Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_4473_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
42 Мб
Скачать
33 Genetic Background oftheRhinologic Diseases
https://t.me/medicina_free
449
33.5.11 Allergic Fungal Sinusitis (AFS)
Sometimes, mold living commensally in the sinuses can cause activation of innate immune pathways and synergistically evoke robust TH2 lymphocyte and eosinophilic inammatory responses. Initially, AFS was only attributed to Aspergillus species, but it is now known that many fungi species can be associated with AFS, including Cladosporium, Alternaria, Penicillium, Curvularia, and Bipolaris [84]. The key feature of AFS is specic IgE sensitization, which is dem­onstrated by skin prick tests or serum immunoas­says and measurement of increased total serum IgE concentrations. AFS generally develops in young, immunocompetent, and atopic subjects [54]. AFS has some features that distinguish it from other forms of eosinophilic sinusitis, such as its often being unilateral and limited to one or a few sinuses. Dense material lls and expands the sinuses and can typically be detected with CT scan [85]. The mucous and inammatory responses frequently occupy a space in the nasal cavity and lead to expansion into proximate tis­sue. This blocks the sinus ostia and subsequently causes bone absorption with resultant expansion into the orbits and cranium [86].
33.5.12 Genetics ofAFS
There is only one study that shows a genetic link­age with AFS.In a study of 74 subjects including 44 enrolled with AFS, a weakly signicant asso­ciation of disease was determined with the MHC class II allele HLA-DQB1*03 [87], however, many subjects from the control group had at least one fungal species in the skin prick test.
Caucasians. There are approximately 80,000 children and young adults with CF in the world. Genetic and nongenetic factors contributing to the disease and its variants have been widely investigated. Though the major gene responsible for the pathophysiology of CF is the cystic bro­sis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene, recent research suggests that varia­tions in other so-called modier genes have an important inuence on phenotypic differences in this disease. In recent years, multiple candidate modier genes have been investigated, in particu­lar, genes that are involved in the control of infec­tion, immunity, and inammation [88].
33.6.2 Rationale forCystic Fibrosis
Subjects with CF typically present with the dis­ease in the lungs, sweat gland, pancreas, intestine (which is especially important during the new­born period), liver, and male reproductive tract [89]. CFTR controls chloride across the apical membranes of polarized epithelia [90]. Disruption in CFTR function inhibits the transport of sodium, chloride and water across epithelial tis­sues and so it causes insufcient hydration of mucous secretions in CF patients. Certain organs are eventually damaged from/by a blockage in the luminal space and follow recurrent cycles of inammation and brosis [89, 91]. Many CF patients suffer from intestinal malabsorption and an abnormal nutritional status due to obstruction of the exocrine pancreas. The major cause of death in CF patients is complications arising from obstructive lung disease, a condition that occurs in approximately 90% of patients [92].
33.6 Genetics ofCystic Fibrosis andPathophysiology inAirways
33.6.1 Introduction
Cystic brosis (CF) is the most common lethal autosomal recessive genetic disorder, with a rate of approximately 1 in 2500 live births among
33.6.3 Genetics andCF
Lung function measurements are notably differ­ent among CF patients with identical CFTR gen­otypes (e.g., F508del homozygotes) [93]. In fact, an analysis of almost 88,000 patients in the CFTR2 database showed a low correlation between CFTR mutations and FEV1. There are only a few mutations that cause a milder pancre-
450
https://t.me/medicina_free
M. Gunduz et al.
atic phenotype (e.g., p. Arg455Glu) [94, 95]. In aggregate, these studies show that factors other than the CFTR genotype affect the progression of airway obstruction in CF.
Recurrence of complications in affected sib­lings at rates higher than in unrelated patients indicates a genetic effect, but care must be taken to account for the effect of a similar environment for siblings. A more powerful approach is to compare monozygous (MZ) and dizygous (DZ) twin pairs for concordance for qualitative traits and correlation for quantitative traits. When MZ pairs show a stronger correlation than DZ pairs for a clinical feature, it shows that genetic factors may be responsible [96].
A higher correlation between composite mea­sures of lung function and body mass index (BMI) was observed in 29 MZ versus 12 DZ twin pairs. This was the rst twin-based assessment of the contribution of gene modiers to CF disease sever­ity and suggested genetic control of this trait [97]. Analysis of lung function and weight for height as independent measures did not show signicant dif­ferences between the MZ and DZ twin pairs. Another comparison of 38 MZ pairs with six same-sex DZ pairs and 61 same-sex sibling pairs under 3years of age demonstrated the heritability of lung function based on FEV1 measurements ranging from 0.54 to 1.0 [98]. Variance analysis of 231 pairs of affected siblings showed an insigni­cantly higher estimate of heritability for the FEV1 measures (0.68–1.0) [98]. In aggregate, these stud­ies show that genetic modiers have an essential role in determining FEV1, a key measure of lung function, which is correlated with survival.
Collaco etal. recruited 134 MZ twins and 272 DZ twins and siblings when living together and after moving apart to estimate the relative effect of genetic and environmental factors on FEV1 among CF patients. Differences in lung function between MZ twin pairs while living together in the same house supplied an estimate of the effect of unique environmental and stochastic contribu­tions. Changing the home environment to inde­pendent living was used to assess the effect of a shared environment. The effect of genetic factors was estimated by comparing the similarities in lung function measures in MZ and DZ twin pairs
when living together and subsequently when liv­ing apart. These methods showed that genetic and nongenetic factors had approximately equal effects on lung function. Analysis of 58 MZ twins and 568 DZ twins and siblings showed similar estimates for the genetic and nongenetic contri­butions to lung function variance [99].
33.6.4 Modier Genes inCF
Two independent studies with more than 500 patients combined showed that more than nine genes can be involved in modifying some fea­tures of the CF phenotype. Several recent studies provide detailed lists of all the CF-related/modi­er genes that have been studied thus far [99,
100]. These studies demonstrated the role of vari-
ous modier genes such as MBL2, EDNRA, and
TGF-β1 in lung function; MBL2 in age at rst P. aeruginosa infection; MSRA in meconium ileus; TCF7L2 in CF-related diabetes; SERPINA1 in
CF-related liver disease.
Three studies in CF patients showed an earlier age of infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Pa) to be related to mannose-binding lectin (MBL) deciency genotypes. Lung disease sever­ity, which is measured by FEV1 and infection sta­tus, is correlated with and two of them are changed by the age of the patient and by CFTR genotype. In aggregate, MBL2 genotype was found to be related to infection status more than the other vari­ables [101]. Hence, decits in MBL causes/can cause a predisposition to early infection with Pa, which leads to more severe lung disease than that observed in patients of the same age and CFTR genotype but who do not have MBL deciency.
The Genetic Modier Study (GMS), one of the largest CF genetic modier studies to date, analyzed 808 F508del homozygotes drawn from the extremes of lung function (highest 30 percen­tile and lowest 30 percentile) and reported that alleles in the promoter (509) and rst exon (codon 10) of TGF-b1 are correlated with worse lung function [102]. This nding was studied in 498 patients with different CFTR genotypes and was separately conrmed when a haplotype com­posed of the opposite alleles at 509 and codon
33 Genetic Background oftheRhinologic Diseases
https://t.me/medicina_free
451
10 was correlated with improved lung function [103]. Six studies including over 2500 CF patients determined a relationship between TGFb1 and CF lung function (see Table 33.1) while one study including 118 patients did not [104] and another involving 171 patients [105] found a relation between worse lung function and the opposite alleles than those reported by Drumm etal. and Bremer etal. [102, 103].
Three SNPs in the highest ranking gene, the interferon-related developmental regulator 1 gene (IFRD1), were identied in the whole GMS sam­ple and showed a relationship using transmission­based methods in the family-based CF Twin and Sibling Study (TSS) [98]. IFRD1 acts via tran­scriptional mechanisms to alter neutrophil func­tion in response to bacterial infection, as demonstrated by cell- and mouse-based studies.
It was demonstrated that variants in the inter­leukin- 8 (IL-8) gene correlated with lung func­tion. This result supported the idea that modication of CF lung disease may be caused by an altered neutrophil response to infection [106].
There are other mechanisms, which seem­ingly contribute to CF lung pathology as dem­onstrated by evidence that variants in the endothelin receptor type A (EDNRA) gene cor­relate with lung disease severity. Correlation between a variant in the 3 untranslated region of EDNRA was identied in 709 F508del homo­zygous patients in the GMS study and replicated in three independent samples of CF patients. Also, alleles of the EDNRA variant are associ­ated with differences in RNA transcript level, which indicates a possible functional role. Given that variation of EDNRA has been impli­cated in vasoconstrictive diseases as a result of effects on smooth muscle function, it was hypothesized that this gene may modulate CF lung disease by changing smooth muscle tone in the airways and vascular system [107].
appearing as recurrent sinusitis, rhinitis, and/or nasal polyposis [108, 109]. The frontal sinuses seldom develop in these patients, perhaps because of the early occurring/earlier occurring disorder of sinusitis which hinders pneumatization [110]. Sinusitis onset and nasal polyposis commonly occur between 5 and 14years of age, with adult onset being unusual.
Most patients with CF (over 90%) [111, 112] develop chronic and recurring rhinosinusitis with or without nasal polyps. Modied mucus compo­sition and viscoelasticity cause decreased muco­ciliary clearance and blockage in paranasal sinus drainage ostia, thereby promoting local inam­mation, hypoxia and increased carbon dioxide partial pressure. Mucosal edema generally devel­ops after impaired ciliary function and bacterial colonization, usually by Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa [113, 114].
Franco etal. reported a relation between naso­sinusal symptoms and cystic brosis. They found (the?) most common symptoms like cough (45%), oral breathing (44%), sleep disorders (42%), and nasal obstruction (37%) in CF patients. Twenty­eight patients (28%) had purulent nasal discharge and 41% had medial bulging of the nasal lateral Wall [115]. It is reported that nasosinusal involve­ment may worsen pulmonary disorder [116]. Hence, otorhinolaryngologists should investigate these patients in more detail for signs of pulmo­nary diseases. A recent study in Brazil [117] dem­onstrated more attention to the nasosinusal ndings of CF patients, because CF is genetically very heterogeneous, with many types of mutations and a wide diversity in clinical presentations [118].
ΔF508 homozygosity was found more fre­quently in the patients undergoing sinus surgery (58%) compared with a control population (48%) [119]. Lastly, a study reported that ΔF508 homo­zygosity was associated with clinical severity of paranasal sinus diseases and with the presence of polyps on endoscopy in 113 patients [120].
33.6.5 Cystic Fibrosis andNasal Findings
Clinical manifestations in the upper airways (UAW) occur in almost 100% of CF patients,
33.6.6 CF andNasal Polyposis
Nasal polyposis in CF patients was rst described almost 50 years ago [121] but there is a little
452
https://t.me/medicina_free
M. Gunduz et al.
known about its pathophysiology [122]. The prevalence of nasal polyposis varies by popula­tion [117]. The incidence of nasal polyps has been observed in 6–48% of cases [123] depend­ing on cystic brosis was diagnosed. Nearly 4% of patients already have symptomatic nasal pol­yposis when their diagnosis of CF is established and it is expected that nearly 14% of patients will undergo surgical intervention for their nasal polyp disease [113].
Weber et al. showed that nasal polyps were estimated in 39.1% of CF patients and, interest­ingly, all of them were older than 6years of age, presenting with recurrent pneumonia in 82.6%, pancreatic insufciency in 87%, and malnutrition in 74%. No correlation was seen between nasal polyps and sweat chlorine concentration, geno­type, clinical signs of severity, and nasal symp­toms. Nasal polyps regressed in seven patients treated with topical steroids, while six patients showed complete resolution [124].
Some researchers reported that patients with nasal polyposis had better pulmonary function, however a higher rate of Pseudomonas aerugi­nosa colonization, more hospitalizations, and more prevalence of allergy to Aspergillus fumig­atus than the comparison group. They found no statistically different genotype distribution between the group with polyposis and the control group. But they also emphasized that the preva­lence of the compound heterozygous genotype is higher within the nasal polyposis group than within controls [113].
33.7 Role ofGenetics inNasal
Polyposis
33.7.1 Introduction
tides, cytokines, and growth factors. These molecules lead to an extensive network of cellu­lar interactions. In addition, resident structural cells can synthesize many of these molecules. Fibroblasts, epithelial cells, and endothelial cells help to organize the inammatory process in nasal polyps [126].
Recently, it has been shown that there are pro­inammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and interleukin-1b (IL-1b) in the epithelial and endothelial cells of nasal pol­yps. Also, cell adhesion molecules such as very late antigen-4 (VLA-4) have been found on the surface of eosinophils, while integrins such as vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1) have been shown on the surface of the small venules of the nasal polyp. Lastly, the presence of chemokines such as regulated upon activation of normal T cell expressed and secreted (RANTES), eotaxin, and IL-8in the epithelium of the nasal polyps has been determined.
The nasal polyp tissue and the nasal mucosa have a sufcient collection of inammatory mol­ecules to combat efciently against different agents such as allergens, bacteria, fungi, chemi­cal particles, and viruses that come into the nose from the external environment. One of the most signicant cells to offer an immune response may be the lymphocyte subpopulations. The percent­ages of TH1 lymphocytes (which produce IL-2 and interferon-α [INF- α]) and TH2 lymphocytes (which produce IL-4 and IL-5 cytokines) in the nasal pharyngeal tonsillar lymphocytes and peripheral blood lymphocytes have been deter­mined in patients with nasal polyposis [127]. These same researchers have described the lym­phocyte subpopulations and cytokines in nasal polyps [128].
The nasal polyp is one of the nal manifestations of chronic inammation. Nasal polyposis is a chronic inammatory disorder of the upper respiratory tract that 1–4% of the human popula­tion suffers from [125]. The lamina propria of nasal polyps usually presents great numbers of eosinophils and lymphocytes. In chronic inam­mation, inammatory cells produce neuropep-
33.7.2 Mucosal Irritation
andtheRole ofStaphylococcal Exotoxin
As the nasal polyp symbolizes a nal point in chronic inammation, it is difcult to describe the initial events that trigger the inammatory process in the lateral wall of the nose. Some
33 Genetic Background oftheRhinologic Diseases
https://t.me/medicina_free
453
substances, such as allergens, bacteria, viruses, air pollutants, and fungal elements, enter the sub­mucosa of the lateral wall of the nose and dam­age the airway epithelium. These irritants lead to changes in some of the possible modications of the respiratory epithelium that may take place after the entrance of these particles. These changes include the following: rst, the synthesis of inammatory eicosanoids, which are potent cell activators and chemoattractants; second, pro­inammatory cytokines such as TNF-α and IL-1, which have major effects on growth, differentia­tion, migration, and activation of inammatory cells; and, third, specic cell adhesion molecules, which have an essential role in managing the inammatory cell. Lastly, major histocompatibil­ity class II antigens have a crucial role in antigen presentation to T cells [129] and are also respon­sible for consequent activation of T cells. Figure33.2 shows the possible changes in respi­ratory epithelium after the entrance of bacteria, viruses, allergens, and fungal elements.
Various cytokine subtypes are produced by the
stimulation of epithelial cells by these elements.
Shortly after exposure, activation of specic inammatory cells occurs. Hence, the early growth of nasal polyposis may be the effect of stimulation of the epithelium by allowing irri­tants to change or damage the surface epithelium metabolically or physically. A cascade of inam­matory alterations takes place after this surface epithelium is damaged (Fig.33.2).
A superantigen concept for massive nasal pol­yposis has been postulated. S. aureus is the most common bacterial species found in the nasal mucus. It has been shown in different studies that these bacteria synthesize exotoxins and that the corresponding variable-β region of the T cell receptor is also upregulated in polyp lympho­cytes [130]. Based on these results, it is postu­lated that toxin-producing Staphylococci cause preliminary damage to the lateral wall of the nose. These exotoxins can act as superantigens, which lead to the proliferation of lymphocytes, which in turn synthesize cytokines that are asso­ciated with the massive proliferation of inam­matory cells that are observed in massive nasal polyposis.
Fig. 33.2 Schematic presentation of epithelial damage in nasal polyp
454
https://t.me/medicina_free
M. Gunduz et al.
33.7.3 Proinammatory Cytokines Produced inNasal Polyps
TNF-α and IL-1β cytokines play a role in the second process involved in the development of nasal polyposis after the initial mucosal irrita­tion. The basic function of these two cytokines in the upregulation of endothelial adhesion mole­cules implicated in inammatory reactions. TNF-α and IL-1β increase the production of endothelial adhesion molecules such as intracel­lular cell adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) and VCAM-1. It has lately been shown by invitro studies and animal experiments that certain adhesion molecules are important for adherence of eosinophils to endothelium and their subse­quent extravasations.
Eotaxin and RANTES, which are cysteine/ cysteine chemokines, attract and stimulate eosin­ophils invitro and direct eosinophils into inam­matory lesions. There is strong evidence supporting the hypothesis that cytokines released from activated CD4 T cells mostly account for the restricted accumulation and activation of eosinophils in allergy-related disorders. It has been reported that these T cells produce some cytokines such as IL-4 and IL-13, which are also known as TH2 cytokines. These cytokines play a role in favored extravasations of eosinophils through selective stimulation of VCAM-1 and IL-5. Also, granulocyte-macrophage colony­stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and IL-3 are essen­tial for eosinophil activation and survival [131]. However, many studies propose that TH1 cells are the main cells in nasal polyps and their release of INF-γ and IL-2 are highly present in nasal pol­yps. Thus, the recruitment of eosinophils may be linked to both TH1 and TH2 cytokines [132].
The specic localization of the eosinophil onto the vascular endothelial surface of the nasal polyp occurs due to the interaction of VLA-4 on eosinophils and VCAM-1 on venule endothelial cells. Eosinophil migration occurs within the nasal polyp venules after blood ow slowing down, and the subsequent transepithelial migra­tion of these eosinophilic cells into the lamina propria of the nasal polyp occurs via the inu-
ence of chemokines such as RANTES and eotaxin. One study suggests that the eosinophil is the main cell in the nasal polyp, where eosino­phils constitute up to 80% of the inammatory cells [133].
Lymphocytes are enormously widespread cells accompanied by eosinophils found in the lamina propria of the nasal polyp. It is believed that protracted survival of these cells occurs via the autocrine upregulation of cytokines within the lamina propria of the nasal polyp. For instance, at least three cytokines (IL-3, GM-CSF, IL-5) are shown to decrease the apoptosis of eosinophils [134]. They have an impact on the long-term survival of eosinophils and their acti­vation. Among these, IL-5 appears to have the most powerful effect in increasing the survival of eosinophils in the nasal polyp. Also, it was deter­mined that the eosinophil itself can react by pro­ducing similar cytokines in an autocrine upregulation pattern. This vicious cycle of auto­crine upregulation increases the recruitment of more eosinophils into the nasal polyp so that the chronic inammatory state of eosinophils is extended.
33.7.4 Eosinophils
andElectrophysiology ofRespiratory Surface Epithelium
Airway mucus secretion is stimulated by eosino­philic cationic protein and inhibited by eosino­philic major basic protein (MBP) [135]. Just over a decade ago, Jacoby and colleagues (1988) showed that MBP increased net chloride secre­tion [136]. Also, MBP signicantly facilitates sodium ux into the epithelial cell. Although there was a large change of chloride in and out of the cell, the net ux of chloride was not clearly determined. Finally, the short-circuit current seemed to be increased signicantly with MBP compared with the control group.
One of the potential new strategies for the management of nasal polyps is based on the effect of amiloride and other sodium channel
33 Genetic Background oftheRhinologic Diseases
https://t.me/medicina_free
455
blocking agents (such as furosemide) on water movement into and out of nasal mucosa. Amiloride notably reduced sodium absorption and the short-circuit current. Hence, amiloride or furosemide may be useful as topical agents that could reduce sodium absorption into the cell and thereby reduce cellular and subcellular edema. It is approved by the ndings from the bioelectric studies suggesting that nasal polyp epithelial cells have a normal luminal chloride channel which was controlled by increased chloride permeability after isoproterenol admin­istration. Amiloride caused a larger decrement in sodium absorption in nasal polyp cells than in cells from the inferior turbinate mucosa. Amiloride is a specic blocker of the apical sodium channel and reduces the basal voltage and basal short-circuit current. These results show that sodium absorption may be increased in nasal polyps.
The mediators such as MBP produced by inammatory cells of nasal polyps may increase sodium absorption, which could cause water retention in the epithelium of the lamina propria of polyps. The efcacy of corticosteroid treat­ment for nasal polyps depends on the inhibition of the synthesis of multiple cytokines. Decreased expression of the CFTR protein in remodeled human nasal epithelium from non-CF patients was demonstrated [137]. In normal adult pseu­dostratied human nasal surface epithelium, the CFTR is localized to the apical domain of the ciliated cells, whereas in CF, the mutated DF 508 CFTR gene causes an abnormal cytoplasmic location of the CFTR protein. Airway epithelial damage, in CF or non-CF patients, may induce a remodeling of the surface epithelium character­ized by a change in the morphologic structure from normal columnar pseudostratied to basal hyperplasia, mucus cell hyperplasia, or squa­mous metaplasia. These histological ndings are found in human polyp epithelium in the non-CF patient. Thus, abnormally low expression of the CFTR protein not only may be caused by the CFTR gene mutation in CF but also may be asso­ciated with airway surface epithelial differentia­tion and remodeling as occurring in nasal polyps from non-CF patients.
33.7.5 Medical Treatment ofChronic Rhinosinusitis withMassive Nasal Polyposis Based ontheMolecular Biology ofInammation
Patients with CRS and massive nasal polyposis typically have eosinophilic and lymphocytic inltration in the lateral wall of the nose. In the phases of inammation, there is a complex inter­action between cytokine molecules. It gives rise to increased numbers and survival of eosinophils and lymphocytes in the nose. Hence, a rational approach to the medical treatment of this chronic inammatory disorder can be properly achieved only after a complete understanding of the cyto­kine network (Table33.3).
The major pathologic aspect of CRS with and without nasal polyposis is chronic inammation. Hence, the application of specic anti­inammatory drugs such as corticosteroids, which are the most commonly utilized drugs in the treatment of CRS, particularly with nasal pol­yposis, is useful. Antileukotriene therapy has also been found useful in the management of nasal polyposis. This drug may be especially effective in the aspirin-sensitive patient who has CRS with nasal polyposis.
Erythromycin and clarithromycin have promi­nent effects against neutrophils and some inam­matory cytokines, and interest in the potential anti-inammatory effects of macrolide antibiot­ics has increased in the last 50years. However, there are many reports of increasing bacterial resistance to macrolides for many signicant spe­cies that specically cause upper respiratory tract infection.
Microorganisms can stick on various surfaces and shape a three-dimensional constitution known as biolm. After a biolm has been formed on the mucosal surface, the bacteria har-
Table 33.3 Inammation changes in different CRS subtype
CRS with NP CRS without NP TGF-β1 T
reg
Edema TH2 + TH2
TGF-β1↑↑↑↑ T
↑↑↑↑
reg
Fibrosis TH1
456
https://t.me/medicina_free
bored in the biolm are less exposed to the immune response and less vulnerable to antibiot­ics. One study mentions that the use of furose­mide and amiloride was found to be valuable in the postoperative treatment of CRS with nasal polyposis [138].
Anti-IgE therapy is a compelling new thera­peutic molecule for the neutralization of IgE and the inhibition of IgE synthesis [139]. Monoclonal anti-IgE therapy may be a logical approach in the treatment of chronic hyperplastic sinusitis when allergy is a major factor in a patient with IgE­mediated hypersensitivity.
33.8 Vasomotor Rhinitis andIts
Genetic Background
M. Gunduz et al.
Fig. 33.3 Possible mechanism of VMR
33.8.1 Introduction
Rhinitis is an inammation of the nasal area and generally characterized by rhinorrhea, nasal con­gestion, sneezing, and/or nasal itching [140]. It is classied into subtypes of allergic, nonallergic, occupational, hormonal (pregnancy and hypothy­roidism), drug induced, and food ingestion induced [141]. Vasomotor rhinitis (VMR) is the most common type of chronic nonallergic rhinitis (NAR). Millions of people suffer from vasomotor rhinitis and it causes uncomfortable symptom­atology. VMR is an idiopathic condition diag­nosed after exclusion of infection, allergy, eosinophilia, hormonal changes (such as preg­nancy), and exposure to drugs. Hence, sometimes scientists have described it as a “wastebasket diagnosis” [142, 143].
Certain odors, alcohol, spicy foods, emotions, and environmental factors such as temperature, barometric pressure changes, and bright lights exacerbate these symptoms [144] (Fig. 33.3). Allergic and nonallergic rhinitis have notably overlapping symptoms, but the causes appear to be entirely different [144].
Skin testing or invitro tests for allergen- specic IgE are usually used for allergic rhinitis (AR) or VMR diagnosis. Also, a patient may have both allergic and nonallergic components and this is named “mixed rhinitis.” These patients must be
recognized properly because positive testing for a specic allergen may cause the clinician to ignore the role and management of non- allergic factors.
33.8.2 Epidemiology
Approximately 19 million people suffer from NAR in the United States and a further 26 million experience mixed rhinitis.
33.8.3 Pathophysiology ofVMR
Several hypotheses have been suggested for the pathophysiology of VMR.
33.8.3.1 Trauma
Surgical and nonsurgical trauma has been accounted to cause VMR as a long-term complication.
33.8.3.2 Autonomic Dysfunction
Patients with vasomotor rhinitis are clinically sep­arated into two subgroups: “runners,” who present “wet” rhinorrhea, and “dry” patients, who show nasal obstruction and airow resistance with mini­mal rhinorrhea. Many researchers have endeav­ored to explain the pathogenic mechanisms for these subgroups. An imbalance in the autonomic
33 Genetic Background oftheRhinologic Diseases
https://t.me/medicina_free
457
input to the nasal mucosa has been held responsi­ble for VMR since the 1950s. Recent theories pos­tulate that increased cholinergic glandular secretory activity is responsible for runners, while nociceptive neurons with increased sensitivity to generally innocent stimuli are responsible for dry patients. Recent studies have suggested that VMR is due to a hypoactive sympathetic nervous system rather than a hyperactive parasympathetic system [145]. There are some factors that trigger symp­toms of VMR such as changes in temperature or humidity, smoke, alcohol, odors, perfumes, sexual arousal, and emotional factors [143]. A study determined nasal hyperreactivity to cold air using anterior rhinomanometry [146]. Numata et al. determined nasal hyperreactivity to histamine using acoustic rhinometry [147].
33.8.3.3 Cytokines andVMR
Chen etal. showed that there were no signicant differences in levels of IL-10, IL-13, or IL-16 between vasomotor rhinitis and normal controls. But the level of IL-12in vasomotor rhinitis was lower than that of normal controls. Further research is needed on the role of IL-12in vaso­motor rhinitis [148].
33.8.3.4 Light andElectron
Microscopic Findings
Giannessi etal. recently studied microscopic and ultrastructural alterations in the nasal mucosa of VMR patients [149]. VMR patients who under­went inferior turbinate reduction showed abnor­mal epithelium in 80–90% of the nasal surface with light microscopy. They observed decreases in epithelial thickness and loss of ciliated and goblet cells on the nasal surface. Also, ultrastruc­tural studies supported light microscopic nd­ings. They detected ciliary loss, lack of tight junctions, loss of vibratile cilia, loss of goblet cells and ciliated cells, and a marked expansion of the intercellular spaces.
VMR.Stimulation of nasal sensory nerves caused sensations of pain and stufness. Type C nocicep­tive nerves synthesize some neuropeptides such as substance P (SP) and calcitonin gene- related peptides, and it increased plasma extravasation and glandular secretion. Groneberg et al. [151] studied the neuropeptide content of mucosal para­sympathetic, sympathetic, and sensory nerves of patients with toxic rhinitis caused by chronic cig­arette smoke exposure. They measured concen­trations of calcitonin gene-related peptides, SP, vasoactive intestinal peptide, and neuropeptide tyrosine (NPY) and determined signicantly increased concentrations of vasoactive intestinal peptide and NPY in the nasal mucosa of toxic rhinitis compared with normal subjects. Also, the level of SP expression was increased. SP is gen­erally distributed in nerve bers near submucosal glands and blood vessels, whereas NPY is found near submucosal blood vessels. SP has many functions in the body such as increasing plasma extravasation, glandular secretion vasodilatation, and mucociliary clearance. Vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) is a neurotransmitter that has a role in the inhibitory noncholinergic airway nervous system and it always dilates bronchus and vascu­lature. Increased levels of VIP may lead to hyper­secretion. Groneberg etal. (2003) postulated that a separate subclass of nerves might be responsible for the pathophysiology of toxic rhinitis and that major changes in the content of mucosal nerves occur in toxic rhinitis [151].
Schierhorn et al. (2002) investigated ozone­induced releases of SP and neurokinin A, and ozone stimulation was found to increase SP and neurokinin A levels [152]. Also, it was reported that the ozone-induced increase in neuropeptides in allergic patients was higher as compared with nonallergic patients. Ozone might increase sen­sory nerve activity in the upper airways and as a result increase neuropeptide release in the upper airways.
33.8.3.5 Neuropeptides
Some scientists have investigated the neurogenic and molecular mechanisms of VMR. Tai and Baraniuk [150] suggest that sensory nerve end­ings and autonomic dysfunction have a role in
33.8.3.6 Nitric Oxide
The function of nitric oxide (NO) in the patho­genesis of VMR was studied by Giannessi etal. (2003) and by Ruffoli etal. (2000) [149, 153]. Three isoforms of NOS have been shown in the
458
https://t.me/medicina_free
M. Gunduz et al.
human nasal mucosa. Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) is used by all isoforms of NOS as a cofactor. Hence, NADPH­diaphorase histochemistry is used to investigate NOS in tissues. The damaged epithelium con­taining cells with marked reactivity to NADPH­diaphorase was found in the nasal respiratory epithelium in VMR by Giannessi et al. [149]. Basal cells in VMR presented strong NADPH­diaphorase activity, while NOS activity was neg­ative in basal cells of normal subjects.
NO is known to have cytostatic and cytotoxic effects against microbes and cancer cells. Inducible NOS stimulation could synthesize a high degree of NO, and it could cause decreased viability of normal tissue and necrosis. High­level NOS expression in the nasal epithelium could lead to a constant high level of NO and result in constant epithelial damage. This has been postulated as one of the possible pathogen­eses of VMR.Repression of mucociliary clear­ance decreased the number of tight junctions, and disruption in the basement membrane continu­ities might permit environmental agents to inter­act directly with the subepithelial structures. Consequently, symptomatic VMR is caused by increased responsiveness to the afferent trigemi­nal bers, and recruitment of secretory and vas­cular reexes could occur in the nasal respiratory mucosa.
Cervin et al. (1999) studied the functional effects of NPY receptors on blood ow and NO concentrations in the human nose by using dose­dependent effects of the intranasal application of NPY [154]. They showed that application of NPY leads to vasoconstriction and a decrease in NO levels. Braat etal. (2002) showed that pollu­tion and meteorologic factors are linked with the severity of symptoms in VMR patients [155]. They determined that minimum daily tempera­ture and the levels of ozone and NO had the high­est association with the severity of symptoms.
33.8.3.7 Nasal Secretory Proteins
The protein analysis of nasal washes to differenti­ate VMR from other forms of rhinitis was studied by Iguchi et al. (2002) and Tosun et al. (2002) [156, 157]. Iguchi etal. (2002) investigated con-
trol, VMR, and perennial AR subjects [156]. The total protein and albumin level in AR was higher than the total protein and albumin level in NAR (P<0.01 for both). It is shown that the difference in total protein and albumin concentration between normal control subjects and NAR was also statisti­cally signicant (P<0.05 for both). The control subjects had the lowest total protein and albumin levels in their nasal lavage. They also found a pro­tein with a molecular weight of 26kDa. The iden­tity of this protein has not been determined yet, but it is believed to derive from the nasal glands since its secretion can be provoked in normal volunteers with pilocarpine nasal spray. The average level of this protein was signicantly higher in AR subjects compared with control subjects (P < 0.01) and NAR subjects (P<0.05). The level of the 26-kDa protein in NAR was higher than in control subjects but it was not statistically signicant. It is sug­gested that increased vascular permeability led to increased albumin concentration in nasal dis­charge. The level of the 26-kDa protein is there­fore enhanced due to increased gland secretion. In the NAR group, vascular permeability may have been increased over control subjects, but gland secretion was minimal, and the 26-kDa protein level remained low. Hence, the presence of the 26-kDa protein can be used to distinguish AR from NAR.
The gel electrophoretic assessments of pro­teins in nasal washings of patients with AR and VMR were studied [157]. The average total level of proteins, 66-kDa proteins, and 26-kDa pro­teins was determined to be higher in AR com­pared with those from VMR.The lowest rate of these proteins was seen in the control group. The differences in the mean concentration of proteins in AR, VMR, and control groups were statisti­cally signicant (P<0.05).
Aust etal. (1997) studied the gene expression of eight types of mucin in control and vasomotor inferior turbinates, and the only difference observed between normal and VMR turbinates was a minor decrease in mucin 1, transmembrane (MUC 1) gene expression in the vasomotor group [158]. They suggested whether this decrease could begin abnormal neurogenic signals that lead to an increase in nasal secretions in VMR.