Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_3737_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
27 Мб
Скачать
306
https://t.me/med1917
might happen because of the dilated coronary artery at proximal to stula and low ow state.
Key Points
– Coronary-cameral stulas (CCFs) as a
subset of coronary artery stulas (CAFs) are abnormal communication between coronary arteries and cardiac chambers.
– The most common CAFs originate from
the right coronary system and drain the right ventricle or right atrium.
2D and color Doppler study by transtho-
racic echocardiography is valuable by
demonstrating the dilated coronary artery at origin and high velocity con-
A. Sadeghpour et al.
tinuous turbulent ow at the site of ter­mination of the CCFs.
– Cardiac CT angiography is the pre-
procedural planning imaging modality that dening the stula’s origin, size, anatomic course, and termination site.
– In properly selected patients with symp-
tomatic medium or large-size CAFs, transcatheter closure is an effective and safe alternative procedure to surgery with reported complete occlusion of 80–95% considering that heart team approach is highly recommended.
Imaging study Benets Disadvantages Echocardiogram
CT
CMR
– Screening tool providing the hemodynamic effect of CAFs (the
size and function of the cardiac chambers), regional wall motion abnormality, valvular insufciency secondary to papillary muscle dysfunction, and visualizing the dilated stulous course. Color ow imaging (CFI) showing high velocity continuous turbulent ow at the site of termination of the CCFs.
– Echocardiogram could demonstrate concomitant congenital
anomalies – No radiation – ECG-gated CT angiography and 3D volume-rendered imaging
are preferred pre-procedural planning imaging modality by
providing a precise delineation of the origin, course, and
drainage site of CAFs. – CT is helpful in choosing appropriate treatment approach
(surgical or transcatheter closure [TCC]) and device selection
and nding the optimal uoroscopic angles. – Additionally it is helpful in the evaluation of the presence of
other intrathoracic vascular communications or associated
congenital anomalies
– Provides with the cardiac chambers, accurate ventricular
function, shunt ow assessment (Qp:Qs), and associated
anomalies – No radiation. – valuable for the anatomic and hemodynamic assessment of
CAFs, and myocardial perfusion imaging can be added for
evaluating the CCFs related ischemia
– Limited value for
providing detail anatomy and course of coronary arteries [28]
– Radiation exposure – Risk of iodinated
contrast nephropathy
– Needs patient’s
cooperation and sometimes deep sedation
– Sub optimal
imaging in the setting of arrhythmias or irregular heart rate
Coronary Cameral Fistula Closure
https://t.me/med1917
307
Disclosures There are no conicts of interest to disclose.
Chapter Review Questions
1. A 43-year-old man with a continuous murmur underwent transthoracic echocardiography. He had a possible diagnosis of LAD to the right ventricle coronary cameral stula (CCF). Which of the following ndings are NOT con­sistent with the diagnosis of CCF:
A. Ischemic chest pain B. Cardiac chamber enlargement C. Left ventricular systolic dysfunction D. Cyanosis
Answer: D
Explanation: Sizable stulas may result in
signicant left to right shunt and causing car­diac chamber dilatation or myocardial isch­emia distal to coronary stula due to steal phenomenon and consequently left ventricu­lar dysfunction.
2. A 55-year-old woman with typical ischemic chest pain and past medical history of MVR was diagnosed with sizable coronary cameral stulas (CCF). The proximal diameter of the feeding coronary artery was 10 mm. She underwent transcatheter closure of the CCFs based on the heart team’s decision. The patient complained of chest pain before discharge. Which of the following is the most possible diagnosis in this patient:
A. Coil embolization B. Myocardial infarction due to thrombus
formation
C. Mitral prostheses malfunction due to
interference of prostheses with the CCF’s occluder
D. It is a normal nding after CCFs closure
with no clinical signicanceAnswer: B
Explanation: Although complications are rare in properly selected patients for CCF transcatheter closure, we should be aware that coil embolization, transient T-wave abnormal­ity or bundle branch block, and myocardial infarction might happen. An enlarged proxi­mal coronary artery with a diameter ≥10mm
has a higher risk of thromboses and myocar­dial infarction after closure.
3. The most common type of coronary artery s­tulas (CAFs) are:
A. RCA origin draining into the RA or RV B. LCX origin draining into the LA or LV C. LAD origin draining in to the RV D. LCX draining into the RV
Answer: A
Explanation: The most common type of
CAF’s originates from the right coronary sys­tem and drains the right ventricle or right atrium.
4. Which cardiac imaging is recommended for the preprocedural evaluation of a patient with a suspected coronary cameral stula (CCF)?
A. 2D transthoracic echocardiography (TTE)
is adequate for preprocedural planning.
B. Cardiac MRI is more valuable than car-
diac CT in identifying the whole course of the coronary anatomy and is preferred for preprocedural planning, with the added benet of lack of radiation exposure for the patient.
C. Transesophageal echocardiogram with 3D
imaging of the CCF origin is preferred for pre-procedural planning.
D. Cardiac CT is the preferred imaging
modality for pre-procedural planning.Answer: D
Explanation: Cardiac CT is the preferred imaging modality for pre-procedural planning.
Initial identication of CCF’s is best made by TTE to evaluate the etiology and site of ter­mination of high-velocity continuous ow of CCF’s. Preprocedural planning however requires a more comprehensive evaluation of the course of the CCF as can be obtained from the CT.
Answer B is not correct. Cardiac MRI pro­vides excellent visualization of the proximal course of the CCF but is not adequate for comprehensive pre-procedural planning.TEE imaging may identify the proximal blood ow into CCF with the opportunity to visualize the termination on color ow imaging, but is inadequate for pre-procedural planning.
308
https://t.me/med1917
A. Sadeghpour et al.
References
1. Lim JJ, Jung JI, Lee BY, Lee HG. Prevalence and types of coronary artery stulas detected with coronary CT angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014;203(3):W237–43.
2. Kim MS, Jung JI, Chun HJ.Coronary to pulmonary artery stula: morphologic features at multidetec­tor CT. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010;26(suppl
2):273–80.
3. Mavroudis C, Backer CL, Rocchini AP, Muster AJ, Gevitz M.Coronary artery stulas in infants and chil­dren: a surgical review and discussion of coil emboli­zation. Ann Thorac Surg. 1997;63:1235–42.
4. Challoumas D, Pericleous A, Dimitrakaki IA, Danelatos C, Dimitrakakis G. Coronary arteriove­nous stulae: a review. Int J Angiol. 2014;23(1):1–10.
https://doi.org/10.1055/s- 0033- 1349162.
5. Gillebert C, Van Hoof R, Van De Werf F, Piessens J, De Geest H.Coronary artery stulas in an adult popu­lation. Eur Heart J. 1986;7(5):437–43.
6. Fernandes ED, Kadivar H, Hallman GL, Reul GJ, Ott DA, Cooley DA. Congenital malformations of the coronary arteries: the Texas Heart Institute experi­ence. Ann Thorac Surg. 1992;54:732–40.
7. Sakakibara S, Yokoyama M, Takao A, Nogi M, Gomi H. Coronary arteriovenous stula: nine operated cases. Am Heart J. 1966;72:307–14.
8. Latson LA.Coronary artery stulas: how to manage them. Cathet Cardiov Interv. 2007;70(1):110–6.
9. Said SA, Van Der Werf T. Dutch survey of coronary artery stulas in adults: congenital solitary stulas. Int J Cardiol. 2006;106(3):323–32.
10. Ata Y, Turk T, Bicer M, Yalcin M, Ata F, Yavuz S.Coronary arteriovenous stulas in the adults: natu­ral history and management strategies. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2009;4(1):62.
11. Dodge-Khatami A, Mavroudis C, Backer CL.Congenital heart surgery nomenclature and data­base project: anomalies of the coronary arteries. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;69(3 Suppl 1):270–7.
12. Moe TG.The multidisciplinary heart team approach to management of coronary artery stula with the assistance of 3D image reconstruction*. JACC Case Rep. 2020;2(11):1739–41.
13. Valente AM, Lock JE, Gauvreau K, etal. Predictors of long-term adverse outcomes in patients with congeni­tal coronary artery stulae. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2010;3(2):134–9.
14. Warnes CA, Williams RG, Bashore TM, etal. ACC/ AHA 2008 guidelines for the management of adults with congenital heart disease: executive summary— a report of the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (Writing committee to develop guidelines for the management of adults with congenital heart disease). Circulation. 2008;118(23):2395–451. 67.
15. Stout KK, Daniels CJ, Aboulhosn JA, etal. 2018 AHA/ ACC guideline for the management of adults with congenital heart disease: executive summary: a report
of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on clinical practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;73:1494–563.
16. Buccheri D, Chirco PR, Geraci S, Caramanno G, Cortese B. Coronary artery stulae: anatomy, diagnosis and management strategies. Heart Lung Circ. 2018;27(8):940–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
hlc.2017.07.014.
17. Al-Hijji M, El Sabbagh A, El Hajj S, AlKhouli M, El Sabawi B, Cabalka A, etal. Coronary artery stulas: indications, techniques, outcomes, and complications of transcatheter stula closure. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2021;14(13):1393–406.
18. Boyle S, Jesuthasan LSB, Jenkins C, Challa P, Ranjan S, Dahiya A.Coronary-cameral stula. Circ Cardiov Imaging. 2019;12(5):e008691.
19. Kamiya H, Yasuda T, Nagamine H, et al. Surgical treatment of congenital coronary artery stulas: 27 years’ experience and a review of the literature. J Card Surg. 2002;17:173–7.
20. Dimitrakakis G, Otto von Oppell U. eComment: sur­gical treatment of coronary arteriovenous stulas. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2011;13:674–5.
21. Wang S, Wu Q, Hu S, etal. Surgical treatment of 52 patients with congenital coronary artery stulas. Chin Med J. 2001;114(7):752–5.
22. Cheung DL, Au WK, Cheung HH, Chiu CS, Lee WT.Coronary artery stulas: long-term results of sur­gical correction. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;71(1):190–5.
23. Carrel T, Tkebuchava T, Jenni R, Arbenz U, Turina M.Congenital coronary stulas in children and adults: diagnosis, surgical technique and results. Cardiology. 1996;87:325–30.
24. Goto Y, Abe T, Sekine S, Iijimaa K, Kondoha K, Sakurada T.Surgical treatment of the coronary artery to pulmonary artery stulas in adults. Cardiology. 1998;89:252–6.
25. Firouzi A, Alemzadeh-Ansari MJ, Mohebbi B, Khajali Z, Khalilipur E, Baay M, Bayatian A, Taherian M, Khosropour A, Hosseini Z. Diverse transcatheter closure strategies in coronary artery s­tulas a state-of-the-art approach. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2021;47:101010.
26. Qureshi SA. Coronary arterial stulas. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2006;1(1):51. https://doi.
org/10.1186/1750- 1172- 1- 51.
27. Ilkay E, Celebi OO, Kacmaz F, et al. Percutaneous closure of coronary artery stula: long-term fol­low- up results. Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej. 2015;11:318–22.
28. Frommelt P, Lopez L, Dimas VV, Eidem B, Han BK, Ko HH, Lorber R, Nii M, Printz B, Srivastava S, Valente AM, Cohen MS. Recommendations for multimodality assessment of congenital coronary anomalies: a guide from the American Society of Echocardiography: developed in collaboration with the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Japanese Society of Echocardiography, and Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2020;33(3):259–94. https://
doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2019.10.011.
Transcatheter Closure ofRuptured
https://t.me/med1917
Sinus ofValsalva
Y.Hejazi, Z.M.Hijazi, andA.Sadeghpour
Abstract
Sinus of Valsalva Aneurysm (SOVA) typically is caused by congenital weakness in the aortic wall of one of three aortic sinuses (most com­monly right) and resulting in outpouching pro­trusion into nearby cardiac chambers. Men are more affected (4:1), and there is a higher reported incidence in Asian groups. SOVA is either congenital or acquired. Congenital ones are seen in connective tissue disorders and in some forms of congenital heart diseases, like ventricular septal defects (VSDs) and bicus­pid aortic valve. Most of these defects are asymptomatic. Acquired SOVAs are seen in patients who suffered abrupt deceleration trauma; infections such as bacterial endocar-
the disease has poor prognosis. Multi-modality imaging plays crucial role in detecting this rare disease and in guiding management. Surgery has been traditionally the treatment of choice. However, several studies reported safety and efcacy of transcatheter treatment. In this chapter, we will discuss multiple imag­ing modalities implemented in diagnosis and transcatheter treatment of ruptured SOVAs, and briey compare surgical and transcatheter treatments approach.
Keywords
Structural heart · Sinus of Valsalva · Ruptured
· Multimodality imaging · Transcatheter
closure ditis, syphilis, and even tuberculosis and degenerative diseases. Though rare, rupture and stulous connections with one of the adja­cent cardiac chambers will give signs and symptoms of heart failure. If left untreated,
Test your learning and check your under-
standing of this book’s contents: use the “Springer Nature Flashcards” app to access questions using ▶ https://sn.pub/
Y. Hejazi Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Sidra Medicine & Weill Cornell Medicine, Doha, Qatar
Z. M. Hijazi (*) Weill Cornell Medicine, Sidra Medicine, Doha, Qatar e-mail: zhijazi@sidra.org
A. Sadeghpour Advanced Cardiovascular Imaging, MedStar Health Research Institute, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA e-mail: anita.sadeghpour@medstar.net
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2024 A. M. Kelsey et al. (eds.), Cardiac Imaging in Structural Heart Disease Interventions,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50740-3_13
ambACS.
To use the app, please follow the instruc-
tions in the chapter “Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.”
309
310
https://t.me/med1917
Y. Hejazi et al.
Learning Objectives
1. To draw cardiologists’ attention to sinus of Valsalva aneurysm, an uncommon disease, which can present with nonspecic signs and symptoms, and can be easily misdiagnosed
2. To review pre-procedural multi-modality imaging modalities in the evaluation of rup­tured sinus of Valsalva
3. Review intra procedural imaging which plays an important role in successful transcatheter closure of ruptured SOVA
4. Briey compare surgical vs transcatheter approach for ruptured SOVA
Case Study
36-year-old female patient was referred to cardiology clinic for evaluation of signs and symptoms of heart failure. She was complaining of exertional dyspnea, easy fatigability, palpitations and atypical chest pain for around 6 months. Physical exam was remarkable for hyperdynamic precor­dium, grade III continuous murmur over the left lower sternal border. ECG: sinus rhythm, non-specic intraventricular con­duction delay, LVH, and no ischemic changes.
Background andDenitions
The sinuses of Valsalva can be identied as small dilatations in the aortic wall just above each cusp of the aortic valve, precisely between the annulus and Sino tubular (ST) junction. They allow aortic valve opening during systole without occlusion of coronary artery ostia [1]. Defect in aortic wall resulting in outpouching protrusion into nearby cardiac chambers is known as Sinus of Valsalva Aneurysm (SOVA). SOVA was rst described by Hope in 1839. Edward and Burchell’s reported that SOVAs are secondary to failure of the aortic media to fuse with the heart during prenatal development. The estimated incidence varies between 0.09 up to 0.96% [25]. Ethnicity plays
an important role in this variable incidence. Chue etal. [6] reported ve times higher incidence of ruptured SOVA (RSOVA) in Far Eastern patients than in Westerns.
SOVAs comprise 0.1–3.5% of all congenital cardiac defects [1]. Typically, men are more affected (4:1), and there is a higher reported inci­dence in Asian groups. Most of these defects are asymptomatic. However, rupture and stulous connections with one of the adjacent cardiac chambers will give signs and symptoms of heart failure. If ruptured SOVAs remain untreated, the prognosis is poor, with a life expectancy of 1-year [1].
Causes andPathophysiology
Embryologically, SOVA forms rst as a blind diverticulum secondary to pressure forces on the aortic root [7]. Thus, congenital defects potenti­ating these pressure forces can lead to develop­ment of a SOVA [1]. SOVA is either congenital or acquired. Whether congenital or acquired, SOVA is a consequence of weakness of the elastic lam­ina at the junction of the aortic media and the annulus brosis [8]. Congenital ones are seen in connective tissue disorders such as Marfan syn­drome [9] or Ehlers-Danlos syndrome [1014]. Also, there are several congenital defects com­monly associated with SOVA.For example, ven­tricular septal defects (VSDs), with or without aortic regurgitation have been reported in 12% and up to 78% of SOVA patients [15, 16], most commonly with aneurysm of right coronary sinus. Aortic valve abnormalities such as bicus­pid aortic valve has been reported in at least 10% of SOVA patients [9, 15].
On the other hand, acquired SOVAs are seen in patients who suffered abrupt deceleration trauma; infections such as bacterial endocarditis, syphilis, and even tuberculosis and degenerative diseases, such as cystic medial necrosis and ath­erosclerosis. Additionally, intense physical activ­ity can cause rupture of an existing SOVA [17].
SOVA arises from the right sinus of Valsalva in 80–85% cases, from the non-coronary sinus in 5–15%, and rarely from the left sinus [4]. This
Transcatheter Closure ofRuptured Sinus ofValsalva
https://t.me/med1917
311
notable difference in distribution is thought to be related to the role of outlet septum defects in the genesis of SOVAs. The right coronary cusp of aortic valve adjoins a big part of the outlet sep­tum, while left coronary cusp does not originate from the outlet septum [17].
Diagnosis andPre-procedural Assessment
A transthoracic Echocardiogram (TTE) was per­formed, and showed severe aortic regurgitation along with dilated left ventricle with preserved ventricular function. However, when the case was discussed at cardiac-cardiothoracic surgical meet­ing, possibility of ruptured sinus of Valsalva aneu­rysm (SOVA) was raised considering history and hyperdynamic precordium associated with con­tinuous murmur over the left lower sternal border.
Heart Team Approach, Discussion andDecision
As no denite diagnosis was agreed on, and after reviewing TTE images thoroughly, cardiac CT was done and conrmed the diagnosis of rup­tured right sinus of Valsalva to right atrium.
Surgical closure was suggested. However, we conducted extensive discussion with the patient, she was not in favor for a major open-heart sur­gery and she preferred transcatheter approach if feasible. The team decision was to proceed with diagnostic cardiac catheterization to obtain detailed imaging, with intraprocedural Transesophageal Echocardiogram (TEE) and close percutaneously if feasible.
Clinical Presentation
Unruptured SOVA
Usually asymptomatic, but occasionally, continu­ous murmur can be heard due to the ow in and out of the intact aneurysmal pouch [18]. Unruptured lesions can result in signicant arrhythmias including ventricular tachycardia, atrial brillation, and complete heart block through extension into the interventricular sep­tum and compression of the atrioventricular (AV) node and His bundle [18]. Cases of coronary artery compression secondary to compression of coronary ow by unruptured SOVA have been reported [19]. SOVA can uncommonly cause RVOT obstruction. Rarely (Fig.1), thrombus for­mation within the SOVA can lead to thromboem­bolic cerebrovascular accidents Fig.2 [20].
Fig. 1 Transesophageal echocardiogram in short axis view showing right sinus of Valsalva aneurysm (asterixis) protruding to the right ventricular outow tract. Aorta (AO), RA, right atrium; left atrium (LA); right ventricle (RV)
312
https://t.me/med1917
abc
Y. Hejazi et al.
Fig. 2 A 72-year-old female patient admitted with decompensated heart failure secondary to severe mitral regurgitation from an anterior leaet ail. Two years prior, she required pacemaker placement for complete heart block. The patient underwent surgical repair of the mitral valve. Intraoperative TEE did not reveal any apparent pathology on the mid-esophageal short-axis view of the aortic valve (a). However, further assessment of the sinus of Valsalva at the level of the annular plane (b) revealed a non-coronary SOVA with adherent mural thrombus (aster-
Ruptured SOVA
The anatomical location of a SOVA will deter­mine the clinical signicance and manifestations of aneurysm rupture. Right and noncoronary sinuses rupture leads to connection between the aorta and right ventricle outow tract or the aorta and the right atrium (RA). Left SOVA is more benign and results in connection between the left atrium and left ventricular outow tract [1].
SOVA can rupture at any age, but typically between 20 and 40 years of age. Clinical out­come is largely dependent on how fast the rupture occurs, in addition to the size of ruptured orice, and to which chamber the rupture occurs (receiv­ing chamber) [9]. The most common location for rupture is the right ventricle followed by the right atrium [21].
There are two distinct clinical scenarios for ruptured SOVA: acute rupture of large SOVA which manifests with severe substernal chest pain, upper abdominal pain or severe dyspnea with abrupt hemodynamic compromise [18]. Physical stress, blunt chest trauma, or iatrogenic trauma during percutaneous procedures are often preceding events. On the other hand, small and/or very gradual rupture presents insidiously. Patients will usually remain asymptomatic, and they may have mild dyspnea prior to progression to heart
isk) (c). A 52-year-old male patient admitted with an infe­rior ST elevation myocardial infarction. Mid-esophageal short-axis view on TEE demonstrated a large right SOVA (asterisk) with severe adherent mural thrombus (arrows in panel c). With permission from Xu B, Kocyigit D, Betancor J, Tan C, Rodriguez ER, Schoenhagen P, Flamm SD, Rodriguez LL, Svensson LG, Grifn BP. Sinus of Valsalva Aneurysms: A State-of-the-Art Imaging Review. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2020, Elsevier
failure. Sudden cardiac death can result from tamponade, ischemia, arrhythmia and/or conduc­tion issues [22].
The right ventricle receives around 75% of ruptured right SOVAs (Fig.3). Unruptured right coronary SOVAs often protrude into right ven­tricular outow tract resulting in obstruction. These lesions may distort pulmonary valve and cause pulmonic and tricuspid regurgitation [18]. Most noncoronary SOVAs rupture into right atrium.
Diagnostic Evaluation
Both ruptured and unruptured SOVAs have non­specic clinical presentation. As shown in our case, clinical presentation and even initial diag­nostic evaluation may not easily lead to proper diagnosis. Therefore, multi-modality imaging is of crucial role in establishing precise diagnosis and guiding management.
CXR
On frontal lm, SOVA may manifest as bulging of the aorta to the right of caval shadow. Ruptured
Transcatheter Closure ofRuptured Sinus ofValsalva
https://t.me/med1917
313
Fig. 3 Schematic gure demonstrating the different aor­tic sinuses that could be affected by SOVA and anatomical relation to the cardiac chambers in projected SOVA or rupture. Note to the noncoronary sinus which is related to both LA and RA although mostly ruptures to the RA and the right sinus of Valsalva which is related to the RA and RV although mostly ruptures to the RV. L left coronary;
SOVA can result in enlarged cardiac silhouette, pulmonary plethora and pulmonary venous hypertension.
Transthoracic Echocardiogram (TTE)
Aortic root can be adequately imaged and evalu­ated by TTE.Parasternal long-axis, modied api­cal ve chamber and three chamber views provide accurate assessment and measurements of aortic root [23]. As per American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) guidelines, it is recom­mended to measure SOVA diameter perpendicular to the long axis of the ascending aorta in the para­sternal long axis view at end diastole using the leading edge–to–leading-edge method [23]. A single-center study comparing TTE and surgical ndings in 212 patients with SOVAs undergoing surgery has shown that the sensitivity, specicity, and accuracy of TTE for diagnosing SOVAs were
LA left atrium; LAA left atrial appendage; NC coronary cusp; R right coronary; RA right atrium; RAA right atrial appendage; RVOT right ventricular outow tract; SOVA sinus of Valsalva aneurysm. With permission from Xu B, etal. Sinus of Valsalva Aneurysms: A State­of- the-Art Imaging Review. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2020, Elsevier
non-
93.9%, 99.9%, and 99.8%, respectively [23]. In ruptured SOVAs, color Doppler images would show a continuous turbulent ow between the ruptured sinus and the receiving chamber (Fig.4). A signicant diastolic ow reversal is usually seen in the aorta. If the rupture involves a large part of the SOVA, a “windsock” deformity may be noted, which indicates a large, ruptured sinus expanding and contracting through the cardiac cycle. Differentiating isolated SOVA rupture from SOVA rupture with VSD is a diagnostic challenge. If the aneurysm or the prolapsing cusp of the aortic valve occludes it, VSD may be missed [24]. Cheng etal. have suggested that the short-axis view should be checked to differenti­ate the relatively thin-walled and brous SOVA or prolapsed cusp from the thicker myocardial wall to avoid a misdiagnosis [24]. Another com­mon diagnostic challenge when there is coexist-
314
https://t.me/med1917
Fig. 4 Continuous wave Doppler study (left panel) and color M-mode Doppler study (right panel) showing continuous ow from ruptured right sinus of Valsalva to the right ventricle
Y. Hejazi et al.
ing aortic regurgitation. The diastolic aortic regurgitant ow and systolic VSD jet may create a Doppler ow jet similar to a ruptured SOVA, even in the absence of rupture. In such scenarios, the Doppler waveform patterns would be helpful in differentiating the two anomalies. SOVA shunt rupture begins in mid diastole and gradually increases toward end diastole. Aortic regurgita­tion, if present, usually begins in early diastole and continues throughout the diastole in a decre­scendo fashion [25] (Fig.3).
Transesophageal Echocardiography (TEE)
Aortic valve, aortic root and ascending aorta can be evaluated with high resolution images through mid-esophageal long axis (120–150) and short axis (at 30–60) views (Figs.5 and 6). Relationship between the aneurysm and right ventricle, aortic valve cusps and coronary arteries can be pre­cisely assessed by long and short axis imaging [23]. It may be necessary to use off axis views and to advance the probe away from the aortic root toward the annular plane. Doppler studies in both TTE and TEE are helpful in diagnosis of associated cardiac abnormalities and/or potential complications of SOVAs such as rupture, aortic regurgitation, compressive effects on cardiac structures, and thrombus or vegetations. TEE is the diagnostic modality of choice during inter­ventional procedures for SOVAs. One should keep in mind; TEE is semi-invasive procedure.
However, for adults with poor images, TEE pro­vides improved image quality. 3D imaging can add valuable diagnostic information in regard to size, location of SOVAs and their relationship to adjacent structures. Real time 3D TEE is increas­ingly being used to guide the percutaneous clo­sure of SOVAs. It helps in selecting appropriate devices and also avoiding procedure related com­plications, such as device embolization, signi­cant residual shunting, and obstruction of an adjacent cardiac chamber [26].
Multi Detector Computed Tomography (MDCT)
MDCT is becoming an essential diagnostic modality in cardiovascular imaging especially because of continuous improvement in spatial and temporal resolution. It can provide valuable additional information, such as evaluation of cor­onary arteries, entire thoracic aorta, SOV diame­ter, SOVA or rupture and related chambers, dynamic assessment of aortic valve motion, quantication of left ventricle (LV) ejection frac­tion, and post processing (e.g., volume render­ing) [27]. Typically, the wall of the aortic root or ascending aorta aneurysms is not thickened and measures around 1mm [23].
Evaluation of SOV diameters can be done by two methods: sinus-to-sinus and sinus-to­commissure on MDCT/CMR.
In both methods SOV diameters measurement is based on the inner to inner edges in double-
Transcatheter Closure ofRuptured Sinus ofValsalva
https://t.me/med1917
315
Fig. 5 TEE mid esophageal long axis views showing rup­ture of right SOVA without associated ventricular septal defect (VSD) (left panel) and rupture of right SOVA asso-
Fig. 6 Rupture of right sinus of Valsalva to right atrium just above tricuspid valve illustrated by continuous turbulent ow (white arrow)
oblique technique with the planes parallel to the aortic annular and perpendicular to the long axis of the proximal ascending Ao (Fig.7).
Based on 2015 Guidelines for Multimodality Imaging of Diseases of the Thoracic Aorta in Adults, sinus to sinus measurement in end dias­tole is the recommended method to measure aor­tic sinuses [28]. These measurements are averaged if sinuses are symmetric, and reported individually if sinuses are not symmetric. Recent recommendations by The Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography in
ciated with VSD (right panel). Note that VSD is below the aortic valve and rupture of SOVA is above aortic annulus
Transcatheter Aortic Valve implantation/replace­ment (TAVI/TAVR) suggested sinus-to­commissure method which means measuring from the commissure to the opposite sinus. This method generally results in 2mm smaller SOV mean diameter compared to the sinus-to-sinus method [29]. The typical SOVA can be seen on CT as thin walled-out pouching in proximity to the wall of aorta. If disconnected from the aortic wall, once should suspect ruptured SOVA [27]. The main disadvantages of MDCT are radiation exposure, low temporal resolution, and lack of