Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_754_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
48 Мб
Скачать
332
M.Y. Nahabedian
Fig. 31.13 ( a ) Intraoperative photograph demonstrating the midline bulge of the linea alba. ( b ) Intraoperative photo- graph following plication of the midline and lateral fascia
Fig. 31.14 ( a ) Intraoperative lateral photograph demonstrating the degree of abdominal protrusion prior to repair. ( b ) Intraoperative lateral photograph demonstrating the degree of abdominal protrusion following the repair
into the supra aponeurotic space and creating a dissection plane under direct vision exposing the linea alba and the anterior rectus sheath. The repair includes sheath plication and reinforce-
placement of an intraperitoneal mesh can be con­sidered instead of onlay mesh placement. Huguier has applied this technique in 15 women with good­to-excellent results in 13/15 (87%) [
18 ].
ment with a synthetic mesh. A nonabsorbable barbed suture is typically used. A drain is placed and a soft-compression garment is applied.
Complications
Laparoscopic reinforcement of the anterior abdominal wall can be considered in some patients. In patients that have had plication of the attenuated linea alba and anterior rectus sheath, laparoscopic
Complications following rectus diastasis repair are infrequent and include infection, mesh extrusion, recurrence, nerve injury, seroma,
31 Diagnosis and Management of Diastasis Recti
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
333
Fig. 31.15 Intraoperative photograph following place­ment of the non-resorbable mesh over the plicated anterior rectus sheath
Fig. 31.17 Intraoperative photograph following comple­tion of the abdominoplasty
Fig. 31.16 Intraoperative photograph of the redundant skin and fat constituting the abdominoplasty
complex scar, skin necrosis, contour abnormal­ity, and visceral injury (bladder, bowel). As with most operations, caution must be exer­cised when considering this procedure in women who are active smokers, because delayed healing and tissue necrosis are more common in this population of patients [ 17 ].
Emanuelsson has performed a randomized controlled trial comparing outcomes and compli­cations in women with rectus diastasis managed
Fig. 31.18 Six-month postoperative anterior view fol­lowing successful diastasis repair and abdominoplasty
with layered closure of the anterior rectus sheath or retrorectus placement of synthetic mesh [ 19 ]. Superfi cial wound infectio n occurred in 14/57 (24.5%) of which 5/57 (8.8%) were in the suture repair cohort and 9/57 (15.8%) were in the retro­rectus mesh cohort. Postoperative pain was assessed using a visual analog scale demonstrat­ing an improved reduction in pain in the retrorec­tus cohort (6.9) compared to the sheath plication cohort (4.8).
334
M.Y. Nahabedian
Fig. 31.19 Six-month postoperative lateral view
Fig. 31.20 Suture plication of the posterior rectus sheath
Outcomes
Sheath Plication
The outcomes following sheath plication for dias­tasis recti have been mixed and primarily related to the type of suture used for the plication.
Al-Quattan in a review of 20 women following vertical sheath plication alone using an absorbable suture demonstrated 100% recurrence after 1 year [ 20 ]. Reasons included a repair that was localized to the defect only, a repair that addressed only the horizontal component of the diastasis, and suture­related fraying of the anterior rectus sheath due to its fragile nature. Nahas using a nonabsorbable suture had positive outcomes utilizing a 2-layer plication repair [ 5 ]. Effi cacy of the repair was evaluated by postoperative CT scans in 12 women at 3 weeks, 6 months, and again at a mean of 81 months postoperatively. The inter-rectus distance was measured 3 cm above and below the umbili­cus. They demonstrated no recurrence of diastasis recti in any patient at all levels studied. Mestak performed a case-controlled study comparing 51 women that had diastasis recti repair via plication with an interlocking continuous absorbable suture (0-PDS) to 10 nulliparous women without a dias­tasis [ 4 ]. Postoperative assessment was performed via physical examination and ultrasound in all women at 12–41 months following the repair. Ultrasound measurements were obtained at the midpoint of the umbilicus and xiphoid, at the umbilicus, and at the midpoint of the umbilicus and the pubis. The mean inter-recti distance was essentially equal between the two cohorts. The authors advocated absorbable sutures because suture palpability is not a long-term issue.
The type and orientation of suture material used for diastasis repairs has also been compara­tively studied. Nahas has compared diastasis repair techniques using absorbable (0- polydiaxone) sutures to nonabsorbable (2-0 nylon) sutures. CT scans obtains at 3 weeks and 6 months demonstrated no signifi cant difference between the two suture techniques [ 16 ]. Ishida, in a cadaveric study, compared horizontal versus vertical suture repair. A dynamometer was used to determine th e amount of force required to dis­rupt the suture repair [ 21 ]. There was signifi - cantly higher difference in the strength required for rupture for the vertical suture placement, thus vertical orientation was recommended.
31 Diagnosis and Management of Diastasis Recti
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
335
Retrorectus Repair
Outcomes following the retrorectus repair have been demonstrated to be effective. Batchvarova et al. have utilized this technique in 52 women with up to 11 years of follow-up [ 17 ]. They con- tend that posterior plication alone may not be suf­fi cient in all cases and for that reason have decided to place a vicryl mesh into the retrorectus space. The benefi t of the mesh in that location was to redistribute the forces placed on the posterior sheath repair, reducing the risk of recur­rence. According to Batchvarova, a resorbable mesh such as vicryl is preferred because it effec­tively relieves fascial tension, is resorbed by 6 weeks, is placed in an extraperitoneal position, and does not increase the incidence of complications.
In the Emanuelsson study, SF-36 outcomes were compared following repair via anterior sheath plication versus retrorectus mesh place­ment [ 19 ]. The results demonstrated improve- ment in both cohorts following the repair with no technique demonstrating superiority over the other. Subjective improvement in muscle strength was improved more in the retrorectus cohort compared to the suture cohort (6.9 vs. 4.5, Likert scale, 0–10, p = 0.01).
Endoscopic/Laparoscopic
The most frequent adverse event with the endoscopic technique is seroma (23%) [ 10 ]. In the 21 patients from the Luque study, there were no hernia or diastasis recurrences at 20-month follow- up [ 10 ]. The mean inter-rec- tus distance was significantly improved 1 month following the procedure with preopera­tive measurements ranging from 24 to 39 mm and postoperative measurements ranging from
2.1 to 2.8 mm. One- and 2-year follow-up did not change from the 1-month measurements (2.5–3.7 mm). Patient satisfaction was assessed on a visual analog scale and graded with a mean score of 8.7.
Summary
The etiology, diagnosis, and management of diastasis recti is now well understood and has demonstrated success in management. Multiparous women are at highest risk for devel­oping diastasis recti. Diagnosis is easily made by clinical examination and symptomatology. Management options vary and will depend on the degree of separation between the rectus abdomi­nis muscles. Simple plication has been effective for mild-to-moderate diastasis. The use of resorb­able or non-resorbable mesh placed as an onlay or in the retrorectus space has been effective for moderate-to-severe diastasis.
References
1. Azer H, et al. Collagen fi bers in linea alba and rectus sheath. J Surg Res. 2001;96:127–34.
2. Liaw LJ, Hsu MJ, Liao CF, Liu MF, Hsu AT. The relationships between inter-recti distance measured by ultrasound imaging and abdominal muscle func­tion in postpartum women: a 6-month follow-up study. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2011;41(6): 435–43.
3. Brauman D. Diastasis recti: clinical anatomy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;122:1564.
4. Mestak O, Kullac R, Mestak J, et al. Evaluation of the long-term stability of sheath plication using absorb­able sutures in 51 patients with diastasis of the recti muscles: an ultrasonographic study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;130:714e.
5. Nahas FX, Ferreira LM, Augusto SM, Ghelfond C. Long-term follow-Up of correction of rectus dias­tasis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;115:1736.
6. Elkhatib H, Buddhavarapu RS, Henna H, Kassen W. Abdominal musculoaponeuretic system: magnetic resonance imaging evaluation before and after vertical plication of rectus muscle diastasis in conjunction with lipoabdominoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128:733e.
7. Nahas FX. An aesthetic classifi cation of the abdomen based on the myoaponeurotic layer. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;108:1787–95.
8. Rath AM, Attali P, Dumas JL, et al. The abdominal linea alba: an anatomo-radiologic and biomechanical study. Surg Radiol Anat. 1996;18:281–8.
9. Beer GM, Schuster A, Seifert B, et al. The normal width of the linea alba in nulliparous women. Clin Anat. 2009;22:706–11.
10. Luque JB, Luque AB, Valdivia J, et al. Totally endoscopic surgery on diastasis recti associated with midline hernias.
336
M.Y. Nahabedian
The advantages of a minimally invasive approach. Prospective cohort study. Hernia. 2015;19(3):493–501.
11. Benjamin DR, van de Water ATM, Peiris CL. Effects of exercise on diastasis of the rectus abdominis mus­cle in the antenatal and postnatal periods: a systematic review. Physiotherapy. 2014;100:1–8.
12. Akram J, Matzen SH. Rectus abdominis diastasis. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2014;48(3):163–9.
13. Restrepo JCC, Ahmed JAM. New technique of plication for abdominoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;109:1170.
14. Tadiparthi S, Shokrollahi K, Doyle GS, et al. Rectus sheath plication in abdominoplasty: assessment of its longevity and a review of the literature. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2012;65:328–32.
15. Ferreira LM, Castilho HT, Hochberg J, et al. Triangular mattress suture in abdominal diastasis to prevent epigastric bulging. Ann Plast Surg. 2001;46:130.
16. Nahas FX, Augusto SM, Ghelfond C. Nylon versus polydioxanone in the correction of rectus diastasis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;107:700.
17. Batchvarova Z, Leymarie N, Lepage C, Leyder P. Use of a Submuscular resorbable mesh for correction of severe postpregnancy musculoaponeurotic laxity: an 11-year retrospective study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;121:1240.
18. Huguier V, Faure JL, Doucet C, Giot JP, Dagregorio G. Laparoscopic coupled with classical abdomino­plasty in 10 cases of large rectus diastasis. Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 2012;57:350–5.
19. Emanuelsson P, Gunnarsson U, Strigard K, Stark B. Early complications, pain, and quality of life after reconstructive surgery for abdominal rectus muscle diastasis: a 3-month follow-up. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2014;67:1082–8.
20. Al-Qattan MM. Abdominoplasty in multiparous women with severe musculoaponeurotic laxity. Br J Plast Surg. 1997;50:450.
21. Ishida LH, Gemperli R, Longo MVL, et al. Analysis of the strength of the abdominal fascia in different sutures used in abdominoplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2011;35:435–8.
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
Terri A. Zomerlei and Jeffrey E. Janis
Introduction
Abdominal wall defects, whether spontaneous, traumatic or iatrogenic in origin, are a complex and heterogeneous problem and can challenge surgeons of all experience levels. One tool that that should be in the modern surgeon’s armamen­tarium of useful adjuncts for complex abdominal wall repair is negative pressure wound therapy. Originally designed to expedite healing in chronic wounds such as diabetic foot ulcers, neg­ative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is a sim­ple mechanical device that provides suction over a wound bed [ 14 ]. Suction is a long-established surgical practice method utilized for drainage of wounds. The advantages of formal negative pres­sure wound therapy devices versus simple suc­tion are many and include the ability to tailor wound interface materials, to exchange canisters capable of removing large quantities of exudate, and the option to control both the level of suction (in millimeters of mercury) and the frequency of the suction (continuous vs. noncontinuous/inter­mittent). An important safety feature of all NPWT
T. A. Zomerlei , M.D., M.S. (*) J. E. Janis , M.D., F.A.C.S. Department of Plastic Surgery , Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center , 915 Olentangy River Road, Suite 2100 , Columbus , OH 43212 , USA
Terri.Zomerlei@osumc.edu;
e-mail:
Jeffrey.Janis@osumc.edu
32
devices is the alarm system that warns the user of loss of seal, or excessive fl uid output [ 1 ]. Some specially designed NPWT units are also capable of instillation of isotonic solutions that contain antibacterial or antimicrobial agents. NPWT units vary in size and some units have been developed that are portable and even disposable. All NPWT devices share a similar basic structure with the key components of each device consist­ing of a suction pump capable of generating neg­ative pressure (with power supplied by either battery or electric cord), tubing, a storage canis­ter for effl uent, a sealing apparatus and wound interface material.
Mechanism of Action
There have been many speculations regarding the mechanisms of action behind NPWT and its abil­ity to expedite wound healing. While the exact mechanism of NPWT is largely unknown, it is generally accepted that it is likely a medley of infl uences that contribute to the success of NPWT in healing both acute and chronic wounds.
The theories regarding the mechanism of action of NPWT can be categorized into three broad concepts: fl uid-milieu, alteration or reduc­tion of bacterial burden, and application of mechanical stress.
Wound healing is not a simple linear process but rather a complex series of exchanges among mediators and cells [ 2 ]. The environment or
Y.W. Novitsky (ed.), Hernia Surgery, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-27470-6_32
337© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016
338
T.A. Zomerlei and J.E. Janis
milieu in which these interactions occur can have a negative or positive effect on the wound­healing process [ 3 ]. The interstitial edema that accumulates in wounds can potentially compro­mise the delicate microcirculation causing dele­terious effects on oxygen content delivery to the end tissues. The subatmospheric pressure exerted by NPWT units effi ciently draws this excess fl uid out of the wound bed thus improving the healing environment of the wound. The composition of the wound extracellular matrix is determined by a dynamic balance among overall matrix synthe­sis, deposition, and degradation. Wound extra­cellular matrix itself is a key regulator of cell adhesion, migration, proliferation, and differen­tiation during tissue repair [ 1 ]. NPWT can improve the extracellular wound matrix by removing negative impactors on the wound­healing milieu. These factors, which can act as local tissue toxins, include acute phase proteins, proteolytic enzymes, specifi c cytokines, and metalloproteinases. A recently published system­atic review of the molecular bases behind NPWT mechanism of action suggests that, in contrast, promotion of wound healing occurs by modula­tion of cytokines to an anti-infl ammatory profi le, and mechanoreceptor/chemoreceptor-mediated cell signaling. These interactions then culminate in angiogenesis, extracellular matrix remodeling, and deposition of granulation tissue [ 4 ].
Another hypothesized mechanism of action of NPWT is the reduction of overall bacterial bur­den. Controlled animal studies have demon­strated logarithmic declines in bacterial burdens with use of NPWT, though this has not been able to be reproduced in clinical studies [ 5 , 6 ]. It is thought NPWT may act to decrease the overall bacterial burden of a wound in three ways. First, the closed environment acts as a physical barrier to the encroachment of adjacent skin fl ora. Second, the subatmospheric pressure exerted by the unit physically moves any existing bacteria away from the wound with the interstitial effl u­ent. Lastly, as demonstrated in animal studies by Morykwas, application of subatmospheric pres­sure at 125 mmHg to in vivo tissues improves blood fl ow levels fourfold [ 6 ]. This increase in oxygen in the local tissues not only interferes with the growth of anaerobic bacteria but also
provides additional substrate for neutrophils to use for the oxidative bursts that kill bacteria.
An additional hypothesis on the mechanism of action of NPWT focuses on the biomechanical properties offered by the porous foam interface and the exerted negative pressure. There is a growing body of evidence that suggests healing tissue responds and adapts to the functional demands placed on it. These demands can be subdivided in those that exert macrostrain versus microstrain to the wound. The macrostrain theory postulates that the mechanical force from the interaction of the negative pressure with the wound interface is transmitted to the wound edges drawing them closer together [ 7 ]. In 2004, Saxena fi rst introduced the concept that NPWT improves granulation through application of micromechanical forces or microstrain. Their tis­sue studies revealed that contact with the foam dressing particularly had physical effects on the tissue and noted an increase in the undulating contour of tissues corresponding to the pore geometry on the foam. The surface irregularities imposed by contact with the foam pores increased the surface area that could be subjected to nega­tive pressure without an increase in the overall wound footprint. Specifi cally, the microstrain theory asserts that when more individual cells can be subjected to the application of subatmo­spheric pressure and the mechanical strain and deformational forces leading to cell stretch, cell proliferation and angiogenesis are stimulated leading to promotion of wound healing [ 8 ].
Foam vs. Gauz e
The ability to tailor wound interface materials allows for customization of NPWT to the wound bed. By and large, there are two different dress­ing types that have been explored in the litera­ture; dressing that have a gauze interface and those with a foam substrate. While studies have determined that the pressure transfer to the wound bed is similar in gauze and foam dress­ings, there may be particular clinical circum­stances in which one product may be superior to another [ 9 , 10 ]. Gauze dressings offer ease of application because they do not have to be cut
32 Negative Pressure Wound Therapy
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
339
and shaped to the wound bed. Some studies also report that patients experience less pain during dressing changes with gauze, which is likely related to having less tissues ingrowth with the dressing material [ 11 ]. In addition, as cost sav- ings become an increasingly more pressing mat­ter to our health system, gauze dressings may offer a fi nancial advantage both in cost of materi­als and labor expenses. In a recent randomized trial, the daily cost of NPWT was found to be $96.51 for foam-based dressings versus $4.22 for gauze-based dressings. Likewise NPWT foam dressings were associated with increased time spent on the dressing change with the average time spent clocked at 31 min versus 19 min for the gauze group [ 12 ].
Since the inception of NPWT, foam dressings have been the more traditional wound interface material. Foam dressings are available in multi­ple shapes and sizes that are then cut to size to fi t the wound bed during the dressing application. Several different foam contract dressings are cur­rently employed and they are commonly known and referred to based on their color [ 13 ].
“Black” or open-cell polyurethane foam is the most traditional NPWT dressing and consists of reticulated large open pores (400–600 μm) mak­ing it particularly well suited for wounds that produce large amounts of exudate. The black foam is also hydrophobic and the large pore size allows for maximal interaction between the sub­atmospheric pressure provided by the NPWT and the wound bed, which results in optimizing gran­ulation tissue formation [ 14 ].
Polyvinyl alcohol, or “white” foam, in con­trast is hydrophilic and has a small, dense pore allocation (60–270 μm) making is less adherent to the wound. This composition also results in less removal of exudate and diminished ability of the NPWT to produce granulation tissue. This may be preferable in circumstances where the wound is shallow or overlying prosthetic implants or if its over/near areas that are sensitive to desic­cation or pressure.
Green foam is composed of polyurethane and has an open pore structure that facilitates the monitoring of the wound bed. Green foam pore size is similar to that of black foam, but the ten­sile strength is superior allowing for less foam
residue in the wound bed when the foam inter­face material is removed [ 15 ].
Silver sponges are either polyurethane or polyvinyl sponges that have been coated in silver substrate. The silver coating on the sponges has been found to decrease the odor of infected wounds likely by decreasing the wound bacterial load. Silver-coated sponges are particularly well suited for wounds where contamination is still present (Fig. 32.1 ). The antimicrobial ability of silver dressing is attributed to the strong oxida­tive activity of the silver nanoparticle (AgNP) surfaces and the release of silver ions into the biologic environment [ 16 ]. The oxidative activity and the effects of the silver ions themselves are thought to trigger a series of negative effects on the structures and functions of cells including cytotoxicity, immunological responses, and even cell death.
Subatmospheric Pressur e
An additional feature of modern NPWT units is the ability to vary the level of negative atmo­spheric pressure that is placed over a wound bed. Animal model blood fl ow studies completed by Morykwas in 1996, plotted blood fl ow changes measured with a Doppler needle fl ow probe in soft-tissue and muscle against varying levels of subatmospheric pressure. The blood fl ow changes in both tissues demonstrated similar bell-shaped responses. The application of 125 mmHg of neg­ative pressure produced the optimal response in the tissues with a peak blood fl ow of four times baseline values. Levels of pressure above 400 mmHg were found to have deleterious effects on granulation tissue formation, likely because blood fl ow decreased as the capillary bed blood fl ow was shut down when attempting to over­come perfusion pressure. Based on in vivo stud­ies, pressure levels in the range of 75–125 mmHg are desirable for the microdeformation and strain that produces robust granulation tissue formation [ 17 ]. Clinically, the application of pressure over a wound can produce discomfort and while a pressure of 125 mmHg is generally the “default” setting from NPWT, this level may need to be adjusted lower based on patient tolerance.
340
T.A. Zomerlei and J.E. Janis
Fig. 32.1 A patient with a complex abdominal wall pre­sented for take-down of an enterocutaneous fi stula ( a, b ). Following fi stula take-down, the fascial defect was
In addition to demonstrating the optimal pres­sure to induce peak blood fl ow, Morykwas and his colleagues also compared constant applica­tions of pressure to intermittent pressure applica­tion. In the intermittent studies, peak increases in local blood fl ow declined when “off” intervals were less than 2 min. Based on these results, a 5-min-on/2-min-off cycle for intermittent NPWT was considered optimal for maximizing blood fl ow and granulation formation. These settings were then used in head-to-head comparisons with continuous NPWT. The mean increase in granu­lation tissue formation for the wounds that
repaired with a large pore biologic mesh. A silver NPWT sponge was used for treatment of the contaminated soft­tissue defect because of its antimicrobial properties ( c, d )
received the intermittently prescribed negative pressure was signifi cantly higher than wounds subjected to continuous pressure, specifi cally the intermittently treated wounds demonstrated a near 100%increased rate of granulation tissue formation versus a 60%increase in the continu­ous pressure-treated wounds [ 17 ].
While intermittent pressure application can achieve increased rates of granulation tissue for­mation there are two problems that can be encountered with its use. The fi rst is the applica­tion of pressure can produce discomfort and, in a sensitive patient, the pain would be experienced
32 Negative Pressure Wound Therapy
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
341
every few minutes with the cycling of the unit. In addition, in wounds that produce a large amount of effl uent, the “off” period may allow fl uid to accumulate and breach the adhesive barrier resulting in loss of suction.
Instillation Therapy
A more recent development in NPWT science is the development of units that have the ability for instillation. Antimicrobials or antibiotics in an isotonic fl uid delivery system can be loaded into the units and then instilled over an acutely or chronically infected wound [ 18 ]. The interval and duration of the negative pressure can be con­trolled as well as the type of solution instilled and the solution dwell time. Several fl uids that have been explored in the literature include silver nitrate, Dakin’s solution, and mixed antibiotic solution [ 13 ]. An instillation fl uid that has been utilized and studied specifi cally with use of NPWT is Prontosan (B. Brain, Inc.; Bethlehem, Pa.). Prontosan is composed of polyhexameth­ylene biguanide also known as Polyhexanide, which functions as a preservative that inhibits the growth of microorganisms and Betaine, a surfac­tant, which serves as a cleanser and provides immediate debridement [ 1 , 19 ]. The positive effect of polyhexanide-containing irrigation is thought to be from reduction of bacterial load and biofi lm formation. NPWT with simultaneous irri­gation has been found to further reduce biobur­den over NPWT-treated wounds alone. In addition, using NPWT with installation capabili­ties in grossly infected wounds may have the advantage of potentially reducing trips to the operating room for washouts [ 20 ].
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy and Abdominal Wall Reconstruction
Full-Thickness Abdominal Defect s
Abdominal wall defects present primarily in two varieties, partial-thickness defects and full­thickness defects and the clinical applications of NPWT differs for each.
Full-thickness defects of the abdominal wall commonly occur after surgical intervention to manage a serious insult to the abdomen. Circumstances such as, abdominal trauma, peri­tonitis, decompression of abdominal compart­ment syndrome, or ruptured aneurysm repair, commonly lead to damage control laparotomies. In those circumstances, it is not only not possible to close the abdomen, but also is usually not safe to do so. In this situation, NPWT can be used as a bridge to future more defi nitive closure. Application of NPWT in the situation of an “open abdomen” serves several purposes, including removing exudates and decreasing bowel edema, removing wound contamination, maintaining a closed, moist environment for abdominal viscera and minimizing loss of domain. Early adapta­tions of NPWT utilized to contain the abdominal contents and evacuate infectious material involved the use of an inert, fenestrated plastic sheeting in contact with the viscera, towels, or laparotomy packs placed on top of the sheeting, drains hooked up to wall suction on top of the towels or packs, and an occlusive dressing to seal the wound. Modern NPWT devices for the open abdomen come ready-made with improved func­tion and ease of use. As visceral edema and exu­date are reduced by the negative pressure, the fascia is able to be more closely approximated allowing for either primary repair of the fascia, or repair with use of mesh (Fig. 32.2 ). Commonly, the patient is returned to the operating room every 3–5 days to perform further washout and attempt primary fascial closure or fascial closure with the use of mesh, once contamination is minimized.
Goals with management of the open abdomen are primarily twofold—reduction of mortality rate and achievement of a high fascial closure rate. A consensus document from an expert advi­sory panel outlining best practices for manage­ment of the open abdomen was published in 2009 [ 21 ]. Both the expert advisory committee and a systematic review from the same year deduced that use of a NPWT unit was the superior tech­nique for temporary abdominal closure (TAC). Closure rates were found to be highest with NPWT, ranging between 78 and 93%. In addi­tion, the incidence of fi stulas compared to other techniques was likewise reduced with NPWT