Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_1015_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
25 Мб
Скачать
172 O. Ekberg
https://t.me/med1917
is a complex interaction of excitatory and inhibitory stimuli. It should be remembered that denervation of smooth musculature leadstocontraction. It maywellbe that these patients have lost contact between the dorsal motor nucleus of the vagus nerve and the smooth muscle of the esophagus and that we are observing the activity of the enteric nervous system. Such corkscrew esophagus is notthe same asnutcracker esophagus seen in young patients. Nutcracker esophagus has normal transportation but an increased contraction pressure. Diffuse esophageal spasm (DES) and corkscrew con­tractions differ in such a way thatit isconsidered thatin the DES the peristaltic contraction obliterates the lumen, whereas in the corkscrew esophagus contrac­tion does not obliterate the lumen. However, DES and curling or corkscrew dysfunction may be closely rela­ted. They both fall into the category of spastic esoph­ageal dysfunction.
8 Gastroesophageal Reflux
It is important to realize that gastroesophageal reflux
Fig. 4 Esophageal dysmotility is common in the elderly. This
patient shows multiple nonpropulsive contractions of the distal esophagus. This may, as in this patient, be very symptomatic. This 81-year-old woman vomited halfway through every meal. The barium study shows retention due to the motor dysmotility. Other patients might show similar esophageal dysfunction but do not vomit and are not otherwise symptomatic either
lower esophageal sphincter resting pressure does not differ between the young and the elderly (Shaker
1993).
Esophageal dysmotility is one of the major reasons for drug-induced esophagitis. Commonlyreported drugs are NSAIDs, tetracycline derivates, potassium chloride, and now also alendronate. Esophageal injury may be related to acidic pH with some ofthese drugs. However, potassium chloride causes injury by acting on smooth muscles,particularly on the smallarteriole in the mucosa and submucosa, thereby causing an ischemic lesion which may lead to fibrosis and stricture. Such drug­inducedesophagitismaybeovercomeifthepatienttakes precautions in terms of drinking before and after inges­tion, and also to ingest in an upright position.
One common observation in the elderly is so-called corkscrew esophagus. It has a very impressive radio­logic appearance. It may or may not be symptomatic. Control ofmotor activity in peristalsis in the esophagus
disease may cause strictures in the esophagus as fre­quently in the elderly as in younger patients. Key to the diagnosis here is, of course, endoscopy, and also double contrast examination. The history taking in these patients must focus on other classic symptoms or gastroesophageal reflux (Castell 1990; Fulp et al.
1990; Hey et al. 1982; Kikendall et al. 1983; McCord
and Clouse 1990; Semble et al. 1989; Siebens et al.
1986; Tucker et al. 1978).
References
Baum BJ, Bodner L (1983) Aging and oral motor function:
evidence for altered performance among older persons. J Dent Res 62:2–6
Borgström PS, Ekberg O (1988a) Pharyngeal dysfunction in the
elderly. J Med Imaging 2:74–81
Borgström PS, Ekberg O (1988b) Speed of peristalsis in
pharyngeal, constrictor musculature: correlation to age.
Dysphagia 2:140–144 Buchholz D (1992) Editorial. Dysphagia 7:148–149 Castell DO (1990) Esophageal disorders in the elderly.
Gastroenterol Clin North Am 19:235 Colodny N (2001) Effects of age, gender, disease, and
multisystem involvement on oxygen saturation levels in
dysphagic persons. Dysphagia 16:48–57 Cook IJ, Dent J, Collins SM (1989) Upper esophageal sphincter
tone and reactivity to stress in patients with a history of
globus sensation. Dig Dis Sci 34:672–676
The Geriatric Pharynx and Esophagus 173
https://t.me/med1917
Dodds WJ, Logemann JA, Stewart ET (1990) Radiologic
assessment of abnormal oral and pharyngeal phases of swallowing. Am J Roentgenol 154:965–974
Doggett DL, Tappe KA, Mitchell MD, Chapell R, Coates V,
Turkelson CM (2001) Prevention of pneumonia in elderly stroke patients by systematic diagnosis and treatment of dysphagia: an evidence-based comprehensive analysis of the literature. Dysphagia 16:279–295
Donner MW, Jones B (1991) Aging and neurological disease.
In: Jones B, Donner MW (eds) Normal and abnormal swallowing: imaging in diagnosis and therapy. Springer, New York
Ekberg O, Feinberg MJ (1991) Altered swallowing function in
elderly patients with dysphagia: radiographic findings in 56 patients. Am J Roentgenol 156:1181–1184
Ekberg O, Hamdy S, Woisard V, Wuttge-Hannig A, Ortega P
(2002) Social and mental burden of dysphagia: Its impact on diagnosis and treatment. Dysphagia 17:139–146
Feinberg MJ, Ekberg O (1991) Videofluoroscopy in elderly
patients with aspiration: importance of evaluating both oral and pharyngeal stages of deglutition. Am J Roentgenol 156: 293–296
Feinberg MJ, Ekberg O, Segall L, Tully J (1992) Deglutition in
elderly patients with dementia: findings of videofluoro­graphic evaluation and impact on staging and management. Radiology 183:811–814
Feinberg MJ, Knebl J, Tully J (1996) Prandial aspiration and
pneumonia in an elderly population followed over 3 years. Dysphagia 11:104–109
Fulp SR, Dalton CB, Castell JA, Castell DO (1990) Aging-
related alterations in human upper esophageal sphincter function. Am J Gastroenterol 85:1569–1572
Groher ME (1983) Mechanical disorders of swallowing. In:
Groher ME (ed) Dysphagia: diagnosis and management. Butterworth, Worburn, pp 61–84
Groher ME, Bukatman R (1986) The prevalence of swallowing
disorders in two teaching hospitals. Dysphagia 1:3–6
Hey H, Jorgensen F, Sorensen K et al (1982) Esophageal transit
of six commonly used tablets and capsules. Br Med J 285:717
Hirst LJ, Ford GA, Gibson GJ, Wilson JA (2002) Swallow-
induced alterations in breathing in normal older people. Dysphagia 17:152–161
Jones B, Donner MW (1991) Adaptation, compensation, and
decompensation. In: Jones B, Donner MW (eds) Normal and abnormal swallowing: imaging in diagnosis and ther­apy. Springer, New York
Kendall KA, Leonard RJ (2001) Pharyngeal constriction in
elderly dysphagic patients compared with young and elderly nondysphagic controls. Dysphagia 16:272–278
Kikendall JW, Friedman AC, Oyewole MA et al (1983) Pill-
induced esophageal injury: case reports and review of the medical literature. Dig Dis Sci 28:174
Kirkwood TBL (2000) Biological origins of ageing. In:
Grimley Evans J, Franklin Williams F et al (eds) Oxford textbook of geriatric medicine, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 35–42
Langmore SE, Terpenning MS, Schork A, Chen YM,
Murray JT, Lopatin D, Loeshe WJ (1998) Predictors of aspiration pneumonia: how important is dysphagia?. Dys­phagia 13:69–81
Levine R, Robbins JA, Maser A (1992) Periventricular white
matter changes and oropharyngeal swallowing in normal
individuals. Dysphagia 7:142–147 Logemann JA (1983) Evaluation and treatment of swallowing
disorders. College Hill Press, San Diego, pp 64–69 Logemann JA (1990) Effects of aging on the swallowing
mechanism. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 23:1045–1056 McCord GS, Clouse RE (1990) Pill-induced esophageal
strictures: clinical features and risk factors for development.
Am J Med 88:512 Nilsson H, Ekberg O, Bülow M, Hindfelt B (1997) Assessment
of respiration during video fluoroscopy of dysphagic
patients. Acad Radiol 4:503–507 Ohmae Y, Inouye T, Kitahara S (1993) Relationship between
cervical osteophytes and globus sensation: a study based on
altered swallowing function. Nippon Jibiinkoka Gakkai
Kaiho 96:379–386 Perlman AL,GuthmillerSchultz J, VanDaele DJ (1993) Effects of
age, gender, bolus volume, and bolus viscosity on oropharyn-
geal pressure during swallowing. J Appl Physiol 75:33–37 Pontoppidan H, Beecher HK (1960) Progressive loss of
protective reflexes in the airway with advance of age.
JAMA 174:2209–2213 Richter JE, Wu WC, Johns DN, Blackwell JN, Nelson JL,
Castell JA, Castell DO (1987) Esophageal manometry in 95
healthy adults volunteers. Dig Dis Sci 32:583–592 Robbins J, Hamilton JW, Lof GL, Kempster GB (1992)
Oropharyngeal swallowing in normal adults of different
ages:. Gastroenterology 103:823–829 Schoenen J (1991) Clinical anatomy of the spinal cord. Neurol
Clin 9:503–532 Semble EL, Wu WC, Castell DO (1989) Nonsteroidal antiin-
flammatory drugs and esophageal injury. Semin Arth
Rheum 19:99 Shaker R (1993) Effect of aging on the deglutitive oral,
pharyngeal and esophageal motor function. DRS,
2nd annual scientific meeting, DRS, Lake Geneva, Wis-
consin, Oct 22–24, 1993 Shaker R, Cook IJS, Dodds WJ, Hogan WJ (1988) Pressure-flow
dynamicsof the oral phase ofswallowing. Dysphagia 3:79–84 Shaker R, Dodds WJ, Podursan MC et al (1990) Effect of aging
on pharynx and upper esophageal sphincter (UES). Gastro-
enterology 98:A432 (abstract) Shaker R, Ren J, Podvrsan B, Dodds WJ, Hogan WJ, Kern M,
Hoffmann R, Hintz J (1993) Effect of aging and bolus
variables on pharyngeal and upper esophageal sphincter
motor function. Am J Physiol 264:G427–G432 Shaw DW, Cook IJ, Dent J, Simula ME, Panagopoulos V,
Gabb M, Shearman DJ (1990) Age influences oropharyn-
geal and upper esophageal sphincter function during swal-
lowing. Gastroenterology 98:A390 Sheth N, Diner WC (1988) Swallowing problems in the elderly.
Dysphagia 2:209–215 Siebens H, Trupe E, Siebens A et al (1986) Correlates and
consequences of eating dependency in institutionalised
elderly. J Am Geriatr Soc 34:192 Soergel KH, Zboralske FF, Amberg JR (1964) Presbyesopha-
gus: esophageal motility in nonagenarians. J Clin Invest
43:1472–1479 Sonies BC, Tone M, Shawker T (1984) Speech and swallowing
in the elderly. Gerodontology 3:115–123
174 O. Ekberg
https://t.me/med1917
Sonies B, Parent L, Morrish K et al (1988) Durational aspects of
the oropharyngeal phase in normal adults. Dysphagia 3:1–10
Strasser G, Schima W, Schober E, Pokieser P, Kaider A,
Denk DM (2000) Cervical osteophytes impinging on the pharynx: importance of size and concurrent disorders for development of aspiration. Am J Roentgenol 174:449–453
Tracy JF, Logemann JA, Kahrilas PJ, Jacob P, Kobara M,
Krugler C (1989) Preliminary observations on the effects of age on oropharyngeal deglutition. Dysphagia 4:90–94
Tucker HJ, Snape WJ, Cohen S (1978) Achalasia secondary to
carcinoma: manometric and clinical features. Ann Intern Med 89:315
Vijayashankar N, Brody H (1979) A quantitativ estudy of the
pigmented neurons in the neuclei locus coeruleus and
subcoeruleus in man as related to aging. J Neuropathol Exp
Neurol 38:490–497 Volicer L, Seltzer B, Rheaume Y et al (1989) Eating difficulties
in patients with probable dementia of the Alzheimer type.
J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 2:188–195 Wilson JA, Pryde A, Macintyre CCA (1989) Normal pharyn-
goesophageal motility: a study of 50 healthy volunteers. Dig
Sis Sci 34:1590–1599 Zboralske FF,Amberg JR, Soergel KH (1964)Presbyesophagus:
cineradiographic manifestations. Radiology 82:463–467
Voice and Dysphagia
https://t.me/med1917
Daniele Farneti
Contents
1 Introduction.............................................................. 176
2 Phylogenetic Development...................................... 176
2.1 Subglottic Pressure and Breathing............................ 177
2.2 Subglottic Pressure and Phonoarticulation ............... 177
2.3 Subglottic Pressure and Deglutition ......................... 179
3 Professional Voice Users......................................... 180
4 Common Physiological Events ............................... 180
4.1 Physical Adaptations in Artistic
Voice Production ....................................................... 180
5 Common Pathological Events ................................ 182
5.1 Vocal Alterations ....................................................... 182
5.2 Deglutition Alterations .............................................. 184
5.3 The Effects of Reflux................................................ 185
6 Recent Contributions in the Literature................ 185
References.......................................................................... 188
D. Farneti (&) Voice and Swallowing Center, ‘‘Infermi’’ Hospital, Rimini, Italy e-mail: lele_doc@libero.it
Abstract
The anatomical interaction between the upper respiratory and digestive tracts conditions the smooth running of their functions: breathing, swallowing and voice articulation. The phyloge­netic evolution of our species has rendered possi­ble the optimum integration of these functions, creating the conditions for an extremely refined timing. This functional optimization has facilitated the phonoarticulatory function with the possibility of highly skilled aesthetic results, as in artistic voice production. This anatomical integrity is essential for a proper and optimal functioning. Anatomical alteration may change a function, just as a functional alteration may facilitate, in the presence of comorbidity, anatomical changes. In singing, for example, the physiological adjust­ments required to produce a more resonant voice can alter, over time, the physiological characteris­tics of the structures involved in swallowing. The lowering of the laryngotracheal axis, which facil­itates the mechanisms of articulation and vocal projection, may affect the timing of swallowing. The pressures usually required in singing can modify the functioning of the valves between the chest and abdominal cavities. The chapter reviews the main changes in the physiological and phys­iopathological characteristics of the upper respira­tory and digestive tracts and the impact that artistic vocal performances have on swallowing. Similar considerations are made for other voice users. The chapter concludes with a review of the literature on the topic.
O. Ekberg (ed.), Dysphagia, Medical Radiology. Diagnostic Imaging, DOI: 10.1007/174_2011_341, Ó Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012
175
176 D. Farneti
https://t.me/med1917
1 Introduction
Under an anatomical and functional profile the assessment of interactions between upper respiratory and digestive tracts represents a field of great interest (Laitman and Reindenberg 1993). According to the natural indications derived from phylogenesis and ontogenesis, the interaction between the respiratory and digestive systems, in the head and neck, can actually be evaluated almost completely and at the various stages of life, including the intrauterine stage (Wolfson and Laitman 1990). Upper airways can be examined from the nostrils down to the cervicotho­racic trachea and digestive pathways can be examined from the oral cavity down to the duodenum. The nasal–buccal–pharyngeal–laryngeal ‘‘apparatus’’ has thus become the site of functions that can be clearly identified: many actions and interactions can now be viewed, even though they are still not completely understood.
In the head and neck there are anatomically and functionally integrated activities responsible for per­forming vital functions, such as breathing and swal­lowing and otherequally important non-vitalfunctions, such as phonoarticulation. The phylogenetic evolution of the head and neck has favoured phonation, which is essential for the human species (differentiating it from other, equally developed but non-verbal species), but has penalized the other functions. So, if at birth the newborn baby can be fed and breathe at the same time, after the first monthsoflife, the maturationofthe larynx separates the two functions.
In the course of millennia the possibility of verbal communication has significantly fostered the evolu­tion of our species, with an increasingly important role of verbal production (Purves and Litchman
1985). Only over the last few decades has the intro-
duction of different communication modalities and systems (e.g. the Internet) reduced or at least modified the interest in such expression, typical of humans. The use of voice as an expression mode is, however, indispensable for various categories of operators, either as an essential part of their everyday working activity or because of its unique and powerful expressive connotations. This is the case in those professionals who use their voice while doing their usual job duties (e.g. teachers, call centre operators, telephonists, shop assistants, lawyers) or those who
co-morbidity
e
f
f e c
t o
r
Fig. 1 Interaction among function, structure and comorbidity
breathing
deglutition
phono-articulation
f u n c t i o n
use it according to ‘‘athletic’’ expressive modalities (e.g. professional classical singers, actors).
As regards the intimate anatomical–functional correlation between the head and neck, as mentioned above, it is quite evident that the unusual employment of the common effectors of breathing, swallowing and phonoarticulation may cause disjoint or joint altera­tions of the functions they perform. The alteration of such functions may, in the case of existing comor­bidity conditions, result in openly pathological events, in the same way as pathological events modify functions (Fig. 1). A vicious cycle is started that may involve both the effectors and the functions according to subsequent and progressive levels of involvement. The alteration of the fine balances of vocal athletic exercises performed by vocal professionals may, for instance, on the one hand, enhance the amplification and capacity of sound, but, on the other, modify their swallowing patterns. The alterations of these events are such as to involve the artists’ emotional sphere, making it more difficult for them to recover preex­isting or modified balanced conditions.
2 Phylogenetic Development
A key element in the balance between respiration, deglutition and phonoarticulation is the position of the larynx inside the visceral space of the neck. In mammals, the cervical rachis consists of seven ver­tebrae: the larynx is usually placed between the first and the third cervical vertebra, with the epiglottis behind the velum of the palate allowing a sort of airway continuity (Soulié and Bardier 1907). In this way the animal can breathe and at the same time
Voice and Dysphagia 177
https://t.me/med1917
ingest food of various thicknesses. This high location of the larynx, which is also found in human newborns, as said above, strongly limits phonoarticulatory capabilities: the pharyngeal cavity is extremely reduced in size and consequently the tongue move­ments inside a relatively less wide cavity are limited. The oral cavity, widened by the lip movements, acts as a resonator for the laryngeal sound (Duchin 1990).
What happens in mammals occurs in the human species in the first months of life. After the sixth month, the larynx starts a descent that brings it to the level of the fourth to seventh cervical vertebrae (Kirchner 1993). This descent is accompanied by a progressive decrease in cranial base angle that in phylogenesis is found only in Homo sapiens (Negus
1949) and, in the development of our species, only
after the second year of life. When the epiglottis leaves its narinal location, the child must be pre­disposed to swallowing in such a way as to protect the lower airways during the passage of the bolus into the pharynx. The laryngeal cavity opens up inside the pharyngeal cavity, thereby imposing the need for a sequential reconfiguration of the organ in relation to what passes through it (breathing con­figuration, swallowing configuration) (Cook and Kahrilas 1999). To facilitate the pharyngeal phase of swallowing and further protect the lower airways, the cervical region has increased its length so as to allow a sufficiently safe deglutition timing and has widened to enable the easy movement of structures (Arensburg et al. 1989). With respect to the phon­oarticulatory capacity, these various changes have certainly represented a significant advantage. The sounds produced in the larynx are amplified in a series of wide and tortuous cavities (vocal tract) with several varieties of harmonic filtering, whereas the transit through the oral cavity allows a very fine articulation thereof (Houghton 1993).
In the aerodigestive crossroads, the hyoid bone plays an important role, since it acts as a kind of balance arm suspended from the skull base, pro­viding insertion to the muscles of the tongue and subhyoid muscles, the suspensors of the laryngeal– tracheal axis. The hyoid bone anchors the oral floor to the cranial base, thereby optimizing the syn­chronization of the tongue movements with the movement of the jaw and palate. Such movements are important in breathing and phonoarticulation (Lieberman 1979).
2.1 Subglottic Pressure and Breathing
Verbal production is a complex anatomofunctional event that involves in parallel and in sequence several organs and systems (Sataloff 1992). The cen­tral impulse activates a series of cortical and sub­cortical areas that act as regulators of muscle effectors distributed in the organs involved to a different extent in the phonoarticulatory function (Jurgens 1974; Lotze et al. 2000).
The respiratory tract structures allow the move­ment of egressive airflow masses coming from the lungs, after gas exchanges (haematosis) (Jaeger and Matthys 1968). When the diaphragm, which is the main inspiratory muscle, contracts, it increases the size of the thoracic cavity. At the end of inspiration, the diaphragm relaxes, and the elastic structures of the chest return to a balanced state, thereby forcing out the previously inhaled air volume and supplying energy: under these circumstances the volumes (400– 500 ml) and the times of the two acts are equivalent. However, the dynamics of the structures involved in breathing for the purpose of phonation change.
During phonation, inspiration is shorter and expi­ration is substantially longer, with some interruptions normally occurring during prosodic breaks within the utterance. The air volumes mobilized are greater. The inspiratory pressure and especially the expiratory pressure against the closed glottis are much higher and always require muscle activation. Fine adjust­ments are necessary to ensure the maintenance of adequate pressure levels according to the acous­tic characteristics of the articulated vocal emission (Baken 1997).
2.2 Subglottic Pressure
and Phonoarticulation
The subglottic pressure ranges from 2–5 cm H2Oin normal talking to 10–20 cm H up to 50–60 cm H
O in singing. In thoracoabdominal
2
breathing, the rib movements and the lowering of the diaphragm provide adequate air supply for any vocal need. In the diaphragm–abdominal muscles antago­nism (the abdominal muscles push and the diaphragm remains in a state of tonic contraction) a precise amount of expiratory flow and pressure generated immediately below the vocal folds (subglottic
O in projected voice
2
178 D. Farneti
https://t.me/med1917
Fig. 2 Interaction of
subglottic pressure between respiration, deglutition and phonation
Lung volumes
BREATHING
DEGLUTITION
=
Larynx
LARYNGEAL SPHINCTER
P subglottic
Subglottic Receptors
protected
Respiratory phase
PHONATION
Pitch Loudness
pressure) is achieved, according to the specific vocal emission requirements (Fig. 2).
2.2.1 Laryngeal Sound
Sound is produced from the exhaled air at the level of the vocal folds. Current theories and models sug­gested to explain such activity derive from Ewald’s myoelastic theory (1898). The contributions of Perello (1962), Hirano (1977), Dejonckère (1987) and Van den Berg (1954) have led to the formulation of the current myelastic aerodynamic theory of the vocal fold vibration. According to this theory, the vibration of vocal folds corresponds to the resolution of the elastic conflict between the air pressure and the clo­sure force of the vocal folds.
When the pressure of the subglottic air exceeds the glottis resistance threshold, the vocal folds separate, the air flows out through the glottis and the subglottic pressure decreases. The vocal folds close back as a result of elastic recoil and mechanical suction (‘‘Bernoulli effect’’): a mucous wave is generated that propagates from the inferior aspect of the vocal fold down to the ventricle, reestablishing first glottis resistance and then subglottic pressure. Cyclic repetition of this mechanism takes place as long as energy is available, resulting in the formation of air
Pharyngeal, Suprahyoid
muscles
Oral cavity
Bolus:
chewing, formation, propulsion
OESOPHAGUS
Oesophagoglottic
reflex
Force, speed, duration of muscle contraction
condensation and rarefaction areas in the glottis (vibratory mechanical wave). The recurrence of the event, in seconds, coincides with the fundamental frequency of the subject’s voice.
The respiratory muscles may affect the funda­mental frequency by regulating the subglottic pres­sure. The hyoid bone regulates the sagittal movements of the larynx: usually larynx lowering is observed during the production of low frequencies, whereas larynx raising occurs for higher frequen­cies. Larynx lowering is associated with a backward tilting of the thyroid cartilage with shortening, decrease in tension and increase in the thickness of the vocal folds, antagonizing the action of the cricothyroid muscle. Larynx lowering (controlled by subhyoid muscles) enhances low tones and length­ens the vocal tract.
The volume of the emitted sound is determined by the amplitude of the ‘‘airflow variation’’ during oscillation of the glottis. This variation is related both to the subglottic pressure and to the amplitude of the glottis movement. The ‘‘airflow’’ is the product of the duct section (glottic surface) and the velocity of the air outflow: the laryngeal muscles influence the quality of the fold closure, whereas the respiratory muscles regulate the subglottic pressure.
Voice and Dysphagia 179
https://t.me/med1917
2.2.2 Articular Adaptation
The acoustic signal produced at the glottic level is a complex, quasi-periodic sound, characterized by a fundamental frequency, responsible for pitch per­ception, and by a series of harmonics at frequencies that are multiples of the fundamental frequency (Titze 1994). By passing through the supraglottic cavities (vocal tract), the laryngeal sound undergoes changes. The first change concerns the spectrum and refers to the energy reinforcement of groups of harmonics during their transit in a chamber, the resonance frequency of which is closer to their harmonic frequency. This energy reinforcement generates the formants that are at the basis of acoustic and perceptive recognition of the sound produced by the speaker. Such modification takes place in a passive way. The laryngeal sound can also undergo active changes by passing inside the vocal tract (Fant 1983). This occurs through the production of aperiodic signals (noise) that replace or are added to the glottic sound (periodic). Such activity as a whole is referred to as articulation and generates voiceless and voiced consonants, respec­tively: as a result thereof, consonants always have an oral (noise) and a laryngeal (sound) source. The sound of vowels, instead, has a laryngeal source, since vowels are articulated in the oral cavity from a mutual relationship of the tongue with the palate and posterior (pharynx wall) and anterior (lips) limiting structures.
2.3 Subglottic Pressure and Deglutition
Air under pressure, which is important in phono­articulation-related mechanisms, plays an equally important role in swallowing (Fig. 2). This occurs by stimulating mechanoreceptors localized in the sub­glottic region of the larynx (Ardzakus and Wyke
1979). This type of receptor has been identified,
although the function of such receptors is not clearly known (Widdicombe 1986). Patients who have had a tracheotomy, for example, adequately ventilate; therefore, the role of such receptors in breathing can be considered as secondary. In addition to their function in breathing and voice production, these receptors are involved in swallowing. The stimulation of subglottic receptors may possibly act as a signal for the central
nervous system that the larynx is ‘‘ready’’ (i.e. pro­tected) for the bolus passage into the pharynx, and this signal may, at the same time, influence the low motor neurons of the brainstem innervating the pharynx.
The precise coordination of the respiratory and digestive systems is crucial in safe swallowing and this is reflected in the closed topographic organiza­tion of respiratory, deglutitory and branchial motor neurons (Larson et al. 1994). The localization, function and interaction of these neurons support the theory of an ‘‘online’’ processing of peripheral af­ferences both at a cortical and at a low brainstem level (Maddock and Gilbert 1993). As a result of the neuroanatomical connection between subglottic receptors and branchial motor neurons for the pharynx and larynx, the feedback from subglottic receptors may presumably affect the recruitment of motor neurons in the brainstem capable of activating the pharyngeal muscles during swallowing so that the force, speed and duration of the muscular con­traction are regulated (normalized) by the closing of the larynx. The stimulation of this reflex arc increases the number of pharyngeal motor neurons, which, in turn, mediate a higher speed of the bolus transit, decreased time of pharyngeal contraction (resulting in a quicker pharyngeal clearing) and a stronger muscular contraction.
This feed-forward system may detect that a sen­sory input (subglottic pressure) has not been received and control a function (swallowing) by increasing the cortical processing, thereby ensuring safe passage of the bolus into the oesophagus. Cortical processing would thus account for a prolonged muscular con­traction (Diez Gross et al. 2003).
Another possibility is that the segmental reflex is involved in bolus propulsion and therefore without said reflex the bolus is propelled more slowly. In this way, the pharyngeal muscles may increase the time of their contraction as a result of the increased latency of the bolus transit. This would partly explain why swallowing occurs in the later part of expiration. Swallowing during expiration helps the lungs fill with air before swallowing and it might be necessary to maximize the subglottic pressure and subsequent swallowing. In this way air is removed from the pharynx (thereby reducing air ingestion) and the exit of the bolus from the airways into the oesophagus is facilitated (Nishino et al. 1985).
180 D. Farneti
https://t.me/med1917
benign cordal lesions, nodules, haemorrhage and cysts
3 Professional Voice Users
All those who use their voice within their professional activity may be deemed as voice professionals. This term makes us initially think of singers, actors or broadcasters, that is professionals who rely or have relied on their voice for their popularity or career. A wide variety of professional operators use their voice in their occupations: teachers, ecclesiastics, lawyers, telemarketers, receptionists and servicemen are just a few of the groups of people for whom oral commu­nication is an essential part of their job. Then there are of course physicians, managers, call centre operators and many others. Although we live in the Internet and e-mail era, we can hardly imagine these professionals without an adequate voice for their professional tasks. In daily clinical phoniatric practice, however, voice disorders are also observed in housewives (Baitha et al. 2002).
Voice professionals can be divided into three main categories: top performers, such as opera singers, for whom any minimal voice alteration may sometimes have disastrous consequences; vocalists, including most other singers and actors; and finally all the other professionals mentioned above.
Workers who rely on their voice as an essential part of their occupation range from 25 to 35% of employees in the USA (Titze et al. 1997) and in other industrialized countries (Vilkman 2000) The profes­sionals who are mostly affected by voice problems are teachers, with an incidence ranging from 38 (Smith et al. 1998) to 80% (Sapir et al. 1993), followed by telemarketers (68%) (Jones et al. 2002), aerobics instructors (44%) (Long et al. 1998) and salesmen (about 4%) (Coyle et al. 2001).
Among the 2,286 dysphonic patients reported by Brodnitz ( 1971), in 80%, dysphonia was due to vocal abuse or psychogenic factors causing dysfunction. Of these patients, 20% had organic lesions that in women were caused in 15% of cases by endocrine alterations. Other frequent causes were infectious laryngitis and reflux laryngitis.
Professional voice users complain of several problems, including hoarseness, vocal breaks, voice loss, hypophonia and vocal fatigue. Correlated symptoms may be phonatory dyspnoea, dry throat or sore throat, constricted sensation and pain. Chronic voice problems may be due to laryngitis and oedemas,
(Wingate et al. 2007).
4 Common Physiological Events
From the considerations illustrated in the previous sections, it appears evident that the respiratory, deglutitory, and phonoarticulatory functions are clo­sely integrated and such integration resides in the integrity of the structures performing these functions.
4.1 Physical Adaptations in Artistic Voice Production
In singing, especially without amplification (classical or lyrical singing), the professional singer needs to exert greater pressures and maintain them for longer periods as compared with the pressures used in nor­mal speech production. The need to obtain a product with a richer timbre (amplification) and carrying greater energy requires mutual adjustments of both the breathing dynamics and the vocal tract (Titze
1994). There is actually the need to realize a wider
filtering resonating chamber while keeping the pres­sures at the lowest possible levels. This is achieved by lowering the larynx and the tongue and through a wider opening of the mouth. The forced and persistent lowering and anchoring of the larynx implies the downward movement of all related structures: hyoid bone and tongue root, with a strongly arched and raised soft palate. In romantic vocal productions all this goes to the benefit of the volume but to the det­riment of articulatory capabilities and voice colouring that were so much appreciated in the previous musical period (Baroque).
As already said, in costal diaphragmatic breathing, during inspiration, the diaphragm contracts and the thoracic cavity becomes wider in its vertical and transverse diameters. During expiration, the breathing phase during which speech production and singing occur, the diaphragm is totally inactive and its rising is regulated only by other respiratory muscles (abdominal muscles, intercostal muscles, etc.). According to the need of producing low-intensity or high-intensity tones, high-pitched or low-pitched tones, or filatura, the behaviour of the respiratory muscles will affect the breathing dynamics. When full
Voice and Dysphagia 181
https://t.me/med1917
volume is reached, the elastic retraction forces of the lungs will spontaneously tend to empty them (as happens during quiet breathing). For most singing requirements, such retraction forces produce a sub­glottic air pressure that needs to be adjusted to the intensity of the sound to be emitted. A force capable of contrasting the elastic forces and reducing the sub­cordal pressure is therefore needed upon the attack of the sound, with an excessive impact on the vocal folds (brusque attack). This is what singers call ‘‘appoggio’’: the thorax is held in position by the action of external intercostal muscles, whereas the abdominal wall supports this activity. During a musical phrase, in order to keep the desired air pressure, the diaphragm starts rising, accompanied by a contraction of the abdominal muscles that provide the ‘‘support’’, which is constantly sought by the singer (Fussi 2003).
4.1.1 Valvular Activities
In these dynamics, diaphragm behaviour should be considered as an antireflux mechanism. Nowadays, it is clear that both the smooth muscle of the distal oesophagus (lower oesophageal sphincter) and the pillars of the diaphragm (crural diaphragm) represent the distal protection mechanisms of the oesophagus (Mittal and Balaban 1997). Changes in distal oesophageal pressures are correlated to contractions of the oesophagus and stomach (Dent et al. 1983), whereas crural contractions are related to the amount of inspiration or to the performing of activities increasing intra-abdominal pressure (e.g. Valsalva manoeuvre, cough, defecation, delivery) (Mittal et al.
1990): this mechanism is much more dynamic, pow-
erful and effective in guaranteeing containment to the lower oesophageal sphincter. Furthermore, when the intra-abdominal pressure increases, a reflex is gener­ated that causes crural contraction and an increase in the lower oesophageal sphincter pressure (Shafik et al.
2004). The crura, however, consist of easily fatigable
striated muscle fibres that are therefore inadequate for prolonged or too fast performances, which are quite often required in singing, for instance in supporting prolonged and sustained musical phrases or vocal exercises at extreme pitches. The air compression generated in the rib cage by the push action of the abdominal muscles and by the lowering of the ster­num increases the expiratory push but compresses the stomach, antagonizing the lower oesophageal sphincter. These dynamics may also account for the
PATHOPHYSIOLOGICAL EVENTS
UES failure UES dysfunction
increased pressure in the pharynx
- dorsal or lateral pharyngeal pouches
- diverticula
Fig. 3 Direct contact of refluxate with laryngeal structures.
UES upper oesophageal sphincter
hyoid bone
-pharyngeal inflammation
- oesophageal inflammation
-webs
lack of protection
- refluxate penetration
- laryngeal aspiration/penetration
pharynx
cricopharyngeus m
+
agonist
antagonist
Fig. 4 Indirect involvement of laryngeal structure
larynx
increase in high-reflux episodes up into the pharynx during physical activity (Emerenziani et al. 2005)or with increased intra-abdominal pressure. Under these conditions there might be a direct contact of the refluxate with the laryngeal structures (direct mech­anism) (Fig. 3), which can also occur by means of a
Distal reflux through the lower oesophageal sphincter causes, through a neural or neurohumoral transmission route, a dysfunction in the upper oesophageal sphincter which may result in a reduced
-
oesophagus