Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_3706_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
33 Мб
Скачать
70
https://t.me/med1917
available in the American College of Radiology’s 2023 ACR Manual on Contrast Media [72].
The advantages of CT include a high spatial resolution of CT images, a superb depiction of bony details and small cal­cications, and the ability to image large areas of anatomy in a single, rapid scan. The disadvantages of CT include expo­sure to ionizing radiation and risks associated with contrast administration. Of note, the radiation dose from scanning extremities is signicantly less than that associated with scans through the torso. Orthopedic hardware can cause a “beam hardening” artifact that obscures the surrounding anatomy, but with newer generations of scanners as well as new techniques for the reduction of metal artifacts, the effects are less pronounced than they have been in the past [74, 75]. Nonetheless, stents, dense prostheses, and large metallic constructs can pose problems for diagnostic imaging.
During early stages of acute osteomyelitis, changes may be difcult to detect on radiography but can frequently be documented on CT. CT is superior to radiography in the detection of cortical destruction (Fig.5.10), intramedullary bone destruction, periostitis, and soft tissue or intraosseous gas [76, 77]. CT can also demonstrate increased density of intraosseous medullary fat due to marrow edema and the blurring of soft tissue fat planes due to the presence of pus and edema [78, 79]. CT is extremely effective in demonstrat­ing a bony sequestrum when present in chronic osteomyelitis (a focus of necrotic bone insulated from viable bone by gran­ulation tissue). The sequestrum appears as a dense bone spic­ule situated within the medullary cavity and surrounded by soft tissue density [7, 80]. CT scan is useful for the detection of radiographically occult foreign bodies, even those that are not traditionally considered radio-opaque (e.g., wood) and is superior to MRI in detecting subcutaneous gas [25]. While CT scans performed with intravenous iodinated contrast material can demonstrate soft tissue abscesses and necrotic tissue as areas of nonenhancement, MRI and ultrasound, imaging modalities that possess superior intrinsic soft tissue contrast resolution, are better suited to the imaging of abscess collections and, when necessary, can be performed in the absence of intravenous contrast. Thus, the use of CT for the detection of soft tissue abscess should be weighed against the risk of contrast-induced complications. Overall, data on the sensitivity or specicity of CT for the diagnosis of dia­betic pedal osteomyelitis are scant. In light of concerns regarding risks of ionizing radiation, allergic reaction to con­trast, and, in particular, contrast-induced nephropathy, CT is not considered a front-line diagnostic test for osteomyelitis. However, the 2019 American College of Radiology guide­lines indicate that CT, without or with IV contrast, may be appropriate in the evaluation of a patient with neuropathic arthropathy and soft tissue swelling because CT can identify more subtle, radiographically occult changes of neuroar-
M. G. Hochman and C. Connolly
Fig. 5.10 Metatarsal osteonecrosis on CT. The second and third meta­tarsal heads are attened. The radiolucencies beneath the deformed metatarsal heads represent subchondral fractures (arrows). CT exqui­sitely demonstrates these cortical abnormalities
thropathy and may be particularly useful when MRI is con­traindicated [25].
Dual-energy CT technology (DECT), also known as spec­tral CT, refers to recent technological developments that, among other capabilities, allows for the detection of bone marrow edema by CT [81, 82]. DECT can also be used as an aid in decreasing artifacts from metallic hardware and may allow for a decreasing contrast dose required for CT angiog­raphy [83]. DECT can only be performed on a specially designed dedicated CT scanner. Traditionally, MRI has been the imaging modality of choice for the detection of bone marrow edema, but DECT, when available, may offer similar capabilities. Yan et al. found that DECT had sensitivity of 91% and specicity of 95% in the identication of bone mar­row edema in the ankle [84]. Foti etal. compared DECT with MRI in 44 patients, 32 ultimately diagnosed with osteomy­elitis, and found DECT to have similar sensitivity to MRI for
5 Imaging ofInfection intheDiabetic Foot
https://t.me/med1917
71
the diagnosis of osteomyelitis (89.1% for MRI, 89.0% for DECT), though with somewhat lower specicity (87.5% MRI, 72.9% for DECT). The accuracy for bone marrow edema was slightly higher for MRI (AUC 0.93 MRI, 0.85 for DECT), with DECT showing improved detection of bone erosions (AUC 0.53 MRI, AUC 0.92 DECT) [85].
Ultrasound
Gray-scale ultrasound has very limited application in the imaging of bone and bone infection because of the acoustic shadowing caused by the cortical bone, though ultrasound has been used to image soft tissue infection and subperios­teal abscesses and can be used to guide the aspiration of soft tissue infection. (A duplex Doppler ultrasound imaging of the vasculature in the diabetic foot is discussed in another chapter.) The 2019 American College of Radiology guide­lines describe ultrasound as “usually not appropriate” for the assessment of suspected osteomyelitis in the diabetic foot, even when soft tissue swelling and/or ulceration is present [25].
Ultrasound images are produced using an ultrasound transducer to transmit and receive ultrasonic waves of given frequencies by holding the transducer against a patient’s skin [86]. The amplitude of the sound that is reected back (rather than transmitted forward) is translated into a gray-scale image of the underlying anatomy. Areas of interest are described based on their resultant echogenicity. Areas that transmit ultrasound waves with negligible reectance, such as simple uid, appear uniformly dark and are termed anechoic; areas that are highly reective of sound waves, such as cortical bone, appear bright and are termed hyper­echoic. Different tissues, such as muscles, tendons, and nerves, when normal, have characteristic reectance pat­terns. Diagnostic ultrasonography of the foot is performed using a high-frequency transducer, often in conjunction with a stand-off pad or its equivalent.
Ultrasound has many advantages for imaging the diabetic patient. Ultrasound examinations do not involve ionizing radiation, entail minimal patient discomfort, and can often be performed in small children without the use of sedation. Ultrasound can be performed in patients who might have contraindications to MRI and can often yield a diagnostic examination in cases where orthopedic hardware might pre­clude successful imaging by MRI or CT. Ultrasound equip­ment is relatively low cost, easily transportable, and more widely available than MRI in many countries. Unlike many other imaging modalities, ultrasound readily provides real­time imaging and therefore can be used to assess motion and guide aspirations, biopsies, and therapeutic injections. The major—and important—disadvantage of ultrasound is that it requires a high level of operator and interpreter expertise.
Ultrasound is well suited for the evaluation of supercial soft tissues and for guiding the aspiration and drainage of intra- or extra-articular uid collections. Abscesses are seen as hypoechoic collections with increased through­transmission (that is, the tissue deep to the abscess appears more echogenic than expected because the sound waves are attenuated to a lesser degree by the uid in the abscess than by the soft tissue surrounding the abscess) (Fig. 5.11). However, an abscess may be difcult to identify on ultra­sound when its contents become proteinaceous because it can then become isoechoic to the surrounding tissues and may fail to demonstrate enhanced signal in the tissues deep to the abscess. Similarly, joint effusions and tenosynovial uid collections are often visible as hypoechoic on ultra­sound but may be less evident when their contents are com­plex. Even when sonography demonstrates a uid collection, the presence or absence of infection within the uid cannot be established by imaging. Thus, ultrasound is often employed for guiding the aspiration of the suspect uid collection.
Ultrasound is not very useful for a direct evaluation of osteomyelitis, particularly early osteomyelitis, because cor­tical bone causes acoustic shadowing that obscures the underlying bone [87] (Fig.5.12). However, in children, the use of ultrasound to demonstrate subperiosteal abscesses has been described [88, 89]. Subperiosteal abscess is a feature of osteomyelitis in children but not adults because, in children, the periosteum is more loosely adherent to the bone and, therefore, more easily displaced by pus. Subperiosteal abscess appears as an anechoic or moderately echoic zone >2mm thick, adjacent to the bone and can be detected prior to changes on plain radiographs [90, 91]. Care must be taken not to mistake soft tissue abscess or soft tissue inammatory changes adjacent to the bone for subperiosteal abscess [92]. Power Doppler sonography can be used to demonstrate hyperemia surrounding a subperiosteal abscess, though it may not be positive in the early days of abscess formation [93]. Other signs associated with osteomyelitis that may be apparent at ultrasound include stulous communication between a subperiosteal abscess and the skin surface, swell­ing and edema in muscles immediately overlying the infected bone, and, in advanced cases, frank discontinuity of the cor­tex [87, 94, 95]. Ultrasound can be very useful for the detec­tion of foreign bodies [96] (Fig.5.12). Using ultrasound, an invivo study of 50 patients with suspected nonradiopaque foreign bodies yielded a sensitivity of 95% and specicity of 89% for foreign body detection [97].
Because it can readily demonstrate musculoskeletal soft tissue structures and allows for accurate measurement, ultra­sound has been used in a number of studies to identify cor­relates for degradation in biomechanical function in the diabetic foot. For example, D’Ambrogi etal. measured the thickness of the Achilles tendon and plantar fascia in 61 dia-
72
https://t.me/med1917
M. G. Hochman and C. Connolly
ab
Fig. 5.11 Soft tissue abscess on ultrasound. (a) AP radiograph of the foot shows soft tissue swelling adjacent to the fth metatarsal (arrow) but does not distinguish between generalized soft tissue swelling and the detection of a focal abscess. (b) A gray-scale ultrasound image obtained in cross-section to the base of the fth metatarsal shows a complex uid collection in the overlying soft tissues (arrows), consis­tent with an abscess. Simple uid appears anechoic (dark), but more complex components are similar in echogenicity to—and harder to dis-
Fig. 5.12 Foreign body on ultrasound. Ultrasound image along the longitudinal axis of a digit shows a small hyperechoic line (arrow) rep­resenting a small 12 mm foreign body. Thicker hyperechoic lines (arrowheads) represent the bony cortex, which obscures the underlying medullary cavity. T tendon, J joint space
betic patients (27 without neuropathy, 34 without) and 21 healthy volunteers and found signicant thickening of the plantar fascia and Achilles tendon in the diabetic patients [98]. The abnormalities were more pronounced in neuro­pathic patients. Hsu and Wang etal. used ultrasound to com­pare the heel-pad mechanical properties in Type II diabetes patients with and without forefoot ulceration against healthy controls and found higher energy dissipation ratios when
tinguish from—surrounding tissues. The bright, hyperechoic curvilin­ear line is the cortex of the bone (arrowheads). The dark, anechoic area below the cortex is caused by acoustic shadowing from the cortex and (routinely) precludes an ultrasound evaluation of the medullary cavity. The small bright area immediately above the cortex (curved arrow) rep­resents an orthopedic wire. The bright, hyperechoic area next to the bone (asterisk) represents enhanced-through transmission, a sign that the tissue above it has uid content
exposed to a load that simulated peak standing in-shoe plan­tar pressures within the heel pad of patients with Type II dia­betes. They speculated that this could increase the risk of developing foot ulceration [99]. Naemi etal. used real-time ultrasound elastography to measure the thickness and stiffness of the heel pad in 39 patients, ten of whom had ulcerations at a site other than the heel or submetatarsal foot pad [100]. In this preliminary assessment, they found that the group with foot ulceration had a signicantly lower relative stiffness of the heel pad. This latter study employed a rela­tively recently developed ultrasound-based technique, known as US elastography (EUS), which allows for the assessment of the mechanical properties of tissues [101]. Several alter­native techniques for the measurement of tissue stiffness using ultrasound exist. Strain or compression ultrasound elastography involves the application of a compressive force to the tissue, with a resultant axial displacement of tissue (strain). Strain is calculated by comparing the data obtained before and after compression. Assuming the applied stress is uniform, the elastic modulus of the tissue is inversely pro­portional to the measured strain (based on Hooke’s law for the calculation of Young’s elastic modulus, which is a mea­sure of the stiffness of a solid material). The relative strain of one tissue area to another is compared and displayed as a color map overlaying a gray-scale anatomic image. In con-
5 Imaging ofInfection intheDiabetic Foot
https://t.me/med1917
73
trast, shear wave EUS is based on the fact that shear waves are generated within the tissue by conventional ultrasound waves. These shear waves propagate perpendicular to the axial displacement caused by the ultrasound wave, and the shear waves experience rapid attenuation. The velocity of these shear waves can be measured and used to calculate tis­sue stiffness. Shear wave EUS yields both color maps of stiffness overlaying the gray-scale anatomic image and, in theory, objective quantitative maps of elasticity in (kPA) and shear wave velocity (cm/s).
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
Technique
MRI is considered the next examination to be obtained, after radiographs, for the assessment of bone and soft tissue infec­tion in the diabetic foot [25, 26]. Because it provides high intrinsic soft tissue contrast, MRI exquisitely depicts the full spectrum of soft tissues and can demonstrate radiographi­cally occult bone marrow edema, without the use of intrave­nous contrast. The advantages of MRI over scintigraphy are precise anatomic denition and improved lesion char­actcrization, lack of ionizing radiation, and shorter overall exam times. Because of its high sensitivity to abnormal bone and soft tissue edema and high negative predictive value, MRI can readily detect and delineate the anatomic location and extent of an infection and can exclude infection when it is absent, making it a useful aid for surgical planning [10] (Table5.3). Because of high sensitivity to marrow and soft tissue edema on MRI, however, it can sometimes be difcult to distinguish osteomyelitis and soft tissue infection from other causes of edema, such as fracture, early osteonecrosis, and reactive edema around an infection site. Postoperative and postdebridement changes can also cause marrow and soft tissue edema and can be impossible to distinguish from edema due to infection. MRI can be limited by artifacts related to metallic hardware that can obscure the surrounding tissues. While patients with orthopedic hardware can usually be imaged, assessment of the area immediately surrounding the metallic hardware is frequently limited by the distortion of the local magnetic eld. The extent of metal susceptibility artifact varies with the size and type of metal and can be minimized using certain imaging sequences (e.g., high-reso­lution fast or turbo spin-echo sequences). New MR imaging techniques promise even more robust metal suppression,
Table 5.3 Indications for MRI in the detection of infection
Characterize soft tissue abnormalities, including any abscesses or stulae Exclude osteomyelitis Perform preoperative assessment—The location and extent of the bone and soft tissue abnormalities
with the potential ability to image tissues immediately adja­cent to metal, but these are inconsistently available [102]. Susceptibility artifact is generally more pronounced with stainless steel and less pronounced with titanium. Some, but not all, external xation devices are MR-compatible. Some are ferromagnetic or paramagnetic and might displace in the magnetic eld, so external xation constructs must be tested for magnetic susceptibility prior to imaging. Moreover, any metal implant can result inlocal tissue heating, so patients with metal implants must be able to sense and communicate discomfort to the MR technologist at the time of imaging. MRI is contraindicated in patients who have pacemakers and other electronic implants, ferromagnetic cranial aneurysm clips, and intraocular metal. Some MRI-compatible versions of spinal stimulators and pacemakers have recently been developed, but these are not yet in common use [103]. Most claustrophobic patients can be imaged with sedation or with the use of an open architecture magnet. The current genera­tion of MRI machines, even when not formally described as “open” magnets, are built with shorter, wider bores (tubes) and are often well tolerated. Weight limitations for obese patients currently range from 300 to 450 pounds, depending on the magnet.
MRI scanners produce images using a strong magnetic eld and radiofrequency (RF) waves. The magnetic eld cre­ates an equilibrium state for the atoms in the body, the RF wave perturbs the atoms, and the scanner then records how the different atoms respond. Clinical magnets range in eld strength from 0.2 Tesla to 3 Tesla: the higher the eld strength, the higher the potential signal-to-noise and spatial resolution (anatomic detail) in the resultant images. A vari­ety of open, wide-bore, short-bore, and dedicated extremity magnets are now available. In order to optimally detect the signal produced by tissues in response to the radiofrequency wave perturbation and to generate high-resolution images, local RF receiver coils (“coils”) are employed. Thus, for imaging the foot, a small diameter tubular extremity or foot­and- ankle coil is placed around the extremity. A typical MRI exam lasts for 30–60min, during which time approximately four to eight imaging sequences are acquired. A sequence is a set of images designed to highlight specic tissue features and can be obtained in axial, coronal, sagittal, or any desired orientation. Some newer systems can obtain a 3D sequence that can then be reformatted into any plane. Imaging sequences are described in terms of the length of their TR (time-to-repetition) and TE (time-to-echo) times and in terms of any special radiofrequency pulses they employ (e.g., fat saturation or inversion recovery pulses). Commonly used imaging sequences are reviewed in Table5.4. Anatomic and pathologic structures are described in terms of their sig­nal intensity on a specic imaging sequence, often in relation to muscle. For example, fat and fatty marrow appear bright on T1-weighted images and are described as hyperintense or
74
https://t.me/med1917
Table 5.4 MRI sequences—characteristics and applications
Sequence Parameters Use Characteristics T1-weighted
(Figs. 5.13a, 5.14a,
5.15a, 5.18a)
Proton density weighted
T2 weighted Long TE
Fat saturated T2 weighted
STIR (Figs. 5.14b, 5.15b,
5.18b)
Fat-saturated proton density weighted
T1 weighted with fat saturation (fat sat) (Fig. 5.13b)
Dynamic- contrast­enhanced T1 weighted With fat saturation
Diffusion- weighted Images
Short TE Short TR
Short TE Long TR
Long TR
Long TE Long TR
---------­Fat saturation Pulse Long TR Intermediate to long TE
---------­Inversion recovery pulse
Short TE Long TR
---------­Fat saturation Pulse Short TE Short TR
---------­Fat saturation Pulse
Short TE Short TR
---------­Fat saturation Pulse
---------­After the injection of contrast, very rapid sequential images through a given volume of tissue
“B value” determines the degree of diffusion weighting
Good for demonstrating anatomy Good for demonstrating anatomy Fluid-sensitive Fluid and edema are bright or hyperintense on T2-weighted images
Fluid-sensitive (very)
Fluid-sensitive (very)
Fluid-sensitive Normal fatty marrow is dark or low signal. Edema and uid
Gadolinium contrast sensitive
Gadolinium contrast sensitive with high temporal resolution
Measures random (Brownian) motion of water molecules within tissues
Normal fat and fatty marrow are bright or hyperintense on T1-weighted images
Similar to T1-weighted sequence, but uid and muscle are not as dark or low signal
but may be hard to distinguish from fat, unless fat saturation is employed Fluid and edema are bright or hyperintense; fat is dark or hypointense Very sensitive screen for uid collections and for edema associated with infection or inammation
Normal fatty marrow is dark or low signal. Edema and uid collections become bright or high signal Very sensitive screen for uid collections and for edema associated with infection or inammation, but anatomic detail is not well depicted
collections become bright or high signal It can also screen for uid and edema
Gadolinium contrast appears as bright or high signal. Abscesses and proteinaceous or hemorrhagic uid can also appear as bright/ high signal. Fat and simple uid are dark or low signal Obtained both before and after IV contrast to detect contrast enhancement. Pre- and postcontrast sequences can be compared visually or can be computationally subtracted to demonstrate enhancing areas. Inhomogeneous fat suppression can occur, particularly in the foot, and should not be mistaken for enhancement When used without contrast, this sequence can distinguish fatty masses from hemorrhagic or proteinaceous uid, e.g., lipoma from hematoma or proteinaceous ganglion cyst Allows the tracking of wash-in and wash-out of IV contrast through tissue over time, yielding a time- intensity curve of IV contrast passing through the tissue, which varies based on tissue vascularity, vessel permeability, and the volume of interstitial space and which may help distinguish osteomyelitis from normal tissue and from neuroarthropathy Using a pharmacokinetic mathematic model, can generate values for parameters that may also help distinguish osteomyelitis from normal tissue and neuroarthropathy, e.g., transfer constant K (measures the leakage of contrast into interstitial space), Kep (measures the diffusion of contrast from interstitium back into vascular space), and Ve (volume of extracellular space) Free water has the lowest signal on diffusion-weighted images; water molecules with restricted diffusion are higher in signal. Free diffusion can be restricted by the presence of macromolecules, bers, and membranes. Thus, free uid is low signal on DWI images. Pus is higher signal than free water due to the restriction of free diffusion DWI refers to diffusion-weighted images; apparent diffusion coefcient (ADC) represents exponential decay of a component of the diffusion signal. Both DWI and ADC sequences may be presented
M. G. Hochman and C. Connolly
trans
5 Imaging ofInfection intheDiabetic Foot
https://t.me/med1917
75
a
b
Fig. 5.13 Soft tissue abscess on MRI.Axial images of the ankle in a diabetic patient with ankle swelling. T1-weighted image (a) shows abnormal low signal posterior to the talus. Fat-suppressed T1-weighted image (b) was obtained after the IV administration of gadolinium. Note the bright enhancing peripheral rim (arrows) surrounding the abscess.
high signal intensity on T1-weighted images. They are low signal on fat-saturated T2-weighted and short tau inversion recovery (STIR) sequences and are described as hypointense or low signal intensity. In contrast, simple uid or edema is hypointense on T1-weighted images and hyperintense on T2-weighted, fat-saturated T2-weighted, and STIR sequences. Because IV gadolinium contrast and fat are both bright on T1-weighted images, contrast-enhanced images are often obtained using fat saturation techniques so that fat appears darker and gadolinium contrast is bright. This is par­ticularly useful in the foot, where fatty marrow predomi­nates. Nonetheless, it can be challenging to achieve homogeneous fat saturation in the foot, which, in turn, makes it difcult to evaluate for the presence or absence of contrast enhancement [104]. Optimal images are acquired by maxi­mizing image signal-to-noise and using it to achieve high
The rim is slightly thickened. Central nonenhancement conrms uid content. Enhancement is also seen in the adjoining portion of the talus, and the intervening talar cortex is thinned and irregular (open arrow­head). Because they abut the abscess, these ndings in the bone are highly suggestive of osteomyelitis. A Achilles, F bula, T talus
spatial resolution based on appropriately small elds of view, thin slices, and smaller imaging voxel sizes. However, imag­ing at high spatial resolution requires longer imaging times. Additional MR sequences that are currently being investi­gated for utility in the diabetic foot are diffusion-weighted sequences and dynamic-contrast-enhanced sequences. Diffusion-weighted (DWI) sequences, including the related apparent diffusion coefcient (ADC) sequences, highlight areas where diffusion of water is restricted, compared with areas where there is free diffusion of water. Thus, water within a muscle, tendon, solid tumor, or other solid tissues, where diffusion is typically restricted, would appear brighter on DWI images than water within a simple cyst, where water diffuses freely. Water within a proteinaceous abscess shows intermediate DWI signal. For this reason, diffusion-weighted images can be used to demonstrate abscesses in patients who
76
ab
https://t.me/med1917
M. G. Hochman and C. Connolly
Fig. 5.14 Marrow edema on MRI.Sagittal images of the ankle show marrow edema (*), which is (a) dark on T1-weighted image and (b) bright on STIR images. This marrow edema pattern is nonspecic and is similar to the marrow changes in osteomyelitis. However, this patient
a
sustained trauma to the anterior talus, and here, the marrow edema rep­resents a bone bruise. Specicity and accuracy can be improved by the administration of gadolinium as osteomyelitis frequently shows mar­row enhancement. C calcaneus, N navicular, T talus, TIB tibia
b
Fig. 5.15 Stress fracture on MRI.Sagittal T1-weighted (a) and STIR (b) MR images of the foot demonstrate cortical irregularity of the mid­diaphysis of the metatarsal bone (arrow). The marrow signal is abnor­mal, consistent with a marrow edema pattern: low signal on the T1-weighted image and high signal on the uid-sensitive STIR image.
The fracture line (arrow) remains dark on both sequences and is sur­rounded by bright edematous marrow on the STIR image. Marked soft tissue swelling surrounding the fracture is also better appreciated on the STIR images (b). C calcaneus, N navicular, TIB tibia, T talus
5 Imaging ofInfection intheDiabetic Foot
https://t.me/med1917
77
cannot tolerate IV gadolinium contrast [105]. Dynamic­contrast- enhanced sequences refer to rapid sequential T1-weighted or fat-saturated T1-weighted images obtained through a given area in rapid succession following a bolus of IV gadolinium contrast. Signal intensity within tissue increases as IV contrast washes in to it and decreases as con­trast washes out of it. This pattern of contrast wash-in/wash­out can be charted as a time-intensity curve and can be analyzed with mathematical pharmacokinetic models to yield quantities reecting tissue vascularity, vessel leakage, and volume of interstitial space. These properties have been used to distinguish tumors and areas of infection or inam­mation and to assess response to treatment and have recently been proposed for assessing pathologies in the diabetic foot, including a proposed potential distinction between osteomy­elitis and neuropathic arthropathy [106]. The utility of short­ened MRI protocols for more rapid detection of osteomyelitis is also being explored [107].
Unlike CT, MRI provides high intrinsic soft tissue con­trast, without the use of intravenous contrast agents. As a result, exogenous intravenous (IV) contrast is not required in order to detect changes in soft tissue infection or osteomyeli­tis—these processes appear as an abnormal edema-like sig­nal in the soft tissues and bones, respectively. However, IV contrast can play a role in the imaging of infection in the diabetic foot by delineating soft tissue and intraosseous abscesses, highlighting stulous tracts between ulcers and bone, and facilitating MR angiography. Gadolinium concen­trates in areas of infectious or noninfectious inammation because of both increased vascularity and increased “poros­ity” of arteries in those settings and produces a hyperintense (bright) signal on T1-weighted images.
Most contrast agents employed for clinical MR imaging are based on the paramagnetic element gadolinium. Historically, gadolinium contrast has been better tolerated than the iodinated forms of contrast used for CT scans and catheter angiography, with lower risks of anaphylactic reac­tions and nephrotoxicity. However, more recently, gadolinium- based contrast media have been linked to the disease nephrogenic systemic brosis (NSF) in patients with severely impaired renal function [108, 109]. Nephrogenic systemic brosis (NSF), formerly known as nephrogenic brosing dermopathy, is a disguring and potentially disabling or fatal disorder characterized by symmetric, coalescing, and indurated skin plaques, which can also cause joint contractures and brosis in internal organs. The link between intravenous gadolinium contrast and NSF is stron­ger for certain gadolinium formulations and seems to be dose related [70, 74]. Due to concerns over NSF, the Federal Drug Administration (FDA) now recommends screening patients prior to the administration of a gadolinium-based contrast agent to identify individuals with acute or severe chronic renal insufciency [72, 110, 111]. Once a patient is deter-
mined to be at risk, renal function should be assessed by laboratory testing and the calculation of eGFR [11, 72, 110]. Of note, while follow-up dialysis after the administration of gadolinium contrast does improve the clearance of the gado­linium contrast agent, there is no evidence that it improves safety in terms of preventing NSF [72, 109, 110]. Nonetheless, in patients already on dialysis, when gadolinium administra­tion cannot be avoided, the ACR Committee on Drugs and Contrast Media recommends that elective MRI examinations using gadolinium-based contrast agents be performed before regularly scheduled dialysis, if feasible [72]. Most recently, new concerns regarding gadolinium-based contrast agents have been raised by the observation that residual gadolinium accumulates in patients’ brain and bone, even in patients with normal renal function, though the clinical signicance of this nding remains to be determined [72, 112]. A more thorough discussion of these complex and evolving topics is provided in the American College of Radiology Manual on Contrast Media.
Findings
On MR images, cellulitis appears as an ill-dened area in the subcutaneous fat that is of low signal on T1-weighted and high signal on STIR and T2-weighted sequences [17] (Fig.5.2). It can be seen as both a strand-like reticulated pattern of high T2 signal extending along septa between lob­ules of fat and of more conuent dense high T2 signal. However, this signal pattern is nonspecic and is common to both cellulitis and non-cellulitic edema. Gadolinium administration may identify uncomplicated cellulitis, which typically shows a uniform enhancement of subcutaneous edema [16].
Abscess presents as a focal lesion that is low signal on T1-weighted images and high signal on T2-weighted and STIR images. Without intravenous gadolinium, an abscess may not be distinguishable from dense soft tissue edema seen in severe cellulitis or from soft tissue phlegmon [113]. Following the administration of intravenous gadolinium, an abscess demonstrates peripheral or rim enhancement, demar­cating the uid collection within (Fig.5.13). The enhancing rim is believed to correspond to the granulation tissue in the pseudocapsule. However, rim enhancement is a sensitive but nonspecic sign for abscess and can be seen in necrotic tumors, seromas, ruptured popliteal cysts, and hematomas [113]. Pus in the center of the abscess can have variable sig­nal intensity, depending on its contents. Simple uid will have low T1/high T2 signal, but abscesses often have high T1 signal content due to the presence of a proteinaceous mate­rial within the uid. Like proteinaceous uid, hemorrhage can also appear high signal on T1-weighted images. Because this high T1 signal intensity appearance could be mistaken for gadolinium enhancement, a comparison of pre- and post­contrast images becomes essential. Recently, the use of dif-
78
https://t.me/med1917
M. G. Hochman and C. Connolly
fusion-weighted imaging to detect abscesses, without requiring the use of IV gadolinium contrast, has been dem­onstrated [105].
The diagnosis of septic arthritis is generally made clini­cally and is conrmed by percutaneous joint aspiration or surgery [16]. The MR appearance of septic arthritis consists of joint effusion, often with synovial thickening, intra­articular debris, and surrounding reactive marrow and soft tissue edema. Following the administration of intravenous gadolinium, there is intense synovial enhancement. Peri­articular reactive marrow edema may demonstrate gadolin­ium enhancement even in the absence of osteomyelitis [16]. This constellation of ndings is suggestive of, but not spe­cic for, infection and can also be seen in inammatory con­ditions such as rheumatoid arthritis and seronegative arthropathies.
The primary MRI nding in osteomyelitis is abnormal marrow signal that enhances [114]. The abnormal marrow appears low signal (dark) on T1-weighted images and high signal (bright) on uid-sensitive images, such as fat- saturated T2-weighted and STIR images, typically with ill-dened margins (Fig. 5.1; Table 5.5). Following the intravenous administration of gadolinium contrast, the abnormal marrow enhances and is seen as a bright area on the fat-suppressed T1-weighted images. Changes in marrow signal intensity can be detected as early as 1–2days after the onset of infec­tion [36, 114]. High T2 or high STIR marrow signal alone— without a corresponding low T1 signal—is considered a nonspecic nding. The classic appearance of osteomyelitis is high T2 or STIR marrow signal, together with concordant corresponding conuent low T1 signal in a geographic med­ullary distribution [115]. Collins etal. found that alternative
Table 5.5 MRI ndings of osteomyelitis
Primary signs
Hyperintense (bright) marrow signal on STIR or fat-saturated T2-weighted sequence
• Especially when very high signal (closer to the signal of joint uid)
Hypointense (dark) marrow signal on T1-weighted sequence
• Conuent low T1 signal in a geographic medullary distribution is the most suggestive of osteomyelitis
• Other patterns of low T1 signal are less specic, but osteomyelitis is not excluded
Enhancing marrow on postcontrast T1-weighted sequence accompanies osteomyelitis but is not specic
Secondary MR signs
Periosteal reaction Subperiosteal abscess Periostitis (manifested by periosteal enhancement) Cortical interruption/cortical destruction Ulcer contiguous with abnormal marrow Sinus tract contiguous with abnormal marrow
patterns of low T1 marrow signal, e.g., subcortical distribu­tion or hazy, reticulated patterns, are suspicious of, but not specic for, osteomyelitis [115]. However, Duryea et al. found that 61% of patients with diabetic foot ulcers, who had only high T2 bone marrow edema signal on presentation, without a corresponding conuent low T1 signal, were even­tually diagnosed with osteomyelitis. Based on this, they sug­gest that patients demonstrating only T2 signal abnormality under a diabetic ulcer—when there are accompanying clini­cal parameters for osteomyelitis—deserve to be treated aggressively as presumed “early osteomyelitis” [116]. Sax et al. investigated patients with suspected osteomyelitis whose initial MRI demonstrated bone marrow edema (high T2 or high STIR signal) without a corresponding low T1 sig­nal. They found that patients with pedal ulcers and suspected osteomyelitis who had very high T2 or STIR signal—closer to the high signal of uid in joint effusions (measured as a ratio of marrow-to-joint uid T2/STIR signal)—were more likely to go on to develop low T1 marrow signal indicative of osteomyelitis [117]. Jang etal. performed multivariate anal­ysis in 118 patients with suspected osteomyelitis and also found that conuent low T1 marrow signal was a reliable nding for osteomyelitis. In addition, irrespective of the presence of low T1 marrow signal, they also found that addi­tional factors suggestive of osteomyelitis were the presence of a deep ulcer and very high T2 marrow signal, equivalent in signal intensity to uid [118]. Secondary signs of osteo­myelitis include cortical interruption, periostitis (seen as enhancement at the margins of the periosteum), and a cuta­neous ulcer or sinus tract in contiguity with the abnormal marrow [16, 119]. Intravenous contrast does not identify new areas of signal abnormality compared with fat-saturated T2-weighted or STIR sequences [114]. Rather, its impor­tance is that it helps demonstrate soft tissue and intraosseous abscesses and outline stulous tracts between osteomyelitis and the skin [114]. Intravenous contrast also allows for the distinction of joint uid from thickened synovium. Morrison et al. reported improved sensitivity and specicity for the detection of osteomyelitis using gadolinium contrast—88% sensitivity and 93% specicity for contrast-enhanced studies vs. 79% sensitivity and 53% specicity for noncontrast­enhanced images [113]. The sensitivity and specicity of various secondary signs for identifying osteomyelitis were sinus tracts (32/85%), cellulitis (84/30%), soft tissue abscess (26/74%), ulcers (41/81%), and cortical tract or disruption (86/78%) [119]. A negative MRI effectively excludes osteo­myelitis [120]. The sensitivity and specicity of MRI for the detection of osteomyelitis compiled from ve studies is 96% and 87%, respectively [79, 121124]. Sensitivities and speci- cities for detection of osteomyelitis in diabetic individuals are lower, respectively 82% and 80%, in large part due to
5 Imaging ofInfection intheDiabetic Foot
https://t.me/med1917
79
neuroarthopathic changes [113, 125]. Ahmadi etal. identi­ed features that can help distinguish between osteomyelitis and neuropathic arthropathy [126]. They examined 128 neu­ropathic joints in 63 patients and concluded that features more indicative of infection were sinus tract, replacement of soft-tissue fat, uid collection, or extensive marrow abnor­mality, while features indicative of neuroarthropathy without infection were a thin rim of peripheral enhancement around an effusion, the presence of subchondral cysts, or the pres­ence of intra-articular loose bodies. The “ghost sign” is an informal but commonly discussed sign thought to be indica­tive of neuroarthropathy with superimposed osteomyelitis; the absence of a “ghost sign” argues against the presence of a superimposed infection [127]. The ghost sign occurs when bony margins that are indistinct on T1-weighted MR images become distinctly visible on T2-weighted or postcontrast images. In the uninfected neuroarthropathic foot, the ghost sign is absent because bones that are truly resorbed or destroyed in the neuroarthropathic foot cannot become visi­ble on T2-weighted or postcontrast images. In the setting of infection, the nonvisualization of bony margins on T1 likely represents artifact due to dense marrow edema.
Because of its high negative predictive value, MRI can facilitate an accurate depiction of the maximum possible extent of marrow involvement by osteomyelitis. As such, MRI can help in the planning of foot-sparing surgical proce­dures [113, 128]. Marrow involvement is well demonstrated on uid-sensitive images, such as fat-saturated T2-weighted or STIR sequences.
Its advantages notwithstanding, MRI has several impor­tant limitations. MRI of the infected diabetic foot yields a signicant number of false positive diagnoses. The kind of abnormal marrow signal associated with osteomyelitis can also be seen with neuroarthropathy, including silent bone stress injuries associated with diabetic neuroarthropathy, bone contusions, fractures (Figs.5.14 and 5.15), and, occa­sionally, osteonecrosis. The hyperemic phase of osteoar­thropathy may display enhancing marrow edema indistinguishable from osteomyelitis. Intense soft tissue inammation may also give rise to reactive edema in the adjoining bone in the absence of osteomyelitis. False nega­tive contrast enhancement can occur in the setting of vascu­lar insufciency [129]. The utility of MR imaging for the following response to the treatment of osteomyelitis remains to be dened. Due to its high sensitivity for the detection of soft tissue and marrow edema, MRI ndings can be expected to lag behind the clinical response in the treatment of soft tissue infection and osteomyelitis. As noted above, the use of gadolinium contrast in patients with severe renal failure is now generally contraindicated.
MRI/MR Spectroscopy ofEarly Structural andMetabolic Changes intheDiabe tic Foot
In addition to MRI for the assessment of bone and soft tis­sue infection, there is great interest in the use of anatomic MRI, MR spectroscopy, and MR elastography [130136] to identify early changes of structural and metabolic pathology in the diabetic foot. In vivo MR spectroscopy (MRS) com­plements conventional anatomic MRI by generating mag­netic resonance spectra that quantify the physical properties and relative concentrations of various tissue metabolites. MRS can be performed on 1.5 or 3.0 Tesla clinical MR scanners that are tted with spectroscopy software and can acquire signal from hydrogen 1H protons or from other pro­tons, such as phosphorus 31P, carbon 13C, uorine 19F, nitro­gen 15N, or sodium 23Na [137]. Hydrogen protons are abundant and provide high signal, but other species of pro­tons are less abundant, with inherently low signal, resulting in more limited spatial and temporal resolution. MRS data can be obtained as a spectrum from a single-image voxel or, when sufcient signal is present, can be depicted as a spec­troscopic image. Examples of metabolites that can be evalu­ated with proton 1H MR spectroscopy include choline (constituent of cell membranes), various lipids, sugars, amino acids, and neurotransmitter precursors and break­down products. Phosphorus 31P MR spectroscopy can be employed to assess energetics of muscles and other tissues and, indirectly, can be used to quantify intracellular pH [138141]. Thus, MR spectroscopy is well suited to the evaluation of fat content (1H) and, also, the energetics and pH (31P) of muscles in the lower extremity. Phosphocreatine (PCr) serves as the energy reservoir that maintains adenos­ine triphosphate (ATP) concentration at levels required for normal cellular function. Inorganic phosphate (Pi) is a metabolite produced from the hydrolysis of ATP to adenos­ine diphosphate ADP [133]. When there is insufcient sup­ply of oxygen to muscles due to, for example, intense exercise in healthy individuals or pathologic tissue isch­emia, the ratio of phosphocreatine to inorganic phosphorus (PCr/Pi ratio) decreases [133]. (In some reports, the inverse ratio, Pi/PCR, is reported.) Using 31P MRI scans to measure the concentrations of inorganic phosphate and phosphocre­atine, Greenman etal. observed higher Pi/PCr ratios in the feet of nonneuropathic (0.41 [0.10]) and neuropathic dia­betic patients (0.58 [0.26]) than in a nondiabetic control group (0.20 [0.06]; p<0.0001), indicating relatively reduced energy reserves in resting foot muscles in the presence of diabetes [134]. They also measured the percentage of oxy­gen-saturated hemoglobin, S(HSI)O2, in the resting foot using medical hyperspectral imaging, and this was found to be higher in the control and nonneuropathic groups than in