Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_3735_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
27 Мб
Скачать
1 The Development oftheCoronary Arteries
https://t.me/medicina_free
15
Comment
The evidence from both developing human and murine embryos shows that the key stages of development of the coronary arteries take place during the transition from the embryonic to the foetal stages. It is at these stages, representing CSs 19 through 23in human development, and then continuing through the initial weeks of foe­tal development subsequent to 8weeks after fer­tilisation, that there is closure of the embryonic interventricular communication. This is com­bined with the transition during which the ventricular walls change to have predominantly compact rather trabeculated walls. The compara­ble changes in murine development take place during embryonic days 13.5 through 15.5. It is during these stages, furthermore, that the epicar­dial coronary arteries achieve their connection with the aortic root. Over the same period, the arterial circulation is developed with compact ventricular walls.
The manner of connection of the epicardial coronary arteries with the aortic root has long been controversial. The process was initially sug­gested to depend on the outgrowth of stems from the arterial roots. The stems, however, were alleged to sprout not only from the aortic sinuses, but also from the sinuses of the pulmonary root [25]. This notion was supplanted by the belief that the stems grew into the aortic root from the crown-like plexus formed within the middle part of the outow tract [6]. The evidence is now overwhelming that the stems do, indeed, bud out from the aortic component of the outow tract [7,
8, 19]. Our morphological evidence, however,
reveals that the stems grow out from walls of the intrapericardial aorta distal to the developing sinutubular junction. They can rst be recognised prior to any formation of the arterial valvar sinuses. Only with the ongoing formation of the sinuses are the arterial orices translocated to achieve their anticipated denitive positions proximal to the sinutubular junctions. Lack of such translocation provides an obvious explana­tion for the frequent nding of distal origin of the coronary arteries relative to the sinutubular junc­tion in otherwise normal hearts [26]. It is unlikely
to be coincidental, furthermore, that the high ori­gin of the left coronary artery is a frequent nd­ing in the setting of the aortic valve with two leaets [27]. These ndings point to an obvious relationship between maldevelopment of the arterial roots and abnormal origin of the coronary arteries. Further evidence in this regard is pro­vided by the association of origin of the left coro­nary artery from the pulmonary trunk with the persistence of the aortopulmonary foramen as an aortopulmonary window [28]. The latter nding then points to completion of separation of the intrapericardial trunks and arterial roots one from the other as underscoring appropriate budding of the coronary arterial stems. It has been suggested that this process might be guided by “aortic car­diomyocytes” [7]. This term, however, is a con­tradiction in itself. The walls of the arterial valvar sinuses contain smooth muscle cells, rather than cardiomyocytes. The aortic root does have myo­cardium incorporated at the bases of the two sinuses that give rise to the coronary arteries. This myocardium is formed by the so-called “myocardialisation” of the outow cushions. Its location at the bases of the aortic sinuses that usually give rise to the coronary arteries, none­theless, could, be inuential in determining the appropriate origin of the developing arterial stems. All three sinuses of the pulmonary root, however, are supported by comparable crescents of myocardium. Those arguing in favour of the role of “aortic cardiomyocytes” suggest that such cells are lacking in the pulmonary root [7]. This is manifestly not the case. The arterial stems, fur­thermore, originate distal to the myocardial bor­der. And, when rst formed, they take an intramural course through the adventitial linings of the developing sinusal walls. Abnormal devel­opment of the sinuses themselves, therefore, is more likely to be responsible for origin of one or other of the major coronary arteries from an inap­propriate valvar sinus. Further studies on the mechanism of formation of the sinusal walls, and the incorporation of the coronary arterial orices within the sinuses, will be required to resolve these issues.
The same goes for clarifying the morphogen-
esis of stulous communications between the
16
https://t.me/medicina_free
R. H. Anderson et al.
ventricular cavities and the epicardial coronary arteries. Such stulous communications can be found as isolated lesions [3]. Much more fre­quently they are found as complicating malfor­mations in the setting of hypoplasia of either the right or left ventricle when there is atresia of the arterial valve and an intact ventricular septum. When found in the setting of pulmonary atresia with an intact ventricular septum, the stulous communications are most frequent when there is a so-called “unipartite” arrangement of the cav­ity. This occurs when mural hypertrophy has overgrown the apical trabecular and outlet ven­tricular components [29]. The nding implies that the insult responsible for the pulmonary atre­sia occurred early in foetal development, but sub­sequent to closure of the embryonic interventricular communication. When found in the setting of hypoplastic left heart syndrome, in contrast, the stulous communications are found only in those phenotypes that include mitral ste­nosis rather than mitral atresia [30]. In both instances, nonetheless, the arrangements are sug­gestive that increased ventricular pressure is involved in creating the communications from the ventricular cavity, via the mural arterial circu­lation, to the epicardial coronary arteries, with the latter vessels then frequently becoming ectatic. Further investigations on the timing and mechanisms of formation of the mural arterial channels will be required to resolve these issues.
Acknowledgements Our study would not have been pos­sible without access to the Human Developmental Biology Resource, housed at Newcastle University. We express our thanks to all those who prepared the datasets and made them available for online evaluation. We are also indebted to the archivists of the Hamilton collection of human embryos, initially housed at Charing Cross Hospital Medical School, transferred to St George’s Medical University, but now maintained, along with the Boyd archive, at Cambridge University. Selected murine datasets are available for study in the website of the Crick Institute, London.
References
1. Rhee S, Chung JI, King DA, D’amato G, Paik DT, Duan A, Chang A, Nagelberg D, Sharma B, Jeong Y, Diehn M, Wu JC, Morrison AJ, Red-Horse K. Endothelial deletion of Ino80 disrupts coronary
angiogenesis and causes congenital heart disease. Nat Commun. 2018;9:368–84.
2. Anderson RH, Jensen B, Mohun TJ, Petersen SE, Aung N, Zemrak F, Planken RN, MacIver DH. Key questions relating to left ventricular noncompaction cardiomyopathy-is the emperor still wearing any clothes? Can J Cardiol. 2017;33:747–57.
3. Perez-Pomares JM, de la Pompa JL, Franco D, etal. Congenital coronary artery anomalies: a bridge from embryology to anatomy and pathophysiology—a position statement of the development, anatomy, and pathology ESC working group. Cardiovasc Res. 2016;109:204–16.
4. Ogden JA. The origin of coronary arteries [Abstr]. Circulation. 1988;38:150.
5. Folkman J, Haudenschild C. Angiogenesis in vitro. Nature. 1980;288:551–6.
6. Bogers AJJC, Gittenberger-de Groot A, Poelmann R, etal. Development of the origin of the coronary arter­ies, a matter of ingrowth or outgrowth? Anat Embryol (Berl). 1989;180:437–41.
7. Chen HI, Poduri A, Numi H, etal. VEGF-C and aortic cardiomyocytes guide coronary artery stem develop­ment. J Clin Invest. 2014;124:4899–914.
8. Spicer DE, Henderson DJ, Chaudhry B, Mohun TJ, Anderson RH.The anatomy and development of nor­mal and abnormal coronary arteries. Cardiol Young. 2015;25:1493–503.
9. Risau W, Flamme I. Vasculogenesis. Annu Rev Cell Biol Dev Biol. 1995;11:73–91.
10. Viragh S, Challice C.The origin of the epicardium and the embryonic myocardial circulation in the mouse. Anat Rec. 1981;201:157–68.
11. Poelmann R, Gittenberger-de Groot A, Mentink M, et al. Development of the cardiac coronary vascular endothelium, studied with antiendothelial antibodies, in chicken-quail chimeras. Circ Res. 1993;73:559–68.
12. Perez-Pomares JM, Macıas D, Garcıa-Garrido L, et al. The origin of the subepicardial mesenchyme in the avian embryo: an immunohistochemical and quailchick chimera study. Dev Biol. 1998;200:57–68.
13. Red-Horse K, Ueno H, Weissman IL, Krasnow M. Coronary arteries form by developmental repro­gramming of venous cells. Nature. 2010;464:549–53.
14. Katz TC, Singh MK, Degenhardt K, et al. Distinct compartments of the proepicardial organ give rise to coronary vascular endothelial cells. Dev Cell. 2012;22:639–50.
15. Wu B, Zhang Z, Lui W, et al. Endocardial cells form the coronary arteries by angiogenesis through myocardial-endocardial VEGF signaling. Cell. 2012;151:1083–96.
16. Tian X, Hu T, Zhang H, etal. De novo formation of a distinct coronary vascular population in neonatal heart. Science. 2014;345:90–4.
17. Arima Y, Miyagawa-Tomita S, Maeda K, etal. Preotic neural crest cells contribute to coronary artery smooth muscle involving endothelin signalling. Nat Commun. 2012;3:1267.
18. Mellgren AM, Smith CL, Olsen GS, et al. Platelet-derived growth factor receptor beta sig-
1 The Development oftheCoronary Arteries
https://t.me/medicina_free
17
naling is required for efcient epicardial cell migra­tion and development of two distinct coronary vascular smooth muscle cell populations. Circ Res. 2008;103:1393–401.
19. Theveniau-Ruissy M, Perez-Pomares JM, Parisot P, Baldini A, Miquerol L, Kelly RG.Coronary stem development in wild-type and Tbx1 null mouse hearts. Dev Dyn. 2016;245:445–59.
20. Ruiz-Villalba A, Ziogas A, Ehrbar M, Perez-Pomares JM. Characterization of epicardial derived car­diac interstitial cells: differentiation and mobili­zation of heart broblast progenitors. PLoS One. 2013;8:e53694.
21. Ruiz-Villalba A, Simon AM, Pogontke C, et al. Interacting resident epicardium-derived bro­blasts and recruited bone marrow cells form myocardial infarction scar. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;65:2057–66.
22. O'Rahilly R, Muller F. Developmental stages in human embryos: revised and new measurements. Cells Tissues Organs. 2010;192:73–84.
23. Anderson RH, Chaudhry B, Mohun TJ, Bamforth SD, Hoyland D, Phillips HM, Webb S, Moorman AF, Brown NA, Henderson DJ. Normal and abnormal development of the intrapericardial arterial trunks in humans and mice. Cardiovasc Res. 2012;95:108–15.
24. Kramer TC.The partitioning of the truncus and conus and the formation of the membranous portion of the interventricular septum in the human heart. Am J Anat. 1942;71:343–70.
25. Hackensellner HA.Aksessorische Kransgeffäsanlagen der Arteria pulmonalis unter 63 meschlichen Embyonenserien mit einer grössten Lange von 12 bis 36mm. Mikroscop Forschung. 1956;62:153–63.
26. Muriago M, Sheppard M, Ho S, Anderson R. The location of the coronary arterial orices in the normal heart. Clin Anat. 1997;10:1–6.
27. Lerer PK, Edwards WD.Coronary arterial anatomy in bicuspid aortic valve. Necropsy study of 100 hearts. Br Heart J. 1981;45:142–7.
28. Hlavacek A, Loukas M, Spicer D. Anderson RH anomalous origin and course of the coronary arteries. Cardiol Young. 2010;20(Suppl 3):20–5.
29. Bull C, de Leval M, Mercanti C, Macartney FJ, Anderson RH. Pulmonary atresia with intact ven­tricular septum: a revised classication. Circulation. 1982;66:266–71.
30. Stephens EH, Gupta D, Bleiweis M, Backer CL, Anderson RH, Spicer DE. Coronary arterial abnor­malities in Hypoplastic left heart syndrome: patho­logic characteristics of archived specimens. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020;32:531–8.
Congenital Anomalies ofCoronary
https://t.me/medicina_free
Arteries: Anatomy, Embryology andRisk ofSudden Death
StefaniaRizzo, CristinaBasso, MichelaMuriago, andGaetanoThiene
2
Anatomy ofCoronary Arteries withHistorical Notes
Arturo Banchi, assistant in anatomy to Prof. Chiarugi in Florence, published in 1903 the paper entitled “Morfologia delle arteriae coronariae cordis” (Fig.2.1), rst introducing the concept of coronary arterial patterns [1] (Fig.2.2).
(a) Right dominant when the right coronary
artery gives origin to the posterior descend­ing artery (“branch of the posterior longitu­dinal groove”) and branches to the posterior wall of the left ventricle.
(b) Left dominant when the posterior descend-
ing coronary artery and branches to the pos­terior left ventricular wall take origin from the left circumex artery (“circumex branch”).
(c) Balanced when the posterior descending cor-
onary artery takes origin from the right coronary artery whereas branches to the pos-
S. Rizzo · C. Basso · G. Thiene (*) Department of Cardio-Thoraco-Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, Medical School, Padua, Italy e-mail: s.rizzo@unipd.it; cristina.basso@unipd.it;
gaetano.thiene@unipd.it
M. Muriago Internal Medicine, Pietro Milani Ospital, Noventa Vicentina, Vicenza, Italy
terior left ventricular wall originate from the left circumex artery.
At that time, the cause of myocardial infarc­tion, by sudden coronary thrombotic occlusion, was not yet established. Nowadays, we are well aware of how much important is the coronary arterial pattern for the site and extension of myo­cardial infarction (“infarct related artery”). Moreover, among Bianchi’s drawings, a coronary arterial branch called “right atrial branch” is well evident, arising from the right coronary artery in right dominant pattern and from the left circum­ex artery in the left dominant pattern. We know that it is the artery for the sino-atrial node, which at that time had not been yet discovered as the cardiac pacemaker.
The variability of coronary artery network was conrmed with post-mortem casts by Giorgio Baroldi. His book, published in 1967, is known as the “Bible” of the anatomy and pathology of coronary arteries [2] (Fig.2.3).
Overall, these information, deriving from research of anatomists and pathologists, would have become fundamental for the development of in vivo diagnosis, invented by Mason Sones at the Cleveland Clinic (Fig.2.4) in 1962 by coro­nary angiography [3] and followed by surgical therapy of coronary artery disease, with aorto­coronary by-pass with saphenous vein by Renè Favaloro in 1967 [4] (Fig.2.5).
© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023 G. Butera, A. Frigiola (eds.), Congenital Anomalies of Coronary Arteries,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36966-7_2
19
20
ab
cd
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 2.1 Title page of Dott. Banchi paper
S. Rizzo et al.
Fig. 2.2 The original drawings of coronary artery patterns. (a, b) Right dominance and (c, d) left dominance. From Banchi A [1]
ab
cd
2 Congenital Anomalies ofCoronary Arteries: Anatomy, Embryology andRisk ofSudden Death
https://t.me/medicina_free
21
Fig. 2.3 Postmortem casts of coronary arteries. (a) Left coronary artery anatomy, (b) dominant right pattern, (c) domi- nant left pattern, and (d) balanced pattern. From Baroldi G etal. [2]
22
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 2.4 Mason Sones (1918–1985), the inventor of selective coronary angiography (1962)
S. Rizzo et al.
RITA ligated
Radial-artery graft from
aorta to diagonal
coronary artery
Saphenous-vein graft
from aorta to RCA
In situ graft from
LITA to LAD
Composite RITA
graft from LITA
graft to circumflex
coronary artery
Fig. 2.5 René Favaloro (1923–2000). The inventor of aorto-coronary bypass with autologous saphenous vein (1967)
Embryology ofCoronary Arteries
Earlier, the myocardial blood supply origi­nated directly from the ventricular cavities
Both subepicardial coronary arteries (CAs) and veins derive from epicardial cells [5, 6].
Their development begins with the forma­tion of a plexus-like vasculature, located in the subepicardium, which invades the myo­cardium and develops small vessels and capillaries.
through the intertrabecular spaces lined by endo­cardium (Fig.2.6a). This source of blood to the primitive spongy myocardium disappears with the myocardial compaction (Fig. 2.6b). At this point, the whole intramyocardial vascularization consists of vessels with endothelium derived from the subepicardium [68].
2 Congenital Anomalies ofCoronary Arteries: Anatomy, Embryology andRisk ofSudden Death
https://t.me/medicina_free
ab
23
Fig. 2.6 Embryology of the myocardium. (a) Spongy myocardium with blood supply deriving directly from the endocardium of the ventricular cavities. (b) The myocar-
Fig. 2.7 Origin of coronary arterial stems from the peritruncal epicardial ring
The origin of both CAs and veins, whether intra- or extramural, is similar. Their denitive identity and function depend upon the connec­tion, arteries with the aorta, and veins with the sinus venosus.
dium becomes compact, with blood supply deriving from the subepicardial vasculature
A subepicardial network of cells surrounds the orices of the great arteries (peritruncal ring) and eventually connects with the facing aortic sinuses [5, 9] (Fig. 2.7). The question is whether the development of CAs origin is a matter of ingrowth
24
abcd e
NOT SEEN
PR
https://t.me/medicina_free
S. Rizzo et al.
or outgrowth [10]. There are two hypotheses to explain the connection.
The rst is the outgrowth hypothesis, namely, the development of sprouts or buds from the aor­tic wall of facing sinuses, capturing the peritruncal ring of coronary subepicardial arterial vascula­ture [5, 11] (Fig.2.8).
The second developmental hypothesis is sup­ported by the observation that the prongs of the peritruncal ring penetrate the aortic wall and make contact with the endothelial lining of the aorta [9, 10] (Fig.2.9).
Until the late 1980s, it was thought that CAs entirely derived from an aortic endothelial out­growth that would expand to form the complete coronary system, including coronary veins. Further research in avian models partially argued against this, demonstrating that CA endothelial cells do not bud from the aortic root, but instead grow into the aortic wall from the aortic peritruncal plexus to connect to the systemic circulation, most likely
Fig. 2.8 The hypothesis according to which sprouts or buds arise from the facing aortic sinuses and make contact with the subepicardial coronary vasculature
under the guidance of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and periaortic cardiomyocytes. At least part of the early arterial coronary vascular sys­tem forms through a process of vasculogenesis with subsequent fusion of endothelial cell clusters to form new blood vessels [12, 13].
Recent investigations conrmed that the prox­imal CAs do not grow from the aorta. In the con­trary, they develop from the peritruncal ring of the subepicardial vascular plexus [14, 15] pene­trating into the aorta.
Septation of the arterial pole of the heart (42 days in the human embryo) precedes the appearance of coronary ostia when cells from the peritruncal ring migrate into the aortic root. Septation therefore cannot be responsible for the nal position of coronary orices.
Formation of the left CA precedes the right CA.
Moreover, unlike from the tunica media of the ascending aorta, the tunica media of the CAs does not derive from the neural crest.
Cellular cross-talks and signaling pathways take place (notch and hippo signals, transcription factors, angiogenic molecules, and apoptosis) [1620]. VEGF plays a crucial role in the devel­opment of coronary ostia and main stem forma­tion [14]. Absence of VEGF was shown to inhibit ostia formation. Epicardial inhibition, reducing apoptotic remodelling at the ventricular-arterial junction, alters vascular connection with the aorta and may produce CA anomalies equal to those observed in humans [21].
Why the primitive subepicardial coronary arterial vasculature tends to connect with the fac­ing aortic sinuses, instead of facing pulmonary sinuses, is still a mystery. The explanation cannot be the posterior position of the aorta since in
Fig. 2.9 Ingrowth Developmental Hypothesis with cells of the peritruncal ring penetrating the aortic wall. (ae) show the progression of the ingrowth of epicardial cells trouth thye aortic wall until the endocardium
AO
CA
(LEFT POSTERIOR)
SINUTUBULAR
2 Congenital Anomalies ofCoronary Arteries: Anatomy, Embryology andRisk ofSudden Death
https://t.me/medicina_free
JUNCTION
25
RIGHT CORONARY
AORTIC SINUS
(ANTERIOR)
Fig. 2.10 The topographical variability of coronary artery orices in normal hearts. From Muriago M. etal. [32]
transposition of the great arteries (TGA), where the aorta is anterior, the CAs regularly arise from
NON-CORONARY
AORTIC SINUS
(RIGHT POSTERIOR)
a
LEFT CORONARY
AORTIC SINUS
the facing sinuses of the aorta. Indeed, an anoma­lous origin of a coronary artery from the posterior pulmonary artery in TGA is quite rare [22, 23].
Coronary Artery Anomalies
The incidence of reported coronary artery anom­alies is [15, 2429]
• 0.17% in autopsy,
• 1.2% in coronary angiography, and
• 0.17% in echo series.
Ogden [30] distinguished major anomalies, like coronary artery origin from the pulmonary artery, and minor anomalies, such as high take off, single coronary artery, and origin from a wrong coronary sinus. However, this classica­tion turned out to be untenable, since even some Ogden “minor” anomalies were proven to be life­threatening as well.
Familial clustering of coronary artery anoma­lies has been sporadically reported [31]. It does not exceed the rate of recurrence in siblings and off-springs of other congenital heart diseases and, as such, they cannot be considered a Mendelian disorder.
There is a large spectrum of coronary artery anomalies, from variants of normal without func­tional signicance to real morbid entities at risk of myocardial infarction and sudden death.
b
Fig. 2.11 (a) The right coronary artery orice (arrow) is just above (2mm) the sino-tubular junction, within nor­mal limits. (b) The right coronary orice (arrow) is well above the sino-tubular junction (10mm), over the thresh­old of normal limits. From Thiene, G., Corrado, D., Basso, C. (2016). Coronary Artery Disease. In: Sudden Cardiac Death in the Young and Athletes. Springer, Milano. https://
doi.org/10.1007/978- 88- 470- 5776- 0_3
(a) Variants of normal
• High take off from the aortic root with coronary ostium located less than 2.5mm above the sino-tubular junction [32, 33] (Figs.2.10 and 2.11).