Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_3706_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
33 Мб
Скачать
460
https://t.me/med1917
E. Shiah et al.
baric oxygen. The wound environment should be kept moist in order to promote granulation, angiogenesis, extracellular matrix remodeling, and robust cell proliferation from the wound base to the surface (Table25.2).
While adjunctive therapies to wound dressings may improve healing outcomes, the most important consideration to any form of dressing is wound ofoading. Minimizing both vertical and plantar shear stress will ensure the longev­ity of newly forming granulation and scar tissue. It can be achieved through various means including reducing activity and bed rest, therapeutic shoes with customized in-soles, padded dressings, cushioned or half shoes, and total contact casting (TCC) as the gold-standard. Choosing an ofoading strategy must be tailored to the individual patient’s mobility,
Table 25.2 Adjuncts for secondary intention healing
Usage Success
Growth factors
Cell-based materials Tissue replacement options include allografts,
Platelet- derived growth factor The only approved, isolated growth factor
treatment is becaplermin (Regranex, by Johnson & Johnson), which is a recombinant platelet- derived growth factor (PDGF). It promotes chemotaxis and differentiation of broblasts and smooth muscle cells, stimulation of collagen production, and ECM strengthening. It is applied as a topical gel in varying concentrations
Fibroblast growth factor (FGF) FGF can be administered as a topical spray
and can be either basic FGF (bFGF), which promotes angiogenesis, or acidic FGF (aFGF) which promotes migration and proliferation of broblasts
Epidermal growth factor (EGF) EGF can be administered topically as a gel
(Regen-D), topical cream (Actovegin), or intralesional injection (Heberprot-P). EGF broadly promotes skin healing and is primarily expressed on keratinocytes
Granulocyte- colony stimulating factor (GCSF)
Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)
G-CSF can be injected subcutaneously, to enhance the immune response to wound infection, or topically as a gel. G-CSF can activate and enhance the function of T-lymphocytes, dendritic cells, macrophages, endothelial cells, and broblasts, among other cell types VEGF is available as a topical gel (Telbermin) and is a key regulator of angiogenesis
such as Apligraf, which is a bilayered skin equivalent consisting of a bovine matrix populated by neonatal broblasts and epithelial cells. Another dermal skin substitute (Dermagraft) contains human broblasts on a bioabsorbable scaffold. Other substitutes include Grax, a human placental membrane­derived wound matrix, and TheraSkin, which is a cadaveric combined dermal-epidermal replacement
wound location and depth, and a patient’s willingness to modify their lifestyle. Among all forms of off-loading, TCCs or non-removable knee-high devices offer the most robust support and reduction in healing times [37]. The primary drawbacks of TCC include inability to assess the wound as frequently, as well as secondary foot ulceration from a poorly tting cast [38].
Successful wound healing by secondary intention may include any combination of the adjunctive therapies listed in Table25.2, along with adequate wound debridement, dress­ings, and maintenance. Key limitations of secondary inten­tion are recurrence of infection if the wound is left open. Wounds with exposed tendon or bone are more suited for ap coverage.
Studies generally show success of PDGF in expediting healing compared to controls. Though not always measured, wound size, optimization of glycemic control, and adequate wound ofoading determine its success
For the diabetic foot, topical FGF trends towards shortening healing time. Results have not shown statistical signicance, except for application at high doses or when combining bFGF with an articial dermis All studies have shown a signicant improvement in healing outcomes and decrease in healing time across all forms of EGF.In fact, EGF may be most successful in its application towards diabetic foot ulcers, compared to other forms of wound types Results of injected G-CSF show mixed signicance, with generally positive results on resolution of cellulitis, reduction of ulcer volume, and potentially fewer amputation rates
One study showed a nonsignicant reduction in healing time
All cellular matrices tested have shown improved healing rates and faster healing times compared to controls, though cost-effectiveness and signicance of outcomes are mixed
25 Reconstruction oftheDiabetic Foot
https://t.me/med1917
Table 25.2 (continued)
Usage Success
Acellular materials Like cellular matrices, acellular matrices
provide a matrix, typically composed of collagen, oxidized regenerated cellulose, or other extracellular components for proliferating cells to inhabit
Oxygen therapy Oxygen can be applied either topically or by
hyperbaric therapy. Oxygen availability, which is typically impaired in the setting of diabetic foot ulcers, is critical for cell proliferation, collagen synthesis, formation of granulation tissue, and killing of bacteria. Particularly useful for treating wounds with osteomyelitis refractory to antibiotic therapy, hyperbaric oxygen vastly increases the amount of dissolved oxygen (and thus oxygen availability) in blood to be delivered to healing tissue
461
Acellular matrices have consistently shown to signicantly increase rates of wound healing and expedite wound healing times. One study has shown acellular dermal matrices (ADM) with NPWT to be successful in these settings, once weight and pressure ofoading is achieved Topically delivered oxygen has shown limited efcacy with some improvement in healing rates and times. Hyperbaric oxygen has been more widely used and some studies have shown signicant improvements in short term healing rates, but its effectiveness in improving long-term wound outcomes has not yet been established
Delayed primary closure, sometimes called closure by tertiary intention, involves waiting for a wound to show no signs of infection (typically at least 48h) before completing a closure with direct tissue approximation [39]. If prolonged conservative wound care takes place, such as NPWT, there is often loss of domain, skin retraction, and adherence, pre­cluding the option of a simple closure.
Closure in layers from deep to supercial is preferred. Liberal use of drains minimizes the risk of seroma forma­tion. Precise dermoepidermal tissue apposition is critical. Excessive undermining increases dead space and disrupts vascularity.
Options to assist with delayed primary closure may also be considered, such as the use of tissue expanders, vessel loops, and other progressive tension closure methods.
Skin Grafts
Skin grafting is a simple coverage option and can be har­vested as either a split-thickness or full-thickness graft. Regardless of the type of graft, the wound bed must be ade­quate to allow for graft take/vascularization., adequate off­loading, and optimization of vascular supply. Finally, the patient’s nutritional status in accordance with glycemic con­trol must be optimized [40].
Common donor sites for split grafts include the lateral or medial thigh [41]. These options are suitable for non-weight bearing regions of the foot (i.e., the dorsal aspect) or in-step and are typically split-thickness grafts (STSG). For the weight-bearing plantar side, which also possesses a thicker glabrous layer, grafts harvested from the glabrous instep can be considered but ap options are more likely to be indi-
cated. A thickness of 15/1000 is commonly used. STSGs despite having limitations in weight-bearing areas can drasti­cally reduce the wound surface requiring ap coverage. In the diabetic patient, STSGs have been shown to heal within 5weeks in 85.5% of patients [42]. NPWT is almost always used pre and post grafting and improves graft survival to 93% [43].
NPWT can also be applied in full-thickness skin grafts (FTSG). FTSGs, which include the full dermis layer, offer more robust coverage, especially if glabrous skin is har­vested. FTSGs require a more reliable blood supply to sur­vive. Furthermore, the epidermis will often slough in the initial postoperative period, making wound assessment more challenging. Donor site breakdown is a signicant concern.
Local Flaps
Local aps are classied based on their vascular supply. Random aps are those with blood supply that depends on the subdermal plexus and not a specic artery. They often include epidermis, dermis, and subcutaneous tissue, and sometimes fascia and muscle. This makes them a good option for the plantar surface of the foot due to their ability to withstand shear forces [44, 45]. Axial aps are based on a known artery that directly supplies a specic skin territory [46]. Pedicled perforator aps are local aps based on spe­cic musculocutaneous or septocutaneous perforators.
Common ap design options are summarized in Table25.3. Advancement aps involve advancing the tissue in one single direction with perfusion coming from the sub­dermal plexus and local perforators. In surgery of the foot, these aps are often used to cover metatarsal head defects at
462
Pivot point
https://t.me/med1917
Table 25.3 Local ap design
Design Common uses
Rotation ap
E. Shiah et al.
Plantar surface of the foot where the ap is elevated off the plantar fascia and rotated in position
Defect
Line of greatest tension
Transposition ap
Advancement ap
Lateral and medial malleoli or exposed tibial-talar
b
120°
a
60°
b
1
c
a
1
c
a
fusion
Plantar surface of the foot
b
c
25 Reconstruction oftheDiabetic Foot
https://t.me/med1917
463
the plantar or medial forefoot areas or the midfoot area [44,
Pedicled Flaps
47]. Rotation aps pivot around a xed point and are typi-
cally used to cover defects in the midfoot or hindfoot areas [4850]. Transposition aps combine the techniques of advancement and rotational aps requiring less tissue mobi­lization; however, a skin graft is usually needed to cover the donor defect (also called secondary defect). Transposition aps are used to cover larger areas of the midfoot, hindfoot, heel, and malleoli [47] (Table25.1, Fig.25.1).
Similar to local aps, pedicled aps are a suitable recon­structive option for small defects that have an unfavorable recipient bed for skin grafting [45]. They require shorter operative times compared to free aps while providing appropriate coverage and aesthetic outcomes [45, 51]. Additionally, studies have found no statistically signicant difference in complications (e.g., hematoma, wound dehis-
ab c
de f
Fig. 25.1 Advancement ap: Patient presenting with Charcot neuro­arthropathy (a), after drainage revision surgery utilizing advancement ap (b) with good outcome at follow-up visit (c). Rotational ap: patient presenting with nonhealing wound (d) after debridement, a revi­sion surgery with a single fasciocutaneous rotation ap based on the medial plantar artery ap (e) with a good outcome at follow-up visit (f). Transposition ap: patient who presented with gas gangrene and
osteomyelitis of the right hallux (g), after amputation of the hallux and debridement, single transposition ap harvested dorsally with plantar tissue was advanced to cover the rst metatarsal site, the donor site was covered with a bilayer meshed collagen acellular dermal replacement (h) with good healing post-operatively (i). This gure is quoted from Patel [46] published in Local Random Flaps for the Diabetic Foot by Elsevier, copyright 2022. Reprinted with permission from Elsevier
464
hi
https://t.me/med1917
g
Fig. 25.1 (continued)
E. Shiah et al.
cence, infection, partial or full ap necrosis) and a slightly higher success rate for limb reconstruction with pedicled aps compared to free aps [51].
Muscle Flaps
Lower Leg and Ankle: In the lower leg and ankle, only a small portion of the muscle can safely be transferred in a muscle ap as most of the lower leg muscles are a type IV muscle (Mathes and Nahai classication) with segmental minor pedicles (the exception being the soleus muscle). These aps are most useful for reconstructing small defects of the lower leg and ankle. For example, aps fashioned from the extensor hallicus longus, extensor digitorum longus, or peroneus tertius muscles, all of which are based on the ante­rior tibial artery, can be used to reconstruct small (typically <3 × 6 cm) anteromedial ankle defects. From the anterior portion of the leg, the anterior tibialis muscle ap can be designed to cover linear anterior defects by itself or in con­junction with a soleus ap to cover larger, longitudinal defects of the middle-third and distal-third of the leg. Given its role as chief dorsiexor of the foot and its segmental blood supply, transposition of the entire anterior tibialis mus­cle is not recommended [52]. However, distal portions of the muscle can be used to cover defects up to 6–8cm in size [53]. The peroneus brevis muscle supplied by the peroneal artery can also be used as it is expendable, without signi­cant functional decit. It can be harvested in a proximal or distal-based fashion, allowing reconstruction of small to moderately sized defects in the anterolateral distal leg and ankle [54]. Finally, the soleus can be used in the distal lower leg. As the only type II muscle in this region, its blood supply
comes from branches of the popliteal artery (proximally), the posterior tibial artery (medially), and the peroneal artery (lat­erally). The minor distal pedicles can be divided, leaving only the proximal pedicles intact so that the muscle ap can be rotated into place for larger or more anterior defects of the distal leg. It can be harvested as a hemi-soleus for smaller defects [55].
Foot: In contrast to the lower leg, muscles in the foot are slightly more reliable candidates for pedicled aps due to a type II blood supply with a dominant pedicle and several distal minor pedicles. Based on the lateral plantar artery, both the abductor digiti minimi (ADM) and exor digito­rum brevis (FDB) muscle aps can be used to cover defects of the plantar heel. The ADM ap can also be utilized for coverage for calcaneal osteomyelitis, lateral malleolar defects, and even midfoot reconstruction; detachment of the muscle origins on the lateral calcaneus may increase mobilization to cover further defects, such as the midfoot [56]. In contrast to the small arc of the ADM ap, the FDB can be pivoted to reach defects of the Achilles tendon. Its best utility is with deep defects that can be covered primar­ily with local glabrous skin [56]. Defects of the lateral mal­leolus and lateral calcaneus can also be reconstructed with an extensor digitorum brevis ap based on the lateral tarsal artery. Harvesting the ap on the dorsalis pedis artery can widen the arc of rotation [57]. Finally, the abductor hallucis muscle ap, supplied by the medial plantar artery, can har­vested to cover defects of the plantar heel, medial heel, and medial ankle. For large midfoot and plantar heel defects, combining abductor hallucis and abductor digiti minimi aps can be helpful.
25 Reconstruction oftheDiabetic Foot
https://t.me/med1917
465
Fasciocutaneous Flaps
Certain regions of the foot and ankle, such as the midfoot or forefoot, benet from thinner and more pliable ap options to meet both functional and aesthetic needs [58]. Fasciocutaneous aps are a suitable reconstructive option for such areas. Recently, perforator-based designs have gained popularity as they have a greater arc of motion, such as the propeller ap [59].
Lower Leg and Ankle: Two aps based on retrograde ow, the retrograde sural ap and the retrograde anterior tibial ap, are suitable approaches to lower leg reconstruction with fasciocutaneous aps [57, 60]. The retrograde sural ap receives retrograde arterial ow through septocutaneous per­forators originating from the peroneal artery that directly anastomose with the median supercial sural artery. These perforators are located about 4–7cm above the lateral mal­leolus. The sural nerve and lesser saphenous vein are impor­tant landmarks during dissection, and the ap may be harvested as a neurocutaneous ap. The retrograde sural ap is a versatile ap that can be used to reconstruct defects of the anterior distal leg and calcaneus, as well as the posterior heel, lateral and medial malleolus, and dorsal surface of the foot [60]. The retrograde anterior tibial ap which receives blood supply via retrograde ow from the anterior tibial artery can also be used to reconstruct defects of the anterior lower leg and dorsal surface of the foot. Since the tibialis anterior plays such a major role in foot dorsiexion, only the lower half of the artery can be safely harvested for the ap, limiting its range. The lateral supramalleolar ap based on a perforator of the peroneal artery is another suitable option for defects of the lateral malleolus and anterior ankle, although the retrograde sural ap appears to have a slightly higher success rate in these areas [61]. Finally, propeller aps based on perforators of the posterior tibial artery or peroneal artery can be used for defects of the malleoli.
Foot: In the foot, the medial plantar ap supplied by the medial plantar artery provides ideal tissue for the coverage of plantar and medial ankle defects. It is particularly suitable for reconstruction of heel defects as it offers matching gla­brous tissue. The medial plantar nerve may be harvested to provide a sensate heel ap. The arterial supply to the lateral calcaneal ap is the calcaneal branch of the peroneal artery; this ap is useful for the reconstruction of defects of the Achilles tendon, posterior heel, and lateral malleolus [62,
63]. The length of this ap can be increased by harvesting it
as an “L” shape posterior to and below the lateral malleolus. For defects of the dorsum of the foot, a dorsalis pedis ap can be utilized; however, it is important to keep in mind that the distal ends of a larger proximally based ap may be vul­nerable to fail due to anatomic variations of the rst dorsal metatarsal artery [52, 64]. As in the lower leg, propeller aps can also be fashioned for soft tissue reconstruction of the
foot. Based on the perforators, propeller aps may be used for plantar forefoot defects (medial plantar artery) or calca­neal defects (branches of the peroneal artery) [65]. For distal forefoot defects, a let toe ap supplied by the digital artery can be utilized for small forefoot web space ulcers and distal forefoot defects. Standard let toe aps involve isolating and leaving two digital arteries while removing nail bed, phalan­geal bones, tendons, and volar plates (Fig.25.2).
Free Flap Reconstruction
As the eld of microsurgery continues to evolve, free ap reconstruction for lower extremity defects has become more commonplace [66]. Earlier free ap reconstruction is advo­cated in traumatic injuries [6769]. In diabetic foot recon­struction, free tissue transfer is delayed until the wound bed is clean, nutrition and glycemic control are optimized, and the patient is medically safe to undergo a prolonged anesthetic.
Options include muscle, fasciocutaneous, and skin-only free aps. Muscle aps are often used for larger soft tissue defects that benet from obliteration of dead space as well as cases that have an irregularly shaped wound bed, such as near-circumferential defects. Their supposed superior vascu­larity was initially speculated to lower infection rates by allowing for improved bacterial clearance and antibiotic delivery. However, more recent studies have identied no statistically signicant differences compared to fasciocuta­neous aps [7073]. While muscle aps are generally more straightforward to raise, they result in greater donor site mor­bidity and also necessitate a skin graft. Fasciocutaneous aps are easier to monitor post-operatively for viability and are better suited for shallow defects, such as in the distal third of the leg and around the ankle.
Muscle Free Flaps
For muscle ap selection, it is critical to consider the degree of functional loss after free tissue transfer. The latissimus dorsi free ap based off the thoracodorsal artery can be an attractive option to provide bulk for larger tissue defects and can also be harvested with a skin paddle. Shoulder strength however commonly does not recover fully and some patients could experience persistent limitation on activities of daily living, especially those who are crutch or wheelchair depen­dent [74, 75]. It is also commonly too bulky for the foot and ankle where good shoe t is critical for quality of life, although in most cases, these aps are expected to thin out over time. Similarly, the free vastus lateralis ap is useful to provide bulk but with potential concerns for quadriceps weakness and knee instability [76]. Regardless, muscle aps generally have limited variable perforator anatomy resulting expedient dissection.
466
https://t.me/med1917
E. Shiah et al.
Fig. 25.2 Fillet of great toe to cover medial foot defect with exposed bone in an immunosuppressed patient. A small, non-weightbearing area was covered with a dermal substitute which eventually reepithelialized without further intervention
The gracilis free ap on the other hand offers minimal donor site morbidity and loss of function. Harvest time of the ap and its branches off the medial femoral circumex ves­sels can parallel that of a pedicled ap with an overall high success rate [75, 77, 78]. In cases of unfavorable vascular anatomy encountered intraoperatively, the same incision site
can be converted to an adductor magnus free ap dissection [79]. Disadvantages of the free gracilis ap include its rela­tively short pedicle length, small vessel caliber, and its lim­ited size, although signicant size variability is often encountered. Preoperative ultrasound imaging can provide a useful size estimate (Fig.25.3).
25 Reconstruction oftheDiabetic Foot
https://t.me/med1917
467
The parascapular free ap is supplied by branches of the circumex scapular artery and is another useful ap, with a thick dermal layer [87]. It can provide a large ap territory while allowing for primary closure of the donor site [88]. Its vascular anatomy allows it to be harvested as a so-called chi­meric ap, with scapular bone and latissimus muscle for composite tissue defects requiring multiple different tissue types.
The radial forearm and lateral arm free aps can both be used for small to medium sized defects. As thin and pliable aps, they are particularly useful for allowing gliding such as tendon coverage as well as conforming to irregular contours of the foot and ankle [89]. The lateral arm ap is based on perforators from the posterior radial collateral artery and its donor site can be closed primarily. However, vessel caliber is small and pedicle length is short [90]. The radial forearm ap is an option for cases needing limb revascularization as it can be designed as a ow-through ap using the radial artery [91]. The main disadvantage is a conspicuous donor site typically requiring skin graft for closure and sacrice of a major artery to the hand which is less than ideal in the vasculopath [92].
The Supercial Circumex Iliac Artery Perforator ap (SCIP), harvested from the groin region, offers an incon­spicuous donor site and can be harvested as a thin ap in most patients, even if obese. Downsides are its variable vascular anatomy, short pedicle length, and smaller vessel caliber. Preoperative ultrasound makes dissection expedi­ent and safe [93].
Fig. 25.3 Unusually large gracilis ap encountered in a middle-aged diabetic patient that underwent free tissue transfer to reconstruct a plan­tar soft tissue defect. Due to recurrent breakdown, he eventually under­went below the knee amputation 3 years later. No signs of muscle atrophy of the denervated, transferred gracilis muscle were noted at the time of the amputation, contrary to traditional teaching
The serratus anterior and rectus abdominis muscle aps have many advantages for reconstruction in the foot and ankle with exposed nerve, tendon, and bone given their low prole. The serratus anterior has a long pedicle, allowing for more distant/proximal anastomosis [80, 81].
Cutaneous andFasciocutaneous Free Flaps
Free cutaneous and fasciocutaneous aps have become increasingly popular and are associated with lesser donor site morbidity and improved cosmetic outcomes. The most popu­lar fasciocutaneous ap in lower extremity reconstruction is the anterolateral thigh free ap for its high reliability and ver­satility [8284]. The ability to harvest a large skin paddle and long pedicle and adjust its thickness and volume based on requirements of the defect makes it a workhorse in lower extremity reconstruction [85]. It can also be congured as a ow-through ap to revascularize portions of the foot, and even neurotized to provide protective sensation [86].
Free Flap Principles andApproach
The overall success rate of free tissue transfer to the lower extremity is signicantly lower than to other parts of the body such as the breast or head and neck, likely due to compounding risk factors [94, 95]. For the diabetic foot, patients frequently have secondary conditions including extremity edema, uncontrolled diabetes, and peripheral vas­cular disease [96]. Pre-operative optimization with diuresis, glycemic control, and evaluation by a vascular surgeon is required. Screening for hypercoagulable state with appropri­ate hematological evaluation and anticoagulation therapy is critical for patients with a history of recurrent thrombosis.
After free ap selection based on soft-tissue requirement, length of pedicle, size of ap, and donor-site morbidity, con­siderations should be made for recipient vessel selection. An adequate size and quality of the vein is imperative to mini­mize risk of venous ap compromise. This can be assessed with venous mapping or magnetic resonance venogram, especially when there is prior injury/surgery or history of deep venous thrombosis. For recipient artery assessment, formal arteriograms, computed tomography angiography in conjunction with hand-held Doppler ultrasound are com­monly used, with MR angiography, duplex ultrasonography, and indocyanine green uorescence angiography as emerg­ing alternatives [97, 98].
468
https://t.me/med1917
E. Shiah et al.
There remains no clear data on outcome differences between end-to-end or end-to-side arterial anastomosis [99, 100]. However, end-to-end anastomosis is considered technically easier to perform while end-to-side technique preserves distal perfusion. Arterial anastomosis is rou­tinely performed using 9-0 to 11-0 sized sutures in the lower extremity using an operating microscope. For venous anastomosis, using a coupler device has gained popularity for its ease and expediency, with patency rates equivalent to a hand- sewn anastomosis [101].
The key elements in post-operative care involve close free ap monitoring and often a lower extremity dangling proto­col to gradually increase tolerance to increasing venous pres­sures. Although the use of blood thinning agents has not been shown to signicantly reduce incidence of vessel thrombo­sis, aspirin and heparin are commonly administered in the peri-operative setting [102, 103]. Clinical assessment includ- ing the use of a handheld Doppler remains the gold standard for free ap monitoring, although many advanced techniques such as tissue oximetry, surface temperature monitoring, and implantable Doppler have been employed [104]. Most cen­ters employ a dangle protocol and compression, although much variability exists [105, 106].
While the immediate focus of free tissue transfer in lower extremity reconstruction is ap survival, ap bulkiness and contour become important to address from a functional standpoint. Flaps are ideally harvested as thin as possible for use in the foot and ankle, but can be thinned secondarily.
Reconstruction by Location ofDefect
Reconstruction oftheForefoot
The forefoot is one of the most common sites of diabetic foot ulcers (about 70%) due to its highly functional, weight­bearing role. Forefoot ulcers occur in any location from the toes to the metatarsal heads.
Toe defects are often addressed with local wound care, limited debridements, and amputations. Adjunct procedures to address deformities such as hammer and claw toes and hallux deformities are often required to redistribute pressure and allow ulcers to heal [107, 108].
Metatarsal Heads
The aforementioned deformities, including hammer/claw toe, hallux valgus, hallux limitus, lesser toe arthropathies, and any sort of soft tissue atrophy, may precipitate ulceration at the metatarsal head [109, 110]. Beyond these factors, the most signicant driver of ulceration in this anatomic area is poor mobility of the Achilles tendon causing impaired dorsi-
exion (pes equinus) [111]. This is highly prevalent, with almost 89% of patients with diabetes having altered tendon collagen bril morphology [112]. This can be addressed by Achilles tendon lengthening or gastrocnemius recession. If amputations become necessary, llet aps can be used to cover the exposed metatarsal heads. Otherwise, local aps such as rotation-advancement aps taken from the glabrous surface can provide stable coverage.
Reconstruction oftheMidfoot
Primary defects of the midfoot are relatively rare and are usually found on the plantar surface. An advantage of this location is that there is more soft tissue between the skin and deep structures than in the forefoot. On the lateral surface of the midfoot, the peroneus longus tendon that courses around the promontory of the cuboid is important to identify because infection can spread here. On the medial surface, the tissue loss is usually in proximity to the abductor hallucis muscle which is important to preserve if at all possible.
Ulcers on the plantar midfoot are typically due to Charcot collapse of the midfoot plantar arch. Excisional debridement and surgical resection in the midfoot often result in a larger soft tissue decit precluding simple closure [113]. When pri­mary or delayed wound closure are not possible, split­thickness grafts can be employed although they are typically not used on weight-bearing surface. Local aps, pedicled aps, and free aps are considered. For small defects, local aps such as a rotation, bilobed, rhomboid, V-Y, or transposi­tion aps can be used. If a muscle ap is desired, a pedicled abductor hallucis ap medially or an abductor digiti minimi ap can be considered. For larger defects, V–Y aps and medially based rotation aps or pedicled, islandized medial plantar fasciocutaneous aps have been successfully used. If the defect is larger, then free aps are considered.
Reconstruction oftheHindfoot
The hindfoot encompasses the bony prominences of the cal­caneus, lateral malleolus, and medial malleolus, which can lead to ulceration secondary to pressure. These decubitus ulcers are difcult to treat with conservative measures because of the underlying bony prominence and often asso­ciated vascular disease. The most common site is the pos­terolateral aspect of the heel and is addressed with a partial calcanectomy and local closure. Flap coverage can be required, as well as an external xator to ofoad the foot until the wound has healed. Free aps are elegant alternatives and can have very limited morbidity (Fig.25.4).
25 Reconstruction oftheDiabetic Foot
https://t.me/med1917
469
Fig. 25.4 Reconstruction of a lateral hindfoot defect on the non-glabrous surface secondary to calcaneal osteomyelitis. A free SCIP (supercial circumex iliac artery perforator) ap was utilized and plugged into the lateral calcaneal vessels end-to-end
Reconstruction oftheDorsum
require split thickness skin grafts to the donor site [116]. The most suitable free aps for the dorsum of the foot are thin
Soft tissue reconstruction of the dorsum of the foot requires thin coverage [58] For a well vascularized wound bed, split thickness skin grafts are ideal. In the case of signicant extensor tendon or bone exposure, a skin substitute can be placed and eventually grafted. Pedicled ap options include
fasciocutaneous free aps such as the radial forearm, as well as thin muscle aps such as the serratus [58] (Fig. 25.5). Fascial aps such as the temporoparietal ap are not com­monly used but offer excellent contour and a glide layer for underlying tendons.
the extensor digitorum brevis which is broad, at muscle ap ideal for reconstructing defects of the anterior ankle and proximal dorsal foot [114, 115]. The reach of the ap can be
Reconstruction oftheAnkle
increased by dividing the dorsalis pedis artery above or below the tarsal vessel. The dorsalis pedis ap is thin and malleable to the recipient site without providing unnecessary bulk. The lateral supramalleolar ap offers similar benet for coverage of the anterior and lateral aspects of the dorsum of the foot. The drawback of these aps is that they can often
In the ankle, achieving thin yet stable soft tissue coverage allows for appropriate shoe wear and motion of the joint [58]. Skin grafts are therefore ideal in this location (Fig.25.6). In preparation, skin substitutes can promote formation of a suitable wound bed.