Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_2679_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
41 Мб
Скачать
36 Chronic Pain: New Molecular Insights into Pain and Treatment
https://t.me/medicina_free
such distinct lines of pain pathways are unlikely, especially in case of pathological pain or central pain. Thus, it becomes critical to distinguish physiological pain from pathological pain. While it is true that under physiological conditions, some proteins are selective in pain transmission, chronic pain is likely mediated by a network.
In addition to selective lines of involvement, the contribution of peripheral sensitized activity and central plasticity to chronic pain may be simple additive or liner (see Figure 1). For certain types of pain, the cen­tral plasticity may be driven, and even maintained, by peripheral sensi­tized inputs. Thus, the removal or inhibition of abnormal inputs will lead to a significant reduction in chronic pain. However, in other cases, while peripheral inputs may still play minor roles, central potentiation may take over and play a major role in ongoing chronic pain. In such cases, inhibit­ing peripheral inputs may be insufficient, and in some cases, it is difficult to clearly identify which peripheral inputs are responsible for chronic pain.
Peripheral nerves and DRG cells
There are two major classes of peripheral nociceptors: unmyelinated C fibers and small-myelinated Aδ fibers. C fibers are small-diameter unmy­elinated fibers with small-diameter cell bodies. Whereas, Aδ fibers have medium-diameter unmyelinated fibers. Each nociceptor can be divided into different subgroups according to their responses to different forms of sensory stimuli (thermal, mechanical, and chemical) or the chemicals they express. The cell bodies of nociceptors are generally located in the DRG. For the facial sensory nociceptors, they are located in trigeminal and nodose ganglia. Although the sizes of DRGs have often been used to iden­tify nociceptors, it may not be appropriate to be used in case of visceral pain. Many somas of visceral nociceptors are larger than the DRG somas of somatic nociceptors. Performing electrophysiological recordings from nerve fibers and cells is the most reliable way to study the function of peripheral nociceptors.
Peripheral noxious stimuli activate peripheral nociceptive transducer receptors and/or ion channels causing membrane depolarization in
Peripheral Nociceptors and Sensitization 37
https://t.me/medicina_free
sensory DRG cells. Recent studies indicate that not all nociceptors have a response threshold as high as previously believed. Some nociceptors have lower thresholds, just like non-nociceptors. Recent studies indicate that transducer proteins include a family of proteins: TRPV1-4, TRPM8, and different subtypes of ATP receptors. It becomes clear that no single pro­tein or gene is responsible for a specific sensory process, such as heat pain or cold sensation (see Table 1).
Under physiological conditions, noxious stimuli stimulate both non­noxious and nociceptive fibers. It is almost impossible to deliver a selec­tive noxious stimulus without activating some form of non-nociceptive receptors. In pathological pain conditions, typical allodynia — triggered by non-noxious stimulation — is also unlikely due to the selective activa­tion of nociceptive fibers (Figure 1). Two voltage-gated sodium channel alpha subunits, Nav1.7 and Nav1.8, are expressed at high levels in nocic­eptor terminals. Deleting Nav1.7 has no effect on the development of neuropathic pain, and double knockouts of both Nav1.7 and Nav1.8 also develop normal levels of neuropathic pain. Inflammatory pain and mechanical and thermal acute pain were altered [1]. A recent study by Peirs et al. provides strong evidence that the neural circuits conveying mechanical allodynia in the dorsal horn differ by the nature of the injury [2]. Calretinin neurons in lamina II inner convey mechanical allodynia induced by inflammatory injuries, while protein kinase C gamma (PKCγ) neurons at the lamina II/III border convey mechanical allodynia induced by neuropathic injuries. It is safe to say that each sensory modality, or sensation, is a function of a specially organized neuronal circuit and net­work, from the periphery to the cortex with some of the key proteins play­ing major roles.
Table 1. Peripheral nociceptors for spinal transmitters for nociceptive pain and itch
Sensory modality Peripheral receptors Primary afferent fibers
Nociceptive heat Nociceptive cold Nociceptive mechanical Itch Visceral pain
TRPV1, TRPV2-4, TRPM8, TRPA1, TRAAK/TREK-1 ASIC1-3; Cav3,2; P2X3, TRAAK H1,4; interlukin-31 receptors; PAR2 ASIC1-3; TRPV1; TRPV4
Aδ; C fibers Aδ; C fibers Aδ; C fibers C fibers Visceral afferent fibers
38 Chronic Pain: New Molecular Insights into Pain and Treatment
https://t.me/medicina_free
Molecular biology of sensory receptors
Identification of heat receptor TRPV1 has greatly facilitated the discovery of many other sensory receptors [3]. Research into the expression of these genes in cell lines has provided the first direct evidence of their sensitivity to sensory stimuli. Development of selective inhibitors and gene knockout mice have further helped us to understand the physiological studies of these sensory receptors, although some of the results are complicated and different from the expectation (e.g., cold receptor knockout and mouse behavioral responses to cold). At the cellular level, the thermal threshold of TRPV1 is found to be similar to that of human thermal threshold for heat pain. In addition to the heat, TRPV1 is also activated by capsaicin and acids (protons). Knockout mice lacking the TRPV1 receptors not only avoid water with capsaicin in it but also have a diminished response to heat, providing strong evidence for its roles in sensory process in behav­ioral animals [4].
In addition to TRPV1, there are other types of heat receptors in the skin. They are all transmembrane proteins in the plasma membrane that are permeable to calcium ions and sodium ions when they are open. Between them, they cover a range of temperatures: TRPV4 Warm (~27–34°C), TRPV3 Warmer (~31–39°C), and TRPV2 Painfully hot (>52°C). Since the discovery of TRPVs, there has been a great interest in developing drugs that inhibit these proteins. The hypothesis is that by applying these receptor blockers, we may reduce the pain in patients with chronic pain. While it is true that some thermal hyperalgesia may be reduced, these inhibitors will also reduce normal thermal sensation in normal skin areas and thus may cause secondary damage in daily life due to the changed threshold.
Cold-sensitive thermoreceptors give rise to the sensations of cooling, cold, and freshness [5–7]. There are two candidate receptors for this: One, designated TRPM8, is a channel that admits Ca2+ and Na+ in response to moderate cold (<26°C) or menthol (the ingredient that gives mint its “cool” touch and taste). However, knockout mice lacking the gene encod­ing the TRPM8 receptor do not avoid cold places as normal mice do, sug­gesting that its function can be compensated by other sensory proteins in vivo. A second candidate, designated TRPA1, responds to lower tempera­tures (<18°C). It also responds to several irritant chemicals eliciting
Peripheral Nociceptors and Sensitization 39
https://t.me/medicina_free
signals that the brain interprets as pain. However, TRPA1 knockout mice respond normally to cold so the precise role of these receptors is still uncertain for those stimuli.
Recent physiological studies using gene knockout mice lacking TRPV1 or TRPM8 have nicely demonstrated that neither heat pain nor cold pain is mediated by a single protein/an ion channel. In mice lacking TRPV1, behavioral deficits in responses to noxious heat applying to the tail or hind paw are only partial. In mice lacking TRPM8, behavioral responses to noxious cold are partially affected or not affected at all. In some subpopulation of nociceptors, other ion channels such as voltage­gated K+ channel may also contribute to cold responses. Thus, it is pos­sible that a peripheral sensory protein may contribute to multiple sensory processes, such as heat, cold, itch, and touch. One common concern is that many reports only employed behavioral studies using gene-manipulated mice. Therefore, most of the conclusions are indirect and inconclusive. Electrophysiological experiments may be very difficult in some cases and are needed in future studies (Figure 2).
While the roles of TRPM8/TRPA1 in behavioral responses to physi­ological cold are inconclusive, recent studies found that they may contrib­ute to cold stimuli after tissue inflammation or cold allodynia [8–12]. It is great of interest to confirm these findings at the cellular level (using elec­trophysiological recordings of fiber activity) and investigate the possible molecular mechanisms. Mechanical nociceptors respond to excess pres­sure or mechanical deformation. They also respond to incisions that break the skin’s surface. The reaction to the stimulus is processed as pain by the cortex, just like chemical and thermal responses. Many times, these mechanical nociceptors have polymodal characteristics. Therefore, it is possible that some of the transducers for thermal stimuli are the same for mechanical stimuli. The same is true for chemical stimuli since TRPA1 appears to detect both mechanical and chemical changes.
Visceral nociceptors
Visceral receptors are less studied as compared with somatosensory noci­ceptors [13]. Recent studies from visceral nociceptors clearly show that it is unlikely that there is a common mechanism for nociceptors in
40 Chronic Pain: New Molecular Insights into Pain and Treatment
https://t.me/medicina_free
Figure 2. Molecular identity of thermosensitive afferents based upon the expression of TRPM8 and TRPA1. TRPM8 and TRPA1 are found in distinct and non-overlapping popu­lations of sensory afferents, with TRPA1 expressed exclusively in some, but not all, neu­rons that express the heat-gated channel TRPV1. These thermosensitive TRP channels respond to a number of naturally occurring pungent compounds, such as menthol (mint), allyl isothiocyanate (mustard oil), cinnamaldehyde (cinnamon), and capsaicin (‘hot’ chili peppers), thus providing a molecular explanation for how these compounds provide dis­tinct sensations of cold, heat, or spiciness. Based upon in vitro characterizations of these channels, along with their distinct expression patterns, thermal stimuli activating TRPM8­expressing afferents elicit the sensation of cool to potentially noxious cold, while TRPA1 afferents will merge both noxious cold and noxious heat, due to the expression of TRPV1 (adapted from McKemy [8]).
cutaneous tissues vs visceral organs. For example, some of the visceral nociceptors have large cell bodies of DRG as compared with typical somatic nociceptors. Unlike somatic nociceptors, visceral nociceptors are low-threshold mechanoceptors suggesting that they also respond to non­nociceptive stimuli. Recent studies reveal that different subtypes of ATP receptors are important for transducting visceral pain information [14,15].
Peripheral Nociceptors and Sensitization 41
https://t.me/medicina_free
Itching and pain: Two separate transmitter systems?
Research on itch has gained more interest recently. Similar to pain, one major theory is that itch may be mediated by selective, independent ‘itch’ transmitters and receptors, at least at the periphery [16,17]. The studies of mice lacking gastrin-releasing peptide (GRP) provide interesting findings that show selective reduction in ‘itch’ responses, while most of the pain responses remain intact. Considering the expression of GRP in selective DRG cells, it has been proposed that GRP may act as selective transmitter for itch. However, there is one key piece of evidence missing to support the theory of GRP as the neurotransmitter in the spinal cord for itch. It is essential to demonstrate that sensory-evoked responses between primary afferent fibers and GRP-responsive dorsal horn neurons are mediated by GRP itself. Without this direct evidence, it is impossible to distinguish GRP as a transmitter or neuromodulator for itch. The hypothesis of GRP as a selective itch transmitter is also questioned by recent studies using gene-mutant mice lacking VGLUT2 or BHLHB5 [18]. In the study of BHLHB5 mutant mice, loss of inhibitory interneurons in the spinal dorsal horn contributes to elevated itch responses in behavioral animals. In VGLUT2 conditional null mice — in which vesicle glutamate transport type 2-dependent synaptic release of glutamate was abolished — behav­ioral responses to itch stimuli were either significantly reduced or enhanced. Electrophysiological studies showed that while GRP activated certain dorsal horn neurons that received C fiber inputs, excitatory synap­tic responses onto the same neurons are purely mediated by glutamatergic receptors, suggesting that glutamate is also the major transmitter for itch­ing at the level of the spinal cord [19] (Figure 3). These conflicting results raise new questions about whether GRP serves as a selective transmitter of itch or GRP and/or glutamate may serve as transmitters in spinal itch synapses (Figure 4).
Peripheral sensitization
It is well known that nociceptor neuron sensitivity is modulated by a large variety of mediators in the extracellular space [20,21]. Peripheral sensiti­zation represents a form of functional plasticity of the nociceptor. The nociceptor can simply change from a noxious stimulus detector to a
42 Chronic Pain: New Molecular Insights into Pain and Treatment
(A)
(B)
https://t.me/medicina_free
(a)
(b) (c) (d)
(e)
Figure 3. C fiber-evoked responses in GRP-positive neurons are blocked by glutamate antagonists. (A) The experimental procedure to identify the transmitter between C fibers and GRP-positive neurons in rats. (B) In a GRP-sensitive neuron (a), a monosynaptic C fiber-evoked EPSCs (b) was totally blocked by a bath application of CNQX (25 µM), an AMPA/KA receptor antagonist (c–e, n = 4) (adapted from Koga et al. [19]).
Peripheral Nociceptors and Sensitization 43
https://t.me/medicina_free
Figure 4. Itching and pain pathways. Under normal physiological conditions, noxious stimuli activate nociceptive afferent fibers (Aδ and C fibers). Incoming action potentials trigger a release of excitatory transmitter glutamate in the spinal dorsal horn. In addition, some neuropeptides are also released including substance P (SP) and neurokinin A (NKA). Glutamate and neuropeptides activate spinal dorsal horn neurons, including those that send projection terminals to supraspinal structures. Neurons in the thalamus play key roles in relaying these ascending inputs. Five major cortical areas, the ACC, IC, S1, S2, and PFC, are activated and contribute to different aspects of pain perception, including the unpleas­antness of pain. Recent studies have suggested that glutamate may also serve as a key fast excitatory transmitter for itch, and a peptide GRP plays modulatory role in the transmis­sion of itch.
44 Chronic Pain: New Molecular Insights into Pain and Treatment
https://t.me/medicina_free
detector of non-noxious stimuli. The result is that low-intensity stimulus from regular activity initiates a painful sensation. This is commonly known as hyperalgesia and allodynia. Inflammation is one common cause that results in the sensitization of nociceptors. Normally, hyperalgesia ceases when inflammation goes down, however, sometimes genetic defects and/or repeated injury can result in allodynia: where a completely non-noxious stimulus like light touch causes extreme pain. It becomes clear that no simple factor is involved in peripheral sensitization. Instead, different factors and cells are involved. It is believed that peripheral sen­sitization may contribute to behavioral hyperalgesia and/or allodynia in chronic pain state. It is unlikely that there is one universal mechanism for all kinds of peripheral sensitization.
cAMP as a key messenger for peripheral sensitization
cAMP is a key second messenger for cellular signaling process. cAMP is generated by the activation of adenylyl cyclases (ACs), and there are at least 11 different isoforms of ACs in neuronal cells. These different iso­forms of ACs allow the coupling of different receptors/ion channels to the production of cAMP in postsynaptic cells. For example, subtypes AC1 and AC8 link activation of NMDA receptors to the cAMP production in an activity-dependent manner in central synapses. The activation of NMDA receptors leads to an increase in postsynaptic calcium, then that calcium binds to calmodulin and activates AC1 and AC8 which both are regulated by calcium calmodulin. At the peripheral, non-selective activators of ACs — forskolin as well as cAMP analogs — trigger peripheral nocicep­tor sensitization (i.e., causing behavioral hyperalgesia or allodynia). At least one major mechanism is enhancing responses of primary afferent fibers to sensory stimuli. Interestingly, opioid receptor agonists produced their analgesic effects at least in part by reducing the intracellular cAMP level by different types of G protein-related signaling pathways.
In addition to cAMP and PKA pathways, another major protein kinase PKC has also been found to be important for peripheral sensitization. Interestingly, among different isoforms of PKCs, only calcium-independ­ent PKCε is mainly involved in peripheral sensitization. It can be activated
Peripheral Nociceptors and Sensitization 45
https://t.me/medicina_free
by different types of inflammation-related mediators, such as bradykinin, epinephrine, tumor necrosis factor, and carrageen.
Sensitization of TRPV1 receptor
Among many different possible target proteins that may be sensitized or enhanced in peripheral sensitization, the modulation of TRPV1 receptor function is an attractive target (Figure 5) [22,23]. Due to its important role in processing thermal heat transmission, it is obvious that its sensitization will significantly enhance the responses of nociceptors to thermal stimuli and contribute to thermal hyperalgesia. It may also contribute to thermal allodynia if the responsive threshold is also reduced. The cAMP-PKA pathway that is known to be critical for peripheral sensitization has been reported to enhance the function of TRPV1 receptors in nociceptors [24]. Capsaicin responses in nociceptors are enhanced by the activation of PKA. One possible major mechanism is that PKA phosphorylates TRPV1 at Ser 116, and this phosphorylation reduces the desensitization of TRPV1.
Figure 5. Plasticity of TRPVR1 receptors. The capsaicin receptor, TRPVR1, is a sensory neuron-specific ion channel that serves as a polymodal detector of pain-producing chemi­cal and physical stimuli. ATP potentiates the TRPVR1 currents evoked by capsaicin through metabotropic P2Y1 receptors in a protein kinase C (PKC)-dependent pathway.