Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_4518_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
30 Мб
Скачать
7 Allergy andImmunology
https://t.me/medicina_free
Indoor
• Dust
• Mites
• Cockroach
• Molds
• Dander
• Feather
Outdoor
• Tree pollen—spring
• Grass pollen—summer
• Weed pollen—fall
• Molds—(spring/fall)
– Drug – Insect—sting, bites – Foods
Allergic Rhinitis
Diagnosis
95
History
– Primary symptoms, duration, frequency, alleviating/exacerbating factors,
associated symptoms or conditions, recent changes in job, environment, diet
– Past medical history: history of asthma, anaphylaxis, eczema, allergen expo-
sure, formula intolerance – Past surgical history: T+A, BMT, FESS – Family history: allergic rhinitis, asthma, eczema, angioedema, food intoler-
ance, anaphylaxis
Chance of having atopy with:
• 0 allergic parents: 10–15%
• 1 allergic parent: 30%
• 2 allergic parents: 50%
– Social history: Living accommodations, tobacco exposure, occupation – Medication use
Physical
Eyes: lid edema and erythema, injection of conjunctiva and sclera, chemosis,
itching, watery, photophobia, “allergic shiners,” “Dennies lines”
96
https://t.me/medicina_free
A. Del Signore et al.
Nose: supratip crease, facial grimacing, itching, nasal obstruction, inferior
turbinate hypertrophy, rhinorrhea, increased mucus, sneezing – Ears: tympanic membrane retraction, Eustachian tube dysfunction, middle
ear effusion – Oropharynx: “cobblestoning” of posterior pharyngeal wall, hypertrophy of
lateral pharyngeal bands, mouth breathing, angioedema – Laryngeal: excess secretions, vocal fold edema, laryngeal drying, erythema-
tous arytenoids, viscous mucus – Possible related systemic ndings:
Skin: eczema, contact dermatitis, urticaria, Lungs: wheezing, dyspnea, cough
Differential Diagnosis
– Drug-induced rhinitis – Rhinitis medicamentosa – Occupational rhinitis – Chemical rhinitis – Infectious rhinitis – Rhinitis of pregnancy/hormone induced – Food-/alcohol-induced rhinitis – Vasomotor rhinitis – Atrophic rhinitis – Autoimmune/granulomatous/vasculitic rhinitis
Diagnostic Testing
In vivo testing
– Although testing is generally safe, necessary medications and airway equip-
ment to treat systemic anaphylaxis must be available. – Skin testing
Epicutaneously
• Skin prick test.
– Can be tested via individual vs. multiple allergen delivery. – Useful to direct allergy immunotherapy. – Allows for the identication of specic sensitivities. – More specic testing than intradermal (fewer false-positive results). – Sensitivity and specicity around 80%. – False negative rate is 5%. – Various antigens introduced in controlled manner—to determine
reactivity and severity.
7 Allergy andImmunology
https://t.me/medicina_free
– Few drops of selected antigen are placed on skin surface after small
prick with needle.
– Crosslinks IgE on cutaneous mast cells resulting in release of
mediators. – Reaction >3mm in diameter is considered positive. – Contraindications: severe asthma, uncontrolled cardiovascular dis-
ease, inability to refrain from beta-blocker use, pregnancy
Intradermal
• Can be done as a primary testing modality, typically recommended to be performed after negative prick test, but specic sensitivity is suspected.
• Not appropriate for food allergens due to high risk of false positives and risk of anaphylaxis.
Small amount of allergen injected subcutaneously.
• More reproducible and sensitive testing than prick testing (fewer false negatives).
• Can be used to determine starting point of allergy immunotherapy.
Skin end point titration.
– Intradermal injections of allergen at increasing concentrations start-
ing with an anticipated non-reacting dose.
– Wheal which initiates positive reaction is safe starting point for
immunotherapy.
– Vial preparation technique.
97
Start with concentrate 1:20 w/v 1cm3 is mixed with 4cm3 dilu­ent rendering a concentration of 1:100 w/v (#1). The serial dilution is continued ve additional times until a nal solution of 1:312,500 w/v (#6). Final vial dilutions:
• 1:20 w/v (concentrate)
• 1:100 w/v (#1)
• 1:500 w/v (#2)
• 1:2500 w/v (#3)
• 1:12,500 w/v (#4)
• 1:62,500 w/v (#5)
• 1:312,500 w/v (#6)
– Technique
Start with inert diluent injection 0.02mL 4mm wheal, and expand to 5mm by hydrostatic force measured at 10min normal. Testing begins with injection of antigen at the lowest reactive concentration (#6) followed by sequential increases of concentra­tion (#5) (#4) etc. until a wheal enlarges by 2mm which signies an “endpoint” concentration.
98
https://t.me/medicina_free
Factors which affect wheal response:
• Recent exposure
• Prior immunotherapy
• Area of body tested—i.e., upper back > lower arm
• Age of patient—pediatric and geriatric tend to have less response
• Medications affecting skin wheal
– Inhibition: antihistamines, tricyclic antidepressants, H2 blockers,
systemic beta agonists, theophylline, vitamin C, anti-IgE monoclonal antibodies
– Enhancement: histamine control to close to allergen, skin conditions
(dermatographia, urticaria), glycerin sensitivity, beta-blockers
– No effect: systemic steroids, leukotriene modiers, cromolyn,
inhaled beta-2 agonist
In vitro testing
A. Del Signore et al.
• “endpoint”: concentration that produces positive wheal that is at least 2mm wider than control
• Considered safe point for starting skin testing
Injection of next stronger concentration that results in further 2mm in growth “conrmatory” concentration 13mm growth major reaction, testing stopped
– Serum test – Detects specic IgE to allergens
Suspected allergen bound to insoluble material patient serum added
• If IgE present in serum binding to allergen occurs
• Marker labeled anti-IgE added and attaches to IgE washed and detec­tion occurs
• Detection of marker
– Radiation: RAST—(Radioallergosorbent test) – Enzyme linked: ELISA – Flourescence: Immunocap
• The higher the signal the more IgE in the patient’s serum
Scoring:
• 0–6 based on level of IgE in specimen
– Indications:
Inability to discontinue medications that would interfere with skin test­ing—i.e., antihistamines, H2 blockers, tricyclic antidepressants, long-term topical steroids Severe eczema or psoriasis precluding skin testing Difcult populations, i.e., children, needle phobia
7 Allergy andImmunology
https://t.me/medicina_free
Extraordinarily high sensitivity to suspected allergens that may lead to potentially serious side effects (i.e., anaphylaxis) Poorly controlled reactive airway disease
– More specic in determining allergen sensitivity, less sensitive than skin tests
Management ofAllergy Symptoms
Nonpharmacologic
• Avoidance
– Goals include:
To remove sources of allergens To remove accumulated allergens To prevent allergens from returning
– Outdoor
Pollen
• Types
99
– Trees—February through May – Grass—June through August – Weeds—August until frost
• Counts highest in morning, hot, dry windy days
• Strategies of avoidance:
– Shift outdoor activities to evening. – Keep doors and windows closed; utilize AC.
Mold (can be found both outdoor and indoor)
• Present year round
• Strategies of avoidance:
– Minimize wet/damp environments. – Improve ventilation within house. – If known source of mold within home, have remediated.
– Indoor
Dust mites
• Keep surfaces clear.
• Remove carpeting.
• HEPA lters
• Wash sheets and pillowcase weekly in hot water >130°C.
100
https://t.me/medicina_free
Pet dander
• Avoidance of pet, especially keeping pet out of bed and bedroom.
• Eliminate carpeting.
• Washing pets—only temporary relief.
– Other nonpharmacologic alternatives:
HEPA (high-efciency particulate air) lters Air puriers Vacuum cleaners Dust barriers
A. Del Signore et al.
Pharmacologic Therapy
• Symptomatic relief
• Decongestants
– Reduce blood ow agonistic action on alpha-1 and alpha-2 adrenergic
receptors
Endothelial cells within nasal vessels Contraction of sphincters of the venous plexus within turbinate
– Oral agents
Less chance for rebound congestion Systemic effects include irritability, insomnia, headache, tachycardia, hypertension, increased intraocular pressure, and urinary retention. Caution use in patients: hypertension, coronary disease, hyperthyroidism, glaucoma, urinary retention For example, pseudoephedrine and phenylephrine
– Topical nasal agents
Rapid onset <5min with duration of 6h High local potency with fewer systemic effects Overuse >3–5days leads to lost effectiveness and rebound congestion. For example, oxymetazoline, neosynephrine, phenylephrine
• Maintenance
• Antihistamines
– Competitively bind to H1 receptors reduced vascular permeability, smooth
muscle contraction, mucus secretion, vasodilation, pruritis
– Oral
7 Allergy andImmunology
https://t.me/medicina_free
First generation—available over the counter, cheap
• Limited due to potential for sedative effects high lipophilicity crosses blood brain barrier
• Anticholinergic effects dry mucus membranes, urinary retention, constipation, tachycardia, blurred vision: limit use in elderly.
• For example, diphenhydramine, chlorpheniramine, hydroxyzine
Second generation
• Lower CNS penetration and thus less sedating
• Less anticholinergic effects
• Lower interaction with cytochrome P 450
• Better specicity for H1 receptor blockade
• For example, loratadine, cetirizine, fexofenadine
– Topical nasal spray
Advantage of delivering high local concentration Allows higher anti-inammatory effects, reduction of systemic exposure, reducing potential for systemic side effects Typically recommended for patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis For example, azelastine and olopatadine
• Anti-leukotriene
101
– Inferior to intranasal corticosteroids and oral antihistamines; more costly. Not
recommended as monotherapy for AR.Can be considered for patients who
cannot tolerate INCS – Combined use with antihistamines typically with additive effect – Synthesis blockade
Blockade of 5-lipoxygenase prevention of LTA4 synthesis formation For example, zileuton
– Receptor blockade
Reduces number of peripheral blood eosinophils For example, montelukast and zarlukast
• Corticosteroids
– Available as systemic, injection, or topical intranasal delivery
Multiple anti-inammatory effects
• Decreased capillary permeability
• Promotes IL-10 production and IL-1 receptor antagonism
• Decreased arachidonic metabolism decreased prostaglandins, leu­kotrienes, thromboxane
• Allows inhibition of cytokines and chemokines
• Decreased recruitment and migration of eosinophils
• Decreased activity of basophils and mast cells
• Decreased migration of APC, T cells, B cells
102
https://t.me/medicina_free
A. Del Signore et al.
– Topical intranasal delivery
Recommended for persistent nasal congestion Systemic effects a theoretical concern and not supported by the literature
• Inhibition of growth in children, metabolic disturbances, glaucoma, cataract formation, immunosuppression, skin thinning
Effectiveness
• Effective for all symptoms of SAR and PAR
• Appropriate for mixed rhinitis
• Clinical response equivocal for all available steroids
Topical side effects include local burning, stinging, irritation, and dryness. For example, beclomethasone, budesonide, unisolide, triamcinolone, uticasone, mometasone
• Mast cell stabilizers
– Inhibit Ca2+-dependent mast cell degranulation – Inhibit migration and survival of macrophages, eosinophils, and monocytes – When used prophylactically, they can prevent and treat symptoms, although
they commonly need to be used as adjunct and not rst-line therapy. – Side effects include nasal burning, stinging, and sneezing. – For example, cromolyn
• Anticholinergic agents
– Muscarinic receptor blockade inhibits rhinorrhea, congestion, and sneezing – Side effects can include dry mouth, dizziness, blurred vision, conjunctivitis,
and hoarseness. – Typically suggested for treatment of rhinorrhea – Caution in use with elderly with glaucoma and urinary retention – For example, ipratropium
Immunomodulation
• Allergen immunotherapy (AIT)
– Differs from pharmacotherapy because it reverses the underlying pathophysi-
ology of allergy, not just symptom control or cell stabilization. Evidenced by
reduction in new sensitizations – Treats IgE-mediated allergy regular and progressive doses of appropriate
allergen downregulation of immune response and control of symptoms – Benets include:
Improvement in quality of life Reduction of symptoms Decrease reliance on medications Long-term benet after stopping treatment if they complete 3–5 years of therapy
7 Allergy andImmunology
https://t.me/medicina_free
Decrease risk of developing asthma Prevent new sensitizations
– Indications for therapy
Demonstration of IgE-mediated disease correlates with symptoms Insufcient response to avoidance and pharmacotherapy Signicant side effects with medical therapy Unable to comply with medical therapy and avoidance of allergens Moderate-to-severe symptoms which last for a majority of a year or span­ning across two or more seasons
– Effective to following antigens:
Grass Tree Pollen Animal dander Insect venom House dust mites Mold
– Relative contraindications
Concomitant therapy with beta-blocker Contraindication to administration of epinephrine Noncompliance of patient Autoimmune disease Pregnancy Uncontrolled asthma HIV or other immunodeciency
103
– Mechanism of action
With initial treatments 2–3months of increased antigen specic IgE followed by gradual decline over 2years
• Decline does not correlate to clinical improvement
With decline in IgE rise in IgG1 and IgG4
• Mediated by T
• Increase in IgG4 correlates with symptom relief
Increase in antigen specic suppressor T cells Shift TH2 cells to TH1 via increased IFN-gamma and IL-12 Decline in levels of pro-allergenic cytokines Reduced basophil, mast cell, and lymphocyte reactivity Blunting of post-seasonal rise in specic IgE antibody Gradual decrease in symptoms with repeated exposure to same aller­gen level
production of IL-10 and TGF-β
reg
104
https://t.me/medicina_free
– Schedule of treatment
Total treatment period is 3–5years Escalation phase rst year
• Rush versus standard schedules
– Allows for the attainment of maintenance doses in as low as 6days
through the use of increased frequency dosing (q 3–4 h) versus 3–6months with standard schedules
– Rush schedules typically necessitate hospitalization during the esca-
lation period
Maintenance phase up to 5years
• Weekly for rst year, every 2weeks for second year, every 3weeks for third year
– Allergy extracts
Ideally, extracts are highly immunogenic without elevated risk of IgE release. Traditional extracts—allergenic component extracted from raw material (plant, animal, mold source) Modied extracts—modied raw extracts that allow augmented immuno­genicity while decreasing adverse events
A. Del Signore et al.
– Modes of delivery
Subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT)
• Time-tested and effective for treatment of AR
• Wide variability in form of administration (single allergen vs. multiple allergens, formulation)
• Diluents
– 50% glycerin—effective for maintaining extract potency, but painful
upon injection
– Phenol-saline extract containing 0.3% albumin maintains potency for
non-proteolytic allergens. Less painful
• Regimen begins at a dilution of nal dose for safety and is escalated weekly/monthly to a maintenance schedule.
• Must be delivered at a medical facility where adverse events are promptly recognized and mitigated
• Discuss with patients the short-term increased cost and inconvenience compared to long-term pharmacologic need.
Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT)
• Supported by many high-quality studies approaching the volume of SCIT.