Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_3737_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана
.pdf
306
https://t.me/med1917
might happen because of the dilated coronary
artery at proximal to stula and low ow state.
Key Points
– Coronary-cameral stulas (CCFs) as a
subset of coronary artery stulas (CAFs)
are abnormal communication between
coronary arteries and cardiac
chambers.
– The most common CAFs originate from
the right coronary system and drain the
right ventricle or right atrium.
– 2D and color Doppler study by transtho-
racic echocardiography is valuable by
demonstrating the dilated coronary
artery at origin and high velocity con-
A. Sadeghpour et al.
tinuous turbulent ow at the site of termination of the CCFs.
– Cardiac CT angiography is the pre-
procedural planning imaging modality
that dening the stula’s origin, size,
anatomic course, and termination site.
– In properly selected patients with symp-
tomatic medium or large-size CAFs,
transcatheter closure is an effective and
safe alternative procedure to surgery
with reported complete occlusion of
80–95% considering that heart team
approach is highly recommended.
Imaging study Benets Disadvantages
Echocardiogram
CT
CMR
– Screening tool providing the hemodynamic effect of CAFs (the
size and function of the cardiac chambers), regional wall motion
abnormality, valvular insufciency secondary to papillary
muscle dysfunction, and visualizing the dilated stulous course.
Color ow imaging (CFI) showing high velocity continuous
turbulent ow at the site of termination of the CCFs.
– Echocardiogram could demonstrate concomitant congenital
anomalies
– No radiation
– ECG-gated CT angiography and 3D volume-rendered imaging
are preferred pre-procedural planning imaging modality by
providing a precise delineation of the origin, course, and
drainage site of CAFs.
– CT is helpful in choosing appropriate treatment approach
(surgical or transcatheter closure [TCC]) and device selection
and nding the optimal uoroscopic angles.
– Additionally it is helpful in the evaluation of the presence of
other intrathoracic vascular communications or associated
congenital anomalies
– Provides with the cardiac chambers, accurate ventricular
function, shunt ow assessment (Qp:Qs), and associated
anomalies
– No radiation.
– valuable for the anatomic and hemodynamic assessment of
CAFs, and myocardial perfusion imaging can be added for
evaluating the CCFs related ischemia
– Limited value for
providing detail
anatomy and
course of coronary
arteries [28]
– Radiation exposure
– Risk of iodinated
contrast
nephropathy
– Needs patient’s
cooperation and
sometimes deep
sedation
– Sub optimal
imaging in the
setting of
arrhythmias or
irregular heart rate

Coronary Cameral Fistula Closure
https://t.me/med1917
307
Disclosures There are no conicts of interest to disclose.
Chapter Review Questions
1. A 43-year-old man with a continuous murmur
underwent transthoracic echocardiography.
He had a possible diagnosis of LAD to the
right ventricle coronary cameral stula (CCF).
Which of the following ndings are NOT consistent with the diagnosis of CCF:
A. Ischemic chest pain
B. Cardiac chamber enlargement
C. Left ventricular systolic dysfunction
D. Cyanosis
Answer: D
Explanation: Sizable stulas may result in
signicant left to right shunt and causing cardiac chamber dilatation or myocardial ischemia distal to coronary stula due to steal
phenomenon and consequently left ventricular dysfunction.
2. A 55-year-old woman with typical ischemic
chest pain and past medical history of MVR
was diagnosed with sizable coronary cameral
stulas (CCF). The proximal diameter of the
feeding coronary artery was 10 mm. She
underwent transcatheter closure of the CCFs
based on the heart team’s decision. The patient
complained of chest pain before discharge.
Which of the following is the most possible
diagnosis in this patient:
A. Coil embolization
B. Myocardial infarction due to thrombus
formation
C. Mitral prostheses malfunction due to
interference of prostheses with the CCF’s
occluder
D. It is a normal nding after CCFs closure
with no clinical signicanceAnswer: B
Explanation: Although complications are
rare in properly selected patients for CCF
transcatheter closure, we should be aware that
coil embolization, transient T-wave abnormality or bundle branch block, and myocardial
infarction might happen. An enlarged proximal coronary artery with a diameter ≥10mm
has a higher risk of thromboses and myocardial infarction after closure.
3. The most common type of coronary artery stulas (CAFs) are:
A. RCA origin draining into the RA or RV
B. LCX origin draining into the LA or LV
C. LAD origin draining in to the RV
D. LCX draining into the RV
Answer: A
Explanation: The most common type of
CAF’s originates from the right coronary system and drains the right ventricle or right
atrium.
4. Which cardiac imaging is recommended for
the preprocedural evaluation of a patient with
a suspected coronary cameral stula (CCF)?
A. 2D transthoracic echocardiography (TTE)
is adequate for preprocedural planning.
B. Cardiac MRI is more valuable than car-
diac CT in identifying the whole course of
the coronary anatomy and is preferred for
preprocedural planning, with the added
benet of lack of radiation exposure for
the patient.
C. Transesophageal echocardiogram with 3D
imaging of the CCF origin is preferred for
pre-procedural planning.
D. Cardiac CT is the preferred imaging
modality for pre-procedural
planning.Answer: D
Explanation: Cardiac CT is the preferred
imaging modality for pre-procedural
planning.
Initial identication of CCF’s is best made
by TTE to evaluate the etiology and site of termination of high-velocity continuous ow of
CCF’s. Preprocedural planning however
requires a more comprehensive evaluation of
the course of the CCF as can be obtained from
the CT.
Answer B is not correct. Cardiac MRI provides excellent visualization of the proximal
course of the CCF but is not adequate for
comprehensive pre-procedural planning.TEE
imaging may identify the proximal blood ow
into CCF with the opportunity to visualize the
termination on color ow imaging, but is
inadequate for pre-procedural planning.

308
https://t.me/med1917
A. Sadeghpour et al.
References
1. Lim JJ, Jung JI, Lee BY, Lee HG. Prevalence and
types of coronary artery stulas detected with
coronary CT angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol.
2014;203(3):W237–43.
2. Kim MS, Jung JI, Chun HJ.Coronary to pulmonary
artery stula: morphologic features at multidetector CT. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010;26(suppl
2):273–80.
3. Mavroudis C, Backer CL, Rocchini AP, Muster AJ,
Gevitz M.Coronary artery stulas in infants and children: a surgical review and discussion of coil embolization. Ann Thorac Surg. 1997;63:1235–42.
4. Challoumas D, Pericleous A, Dimitrakaki IA,
Danelatos C, Dimitrakakis G. Coronary arteriovenous stulae: a review. Int J Angiol. 2014;23(1):1–10.
https://doi.org/10.1055/s- 0033- 1349162.
5. Gillebert C, Van Hoof R, Van De Werf F, Piessens J,
De Geest H.Coronary artery stulas in an adult population. Eur Heart J. 1986;7(5):437–43.
6. Fernandes ED, Kadivar H, Hallman GL, Reul GJ, Ott
DA, Cooley DA. Congenital malformations of the
coronary arteries: the Texas Heart Institute experience. Ann Thorac Surg. 1992;54:732–40.
7. Sakakibara S, Yokoyama M, Takao A, Nogi M, Gomi
H. Coronary arteriovenous stula: nine operated
cases. Am Heart J. 1966;72:307–14.
8. Latson LA.Coronary artery stulas: how to manage
them. Cathet Cardiov Interv. 2007;70(1):110–6.
9. Said SA, Van Der Werf T. Dutch survey of coronary
artery stulas in adults: congenital solitary stulas. Int
J Cardiol. 2006;106(3):323–32.
10. Ata Y, Turk T, Bicer M, Yalcin M, Ata F, Yavuz
S.Coronary arteriovenous stulas in the adults: natural history and management strategies. J Cardiothorac
Surg. 2009;4(1):62.
11. Dodge-Khatami A, Mavroudis C, Backer
CL.Congenital heart surgery nomenclature and database project: anomalies of the coronary arteries. Ann
Thorac Surg. 2000;69(3 Suppl 1):270–7.
12. Moe TG.The multidisciplinary heart team approach
to management of coronary artery stula with the
assistance of 3D image reconstruction*. JACC Case
Rep. 2020;2(11):1739–41.
13. Valente AM, Lock JE, Gauvreau K, etal. Predictors of
long-term adverse outcomes in patients with congenital coronary artery stulae. Circ Cardiovasc Interv.
2010;3(2):134–9.
14. Warnes CA, Williams RG, Bashore TM, etal. ACC/
AHA 2008 guidelines for the management of adults
with congenital heart disease: executive summary—
a report of the American College of Cardiology/
American Heart Association Task Force on practice
guidelines (Writing committee to develop guidelines
for the management of adults with congenital heart
disease). Circulation. 2008;118(23):2395–451. 67.
15. Stout KK, Daniels CJ, Aboulhosn JA, etal. 2018 AHA/
ACC guideline for the management of adults with
congenital heart disease: executive summary: a report
of the American College of Cardiology/American
Heart Association Task Force on clinical practice
guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;73:1494–563.
16. Buccheri D, Chirco PR, Geraci S, Caramanno
G, Cortese B. Coronary artery stulae: anatomy,
diagnosis and management strategies. Heart Lung
Circ. 2018;27(8):940–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
hlc.2017.07.014.
17. Al-Hijji M, El Sabbagh A, El Hajj S, AlKhouli M, El
Sabawi B, Cabalka A, etal. Coronary artery stulas:
indications, techniques, outcomes, and complications
of transcatheter stula closure. J Am Coll Cardiol
Intv. 2021;14(13):1393–406.
18. Boyle S, Jesuthasan LSB, Jenkins C, Challa P, Ranjan
S, Dahiya A.Coronary-cameral stula. Circ Cardiov
Imaging. 2019;12(5):e008691.
19. Kamiya H, Yasuda T, Nagamine H, et al. Surgical
treatment of congenital coronary artery stulas: 27
years’ experience and a review of the literature. J Card
Surg. 2002;17:173–7.
20. Dimitrakakis G, Otto von Oppell U. eComment: surgical treatment of coronary arteriovenous stulas.
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2011;13:674–5.
21. Wang S, Wu Q, Hu S, etal. Surgical treatment of 52
patients with congenital coronary artery stulas. Chin
Med J. 2001;114(7):752–5.
22. Cheung DL, Au WK, Cheung HH, Chiu CS, Lee
WT.Coronary artery stulas: long-term results of surgical correction. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;71(1):190–5.
23. Carrel T, Tkebuchava T, Jenni R, Arbenz U, Turina
M.Congenital coronary stulas in children and adults:
diagnosis, surgical technique and results. Cardiology.
1996;87:325–30.
24. Goto Y, Abe T, Sekine S, Iijimaa K, Kondoha K,
Sakurada T.Surgical treatment of the coronary artery
to pulmonary artery stulas in adults. Cardiology.
1998;89:252–6.
25. Firouzi A, Alemzadeh-Ansari MJ, Mohebbi B,
Khajali Z, Khalilipur E, Baay M, Bayatian A,
Taherian M, Khosropour A, Hosseini Z. Diverse
transcatheter closure strategies in coronary artery stulas a state-of-the-art approach. Curr Probl Cardiol.
2021;47:101010.
26. Qureshi SA. Coronary arterial stulas.
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2006;1(1):51. https://doi.
org/10.1186/1750- 1172- 1- 51.
27. Ilkay E, Celebi OO, Kacmaz F, et al. Percutaneous
closure of coronary artery stula: long-term follow- up results. Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej.
2015;11:318–22.
28. Frommelt P, Lopez L, Dimas VV, Eidem B, Han
BK, Ko HH, Lorber R, Nii M, Printz B, Srivastava
S, Valente AM, Cohen MS. Recommendations for
multimodality assessment of congenital coronary
anomalies: a guide from the American Society of
Echocardiography: developed in collaboration with
the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and
Interventions, Japanese Society of Echocardiography,
and Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2020;33(3):259–94. https://
doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2019.10.011.

Transcatheter Closure ofRuptured
https://t.me/med1917
Sinus ofValsalva
Y.Hejazi, Z.M.Hijazi, andA.Sadeghpour
Abstract
Sinus of Valsalva Aneurysm (SOVA) typically
is caused by congenital weakness in the aortic
wall of one of three aortic sinuses (most commonly right) and resulting in outpouching protrusion into nearby cardiac chambers. Men are
more affected (4:1), and there is a higher
reported incidence in Asian groups. SOVA is
either congenital or acquired. Congenital ones
are seen in connective tissue disorders and in
some forms of congenital heart diseases, like
ventricular septal defects (VSDs) and bicuspid aortic valve. Most of these defects are
asymptomatic. Acquired SOVAs are seen in
patients who suffered abrupt deceleration
trauma; infections such as bacterial endocar-
the disease has poor prognosis. Multi-modality
imaging plays crucial role in detecting this
rare disease and in guiding management.
Surgery has been traditionally the treatment of
choice. However, several studies reported
safety and efcacy of transcatheter treatment.
In this chapter, we will discuss multiple imaging modalities implemented in diagnosis and
transcatheter treatment of ruptured SOVAs,
and briey compare surgical and transcatheter
treatments approach.
Keywords
Structural heart · Sinus of Valsalva · Ruptured
· Multimodality imaging · Transcatheter
closure
ditis, syphilis, and even tuberculosis and
degenerative diseases. Though rare, rupture
and stulous connections with one of the adjacent cardiac chambers will give signs and
symptoms of heart failure. If left untreated,
Test your learning and check your under-
standing of this book’s contents: use the
“Springer Nature Flashcards” app to
access questions using ▶ https://sn.pub/
Y. Hejazi
Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Sidra
Medicine & Weill Cornell Medicine, Doha, Qatar
Z. M. Hijazi (*)
Weill Cornell Medicine, Sidra Medicine, Doha, Qatar
e-mail: zhijazi@sidra.org
A. Sadeghpour
Advanced Cardiovascular Imaging, MedStar Health
Research Institute, Georgetown University,
Washington, DC, USA
e-mail: anita.sadeghpour@medstar.net
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2024
A. M. Kelsey et al. (eds.), Cardiac Imaging in Structural Heart Disease Interventions,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50740-3_13
ambACS.
To use the app, please follow the instruc-
tions in the chapter “Transcatheter
Aortic Valve Replacement.”
309

310
https://t.me/med1917
Y. Hejazi et al.
Learning Objectives
1. To draw cardiologists’ attention to sinus of
Valsalva aneurysm, an uncommon disease,
which can present with nonspecic signs and
symptoms, and can be easily misdiagnosed
2. To review pre-procedural multi-modality
imaging modalities in the evaluation of ruptured sinus of Valsalva
3. Review intra procedural imaging which plays
an important role in successful transcatheter
closure of ruptured SOVA
4. Briey compare surgical vs transcatheter
approach for ruptured SOVA
Case Study
36-year-old female patient was referred to
cardiology clinic for evaluation of signs
and symptoms of heart failure. She was
complaining of exertional dyspnea, easy
fatigability, palpitations and atypical chest
pain for around 6 months. Physical exam
was remarkable for hyperdynamic precordium, grade III continuous murmur over
the left lower sternal border. ECG: sinus
rhythm, non-specic intraventricular conduction delay, LVH, and no ischemic
changes.
Background andDenitions
The sinuses of Valsalva can be identied as small
dilatations in the aortic wall just above each cusp
of the aortic valve, precisely between the annulus
and Sino tubular (ST) junction. They allow aortic
valve opening during systole without occlusion
of coronary artery ostia [1]. Defect in aortic wall
resulting in outpouching protrusion into nearby
cardiac chambers is known as Sinus of Valsalva
Aneurysm (SOVA). SOVA was rst described by
Hope in 1839. Edward and Burchell’s reported
that SOVAs are secondary to failure of the aortic
media to fuse with the heart during prenatal
development. The estimated incidence varies
between 0.09 up to 0.96% [2–5]. Ethnicity plays
an important role in this variable incidence. Chue
etal. [6] reported ve times higher incidence of
ruptured SOVA (RSOVA) in Far Eastern patients
than in Westerns.
SOVAs comprise 0.1–3.5% of all congenital
cardiac defects [1]. Typically, men are more
affected (4:1), and there is a higher reported incidence in Asian groups. Most of these defects are
asymptomatic. However, rupture and stulous
connections with one of the adjacent cardiac
chambers will give signs and symptoms of heart
failure. If ruptured SOVAs remain untreated, the
prognosis is poor, with a life expectancy of 1-year
[1].
Causes andPathophysiology
Embryologically, SOVA forms rst as a blind
diverticulum secondary to pressure forces on the
aortic root [7]. Thus, congenital defects potentiating these pressure forces can lead to development of a SOVA [1]. SOVA is either congenital or
acquired. Whether congenital or acquired, SOVA
is a consequence of weakness of the elastic lamina at the junction of the aortic media and the
annulus brosis [8]. Congenital ones are seen in
connective tissue disorders such as Marfan syndrome [9] or Ehlers-Danlos syndrome [10–14].
Also, there are several congenital defects commonly associated with SOVA.For example, ventricular septal defects (VSDs), with or without
aortic regurgitation have been reported in 12%
and up to 78% of SOVA patients [15, 16], most
commonly with aneurysm of right coronary
sinus. Aortic valve abnormalities such as bicuspid aortic valve has been reported in at least 10%
of SOVA patients [9, 15].
On the other hand, acquired SOVAs are seen
in patients who suffered abrupt deceleration
trauma; infections such as bacterial endocarditis,
syphilis, and even tuberculosis and degenerative
diseases, such as cystic medial necrosis and atherosclerosis. Additionally, intense physical activity can cause rupture of an existing SOVA [17].
SOVA arises from the right sinus of Valsalva
in 80–85% cases, from the non-coronary sinus in
5–15%, and rarely from the left sinus [4]. This

Transcatheter Closure ofRuptured Sinus ofValsalva
https://t.me/med1917
311
notable difference in distribution is thought to be
related to the role of outlet septum defects in the
genesis of SOVAs. The right coronary cusp of
aortic valve adjoins a big part of the outlet septum, while left coronary cusp does not originate
from the outlet septum [17].
Diagnosis andPre-procedural
Assessment
A transthoracic Echocardiogram (TTE) was performed, and showed severe aortic regurgitation
along with dilated left ventricle with preserved
ventricular function. However, when the case was
discussed at cardiac-cardiothoracic surgical meeting, possibility of ruptured sinus of Valsalva aneurysm (SOVA) was raised considering history and
hyperdynamic precordium associated with continuous murmur over the left lower sternal border.
Heart Team Approach, Discussion
andDecision
As no denite diagnosis was agreed on, and after
reviewing TTE images thoroughly, cardiac CT
was done and conrmed the diagnosis of ruptured right sinus of Valsalva to right atrium.
Surgical closure was suggested. However, we
conducted extensive discussion with the patient,
she was not in favor for a major open-heart surgery and she preferred transcatheter approach if
feasible. The team decision was to proceed with
diagnostic cardiac catheterization to obtain
detailed imaging, with intraprocedural
Transesophageal Echocardiogram (TEE) and
close percutaneously if feasible.
Clinical Presentation
Unruptured SOVA
Usually asymptomatic, but occasionally, continuous murmur can be heard due to the ow in and
out of the intact aneurysmal pouch [18].
Unruptured lesions can result in signicant
arrhythmias including ventricular tachycardia,
atrial brillation, and complete heart block
through extension into the interventricular septum and compression of the atrioventricular (AV)
node and His bundle [18]. Cases of coronary
artery compression secondary to compression of
coronary ow by unruptured SOVA have been
reported [19]. SOVA can uncommonly cause
RVOT obstruction. Rarely (Fig.1), thrombus formation within the SOVA can lead to thromboembolic cerebrovascular accidents Fig.2 [20].
Fig. 1 Transesophageal
echocardiogram in short
axis view showing right
sinus of Valsalva
aneurysm (asterixis)
protruding to the right
ventricular outow tract.
Aorta (AO), RA, right
atrium; left atrium (LA);
right ventricle (RV)

312
https://t.me/med1917
abc
Y. Hejazi et al.
Fig. 2 A 72-year-old female patient admitted with
decompensated heart failure secondary to severe mitral
regurgitation from an anterior leaet ail. Two years prior,
she required pacemaker placement for complete heart
block. The patient underwent surgical repair of the mitral
valve. Intraoperative TEE did not reveal any apparent
pathology on the mid-esophageal short-axis view of the
aortic valve (a). However, further assessment of the sinus
of Valsalva at the level of the annular plane (b) revealed a
non-coronary SOVA with adherent mural thrombus (aster-
Ruptured SOVA
The anatomical location of a SOVA will determine the clinical signicance and manifestations
of aneurysm rupture. Right and noncoronary
sinuses rupture leads to connection between the
aorta and right ventricle outow tract or the aorta
and the right atrium (RA). Left SOVA is more
benign and results in connection between the left
atrium and left ventricular outow tract [1].
SOVA can rupture at any age, but typically
between 20 and 40 years of age. Clinical outcome is largely dependent on how fast the rupture
occurs, in addition to the size of ruptured orice,
and to which chamber the rupture occurs (receiving chamber) [9]. The most common location for
rupture is the right ventricle followed by the right
atrium [21].
There are two distinct clinical scenarios for
ruptured SOVA: acute rupture of large SOVA
which manifests with severe substernal chest
pain, upper abdominal pain or severe dyspnea
with abrupt hemodynamic compromise [18].
Physical stress, blunt chest trauma, or iatrogenic
trauma during percutaneous procedures are often
preceding events. On the other hand, small and/or
very gradual rupture presents insidiously. Patients
will usually remain asymptomatic, and they may
have mild dyspnea prior to progression to heart
isk) (c). A 52-year-old male patient admitted with an inferior ST elevation myocardial infarction. Mid-esophageal
short-axis view on TEE demonstrated a large right SOVA
(asterisk) with severe adherent mural thrombus (arrows in
panel c). With permission from Xu B, Kocyigit D,
Betancor J, Tan C, Rodriguez ER, Schoenhagen P, Flamm
SD, Rodriguez LL, Svensson LG, Grifn BP. Sinus of
Valsalva Aneurysms: A State-of-the-Art Imaging Review.
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2020, Elsevier
failure. Sudden cardiac death can result from
tamponade, ischemia, arrhythmia and/or conduction issues [22].
The right ventricle receives around 75% of
ruptured right SOVAs (Fig.3). Unruptured right
coronary SOVAs often protrude into right ventricular outow tract resulting in obstruction.
These lesions may distort pulmonary valve and
cause pulmonic and tricuspid regurgitation [18].
Most noncoronary SOVAs rupture into right
atrium.
Diagnostic Evaluation
Both ruptured and unruptured SOVAs have nonspecic clinical presentation. As shown in our
case, clinical presentation and even initial diagnostic evaluation may not easily lead to proper
diagnosis. Therefore, multi-modality imaging is
of crucial role in establishing precise diagnosis
and guiding management.
CXR
On frontal lm, SOVA may manifest as bulging
of the aorta to the right of caval shadow. Ruptured

Transcatheter Closure ofRuptured Sinus ofValsalva
https://t.me/med1917
313
Fig. 3 Schematic gure demonstrating the different aortic sinuses that could be affected by SOVA and anatomical
relation to the cardiac chambers in projected SOVA or
rupture. Note to the noncoronary sinus which is related to
both LA and RA although mostly ruptures to the RA and
the right sinus of Valsalva which is related to the RA and
RV although mostly ruptures to the RV. L left coronary;
SOVA can result in enlarged cardiac silhouette,
pulmonary plethora and pulmonary venous
hypertension.
Transthoracic Echocardiogram (TTE)
Aortic root can be adequately imaged and evaluated by TTE.Parasternal long-axis, modied apical ve chamber and three chamber views provide
accurate assessment and measurements of aortic
root [23]. As per American Society of
Echocardiography (ASE) guidelines, it is recommended to measure SOVA diameter perpendicular
to the long axis of the ascending aorta in the parasternal long axis view at end diastole using the
leading edge–to–leading-edge method [23]. A
single-center study comparing TTE and surgical
ndings in 212 patients with SOVAs undergoing
surgery has shown that the sensitivity, specicity,
and accuracy of TTE for diagnosing SOVAs were
LA left atrium; LAA left atrial appendage; NC
coronary cusp; R right coronary; RA right atrium; RAA
right atrial appendage; RVOT right ventricular outow
tract; SOVA sinus of Valsalva aneurysm. With permission
from Xu B, etal. Sinus of Valsalva Aneurysms: A Stateof- the-Art Imaging Review. J Am Soc Echocardiogr.
2020, Elsevier
non-
93.9%, 99.9%, and 99.8%, respectively [23]. In
ruptured SOVAs, color Doppler images would
show a continuous turbulent ow between the
ruptured sinus and the receiving chamber (Fig.4).
A signicant diastolic ow reversal is usually
seen in the aorta. If the rupture involves a large
part of the SOVA, a “windsock” deformity may
be noted, which indicates a large, ruptured sinus
expanding and contracting through the cardiac
cycle. Differentiating isolated SOVA rupture
from SOVA rupture with VSD is a diagnostic
challenge. If the aneurysm or the prolapsing cusp
of the aortic valve occludes it, VSD may be
missed [24]. Cheng etal. have suggested that the
short-axis view should be checked to differentiate the relatively thin-walled and brous SOVA
or prolapsed cusp from the thicker myocardial
wall to avoid a misdiagnosis [24]. Another common diagnostic challenge when there is coexist-

314
https://t.me/med1917
Fig. 4 Continuous wave Doppler study (left panel) and color M-mode Doppler study (right panel) showing continuous
ow from ruptured right sinus of Valsalva to the right ventricle
Y. Hejazi et al.
ing aortic regurgitation. The diastolic aortic
regurgitant ow and systolic VSD jet may create
a Doppler ow jet similar to a ruptured SOVA,
even in the absence of rupture. In such scenarios,
the Doppler waveform patterns would be helpful
in differentiating the two anomalies. SOVA shunt
rupture begins in mid diastole and gradually
increases toward end diastole. Aortic regurgitation, if present, usually begins in early diastole
and continues throughout the diastole in a decrescendo fashion [25] (Fig.3).
Transesophageal Echocardiography
(TEE)
Aortic valve, aortic root and ascending aorta can
be evaluated with high resolution images through
mid-esophageal long axis (120–150) and short
axis (at 30–60) views (Figs.5 and 6). Relationship
between the aneurysm and right ventricle, aortic
valve cusps and coronary arteries can be precisely assessed by long and short axis imaging
[23]. It may be necessary to use off axis views
and to advance the probe away from the aortic
root toward the annular plane. Doppler studies in
both TTE and TEE are helpful in diagnosis of
associated cardiac abnormalities and/or potential
complications of SOVAs such as rupture, aortic
regurgitation, compressive effects on cardiac
structures, and thrombus or vegetations. TEE is
the diagnostic modality of choice during interventional procedures for SOVAs. One should
keep in mind; TEE is semi-invasive procedure.
However, for adults with poor images, TEE provides improved image quality. 3D imaging can
add valuable diagnostic information in regard to
size, location of SOVAs and their relationship to
adjacent structures. Real time 3D TEE is increasingly being used to guide the percutaneous closure of SOVAs. It helps in selecting appropriate
devices and also avoiding procedure related complications, such as device embolization, signicant residual shunting, and obstruction of an
adjacent cardiac chamber [26].
Multi Detector Computed Tomography
(MDCT)
MDCT is becoming an essential diagnostic
modality in cardiovascular imaging especially
because of continuous improvement in spatial
and temporal resolution. It can provide valuable
additional information, such as evaluation of coronary arteries, entire thoracic aorta, SOV diameter, SOVA or rupture and related chambers,
dynamic assessment of aortic valve motion,
quantication of left ventricle (LV) ejection fraction, and post processing (e.g., volume rendering) [27]. Typically, the wall of the aortic root or
ascending aorta aneurysms is not thickened and
measures around 1mm [23].
Evaluation of SOV diameters can be done by
two methods: sinus-to-sinus and sinus-tocommissure on MDCT/CMR.
In both methods SOV diameters measurement
is based on the inner to inner edges in double-

Transcatheter Closure ofRuptured Sinus ofValsalva
https://t.me/med1917
315
Fig. 5 TEE mid esophageal long axis views showing rupture of right SOVA without associated ventricular septal
defect (VSD) (left panel) and rupture of right SOVA asso-
Fig. 6 Rupture of right
sinus of Valsalva to right
atrium just above
tricuspid valve
illustrated by continuous
turbulent ow (white
arrow)
oblique technique with the planes parallel to the
aortic annular and perpendicular to the long axis
of the proximal ascending Ao (Fig.7).
Based on 2015 Guidelines for Multimodality
Imaging of Diseases of the Thoracic Aorta in
Adults, sinus to sinus measurement in end diastole is the recommended method to measure aortic sinuses [28]. These measurements are
averaged if sinuses are symmetric, and reported
individually if sinuses are not symmetric. Recent
recommendations by The Society of
Cardiovascular Computed Tomography in
ciated with VSD (right panel). Note that VSD is below the
aortic valve and rupture of SOVA is above aortic annulus
Transcatheter Aortic Valve implantation/replacement (TAVI/TAVR) suggested sinus-tocommissure method which means measuring
from the commissure to the opposite sinus. This
method generally results in 2mm smaller SOV
mean diameter compared to the sinus-to-sinus
method [29]. The typical SOVA can be seen on
CT as thin walled-out pouching in proximity to
the wall of aorta. If disconnected from the aortic
wall, once should suspect ruptured SOVA [27].
The main disadvantages of MDCT are radiation
exposure, low temporal resolution, and lack of
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
