However, the availability of FDG/PET and, in par­ticular, FDG-PET/CT, is still limited and expensive.
5.2 Leiomyoma and GIST
Leiomyoma accounts for 60–70 % of all benign oesophageal neoplasms and is the most common benign tumour of the oesophagus, while rare in the remaining gastrointestinal tract (Hatch et al. 2000; Seremetis and Lyons 1976; Simmang et al. 1989). The tumour is present more often in male patients (2:1) at a median age of 30–35 years. Usually, leio­myomas are between two and eight cm in diameter. They are multiple in less than 3 % of cases. More than half of the patients with oesophageal leiomyoma are asymptomatic. Typical complaints are either dysphagia or substernal chest pain due to obstruction of oesophageal bolus transit. Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) are the most common nonepithelial tumours of the gastrointestinal tract, although they are rare in the oesophagus (Monges et al. 2010).
5.2.1 CT Findings
Enhanced CT scans reveal a smooth or lobulated tumour margin, with either iso or homogeneously low attenuation. Leiomyoma and GIST may appear as a well-circumscribed, intensely enhancing mass or may be a sessile (Fig. 12), pedunculated, polypoidal, exo­phytic intraluminal solid mass, sometimes with sec­ondary ulceration. Leiomyomas are the only tumours that may contain calcification (Fig. 13). Absence of infiltration of theoesophageal wall ortheabsence of the typical circumferential growth pattern enables differ­entiation from oesophageal cancer. GISTs may not change in size or may even enlarge during therapy, but show a decrease in CT attenuation values (Hounsfield
380 A. Ba-Ssalamah et al.
https://t.me/med1917
Fig. 12 Hydro-MDCT of the oesophagus in axial (a), coronal (b) and sagittal (c) reformations in a patient with leiomyoma,
demonstrated as a small soft tissue mass with slight calcifications in thoracic area of the oesophagus (arrows)
Fig. 13 Hydro-MDCT of the oesophagus in axial (a), coronal
(b) and sagittal (c) reformations in a patient with biopsy-proven leiomyoma, demonstrated as a large tumour-like mass with
units, HU) (Choi et al. 2004). PET/CT is able to show early effects in patients undergoing treatment. Func­tional imaging proved significantly more accurate than CT alone when assessing GIST response to therapy. Combined PET/CT imaging is, therefore, a valuable diagnostic tool for the primary diagnosis of GISTs or for the assessment of therapeutic response (Suga et al.
2009; Antoch et al. 2004).
5.3 Fibrovascular Polyps
Fibrovascular polyps of the oesophagus are rare benign tumours, comprising about 1 % of all benign oesophageal tumours. However they are the most common intraluminal benign tumours of the oesoph­agus (Sargent and Hood 2006). Giant fibrovascular
marked calcifications invading the oesophagus in the thoracic area (arrows)
polyps are defined as polyps larger than 5 cm in maximum diameter. Even though they are benign, they may be lethal due to either bleeding or, rarely, asphyxiation if a large polyp is regurgitated. Patients commonly present with dysphagia or hematemesis.
5.3.1 CT Findings
The polyps may not be well visualised on endoscopy and imaging plays a vital role in aiding diagnosis as well as providing important information for preoper­ative planning, such as the location of the pedicle, the vascularity of the polyp and the tissue elements of the mass. These polyps contain predominantly fibrovas­cular and fatty tissue, which gives them their typical CT appearance of a pedunculated intraluminal mass of fat density, which expands the oesophagus (Ascenti et al. 1999).
Cross-Sectional Imaging of the Oesophagus 381
https://t.me/med1917
5.4 Oesophageal Fistula
Oesophageal fistulas can be classified according to their anatomic relationship into oesophageal-airway, oesophago-pleural, aorto-oesophageal and oesophago­pericardial fistulas. Oesophageal-airway fistulas can be either congenital (so-called tracheo-oesophageal fistulas) or acquired. The development of an oesopha­geal–airway fistula is a life-threatening complication of oesophageal cancer or secondary to oesophageal trauma, infection, or radiochemotherapy. Initial symptoms most often include cough, aspiration and fever, frequentlyculminating inpneumonia. More than half such fistulas involve the trachea; alternatively, a connection with the left or right main or lower lobe bronchus may be formed. Patients with oesophageal­airway fistulas are treated withcovered stents toseal off the leak. CT may benecessary to localise the fistulaand to aid in treatment planning. CT can also be used to detect pleuro-plumonary or mediastinal inflammatory reactions to oesophageal fistulae (Peyrin-Biroulet et al.
2006; Liu et al. 2006).
5.4.1 CT Findings
CT can demonstrate a fistulous connection between the oesophagus and the tracheobronchial system, pleura, pericardium, or mediastinal fat if the fistulous tract is of sufficient size and contains air or oral contrast medium. Oral administration of dilute iodine contrast material (contrast material: water 1:100) can help to delineate the fistula. CT can also detect peri­focal reactions in the form of empyema, pneumonia, or mediastinitis (Fig. 14).
5.5 Oesophageal Perforation
Oesophageal injuries include penetrating injuries, blunt traumatic perforation, iatrogenic perforation as well as spontaneous perforation due to a sudden rise in intralu­minal pressure during vomiting (so-called Boerhaave syndrome). Most often, oesophageal perforation occurs during endoscopic investigation of malignant disease and presents a difficult problem. Oesophageal diseases, suchas strictures,achalasia,andtumours,predisposethe oesophagus to perforation. Oesophageal perforation is associated with high mortality, and postoperative leaks
Fig. 14 Hydro-MDCT of the oesophagus in axial (a) and
sagittal (b) reformations in a patient with a clinical history of oesophageal cancer with symptoms suspicious for fistula, due to continuous coughing and recurrent pneumonia, shows a fistula tract between the tumour and the trachea (arrows)
382 A. Ba-Ssalamah et al.
https://t.me/med1917
Fig. 15 Hydro-MDCT of the oesophagus in axial (a), coronal
(b), and sagittal (c) reformations in a patient with oesophageal perforation after dilation of tumour stenosis. CT scan shows
Fig. 16 Hydro-MDCT of the oesophagus in a patient with primary achalasia shows a marked diffuse dilatation of the entire
oesophagus, which is filled with fluid and food without wall thickening and malignancy (arrows)
occur frequently after primary surgical repair (Chao et al. 2005). Early and accuratediagnosis of oesophageal perforation is critical, because the consequences of missed oesophageal injury are devastating, with poten­tial progression to fulminate mediastinitis and septic shock. Delay in treatment beyond 24 h after onset may adversely affect prognosis. Contrast studies are the method of choice to demonstrate oesophageal rupture.
pneumomediastinum, and air bubbles in the mediastinum (a, b, arrows),as wellasa tissuedefectof theoesophagealwall(arrows), and extensive soft tissue emphysema in the cervical region (c)
nasogastric tube when it is inserted, and a left lower lobe atelectasis. CT can also display subtle signs such as localised oesophageal wall thickening, mucosal hyperemia, mucosal dissection, and oesophageal hematoma, as well as oedema (De Lutio di Castelgui­done et al. 2005). CT also allows the visualisation of very small collections of mediastinal air in cases with small tears (Fig. 15).
CT has been increasingly used for the diagnosis of oesophageal injuries (LeBlang and Nunez 1999).
6 Other Conditions
5.5.1 CT Findings
Radiographic detection of oesophageal injuries relies on the presence of indirect radiological signs, including subcutaneous or muscular, thoracic or cervical emphysema, a widened mediastinum, pneumomedi­astinum, pneumopericardium, left-sided pneumotho­rax, pleural effusion, an abnormal course of a
6.1 Achalasia
Achalasia is a primary rare motor disorder of the oesophagus, with an incidence of about 1/100,000. Symptoms usually become manifest in early adult age, but even children may be affected. Achalasia is
Cross-Sectional Imaging of the Oesophagus 383
https://t.me/med1917
Botoman 1987). In 1947, Ogilvie recognised the syndrome of neoplastic involvement of the distal oesophagus that mimicked idiopathic achalasia, with submucosal infiltration of the lower oesophagus and cardia by carcinoma, which is now commonly refer­red to as pseudoachalasia (Carter et al. 1997). Therefore, CT can be helpful in differentiating between achalasia and the pseudoachalasia of malig­nancy. Usually endoscopy and biopsy are used to detect tumour spread in pseudoachalasia. However, CT may be used in suspect cases, when submucosal tumour growth escaped endoscopic detection. More­over, CT may delineate the presence of other tumour manifestations (Carter et al. 1997).
6.1.1 CT Findings
CT shows uniform dilatation that affects a long seg­ment of the oesophagus, with no wall thickening and with normal-appearing boundary surfaces and medi­astinal fat. The oesophagus narrows abruptly at the oesophagogastric junction with no evidence of an intramural or extrinsic obstructive lesion (Fig. 16). In contrast to a stricture, the oesophageal wall is not thinned at the site of the narrowing, and the wall is not thickened as it is with the oesophageal tumour or oesophagitis. Most pseudoachalasia patients have CT findings of oesophageal dilation, more marked and/or asymmetric wall thickening, or mass. In this group, asymmetric or marked thickening ([10mm) indicates pseudoachalasia.
Fig. 17 Hydro-MDCT of the oesophagus in axial (a), and
sagittal (b) reformations shows a small, circumscribed bulge at the gastroesophageal junction, representing a small diverticu­lum (arrow)
characterised by incomplete relaxation of the lower oesophageal sphincter (LES) on swallowing and aperistalsis of the oesophageal body (Gelfand and
6.2 Diverticula
Oesophageal diverticula are divided into the pulsion or traction type. The two predominant locations of oesophageal diverticula are the mid-oesophagus (at the level of the tracheal bifurcation) and the distal oesoph­agus (so-called epiphrenic diverticula). Diverticula are incidental findings at CT (Pearlberg et al. 1983).
6.2.1 CT Findings
Diverticula appear as an air-, water- or contrast-filled bulge. Mid-oesophageal and epiphrenic diverticula are better visualised on coronal or sagittal (Fig. 17). reformations on hydro-MDCT. The most frequent location is posteroinferior to the cricoid cartilage, the so-called Zenker diverticulum, which actually is a pharyngeal diverticulum (Fig. 18).