Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_850_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
37 Мб
Скачать
316 3 HEPATOBILIARY AND PANCREAS CANCER
https://t.me/medicina_free
Jabłońska, B. (2012). Biliary cysts: etiology, diagnosis and management.
World J Gastroenterol 18: 4801–4810.
Jackson, S.S., Van Dyke, A.L., Zhu, B. et al. (2019 August). Anthropometric
risk factors for cancers of the biliary tract in the biliary tract cancers pooling project. Cancer Res 79 (15): 3973–3982.
Jarnagin, W.R. and Winston, C. (2005). Hilar cholangiocarcinoma:
diagnosis and staging. Hpb 7 (4): 244–251.
Ji, B.T., Silverman, D.T., Stewart, P.A. et al. (2001). Occupational exposure to
pesticides and pancreatic cancer. Am J Ind Med [Internet]. 39 (1): 92–99. Available from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11148019.
Johnston, C.D. and Bullman, S. (2022). The tumour-associated microbiome.
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol [Internet]. 19 (6): 347–348. Available from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35361914.
Kalbi, D.P., Bapatla, A., Chaudhary, A.J. et al. (2021 July). Surveillance of
Gallbladder polyps: a literature review. Cureus 13 (7): e16113.
Kamisawa, T., Kuruma, S., Chiba, K. et al. (2017 February). Biliary
carcinogenesis in pancreaticobiliary malfunction. J Gastroenterol 52 (2): 158–163.
Kamisawa, T., Wood, L.D., Itoi, T., and Takaori, K. (2016 July). Pancreatic
cancer. Lancet 388 (10039): 73–85.
Kartal, E., Schmidt, T.S.B., Molina-Montes, E. et al. (2022). A faecal
microbiota signature with high specificity for pancreatic cancer. Gut [Internet] 20220308th ed. 71 (7): 1359–1372. Available from https:// www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35260444.
Kasprzak, A. and Adamek, A. (2019). Mucins: the old, the new and the
promising factors in hepatobiliary carcinogenesis. Int J Mol Sci 20 (6): 1288.
Khalaf, N., Yuan, C., Hamada, T. et al. (2018). Regular use of aspirin or
non-aspirin nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs is not associated with risk of incident pancreatic cancer in two large cohort studies. Gastroenterology [Internet] 20171208th ed. 154 (5): 1380–1390.e5. Available from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29229401.
Khan, S.A., Davidson, B.R., Goldin, R.D. et al. (2012 December). Guidelines
for the diagnosis and treatment of cholangiocarcinoma: an update. Gut 61 (12): 1657–1669.
Khan, S.A., Tavolari, S., and Brandi, G. (2019 May 24). Cholangiocarcinoma:
epidemiology and risk factors. Liver International 39 (S1): 19–31.
Kim, H.J., Kim, J.S., Joo, M.K. et al. (2015 December). Hepatolithiasis and
intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a review. World J Gastroenterol 21 (48): 13418–13431.
Kirstein, M.M. and Vogel, A. (2016). Epidemiology and risk factors of
Cholangiocarcinoma. Visc Med 32 (6): 395–400.
Klein, E.A., Richards, D., Cohn, A. et al. (2021). Clinical validation of a targeted
methylation-based multi-cancer early detection test using an independent validation set. Ann Oncol [Internet] 20210624th ed. 32 (9): 1167–1177. Available from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34176681.
Ko, A.H., Hwang, J., Venook, A.P. et al. (2005 July 5). Serum CA19-9 response
as a surrogate for clinical outcome in patients receiving fixed-dose rate gemcitabine for advanced pancreatic cancer. Br J Cancer 93 (2): 195–199.
Kohi, S., Macgregor-Das, A., Dbouk, M. et al. (2022). Alterations in the
duodenal fluid microbiome of patients with pancreatic cancer. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol [Internet] 20201105th ed. 20 (2): e196–227. Available from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33161160.
Komuta, M., Govaere, O., Vandecaveye, V. et al. (2012). Histological
diversity in cholangiocellular carcinoma reflects the different cholangiocyte phenotypes. Hepatology 55 (6): 1876–1888.
Koshiol, J., Gao, Y.T., Dean, M. et al. (2017 August). Association of Aflatoxin
and Gallbladder cancer. Gastroenterology 153 (2): 488–494.e1.
Koshiol, J., Wozniak, A., Cook, P. et al. (2016 November). Salmonella
enterica serovar Typhi and gallbladder cancer: a case-control study and meta-analysis. Cancer Med 5 (11): 3235–3310.
Kubo, S., Nagano, H., Tsujie, M. et al. (2022 August 19). Microsatellite
instability in patients with hepato-biliary-pancreatic malignancies in clinical practice (KHBO 1903). Int J Clin Oncol 27 (8): 1340–1347.
Kubo, S., Takemura, S., Tanaka, S. et al. (2016). Screening and surveillance
for occupational cholangiocarcinoma in workers exposed to organic solvents. Surg Today 46 (6): 705–712.
Kubo, S., Takemura, S., Tanaka, S. et al. (2018 March). Occupational
cholangiocarcinoma caused by exposure to 1,2-dichloropropane and/or dichloromethane. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2 (2): 99–105.
Kumagai, S., Kurumatani, N., Arimoto, A., and Ichihara, G. (2013 July).
Cholangiocarcinoma among offset colour proof-printing workers exposed to 1,2-dichloropropane and/or dichloromethane. Occup Environ Med 70 (7): 508–510.
Kusters, J.G., van Vliet, A.H.M., and Kuipers, E.J. (2006 July). Pathogenesis
of Helicobacter pylori infection. Clin Microbiol Rev 19 (3): 449–490.
Labib, P.L., Goodchild, G., and Pereira, S.P. (2019 February). Molecular
pathogenesis of cholangiocarcinoma. BMC Cancer 19 (1): 185.
Laird, B.J.A., Fallon, M., Hjermstad, M.J. et al. (2016 August 10). Quality of life
in patients with advanced cancer: differential association with performance status and systemic inflammatory response. Clin Oncol 34 (23): 2769–2775.
Lang, S.A., Bednarsch, J., Joechle, K. et al. (2021 May 4). Prognostic
biomarkers for cholangiocarcinoma (CCA): state of the art. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 15 (5): 497–510.
Lapitz, A., Arbelaiz, A., O’Rourke, C.J. et al. (2020 March). Patients with
cholangiocarcinoma present specific RNA profiles in serum and urine extracellular vesicles mirroring the tumor expression: novel liquid biopsy biomarkers for disease diagnosis. Cells 9 (3).
Lapitz, A., Arbelaiz, A., Olaizola, P. et al. (2018 October 12). Extracellular
vesicles in hepatobiliary malignancies. Front Immunol 9: 2270.
Ledbetter, M.L.S. and Hotchkiss, R.D. (1975 August 20). Chromosomal
Basis of the Merozygosity in a Partially Diploid Mutant of Pneumococcus. Genetics 80 (4): 667–678.
Leelawat, K., Narong, S., Wannaprasert, J., and Ratanashu-Ek, T. (2010).
Prospective study of MMP7 serum levels in the diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma. World J Gastroenterol: WJG 16 (37): 4697.
Levy, C., Lymp, J., Angulo, P. et al. (2005 September). The value of serum
CA 19-9 in predicting cholangiocarcinomas in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. Dig Dis Sci 50 (9): 1734–1740.
Li, L., Masica, D., Ishida, M. et al. (2014 September). Human bile contains
microRNA-laden extracellular vesicles that can be used for cholangiocarcinoma diagnosis. Hepatology 60 (3): 896–907.
Li, Y., Huang, Y., and Chen, J. (2019). Diagnostic value of serum biomarkers
for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 29 (10): 962–966.
Liang, Z., Liu, X., Zhang, Q. et al. (2016 October 1). Diagnostic value of
microRNAs as biomarkers for cholangiocarcinoma. Dig. Liver Dis 48 (10): 1227–1232.
Lin, H.Z., Zhang, T., Chen, M.Y., and Shen, J.L. (2021 February 22). Novel
biomarkers for the diagnosis and prognosis of gallbladder cancer. J Dig Dis 22 (2): 62–71.
Liu, F., Wang, J., Ma, W. et al. (2019). Clinical value of preoperative CA199
levels in evaluating resectability of gallbladder carcinoma. ANZ J Surg 89 (3): E76–80.
17 PANCREATIC AND BILIARY TRACT CANCERS 317
https://t.me/medicina_free
Lodi, C., Szabo, E., Holczbauer, A. et al. (2006). Claudin-4 differentiates
biliary tract cancers from hepatocellular carcinomas. Modern Pathol 19 (3): 460–469.
Loosen, S.H., Roderburg, C., Kauertz, K.L. et al. (2017 October). Elevated
levels of circulating osteopontin are associated with a poor survival after resection of cholangiocarcinoma. J Hepatol 67 (4): 749–757.
Lowenfels, A.B. and Maisonneuve, P. (2006 April). Epidemiology and risk
factors for pancreatic cancer. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 20 (2): 197–209.
Lu, J., Li, B., Li, F. et al. (2019). Prognostic significance of mucinous
component in hilar cholangiocarcinoma after curativeintent resection. J Surg Oncol 120 (8): 1341–1349.
Lu, M. and Zhan, X. (2018). The crucial role of multiomic approach in
cancer research and clinically relevant outcomes. EPMA J 9 (1): 77–102.
Lugo, A., Peveri, G., Bosetti, C. et al. (2018). Strong excess risk of pancreatic
cancer for low frequency and duration of cigarette smoking: a comprehensive review and meta-analysis. Eur J Cancer [Internet] 20181019th ed. 104: 117–126. Available from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih. gov/pubmed/30347287.
Luo, G., Jin, K., Deng, S. et al. (2021 April). Roles of CA19-9 in pancreatic
cancer: biomarker, predictor and promoter. Biochim Biophys Acta - Rev Cancer 1875 (2): 188409.
Macias, R.I.R., Banales, J.M., Sangro, B. et al. (2018 April). The search for
novel diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers in cholangiocarcinoma. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis 1864 (4Pt B): 1468–1477.
Macias, R.I.R., Kornek, M., Rodrigues, P.M. et al. (2019 May 20). Diagnostic
and prognostic biomarkers in cholangiocarcinoma. Liver Int 39 (S1): 108–122.
Mahdavifar, N., Mohammadian, M., and Salehiniya, H. (2018). Gallbladder
cancer in the world: epidemiology, incidence, mortality and risk factors. WCRJ 1032113/wcrj_20189_1124 5 (3): e1124.
Maisonneuve, P. and Lowenfels, A.B. (2015 February 1). Risk factors for
pancreatic cancer: a summary review of meta-analytical studies. Int J Epidemiol 44 (1): 186–198.
Maitra, A., Sharma, A., Brand, R.E. et al. (2018). A prospective study to
establish a new-onset diabetes Cohort: from the consortium for the study of chronic pancreatitis, diabetes, and pancreatic cancer. Pancreas [Internet] 47 (10): 1244–1248. Available from https://www.ncbi.nlm. nih.gov/pubmed/30325864.
Makiuchi, T., Sobue, T., Kitamura, T. et al. (2019 May 5). Smoking, alcohol
consumption, and risks for biliary tract cancer and intrahepatic bile duct cancer. J Epidemiol 29 (5): 180–186.
Makkar, R., Butt, J., Huang, W.Y. et al. (2020). Seropositivity for Helicobacter
pylori and hepatobiliary cancers in the PLCO study. Br J Cancer 123 (6): 909–911.
Marcano-Bonilla, L., Mohamed, E.A., Mounajjed, T., and Roberts, L.R.
(2016 October). Biliary tract cancers: epidemiology, molecular pathogenesis and genetic risk associations. Chin Clin Oncol 5 (5): 61–61.
Marchegiani, G., Andrianello, S., Malleo, G. et al. (2017 July). Does size
matter in pancreatic cancer? Ann Surg 266 (1): 142–148.
Masia, R. and Misdraji, J. (2018). Liver and bile duct infections. Diagn
Patho Infect Dis 272–322.
Matsuda, Y. (2019). Age-related morphological changes in the pancreas
and their association with pancreatic carcinogenesis. Pathol Int
[Internet] 20190724th ed. 69 (8): 450–462. Available from https://www. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31339204.
McFaul, C.D. (2006 February 1). Anticipation in familial pancreatic cancer.
Gut 55 (2): 252–258.
McGee, E.E., Jackson, S.S., Petrick, J.L. et al. (2019 December 1). Smoking,
alcohol, and biliary tract cancer risk: a pooling project of 26 prospective studies. JNCI: J Natl Cancer Inst 111 (12): 1263–1278.
Megibow, A.J., Baker, M.E., Morgan, D.E. et al. (2017 July). Management of
incidental pancreatic cysts: a white paper of the ACR incidental findings committee. J Am Coll Radiol 14 (7): 911–923.
Merz, V., Zecchetto, C., Santoro, R. et al. (2020 September 1). Plasma IL8 is
a biomarker for TAK1 activation and predicts resistance to nanoliposomal irinotecan in patients with gemcitabine-refractory pancreatic cancer. Clinical Cancer Research 26 (17): 4661–4669.
Midha, S., Chawla, S., and Garg, P.K. (2016 October). Modifiable and non-
modifiable risk factors for pancreatic cancer: a review. Cancer Lett 381 (1): 269–277.
Moeini, A., Haber, P.K., and Sia, D. (2021 April). Cell of origin in biliary
tract cancers and clinical implications. JHEP Rep 3 (2): 100226.
Molina-Montes, E., van Hoogstraten, L., Gomez-Rubio, P. et al. (2020).
Pancreatic cancer risk in relation to lifetime smoking patterns, tobacco type, and dose-response relationships. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev [Internet] 20200212th ed. 29 (5): 1009–1018. Available from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32051190.
Morimoto, M., Matsuo, T., and Mori, N. (2021 June). Management of
porcelain gallbladder, its risk factors, and complications: a review. Diagnostics (Basel) 11 (6).
Moss, E.L., Hollingworth, J., and Reynolds, T.M. (2005 March). The role of
CA125 in clinical practice. J Clin Pathol 58 (3): 308–312.
Muñoz-Martínez, S., Rimola, J., Londoño, M.C. et al. (2022).
Cholangiocarcinoma: early detection and screening in high-risk population. Hepatoma Res 8: 30.
Nagata, N., Nishijima, S., Kojima, Y. et al. (2022). Metagenomic
identification of microbial signatures predicting pancreatic cancer from a multinational study. Gastroenterology [Internet] 20220408th ed. 163 (1): 222–238. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ pubmed/35398347.
Oldfield, L., Evans, A., Rao, R.G. et al. (2022). Blood levels of adiponectin
and IL-1Ra distinguish type 3c from type 2 diabetes: implications for earlier pancreatic cancer detection in new-onset diabetes. EBioMedicine [Internet] 20220103rd ed. 75: 103802. Available from https://www.ncbi. nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34990893.
Olthof, S.C., Othman, A., Clasen, S. et al. (2016 Dec). Imaging of
Cholangiocarcinoma. Visc Med 32 (6): 402–410.
Ormanns, S., Haas, M., Baechmann, S. et al. (2016 December 1). Impact of
SPARC expression on outcome in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer not receiving nab-paclitaxel: a pooled analysis from prospective clinical and translational trials. Br J Cancer 115 (12): 1520–1529.
Osataphan, S., Mahankasuwan, T., and Saengboonmee, C. (2021 December
17). Obesity and cholangiocarcinoma: a review of epidemiological and molecular associations. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 28 (12): 1047–1059.
Owens, D.K., Davidson, K.W., Krist, A.H. et al. (2019 August 6). Screening
for pancreatic cancer. JAMA 322 (5): 438.
Pannala, R., Leirness, J.B., Bamlet, W.R. et al. (2008). Prevalence and
clinical profile of pancreatic cancer-associated diabetes mellitus.
318 3 HEPATOBILIARY AND PANCREAS CANCER
https://t.me/medicina_free
Gastroenterology [Internet] 20080118th ed. 134 (4): 981–987. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18395079.
Park, J.H., Han, K., Hong, J.Y. et al. (2022). Association between
alcohol consumption and pancreatic cancer risk differs by glycaemic status: a nationwide cohort study. Eur J Cancer [Internet] 20220119th ed. 163: 119–127. Available from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ pubmed/35065369.
Patel, A.H., Harnois, D.M., Klee, G.G. et al. (2000). The utility of CA 19-9
in the diagnoses of cholangiocarcinoma in patients without primary sclerosing cholangitis. Am J Gastroenterol 95 (1): 204–207.
Patel, T. (2011 April). Cholangiocarcinoma–controversies and challenges.
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 8 (4): 189–200.
Pereira, S.P., Oldfield, L., Ney, A. et al. (2020 July). Early detection of
pancreatic cancer. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 5 (7): 698–710. Available from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32135127.
Perkhofer, L., Gout, J., Roger, E. et al. (2021 March). DNA damage repair as
a target in pancreatic cancer: state-of-the-art and future perspectives. Gut 70 (3): 606–617.
Permert, J., Ihse, I., Jorfeldt, L. et al. (1993). Pancreatic cancer is associated
with impaired glucose metabolism. Eur J Surg [Internet] 159 (2): 101–
107. Available from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8098623.
Phyo Myint, E.E., Sereemaspun, A., Rocklöv, J., and Nithikathkul, C. (2020
June). Discovery of carcinogenic liver fluke metacercariae in second intermediate hosts and surveillance on fish-borne trematode metacercariae infections in Mekong region of Myanmar. Int J Environ Res Public Health 17 (11).
Pinter, M., Trauner, M., Peck-Radosavljevic, M., and Sieghart, W. (2016).
Cancer and liver cirrhosis: implications on prognosis and management. ESMO Open 1 (2): 1–16.
Porta, M., Gasull, M., Pumarega, J. et al. (2022). Plasma concentrations of
persistent organic pollutants and pancreatic cancer risk. Int J Epidemiol [Internet] 51 (2): 479–490. Available from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih. gov/pubmed/34259837.
Portincasa, P., van Erpecum, K.J., Di Ciaula, A., and Wang, D.Q.H. (2019
February 1). The physical presence of gallstone modulates ex vivo cholesterol crystallization pathways of human bile. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf) 7 (1): 32–41.
Postlewait, L.M., Ethun, C.G., McInnis, M.R. et al. (2017 January 1).
Association of preoperative risk factors with malignancy in pancreatic mucinous cystic neoplasms. JAMA Surg 152 (1): 19.
Proca, D.M., Niemann, T.H., Porcell, A.I., and DeYoung, B.R. (2000).
MOC31 immunoreactivity in primary and metastatic carcinoma of the liver: report of findings and review of other utilized markers. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol 8 (2): 120–125.
Prueksapanich, P., Piyachaturawat, P., Aumpansub, P. et al. (2018 May).
Liver fluke-associated biliary tract cancer. Gut Liver 12 (3): 236–245.
Puleo, F., Nicolle, R., Blum, Y. et al. (2018 December). Stratification of
pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas based on tumor and microenvironment features. Gastroenterology 155 (6): 1999–2013.e3.
Qin, D. (2019 February). Next-generation sequencing and its clinical
application. Cancer Biol Med 16 (1): 4–10.
Qureshi, T.A., Gaddam, S., Wachsman, A.M. et al. (2022). Predicting
pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma using artificial intelligence analysis of pre-diagnostic computed tomography images. Cancer Biomark 33(2): 211–217. doi: 10.3233/CBM-210273.
Rabiee, A. and Silveira, M.G. (2021). Primary sclerosing cholangitis. Transl
Gastroenterol Hepatol 6: 29.
Rahnemai-Azar, A.A., Weisbrod, A., Dillhoff, M. et al. (2017 June).
Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: molecular markers for diagnosis and prognosis. Surg Oncol 26 (2): 125–137.
Rajasegaran, Y., Azlan, A., Rosli, A.A. et al. (2021 October). Footprints of
microRNAs in cancer biology. Biomedicines 9 (10).
Rana, S., Dutta, U., Kochhar, R. et al. (2012). Evaluation of CA 242 as a
tumor marker in gallbladder cancer. J Gastrointest Cancer 43 (2): 267–271.
Rawla, P., Sunkara, T., and Gaduputi, V. (2019). Epidemiology of pancreatic
cancer: global trends, etiology and risk factors. World J Oncol 10 (1): 10–27.
Rawla, P., Sunkara, T., Thandra, K.C., and Barsouk, A. (2019 May).
Epidemiology of gallbladder cancer. Clin Exp Hepatol 5 (2): 93–102.
Rizvi, S., Eaton, J., Yang, J.D. et al. (2018 May). Emerging technologies for
the diagnosis of Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma. Semin Liver Dis 38 (2): 160–169.
Rodrigues, P.M., Perugorria, M.J., Santos-Laso, A. et al. (2018). Primary
biliary cholangitis: a tale of epigenetically-induced secretory failure? J Hepatol 69 (6): 1371–1383.
Rule, A.H., Goleski-Reilly, C., Sachar, D.B. et al. (1973 November).
Circulating carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA): relationship to clinical status of patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Gut 14 (11): 880–884.
Saffioti, F. and Mavroeidis, V.K. (2021 October). Review of incidence and
outcomes of treatment of cholangiocarcinoma in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. World J Gastrointest Oncol 13 (10): 1336–1366.
Sala, M., Ros, M., and Saltel, F. (2020). A complex and evolutive character:
two face aspects of ECM in tumor progression. Front Oncol 10: 1620.
Satiya, J., Mousa, O.Y., Gupta, K. et al. (2020 February). Diagnostic yield of
magnetic resonance imaging for cholangiocarcinoma in primary sclerosing cholangitis: a meta-analysis. Clin Exp Hepatol 6 (1): 35–41.
Schauer, D.P., Feigelson, H.S., Koebnick, C. et al. (2019). Bariatric surgery and
the risk of cancer in a large multisite Cohort. Ann Surg [Internet] 269 (1): 95–101. Available from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28938270.
Schmidt-Hansen, M., Berendse, S., and Hamilton, W. (2016 July). Symptoms
of pancreatic cancer in primary care. Pancreas 45 (6): 814–818.
Segura-López, F.K., Güitrón-Cantú, A., and Torres, J. (2015 February).
Association between Helicobacter spp. infections and hepatobiliary malignancies: a review. World J Gastroenterol 21 (5): 1414–1423.
Sharma, A., Kandlakunta, H., Nagpal, S.J.S. et al. (2018). Model to
determine risk of pancreatic cancer in patients with new-onset diabetes. Gastroenterology [Internet] 20180611th ed. 155 (3): 730–739.e3. Available from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29775599.
Sharma, A., Smyrk, T.C., Levy, M.J. et al. (2018). Fasting blood glucose levels
provide estimate of duration and progression of pancreatic cancer before diagnosis. Gastroenterology [Internet] 20180430th ed. 155 (2): 490–500. e2. Available from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29723506.
Sharma, J., Huda, F., Naithani, M. et al. (2022). Role of Gut Microbiome and
Enteric Bacteria in Gallbladder Cancer. Immunology of the GI Tract - Recent Advances. IntechOpen. doi: 10.5772/intechopen.104404.
Shen, N., Zhang, D., Yin, L. et al. (2019). Bile cell-free DNA as a novel and
powerful liquid biopsy for detecting somatic variants in biliary tract cancer. Oncol Rep 42 (2): 549–560.
Sheth, S.G., Conwell, D.L., Whitcomb, D.C. et al. (2017 May). Academic
pancreas centers of excellence: guidance from a multidisciplinary chronic pancreatitis working group at PancreasFest. Pancreatology 17 (3): 419–430.
Shieh, Y., Eklund, M., Sawaya, G.F. et al. (2016 September 13). Population-
based screening for cancer: hope and hype. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 13 (9): 550–565.
Signoretti, M., Bruno, M.J., Zerboni, G. et al. (2018 May). Results of
surveillance in individuals at highrisk of pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and metaanalysis. United Eur Gastroenterol J 6 (4): 489–499.
17 PANCREATIC AND BILIARY TRACT CANCERS 319
https://t.me/medicina_free
Silakit, R., Loilome, W., Yongvanit, P. et al. (2017). Urinary microRNA-192
and microRNA-21 as potential indicators for liver fluke-associated cholangiocarcinoma risk group. Parasitol Int 66 (4): 479–485.
Singhi, A.D., Koay, E.J., Chari, S.T., and Maitra, A. (2019). Early detection
of pancreatic cancer: opportunities and Challenges. Gastroenterology 156 (7): 2024–2040.
Siripongsakun, S., Vidhyarkorn, S., Charuswattanakul, S. et al. (2018
July). Ultrasound surveillance for cholangiocarcinoma in an endemic area: a prove of survival benefits. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 33 (7): 1383–1388.
Sithithaworn, P., Andrews, R.H., Nguyen, V.D. et al. (2012 March). The
current status of opisthorchiasis and clonorchiasis in the Mekong Basin. Parasitol Int 61 (1): 10–16.
Sombattheera, S., Proungvitaya, T., Limpaiboon, T. et al. (2015). Total serum
bile acid as a potential marker for the diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma without jaundice. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 16 (4): 1367–1370.
Song, J., Li, Y., Bowlus, C.L. et al. (2020 February 28). Cholangiocarcinoma
in patients with Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis (PSC): a comprehensive review. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol 58 (1): 134–149.
Srivastava, A. and Creek, D.J. (2019 May). Discovery and validation of
clinical biomarkers of cancer: a review combining metabolomics and proteomics. Proteomics 19 (10, SI).
Stapley, S., Peters, T.J., Neal, R.D. et al. (2012 June 22). The risk of pancreatic
cancer in symptomatic patients in primary care: a large case–control study using electronic records. Br J Cancer 106 (12): 1940–1944.
Stein, M., Ruggiero, P., Rappuoli, R., and Bagnoli, F. (2013 October).
Helicobacter pylori CagA: from pathogenic mechanisms to its use as an anti-cancer vaccine. Front Immunol 4: 328.
Stinton, L.M. and Shaffer, E.A. (2012 April). Epidemiology of gallbladder
disease: cholelithiasis and cancer. Gut Liver 6 (2): 172–187.
Subrungruanga, I., Thawornkunob, C., Chawalitchewinkoon-Petmitrc, P.
et al. (2013). Gene expression profiling of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 14 (1): 557–563.
Sun, C., Zhu, J., Wu, B. et al. (2018). Diagnostic and prognostic value of
microRNAs in cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta­analysis. Cancer Manag Res 10: 2125–2139.
Sung, H., Ferlay, J., Siegel, R.L. et al. (2021 May 4). Global cancer statistics
2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin 71 (3): 209–249.
Sung, J.J., Ho, J.M., Lam, A.S. et al. (2020). Use of metformin and aspirin is
associated with delayed cancer incidence. Cancer Epidemiol [Internet] 20200909th ed. 69: 101808. Available from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih. gov/pubmed/32919225.
Sungkasubun, P., Siripongsakun, S., Akkarachinorate, K. et al. (2016 June).
Ultrasound screening for cholangiocarcinoma could detect premalignant lesions and early-stage diseases with survival benefits: a population­based prospective study of 4,225 subjects in an endemic area. BMC Cancer 16: 346.
Takahashi, Y., Dungubat, E., Kusano, H. et al. (2021). Application of
immunohistochemistry in the pathological diagnosis of liver tumors. Int J Mol Sci 22 (11): 5780.
Tan, N., Ngu, N., Worland, T. et al. (2022 June 3). Epidemiology and
outcomes of primary sclerosing cholangitis: an Australian multicentre retrospective cohort study. Hepatol Int 16: 1094–1104. doi: 10.1007/ s12072-022-10356-1.
Tanaka, M., Fernández-del Castillo, C., Kamisawa, T. et al. (2017 September).
Revisions of international consensus Fukuoka guidelines for the management of IPMN of the pancreas. Pancreatology 17 (5): 738–753.
Tariq, N.U.A., McNamara, M.G., and Valle, J.W. (2019). Biliary tract
cancers: current knowledge, clinical candidates and future challenges. Cancer Manag Res 11: 2623–2642.
Tezuka, S., Ueno, M., Kobayashi, S. et al. (2018). Predictive value of ERCC1,
ERCC2, ERCC4, and glutathione S-Transferase Pi expression for the efficacy and safety of FOLFIRINOX in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer. Am J Cancer Res 8 (10): 2096–2105.
Thompson, D., Duedal, S., Kirner, J. et al. (2005 June 1). Cancer risks and
mortality in heterozygous ATM mutation carriers. JNCI: J Natl Cancer Inst 97 (11): 813–822.
Truty, M.J., Kendrick, M.L., Nagorney, D.M. et al. (2021 February). Factors
predicting response, perioperative outcomes, and survival following total neoadjuvant therapy for borderline/locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg 273 (2): 341–349.
Tsoi, K.K.F., Ho, J.M.W., Chan, F.C.H., and Sung, J.J.Y. (2019). Long-term use
of low-dose aspirin for cancer prevention: a 10-year population cohort study in Hong Kong. Int J Cancer [Internet] 20190107th ed. 145 (1): 267–
273. Available from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30575949.
Turati, F., Edefonti, V., Bosetti, C. et al. (2013 October). Family history of
cancer and the risk of cancer: a network of case–control studies. Ann Oncol 24 (10): 2651–2656.
Turati, F., Rossi, M., Mattioli, V. et al. (2022). Diabetes risk reduction diet and
the risk of pancreatic cancer. Eur J Nutr [Internet] 20210802nd ed. 61 (1): 309–316. Available from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34338866.
Valle, J.W., Kelley, R.K., Nervi, B. et al. (2021 January). Biliary tract cancer.
Lancet 397 (10272): 428–444.
Valle, J.W., Lamarca, A., Goyal, L. et al. (2017 September). New horizons for
precision medicine in biliary tract cancers. Cancer Discov 7 (9): 943–962.
van Dongen, J.C., van der Geest, L.G.M., de Meijer, V.E. et al. (2022 March
4). Age and prognosis in patients with pancreatic cancer: a population­based study. Acta Oncol (Madr) 61 (3): 286–293.
van Huijgevoort, N.C.M., Del Chiaro, M., Wolfgang, C.L. et al. (2019
November 16). Diagnosis and management of pancreatic cystic neoplasms: current evidence and guidelines. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 16 (11): 676–689.
Vege, S.S., Ziring, B., Jain, R. et al. (2015 April). American gastroenterological
association institute guideline on the diagnosis and management of asymptomatic neoplastic pancreatic cysts. Gastroenterology 148 (4): 819–822.
Vincent, A., Herman, J., Schulick, R. et al. (2011 August). Pancreatic cancer.
Lancet 378 (9791): 607–620.
Vithayathil, M. and Khan, S.A. (2022). Current epidemiology of
cholangiocarcinoma in Western countries. J hepatol 77 (6): 1690–1698. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2022.07.022.
Voigtländer, T., Gupta, S.K., Thum, S. et al. (2015 April 1). MicroRNAs in
serum and bile of patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis and/or cholangiocarcinoma. J Hepatol 62: S795–6.
Vujasinovic, M., Zaletel, J., Tepes, B. et al. (2013). Low prevalence of
exocrine pancreatic insufficiency in patients with diabetes mellitus. Pancreatology [Internet] 20130614th ed. 13 (4): 343–346. Available from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23890131.
Waddell, N., Pajic, M., Patch, A.M. et al. (2015 February 26). Whole
genomes redefine the mutational landscape of pancreatic cancer. Nature 518 (7540): 495–501.
Wang, L.J., He, C.C., Sui, X. et al. (2015 March). MiR-21 promotes
intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma proliferation and growth in vitro and in vivo by targeting PTPN14 and PTEN. Oncotarget 6 (8): 5932–5946.
320 3 HEPATOBILIARY AND PANCREAS CANCER
https://t.me/medicina_free
Wang, M., Wang, Y., Feng, X. et al. (2017). Contribution of hepatitis B virus
and hepatitis C virus to liver cancer in China north areas: experience of the Chinese national cancer center. Int J Infect Dis 65: 15–21.
Wang, S., Chen, Y., Xu, X. et al. (2017 November). Prevalence of hepatitis B
virus and hepatitis C virus infection in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Oncotarget 8 (60): 102437–102445.
Wang, Y., Lu, J., Wen, N. et al. (2022 December 30). The role of diet and
nutrition related indicators in biliary diseases: an umbrella review of systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutr Metab (Lond) 19 (1): 51.
Wang, Y.F., Feng, F.L., Zhao, X.H. et al. (2014). Combined detection tumor
markers for diagnosis and prognosis of gallbladder cancer. World J Gastroenterol: WJG 20 (14): 4085.
Wang, Y.T., Gou, Y.W., Jin, W.W. et al. (2016). Association between alcohol
intake and the risk of pancreatic cancer: a dose-response meta-analysis of cohort studies. BMC Cancer [Internet] 20160312th ed. 16: 212. Available from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26968702.
Wardell, C.P., Fujita, M., Yamada, T. et al. (2018). Genomic characterization
of biliary tract cancers identifies driver genes and predisposing mutations. J Hepatol 68 (5): 959–969.
Woodmansey, C., McGovern, A.P., McCullough, K.A. et al. (2017).
Incidence, demographics, and clinical characteristics of diabetes of the exocrine pancreas (Type 3c): a retrospective cohort study. Diabetes Care [Internet] 20170831st ed. 40 (11): 1486–1493. Available from https:// www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28860126.
Wörmann, B., Bokemeyer, C., Burmeister, T. et al. (2020).
Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase testing prior to treatment with 5-Fluorouracil, Capecitabine, and Tegafur: a consensus paper. Oncol Res Tre at 43 (11): 628–636.
Yang, F., Wan, Y., Xu, L. et al. (2021). MRI-Radiomics prediction for
cytokeratin 19-Positive hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter study. Front Oncol 3081.
Yang, J.D., Campion, M.B., Liu, M.C. et al. (2016). Circulating tumor cells
are associated with poor overall survival in patients with cholangiocarcinoma. Hepatology 63 (1): 148–158.
Ye, Y., Lui, V.C.H., and Tam, P.K.H. (2022). Pathogenesis of choledochal cyst:
insights from genomics and transcriptomics. Genes (Basel) 13 (6): 1030.
Yuan, C., Kim, J., Wang, Q.L. et al. (2022). The age-dependent association
of risk factors with pancreatic cancer. Ann Oncol [Internet] 20220406th ed. 33 (7): 693–701. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ pubmed/35398288.
Zerboni, G., Signoretti, M., Crippa, S. et al. (2019 January). Systematic
review and meta-analysis: prevalence of incidentally detected pancreatic cystic lesions in asymptomatic individuals. Pancreatology 19 (1): 2–9.
Zhao, H., Wu, L., Yan, G. et al. (2021). Inflammation and tumor progression:
signaling pathways and targeted intervention. Signal Transduct Target Ther 6 (1).
Zhou, J., Liu, Z., Yang, S., and Li, X. (2017 March). Identification of
microRNAs as biomarkers for cholangiocarcinoma detection: a diagnostic meta-analysis. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol 41 (2): 156–162.
18 The Multidisciplinary Management of
https://t.me/medicina_free
Primary Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Shakira Hoque1, Christy Kim1, Mihir Desai
5
Schumacher Suhrid Lodh Zekry
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Introduction
Hepatocellular cancer (HCC) remains one of the fastest growing causes of cancer-related deaths in the United States and is the leading cause of deaths overall in patients with cirrhosis (Ioannou et al. 2007). In 2020, HCC was the sixth commonest cancer diagnosis worldwide, with approximately 906,000 new cases (Sung et al. 2021). In men, liver cancer was the second most frequently occurring cancer death (Sung et al. 2021).
1,11
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, St. George Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia Department of Interventional Radiology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia Prince of Wales Clinical Campus, School of Clinical Medicine, University of New South Wales, New South Wales, Australia Department of Upper Gastrointestinal and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia Department of Radiation Oncology, Wollongong Hospital and University of New South Wales, New South Wales, Australia Department of Medical Oncology, St. George Hospital, Sydney, Australia School of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia Department of Surgery, St. George Hospital Sydney and University of New South Wales, New South Wales, Australia Department of Upper Gastrointestinal and Hepatobiliary Surgery, St. George Hospital, Sydney, Australia
Department of Interventional Radiology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, Australia Translational Medicine Group, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland Liver and Internal Medicine Unit, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
, Sri Jasti6, Mostafa Abasseri
10
, Natalie Collier5, Winston Liauw
2,3
, Pram Sirimana4, Malin Katarina
1,7
, Oliver M. Fisher8, Francis Chu9,
6,11
, Piotr Milkiewicz12 & Amany
defined using the Child-Pugh classification system (Table 3). Factors which affect prognosis include bilirubin level, presence of portal hypertension, presence of portal vein thrombus, presence of extrahepatic spread, presence of constitutional symptoms, and patient’s performance status (Llovet et al. 1999b). Most of these factors are accounted for in the BCLC staging system except performance status. The stage of HCC and patient’s functional status (Table 4) dictate the intent and type of treatment that should be offered.
Who Is at Risk of Developing Hepatocellular Carcinoma?
The vast majority of HCC arises in those with underlying chronic liver disease, including cirrhosis of any cause, chronic viral hepatitis B, and advanced non-alcoholic fatty liver disease with advanced fibrosis (Table 1) (Liu et al. 2019). This allows clear identification of the at-risk population in whom screening for HCC should be implemented.
How Do We Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma?
The most well-recognized staging system for HCC is the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging classification (Table 2) (Llovet et al. 1999a). The BCLC staging is preferred over the TNM staging system as it encompasses the severity of the underlying liver disease which strongly affects prognosis,
Gastrointestinal Oncology: A Critical Multidisciplinary Team Approach,
Second Edition. Edited by Janusz A. Z. Jankowski. © 2024 John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Published 2024 by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Locoregional Therapy
Case: A 75-year-old male has a history of alcoholic and NASH Child-Pugh A cirrhosis. He is independent with his mobility and activities of daily living. His HCC surveillance prompted a multi­phase CT that revealed a solitary enhancing 56mm nodule in Segment IV (Figure 1). However, he was found to have features of severe portal hypertension on imaging (Figure 2). His case was discussed at an MDT meeting and it was deemed his portal hypertension precluded surgical resection. Instead, he proceeded to TACE of which he had two sessions, with imaging confirming a favorable response. After re-discussion at the MDT meeting, the interventional radiologist had concerns of a possible cystic artery supply to the lesion, so it was decided that the patient would benefit further from MWA to ensure treatment completion.
What Is Transarterial Embolization?
Transarterial Embolization (TAE) or Transarterial Chemo­embolization (TACE) is a widely utilized therapy for the
321
322 3 HEPATOBILIARY AND PANCREAS CANCER
https://t.me/medicina_free
treatment of intermediate stage HCC who have well-pre­served liver function and a large or multinodular HCC without portal vein tumor thrombosis or extrahepatic metas­tasis, as outlined in the patient case seen earlier. A survival advantage compared to best supportive care has been clearly
Table 1 Causes of liver cirrhosis.
Causes of liver cirrhosis
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease Alcohol related liver disease Viral
Hepatitis B Hepatitis C
Autoimmune
Primary biliary cholangitis Primary sclerosing cholangitis Autoimmune hepatitis
Infiltrative/metabolic
Haemochromatosis Wilson’s disease Alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency Granulomatous liver disease Polycystic liver disease
Other
Medications
Hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia
demonstrated across a number of studies for patients receiving TACE in this cohort (Lencioni et al. 2016; Llovet et al. 2002; Llovet and Bruix 2003). Nearly half of all HCC patients world­wide receive TACE at some point in the course of their disease (Lencioni et al. 2014).
There is wide heterogeneity in technique with variations which include Conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization (cTACE), Bland Embolization and Drug Eluting Beads TACE (DEB-TACE).
cTACE is the most commonly performed variation. The rationale of cTACE is to occlude the blood supply to the hyper­vascular HCC with an emulsion of lipidol and a chemothera­peutic agent, most commonly doxorubicin or cisplatin. As HCC derives its vascular supply from the hepatic artery, as opposed to the non-tumor liver parenchyma, occlusion results in necrosis and slows tumor progression (Au and Frenette 2015; Piscaglia and Ogasawara 2018). The treatment can be performed with a lobar, segmental, or super selective approach. Common adverse effects include post embolization syndrome, liver enzyme abnormalities (18.1%), fever (17.2%), abdominal pain (11.0%), vomiting (6.0%), and nausea (1.7%) (Piscaglia and Ogasawara 2018).
Bland embolization is performed in a small number of highly experienced centers. Bland embolization is performed with particles to cause ischemia by cutting off the blood supply without a chemotherapeutic agent. Studies have indicated that there is no survival benefit of cTACE compared to bland embo-
Table 2
Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging system.
BCLC stage Description Child-Pugh Class Treatment
A (early stage) A1 Single tumor with normal bilirubin A Curative resection, percutaneous
A–B
present A3 Single tumor with raised bilirubin and portal hypertension A–B A4 Three tumors less than 3 cm in size A–B B (intermediate stage) Asymptomatic multinodular HCC A–B Palliative treatment C (advanced stage) Advanced symptomatic HCC with high risk features
(vascular invasion, extrahepatic spread) D (end-stage) End-stage widespread HCC C Best supportive care
Table 3 Child-Pugh classification system.
Clinical and lab criteria Points
1 2 3
Encephalopathy None Mild to moderate (grade 1 or 2) Severe (grade 3 or
Ascites None Mild to moderate Severe
Bilirubin (umol/L) < 34 34–50 > 50 Albumin (g/L) > 35 28–35 < 28 INR < 1.7 1.7–2.3 > 2.3
A–B Systemic palliative treatment
4)
treatment, or liver transplantationA2 Single tumor with normal bilirubin but portal hypertension
18 THE MULTIDISCIPLINARY MANAGEMENT OF PRIMARY HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA 323
https://t.me/medicina_free
Table 4 European Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status classification system.
ECOG Description
0 Fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction 1 Restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature 2 Ambulatory and capable of all self-care but unable to carry out any work activities. Up and about more than 50% of waking hours. 3 Capable of only limited self-care, confined to bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours. 4 Completely disabled. Cannot carry on self-care. Totally confined to bed or chair.
local and low systemic drug concentrations (Sieghart et al. 2015). In a subgroup analysis of patients with more advanced disease such as Child-Pugh B, ECOG 1, bilobar or recurrent disease DEB-TACE appears to outperform cTACE (Lammer et al. 2010).
What Is Transarterial Radioembolization?
Transarterial radioembolization (TARE) is a well-established locoregional therapy which has an expanding role in the treatment of HCC. It is a transarterial therapy which involves radioisotope-loaded particle embolization into the liver. The embolic particle does not occlude or alter the microvasculature of the hepatic artery due to its small size and thus is considered safe in portal vein thrombosis, unlike TACE. Its method of action is via local radiotherapy with increased significance given to its immunological effects (Chew et al. 2019). It is com­monly infused via the hepatic artery into either a lobar or more recently, in a segmental distribution.
Figure 1 Arterially enhancing 56mm nodule in segment 4 in a cirrhotic liver.
TARE requires a comprehensive preprocedural workup
Figure 2 Dilation of portal vein with resultant varices in right upper quadrant, seen in portal venous phase.
lization and this remains an area of ongoing research (Brown et al. 2016; Maluccio et al. 2008).
Drug eluting beads (DEB) were developed to enhance the delivery of the chemotherapeutic agent. DEBs are microspheres which are loaded with a standardized dose of chemotherapeutic agent (most commonly doxorubicin) that allows for a slow release of the drug. The aim of this mechanism is to ensure high
which includes assessment of the vascular anatomy and the hepato-pulmonary shunt. The workup involves a diagnostic angiogram to evaluate the vascular anatomy and embolize any extrahepatic branches which could lead to microsphere disper­sion to non-target organs. In addition, the hepato-pulmonary shunt is determined at this diagnostic angiogram through the injection of macro aggregates of albumin (MAA) labeled with
324 3 HEPATOBILIARY AND PANCREAS CANCER
https://t.me/medicina_free
Tc99. MAA-Tc99 behaves similarly to the radio-embolization microspheres and thus are used as a proxy to assess distribution to the lungs. A large shunt can lead to rare complications such as non-target pulmonary irradiation and radiation pneumo­nitis. A SPECT/CT is performed within an hour from the injec­tion to assess the hepato-pulmonary shunt (Ilhan et al. 2015). Contra-indications include a hepato-pulmonary shunt >20% of the injected dose or vascular abnormalities not correctable by embolization.
In addition, radiation lobectomy can be considered for increasing the future liver remnant with similar volumetric improvements to portal vein embolization with the added benefit of local tumor control (Vouche et al. 2013). Rather than the conventional strategy of lobar Y90 infusion, selective radio embolization of the tumor-bearing hepatic segment has been recently employed, termed “radiation segmentectomy.” This method allows significantly higher radiation doses to be safely delivered to individual segments without compromising the non-tumor bearing liver parenchyma. Exceeding this new threshold dose (>400 mGy) for an ablative effect results in complete pathological necrosis of the tumor with survival out­comes similar to curative approaches such as resection and radiofrequency ablation (Salem et al. 2021).
When Do We Use TARE Over TACE?
whereas MWA utilizes dielectric heating. Thermal ablation is often performed percutaneously under image guidance by inserting a probe into the tumor. Ablation may also be per­formed laparoscopically or via open surgery. Chemical ablation involves injecting ethanol into a tumor to cause cell death.
MWA and RFA are the most commonly performed and clin­ically verified ablation techniques with well demonstrated effi­cacy and a safety profile (Alonzo et al. 2015; Reig et al. 2022). Ethanol ablation should be considered where these are not fea­sible or safe (Reig et al. 2022). MWA is a newer modality with advantages over RFA including a larger zone of active heating and a more uniform necrosis within the tumor compared to RFA (Izzo et al. 2019). Additionally as MWA is not limited by tissue conductance, it is less susceptible to the “heat sink effect” compared to RFA (Izzo et al. 2019). The heat sink effect is a phenomenon where the effectiveness of hyperthermic tumor ablation is impaired when flowing blood in a large adjacent vessel causes a cooling effect (Goldberg et al. 1998). Whilst there is a trend to suggest MWA may be more efficacious, studies to date have not demonstrated a statistically significant difference in overall survival between the two modalities (Vietti Violi et al. 2018; Yu et al. 2017). MWA does however lead to decreased procedure times and better tumor inactivation for tumors 3–5 cm, adjacent to vessels and the gallbladder (Facciorusso et al. 2016; Vietti Violi et al. 2018; Yu et al. 2017).
Compared to TACE, TARE does not demonstrate a clear survival benefit for BCLC A/B patients; however there is improved time to progression and reduced toxicity (Salem et al.
2016). TARE is an effective bridging therapy to liver transplan­tation with evidence suggesting it is more effective than TACE (Ettorre et al. 2017; Lewandowski et al. 2009). In the newest guidelines, TARE should now be considered for single lesions ≤8 cm in BCLC 0/A patients if surgical resection and ablation is not technically feasible (Salem et al. 2021; Reig et al. 2022).
What Is Tumor Ablation?
Tumor ablation is a minimally invasive treatment that is com­monly performed for the treatment of HCC; the primary end­point is to obtain complete necrosis of tumors. Ablation is a keystone in the management of HCC with proven efficacy, especially for lesions <3 cm. It can be employed as a first line therapy, an alternative for surgery or in association with resec­tion in patients with a poor functional liver reserve (FLR) (Benson et al. 2021; Izzo et al. 2019).
Most commonly thermal and chemical ablation are used for HCC. Thermal ablation techniques include microwave ablation (MWA) and radiofrequency ablation. Thermal ablation induces cell death by delivering a destructive local temperature change to the tumor to induce coagulative necrosis (Young and Golzarian 2020). RFA employs thermo coagulation necrosis
What about Combination Therapy of TACE-ablation?
As shown in our patient case, the combination of TACE­Ablation is an effective tool for 3–5 cm HCC with proven superiority over monotherapy and for patients bridging to transplant. There is emerging evidence that for 3–5 cm HCC, it has comparable outcomes to surgery. TACE decreases the vas­cularity of the treated area and allows for a larger, more effica­cious, ablation zone to be created with high rates of histopathological necrosis (Vasnani et al. 2016; Young and Golzarian 2020). The TACE-Ablation combination has proven superiority compared to TACE or ablation alone in terms of overall survival and oncological outcomes (Ni et al. 2013; Peng et al. 2018). Additional benefits include that TACE prior to ablation will clearly delineate the tumor margins and reveal satellite lesions that may have been occult on preoperative imaging (Peng et al. 2018). There is emerging data suggesting it is comparable to surgery for overall survival and oncological outcomes (Kim et al. 2013; Lee et al. 2019; Peng et al. 2018). TACE-ablation is also an effective tool for bridging therapy to transplant (Vasnani et al. 2016).
For optimal oncological outcomes, a 1 cm margin is the stan­dard of care. Thus the TACE-ablation combination however is dependent on a favorably located lesion due to the large abla­tion zone. TARE is often employed in this patient population
18 THE MULTIDISCIPLINARY MANAGEMENT OF PRIMARY HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA 325
https://t.me/medicina_free
however there is limited comparative data though TACE­ablation has been more extensively studied (Young et al. 2020).
Surgery
Case: A 56-year-old man of East Asian background is diag­nosed with chronic hepatitis B after a full liver screen com­pleted for deranged liver function tests. He is referred to a hepatologist who commences him on an antiviral agent and enrolls him to a HCC screen with six-monthly liver ultrasound and serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels. He is found to have a raised AFP level and a solitary 2-centimeter solid liver lesion in segment VIII, which is then confirmed to be HCC on a mul­tiphase CT abdomen with characteristic arterial enhancement and venous washout (Figure 3). He is evaluated in a multidisci­plinary meeting and undergoes curative liver resection. He continues to follow up in the liver clinic with ongoing antiviral therapy, monitoring of liver function tests and six-monthly HCC screen.
How Do We Decide Who Is Eligible for Surgery?
Many patients with HCC have underlying liver dysfunction which makes the surgical management so challenging. The chance of curative resection must be cautiously balanced with the risk of precipitating hepatic failure. In early-stage disease meeting evidence-based criteria, liver transplantation offers the ability to not only gain local control but also treat the underlying liver disease. However, the hindrance of graft short­ages means that surgical resection remains the first-line treatment for early-stage disease in appropriate candidates and is safe and effective. Modern surgical approaches have achieved mortality rates of <3% with overall morbidity rates of <30%
(Witowski et al. 2019). Most deaths are due to post-operative liver failure. To avoid this, patient selection is paramount and should be done using a multidisciplinary approach. Selection involves exploring the patient, tumor and surgical factors that may impact on peri- and post-operative outcomes. In the fol­lowing section, we will explore these in turn.
The following parameters need to be taken into account in
the pre-operative assessment.
Patient Factors
General Health
Comorbid illnesses increase the risk of post-operative mor­bidity and mortality in patients undergoing liver surgery for HCC (Wei et al. 2003). Therefore, thorough pre-operative eval­uation of the general health of patients is a crucial aspect of assessing their candidacy for liver resection, particularly in the context of cirrhosis. This evaluation must incorporate assess­ments of all major organs, particularly cardiac, respiratory, and renal functions. Thus, pre-operative assessment and optimiza­tion of pre-existing comorbidities and risk factors are impor­tant to minimize complications and help select patients appropriately for surgery.
Malnutrition and Sarcopenia
Malnutrition and sarcopenia are common in patients with cir­rhosis as a result of protein catabolism (Perisetti et al. 2022). This can be compounded in patients with HCC. Patients with malnutrition and sarcopenia undergoing liver surgery for HCC are at a higher risk of post-operative complications, liver failure, and longer length of stay (Huang et al. 2019; Otsuji et al. 2015). Sarcopenia has also been associated with reduced total functional liver volume, as well as reduced five-year overall and recurrence-free survival (Dello et al. 2013). Nutritional therapy given prior to liver resection has been shown to reduce sepsis, need for treatment of ascites and overall post-operative mor­bidity and mortality rates (Fan et al. 1994). Identifying and quantifying malnutrition and sarcopenia in patients being con­sidered for liver resection is important to allow adequate pre­operative nutritional optimization, aided by specialist dietetic advice.
Figure 3 Arterially enhancing 2 cm nodule in segment 8 in a non­cirrhotic liver.
Age
There is a significant age-specific increase in the development of HCC in those aged over 75 (El-Serag and Rudolph 2007). Liver resection in this cohort has historically been less favor­able than locoregional therapies due to the perceived frailty that accompanies advanced age, as well as the increased number of comorbidities and likelihood of less physiological reserve to cope with complications (Cho et al. 2019). However, a number of retrospective studies have demonstrated similar three- or five-year overall and disease-free survival rates between elderly and younger patients undergoing liver resection for HCC