Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5571_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
49 Мб
Скачать
flows, etc. The body is considered to be a series of compartments (usually associa ted with each of the organs; see also Figure 5.24) and relating CL and V
d
of a drug in the rat to the physiology of the rat allows one to apply the same physiological rational to humans to predict the properties of the drug in human.
A series of differential equations is written to account for the movement of the drug from the arterial to the venous side taking into account the role of the clearing organs. Fitting these differential equations to the data collected from each tissue is accom­plished (Figure 5.25) and using various organ- and tissue-specific scaling factors the corresponding profiles for the drug in human tissues can be simulated.
Many commercially available software packages assist with scaling using the PBPK approach such as Gastroplus
. In this software, distribution characteristics of a drug into various tissues have been extrapolated from the basic physicochemical properties of the drug, thereby requiring minimum experimentation. Using this approach, De Buck et al. [28] compared the predictions of 26 clinically tested drugs with projections from Gastroplus
. They reported a 65–74% succe ss in predicting various PK and PD parameters within twofold of the actual data. Although the concepts used in PBPK modeling are scientifically the most relevant, the only way an accurat e model can be constructed is if each tissue in the animal body is taken and
Figure 5.24 The physiological representation of the body for PBPK modeling [26].
238
PHARMACOKINETICS FOR MEDICINAL CHEMISTS
https://t.me/medicina_free
the drug content measured as a function of time. Since this is very tedious in a discovery setting, it has found minimum favor among PK practitioners for the purpose of scaling.
5.5.3 In VitroIn Vivo Correlations
In discovery, there are many examples as well as published papers that have used in vitro results as a guide to better predict and project in vivo data. A majority of these methods have been developed to improve the ability to scale the CL of the compound. Scaling the CL usin g the in vitro intrinsic CL values estimated using the well-stirred, parallel tube, and dispersion models predicted that the scaling factors (CL
intrinsic in vivo
/
CL
intrinsic in vitro
) in humans were very varied. Using the in vitro human CL intrinsic values along with the human scaling factors, the predictions were poor; incorporating the animals scaling factors improved the predictions [29].
Other investigators have used sandwich-cultured human hepatocytes to predict human biliary clearance [30] and in vitro expressed UDP-glucuronosyltransferase to predict the Phase II glucuronidation [31] of compounds. Judicious decisions should be made by project teams in deploying such techniques and methods to benefit the various stages of discovery and development continuum.
5.6 PK PRACTICES
The following section is dedicated to describing practical considerations that should be taken into account when designing and executing PK studies and when analyzing and interpreting PK data. Because of the limited size of this chapter, only a brief outline of the key issues will be given below. More relevant information can be found in the references provided.
Figure 5.25 PBPK modeling of cocaine in the rat [27].
PK PRACTICES 239
https://t.me/medicina_free
5.6.1 PK Studies for Different Stages of Discovery Projects
Animal PK testing is widely used in pharmaceutical discovery. Although different companies may utilize somewhat different approaches and processes in discovering new drugs, the key stages of the discovery projects are fairly similar. A typical discovery project involves four major stage gates: target identification, lead selection, lead optimization, and preclinical development (Figure 5.26). An example of a similar process can be found in the literature [32]. A similar discovery assay by stage (DABS) approach is described by the group of the scientists from Millenium Pharmaceu­ticals [33] who broke the discovery process into four stages: (1) high-throughput screening (HTS), hit-to-lead (HTL), lead optimization (LO), and development candidate (DC).
5.6.1.1 Target Identification The target identification stage focuses primarily on the biology of a selected target. Animal testing, primarily in rodents, is utilized for preliminary evaluation of PK properties of screening hits and/or benchmark com­pounds described in the literature. At this stage, animal PK data can be used to select an appropriate dosage and route of administration that would deliver sufficient exposures in the animal efficacy models to build confidence in the rationale of the biology of the target.
5.6.1.2 Lead Selection The primary purposes of the lead selection stage of the discovery project are to (1) identify the spectrum of ADME properties of several chemical templates (series) and (2) identify the drivers of efficacy by analyzing the relationships between the extent and the duration of the in vivo exposures, efficacy, and target modulation.
In this case, certain tissue distribution studies (e.g., brain penetration) may provide
valuable information. Some initial screening PK is used at this stage to quickly assess
Lead Optimization
Preclinical Development
Lead Selection
Target Identication
Characterize initial
hits and benchmark compounds
Ensure sucient
exposures in animal ecacy studies
Early exploration of
routes of administration and dose for ecacy assessment
Identify ADME issues
with lead chemical series
Dierent routes of
administration for ecacy models
Correlate extent and
duration of exposures with ecacy and target modulation (ecacy drivers)
Target tissue distribution
to ensure exposure at site of action
Routes of elimination
Design and test new compounds to x identied ADME problems
Support of ecacy and
biomarker studies
Formulation evaluation
Characterize a few lead
compounds
Routes of elimination for
in vitro-in vivo
correlation
Support ecacy and
biomarker studies
Dose escalation studies
to support initial toxicology assessment
Multi-species PK to
project human PK
In vivo DDI assessment Enabling formulation
selection based on PK
In vivo biotransformation
assessment
Figure 5.26 The stages of the discovery process and primary purposes of animal PK studies.
240
PHARMACOKINETICS FOR MEDICINAL CHEMISTS
https://t.me/medicina_free
in vitro–in vivo correlation (IVIVC) and identify the reason for their absence. Some initial in vivo mechanistic studies aimed at evaluation of the primary routes of elimination may be conducted in bile-duct cannulated (BDC) rats or even dogs. The lead selection stage of the project is probably the most critical for the success of the entire program because it narrows down the chemical space in which the program will operate and limits the opportunity to modulate and correct any critical pharmaceutical properties (ADME, potency and efficacy, etc.).
5.6.1.3 Lead Optimization Selection of the lead series is a very significant milestone for the discovery project, which now moves to the lead optimization stage. At this stage, the primary efforts of animal tes ting are to fix any identified ADME problems and to identify the best compounds for further advancement. Screening PK studies aimed at driving the design of new compounds with better properties are conducted and PK data cont inues to be used to support efficacy and biomarker studies as well as find reasonable formulations for early safety assessments. A small number of the most promising compounds are identified prior to moving to the next stage.
5.6.1.4 Preclinical Development In the preclinical development stage, research is carried out to prepare for the first-in-human (FIH) dosing of the selected front-running drug candidate. Animal studies may be conducted in a “definitive” rather than a “screening” format because they are used to predict human PK and project an FIH dose. A more detailed evaluation of PK/PD relationships is done in different animal species using biomarkers and efficacy readouts. Usually a fair number of animal studies are done to develop a formulation that will be used in investigational toxicology (IVT) evaluations in rodent (usually rats) and nonrodent (usually dogs but occasionally monkeys) species. As part of a risk assessment, some mechanistic drug–drug interaction (DDI), in vivo biotransformation and metabolite identification studies may be conducted in different animal species and compared to human in vitro DDI studies. Such comparisons help properly select toxicology species.
Once the preclinical package is ready for filing in an investigational new drug (IND) application, preclinical development may be considered complete. Nonethe­less, a significant number of animal studies are usually performed to support further development of the drug candidate. The goal of these studies may be to support a broader safety evaluation of the drug candidate (e.g., reproductive toxicology, carcinogenicity, etc.) or address some specific issues of clinical development (e.g., biotransformation).
5.6.2 Key Parameters of PK Studies
There are several key parameters that have to be taken into account when planning for an animal PK study:
.
compound
.
formulation
.
animal species and strain
PK PRACTICES 241
https://t.me/medicina_free
.
dosing route and frequency
.
sample collection
.
bioanalysis
.
data analysis and reporting.
Those parameters are discussed in the subsequent sections.
5.6.2.1 Compounds There are several critical properties of the compound (some­times referred to as “test compound” or “test article” or “test material”) that need to be discussed and agreed upon between medicinal chemists and the ADME scientists when planning and performing an animal PK study:
.
metabolic stability in expected biological matrices
.
properties related to formulations
.
purity
.
supply
.
physical form.
Compound Metabolic Stability in Expected Biological Matrices Compound sta­bility in the biological matrices planned to be collected and analyzed is a property that may either prevent conducting the study or correctly interpreting the PK data. The metabolic stability of a newly synthesized compound can be measured in vitro in metabolizing organssubcellular fractions (such as microsomes or S9 fractions) or whole cells (such as hepatocytes). This stability may be estimated based upon information obtained for closely related structural analogs or on general knowledge of the metabolism of similar classes of compounds. Ester prodrugs and peptide drug candidates are two well-known examples of compounds whose metabolic stability in biological media needs to be evaluated prior to animal dosing. Although challenging, PK studies of some metabolically unstable compounds can be conducted if some special sample collection techniques are used. For example, exposure to ester prodrugs can be assessed in animal blood or plasma samples if plasma esterases are inhibited immediately upon sample collection by using esterase inhibitors such as paraoxon [34], phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF), sodium fluoride or others [35], or by mixing the blood or plasma samples with water-miscible quenching agents (acetonitrile, methanol, acids, etc.). These agents coagulate proteins and destroy enzymatic activity. However, there is a potential risk of re-esterification of the prodrugs if alcohols are used as the blood- or plasma-quenching agents. While technically feasible, such techniques need to be considered in the context of drug development program, and a team should consider whether a molecule with such metabolic liabilities is an appropriate clinical candidate.
Metabolic instability of test compounds in biological media may lead to an overestimated total clearance of the compound, which may be higher than the total hepatic blood flow in the animal species. When a new series of chemical compounds is
242 PHARMACOKINETICS FOR MEDICINAL CHEMISTS
https://t.me/medicina_free
chosen for evaluation in the lead selection stage of the project, metabolic instability may become a deselecting criterion for the entire series or individual molecules.
In vitro metabolic stability in animal plasma is typically evaluated as the first parameter for new compounds. The assay is fairly straightforward and may be performed by spik ing a stock solution of the compound into animal plasma to produce an incubation mixture maintained at 37
o
C and monitoring the disappearance of the parent molecule or appearance of some known or expected metabolites usually using liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC/MS) quantitation.
The use of at least one positive control (a compound with a known and accurately measurable metabolic half-life) is highly recommended for these experiments since enzymatic activity of the plasma may be reduced upon its storage and handling.
Also, some organic solvents (e.g., DMSO) used for preparation of the stock solution may inhibit plasma enzymes responsible for biotransformation of the compounds. As a rule of thumb, the maximum concentration of DMSO in the incubation mixture should not exceed 0.1%. Higher percentages of organic solvents can potentially be used for low-solubility compounds if a positive control with a similar mechanism of metabolism is used as a reference.
Another potential source of data variability or error is evaporation from the incubation mixture. This can happen if the mixture is sampled multiple times to determine metabolic stability of the compounds at multiple time points. A better assay format may utilize preparing a “bulk” amount of the incubation mixture sufficient for generating multiple individual incubation samples in the tubes with caps or on the plate with tight lids. These individual samples can be quenched at different time points to establish a metabolic stability time course.
If the compound needs to be quantified in the animals organs and tissues, it may be necessary to generate some data for metabolic stability in those tissues, homogenates, or subcellular fractions.
Usually the PK matrix metabolic stability experiments are performed in a “quick and dirty” format with a relative rather then absolute LC/MS quantitation. The analyte peak area is used for quantification and ranking of compounds (see Section 5.6.2.7).
Compound Properties Related to Formulations The solubility and the chemical and physical stability of the test compounds are critical for preparing a suitable formulation for in vivo administration.
SOLUBILITY Sufficient solubility of the compound is especially important for intra-
venous formulations that require true solutions with no microparticles. Another limitation for IV formulation is that the dose volumes are more restricted and typically should not exceed 5 mL/kg. If the maximum solubility of a compound in a particular IV formulation is 1 mg/mL, the maximum IV dose that can be achieved in the animal study is 5 mg/kg.
CHEMICAL STABILITY Chemical stability of the compound may be experimentally
evaluated prior to preparing an appropriate formulation. Typically, acid- or base­catalyzed degradation of the compound may lead to its limited stability in solution or
PK PRACTICES 243
https://t.me/medicina_free
solid form. The stability of the compound in solution typically can be assessed at pH 1–2 (representing gastric pH of human and some animal species) and pH 6–9 (representing intestinal pH of different sections of the intestine from duodenum to colon). The duration of the stability experiments depends on the expected time between the formulation preparation and animal dosing, which may range from several minutes to 12–24 h.
If the compound is prepared as a salt of a strong acid (e.g., HCl or TFA) for PK, it is recommended to assess its stability at least at room temperature with a typical ambient humidity. It is strongly advised to conduct this stability if the salt form is hygroscopic.
Another source of compound instability is photodegradation due to light exposure. In this case, the compound can be maintained in amber glass vials and handled in the labs equipped with yellow lamps.
Oxidation by atmospheric oxygen may make handling the compound challenging and reduce the probability for commercialization.
HYGROSCOPICITY Hygroscopicity of the compound may lead to higher instability in
solid form as well as to the absorption of atmospheric moisture that may change the correction factor for the content of the parent compound content in the material used for animal studies.
CRYSTALLINITY A crystalline form of the compound does not impact true solution
formulations but may have a profound effect on suspension formulations used for oral dosing.
Usually, in the early stages of a project, a new compound is purified using liquid chromatography followed by lyophilization of the collected fractions. Frequently this process leads to an amorphous form of the compound with a lower melting point and higher solubility. Higher solubility of the amorphous compound may facilitate its dissolution in oral dosing suspensions which, in turn, may lead to a higher fraction absorbed and higher oral bioavailability of the amorphous compound compared to its crystalline form. If the compound may exist in different crystalline forms (polymorphs), different polymorphs may exhibit different PK properties such as ritonavir [36, 37].
ELECTROSTATICS If the compound is amorphous (frequently fluffy), it may be
electrostatic and require special handling to avoid loss of material when transferring to a vial. When possible, transfer of the material should be minimized or avoided. A potential good practice may be to determine the weight of the empty vials used for lyophilization so the weight of the solid material can be accurately determined and used for formulation work without material transfer. If transfer of solid material is still required, certain devices reducing static electricity can be used to reduce the risk of losing compound.
Compound Purity There are several aspects of compound purity that may impact PK studies. The test compound must be pure enough for safe administration in animals. Even if the impurities do not cause animal death, animal health and physiology can be
244 PHARMACOKINETICS FOR MEDICINAL CHEMISTS
https://t.me/medicina_free
impacted, which, in turn, may affect ADME properties of the compound. Both the absolute content of the desired compound in the material prepared for animal dosing as well as the quantity and spectrum of potential biological/toxicological properties of undesired impurities must be well understood.
Typically, the total purity of the compound intended for animal administration in preclinical PK is expected to be not less than 95%. Lower content of the test compound may be scientifically justified if the impurities are represented by known and fairly safe components (water, certain salts). Conversely, greater than 95% purity of the test compound may not be sufficient for animal PK if the impurities are highly toxic components of chemical synthesis or purification of the compounds (reagents, catalysts, side products).
The total content of the test compound (purity) needs to be taken into account in calculating the total amount of the material required for animal dosing. Total content of the test compound may change due to sample storage and handling. For example, if the acid in the salt form of the compound is not strongly associated with the parent molecule, there is a possibility for the acid to be fully or partially released from the test material leading to increased formal purity of the material. If the compound is hygroscopic, it may absorb atmospheric moisture and reduce the percentage of the test compound in the material leading to a reduced formal purity of the test material. It is critical for medicinal chemists to clearly communicate to their ADME colleagues the best practices in compound storage and handling.
Residual solvent in the amorphous samples of the compound needs to be calculated to determine the purity of the compound. Proton or
13
C-NMR may provide qualitative
and in some cases quantitative inform ation about the residual solvent content.
Amount of Compound Required for Rat PK Studies The amount of compound required for a particular PK study can be calculated using the following equation:
CR ¼
DL BW GS NA
P
Overage ð5:51Þ
where CR is the amount of the compound required for the study (mg), DL is a dose level (mg/kg), BW is the animal body weight (kg), GS is an animal group size (the number of animals on study), NA is the number of administrations (in case of a multidose experiments), P is the purity of the test material.
Typical animal weights can be found in Appendix 5.A.1. However,it may be a good practice to consult with ADME sci entists on the actual weight of the animals for a particular study especially if less typical animal strains or younger or older animals are used.
Additional material may be needed to be reserved for the formulation work if the compound is new and a suitable formulation is not yet developed.
Some material needs to be reserved for preparation of the calibration standards and quality control samples for bioanalysis of the PK samples. Usually this amount is relatively low compared to the test material required for animal dosing. It is a good
PK PRACTICES 245
https://t.me/medicina_free
practice to reserve a small quantity (at least several milligrams) of the most pure material as an analytical standard for bioanalysis.
The number of administrations depends on the durati on of the study and the frequency of daily administration. Early PK studies typically utilize a single once­daily (QD) administration of the compound. However, some efficacy or toxicology studies may require multiday and more than once-daily administration.
Overage of the compound is needed due to the inevitable loss of material during sample transfer, formulation preparation, and administration of the compound especially in the case of oral gavage of suspensions. Studies with smaller animals may require higher overage due to higher loss of material in the formulation vessels, syringes, etc. Studies with different animals may require different overages typically ranging from 1.1 to 1.5 with an average of about 1.2.
Example: The total amount of a 95% pure material for a single dose 1 mg/kg PK study with two rats on study can be estimated based on a 0.3-kg rat weight as
CR ðmgÞ¼
1mg=kg 0:3kg=rat 2 rats 1 administration
0:95
1:2 ð5:52Þ
In this example, the minimum amount not including the material for the formu­lation development and bioanalysis is 0.75 mg.
Physical Form of Compounds The compound for animal dosing can be delivered to ADME scientists in several forms such as solids, solutions, or oils.
SOLIDS Solid materials are perhaps most frequently used as a source of animal
dosing. Advantages of solid materials include ready transferability from one con­tainer to another (assuming they are not electrostatic) and the stability may potentially be higher than a solution form. It is common in the pharmaceutical industry to maintain the samples of small molecule drug candidates as a solid material in dry and oxygen-free conditions. The disadvantage of solid material for animal dosing is that more material is usually lost due to transfer between containers.
Careful consideration is required when several different batches of the compound are combined in order to create a single batch for animal dosing. The advantage of combining several batches is that the final batch has uniform purity and crystallinity if the batches are dissolved together and recrystallized. When supplying compound to the ADME scientist for animal dosing, avoid delivering several batches in separate vials. This forces either the scientist preparing the dose or the analyst to determine the percentage of parent compound out of a variety of salt forms and/or purities and can lead to mathematical or dosing errors.
SOLUTIONS Dissolving a newly synthesized compound in certain organic solvents
(typically DMSO) to prepare a concentrated stock solution for initial testing is a common practice in the pharmaceutical industry.The advantage of using a solubilized form of the compound is that it is easy to transfer the solution from container to container (e.g., from a master 96-well plate to secondary plates) with minimal loss.
246 PHARMACOKINETICS FOR MEDICINAL CHEMISTS
https://t.me/medicina_free
This process can be highly automated to increase efficiency and human error. The disadvantage of using a solution of the compound is that different compounds may require individualized selection of the best solvents for solubilization, which is difficult to achieve in the modern industrialized pharmaceutical setting. Incomplete solubility of the compounds in standard solvents (e.g., DMSO or acetonitrile) may lead to erroneous initial concentrations of the stock solutions. Even if the compound is initially fully soluble in the stock solution, it may absorb atmospheric moisture or fall out of solution.
Incomplete solubility of the compound in the solution or its falling out of solution upon storage may cause inconsistency of the PK data. A potential solution to incomplete solubility of the compound may be to spin down the stock solution and use the supernatant as a source for formulation work and as the stock solution for preparing calibration curves in bioanalysis.
A compound may not be completely chemically stable in a solvent. Although frequently used as a solvent, DMSO may chemically react with certain compounds (e.g., thiol- or isothiocyanate-containing molecules).
Another potential disadvantage of using solutions as a source of animal testing is that the formulation of the compound will contain the solvent that may not be acceptable or preferred as a component of the formulation vehicle.
OILS Some compounds may exist in an oil form due to a low melting point (lower
than the ambient temperature) or due to the presence of some residual solvents used for the synthesis or purification. Transferring and weighing oily compounds may be a challenging task for ADME scientists especially if the oils are very viscous. Another problem is that the oily compounds may contain a significant and/or not well-defined amount of the residual solvents. Thus, it is difficult to calculate the purity of the compound and the actual concentration in the dosing solution.
5.6.2.2 Formulations A very brief overview of formulation development for animal dosing, some examples of the excipients and formulation recipes, and practical suggestions for formulating discovery compounds are presented. The area of drug formulations is large and more information can be found in the following publica­tions [38–46]. Additionally, medicinal chemists should consult with their pharma­ceutical science colleagues on the best approaches in formulation development.
Developing a suitable formulation of a compound for animal dosing is one of the major limitations for early PK studies because the current information about the solubility and chemical and physical stability of the compound may be very limited. Evaluationof potential formulations may require a fairly substantial amount of the test material and experimentation. Thus medicinal chemists should collect as much in vitro ADME, solubility, and chemical and metabolic stabilityfor the compound series. Even incomplete information or “educated guesses” may be valuable for initial solubiliza­tion of the compound that can then be diluted in some standard formulation vehicle.
Additional techniques can be used to solubilize the compound. Prolonged and vigorous vortexing may be helpful if the dissolution kinetics is slow. Sonication and heating may help dissolve the compound, although there is a risk of thermal
PK PRACTICES 247
https://t.me/medicina_free