Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_4458_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
47 Мб
Скачать
Malignant Tumours
https://t.me/medicina_free
PaoloBattaglia, GiorgioSileo, andPaoloCastelnuovo
32
Introduction
Sinonasal malignancies are rare tumours, accounting for 0.2–0.8% of all malignancies and 3–5% of head and neck cancers. Their prognosis is extremely variable, being inuenced by the local extension of the disease, possible involve­ment of noble structures such as brain, orbit or internal carotid artery and tumour histology, itself critically inuencing the biological aggres­siveness [1].
The management of these uncommon diseases is handled by a multidisciplinary oncologic skull base team composed of head and neck surgeons, neurosurgeons, radiologists, radiotherapists, medical oncologists and pathologists.
P. Battaglia (*) · P. Castelnuovo Division of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, , University of Insubria-Varese, ASST Sette Laghi, Ospedale di Circolo e Fondazione Macchi, Varese, Italy
Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, Head and Neck Surgery and Forensic Dissection Research Center (HNS and FDRc), University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
G. Sileo Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, Head and Neck Surgery and Forensic Dissection Research Center (HNS and FDRc), University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
The spectrum of treatment strategies is wide, from various surgical approaches to multimodal management, and is driven by the tumour histo­type and its extension.
Craniofacial resection, rstly described by Ketcham in 1964 [2], has represented the gold standard in the treatment of sinonasal malignant tumours for decades, even though it is burdened by invasive transfacial approaches, signicant functional sequelae and a complication and mor­tality rate of 36.3% and 4.7%, respectively [3].
The endoscopic endonasal approach, which was initially developed in the 1970s for the treat­ment of inammatory sinonasal conditions, fol­lowing progressive renements in surgical techniques and technologies, has been gradually
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023 A. C. Swift et al. (eds.), Contemporary Rhinology: Science and Practice,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28690-2_32
415
416
https://t.me/medicina_free
P. Battaglia et al.
applied to selected cases of sinonasal malignan­cies since 1990 [4], with results comparable to those ones of traditional external approaches.
Epidemiology
In Western countries the incidence varies between
0.8 and 1 per 100,000 people, whereas it is greater in Africa and Eastern countries, where it can reach
2.6 per 100,000 people as reported in Japan [5]. The average age at diagnosis is 60years; men
are more affected than females (58.6%), which is probably due to environmental or occupational exposure. Children can be affected by different histotypes, rhabdomyosarcoma being the most prevalent type [6].
The most common site of origin is the maxil-
lary sinus (50–70%), followed by the nasal cavity (15–30%) and ethmoid sinus (10–20%); frontal and sphenoid sinuses are rarely the primary site, yet they are generally involved by locally advanced tumours with dismal prognosis.
The role of different work-related chemical
hazards in determining sinonasal cancers has been widely investigated by epidemiological studies, and the evaluation of the occupational exposure can be very challenging, because of the potential long latency period.
Workers exposed to wood dust, leather, alumin-
ium and other chemicals (such as formaldehyde and solvents) have an increased risk for develop­ing sinonasal malignancies. The strong association between intestinal-type adenocarcinoma (ITAC) and former exposure to wood or leather dust, as demonstrated by Bonzini et al. (87% of patients with ITAC were exposed), is noteworthy [7].
In addition to occupational hazards, other risk
factors include previous head and neck irradia­tion, smoking, genetic alterations and inverted papilloma.
Two thirds of sinonasal malignancies have an
epithelial origin and the most common histologies are adenocarcinoma (ADC) in European coun­tries and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) in North America; other epithelial histotypes include ade­noid cystic carcinoma (ACC) and sinonasal undif­ferentiated carcinoma (SNUC) [8].
Paranasal sinuses may be the site of metasta­ses from other cancers and almost half of all cases is represented by renal cellular carcinoma, followed by breast, prostate, lungs, gastrointesti­nal tract and thyroid carcinoma [9].
Clinical Features
Sinonasal malignancies commonly present with non-specic signs and symptoms, therefore mak­ing the diagnosis difcult and generally delayed. Initial ndings can often be misleading because they may mimic more common and benign con­ditions such as inammatory diseases.
In our institution, among 565 patients treated in the last 20years, the most common complaints were respiratory nasal obstruction (71%), epi­staxis (51%), olfactory dysfunction (36%), rhi­norrhoea (29%), headache (17%), facial pain (13%), epiphora (6%), swelling (4%), visual dis­turbance (4%) and diplopia (4%).
Symptoms may be an indicator of the local extension of the disease because of the mass effect on surrounding tissues.
Maxillary tumours may present with facial swelling, if extending anteriorly, or palatal swelling and loosening of teeth, in cases with inferior extension; diplopia and proptosis may be the result of orbital invasion, whereas a pos­terior spread, towards the infratemporal/ptery­goid palatine fossa, may cause trismus or facial neuralgia or occasionally altered sensation/ numbness because of the involvement of masti­catory muscles or maxillary nerve. Ethmoidal malignancies may extend laterally into the orbit, thus causing visual symptoms or proptosis, or intracranially with potential neurological symp­toms (Fig.32.1).
Among this broad spectrum of clinical nd­ings, unilateral persistent symptoms unrespon­sive to medical treatment must draw clinicians’ attention and should prompt a thorough further investigation.
On initial presentation cervical lymph node metastases occur within a range variable from 3 to 30%, whereas distant metastases are less fre­quent, with an incidence of 1–7% [10].
bc
32 Malignant Tumours
https://t.me/medicina_free
a
417
Fig. 32.1 Potential directions of growth of ethmoidal (yellow star) and maxillary (red star) tumours in different CT scan views ((a), coronal; (b) axial at the level of max­illary sinuses; (c) axial at the level of the orbits). Legend: 1 orbital inltration; 2 nasal cavity extension; 3 ante rior/
Diagnostic Workup
In cases of suspected sinonasal expansile lesions, the patient must be referred to an otolaryngologist for a complete clinical examination.
Nasal endoscopy, performed with exible or rigid scopes, is the rst diagnostic test of utmost importance since it can detect the lesion, its char­acteristics (e.g. ulceration, bleeding) and its pos­sible site of origin.
CT Imaging
The second step is computed tomography (CT) imaging, generally done without contrast, to evaluate the sinonasal anatomy and the presence of bony alterations, which can present with dif­ferent patterns:
Bone remodelling, that is displacement and
thinning of bony structures (more frequently
observed in benign neoplasms or chronic
inammatory processes)
Cortical destruction, that is interruption in the
whole thickness of mineralized bone
Intra-diploic growth, in cases of intra-osseous
spread, that is the replacement of spongiosa
by solid tissue
Permeative invasion, that is subperiosteal
spread with diffuse demineralization (mostly
lateral maxillary wall inltration; 4 contralateral nasal cavity extension; 5 intracranial invasion; 6 exten sion into the oral cavity; 7 posterior extension into the pterygopala­tine or infratemporal fossa
observed in lymphomas and adenoid cystic carcinomas)
Sclerosis, as a result of chronic inammatory reaction of the spongiosa [11]
The CT scan facilitates the evaluation of the
lamina papyracea and skull base, thus providing preliminary details of intraorbital and intracranial extension. Moreover, the enlargement of bony s­sures or foramina may be an indicator of perineural spread. Lastly, modern CT scans with three-dimen­sional reconstruction in axial, coronal and sagittal planes are crucial in surgical planning.
MRI Imaging
The third step consists of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan with contrast (gadolinium), which has the potential to differentiate soft tissue densities and to assess the grade of vasculariza­tion. MRI of the head is strongly recommended on occasions where a CT head scan demonstrates unexpected unilateral sinonasal mass in patients with no sinonasal symptoms.
A systematic approach to different MRI
sequences is crucial in characterizing the lesion and in evaluating its relationship with adjacent structures. For this purpose, it is useful to com­pare T2 with plain T1 and contrast-enhanced T1 sequences: The rst shows uid as bright, the sec­ond highlights fat as bright, whereas the latter enhances vascularized neoformations, which are
418
https://t.me/medicina_free
P. Battaglia et al.
usually hypointense on T2. “Fat-sat” (applicable to both T1 and T2) is another useful sequence that suppresses fat signal, hence helping in delineating the relationship between tumour and fat tissue.
The usefulness of MRI is demonstrated by its ability to assess eventual inltration of the orbit, anterior cranial fossa and pterygopalatine/infra­temporal fossa, which dramatically inuences the treatment planning.
Orbital walls appear hypointense on T1 and T2 sequences because of the reduced water con­tent of lamina papyracea and periorbita; thus, neoplastic inltration is suspected when the hypointense interface is not recognizable.
T2 and contrast-enhanced T1 sequences enable evaluation of different stages of anterior cranial fossa invasion, by looking at its three dif­ferent layers (cribriform plate, dura and cerebro­spinal uid); indeed, a thickened and enhanced dura suggests skull base invasion.
Posterior extension to the pterygopalatine and infratemporal fossa is demonstrated by maxillary bone erosion, loss of fat signal or altered signal intensity of the pterygoid muscles [12].
However, it is important to appreciate that in almost all cases CT and MRI ndings are non­specic and do not allow to differentiate between different malignant histotypes.
As a general rule, biopsy is best performed after completing imaging studies to minimize the risk of bleeding from vascular tumours (e.g. juve­nile angiobroma, meningoencephalocele). Biopsy is generally performed under local anaes­thesia with rigid scopes, but in some cases, gen­eral anaesthesia is required.
A pathological second opinion in centres with dedicated expertise is strongly recommended in order to conrm the denitive diagnosis and plan the adequate treatment.
Additional Scanning Protocols
Once a malignant tumour has been conrmed, it is essential to exclude or identify regional and/or
distant metastatic disease, according to the policy of the local radiology department. This typically includes ultrasound neck and CT chest and abdomen.
Total body positron emission tomography (PET-CT) scan is preferred in cases of aggressive histotypes (e.g. mucosal melanoma, neuroendo­crine carcinoma) or advanced stages.
Staging
Different staging systems have been developed in the past decades to evaluate sinonasal malignancies.
The Union for International Cancer Control/ American Joint Committee on Cancer (UICC/ AJCC) TNM classication, now in its eighth edi­tion, is the most widely used. In this staging sys­tem, the T classication depends on the progressive involvement of adjacent structures; the sinonasal tract is divided into maxillary sinus and nasal cav­ity/ethmoid sinus. All histotypes are included except for mucosal melanoma, which has its own TNM classication (T3 is the minimum) due to its extremely aggressive behaviour [13].
Different staging systems have been proposed for esthesioneuroblastoma, because of its pecu­liar biological behaviour: The Kadish classica­tion, which was developed in 1976, is the most commonly used and divides patients into three categories [14]; a fourth new category, for patients with metastases, was introduced by Morita in 1993. In 1992 Dulguerov and Calcaterra developed a new staging system, which was found to be better correlated with sur­vival [15].
The Wang staging system was developed for carcinoma of the nasal vestibule, which is an aggressive cancer with a worse prognosis than other head and neck skin cancers; this staging system is based on the invasion depth and is a better prognostic indicator than the TNM classi­cation [16] (Tables 32.1, 32.2, 32.3, 32.4 and
32.5).
32 Malignant Tumours
https://t.me/medicina_free
Table 32.1 T staging according to the AJCC eighth edition
Maxillary sinus Nasal cavity and ethmoid sinus
T1 Tumour limited to the mucosa (no
erosion or destruction of the bone)
T2 Tumour causing bone erosion or
destruction (hard palate and/or middle meatus extension is included, whereas extension to posterior maxillary wall and pterygoid plates is excluded)
T3 Tumour involves any of the following:
• Posterior maxillary bony wall
• Floor or medial orbital wall
• Subcutaneous tissues
• Pterygoid fossa
• Ethmoid sinuses
T4a Tumour involves any of the following:
• Anterior orbital contents
• Skin of the cheek
• Pterygoid plates
• Sphenoid or frontal sinuses
• Cribriform plate
• Infratemporal fossa
T4b Tumour involves any of the following:
• Orbital apex
• Dura
• Brain
• Middle cranial fossa
• Cranial nerves other than V2
• Nasopharynx or clivus
a
Anatomical site and subsites: nasal cavity (septum, oor, lateral wall, vestibule), maxillary sinus, ethmoid sinus (left, right)
Tumour restricted to one subsitea of the nasal cavity or ethmoid sinus
Tumour involves two subsites in a single site or involves an adjacent sites within the nasoethmoidal complex
Tumour involves any of the following:
• Maxillary sinus
• Floor or medial orbital wall
• Palate
• Cribriform plate Tumour involves any of the
following:
• Anterior orbital contents
• Skin of the nose or cheek
• Pterygoid plates
• Sphenoid or frontal sinuses
• Minimal extension to anterior cranial fossa
Tumour involves any of the following:
• Orbital apex
• Dura
• Brain
• Middle cranial fossa
• Cranial nerves other than V2
• Nasopharynx or clivus
419
Table 32.2 N staging according to the AJCC eighth edition
Regional lymph nodes
Nx Regional lymph nodes cannot be assessed N0 No regional lymph nodes metastases N1
N2a Metastasis in a single ipsilateral lymph node, between 3 and 6cm in greatest dimension (no extranodal
N2b
N2c
N3a Metastasis in a lymph node >6cm in greatest dimension (no extranodal extension) N3b Metastasis in a single (>3cm) or multiple lymph nodes with extranodal extension
Metastasis in a single ipsilateral lymph node, 3cm in greatest dimension (no extranodal extension)
extension) or<3cm with extranodal extension
Metastasis in multiple ipsilateral lymph nodes, 6cm in greatest dimension (no extranodal extension)
Metastasis in bilateral or contralateral lymph nodes, 6cm in greatest dimension (no extranodal extension)
420
https://t.me/medicina_free
Table 32.3 T staging of malignant melanoma of upper airways and digestive tract according to AJCC eighth edition
Malignant melanoma of upper airways and digestive tract
T3 Tumour is limited to the epithelium and/or submucosa T4a Tumour involves the bone, cartilage, deep soft tissue or overlying skin T4b Tumour involves any of the following:
• Brain
• Dura
• Skull base
• Lower cranial nerves (IX, X, XI, XII)
• Masticator space
• Carotid artery
• Prevertebral space
• Mediastinal structures
Table 32.4 Kadish-Morita and Dulguerov-Calcaterra staging system for esthesioneuroblastoma
Kadish-Morita Dulguerov-Calcaterra
A Tumour is limited to the nasal
cavity
B Tumour involves the nasal
cavity and paranasal sinuses
C Tumour extends beyond the
nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses
D Regional or distant metastases T4 Tumour involves the brain
T1 Tumour involves the nasal cavity and/or
paranasal sinuses (excluding sphenoid), sparing the most superior ethmoidal cells
T2 Tumour involves the nasal cavity and/or
paranasal sinuses (including the sphenoid), with extension to or erosion of cribriform plate
T3 Tumour extends into the orbit or protrudes into
the anterior cranial fossa, without dura invasion
P. Battaglia et al.
Table 32.5 Wang T staging system for carcinoma of the nasal vestibule
Wang T staging system
T1 Tumour conned to the skin T2 Tumour invades subcutaneous tissue and
cartilage
T3 Tumour invades the bone
Histology-Driven Treatments
In this section the most common histotypes and their multimodal treatment protocols are presented.
Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC)
SCC is the most common sinonasal malig­nancy in the United States: It originates in the
maxillary sinus in 60% of cases, less frequently in the nasal cavity or ethmoid. Tumours occur in men twice as much as in women in their 50s and 60s.
It can present with different subtypes: keratin­izing (KSCC), non-keratinizing (NKSCC) and other rarer variants.
KSCC is the most common (50% of cases) and is characterized by keratinization; indeed epithelial markers (e.g. citokeratins) are expressed. It is identical to KSCC arising in other sites and it can be found in approximately 5–10% of sinonasal inverted papillomas [17].
NKSCC accounts for 20% of sinonasal SCC and is similar to that one arising in the oropharynx. It is characterized by minimal squamous differ­entiation and does not have tumour grading. The association with high-risk HPV is found in almost 50% of cases and correlates with a trend towards improved survival [18].
bc
32 Malignant Tumours
https://t.me/medicina_free
421
The standard treatment is surgical resection followed by adjuvant radiotherapy; irradiation should include the neck in case of advanced stages (T3–T4), given the high risk of nodal metastases (20%). In case of positive margins or evidence of neural/lymphovascular inltration, adjuvant chemotherapy can be administered.
Patients with high-grade carcinoma in advanced stages (T3–T4) can be treated with induction chemotherapy regimens followed by surgery and postoperative chemoradiation or denitive chemoradiation; tumour response to induction chemotherapy is associated with better survival and prognosis [19] (Fig.32.2).
a
de f
Fig. 32.2 A 54-year-old female affected by right maxil­lary sinus squamous cell carcinoma G2 extending into the infratemporal fossa, parotid, temporalis muscle and sub­cutaneous cheek (T4aN0M0). Preoperative CT (a) and MRI scans ((b) T2W; (c) T1W with contrast) in coronal views. The patient underwent craniofacial resection with right selective neck dissection (I–IV), reconstruction with
anterolateral thigh free ap and adjuvant radiotherapy (60Gy). MRI scans in coronal views ((d) T2W; (e) T1W with contrast) and nasal endoscopy (f) at 1-year follow­ up: the patient is alive without disease. Legend: Alt anterolateral thigh free ap, Ion infraorbital nerve, Np nasopharynx, Ns nasal septum, Ss sphenoid sinus, T tumour, black arrows erosion of the lateral maxillary wall
422
bc
https://t.me/medicina_free
P. Battaglia et al.
Adenocarcinoma (ADC)
ADC is the most common sinonasal epithelial malignancy in Europe and it generally originates in the ethmoid (85%), followed by the olfactory cleft (13%).
Intestinal-type adenocarcinoma (ITAC) takes its name from the morphological analogy with intestinal adenocarcinomas and correlates with occupational exposure to leather or wood dust in up to 87% of cases [7]. It affects predominantly men aged between 40 and 70years.
According to Barnes’s classication, different subtypes can be distinguished: papillary (75% of cases), solid, mucinous (e.g. signet-ring cells) and mixed. Solid and mucinous patterns are indicative of poorly differentiated cancers, thus behaving more aggressively [20].
a
Non-intestinal-type adenocarcinoma (nITAC) represents a diagnosis of exclusion; features of intestinal or salivary gland tumours are absent; positive for markers of seromucinous differentia­tion (e.g. S100, DOG1) are often demonstrated. As opposed to ITAC, it is not correlated with occupational exposure and patients are generally younger (50s) with a mild female predilection.
Surgical resection is the mainstay of treatment: It is the single effective treatment for low- grade tumours in early stages (T1–T2), but it should be followed by postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) in case of high-grade neoplasms, advanced stages (T3–T4) or inltrated surgical margins. In case of high-grade lesions with intracranial extension, a prophylactic brain irradiation should also be con­sidered, given the potential risk of leptomeningeal involvement [21] (Fig. 32.3).
def
Fig. 32.3 A 78-year-old male, former woodworker, affected by right sinonasal intestinal-type adenocarci­noma G1 (T3N0M0). Preoperative MRI scans in coronal views ((a) T2W; (b) T1W with contrast). Right endo­scopic resection with transnasal craniectomy (ERTC) and skull base reconstruction with fascia lata and septal ip ap was performed ((c) right nasal fossa intraoperative
view after dura removal), adjuvant radiotherapy followed (66Gy). MRI scans in coronal views ((d) T2W; (e) T1W with contrast) and nasal endoscopy (f) after 5years dem­onstrate no evidence of the disease. Legend: B brain, D dura mater, Fs frontal sinus, Lp lamina papyracea, Ns nasal septum, Sff and white arrowheads septal ip ap, Ss sphenoid sinus, T tumour
32 Malignant Tumours
https://t.me/medicina_free
423
The neck is not routinely treated as regional metastases occur in only 7% of patients. Induction chemotherapy has been proposed for advanced- stage (T3–T4) ITAC with functional p53, showing promising results in survival [22].
Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma (ACC)
ACC is a rare salivary gland tumour that involves most frequently the maxillary sinus (60%) and the nasal cavity (30%). It has a slight prevalence in women, with a peak of incidence in the fth and sixth decades.
Given the strong propensity for perineural and bony spread, intracranial extension (includ­ing cavernous sinus) is likely and local recur­rence is common (60%). Another important characteristic is distant metastases (lung, bone and brain), often presenting many years after the initial tumour and occurring in approximately 40% of patients [23].
ACC presents in different subtypes: cribri­form, tubular and the less differentiated solid. Different grading systems have been proposed to emphasize the importance of histological sub­types; indeed, according to the Perzin/Szanto system, ACC is classied as high grade if the solid component represents more than 30%. In this case the tumour behaves locally more aggressively and tends to develop early distant metastases [24].
ACC is considered a relative radiosensitive tumour; hence the standard treatment is surgical radical resection, whenever feasible, followed by adjuvant radiotherapy to clear positive margins (microscopic or macroscopic) [25].
In cases of locally advanced stages, with involvement of vital structures, function-sparing tumour debulking reduces the target volume, making PORT more selective and efcient.
Heavy particle radiotherapy, with protons or carbon ions, has recently been introduced and demonstrates improved local control, both for postoperative patients and those with unresect­able ACC. A signicant advantage of this tech­nique is the ability to deliver high tumouricidal doses whilst sparing adjacent normal tissues.
Esthesioneuroblastoma (ENB)
ENB, also named olfactory neuroblastoma, is a malignant neuroectodermal neoplasm that arises from the olfactory neuro-epithelium. It has a slight predominance in male (male-to-female ratio 1.2:1), and although a bimodal distribution in age has been initially reported, it affects patients in the fth or sixth decade [26].
It is typically located in the superior portion of the nasal vault and involves the cribriform plate. Ectopic location within the paranasal sinuses is extremely rare. It can present with a paraneoplas­tic syndrome but only in 2% of patients (e.g. syn­drome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone/ ADH secretion) [27].
Metastases at presentation are rare; further­more they develop late in the natural history of the disease, most frequently in cervical lymph nodes. Several staging systems have been pro­posed, but the Kadish staging system is the most commonly applied.
The Hyams grading system classies ENB into four grades, from most (grade I) to least dif­ferentiated (grade IV), depending on specic his­topathological features. Higher grades are associated with more aggressive locoregional disease and worse disease-free survival.
The differential diagnosis is wide, and immu­nohistochemistry is of utmost importance: neuron- specic enolase, synaptophysin and chromogranin A are typically positive. Review of pathological specimens by expert pathologists is crucial especially when dealing with poorly differentiated ENBs, given that they could easily be confused with other neuroendocrine tumours.
The standard treatment is surgical resection, with removal of the anterior skull base dura and olfactory bulb, followed by adjuvant radiother­apy; irradiation should include the neck in cases of intracranial extension (Kadish C).
The role of chemotherapy is debated; however neoadjuvant regimens (e.g. etoposide/cisplatin) are generally advocated for patients with poorly differentiated ENB in locally advanced stages [28]. Follow-up should be long term, and should metastatic neck disease present at a late stage, neck dissection with possible PORT should be considered (Fig.32.4).
424
bc
https://t.me/medicina_free
a
de f
P. Battaglia et al.
Fig. 32.4 A 58-year-old male affected by right esthesio­neuroblastoma Kadish C, Hyams II. The preoperative MRI scans in coronal views ((a) T1W with contrast; (b) T2W) and intraoperative view (c) show the intracranial extension of the disease. The patient underwent bilateral ERTC and skull base reconstruction with fascia lata fol­lowed by adjuvant radiotherapy (60/54Gy on T/N). MRI
Neuroendocrine Carcinoma (NEC)
Sinonasal tumours with neuroendocrine differen­tiation is a heterogeneous group of rare neo­plasms with neuroectodermal (ENB) or epithelial origin (NEC).
NEC is a high-grade carcinoma with features of neuroendocrine differentiation that accounts for 5% of sinonasal malignancies; it is an aggres­sive tumour characterized by a dismal prognosis with a high rate of local recurrences and distant metastases (lung, liver and bones). It can be cat­egorized into typical and atypical carcinoids and small cell and large cell NECs.
It has a slight male predominance and a median age at diagnosis of 56 years. The most common site of origin is the ethmoid (64%), fol­lowed by the nasal cavity (32%) and the maxil­lary sinus (14%) [29].
scans in coronal views ((d) T1W with contrast; (e) T2W) and nasal endoscopy (f) performed at 7-month follow-up demonstrate local control of the disease. Legend: B brain,
D dura mater, D3 Draf III, Lp lamina papyracea, Sbr and white arrowheads skull base reconstruction, Ti intradural
tumour, Te extradural tumour
NECs are strongly positive for cytokeratins, epithelial membrane antigen and markers of neu­roendocrine differentiation (e.g. synaptophysin); according to a European multicentre study, CK8/18 immunohistochemistry is strongly rec­ommended in order to avoid a misdiagnosis of ENB, due to the negative staining for CKAE1/A3 [28].
Mixed neuroendocrine-nonneuroendocrine neoplasm is a recently described histopathologi­cal entity, in which the neuroendocrine compo­nent represents at least 30% of the lesion, characterized by an aggressive biological behav­iour with frequent recurrences (80%) and poor survival outcomes [30].
The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy is still debated but promising, due to the frequent distant failures and the chemosensitivity of NEC; the rate of response to induction chemo-