Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_827_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
39 Мб
Скачать
374 S.A. Lagoo-Deenadayalan et al.
https://t.me/med1917
6. Robinson TN, Raeburn CD, Tran ZV, Angles EM, Brenner LA, Moss M (2009) Postoperative delirium in the elderly. Risk factors and outcomes. Ann Surg 249:173–178
7. Edelstein DM, Aharonoff GB, Karp A, Capla EL, Zuckerman JD, Koval KJ (2004) Effect of postoperative delirium on outcome after hip fracture. Clin Orthop Rel Res 422:195–200
8. McAvay GJ, Van Ness PH, Bogardus ST, Zhang Y, Leslie DL, Leo­Summers LS, Inouye SK (2006) Older adults discharged from the hospital with delirium: 1-year outcomes. J Am Geriatr Soc 54:1245–1250
9. Olin K, Eriksdotter-Jonhagen M, Jansson A, Herrington MK, Kristiansson M, Permert J (2005) Postoperative delirium in elderly patients after major abdominal surgery. Br J Surg 92:1559–1564
10. Marcantonio ER, Flacker JM, Michaels M, Resnick NM (2000) Delirium is independently associated with poor functional recovery after hip fracture. J Am Geriatr Soc 48:618–624
11. Inouye SK (2006) Delirium in older persons. N Engl J Med 354:1157–1165
12. Dasgupta M, Dumbrell AC (2006) Preoperative risk assessment for delirium after noncardiac surgery: a systematic review. J Am Geriatr Soc 54:1578–1589
13. Inouye SK, Bogardus ST, Charpentier PA, Leo-Summers L, Acampora D, Holford TR, Cooney LM (1999) A multicomponent intervention to prevent delirium in hospitalized older patients. N Engl J Med 340:669–676
14. Vaurio LE, Sands LP, Wang Y, Mullen EA, Leung JM (2006) Postoperative delirium: the importance of pain and pain manage­ment. Anesth Analg 102:1267–1273
15. Wei LA, Fearing MA, Sternberg EJ, Inouye SK (2008) The confu­sion assessment method: a systematic review of current usage. J Am Geriatr Soc 56:823–830
16. Marcantonio ER, Flacker JM, Wright RJ, Resnick NM (2001) Reducing delirium after hip fracture: a randomized trial. J Am Geriatr Soc 49:516–522
17. Kalisvaart KJ, de Jonghe JFM, Bogaards MJ, Vreeswijk R, Egberts TCG, Burger BJ, Eikelenboom P, van Gool WA (2005) Haloperidol prophylaxis for elderly hip-surgery patients at risk for delirium: a randomized placebo-controlled study. J Am Geriatr Soc 53:1658–1666
18. Liptzin B, Laki A, Garb JL, Fingeroth R, Krushell R (2005) Donepezil in the prevention and treatment of post-surgical delirium. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 13:100–1106
19. Sampson EL, Raven PR, Ndhlovu PN et al (2007) A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of donepezil hydrochloride (Aricept) for reducing the incidence of postoperative delirium after elective total hip replacement. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 22:343–349
20. Leung JM, Sands LP, Rico M et al (2006) Pilot clinical trial of gaba­pentin to decrease postoperative delirium in older patients. Neurology 67:1251–1253
21. Tinetti ME (2003) Clinical practice: preventing falls in elderly per­sons. N Engl J Med 348:42–49
22. Sateia MJ (2003) Neuropsychological impairment and quality of life in obstructive sleep apnea. Clin Chest Med 24:249–259
23. Kaushik S, Wang JJ, Mitchell P (2007) Rise and fall of skeletal muscle size over the entire life span. J Am Geriatr Soc 55(7):1150
24. Tan KM, Austin B, Shaughnassy M et al (2005) Fall in an acute hospital and their relationship to restraint use. Ir J Med Sci 174(3):28–31
25. Cawthon PM, Harrison SL, Barrett-Connor E et al (2006) Alcohol intake and its relationship with bone mineral density, falls, and frac­ture risk in older men. J Am Geriatr Soc 54:1649–1657
26. Mathias S, Nayak US, Isaacs B (1986) Balance in elderly patients: the “get-up and go” test. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 67:387–389
27. Kristensen MT, Foss NB, Kehlet H (2007) Timed “up & go” test as a predictor of falls within 6 months after hip fracture surgery. Phys Ther 87:24–30
28. Rockwood K, Rockwood MR, Andrew M, Mitnitski A (2008) Reliability of the hierarchical assessment of balance and mobility in frail older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 56:1213–1217
29. Amador LF, Loera JA (2007) Preventing postoperative falls in the older adult. J Am Coll Surg 204:447–453
30. Gillis A, MacDonald B (2005) Deconditioning in the hospitalized elderly. Can Nurse 101:16–20
31. Brown CJ, Friedkin RJ, Inouye SK (2004) Prevalence and outcomes of low mobility in hospitalized older patients. J Am Geriatr Soc 52:1263–1270
32. Amemiya T, Oda K, Ando M et al (2007) Activities of daily living and quality of life of elderly patients after elective surgery for gas­tric and colorectal cancers. Ann Surg 246:222–228
33. Morris PE, Goad A, Thompson C, Taylor K, Harry B, Passmore L, Ross A, Anderson L, Baker S, Sanchez M, Penley L, Howard A, Dixon L, Leach S, Small R, Hite RD, Haponik E (2008) Early intensive care unit mobility therapy in the treatment of acute respi­ratory failure. Crit Care Med 36:2238–2243
34. Schweickert WD, Pohlman MC, Pohlman AS, Nigos C, Pawlik AJ, Esbrook CL, Spears L, Miller M, Franczyk M, Deprizio D, Schmidt GA, Bowman A, Barr R, McCallister KE, Hall JB, Kress JP (2009) Early physical and occupational therapy in mechanically ventilated, critically ill patients: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 373(9678):1874–1882
35. John AD, Sieber FE (2004) Age associated issues: geriatrics. Anesthesiol Clin North America 22:45–58
36. Sauvaget C, Yamada M, Fujiwara S et al (2002) Dementia as a pre­dictor of functional disability. A four-year follow-up study. Gerontology 48(4):226–233
37. Shlipak MG, Stehman-Breen C, Fried LF et al (2004) The presence of frailty in elderly persons with chronic renal insufficiency. Am J Kidney Dis 43(5):861–867
38. Ferrucci L, Guralnik JM, Studenski S (2004) Designing random­ized, controlled trials aimed at preventing or delaying functional decline and disability in frail, older persons: a consensus report. J Am Geriatr Soc 52(4):625–634
39. Fried LF, Lee JS, Shlipak M et al (2006) Chronic kidney disease and functional limitation in older people: health, aging and body composition study. J Am Geriatr Soc 54:750–756
40. Beliveau MM, Multach M (2003) Perioperative care for the elderly patient. Med Clin North Am 87:273–289
41. Cunha BA Urinary tract infections, males. eMedicine from WebMD. http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/231574-overview. Accessed 12 September 2009
42. Rupp ME, Fitzgerald T, Marion N et al (2004) Effect of silver­coated urinary catheters: efficacy, cost-effectiveness, and antimi­crobial resistance. Am J Infect Control 32:445–450
43. Schumm K, Lam TB (2008) Types of urethral catheters for manage­ment of short-term voiding problems in hospitalized adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 16:CD004013
44. Hazelett SE, Tsai M, Gareri M et al (2006) The association between indwelling urinary catheter use in the elderly and urinary tract infection in acute care. BMC Geriatr 6:15
45. Foxman B (2002) Epidemiology of urinary tract infections: inci­dence, morbidity, and economic costs. Am J Med 113(Suppl 1A):5S–13S
46. Feldman C (2001) Pneumonia in the elderly. Med Clin North Am 85:1441–1459
47. Mehta RM, Niederman MS (2002) Nosocomial pneumonia. Curr Opin Infect Dis 15:387–394
48. Niederman MS, Brito V (2007) Pneumonia in the older patient. Clin Chest Med 28:751–771
49. Tablan OC, Anderson LJ, Besser R et al (2004) Guidelines for pre­venting health-care-associated pneumonia, 2003. MMWR Recomm Rep 53:1–36
37529 Common Perioperative Complications in Older Patients
https://t.me/med1917
50. Neumayer L, Hosowana P, Itani K et al (2007) Multivariable predic­tors of postoperative surgical site infection in general and vascular surgery: results from the patient safety in surgery study. J Am Coll Surg 204:1178–1187
51. Kirby JP, Mazuski JE (2009) Prevention of surgical site infection. Surg Clin North Am 89:365–389
52. Barie PS, Eachempati SR (2005) Surgical site infections. Surg Clin North Am 85:1115–1135
53. Kaye KS, Anderson DJ, Sloane R et al (2009) The effect of surgical site infection on older operative patients. J Am Geriatr Soc 57(1): 45–54
54. Dellinger EP, Hausmann SM, Bratzler DW et al (2005) Hospitals collaborate to decrease surgical site infections. Am J Surg 190:9–15
55. Devereaux PJ, Yang H, Yusuf S, for the POISE Study Group et al (2008) Effects of extended-release metoprolol succinate in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery (POISE trial): a randomized con­trolled trial. Lancet 371:1839–1847
56. McGory ML, Maggard MA, Ko CK (2005) A meta-analysis of peri­operative beta blockade: what is the actual risk reduction? Surgery 138:171–179
57. Auerback AD, Goldman L (2002) Beta-blockers and reduction of cardiac events in noncardiac surgery. JAMA 287(11):1435–1444
58. Lindenauer PK, Pekow P, Wang K et al (2005) Perioperative beta­blocker therapy and mortality after major noncardiac surgery. N Engl J Med 353:349–361
59. Fleischmann KE, Goldman L, Young B et al (2003) Association between cardiac and noncardiac complications in patients undergo­ing noncardiac surgery: outcomes and effects on length of stay. Am J Med 115(7):515–520
60. Kulaylat MN, Dayton MT (2008) Surgical complications. In: Townsend CM Jr, Beauchamp RD, Evers BM, Mattox KL (eds) Sabiston textbook of surgery, 18th edn. Saunders Elsevier, Philadelphia, PA, pp 338–347
61. Jin F, Chung F (2001) Minimizing perioperative adverse events in the elderly. Br J Anaesth 87(4):608–624
62. Polanczyk CA, Marcantonio E, Goldman L et al (2001) Impact of age on perioperative complications and length of stay in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. Ann Intern Med 134:637–643
63. Mehta RH, Rathore SS, Radford MJ et al (2001) Acute myocardial infarction in the elderly: differences by age. J Am Coll Cardiol 38:736
64. Woon VC, Lim KH (2003) Acute myocardial infarction in the elderly-differences compared with the young. Singapore Med J 44(8):414–418
65. Lindenauer PK, Fitzgerald J, Hoople N et al (2004) The potential preventability of postoperative myocardial infarction. Arch Intern Med 164:762–766
66. Ryder DL (2008) The use of beta-blockers to decrease adverse peri­operative cardiac events. Dimens Crit Care Nurs 27(2):47–53
67. Badner NH, Knill RL, Brown JE et al (1998) Myocardial infarction after noncardiac surgery. Anesthesiology 88(3):572–578
68. Martinez EA, Pronovost P (2002) Perioperative beta-blockers in high-risk patients. J f Crit Care 17(2):105–113
69. Loran DB, Hyde BR, Zwischenberger JB (2005) Perioperative management of special populations: the geriatric patient. Surg Clin North Am 85:1259–1266
70. Amar D, Zhang H, Leung DHY et al (2002) Older age is the stron­gest predictor of postoperative atrial fibrillation. Anesthesiology 96:352–356
71. Ramsay JG (1999) Cardiac management in the ICU. Chest 115(5 Suppl):138S–144S
72. Amar D (2008) Prevention and management of perioperative arrhythmias in the thoracic surgical population. Anesthesiol Clin 26(2):325–335
73. Goodman S, Weiss Y, Weissman C (2008) Update on cardiac arrhythmias in the ICU. Curr Opin Crit Care 14(5):549–554
74. Fang MC, Chen J, Rich MW (2007) Atrial fibrillation in the elderly. Am J Med 120:481–487
75. Douketis JD, Berger PB, Dunn AS et al (2008) The perioperative management of antithrombotic therapy. Chest 133:299S–339S
76. Amar D, Zhang H, Roistacher N (2002) The incidence and outcome of ventricular arrhythmias after noncardiac thoracic surgery. Anesth Analg 95:537–543
77. Gage BF, Waterman AD, Shannon W et al (2001) Validation of clinical classification schemes for predicting stroke: results from the National Registry of Atrial Fibrillation. JAMA 285:2864–2870
78. Gilmore JC (2003) Heart failure and treatment: part II Perianesthesia management. J Perianesth Nurs 18:242–246
79. Gutierrez C, Blanchard DB (2004) Diastolic heart failure: chal­lenges of diagnosis and treatment. Am Fam Physician 69:2609–2616
80. Roche JJW, Wenn RT, Sahota O et al (2005) Effect of comorbidities and postoperative complications on mortality after hip fracture in elderly people: prospective observational cohort study. BMJ 331:1374–1378
81. Hernandez AF, Newby LK, O’Connor CM (2004) Preoperative evaluation for major noncardiac surgery: focusing on heart failure. Arch Intern Med 164(13):1729–1736
82. Ergina PL, Gold SL, Meakins JL (1993) Perioperative care of the elderly patient. World J Surg 17:192–198
83. Brooks-Brunn JA (1997) Predictors of postoperative pulmonary complications following abdominal surgery. Chest 111:564–571
84. McAlister FA, Bertsch K, Man J et al (2005) Incidence of and risk factors for pulmonary complications after nonthoracic surgery. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 171(5):514–517
85. Gabeau D, Rosenthal RA (2001) Preoperative evaluation of the elderly surgical patient. In: Rosenthal RA, Zenilman ME, Katlic MR (eds) Principles and practice of geriatric surgery, 1st edn. Springer, New York, NY, pp 126–143
86. Kikawada M, Iwamoto T, Takasaki M (2005) Aspiration in the elderly. Drugs Aging 22:115–130
87. Cook DJ, Rooke GA (2003) Priorities in perioperative geriatrics. Anesth Analg 96:1823–1836
88. Marik PE, Kaplan D (2003) Aspiration pneumonia and dysphagia in the elderly. Chest 124:328–336
89. Arozullah AM, Daley J, Henderson WG et al (2000) Multifactorial risk index for predicting postoperative respiratory failure in men after major noncardiac surgery. Ann Surg 232:242–253
90. Gore DC (2007) Preoperative maneuvers to avert postoperative respiratory failure in elderly patients. Gerontology 53:438–444
91. Mendez-Tellez PA, Dorman T (2008) Postoperative respiratory fail­ure. In: Cameron JL (ed) Current surgical therapy. Mosby, Baltimore, MD, pp 1196–1201
92. El Sohl AA, Bhat A, Gunen H et al (2004) Extubation failure in the elderly. Respir Med 98:661–668
93. Schneider GT, Christensen N, Doerr TD (2009) Early tracheotomy in elderly patients results in less ventilator-associated pneumonia. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 140:250–255
94. Jaffer AK, Brotman DJ (2006) Prevention of venous thromboembo­lism in the geriatric patient. Clin Geriatr Med 22(1):93–111
95. Kim V, Spandorfer J (2001) Epidemiology of venous thromboem­bolic disease. Emerg Med Clin North Am 19(4):839–859
96. Piazza G, Seddighzadeh A, Goldhaber SZ (2008) Deep-vein throm­bosis in the elderly. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost 14:393–398
97. Di Minno G, Tifano A (2004) Challenges in the prevention of venous thromboembolism in the elderly. J Thromb Haemost 2: 1292–1298
98. Kumar A, Carson JL (2008) Perioperative anemia in the elderly. Clin Geriatr Med 24:641–648
99. Conlon NP, Bale EP, Herbison GP et al (2008) Postoperative ane­mia and quality of life after primary hip arthroplasty in patients over 65 years old. Anesth Analg 106:1056–1061
376 S.A. Lagoo-Deenadayalan et al.
https://t.me/med1917
100. Foss NB, Kristensen MT, Kehlet H (2008) Anaemia impedes func­tional mobility after hip fracture surgery. Age Aging 37:173–178
101. Foss NB, Kristensen MT, Jensen PS et al (2009) The effects of liberal versus restrictive transfusion thresholds on ambulation after hip fracture surgery. Transfusion 49:227–234
102. Wu W, Rathore SS, Wang Y et al (2001) Blood transfusion in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 345:1230–1236
103. Sarasin SM, Walton MJ, Singh HP, Clark DI (2006) Can a urinary tract symptom score predict the development of postoperative uri­nary retention in patients undergoing lower limb arthroplasty under spinal anaesthesia? A prospective study. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 88:394–398
104. Keita H, Diouf E, Tubach F, Brouwer T, Dahmani S, Mantz J, Desmonts J (2005) Predictive factors of early postoperative uri­nary retention in the postanesthesia care unit. Anesth Analg 101:592–596
105. Changchien CR, Yeh CY, Huang ST, Hsieh M, Chen J, Tang R (2007) Postoperative urinary retention after primary colorectal cancer resection via laparotomy: a prospective study of 2355 con­secutive patients. Dis Colon Rectum 50:1688–1696
106. Frocht A, Fillit H (1984) Renal disease in the geriatric patient. J Am Geriatr Soc 32:28–39
107. Go AS, Chertow GM, Fan D, McCulloch CE, Hsu CY (2004) Chronic kidney disease and the risks of death, cardiovascular events, and hospitalization. N Engl J Med 351:1296–1305
108. Kellerman PS (1994) Perioperative care of the renal patient. Arch Intern Med 154:1674–1688
109. Kohli HS, Bhaskaran MC, Muthukumar T, Thennarasu K, Sud K, Jha V, Gupta KL, Sakhuja V (2000) Treatment-related acute renal failure in the elderly: a hospital-based prospective study. Nephrol Dial Transplant 15:212–217
110. Harmankaya O, Kaptanogullari H, Obek A (2002) Acute renal failure in the elderly: a five-year experience. Ren Fail 24:223–225
111. Sesso R, Roque A, Vicioso B, Stella S (2004) Prognosis of ARF in hospitalized elderly patients. Am J Kidney Dis 44:410–419
112. Noorgate NVD, Mouton V, Lamot C, Nooten GV, Dhondt A, Vanholder R, Afschrift M, Lameire N (2003) Outcome in a post­cardiac surgery population with acute renal failure requiring dialy­sis: does age make a difference? Nephrol Dial Transplant 18:732–736
113. Azevedo V, Silveira M, Santos J, Braz J, Braz L, Modolo N (2008) Postoperative renal function evaluation, through RIFLE criteria, of elderly patients who underwent femur fracture surgery under spi­nal anesthesia. Ren Fail 30:485–490
114. Schmitt R, Coca S, Kanbay M, Tinetti ME, Cantley LG, Parikh CR (2008) Recovery of kidney function after acute kidney injury in the elderly: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Kidney Dis 52:262–271
115. Cheung CM, Ponnusamy A, Anderton JG (2008) Management of acute renal failure in the elderly patient: a clinician’s guide. Drugs Aging 25:455–476
116. Bardacki H, Cheema FH, Topkara VK, Dang NC, Martens TP, Mercando ML, Forster CS, Benson AA, George I, Russo MJ, Oz MC, Esrig BC (2007) Discharge home rates are significantly lower for octogenarians undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 83:483–489
117. Apfel CC, Laara E, Koivuranta M et al (1999) A simplified risk score for predicting postoperative nausea and vomiting. Anesthesiology 91:693–700
118. Pierre S, Benais H, Pouymayou J (2002) Apfel’s simplified score may favourably predict the risk of postoperative nausea and vomit­ing. Can J Anaesth 49:237–242
119. Martin G, Glass PS, Breslin DS et al (2003) A study of anesthetic drug utilization in different age groups. J Clin Anesth 15(3):194–200
120. Gan TJ, Meyer T, Apfel CC et al (2003) Consensus guidelines for managing postoperative nausea and vomiting. Anesth Analg 97:62–71
121. Adanir T, Aksun M, Ozgϋrbϋz U, Altin F, Sencan A (2008) Does preoperative hydration affect postoperative nausea and vomiting? A randomized, controlled trial. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 18(1):1–4
122. El Solh A, Okada M, Bhat A, Pietrantoni C (2003) Swallowing disorders postorotracheal intubation in the elderly. Intensive Care Med 29:1451–1455
123. Marik PE (2001) Aspiration pneumonitis and aspiration pneumo­nia. N Engl J Med 344:665–671
124. Barquist E, Brown M, Cohn S et al (2001) Postextubation fiberop­tic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing after prolonged endotra­cheal intubation: a randomized, prospective trial. Crit Care Med 29:1710–1713
125. Spechler SJ (1992) Epidemiology and natural history of gastro­oesophageal reflux disease. Digestion 51(Suppl 1):24–29, Review
126. Hendry PO, Hausel J, Nygren J, Lassen K, Dejong CH, Lungqvist O, Fearon KC (2009) Determinants of outcome after colorectal resection within an enhanced recovery programme. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Study Group. Br J Surg 96:197–205
127. Raue W, Langelotz C, Neub H, Müller JM, Schwenk W (2000) “Fast-track” rehabilitation to enhance recovery after ileostomy closure – a prospective clinical trial. Zentralbl Chir 133(5): 486–490
128. Chen HH, Wexner SD, Iroatulam AJ et al (2000) Laparoscopic colectomy compares favorably with colectomy by laparotomy for reduction of postoperative ileus. Dis Colon Rectum 43(1):61–65
129. Schlachta CM, Burpee SE, Fernandez C et al (2007) Optimizing recovery after laparoscopic colon surgery (ORAL-CS). Surg Endosc 21:2212–2219
130. Kehlet H, Wilmore DW (2002) Multimodal strategies to improve surgical outcome. Am J Surg 183:630–641
131. Taguchi A, Sharma N, Saleem RM, Sessler DI, Carpenter RL, Seyedsadr M, Kurz A (2001) Selective postoperative inhibition of gastrointestinal opioid receptors. N Engl J Med 345(13):935–940
132. Akca O, Doufas AG, Sessler DI (2002) Use of selective opiate receptor inhibitors to prevent postoperative ileus. Minerva Anestesiol 68(4):162–165
Chapter 30
https://t.me/med1917
Management and Outcomes of Intensive Care in the Geriatric Surgical Patient
Gary T. Marshall and Scott R. Gunn
Introduction
Should we admit geriatric patients to the intensive care unit (ICU) at all? Of course, we believe the answer to this ques­tion is a qualified “yes”; otherwise, our chapter would be brief indeed. But, it is important to remember that rationing health care based upon age has been advocated as a strategy for limiting cost [1]. Refusal of ICU admission is common across many developed countries and has been reported to range between 24 and 46% of requested admissions [2–6]. In these studies, advanced age and previously poor functional status are the most common reasons for refusal to admit to the ICU. In 2004, Sinuf and coworkers systematically reviewed rationing of ICU resources and found that age and severity of illness were most strongly associated with a refusal to admit to the ICU [7]. Admission to the ICU carries with it a large commitment of health care resources. If we admit geriatric patients, how do we best allocate costly and limited ICU resources? At a time when the numbers of geri­atric ICU patients [8] and the costs associated with ICU care are rapidly increasing, it becomes important to examine what outcomes can be expected if we are to provide ICU care to elderly patients.
Outcomes
Mortality
rates markedly lower than in a matched population (93%)
9]. Others have reported mortality rates in critically ill
[ patients ³85 years of 30% at ICU discharge, 43% at 30 days posthospital discharge, and 64% at 1 year [10]. In addition, age is an independent variable in many prognostic scoring systems such as Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II [11], APACHE III [12], and the Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) II [13].
But, chronologic age alone is not the whole story. In one study, the impact of age on outcome weakened as the severity of the acute illness (or physiologic derangement) increased [14]. Margulies and coworkers found ICU mortality among surgical patients related to severity of illness (evaluated as SAPS) and did not differ significantly between nonagenarians and younger patients when stratified for SAPS [15]. In two reports of patients admitted to medical ICUs, old age no longer predicted mortality when acute severity of illness, diagnosis, and prior health were taken into account [16, 17]. As is clear from other chapters on physiologic changes asso­ciated with aging, the elderly are less able to maintain homeostasis in the face of pathologic stressors than are younger patients. It is to be expected, therefore, that they will have more marked derangements for any given “insult” (e.g., injury, infection, or surgical procedure) than the young. In other words, prognostic scoring systems which examine abnormal physiology such as the APACHE III or SAPS II should be expected to reflect increased mortality not only as a result of increased age but also – and perhaps more importantly – as a result of a decreased ability to maintain homeostasis.
Mortality has traditionally been the primary outcome used to assess health care delivery. Mortality among elderly patients is substantial following hospital discharge. In a study of medical and surgical patients ³70 years, 1-year survival was 56% in patients aged <85 years and 27% in those ³85 years –
G.T. Marshall (*) Department of Trauma Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA e-mail: marshallgt@upmc.edu
R.A. Rosenthal et al. (eds.), Principles and Practice of Geriatric Surgery, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4419-6999-6_30, © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011
Health-Related Quality of Life
While mortality remains an important metric for assessing health care, other outcomes such as quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), postdischarge placement status, and health­related quality of life (HR-QOL) are becoming increasingly relevant. To date, the largest review of HR-QOL literature in elderly patients after admission to the ICU was authored by
377
378 G.T. Marshall and S.R. Gunn
https://t.me/med1917
Hennessy and colleagues in 2005 [18]. After an extensive MEDLINE review, they identified 16 studies that examined HR-QOL or functional status in geriatric patients after ICU admission. These studies included a total of 3,247 elderly survivors of critical care whose HR-QOL or functional status was assessed after ICU discharge. In their review, these investigators were limited in their ability to synthesize results across multiple studies results by study heterogeneity. For example, the authors found that most studies used varying assessments of severity of illness, chronic illness and prior functional status. They found a lack of consensus regarding definition of “elderly” and evaluation of outcomes using various methods and at various times. In addition, many studies suffer from a potential selection bias arising from criteria or policies for ICU admission [19]. Studies usually evaluate convenience samples of patients admitted to an ICU; information about potentially eligible patients who were not admitted is uncommon. Finally, most studies are ICU-based or institution-based rather than population-based and thus are limited by referral bias.
Despite limitations, these investigators found that the majority of published literature in this field (10 of 16 reviewed studies) supports the concept that aged ICU survivors main­tain a good functional status and/or HR-QOL. There were some exceptions. For example, Vasquez Mata and coworkers found that their elderly cohort had the most reduction in HR-QOL as compared to a younger cohort [20]. Of note, Vasquez Mata used an assessment tool primarily focused on physical functioning without a subjective assessment of HR-QOL. While physical functioning plays a role in HR-QOL, other significant domains include social function­ing, pain, fatigue, and ability to perform activities of daily living. It is possible that while physical function may decrease for geriatric ICU survivors, other domains may become more important in their overall assessment of HR-QOL. In another significant study, Montuclard and coworkers found that inde­pendence in activities of daily living was significantly decreased for elderly ICU survivors [21]. However, their unique inception cohort (subjects with an ICU length of stay >30 days) may limit this study’s generalizability.
In the largest, single-center outcome study of geriatric patients who survive ICU admission (published after the review by Hennessy), Kaarlola and coinvestigators evaluated 883 elderly ICU survivors and 1,827 controls [22]. They found
that cumulative 3-year mortality was higher among the aged (57% vs. 40% in the control group). Most (66%) elderly non­survivors died within 1 month of ICU discharge (Fig. 30.1).
In addition, geriatric patients had significantly fewer
QALYs than age- and sex-matched controls. However, 97% of the geriatric survivors lived at home. 88% described their present state of health as good or satisfactory. In fact, 66% found it similar or better than 12 months prior, and 48% found it similar or better than before ICU admission.
Other Factors
The relation of age and severity of illness to mortality is further modified by specific diagnosis. In one study, patients admitted following trauma had the highest long-term sur­vival compared to other diagnostic groups in a mixed ICU [23]. Age, severity of illness, and diagnosis were indepen­dent predictors of 1-year survival in a recent study of medical and surgical patients ³70 years of age [9]. In a study in which many of the patients were admitted to the ICU following surgery or trauma, the survival of those who were alive 6 months following hospital discharge approached that of an age-, year-, and gender- matched general population [24]. The interaction of prior functional status and age may also influence mortality. In one study, patients ³75 years of age who had functional limitations were six times more likely to die in hospital than those aged 50–64 years without limita­tions [25]. Among patients without functional limitation, there was no difference in mortality between the youngest and oldest groups. Physical activity status and quality of life prior to admission were significant predictors of survival in a mixed ICU population with large proportions of older and chronically ill patients [26].
Conclusions
As age increases and functional status declines, patients may become more willing to accept aggressive medical therapy. For example, Sage and coauthors found that increasing age was inversely related to patients’ assessments of quality of life following discharge, but not to objective scores of physi­cal and psychosocial disability [27]. These observations are consistent with the concept that individual and societal views of quality of life do not necessarily coincide in older patients, who may be more accepting of health-related limitations in life style than young patients [ is needed to accurately characterize the mortality and HR-QOL of elderly survivors of critical illness, currently, we believe that despite a higher mortality, aged patients with a reasonable preadmission functional status and severity of ill­ness can likely be expected to benefit from ICU admission. It is probable that postdischarge functional status will be less than that of younger ICU survivors; however, elderly ICU survivors are likely to be satisfied with their postdischarge HR-QOL and may even rate it higher than preadmission. In the rest of this chapter, we examine common ICU-related problems as they relate to geriatric patients: respiratory failure, delirium, shock and hemodynamic monitoring, acute kidney injury and renal replacement therapy, nutrition, and finally care of the dying patient.
27, 28]. While more research
37930 Management and Outcomes of Intensive Care in the Geriatric Surgical Patient
40%
37%
29%
70%
13%
32%
17%
10%
Satisfied Ambivalent Unsatisfied
59%
Very Good Good
Fair Poor Don’t know
27%
31%
26%
30%
Self Evaluation of Health Status
Satisfied with Present State of Health
9%
1%
1%
10%
<65 Yrs 65 Yrs
<65 Yrs 65 Yrs
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
35%
30%
25%
20%
15%
10%
5%
0%
https://t.me/med1917
Fi g u r e 30.1 Health status and satisfaction among geriatric and younger
ICU survivors. Rockwood and coworkers interviewed 143 geriatric (³65 years) and 225 younger (<65 years) ICU survivors. They found no significant differences between the groups in self-evaluation of health
Respiratory Insufficiency and Failure
Changes in Pulmonary Function Associated with Aging
The aging process affects every aspect of respiratory physi­ology and oxygen transport, with important consequences for the geriatric patient with critical illness [29]. Pulmonary complications and adverse pulmonary events are common in elderly patient, following even elective surgical procedures [30–33]. The age-related changes that are most clinically relevant include declines in vital capacity, forced expiratory volume in 1 s, alveolar–arterial oxygen gradient, arterial oxy­gen tension, and maximal oxygen consumption. Ventilatory responses to hypoxia and hypercarbia are blunted [34, 35] Also relevant for the aged surgical patient is decreased sensi­tivity of the airways to noxious stimuli. Diminished airway sensitivity to stimuli such as refluxed gastric fluid in addition to impaired mucociliary transport and decreased cough strength renders the elderly patient at increased risk of silent pulmonary aspiration [36].
status (top figure). However, they did find a statistically significant dif­ference between groups (asterisk) in the number of respondents who were satisfied with their present state of health (data from Rockwood et al. [28]).
Outcomes
Outcomes of geriatric patients who require mechanical ven­tilation have been the focus of a number of conflicting reports. A hospital mortality of 52% and 1-year mortality of 63% have been identified in data compiled from multiple studies [19]. Age, severity of illness, comorbidity, and diag­nosis are predictors of outcome in ventilated geriatric patients, as they are in elderly critically ill patients in general [19, 37]. In some studies, prolonged ventilation (defined as 15 days in one study and a total score of more than 100 for the number of days of ventilation plus age in years in another) has been accompanied by poor outcomes [37, 38], whereas in others, the duration of mechanical ventilation has not been significantly related to outcome [39, 40]. In a study of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), age >60 was associated with a fivefold increase in mortality, presumably because of age-related impairments in cardio­pulmonary regulatory mechanisms [29]. However other investigators have not found a statistically significant increase in mortality in elderly patients with ARDS [41]. In one of the largest studies on this question, Esteban and coauthors
380 G.T. Marshall and S.R. Gunn
https://t.me/med1917
Fi g u r e 30.2 Comparison of the time of ventilatory support (days of
mechanical ventilation and days of weaning) and time of stay in the intensive care unit and in the hospital between patients aged from 43 to 70 years (middle age group) and patients older than 70 years (elderly
recently reviewed the database from the International Mechanical Ventilation Study [42] (n = 5,183) and found that patients >70 of age had similar intensity of care as compared to younger patients [43]. Their work supports conclusions of others that age alone is not a sufficient reason to withhold mechanical ventilation. They found that the most important risk factors for death in the elderly patient requiring mechan­ical ventilation were coexistent acute renal failure, shock, and limited functional status (Fig. 30.2).
Clinical Management
In our practice, we have found a number of techniques clin­ically useful on a daily basis. First, we avoid or minimize narcotics when at all possible in the aged. We have found regional techniques such as epidural analgesia or paraverte­bral blocks to be useful. Parenteral narcotics have been associated with more frequent respiratory disturbances following surgery, and regional techniques for pain man­agement and nonnarcotic analgesics may therefore be particularly valuable in the geriatric patient [30]. It is
also important to eliminate other medications, which might contribute to delirium in the aged patient, for example,
group). The white boxes correspond to patients who survive and the gray boxes to nonsurvivors. Box plot indicates the median and the inter- quantile range. Bar indicates the minimum and the maximum number of days (from Esteban et
al. [43]. Reprinted with permission).
anticholinergics. Nonsteroidal pain relief would seem useful in this setting, but in practice, many elderly patients have absolute or relative contraindications to their use [44]. Second, we mobilize elderly patients as soon as possible. Assuming an upright position increases the functional residual capacity and should lessen the closure of small air­ways that is caused by the supine position. Oxygen con­sumption following thoracotomy is lower in the sitting than the supine position, suggesting that the work of breathing may be lessened when upright [45].
In the elderly, at-risk patient who is not mechanically ven­tilated, measures such as incentive spirometry (IS) and other lung recruitment maneuvers complement the basic measures of pain management and mobilization. We use a staged approach for managing pulmonary toileting in aged, com­promised patients. First, we start with IS every 6 h. If patients are unable to attain volumes of at least 8–10 ml/kg ideal body weight on IS, then we add a noninvasive, lung expansion therapy: a single-use device attached to an oxygen flowmeter that provides positive airway pressure throughout the respi­ratory cycle. We continue to monitor IS volumes every 6 h while maintaining lung recruitment. Finally, if volumes are still below the desired 8–10 ml/kg, we initiate noninvasive pressure support ventilation while continuing to follow IS volumes when patients are off noninvasive ventilation.
38130 Management and Outcomes of Intensive Care in the Geriatric Surgical Patient
Host factors
Critical illness related factors Iatrogenic factors
Age Alcoholism Apolipoprotein E4 Polymorphism Cognitive
impairment Depression Hypertension Smoking Vision or hearing loss
Acidosis Anemia Fever/infection/sepsis Hypotension Metabolic disturbances Fever/hypothermia End organ dysfunction Respiratory disease/
hypoxia
High severity of illness
Immobilization Catheters Medications Sleep disturbance
Source: Girard and Ely [53]
https://t.me/med1917
While the techniques of mechanical ventilation and weaning may not differ in the elderly, they may require a longer period of support, given the impairments imposed by age, comor­bidity, and acute illness. Caution should be exercised when liberating elderly patients from mechanical ventilation. Parameters used to predict successful weaning from mechan­ical ventilation in young patients appear less reliable in the elderly [46]. Even after successfully undergoing a trial of spontaneous breathing prior to extubation, elderly patients may not do as well as younger patients. The ARDSnet inves­tigators examined age as a factor affecting outcome from acute lung injury and ARDS [47]. They found that although patients >70 years of age were able to breathe spontaneously for 2 h without ventilator assistance – a commonly accepted weaning parameter – at a similar time point to younger patients, the older patients had inferior outcomes, such as higher reintubation rates, longer ICU and hospital stays, and lower survival rates at 28 days.
Delirium
Definition, Assessment, and Incidence
Delirium is an acute state of confusion that develops over a short period of time and fluctuates over time. It is often the result of underlying organic derangements, such as infection, medical illness, and drug use or withdrawal. Delirium can be distinguished from dementia by its acute onset and fluctuating course. The assessment of acute changes in cognition is dif­ficult in the ICU setting due to the severity of underlying disease and the frequent loss of verbal communication due to mechanical ventilation. One tool for assessment of delirium in the ICU, which was adapted from the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM), is the CAM-ICU [48]. It has been validated in several studies as being both highly sensi­tive and specific [48, 49]. Using CAM-ICU, delirium is diag- nosed in two steps. First, a standardized sedation scale, such as the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale [50] is used to determine the level of consciousness. Any patient not deter­mined to be comatose is then assessed for four features of delirium: (1) Acute onset of mental status changes or a fluc­tuating course, (2) inattention, (3) disorganized thinking, and (4) an altered level of consciousness. A diagnosis of delirium is made with the presence of both features (1) and (2) in addition to either feature (3) or (4) [48]. In a recent study of elderly patients admitted to the ICU, the rates of delirium were found to be >70% during their hospitalization. In the same study, the effect of dementia was also assessed. Patients with dementia had a 40% higher overall rate of delirium during hospitalization than those without dementia [51]. There is
little doubt that as the elderly population ages, the prevalence and burden of delirium in the ICU will grow.
Predisposing Factors
Predisposing Factors for Delirium in the ICU
The risk factors for delirium are divided into host factors, which are present on admission to the ICU, and precipitating factors, which occur during the course of illness. It is this second group of factors that are potentially modifiable and therefore the target of therapeutic or prophylactic interven­tion [52, 53] (Table 30.1).
The use of sedative and analgesic medications deserves special attention. Nearly all patients in the ICU receive these medications. However, their use is not without detrimental effects. These effects include prolonged mechanical ventila­tion and an increased utilization of diagnostic studies for altered mental status when sedatives are used in a continuous, rather than intermittent, fashion. Daily interruption of seda­tion is one method used to avoid this complication [54]. Benzodiazepines and anticholinergics have been consistently linked to delirium in the elderly [55]. Pisani and coworkers recently published data showing that use of a benzodiazepine or opioid was associated with increased delirium duration, especially the first episode (relative risk of 1.64 with a 95% confidence interval of 1.27–2.10) [56]. Trials of newer agents have shown some promise. In a 2007 trial by Pandharipande et al., the use of dexmedetomidine (an alpha 2 agonist) was compared to lorazepam in mechanically ventilated patients. The use of dexmedetomidine was associated with more delirium-free days than lorazepam [57]. The data regarding the use of opioids is less clear. A study by Ouimet and coworkers demonstrated higher daily use of opioids in ICU patients without delirium [58]. Similarly, in a study of hip­fracture patients, Morrison and coauthors found that patients treated liberally with opioid analgesics were less likely to
Ta b l e 30.1 Predisposing factors for delirium in the ICU
382 G.T. Marshall and S.R. Gunn
https://t.me/med1917
develop delirium than those who received less analgesia [59]. Meperidine is the exception, as it is consistently linked to the development of delirium, especially in the aged [60–62]. These findings point to the need for careful use of these agents with attention to providing adequate pain relief while avoiding oversedation.
Evaluation, Prevention, and Treatment
Once delirium is diagnosed, an underlying organic source must first be sought. A diminished level of consciousness may herald underlying infection or metabolic derange­ments, and these must be ruled out by careful history and physical examination. Within the ICU, risk factors more prevalent in the setting of critical illness must be addressed. These include infection, metabolic and electrolyte abnor­malities, and medication exposure. If critical illness related factors are ruled out, other interventions may prove useful in reducing delirium such as repeated reorientation of the patient and activities designed to be cognitively stimulating; a nonpharmacologic sleep protocol; early mobilization and range of motion exercise; prompt removal of restraints and catheters; use of eyeglasses and hearing aids; and the early correction of dehydration [63]. These results were con-
firmed in patients after hip fracture [64] and in hospital-
ized geriatric patients [65] but have not yet been studied in the ICU.
After the use of nonpharmacologic strategies to mini­mize risk factors and addressing the metabolic derange­ments associated with critical care illness, consideration should be given to the use of pharmacologic agents to manage the symptoms of delirium. Currently, the clinical practice guideline from the Society of Critical Care Medicine recommends haloperidol as the drug of choice for treatment of delirium in the ICU [66]. This is also true for the geriatric patient [67]. Using intermittent intravenous injection, a 2-mg dose is recommended. Repeated doses are administered if symptoms are not controlled, doubling the previously administered dose every 15–20 min until agita­tion resolves. Once controlled, scheduled doses are given every 4–6 h and then tapered over several days. Side effects of haloperidol include QT interval prolongation, extrapyra­midal symptoms, and neuroleptic malignant syndrome. Routine EKG monitoring is suggested to detect any QT prolongation [66]. Atypical antipsychotics, such as risperi­done, ziprasidone, quetiapine, and olanzapine, may also have a role in the management of delirium. Although no placebo-controlled studies of these agents exist, early data suggests that these agents may be at least as effective as haloperidol and may have fewer side effects [68].
Outcomes
Among ICU patients, numerous adverse events have been associated with delirium. These include unplanned extuba­tion, removal of catheters and drains, failed extubation, prolonged hospital stay, increased health care costs, and increased mortality. Milbrandt and colleagues studied patient charges in 275 consecutive, mechanically ventilated ICU patients and found the presence of delirium to be associated with 39% increased ICU cost (95% CI, 12–72%) and 31% higher hospital cost (95% CI, 1–70%) [69]. In addition to the acute adverse events associated with delirium in critically ill patients, multiple long-term detrimental effects have been noted. Ely and coworkers reported that delirium was associated with a threefold increase in the risk of death at 6 months [70]. Jackson and coauthors reviewed nine prospec­tive studies a diverse group of hospitalized and critically ill patients and reported that delirium during hospitalization was associated with a cognitive decline over the following 1–3 years [71].
Shock and Hemodynamic Monitoring
Changes in the Cardiovascular System Associated with Aging
During the course of aging, there are structural and func­tional changes within the heart and vasculature which become important in the critical care of the geriatric patient. For example, there is a significant decrease in the compliance and distensibility of the aorta and vascular tree. This stiffening of the arteries results in an increase in afterload. The results of the increased afterload include left ventricular hypertro­phy and decrease in diastolic compliance. Wall thickness increases of up to 30% have been documented. Diastolic compliance is also reduced, and when coupled with delayed diastolic filling observed in the elderly heart, results in nearly a 50% reduction in early diastolic ventricular filling. Ventricular filling becomes much more dependent on atrial contraction. Diastolic dysfunction and decreased left ventricular compli­ance means that the aging heart must achieve higher-end diastolic pressures to preserve preload and thus stroke volume. The clinical implications of these changes are that cardiac output is much more reliant on adequate preload and atrial systole. Hypovolemia must be avoided, and atrial arrhythmias must be controlled or addressed in the face of surgical stress and sepsis. In addition to normal age-related changes, clinicians must also take into account the effects of ischemic heart disease, which becomes increasingly prevalent
38330 Management and Outcomes of Intensive Care in the Geriatric Surgical Patient
https://t.me/med1917
with age. The Framingham Heart Study found that myocardial infarction was silent or unrecognized in over 40% of patients aged 75–84 years compared to under 20% in the group between age 45 and 54 years [72].
Monitoring and Management of Shock
Shock is best defined as a state of inadequate tissue perfu­sion. In the uncompensated state, it is easily recognized by tachycardia, oliguria, and hypotension. However, most critical care practitioners would prefer to recognize hypoper­fusion before overt decompensation. The initial monitoring of the critically ill patient should include close attention to the physical exam, arterial blood pressure monitoring, and the urine output. We have found these parameters – and more importantly, their change over time – most useful in deter­mining the response to resuscitative efforts, but they can fail to detect ongoing tissue hypoperfusion and hypoxia [73]. Even after hypotension has been corrected and urine output restored, a state of “compensated shock” may remain. In this condition, tissue hypoxia is ongoing, leading to multiple organ dysfunction and death. Hypoxia forces tissues to uti­lize anaerobic pathways, resulting in lactic acid production. Large amounts of H+ may then be produced. Base deficit, lactate level, and bicarbonate levels are frequently used to assess both the initial state of shock and to monitor the effects of ongoing resuscitation. Although no single end point is applicable to every scenario, it is important to repeatedly reexamine potentially “shocky” patients and follow them closely to determine the success or inadequacy of resuscitation.
The use of pulmonary artery catheters (PACs) is no longer de rigueur. There is currently no prospective evidence sup­porting their use. Friese and coworkers analyzed the National Trauma Data Bank and found higher mortality in trauma patients managed with a PAC. They did, however, find that those with severe injury who arrived in shock and older patients had a survival benefit when a PAC was used to guide management [74]. However, most evidence would contradict this. In a large meta-analysis, Shah and coworkers evaluated 13 randomized clinical trials. They concluded that in criti­cally ill patients, the use of PACs neither increased mortality or hospital days nor did it confer benefit. The absence of benefit may have been the result of the lack of any clear or specific guidelines for treatment based on the data collected [75]. The PAC catheter was often used to drive “supranormal resuscitation,” which sought to maximize cardiac index (>4.5 l/min/m2) and oxygen delivery index (>600 ml/min/
m2). Achieving these goals was associated with an increase
in survival; however, there was no prospective evidence to suggest a benefit to attempting to attain these goals. Rather,
the ability to achieve these goals appears to be a marker of the patient’s physiologic reserve [76].
Mixed central venous oxygen saturation (SCVO2) may be a useful adjunct in determining the adequacy of oxygen delivery. A value of >70% is considered to be normal. Lower values are consistent with flow-dependent delivery of oxygen, and a variety of strategies have been published using SCVO2 as an end point for resuscitation. The most promising strategy was published by Rivers and coworkers in a group of patients with septic shock presenting to the emergency department. An early goal-directed resuscitation strategy aimed at achiev­ing an SCVO2 of ³70% resulted in a significant decrease in mortality (46.5% in the control group vs. 30.5% in the treat­ment group) [77]. Of interest, the mean age in the treatment group was 67.1 years (±17.4 SD).
Resuscitation with crystalloid, blood and the administra­tion of vasopressors are all methods to improve tissue oxygen delivery [58]. Guidelines for the optimal use of these tech­niques are varied, and each approach is not without compli­cations. Early restoration of circulating blood volume with blood products and crystalloid is crucial, especially in the elderly who are more dependent on effective ventricular filling to maximize cardiac output. In the early phase of resuscita­tion, fluids are probably superior to vasopressors for the maintenance of blood pressure [78]. Care, however, must be taken to avoid excessive amounts of crystalloid as this has been linked to cardiac and pulmonary complications, coagu­lopathy, and acid–base disturbances [79]. Transfusion of blood to restore adequate oxygen carrying capacity is vital in cases of frank anemia, but exact triggers for transfusion in the elderly are still debated. The Hebert study suggests a transfusion threshold value of <7 g/dl of hemoglobin, and this recommendation has been widely adopted. This study, however, excluded patients with chronic anemia, ischemic heart disease, or any patient in whom the attending physician was unwilling to tolerate a transfusion trigger of <7 g/dl [80]. In elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction, a lower 30-day mortality was associated with blood transfusion for hematocrit values <30% [81]. A hematocrit of <30% during operation is predictive of postoperative delirium [82]. Other studies have documented increased myocardial ischemia when intraoperative or postoperative hematocrit fell below 28% [83, 84]. Given the high incidence of ischemic cardiac disease – often silent in the elderly – care should be taken in setting a “one-size-fits-all” transfusion trigger in the geriatric population.
Once effective volume has been restored, inotropes may be required to augment oxygen delivery. The effects of aging can influence the choice of agents. In elderly patients, the response to b-agonists declines, with subsequent reduction in the inotropic, chronotropic, and vasodilatory effects of these medications. With these changes, nonadrenergic effects