Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_3660_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
49 Мб
Скачать
76 CAROTID TREATMENT: PRINCIPLES AND TECHNIQUES
https://t.me/medicina_free
3-1
Low Bifurcation of the Carotid Artery with Symptomatic Plaque Just at the Origin of the Internal Carotid Artery
AP (A) and lateral (B) radiographs of common carotid injection are shown. In this case, the carotid bifurcation is just in front of the body of the C5 vertebra and the plaque does not ascend higher than the C4-5 disc space. Difculties can arise with an exposure at this low level, where the carotid artery dives deep to the sternocleido­mastoid and omohyoid muscles. Anatomic structures that will be encountered and probably divided include the omohyoid muscle (see Figs. 4-25 and 4-28) and some accessory branches from the jugular vein that are similar to the common facial vein but about 3 inches lower in anatomic location (Fig. 4-14). The difculties with a low bifurcation of this type are: (i) securing enough exposure of the common carotid artery (CCA) to ensure adequate placement of the Rummel tourniquet and (ii) cross-clamping below that site in case placement of an indwelling shunt is needed. In the AP view (A), the internal carotid artery (ICA) swings laterally and thus a standard operating position will sufce. No unusual degree of head turning is required to adequately expose the ICA in this case.
CHAPTER 3: RADIOGRAPHIC STUDIES 77
https://t.me/medicina_free
78 CAROTID TREATMENT: PRINCIPLES AND TECHNIQUES
https://t.me/medicina_free
3-2
High Bifurcation of the Cervical Carotid Artery
These lateral radiographs (A, conventional; B, subtracted; C, digital) of a CCA injection demonstrate what I consider to be a relatively high bifurcation and high extension of the plaque into the ICA. Two major landmarks give some clue as to the degree of difculty of the high exposure, although it is never possible to determine with certainty just how high the surgical exposure will need to extend. The rst of these landmarks is the angle of the mandible, which can be palpated and marked before the skin incision (A), thereby giving some clue as to the degree of difculty that will be encountered in the exposure. The second anatomic landmark is the position of both the bifurcation and the distal extent of the ICA plaque in relation to the cervical section of the spine. In this case, the bifurcation is at the level of the body of C2, and the ICA will need to be exposed at about the C1-2 junction. As emphasized elsewhere in this text, the cardinal principle regarding the ICA is that control must be obtained well distal to the top of the plaque before any consideration of ICA cross-clamping. Failure to do this could result in either embolization of material from cross-clamping or the inability to place a shunt above the area of atheroma, with possible particulate embolization during insertion of the shunt.
A number of surgical strategies must be used when a high bifurcation is encountered, and they will be dis­cussed in greater detail elsewhere in the book (Figs. 4-30 to 4-32). My basic philosophy is that the surgeon needs to be prepared for a high exposure in essentially every carotid surgical procedure. It is far simpler to have the carotid artery well exposed from the beginning than trying either to work up a dark tunnel or to go back and rec­reate the exposure in the middle of the procedure. The skin incision thus goes high and behind the ear in nearly every case (Fig. 4-5), and the anterior border of the sternocleidomastoid muscle is dissected to expose the high jugular vein (Figs. 4-31 and 4-32). A plane of dissection is developed between the jugular vein and the ICA. In an exposure as high as the one illustrated here, the hypoglossal nerve will be mobilized (Fig. 4-29) and the digastric muscle most likely will be at least partially transected (Figs. 4-31 and 4-32). The use of the hinged retractor is particularly important in securing a well-lighted and well-exposed high exposure of the ICA.
I cannot emphasize strongly enough the importance of having the ICA properly exposed before arterial cross-clamping, possible shunting, and arterial repair. There is no worse situation in my mind than having a major electroencephalographic (EEG) change with an inadequately exposed ICA and desperate attempts to increase ICA exposure under this type of pressure.
Incidentally, it should be noted that this patient has an accessory artery (probably the ascending pharyn­geal) arising from the crotch of the carotid bifurcation. It is important to identify these anomalies on pre-operative angiography because failure to recognize and isolate this type of artery will result in extremely troublesome backbleeding during the arteriotomy and arterial repair. The identication of arteries such as this (which occur in my experience in approximately 5% of cases) is one of my strongest arguments in favor of conventional arteri­ography and against the use of magnetic resonance angiography or ultrasound alone in the pre-operative evalu­ation of symptomatic carotid patients. (See Figs. 4-36 and 4-37.)
CHAPTER 3: RADIOGRAPHIC STUDIES 79
https://t.me/medicina_free
80 CAROTID TREATMENT: PRINCIPLES AND TECHNIQUES
https://t.me/medicina_free
3-3
Side-by-Side
An anatomic variant that warrants special pre-operative considerations is what I call the “side-by-side” carotid artery positioning, as illustrated in these AP (A) and lateral (B) views. Whereas the ICA in the AP plane usu­ally lies directly behind the external carotid artery (ECA) or else is rotated somewhat laterally, in a side-by-side carotid artery, it swings medially and is tucked underneath the ECA as it courses medially. Invariably, there is a large kink with a lateral bend of the ICA at a somewhat higher level than is usually exposed surgically, as illustrated here by the arrow in the AP view. This type of bend can hamper shunt placement and should be rec­ognized pre-operatively.
A side-by-side carotid artery represents a more difcult anatomic dissection. In a case such as the one illustrated here, it is necessary to turn the head radically to the opposite side from the surgical incision, thereby swinging the ICA as far lateral as possible. Unfortunately, this process of head turning also brings the sternoclei­domastoid muscle into such a position as to overlie the CCA and carotid bifurcation, and a much greater degree of retraction of both the sternocleidomastoid muscle and the jugular vein is necessary. I also often nd it neces­sary to extensively mobilize the ECA in a side-by-side carotid exposure and dissect much farther around the circumference of the artery than is customarily necessary. This is done to mobilize the ECA medially and allow it to be tacked up by its adventitia if necessary. All these maneuvers are designed to pull the ICA back out from its underlying position to the point where it pops out into a more standard anatomic exposure. (See Figs. 4-4 and 4-33.)
Exposure and mobilization of the ICA must be signicantly higher than the extent of the plaque, usually up to the area of the artery’s lateral bend, as illustrated in the AP view by the arrow (so that the ICA essentially jumps out into a more normal position). Another strategy for accomplishing this is to tack the adventitia of the ICA laterally, once again holding it out in place for the arteriotomy.
It is tempting to consider a reverse style ICA arteriotomy—that is, leaving the side-by-side carotid artery in the position it was found and opening the ICA up its medial side rather than the customary lateral opening, although I have never had occasion to do this. Instead, I prefer to mobilize the ICA out into a more normal posi­tion and then perform the standard lateral wall common and internal carotid arteriotomy and repair.
The signicance of the side-by-side carotid anatomy is that it is possible with pre-operative recognition to plan positioning in such a way that a potentially difcult anatomic situation can be converted to a rather routine carotid endarterectomy.
CHAPTER 3: RADIOGRAPHIC STUDIES 81
https://t.me/medicina_free
82 CAROTID TREATMENT: PRINCIPLES AND TECHNIQUES
https://t.me/medicina_free
3-4
Focal Internal Carotid ArteryUlcer
These cases illustrate the importance of relying on both the clinical history and the angiographic information in deciding which patients are appropriate surgical candidates. In this particular case, AP (A) and lateral (B) radiographs of the left CCA demonstrated a mildly stenotic lesion but with a rather punctate focal ulcer up in the ICA. The bifurcation was low, and the repair appeared to be quite simple. The patient had classic symptoms of transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) stereotypic to the appropriate artery. The photograph here shows the opera­tive specimen in the ICA, which demonstrates the pathologic correlation of a deep focal ulcer with intra-mural thrombus and corresponds nicely with the radiographic nding.
This type of patient and the clinical presentation illustrate to me that despite our progress with cooperative trials, there continue to be situations in which clinical judgment and the presentation of the patient will indicate that symptomatic lesions that are <50% stenotic represent appropriate surgical lesions and should be carefully considered for carotid artery reconstruction.
CHAPTER 3: RADIOGRAPHIC STUDIES 83
https://t.me/medicina_free
84 CAROTID TREATMENT: PRINCIPLES AND TECHNIQUES
https://t.me/medicina_free
3-5
Deep Ulceration of a Carotid Plaque
The photographs of the AP (A) and lateral (B) CCA injection were obtained from a patient with symptomatic right carotid TIAs. Just beyond the carotid bulb, a large pooling of contrast with very little distal ow is seen yielding an initially somewhat confusing radiographic picture. Although this might be mistaken for a false or pseudo-aneurysm in a patient who had undergone a previous carotid dissection, in this particular case it proved to be nothing more than an enormous, deeply ulcerated plaque with pooling of contrast material in a very deep and ragged ulcer (see pathologic specimen shown). The straightforward surgical technique in this case entailed no unusual modications.
CHAPTER 3: RADIOGRAPHIC STUDIES 85
https://t.me/medicina_free