Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_884_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
34 Мб
Скачать
2 Informed Consent in Aesthetic and Plastic Surgery
https://t.me/med1917
Makdessian investigated the effectiveness of verbal informed consent during plastic aesthetic procedures as opposed to written informed consent. The study found that written informed consent is significantly better than verbal informed consent.
In the German-language literature, Fengler published a study which examined the formal legal framework of informed consent. One inter­esting aspect of informed consent regards financial perspectives. More­over, Fengler once again emphasizes the importance of photo docu­mentation as a central pillar of informed consen t.
In summary, it is established that informed consent plays an increas­ingly important role in aesthetic plastic surgery. Also, with regard to the increasing number of medico-legal cases, it is apparent that sur­geons who conduct rigorous informed consent practices can signifi­cantlyreducetheirriskofbecominginvolvedinlitigationrelatingto informed consent.
At our institution, we follow a procedure of duplicate patient informa­tion whereby the patient receives an extensive explanation of the treat­ment procedure and associated risks during the first consultation. As a rule, the first photo documentation is compiled at this meeting. On patient admission, which is generally one day prior to surgery, the pro­cedure is explained again in full and new photo documentation is com­piled. Both explanations are documented in writing in a standardized manner.
Posto peratively, a further detailed discussion between physician and patient takes place in which details relating to the operation as well as postoperative aftercare are discussed.
The specific risks associated with common procedures are listed below:
1. Liposuction: dimpling, thrombosis and embolism, con tour irregu­larities, small scars at liposuction insertion sites, allergic reactions resulting from the tumescence solution, hypoesthesia in the aspi­rated areas
2. Thigh and buttock lift: broadening scars, conto ur irregularities, side asymmetries, vascular and neural injuries
3. Abdominoplasty: preoperative ultrasound recommended to avoid internal abdominal organs, impaired wound healing, hematoma and seroma, malposition of the navel and umbilical necrosis, lateral “dog-ears”
8
4. Breast augmentation: sensory changes in the nipple region, impair-
https://t.me/med1917
ment in breast feeding, necrosis of skin, capsular fibrosis, displace­ment of prosthesis, asymmetry
5. Rhinoplasty: asymmetry , dimpling of nasal skin, injury to adjacent structures (teeth and dura at the roof), difficulties breathing, rhinitis sicca.Forrhinoplastyinparticular,itismandatorytoperformspe­cific nasal examinations which should include:
Rhinoscopic examination of the nose, including the nasopharynx,
a)
with an endoscopic system b) Rhinomanometry c) X-ray of the nose in two planes (occipitomental and lateral) d) Allergy tests e) Odor and taste perception tests f) Tube ventilation test g) Adequate external examination of the nose, e.g., measurement
of the nasofacial and nasolabial angles h) Facial morphometry
6. Rhytidectomy:facialnerveinjury,skindehiscenceandnecrosis, asymmetry, visible scars, shift of hairline, alopecia areata, traction at the ear lobes, hypopigmentation and hyperpigmentation
2 Informed Consent in Aesthetic and Plastic Surgery
7. Blepharoplasty: ectropion, asymmetry, blindness, keratitis sicca, vis­ible scarring. It is imperative to apply ophthalmologic ointment into the eye prior to the procedure
8. Fillers: conto ur irregularities, scars, surgical removal of injected material,granuloma,allergicreactions,infections
9. Otoplasty: hematoma, shape asymmetry, nerve injuries, infections
Guiding Principles in the Informed Consent Discussion
1. Persons Obliged to Obtain Informed Consent
The physician is obliged to obtain informed consent; this task may not be delegated to non-medical staff. The physician carrying out the pro­cedure does not necessarily need to obtain the informed consent him­self; however, he or she should ensure the suitability and specialist qualifications of the physician obtaining the informed consent. If sev­eral physicians are taking part in a procedure, each is obliged to obtain informed consent for their part.
9
2. Informed Consent in Non -medically Indicated Procedures
https://t.me/med1917
(Cosmetic Procedures)
In the case of cosmetic surgery, the patient must be given the opportu­nity to carefully consider the advantages and disadvantages of the pro­cedure. He or she must decide whether undergoing a risk-associated procedur e is preferable to his or her current situation.
3. Timing of the Informed Consent Discussion
The patient’s right to self-determination requires the informed consent discussion to take place at an appropriate time. This should ensure the patient freedom to decide without time pressure. In the case of outpa­tient surgery , informed consent on the day of the procedure is suffi­cient. For inpatients, informed consent should be given on the day prior to the procedure.
2 Informed Consent in Aesthetic and Plastic Surgery
4. Informed Consent for Foreign-Language Speakers
It is particularly important that the person in question is able to under­stand the doctor’s explanation. Where necessary, an interpreter should be made available.
5. Extent of the Informed Consent Discussion
The ph ysician must explain the main features of the treatment without, however, going into details. Therefore, the extent of the informed con­sent depends upon the urgency and severity of the procedure and its consequences, as well as the patient’s knowledge and level of education.
10
https://t.me/med1917
3 Rhinoplasty
https://t.me/med1917
Correction of Nasal Hump and/or “Long Nose” with the Endonasal Eversion Method (Mang Technique)
Introduction 15
Anatomical Overview 17
Instruments and Medication 18
Duplicate Patient Instruction 22
Nasal Examination 22
Photographic Documentation 23
Surgical Planning 23
Tumescence Injection T echn iq ue 26
Disinfection 28
Suction and Surgical Planning 28
Incision Line 30
3 Rhinoplasty
D´ecollement 32
Correction of the Nasal Tip with the Eversion Method 34
Nasal Shortening 38
Bump Ablation 40
Reshaping of the Tip 46
Suturing of the Mucosal Incisions 48
Resection of the “Mang Triangle” 50
Osteotomies 52
External Dressing 56
Postopera ti v e Medication and Precautions 58
Results 59
Tips and Tricks 62
The symbol indicates parts of the procedures shown in the video
13
Introduction
https://t.me/med1917
Rhinoplasty procedures are among the most difficult and most contro­versial operations in the area of plastic and aesthetic facial surgery . To achieve functional and aesthetic unity , the surgeon requires in-depth knowledge of both internal and functional structures. Experienced surgeons specializing in rhinoplasty usually have no prob­lem using an endonasal approach, but inexperienced surgeons and newcomers to aesthetic surgery may find that the extranasal approach initially gives them a better overview. However, this advantage can be rapidly negated by the unsatisfactory aesthetic results.
In the operations performed using an endonasal approach, we distin­guish between the vestibular margin incision, the intercartilaginous incision, and the intracartilaginous incision. For primary septorhino­plasty, the intercartilaginous and intracartilaginous approaches are generally adequate; the length of the nasal tip and the degree of nasal curvaturedesiredbythepatientareofdecisiveimportancehere.The vestibular margin incision is made only when the luxation technique is to be used. This technique is indicated for reoperations and for patients with broad nasal tips (ballooning phenomenon).
3 Rhinoplasty
When the operation is performed on patients with long noses, it is advisable to place the intracartilaginous incision as far as possible toward the vestibular margin in order to achieve an optimal lifting, shortening, and rotation of the nasal tip. If the surgeon has intimate knowledge of the internal nasal valves and the mucosa are left intact, large portions of the triangular and alar cartilage can be removed with­out compromising nasal function.
The entire cartilaginous and bony nasal framework can be pushed off, dissected, and reshaped using the endonasal approach. Moreover, the angle of the glabella can be exposed and corrected using this endo­scopic approach. Likewise, cartilage pieces of many different shapes and sizes can be reimplanted, incorporated by modeling to achieve a more aesthetic nasal tip and dorsum, and fixed in place with fibrin adhesive.
In our opinion, the main problems associated with the extranasal method are the insufficient exposure of the supratip region, the height­ened scar formation, and the distortions occurring in the nasal tip and soft tissue until wound healing is completed after about 6 months. Open rhinoplasty is necessary only in exceptional cases, e.g., pro-
15
3 Rhinoplasty
https://t.me/med1917
nounced cleft deformations, noses that have been largely destroyed by repeated unsuccessful operations, and extremely fleshy nasal tips. The majority (67%) of patients undergoing nose operations at our hospital are female patients between 18 and 40 years who have a long nose with abump.
Surgicalcorrectionofa“thin-skinned”longnosewithabumpisoneof the most rewarding aesthetic procedures, as the results are excellent. Patients usually feel much better in both their professio nal and their private life and in general have a more positive outlook. We have there­fore described the individual steps required for this type of nasal cor­rection in great detail in this chapter.
The basic prerequisites for successful rhinoplasty are as follows: com­prehensive and candid instruction of the patient, deflation of exagger­ated expectations, qualified professional training, and the aesthetic imagination of the surgeon.
16
23
https://t.me/med1917
22 21
20
19 18
17
16
15
14
13
12
11
Anatomical Overview (Fig. 3.1)
1. Cartilage of nasal septum
2. Lateral nasal cartilages
3. Lateral crus of greater alar cartilage
4. Medial crus of greater alar cartilage
5. Vestibule of nose
6. Cartilage of nasal septum
7. Anterior nasal spine
8. Dilator muscle of naris
9. Upper lip
10. Depressor muscle of nasal septum
11. Infraorbital nerve
12. Piriform aperture
13. Levator muscleof upper lip
and ala of nose
14. Angular artery
15. Compressor muscle of naris
16. Accessory nasal cartilages
17. Nasomaxillary suture
18. Supratrochlear nerve
19. Infratrochlear nerve
20. Nasal bones
21. Frontonasal suture
22. External nasal branches of anterior ethmoidal nerve
23. Procerus muscle
1
2 3
4
5
6 7
8 9 10
3 Rhinoplasty
17
3 Rhinoplasty
https://t.me/med1917
Instruments and Medication (Fig. 3.2–3.4)
1 Nasal speculum (short) 2 Bayonet- shaped forceps 3 Tweezers Adson-Br own 4 Delicate surgical tweezers 5 Columella clamp 6 Scalpel handle 7 Turned nose scissors Mang
)
Scissors for suture material
8 Dissecting scissors Wullstein
9 Bone rongeur Luer 10 Nasal scissors Heymann 11 Raspatory sharp Dieter 12 Raspatory sharp/blunt Freer 13 Raspatory McKenty 14 Delicate long single-pronged wound retractor 15 Fine long two-pronged wound retractor 16 Retractor blunt 17 Fine wound retractor sharp 18 Mallet Cottle 19 Chisel 4 mm 20 Chisel 10 mm 21 Largebonefile 22 Aspirator 23 Rongeur Weil-Blakesley
)
Elevator
24 Needle holder small 25 Dissecting and ligature forcep (mosquito forcep)
)
Optical System (0 and 30 degrees)
)
Electrocoagulation forceps
)
Suture material (4/0 PDS, 4/0 Prolene, 6/0 Prolene)
)
Scandicaine 0.5% with epinephrine (mepivacaine hydrochloride) 1 :200,000
)
Saline 0.9%
)
Xylometazoline hydrochloride solution
)
Compresses(10×10cm)
)
Nasal packing
)
Swabs
)
Brown steristrips
)
Leukosilk adhesive tape (w = 1.25 cm)
)
Plaster of Paris
)
Skin cleaning kit
)
10 ml Omnifix syringe with a long needle
18
1
https://t.me/med1917
3 Rhinoplasty
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Fig. 3.2
19