Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_827_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана
.pdf
374 S.A. Lagoo-Deenadayalan et al.
https://t.me/med1917
6. Robinson TN, Raeburn CD, Tran ZV, Angles EM, Brenner LA,
Moss M (2009) Postoperative delirium in the elderly. Risk factors
and outcomes. Ann Surg 249:173–178
7. Edelstein DM, Aharonoff GB, Karp A, Capla EL, Zuckerman JD,
Koval KJ (2004) Effect of postoperative delirium on outcome after
hip fracture. Clin Orthop Rel Res 422:195–200
8. McAvay GJ, Van Ness PH, Bogardus ST, Zhang Y, Leslie DL, LeoSummers LS, Inouye SK (2006) Older adults discharged from the
hospital with delirium: 1-year outcomes. J Am Geriatr Soc
54:1245–1250
9. Olin K, Eriksdotter-Jonhagen M, Jansson A, Herrington MK,
Kristiansson M, Permert J (2005) Postoperative delirium in elderly
patients after major abdominal surgery. Br J Surg 92:1559–1564
10. Marcantonio ER, Flacker JM, Michaels M, Resnick NM (2000)
Delirium is independently associated with poor functional recovery
after hip fracture. J Am Geriatr Soc 48:618–624
11. Inouye SK (2006) Delirium in older persons. N Engl J Med
354:1157–1165
12. Dasgupta M, Dumbrell AC (2006) Preoperative risk assessment for
delirium after noncardiac surgery: a systematic review. J Am Geriatr
Soc 54:1578–1589
13. Inouye SK, Bogardus ST, Charpentier PA, Leo-Summers L,
Acampora D, Holford TR, Cooney LM (1999) A multicomponent
intervention to prevent delirium in hospitalized older patients. N
Engl J Med 340:669–676
14. Vaurio LE, Sands LP, Wang Y, Mullen EA, Leung JM (2006)
Postoperative delirium: the importance of pain and pain management. Anesth Analg 102:1267–1273
15. Wei LA, Fearing MA, Sternberg EJ, Inouye SK (2008) The confusion assessment method: a systematic review of current usage. J Am
Geriatr Soc 56:823–830
16. Marcantonio ER, Flacker JM, Wright RJ, Resnick NM (2001)
Reducing delirium after hip fracture: a randomized trial. J Am
Geriatr Soc 49:516–522
17. Kalisvaart KJ, de Jonghe JFM, Bogaards MJ, Vreeswijk R, Egberts
TCG, Burger BJ, Eikelenboom P, van Gool WA (2005) Haloperidol
prophylaxis for elderly hip-surgery patients at risk for delirium: a
randomized placebo-controlled study. J Am Geriatr Soc
53:1658–1666
18. Liptzin B, Laki A, Garb JL, Fingeroth R, Krushell R (2005)
Donepezil in the prevention and treatment of post-surgical delirium.
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 13:100–1106
19. Sampson EL, Raven PR, Ndhlovu PN et al (2007) A randomized,
double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of donepezil hydrochloride
(Aricept) for reducing the incidence of postoperative delirium after
elective total hip replacement. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 22:343–349
20. Leung JM, Sands LP, Rico M et al (2006) Pilot clinical trial of gabapentin to decrease postoperative delirium in older patients.
Neurology 67:1251–1253
21. Tinetti ME (2003) Clinical practice: preventing falls in elderly persons. N Engl J Med 348:42–49
22. Sateia MJ (2003) Neuropsychological impairment and quality of
life in obstructive sleep apnea. Clin Chest Med 24:249–259
23. Kaushik S, Wang JJ, Mitchell P (2007) Rise and fall of skeletal
muscle size over the entire life span. J Am Geriatr Soc 55(7):1150
24. Tan KM, Austin B, Shaughnassy M et al (2005) Fall in an acute
hospital and their relationship to restraint use. Ir J Med Sci
174(3):28–31
25. Cawthon PM, Harrison SL, Barrett-Connor E et al (2006) Alcohol
intake and its relationship with bone mineral density, falls, and fracture risk in older men. J Am Geriatr Soc 54:1649–1657
26. Mathias S, Nayak US, Isaacs B (1986) Balance in elderly patients:
the “get-up and go” test. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 67:387–389
27. Kristensen MT, Foss NB, Kehlet H (2007) Timed “up & go” test as
a predictor of falls within 6 months after hip fracture surgery. Phys
Ther 87:24–30
28. Rockwood K, Rockwood MR, Andrew M, Mitnitski A (2008)
Reliability of the hierarchical assessment of balance and mobility in
frail older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 56:1213–1217
29. Amador LF, Loera JA (2007) Preventing postoperative falls in the
older adult. J Am Coll Surg 204:447–453
30. Gillis A, MacDonald B (2005) Deconditioning in the hospitalized
elderly. Can Nurse 101:16–20
31. Brown CJ, Friedkin RJ, Inouye SK (2004) Prevalence and outcomes
of low mobility in hospitalized older patients. J Am Geriatr Soc
52:1263–1270
32. Amemiya T, Oda K, Ando M et al (2007) Activities of daily living
and quality of life of elderly patients after elective surgery for gastric and colorectal cancers. Ann Surg 246:222–228
33. Morris PE, Goad A, Thompson C, Taylor K, Harry B, Passmore L,
Ross A, Anderson L, Baker S, Sanchez M, Penley L, Howard A,
Dixon L, Leach S, Small R, Hite RD, Haponik E (2008) Early
intensive care unit mobility therapy in the treatment of acute respiratory failure. Crit Care Med 36:2238–2243
34. Schweickert WD, Pohlman MC, Pohlman AS, Nigos C, Pawlik AJ,
Esbrook CL, Spears L, Miller M, Franczyk M, Deprizio D, Schmidt
GA, Bowman A, Barr R, McCallister KE, Hall JB, Kress JP (2009)
Early physical and occupational therapy in mechanically ventilated,
critically ill patients: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet
373(9678):1874–1882
35. John AD, Sieber FE (2004) Age associated issues: geriatrics.
Anesthesiol Clin North America 22:45–58
36. Sauvaget C, Yamada M, Fujiwara S et al (2002) Dementia as a predictor of functional disability. A four-year follow-up study.
Gerontology 48(4):226–233
37. Shlipak MG, Stehman-Breen C, Fried LF et al (2004) The presence
of frailty in elderly persons with chronic renal insufficiency. Am J
Kidney Dis 43(5):861–867
38. Ferrucci L, Guralnik JM, Studenski S (2004) Designing randomized, controlled trials aimed at preventing or delaying functional
decline and disability in frail, older persons: a consensus report.
J Am Geriatr Soc 52(4):625–634
39. Fried LF, Lee JS, Shlipak M et al (2006) Chronic kidney disease
and functional limitation in older people: health, aging and body
composition study. J Am Geriatr Soc 54:750–756
40. Beliveau MM, Multach M (2003) Perioperative care for the elderly
patient. Med Clin North Am 87:273–289
41. Cunha BA Urinary tract infections, males. eMedicine from WebMD.
http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/231574-overview. Accessed
12 September 2009
42. Rupp ME, Fitzgerald T, Marion N et al (2004) Effect of silvercoated urinary catheters: efficacy, cost-effectiveness, and antimicrobial resistance. Am J Infect Control 32:445–450
43. Schumm K, Lam TB (2008) Types of urethral catheters for management of short-term voiding problems in hospitalized adults.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev 16:CD004013
44. Hazelett SE, Tsai M, Gareri M et al (2006) The association between
indwelling urinary catheter use in the elderly and urinary tract
infection in acute care. BMC Geriatr 6:15
45. Foxman B (2002) Epidemiology of urinary tract infections: incidence, morbidity, and economic costs. Am J Med 113(Suppl
1A):5S–13S
46. Feldman C (2001) Pneumonia in the elderly. Med Clin North Am
85:1441–1459
47. Mehta RM, Niederman MS (2002) Nosocomial pneumonia. Curr
Opin Infect Dis 15:387–394
48. Niederman MS, Brito V (2007) Pneumonia in the older patient.
Clin Chest Med 28:751–771
49. Tablan OC, Anderson LJ, Besser R et al (2004) Guidelines for preventing health-care-associated pneumonia, 2003. MMWR Recomm
Rep 53:1–36

37529 Common Perioperative Complications in Older Patients
https://t.me/med1917
50. Neumayer L, Hosowana P, Itani K et al (2007) Multivariable predictors of postoperative surgical site infection in general and vascular
surgery: results from the patient safety in surgery study. J Am Coll
Surg 204:1178–1187
51. Kirby JP, Mazuski JE (2009) Prevention of surgical site infection.
Surg Clin North Am 89:365–389
52. Barie PS, Eachempati SR (2005) Surgical site infections. Surg Clin
North Am 85:1115–1135
53. Kaye KS, Anderson DJ, Sloane R et al (2009) The effect of surgical
site infection on older operative patients. J Am Geriatr Soc 57(1):
45–54
54. Dellinger EP, Hausmann SM, Bratzler DW et al (2005) Hospitals
collaborate to decrease surgical site infections. Am J Surg 190:9–15
55. Devereaux PJ, Yang H, Yusuf S, for the POISE Study Group et al
(2008) Effects of extended-release metoprolol succinate in patients
undergoing non-cardiac surgery (POISE trial): a randomized controlled trial. Lancet 371:1839–1847
56. McGory ML, Maggard MA, Ko CK (2005) A meta-analysis of perioperative beta blockade: what is the actual risk reduction? Surgery
138:171–179
57. Auerback AD, Goldman L (2002) Beta-blockers and reduction of
cardiac events in noncardiac surgery. JAMA 287(11):1435–1444
58. Lindenauer PK, Pekow P, Wang K et al (2005) Perioperative betablocker therapy and mortality after major noncardiac surgery. N
Engl J Med 353:349–361
59. Fleischmann KE, Goldman L, Young B et al (2003) Association
between cardiac and noncardiac complications in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery: outcomes and effects on length of stay. Am
J Med 115(7):515–520
60. Kulaylat MN, Dayton MT (2008) Surgical complications. In:
Townsend CM Jr, Beauchamp RD, Evers BM, Mattox KL (eds)
Sabiston textbook of surgery, 18th edn. Saunders Elsevier,
Philadelphia, PA, pp 338–347
61. Jin F, Chung F (2001) Minimizing perioperative adverse events in
the elderly. Br J Anaesth 87(4):608–624
62. Polanczyk CA, Marcantonio E, Goldman L et al (2001) Impact of
age on perioperative complications and length of stay in patients
undergoing noncardiac surgery. Ann Intern Med 134:637–643
63. Mehta RH, Rathore SS, Radford MJ et al (2001) Acute myocardial
infarction in the elderly: differences by age. J Am Coll Cardiol
38:736
64. Woon VC, Lim KH (2003) Acute myocardial infarction in the
elderly-differences compared with the young. Singapore Med J
44(8):414–418
65. Lindenauer PK, Fitzgerald J, Hoople N et al (2004) The potential
preventability of postoperative myocardial infarction. Arch Intern
Med 164:762–766
66. Ryder DL (2008) The use of beta-blockers to decrease adverse perioperative cardiac events. Dimens Crit Care Nurs 27(2):47–53
67. Badner NH, Knill RL, Brown JE et al (1998) Myocardial infarction
after noncardiac surgery. Anesthesiology 88(3):572–578
68. Martinez EA, Pronovost P (2002) Perioperative beta-blockers in
high-risk patients. J f Crit Care 17(2):105–113
69. Loran DB, Hyde BR, Zwischenberger JB (2005) Perioperative
management of special populations: the geriatric patient. Surg Clin
North Am 85:1259–1266
70. Amar D, Zhang H, Leung DHY et al (2002) Older age is the strongest predictor of postoperative atrial fibrillation. Anesthesiology
96:352–356
71. Ramsay JG (1999) Cardiac management in the ICU. Chest 115(5
Suppl):138S–144S
72. Amar D (2008) Prevention and management of perioperative
arrhythmias in the thoracic surgical population. Anesthesiol Clin
26(2):325–335
73. Goodman S, Weiss Y, Weissman C (2008) Update on cardiac
arrhythmias in the ICU. Curr Opin Crit Care 14(5):549–554
74. Fang MC, Chen J, Rich MW (2007) Atrial fibrillation in the elderly.
Am J Med 120:481–487
75. Douketis JD, Berger PB, Dunn AS et al (2008) The perioperative
management of antithrombotic therapy. Chest 133:299S–339S
76. Amar D, Zhang H, Roistacher N (2002) The incidence and outcome
of ventricular arrhythmias after noncardiac thoracic surgery. Anesth
Analg 95:537–543
77. Gage BF, Waterman AD, Shannon W et al (2001) Validation of
clinical classification schemes for predicting stroke: results from
the National Registry of Atrial Fibrillation. JAMA 285:2864–2870
78. Gilmore JC (2003) Heart failure and treatment: part II Perianesthesia
management. J Perianesth Nurs 18:242–246
79. Gutierrez C, Blanchard DB (2004) Diastolic heart failure: challenges of diagnosis and treatment. Am Fam Physician
69:2609–2616
80. Roche JJW, Wenn RT, Sahota O et al (2005) Effect of comorbidities
and postoperative complications on mortality after hip fracture in
elderly people: prospective observational cohort study. BMJ
331:1374–1378
81. Hernandez AF, Newby LK, O’Connor CM (2004) Preoperative
evaluation for major noncardiac surgery: focusing on heart failure.
Arch Intern Med 164(13):1729–1736
82. Ergina PL, Gold SL, Meakins JL (1993) Perioperative care of the
elderly patient. World J Surg 17:192–198
83. Brooks-Brunn JA (1997) Predictors of postoperative pulmonary
complications following abdominal surgery. Chest 111:564–571
84. McAlister FA, Bertsch K, Man J et al (2005) Incidence of and risk
factors for pulmonary complications after nonthoracic surgery. Am
J Respir Crit Care Med 171(5):514–517
85. Gabeau D, Rosenthal RA (2001) Preoperative evaluation of the
elderly surgical patient. In: Rosenthal RA, Zenilman ME, Katlic
MR (eds) Principles and practice of geriatric surgery, 1st edn.
Springer, New York, NY, pp 126–143
86. Kikawada M, Iwamoto T, Takasaki M (2005) Aspiration in the
elderly. Drugs Aging 22:115–130
87. Cook DJ, Rooke GA (2003) Priorities in perioperative geriatrics.
Anesth Analg 96:1823–1836
88. Marik PE, Kaplan D (2003) Aspiration pneumonia and dysphagia
in the elderly. Chest 124:328–336
89. Arozullah AM, Daley J, Henderson WG et al (2000) Multifactorial
risk index for predicting postoperative respiratory failure in men
after major noncardiac surgery. Ann Surg 232:242–253
90. Gore DC (2007) Preoperative maneuvers to avert postoperative
respiratory failure in elderly patients. Gerontology 53:438–444
91. Mendez-Tellez PA, Dorman T (2008) Postoperative respiratory failure. In: Cameron JL (ed) Current surgical therapy. Mosby, Baltimore,
MD, pp 1196–1201
92. El Sohl AA, Bhat A, Gunen H et al (2004) Extubation failure in the
elderly. Respir Med 98:661–668
93. Schneider GT, Christensen N, Doerr TD (2009) Early tracheotomy
in elderly patients results in less ventilator-associated pneumonia.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 140:250–255
94. Jaffer AK, Brotman DJ (2006) Prevention of venous thromboembolism in the geriatric patient. Clin Geriatr Med 22(1):93–111
95. Kim V, Spandorfer J (2001) Epidemiology of venous thromboembolic disease. Emerg Med Clin North Am 19(4):839–859
96. Piazza G, Seddighzadeh A, Goldhaber SZ (2008) Deep-vein thrombosis in the elderly. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost 14:393–398
97. Di Minno G, Tifano A (2004) Challenges in the prevention of
venous thromboembolism in the elderly. J Thromb Haemost 2:
1292–1298
98. Kumar A, Carson JL (2008) Perioperative anemia in the elderly.
Clin Geriatr Med 24:641–648
99. Conlon NP, Bale EP, Herbison GP et al (2008) Postoperative anemia and quality of life after primary hip arthroplasty in patients over
65 years old. Anesth Analg 106:1056–1061

376 S.A. Lagoo-Deenadayalan et al.
https://t.me/med1917
100. Foss NB, Kristensen MT, Kehlet H (2008) Anaemia impedes functional mobility after hip fracture surgery. Age Aging 37:173–178
101. Foss NB, Kristensen MT, Jensen PS et al (2009) The effects of
liberal versus restrictive transfusion thresholds on ambulation after
hip fracture surgery. Transfusion 49:227–234
102. Wu W, Rathore SS, Wang Y et al (2001) Blood transfusion in
elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med
345:1230–1236
103. Sarasin SM, Walton MJ, Singh HP, Clark DI (2006) Can a urinary
tract symptom score predict the development of postoperative urinary retention in patients undergoing lower limb arthroplasty
under spinal anaesthesia? A prospective study. Ann R Coll Surg
Engl 88:394–398
104. Keita H, Diouf E, Tubach F, Brouwer T, Dahmani S, Mantz J,
Desmonts J (2005) Predictive factors of early postoperative urinary retention in the postanesthesia care unit. Anesth Analg
101:592–596
105. Changchien CR, Yeh CY, Huang ST, Hsieh M, Chen J, Tang R
(2007) Postoperative urinary retention after primary colorectal
cancer resection via laparotomy: a prospective study of 2355 consecutive patients. Dis Colon Rectum 50:1688–1696
106. Frocht A, Fillit H (1984) Renal disease in the geriatric patient. J
Am Geriatr Soc 32:28–39
107. Go AS, Chertow GM, Fan D, McCulloch CE, Hsu CY (2004)
Chronic kidney disease and the risks of death, cardiovascular
events, and hospitalization. N Engl J Med 351:1296–1305
108. Kellerman PS (1994) Perioperative care of the renal patient. Arch
Intern Med 154:1674–1688
109. Kohli HS, Bhaskaran MC, Muthukumar T, Thennarasu K, Sud K,
Jha V, Gupta KL, Sakhuja V (2000) Treatment-related acute renal
failure in the elderly: a hospital-based prospective study. Nephrol
Dial Transplant 15:212–217
110. Harmankaya O, Kaptanogullari H, Obek A (2002) Acute renal
failure in the elderly: a five-year experience. Ren Fail
24:223–225
111. Sesso R, Roque A, Vicioso B, Stella S (2004) Prognosis of ARF in
hospitalized elderly patients. Am J Kidney Dis 44:410–419
112. Noorgate NVD, Mouton V, Lamot C, Nooten GV, Dhondt A,
Vanholder R, Afschrift M, Lameire N (2003) Outcome in a postcardiac surgery population with acute renal failure requiring dialysis: does age make a difference? Nephrol Dial Transplant
18:732–736
113. Azevedo V, Silveira M, Santos J, Braz J, Braz L, Modolo N (2008)
Postoperative renal function evaluation, through RIFLE criteria, of
elderly patients who underwent femur fracture surgery under spinal anesthesia. Ren Fail 30:485–490
114. Schmitt R, Coca S, Kanbay M, Tinetti ME, Cantley LG, Parikh CR
(2008) Recovery of kidney function after acute kidney injury in
the elderly: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Kidney
Dis 52:262–271
115. Cheung CM, Ponnusamy A, Anderton JG (2008) Management of
acute renal failure in the elderly patient: a clinician’s guide. Drugs
Aging 25:455–476
116. Bardacki H, Cheema FH, Topkara VK, Dang NC, Martens TP,
Mercando ML, Forster CS, Benson AA, George I, Russo MJ, Oz
MC, Esrig BC (2007) Discharge home rates are significantly lower
for octogenarians undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. Ann
Thorac Surg 83:483–489
117. Apfel CC, Laara E, Koivuranta M et al (1999) A simplified risk
score for predicting postoperative nausea and vomiting.
Anesthesiology 91:693–700
118. Pierre S, Benais H, Pouymayou J (2002) Apfel’s simplified score
may favourably predict the risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Can J Anaesth 49:237–242
119. Martin G, Glass PS, Breslin DS et al (2003) A study of anesthetic
drug utilization in different age groups. J Clin Anesth 15(3):194–200
120. Gan TJ, Meyer T, Apfel CC et al (2003) Consensus guidelines for
managing postoperative nausea and vomiting. Anesth Analg
97:62–71
121. Adanir T, Aksun M, Ozgϋrbϋz U, Altin F, Sencan A (2008) Does
preoperative hydration affect postoperative nausea and vomiting?
A randomized, controlled trial. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A
18(1):1–4
122. El Solh A, Okada M, Bhat A, Pietrantoni C (2003) Swallowing
disorders postorotracheal intubation in the elderly. Intensive Care
Med 29:1451–1455
123. Marik PE (2001) Aspiration pneumonitis and aspiration pneumonia. N Engl J Med 344:665–671
124. Barquist E, Brown M, Cohn S et al (2001) Postextubation fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing after prolonged endotracheal intubation: a randomized, prospective trial. Crit Care Med
29:1710–1713
125. Spechler SJ (1992) Epidemiology and natural history of gastrooesophageal reflux disease. Digestion 51(Suppl 1):24–29, Review
126. Hendry PO, Hausel J, Nygren J, Lassen K, Dejong CH, Lungqvist
O, Fearon KC (2009) Determinants of outcome after colorectal
resection within an enhanced recovery programme. Enhanced
Recovery After Surgery Study Group. Br J Surg 96:197–205
127. Raue W, Langelotz C, Neub H, Müller JM, Schwenk W (2000)
“Fast-track” rehabilitation to enhance recovery after ileostomy
closure – a prospective clinical trial. Zentralbl Chir 133(5):
486–490
128. Chen HH, Wexner SD, Iroatulam AJ et al (2000) Laparoscopic
colectomy compares favorably with colectomy by laparotomy for
reduction of postoperative ileus. Dis Colon Rectum 43(1):61–65
129. Schlachta CM, Burpee SE, Fernandez C et al (2007) Optimizing
recovery after laparoscopic colon surgery (ORAL-CS). Surg
Endosc 21:2212–2219
130. Kehlet H, Wilmore DW (2002) Multimodal strategies to improve
surgical outcome. Am J Surg 183:630–641
131. Taguchi A, Sharma N, Saleem RM, Sessler DI, Carpenter RL,
Seyedsadr M, Kurz A (2001) Selective postoperative inhibition of
gastrointestinal opioid receptors. N Engl J Med 345(13):935–940
132. Akca O, Doufas AG, Sessler DI (2002) Use of selective opiate
receptor inhibitors to prevent postoperative ileus. Minerva
Anestesiol 68(4):162–165

Chapter 30
https://t.me/med1917
Management and Outcomes of Intensive Care
in the Geriatric Surgical Patient
Gary T. Marshall and Scott R. Gunn
Introduction
Should we admit geriatric patients to the intensive care unit
(ICU) at all? Of course, we believe the answer to this question is a qualified “yes”; otherwise, our chapter would be
brief indeed. But, it is important to remember that rationing
health care based upon age has been advocated as a strategy
for limiting cost [1]. Refusal of ICU admission is common
across many developed countries and has been reported to
range between 24 and 46% of requested admissions [2–6]. In
these studies, advanced age and previously poor functional
status are the most common reasons for refusal to admit to
the ICU. In 2004, Sinuf and coworkers systematically
reviewed rationing of ICU resources and found that age and
severity of illness were most strongly associated with a
refusal to admit to the ICU [7]. Admission to the ICU carries
with it a large commitment of health care resources. If we
admit geriatric patients, how do we best allocate costly and
limited ICU resources? At a time when the numbers of geriatric ICU patients [8] and the costs associated with ICU care
are rapidly increasing, it becomes important to examine what
outcomes can be expected if we are to provide ICU care to
elderly patients.
Outcomes
Mortality
rates markedly lower than in a matched population (93%)
9]. Others have reported mortality rates in critically ill
[
patients ³85 years of 30% at ICU discharge, 43% at 30 days
posthospital discharge, and 64% at 1 year [10]. In addition,
age is an independent variable in many prognostic scoring
systems such as Acute Physiology and Chronic Health
Evaluation (APACHE) II [11], APACHE III [12], and the
Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) II [13].
But, chronologic age alone is not the whole story. In one
study, the impact of age on outcome weakened as the severity
of the acute illness (or physiologic derangement) increased
[14]. Margulies and coworkers found ICU mortality among
surgical patients related to severity of illness (evaluated as
SAPS) and did not differ significantly between nonagenarians
and younger patients when stratified for SAPS [15]. In two
reports of patients admitted to medical ICUs, old age no
longer predicted mortality when acute severity of illness,
diagnosis, and prior health were taken into account [16, 17].
As is clear from other chapters on physiologic changes associated with aging, the elderly are less able to maintain
homeostasis in the face of pathologic stressors than are
younger patients. It is to be expected, therefore, that they will
have more marked derangements for any given “insult” (e.g.,
injury, infection, or surgical procedure) than the young. In
other words, prognostic scoring systems which examine
abnormal physiology such as the APACHE III or SAPS II
should be expected to reflect increased mortality not only as
a result of increased age but also – and perhaps more
importantly – as a result of a decreased ability to maintain
homeostasis.
Mortality has traditionally been the primary outcome used to
assess health care delivery. Mortality among elderly patients
is substantial following hospital discharge. In a study of
medical and surgical patients ³70 years, 1-year survival was
56% in patients aged <85 years and 27% in those ³85 years –
G.T. Marshall (*)
Department of Trauma Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical
Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
e-mail: marshallgt@upmc.edu
R.A. Rosenthal et al. (eds.), Principles and Practice of Geriatric Surgery,
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4419-6999-6_30, © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011
Health-Related Quality of Life
While mortality remains an important metric for assessing
health care, other outcomes such as quality-adjusted life
years (QALYs), postdischarge placement status, and healthrelated quality of life (HR-QOL) are becoming increasingly
relevant. To date, the largest review of HR-QOL literature in
elderly patients after admission to the ICU was authored by
377

378 G.T. Marshall and S.R. Gunn
https://t.me/med1917
Hennessy and colleagues in 2005 [18]. After an extensive
MEDLINE review, they identified 16 studies that examined
HR-QOL or functional status in geriatric patients after ICU
admission. These studies included a total of 3,247 elderly
survivors of critical care whose HR-QOL or functional status
was assessed after ICU discharge. In their review, these
investigators were limited in their ability to synthesize results
across multiple studies results by study heterogeneity. For
example, the authors found that most studies used varying
assessments of severity of illness, chronic illness and prior
functional status. They found a lack of consensus regarding
definition of “elderly” and evaluation of outcomes using
various methods and at various times. In addition, many
studies suffer from a potential selection bias arising from
criteria or policies for ICU admission [19]. Studies usually
evaluate convenience samples of patients admitted to an
ICU; information about potentially eligible patients who
were not admitted is uncommon. Finally, most studies are
ICU-based or institution-based rather than population-based
and thus are limited by referral bias.
Despite limitations, these investigators found that the
majority of published literature in this field (10 of 16 reviewed
studies) supports the concept that aged ICU survivors maintain a good functional status and/or HR-QOL. There were
some exceptions. For example, Vasquez Mata and coworkers
found that their elderly cohort had the most reduction in
HR-QOL as compared to a younger cohort [20]. Of note,
Vasquez Mata used an assessment tool primarily focused on
physical functioning without a subjective assessment of
HR-QOL. While physical functioning plays a role in
HR-QOL, other significant domains include social functioning, pain, fatigue, and ability to perform activities of daily
living. It is possible that while physical function may decrease
for geriatric ICU survivors, other domains may become more
important in their overall assessment of HR-QOL. In another
significant study, Montuclard and coworkers found that independence in activities of daily living was significantly
decreased for elderly ICU survivors [21]. However, their
unique inception cohort (subjects with an ICU length of stay
>30 days) may limit this study’s generalizability.
In the largest, single-center outcome study of geriatric
patients who survive ICU admission (published after the
review by Hennessy), Kaarlola and coinvestigators evaluated
883 elderly ICU survivors and 1,827 controls [22]. They found
that cumulative 3-year mortality was higher among the aged
(57% vs. 40% in the control group). Most (66%) elderly nonsurvivors died within 1 month of ICU discharge (Fig. 30.1).
In addition, geriatric patients had significantly fewer
QALYs than age- and sex-matched controls. However, 97%
of the geriatric survivors lived at home. 88% described their
present state of health as good or satisfactory. In fact, 66%
found it similar or better than 12 months prior, and 48%
found it similar or better than before ICU admission.
Other Factors
The relation of age and severity of illness to mortality is
further modified by specific diagnosis. In one study, patients
admitted following trauma had the highest long-term survival compared to other diagnostic groups in a mixed ICU
[23]. Age, severity of illness, and diagnosis were independent predictors of 1-year survival in a recent study of medical
and surgical patients ³70 years of age [9]. In a study in which
many of the patients were admitted to the ICU following
surgery or trauma, the survival of those who were alive 6
months following hospital discharge approached that of an
age-, year-, and gender- matched general population [24].
The interaction of prior functional status and age may also
influence mortality. In one study, patients ³75 years of age
who had functional limitations were six times more likely to
die in hospital than those aged 50–64 years without limitations [25]. Among patients without functional limitation,
there was no difference in mortality between the youngest
and oldest groups. Physical activity status and quality of life
prior to admission were significant predictors of survival in a
mixed ICU population with large proportions of older and
chronically ill patients [26].
Conclusions
As age increases and functional status declines, patients may
become more willing to accept aggressive medical therapy.
For example, Sage and coauthors found that increasing age
was inversely related to patients’ assessments of quality of
life following discharge, but not to objective scores of physical and psychosocial disability [27]. These observations are
consistent with the concept that individual and societal views
of quality of life do not necessarily coincide in older patients,
who may be more accepting of health-related limitations in
life style than young patients [
is needed to accurately characterize the mortality and
HR-QOL of elderly survivors of critical illness, currently, we
believe that despite a higher mortality, aged patients with a
reasonable preadmission functional status and severity of illness can likely be expected to benefit from ICU admission. It
is probable that postdischarge functional status will be less
than that of younger ICU survivors; however, elderly ICU
survivors are likely to be satisfied with their postdischarge
HR-QOL and may even rate it higher than preadmission. In
the rest of this chapter, we examine common ICU-related
problems as they relate to geriatric patients: respiratory failure,
delirium, shock and hemodynamic monitoring, acute kidney
injury and renal replacement therapy, nutrition, and finally
care of the dying patient.
27, 28]. While more research

37930 Management and Outcomes of Intensive Care in the Geriatric Surgical Patient
40%
37%
29%
70%
13%
32%
17%
10%
Satisfied Ambivalent Unsatisfied
59%
Very Good Good
Fair Poor Don’t know
27%
31%
26%
30%
Self Evaluation of Health Status
Satisfied with Present State of Health
9%
1%
1%
10%
<65 Yrs
≥65 Yrs
<65 Yrs
≥65 Yrs
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
35%
30%
25%
20%
15%
10%
5%
0%
https://t.me/med1917
Fi g u r e 30.1 Health status and satisfaction among geriatric and younger
ICU survivors. Rockwood and coworkers interviewed 143 geriatric
(³65 years) and 225 younger (<65 years) ICU survivors. They found no
significant differences between the groups in self-evaluation of health
Respiratory Insufficiency and Failure
Changes in Pulmonary Function Associated
with Aging
The aging process affects every aspect of respiratory physiology and oxygen transport, with important consequences
for the geriatric patient with critical illness [29]. Pulmonary
complications and adverse pulmonary events are common in
elderly patient, following even elective surgical procedures
[30–33]. The age-related changes that are most clinically
relevant include declines in vital capacity, forced expiratory
volume in 1 s, alveolar–arterial oxygen gradient, arterial oxygen tension, and maximal oxygen consumption. Ventilatory
responses to hypoxia and hypercarbia are blunted [34, 35]
Also relevant for the aged surgical patient is decreased sensitivity of the airways to noxious stimuli. Diminished airway
sensitivity to stimuli such as refluxed gastric fluid in addition
to impaired mucociliary transport and decreased cough
strength renders the elderly patient at increased risk of silent
pulmonary aspiration [36].
status (top figure). However, they did find a statistically significant difference between groups (asterisk) in the number of respondents who
were satisfied with their present state of health (data from Rockwood
et al. [28]).
Outcomes
Outcomes of geriatric patients who require mechanical ventilation have been the focus of a number of conflicting
reports. A hospital mortality of 52% and 1-year mortality of
63% have been identified in data compiled from multiple
studies [19]. Age, severity of illness, comorbidity, and diagnosis are predictors of outcome in ventilated geriatric
patients, as they are in elderly critically ill patients in general
[19, 37]. In some studies, prolonged ventilation (defined as
15 days in one study and a total score of more than 100 for
the number of days of ventilation plus age in years in another)
has been accompanied by poor outcomes [37, 38], whereas
in others, the duration of mechanical ventilation has not been
significantly related to outcome [39, 40]. In a study of
patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS),
age >60 was associated with a fivefold increase in mortality,
presumably because of age-related impairments in cardiopulmonary regulatory mechanisms [29]. However other
investigators have not found a statistically significant increase
in mortality in elderly patients with ARDS [41]. In one of the
largest studies on this question, Esteban and coauthors

380 G.T. Marshall and S.R. Gunn
https://t.me/med1917
Fi g u r e 30.2 Comparison of the time of ventilatory support (days of
mechanical ventilation and days of weaning) and time of stay in the
intensive care unit and in the hospital between patients aged from 43 to
70 years (middle age group) and patients older than 70 years (elderly
recently reviewed the database from the International
Mechanical Ventilation Study [42] (n = 5,183) and found that
patients >70 of age had similar intensity of care as compared
to younger patients [43]. Their work supports conclusions of
others that age alone is not a sufficient reason to withhold
mechanical ventilation. They found that the most important
risk factors for death in the elderly patient requiring mechanical ventilation were coexistent acute renal failure, shock,
and limited functional status (Fig. 30.2).
Clinical Management
In our practice, we have found a number of techniques clinically useful on a daily basis. First, we avoid or minimize
narcotics when at all possible in the aged. We have found
regional techniques such as epidural analgesia or paravertebral blocks to be useful. Parenteral narcotics have been
associated with more frequent respiratory disturbances
following surgery, and regional techniques for pain management and nonnarcotic analgesics may therefore be
particularly valuable in the geriatric patient [30]. It is
also important to eliminate other medications, which might
contribute to delirium in the aged patient, for example,
group). The white boxes correspond to patients who survive and the
gray boxes to nonsurvivors. Box plot indicates the median and the inter-
quantile range. Bar indicates the minimum and the maximum number
of days (from Esteban et
al. [43]. Reprinted with permission).
anticholinergics. Nonsteroidal pain relief would seem useful
in this setting, but in practice, many elderly patients have
absolute or relative contraindications to their use [44].
Second, we mobilize elderly patients as soon as possible.
Assuming an upright position increases the functional
residual capacity and should lessen the closure of small airways that is caused by the supine position. Oxygen consumption following thoracotomy is lower in the sitting than
the supine position, suggesting that the work of breathing
may be lessened when upright [45].
In the elderly, at-risk patient who is not mechanically ventilated, measures such as incentive spirometry (IS) and other
lung recruitment maneuvers complement the basic measures
of pain management and mobilization. We use a staged
approach for managing pulmonary toileting in aged, compromised patients. First, we start with IS every 6 h. If patients
are unable to attain volumes of at least 8–10 ml/kg ideal body
weight on IS, then we add a noninvasive, lung expansion
therapy: a single-use device attached to an oxygen flowmeter
that provides positive airway pressure throughout the respiratory cycle. We continue to monitor IS volumes every 6 h
while maintaining lung recruitment. Finally, if volumes are
still below the desired 8–10 ml/kg, we initiate noninvasive
pressure support ventilation while continuing to follow IS
volumes when patients are off noninvasive ventilation.

38130 Management and Outcomes of Intensive Care in the Geriatric Surgical Patient
Host factors
Critical illness
related factors Iatrogenic factors
Age
Alcoholism
Apolipoprotein E4
Polymorphism
Cognitive
impairment
Depression
Hypertension
Smoking
Vision or hearing loss
Acidosis
Anemia
Fever/infection/sepsis
Hypotension
Metabolic disturbances
Fever/hypothermia
End organ dysfunction
Respiratory disease/
hypoxia
High severity of illness
Immobilization
Catheters
Medications
Sleep disturbance
Source: Girard and Ely [53]
https://t.me/med1917
While the techniques of mechanical ventilation and weaning
may not differ in the elderly, they may require a longer period
of support, given the impairments imposed by age, comorbidity, and acute illness. Caution should be exercised when
liberating elderly patients from mechanical ventilation.
Parameters used to predict successful weaning from mechanical ventilation in young patients appear less reliable in the
elderly [46]. Even after successfully undergoing a trial of
spontaneous breathing prior to extubation, elderly patients
may not do as well as younger patients. The ARDSnet investigators examined age as a factor affecting outcome from
acute lung injury and ARDS [47]. They found that although
patients >70 years of age were able to breathe spontaneously
for 2 h without ventilator assistance – a commonly accepted
weaning parameter – at a similar time point to younger
patients, the older patients had inferior outcomes, such as
higher reintubation rates, longer ICU and hospital stays, and
lower survival rates at 28 days.
Delirium
Definition, Assessment, and Incidence
Delirium is an acute state of confusion that develops over a
short period of time and fluctuates over time. It is often the
result of underlying organic derangements, such as infection,
medical illness, and drug use or withdrawal. Delirium can be
distinguished from dementia by its acute onset and fluctuating
course. The assessment of acute changes in cognition is difficult in the ICU setting due to the severity of underlying
disease and the frequent loss of verbal communication due to
mechanical ventilation. One tool for assessment of delirium
in the ICU, which was adapted from the Confusion
Assessment Method (CAM), is the CAM-ICU [48]. It has
been validated in several studies as being both highly sensitive and specific [48, 49]. Using CAM-ICU, delirium is diag-
nosed in two steps. First, a standardized sedation scale, such
as the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale [50] is used to
determine the level of consciousness. Any patient not determined to be comatose is then assessed for four features of
delirium: (1) Acute onset of mental status changes or a fluctuating course, (2) inattention, (3) disorganized thinking, and
(4) an altered level of consciousness. A diagnosis of delirium
is made with the presence of both features (1) and (2) in
addition to either feature (3) or (4) [48]. In a recent study of
elderly patients admitted to the ICU, the rates of delirium
were found to be >70% during their hospitalization. In the
same study, the effect of dementia was also assessed. Patients
with dementia had a 40% higher overall rate of delirium during
hospitalization than those without dementia [51]. There is
little doubt that as the elderly population ages, the prevalence
and burden of delirium in the ICU will grow.
Predisposing Factors
Predisposing Factors for Delirium in the ICU
The risk factors for delirium are divided into host factors,
which are present on admission to the ICU, and precipitating
factors, which occur during the course of illness. It is this
second group of factors that are potentially modifiable and
therefore the target of therapeutic or prophylactic intervention [52, 53] (Table 30.1).
The use of sedative and analgesic medications deserves
special attention. Nearly all patients in the ICU receive these
medications. However, their use is not without detrimental
effects. These effects include prolonged mechanical ventilation and an increased utilization of diagnostic studies for
altered mental status when sedatives are used in a continuous,
rather than intermittent, fashion. Daily interruption of sedation is one method used to avoid this complication [54].
Benzodiazepines and anticholinergics have been consistently
linked to delirium in the elderly [55]. Pisani and coworkers
recently published data showing that use of a benzodiazepine
or opioid was associated with increased delirium duration,
especially the first episode (relative risk of 1.64 with a 95%
confidence interval of 1.27–2.10) [56]. Trials of newer agents
have shown some promise. In a 2007 trial by Pandharipande
et al., the use of dexmedetomidine (an alpha 2 agonist) was
compared to lorazepam in mechanically ventilated patients.
The use of dexmedetomidine was associated with more
delirium-free days than lorazepam [57]. The data regarding
the use of opioids is less clear. A study by Ouimet and
coworkers demonstrated higher daily use of opioids in ICU
patients without delirium [58]. Similarly, in a study of hipfracture patients, Morrison and coauthors found that patients
treated liberally with opioid analgesics were less likely to
Ta b l e 30.1 Predisposing factors for delirium in the ICU

382 G.T. Marshall and S.R. Gunn
https://t.me/med1917
develop delirium than those who received less analgesia [59].
Meperidine is the exception, as it is consistently linked to the
development of delirium, especially in the aged [60–62].
These findings point to the need for careful use of these
agents with attention to providing adequate pain relief while
avoiding oversedation.
Evaluation, Prevention, and Treatment
Once delirium is diagnosed, an underlying organic source
must first be sought. A diminished level of consciousness
may herald underlying infection or metabolic derangements, and these must be ruled out by careful history and
physical examination. Within the ICU, risk factors more
prevalent in the setting of critical illness must be addressed.
These include infection, metabolic and electrolyte abnormalities, and medication exposure. If critical illness related
factors are ruled out, other interventions may prove useful
in reducing delirium such as repeated reorientation of the
patient and activities designed to be cognitively stimulating;
a nonpharmacologic sleep protocol; early mobilization and
range of motion exercise; prompt removal of restraints and
catheters; use of eyeglasses and hearing aids; and the early
correction of dehydration [63]. These results were con-
firmed in patients after hip fracture [64] and in hospital-
ized geriatric patients [65] but have not yet been studied in
the ICU.
After the use of nonpharmacologic strategies to minimize risk factors and addressing the metabolic derangements associated with critical care illness, consideration
should be given to the use of pharmacologic agents to
manage the symptoms of delirium. Currently, the clinical
practice guideline from the Society of Critical Care
Medicine recommends haloperidol as the drug of choice
for treatment of delirium in the ICU [66]. This is also true
for the geriatric patient [67]. Using intermittent intravenous
injection, a 2-mg dose is recommended. Repeated doses are
administered if symptoms are not controlled, doubling the
previously administered dose every 15–20 min until agitation resolves. Once controlled, scheduled doses are given
every 4–6 h and then tapered over several days. Side effects
of haloperidol include QT interval prolongation, extrapyramidal symptoms, and neuroleptic malignant syndrome.
Routine EKG monitoring is suggested to detect any QT
prolongation [66]. Atypical antipsychotics, such as risperidone, ziprasidone, quetiapine, and olanzapine, may also
have a role in the management of delirium. Although no
placebo-controlled studies of these agents exist, early data
suggests that these agents may be at least as effective as
haloperidol and may have fewer side effects [68].
Outcomes
Among ICU patients, numerous adverse events have been
associated with delirium. These include unplanned extubation, removal of catheters and drains, failed extubation,
prolonged hospital stay, increased health care costs, and
increased mortality. Milbrandt and colleagues studied patient
charges in 275 consecutive, mechanically ventilated ICU
patients and found the presence of delirium to be associated
with 39% increased ICU cost (95% CI, 12–72%) and 31%
higher hospital cost (95% CI, 1–70%) [69]. In addition to the
acute adverse events associated with delirium in critically
ill patients, multiple long-term detrimental effects have
been noted. Ely and coworkers reported that delirium was
associated with a threefold increase in the risk of death at 6
months [70]. Jackson and coauthors reviewed nine prospective studies a diverse group of hospitalized and critically ill
patients and reported that delirium during hospitalization
was associated with a cognitive decline over the following
1–3 years [71].
Shock and Hemodynamic Monitoring
Changes in the Cardiovascular System
Associated with Aging
During the course of aging, there are structural and functional changes within the heart and vasculature which become
important in the critical care of the geriatric patient. For
example, there is a significant decrease in the compliance
and distensibility of the aorta and vascular tree. This stiffening
of the arteries results in an increase in afterload. The results
of the increased afterload include left ventricular hypertrophy and decrease in diastolic compliance. Wall thickness
increases of up to 30% have been documented. Diastolic
compliance is also reduced, and when coupled with delayed
diastolic filling observed in the elderly heart, results in nearly
a 50% reduction in early diastolic ventricular filling. Ventricular
filling becomes much more dependent on atrial contraction.
Diastolic dysfunction and decreased left ventricular compliance means that the aging heart must achieve higher-end
diastolic pressures to preserve preload and thus stroke
volume. The clinical implications of these changes are that
cardiac output is much more reliant on adequate preload and
atrial systole. Hypovolemia must be avoided, and atrial
arrhythmias must be controlled or addressed in the face of
surgical stress and sepsis. In addition to normal age-related
changes, clinicians must also take into account the effects of
ischemic heart disease, which becomes increasingly prevalent

38330 Management and Outcomes of Intensive Care in the Geriatric Surgical Patient
https://t.me/med1917
with age. The Framingham Heart Study found that myocardial
infarction was silent or unrecognized in over 40% of patients
aged 75–84 years compared to under 20% in the group
between age 45 and 54 years [72].
Monitoring and Management of Shock
Shock is best defined as a state of inadequate tissue perfusion. In the uncompensated state, it is easily recognized
by tachycardia, oliguria, and hypotension. However, most
critical care practitioners would prefer to recognize hypoperfusion before overt decompensation. The initial monitoring
of the critically ill patient should include close attention to
the physical exam, arterial blood pressure monitoring, and the
urine output. We have found these parameters – and more
importantly, their change over time – most useful in determining the response to resuscitative efforts, but they can fail
to detect ongoing tissue hypoperfusion and hypoxia [73].
Even after hypotension has been corrected and urine output
restored, a state of “compensated shock” may remain. In this
condition, tissue hypoxia is ongoing, leading to multiple
organ dysfunction and death. Hypoxia forces tissues to utilize anaerobic pathways, resulting in lactic acid production.
Large amounts of H+ may then be produced. Base deficit,
lactate level, and bicarbonate levels are frequently used to
assess both the initial state of shock and to monitor the effects
of ongoing resuscitation. Although no single end point is
applicable to every scenario, it is important to repeatedly
reexamine potentially “shocky” patients and follow them closely
to determine the success or inadequacy of resuscitation.
The use of pulmonary artery catheters (PACs) is no longer
de rigueur. There is currently no prospective evidence supporting their use. Friese and coworkers analyzed the National
Trauma Data Bank and found higher mortality in trauma
patients managed with a PAC. They did, however, find that
those with severe injury who arrived in shock and older
patients had a survival benefit when a PAC was used to guide
management [74]. However, most evidence would contradict
this. In a large meta-analysis, Shah and coworkers evaluated
13 randomized clinical trials. They concluded that in critically ill patients, the use of PACs neither increased mortality
or hospital days nor did it confer benefit. The absence of
benefit may have been the result of the lack of any clear or
specific guidelines for treatment based on the data collected
[75]. The PAC catheter was often used to drive “supranormal
resuscitation,” which sought to maximize cardiac index
(>4.5 l/min/m2) and oxygen delivery index (>600 ml/min/
m2). Achieving these goals was associated with an increase
in survival; however, there was no prospective evidence to
suggest a benefit to attempting to attain these goals. Rather,
the ability to achieve these goals appears to be a marker of
the patient’s physiologic reserve [76].
Mixed central venous oxygen saturation (SCVO2) may be a
useful adjunct in determining the adequacy of oxygen delivery.
A value of >70% is considered to be normal. Lower values
are consistent with flow-dependent delivery of oxygen, and a
variety of strategies have been published using SCVO2 as an
end point for resuscitation. The most promising strategy was
published by Rivers and coworkers in a group of patients
with septic shock presenting to the emergency department.
An early goal-directed resuscitation strategy aimed at achieving an SCVO2 of ³70% resulted in a significant decrease in
mortality (46.5% in the control group vs. 30.5% in the treatment group) [77]. Of interest, the mean age in the treatment
group was 67.1 years (±17.4 SD).
Resuscitation with crystalloid, blood and the administration of vasopressors are all methods to improve tissue oxygen
delivery [58]. Guidelines for the optimal use of these techniques are varied, and each approach is not without complications. Early restoration of circulating blood volume with
blood products and crystalloid is crucial, especially in the
elderly who are more dependent on effective ventricular filling
to maximize cardiac output. In the early phase of resuscitation, fluids are probably superior to vasopressors for the
maintenance of blood pressure [78]. Care, however, must be
taken to avoid excessive amounts of crystalloid as this has
been linked to cardiac and pulmonary complications, coagulopathy, and acid–base disturbances [79]. Transfusion of
blood to restore adequate oxygen carrying capacity is vital in
cases of frank anemia, but exact triggers for transfusion in
the elderly are still debated. The Hebert study suggests a
transfusion threshold value of <7 g/dl of hemoglobin, and
this recommendation has been widely adopted. This study,
however, excluded patients with chronic anemia, ischemic
heart disease, or any patient in whom the attending physician
was unwilling to tolerate a transfusion trigger of <7 g/dl [80].
In elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction, a lower
30-day mortality was associated with blood transfusion for
hematocrit values <30% [81]. A hematocrit of <30% during
operation is predictive of postoperative delirium [82]. Other
studies have documented increased myocardial ischemia
when intraoperative or postoperative hematocrit fell below
28% [83, 84]. Given the high incidence of ischemic cardiac
disease – often silent in the elderly – care should be taken in
setting a “one-size-fits-all” transfusion trigger in the geriatric
population.
Once effective volume has been restored, inotropes may
be required to augment oxygen delivery. The effects of aging
can influence the choice of agents. In elderly patients, the
response to b-agonists declines, with subsequent reduction
in the inotropic, chronotropic, and vasodilatory effects of
these medications. With these changes, nonadrenergic effects
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
