Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_2745_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
29 Мб
Скачать
minimal intervention. A combination intervention seems to increase an individual’s chance of quitting by about 10% to 25%.
18
Mobile phone–based text message interventions have been shown to reduce smoking rates at 6 months. It should be noted that most of these studies were conducted in high-income countries, and so their generalizability to low-income countries is unclear.
19
Programs that utilize incentives appear to increase rates of smoking cessation, while the incentives are in place. Programs that require participants to make a deposit have higher rates of smoking cessation, although they also have lower rates of enrollment.
20
Mass media campaigns can be an effective way to promote smoking cessation among the general public. Campaigns that contain information about the negative health effects of smoking seem to be most effective at increasing knowledge, have higher perceived effectiveness ratings, and are most likely to result in quitting behavior.
21
Obesity
Obesity is associated with an increased MS risk, and that risk is modulated by the level of obesity. There is an increased odds of MS with increasing levels of obesity.
22–24
It is believed
that the association between obesity and MS may be stronger among females, as obesity is associated with a significantly increased risk of MS or clinically isolated syndrome in girls but not in boys. 23 The relationship between obesity and MS is particularly important given the childhood obesity epidemic. Thus, initiatives to decrease obesity, such as the following, may also have a positive impact on MS outcomes:
Behavioral weight management programs that combine both diet and physical activity seem to be more effective in the long term than programs focusing on diet or physical activity alone.
25
https://t.me/medicina_free
Programs that aim to prevent childhood obesity are particularly effective if targeting children ages 6 to 12 years. 26 There is moderately strong evidence that school-based interventions are effective for preventing childhood obesity. 27 Programs and policies that may be helpful to reduce childhood obesity include a school curriculum that provides education about healthy eating, physical activity, and body image; increased opportunities for physical activity throughout the school week; more nutrition food in schools; support for teachers and staff to implement health promotion activities; and a home environment that encourages increased activity, more nutritious meals, and less screen time. 26 Community health workers in the home, clinic, school, or community setting may also help improve body mass index among children.
28
Modifying the built environment may also positively influence health. Environmental factors that had a greater effect include bans or restriction on unhealthy foods, mandates offering healthier foods, altering rules for food purchased using low-income food vouchers, and improvements to active transportation infrastructure.
29
Diet
Diet has a significant impact on body weight, cholesterol levels, and other vascular risk factors that affect MS risk and disease course. These include effects mediated by dietary metabolites derived directly from food, dietary induction of metabolite production by gut microbiota, and diet-mediated changes in gut microbial composition. To summarize, some proinflammatory dietary factors that people with MS may want to avoid include saturated fatty acids of animal origin, trans fats, red meat, sweetened drinks, increased dietary salt, cow milk proteins of the milk fat globule membrane (MGFM proteins), and salt. 30 A low-calorie diet rich in vegetables, fruit, legumes, fish, prebiotics, and probiotics is beneficial because it helps upregulate oxidative metabolism, downregulate the synthesis of proinflammatory molecules, and
https://t.me/medicina_free
restore or maintain a healthy symbiotic gut microbiota. 30 The Mediterranean diet, which is a diet rich in vegetables, legumes, and fruits; moderate in fish; and low in meat, has been positively correlated with a reduced risk of acquiring MS.
31
Given this baseline understanding, we have detailed some of the dietary factors that affect MS:
High salt: It is well established that a diet high in salt increases MS risk. This is because salt can encourage pathogenic T cell responses, which are believed to promote central nervous system autoimmunity. 32 Clinical observations have noted that patients with a high sodium intake tend to present with worse and more frequent
radiological disease activity.
33
Dairy: The Nurses’ Health Study cohorts showed an increased risk for developing MS among women with high intake of whole milk during adolescence. 34 Patients with MS have presented with remarkably heightened T cell responses to milk antigens.
34
Fats: The results of studies on the relationship between dietary fat and MS risk are mixed, with one large-scale study showing that dietary fat intake is not linked to an increased risk of MS. 35 In two large cohorts of over 90,000 women enrolled in each study, it was shown that dietary fat intake is not linked to an increased risk of MS. Theoretically, consumption of fatty foods may lead to inflammation, which could lead to worsening MS symptoms.
Saturated fats are found in foods such as whole milk, butter, cheese, and meat. They are associated with inflammation and are potentially relevant to MS for this reason. 34 It is also established that saturated fat plays a role in increasing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, which has been correlated with poor outcomes in MS. 34 Saturated fats directly affect the innate immune system through activation of proinflammatory toll-like receptors.
34
https://t.me/medicina_free
Trans fats were introduced in the 1960s to replace animal fat but are not actually healthy, as they still have deleterious effects on metabolism. 30 Intake is associated with gut inflammation and upregulation of proinflammatory cytokines.
Regarding omega 3 fatty acids, a self-reported survey of people with MS has found that those consuming fish more frequently and those taking omega 3 supplements had significantly better quality of life and less disability.
36
Fruits and vegetables—Gut microbiota are connected to high-fiber foods. A case control study found protective role for components in plants (fruits/vegetables and grains), including vegetable protein, dietary fiber, cereal fiber, vitamin C, thiamin, riboflavin, calcium, and potassium. 37 This is a public health interest, as it can possibly reduce the incidence and decrease the severity of disease. Among people with MS, healthy consumption of fruit and vegetables and dietary fat predicted better quality of life and less likelihood of higher disability when compared with respondents with a “poor” diet.
38
Exercise
Exercise can prove to be challenging to patients with MS because of barriers such as pain, frequent medical appointments, and transportation. 39 However, exercise therapy may lead to small but important improvements in walking, balance, cognition, fatigue, depression, and quality of life in MS.
40–42
Given the lack of effective therapeutic strategies for
managing the long-term disability associated with MS, exercise training can be an alternative approach.
43
Air Pollution
There is an association between air pollution and autoimmune diseases, including MS. 44 For example, a cross-sectional study in the state of Georgia found that the best predictive models of MS prevalence in the state included PM-10 for females.
https://t.me/medicina_free
Another study found a clustering of prevalence of MS around Atlanta, the largest metropolitan statistical area in Georgia, even after controlling for population distribution, suggesting that another factor such as pollution may be at play. 45 Another study in Tehran, Iran, found that there was a significant difference in exposure to certain air pollutants (PM10, SO2,
NO2, NOx) in those with MS compared with controls. 46 The potential relationship between MS and air pollution is
important given the urbanization of societies and increased exposure to pollutants. Decreasing exposure to these pollutants has important health implications, including for MS.
Health Disparities
MS causes a host of different problems, including physical disability, fatigue, depression, pain, bladder dysfunction, and more, and requires extensive services. Effective management of MS requires coordination between various medical providers and social services to meet the needs of the patient. However, many people with MS do not receive the appropriate treatment for disease management. For example, when asked about the percentage of qualifying people with MS who received treatment, the average answer was 64% from responding members of the European Union, 45% from Brazil, 50% from Russia, 10% to 15% from Turkey, and less than 5% from India.
47
There is significant variation in delivery of care based on the resources available locally. Lack of resources is particularly an issue in developing countries, where there may not be a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner, which is needed for diagnosis; a sufficient number of neurologists; or rehabilitation centers for people with MS. 47 On the bright side, there have been increases in these resources over the years. Between 2008 and 2013, the number of neurologists worldwide increased by 30%, and more emerging countries have acquired MRI machines. 48 However, this increase has not occurred equitably: high-income countries saw an increase of 4.7 new neurologists per 100,000 people, whereas low­income countries only saw 0.4 per 100,000. 48 There are also
https://t.me/medicina_free
areas of the United States where it is more difficult to access MS care. Compared with individuals with MS living in urban areas, those living in rural areas are more likely to use a general practitioner rather than a neurologist as their primary physician and they have to travel greater distances to access MS-focused care.
49
Public health efforts to quantify the resources available in a given region can provide valuable data to motivate governments to initiate change. For example, in 2008, the Multiple Sclerosis Atlas, a joint project of the Multiple Sclerosis International Society and the World Health Organization, found that Ireland had the lowest number of neurologists per head in the European Union. This information was used to advocate for increasing the number of neurologists in the country, and by 2013, the number of neurologists in the country had increased from 14 to 34.
48
In addition to difficulties accessing MS-specific care, disparities also exist in the management of MS comorbidities. For example:
Mental health conditions are often underdiagnosed and undertreated among people with MS. This holds particularly true for those with lower socioeconomic status: a lower income is associated with increased odds of depression and increased odds of undiagnosed depression, and a lower education level is associated with increased odds of untreated depression.
50
People with MS often have bladder dysfunction that would benefit from special care, although they do not always receive the treatment they need. Those without health insurance have reduced odds of receiving medications for bladder symptoms.
50
Individuals with MS commonly have a number of risk factors for osteoporosis, including impaired mobility, limited weight-bearing activity, and low vitamin D levels, which places them at increased risk of fractures. One study of 20 years of a sample of hospital admissions in the United States found that the prevalence of hip
https://t.me/medicina_free
fractures among the MS cohort was over two times greater than in the non-MS cohort and those with MS tended to be younger at the time of fracture. 51 Another study found that many people with MS did not take vitamin D or calcium supplements, which are often recommended to improve bone health.
52
Cost is another source of health disparity among individuals with MS. Those living in low-income countries receive less assistance to fund their MS treatment: 96% of high-income countries partly or fully fund disease-modifying therapies for MS, whereas there is no funding in low-income countries.
48
Even in developed countries, a patient’s insurance influences the ability to adhere to recommended treatment. Higher out-of­pocket copayments and coinsurance are associated with less adherence to disease-modifying therapies. 53 Adherence to therapy affects health outcomes, with increased adherence being associated with less risk of relapse, fewer emergency room visits, and fewer inpatient admissions, 54 as well as less medical costs. 55 Thus, strategies that address cost barriers are important to promote the health of those with MS and to reduce cost to the health care system.
Programs that assist patients with managing their therapy may increase treatment adherence. One study showed that a specialty care management program, which consisted of mailed medications, educational materials, and phone calls from a nurse, was associated with increased adherence to therapy, as well as fewer MS-related hospitalizations in the next year and reduced MS-related medical costs.
56
Additionally, there is a need to better understand the impact of MS on minority populations to deliver better patient-centered care. A persistent challenge in MS treatment is that long-term adherence to treatment is low when compared with other serious, progressive conditions. 57 A more patient-centered approach, which takes into account a patient’s cultural beliefs, treatment preferences, and personal values, may help improve patient experience and quality of life among people with MS. Although such information is important, the severity of MS among non-Hispanic African American and Hispanic
https://t.me/medicina_free
populations remains grossly underresearched in the literature.
58
Thus, it is necessary to study the experience of MS among
minority populations, to address this barrier to providing patient-centered care.
Socioeconomic Disparities
The age of onset for MS is usually between 20 and 40 years; therefore, the disease can result in a substantial loss of productivity for an individual with MS. Many individuals with MS give up their jobs sooner than they would otherwise, and individuals often face a decrease in their standard of living.
59
Factors that influence work capacity include:
Symptomatology: In studies, reported reasons for reducing work hours or becoming unemployed include fatigue, heat sensitivity, cognitive difficulties, and emotional distress.
60,61
Social factors: A study of 50 individuals with MS found that, compared with those who were unemployed, those who had reduced their work hours had more hours of education and higher occupational prestige.
61
Caregivers may also face a negative impact on their professional development because of MS.
59
As a chronic disease that can result in long-term disability, MS can result in significant cost to the health care system. As the prevalence of MS increases, the economic burden of the disease will grow as well. Sources of cost to the economic system include:
Health care costs Other financial burdens outside hospital service such as
alternative transportation methods Disability benefits and collection of social welfare Unemployment
https://t.me/medicina_free
Like any chronic disease, MS results in a cost to the economic system. Nonetheless, cost should not be a barrier for an individual with MS to access treatments and support services, as the inability to access necessary care in the present may result in greater costs in the future. From an economic perspective, programs that help individuals with MS gain independence, such as vocational rehabilitation and training services, and employer education about MS may be beneficial.
Population-Level Awareness
MS is a disease with significant morbidity; in many cases, it affects individuals when they are young and results in increasing disability over time. Individuals with MS not only have to cope with the physical limitations that result from the disease but also may experience psychosocial distress. Consequently, support services are an essential resource for individuals with MS and their families as they navigate the consequences of illness.
The number of MS organizations worldwide has increased from 2008 to 2013, but there is still an unmet need in many parts of the world. Public health efforts to increase the number of organizations in areas where such groups are lacking are necessary.
MS groups and organizations are an important source of support and information about MS, but low-income countries are unlikely to have any such groups. In 2013, 14% of low­income countries reported having an MS group or organization, compared with 91.3% of upper-middle-income countries. 48 According to the 2013 Multiple Sclerosis Atlas, MS organizations often play a role in advising governments and lobbying or campaigning to improve the lives of people with MS. Thus, in countries lacking these organizations, governments may not be aware of the needs of people with MS before creating policy.
According to the Multiple Sclerosis Atlas, MS organizations are also a frequent source for employment advice, legal advice, education advice, home visits, support groups, adaptations, living aids or technical support, and
https://t.me/medicina_free
transportation. 48 Still, many countries lack some of these important support services. Of note:
MS support groups were not available in 22% of responding countries. 48 However, there is evidence that suggests that identification with a support group is associated with less depression and anxiety, as well as increased satisfaction with life. 62 As a public health initiative, MS support groups can be relatively easy to organize and provide significant benefit to people’s quality of life.
48
About 45% of countries surveyed did not have any transportation support available. 48 Individuals with MS may have physical disabilities that affect their ability to access transportation, including public transportation. However, lack of transportation results in reduced access to health care and support services and social isolation. Conducting research identifying barriers to transportation and implementing strategies to increase access to transportation is imperative.
Family members of those with MS often assume the role of the caregiver. The Multiple Sclerosis Atlas notes that respite care is an important type of support for family members, but only 39% of responding countries reported that such a service was provided. 48 Investigation into the lack of respite service and creation of such programs may help ease the emotional and physical burden that family members face.
On the other hand, health professionals in the public sector were not a common source of MS support or services. Furthermore, 17% of countries that responded reported that specific training for health professionals in MS is not available. This suggests that there is room to increase professional education, awareness, and advocacy regarding the multiple dimensions of MS.
Conclusion
https://t.me/medicina_free