Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_2645_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
49 Мб
Скачать
OTOLARYNGOLOGY DISORDERS
https://t.me/med1917
CMDT 2025
219
in the setting of AIDS or hematologic malignancy with neutropenia, mortality approaches 100%. Whether to undertake aggressive surgical management should be con­sidered carefully because many patients are gravely ill at the time of diagnosis, and overall disease-specific survival is only about 57%.
Khullar T et al. CT imaging features in acute invasive fungal
rhinosinusitis—recalling the oblivion in the COVID era. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2022;51:798. [PMID: 35249797]
Luo YT et al. Diagnostic and therapeutic strategies of acute inva-
sive fungal rhinosinusitis. Asian J Surg. 2023;46:58. [PMID: 35589479]
Tessler I et al. Impact of azole antifungal treatment on outcome
in acute invasive fungal rhinosinusitis with orbitocranial involvement: a surgical perspective. Rhinology. 2023;61:561. [PMID: 37566791]
ALLERGIC RHINITIS
ESSENTIALS OF DIAGNOSIS
»
Clear rhinorrhea, sneezing, tearing, eye irritation, and pruritus.
»
Associated symptoms include cough, broncho­spasm, and eczematous dermatitis.
»
Environmental allergen exposure in the presence of allergen-specific IgE.
» General Considerations
Allergic rhinitis is very common in the United States with population studies reporting a prevalence of 20–30% of adults and up to 40% of children. Allergic rhinitis adversely affects school and work performance, costing about $6 billion annually in the United States through direct costs of therapy as well as the indirect costs of sleep deprivation, fatigue and reduced productivity, or absenteeism. Seasonal allergic rhinitis is most commonly caused by pollens and spores. Flowering shrub and tree pollens are most common in the spring, flowering plants and grasses in the summer, and ragweed and molds in the fall. Climate change may have an impact on the occurrence of allergic rhinitis since increased temperature and carbon dioxide exposure cause increased pollen production in ragweed plants and since the extended duration of summer correlates with longer periods of pollen production in these and other flowering weeds. Dust, household mites, air pollution, and pet dan­der may produce year-round symptoms, termed “perennial rhinitis.”
» Clinical Findings
The symptoms of “hay fever” are similar to those of viral rhinitis but are usually persistent and may show seasonal variation. Nasal symptoms are often accompanied by eye irritation, pruritus, conjunctival erythema, and excessive tearing. Many patients have a strong family history of atopy or allergy.
The clinician should be careful to distinguish allergic rhinitis from other types of nonallergic rhinitis. Vasomo- tor rhinitis (sometimes called senile rhinitis) is caused by increased sensitivity of the vidian nerve and is a common cause of clear rhinorrhea in older adults. Often patients will report that they have troubling rhinorrhea in response to numerous nasal stimuli, including warm or cold air, odors or scents, light, or particulate matter. Other types of rhinitis, including gustatory, atrophic, and drug-induced rhinorrhea, have also been described.
On physical examination, the mucosa of the turbinates is usually pale or violaceous because of venous engorge­ment. This is in contrast to the erythema of viral rhinitis. Nasal polyps, which are yellowish boggy masses of hyper­trophic mucosa, are associated with long-standing allergic rhinitis.
» Treatment
A. Intranasal Corticosteroids
Intranasal corticosteroid sprays remain the mainstay of treatment of allergic rhinitis. They are more effective—and
frequently less expensive—than nonsedating antihista­mines, though patients should be reminded that there may be a delay in onset of relief of 2 or more weeks. Corticoste­roid sprays may also shrink hypertrophic nasal mucosa and nasal polyps, thereby providing an improved nasal airway and ostiomeatal complex drainage. Because of this effect, intranasal corticosteroids are critical in treating allergy in patients prone to recurrent acute bacterial rhinosinusitis or chronic rhinosinusitis. Available preparations include beclomethasone (42 mcg/spray twice daily per nostril), flunisolide (25 mcg/spray twice daily per nostril), mometa­sone furoate (200 mcg once daily per nostril), budesonide (100 mcg twice daily per nostril), and fluticasone propio­nate (200 mcg once daily per nostril). All are considered equally effective. Probably the most critical factors are compliance with regular use and proper introduction into the nasal cavity. In order to deliver medication to the region of the middle meatus, proper application involves holding the bottle straight up with the head tilted forward and pointing the bottle toward the ipsilateral ear when spray- ing. Side effects are limited, the most annoying being epi­staxis (perhaps related to incorrect delivery of the medication toward the nasal septum).
B. Antihistamines
Antihistamines offer temporary, but immediate, control of many of the most troubling symptoms of allergic rhinitis. Effective oral antihistamines include nonsedating lorata­dine (10 mg once daily), desloratadine (5 mg once daily), and fexofenadine (60 mg twice daily or 120 mg once daily), and minimally sedating cetirizine (10 mg once daily). Brom­pheniramine or chlorpheniramine (4 mg orally every 6–8 hours, or 8–12 mg orally every 8–12 hours as a sus­tained-release tablet) and clemastine (1.34–2.68 mg orally twice daily) may be less expensive but are usually associ­ated with some drowsiness. The safety and efficacy of the newer, less-sedating antihistamines is so compelling that one of them, the H1-receptor antagonist nasal spray
220 CMDT 2025
https://t.me/med1917
CHAPTER 8
azelastine (1–2 sprays per nostril daily), is now included in the treatment guidelines of many consensus statements; however, some patients object to its bitter taste. Other side effects of oral antihistamines besides sedation include xerostomia and antihistamine tolerance (with eventual return of allergy symptoms despite initial benefit after sev­eral months of use). In such patients, typically those with perennial allergy, alternating effective antihistamines peri­odically can control symptoms over the long term. The FDA has approved a nasal spray containing the corticoste­roid mometasone (25 mcg) and the H1-inhibitor olopata­dine hydrochloride (665 mcg) (Ryaltris) for seasonal allergic rhinitis. The dosage is 2 sprays in each nostril daily. The long-term efficacy of this medication is not yet known.
C. Adjunctive Treatment Measures
Antileukotriene medications, such as montelukast (10 mg/ day orally), alone or with cetirizine (10 mg/day orally) or loratadine (10 mg/day orally), may improve nasal rhinor­rhea, sneezing, and congestion. Cromolyn sodium and sodium nedocromil may be useful adjunct agents for aller­gic rhinitis. They work by stabilizing mast cells and pre­venting proinflammatory mediator release. As topical agents, they have very few side effects, but they must be initiated well before allergen exposure (up to 4 weeks before). The most useful form of cromolyn is probably the ophthalmologic preparation placed dropwise into the nasal cavity. Intranasal cromolyn is cleared rapidly and must be administered four times daily for continued symptom relief. In practice, it is not nearly as effective as inhaled corticosteroid.
Intranasal anticholinergic agents, such as ipratropium bromide 0.03% or 0.06% sprays (42–84 mcg per nostril three times daily), may be helpful adjuncts when rhinor­rhea is a major symptom. They are not as effective for treat­ing allergic rhinitis but are more useful for treating vasomotor rhinitis.
Avoiding or reducing exposure to airborne allergens is the most effective means of alleviating symptoms of allergic rhi­nitis. Depending on the allergen, this can be extremely
difficult. Maintaining an allergen-free environment by covering pillows and mattresses with plastic covers, substi­tuting synthetic materials (foam mattress, acrylics) for animal products (wool, horsehair), and removing dust­collecting household fixtures (carpets, drapes, bedspreads, wicker) is worth the attempt to help more troubled patients. Air purifiers and dust filters may also aid in maintaining an allergen-free environment. Nasal saline irrigations are a useful adjunct in the treatment of allergic rhinitis to mechanically flush the allergens from the nasal cavity. When symptoms are extremely bothersome, a search for offending allergens may prove helpful. This can either be done by serum radioallergosorbent test (RAST) testing or skin testing by an allergist.
In some cases, allergic rhinitis symptoms are inade­quately relieved by medication and avoidance measures. Often, such patients have a strong family history of atopy and may also have lower respiratory manifestations, such as allergic asthma. Referral to an otolaryngologist or allergist for immunotherapy may be appropriate.
Such treatment involves proper identification of offending allergens, progressively increasing doses of allergen(s), and eventual maintenance dose administration over a period of 3–5 years. Immunotherapy has been proven to reduce cir­culating IgE levels in patients with allergic rhinitis and reduce the need for allergy medications. Both subcutane­ous and topical immunotherapy have been shown to be effective in the long-term treatment of refractory allergic rhinitis.
Park M et al. Sublingual immunotherapy persistence and
adherence in real-world settings: a systematic review. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2023;13:924. [PMID: 36083179]
Wang H et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of
loratadine combined with montelukast for the treatment of allergic rhinitis. Front Pharmacol. 2023;14:1287320. [PMID: 37915414]
OLFACTORY DYSFUNCTION
ESSENTIALS OF DIAGNOSIS
»
Subjective diminished smell or taste sensation.
»
Lack of objective nasal obstruction.
»
Objective decrease in olfaction demonstrated by testing.
» General Considerations
Anatomic blockage of the nasal cavity with subsequent airflow disruption is the most common cause of olfactory dysfunction (hyposmia or anosmia). Polyps, septal defor­mities, and nasal tumors may be the cause. Due to localized inflammation, transient olfactory dysfunction often accompanies the common cold, nasal allergies, and peren­nial rhinitis through changes in the nasal and olfactory epithelium. About 20% of olfactory dysfunction is idio­pathic, although it often follows a viral illness.
CNS neoplasms, especially those that involve the olfac­tory groove or temporal lobe, also may affect olfaction and should be considered in patients with no other explanation for their hyposmia. Head trauma is also a rare but severe cause of olfactory dysfunction due to shearing of the olfac­tory sensory cells. Head trauma accounts for less than 5% of cases of hyposmia but is more commonly associated with anosmia than with hyposmia. Absent, diminished, or distorted smell has been reported in a wide variety of endo­crine, nutritional, and nervous disorders.
» Clinical Findings
Evaluation of olfactory dysfunction should include a thor­ough history of systemic illnesses and medication use as well as a physical examination focusing on the nose and nervous system. Nasal obstruction (from polyps, trauma, foreign bodies, or nasal masses) can cause functional hyposmia. Most clinical offices are not set up to test olfac­tion, but such tests may at times be worthwhile if only to
OTOLARYNGOLOGY DISORDERS
https://t.me/med1917
CMDT 2025
221
assess whether a patient possesses any sense of smell at all.
The University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) is available commercially and is a simple, self-
administered “scratch-and-sniff ” test that is useful in dif­ferentiating hyposmia, anosmia, and malingering.
» Treatment
Olfactory dysfunction secondary to nasal polyposis, obstruction, and chronic rhinosinusitis may respond to surgically removing the anatomic blockage, as with endo­scopic sinus surgery. Unfortunately, there is no specific treatment for primary disruption of olfaction; some distur­bances spontaneously resolve. The degree of olfactory dysfunction is the greatest predictor of recovery, with less severe olfactory dysfunction recovering at a much higher rate. In permanent olfactory dysfunction, counseling should be offered about seasoning foods (such as using pepper that stimulates the trigeminal as well as olfactory chemoreceptors, rather than table salt) and safety issues (such as installing home smoke alarms and using electric rather than gas appliances).
Cabrera CI et al. Comparison of the incidence of smell and taste
disorders between influenza and COVID-19. Am J Otolaryn­gol. 2023;45:104176. [PMID: 38157588]
Krishnakumar HN et al. Pathogenesis and progression of
anosmia and dysgeusia during the COVID-19 pandemic. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023;280:505. [PMID: 36209486]
Minutello KM. Olfactory-related adverse events: an analysis of
the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Events Reporting System. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023 Dec 29. [Epub ahead of print] [PMID: 38156529]
O’Byrne L et al. Interventions for the treatment of persistent
post-COVID-19 olfactory dysfunction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022;9:CD013876. [PMID: 36062970]
Schepens EJA et al. Diagnostic accuracy of the screenings Snif-
fin’ Sticks Test (SST-12) in COVID-19 induced olfactory dis­orders. PLoS One. 2024;19:e0295911. [PMID: 38198490]
EPISTAXIS
ESSENTIALS OF DIAGNOSIS
»
Bleeding from a unilateral anterior nasal cavity along the septum is most common.
»
Most cases may be successfully treated by direct pressure on the bleeding site for 15 minutes. When this is inadequate, topical sympathomimet­ics and various nasal tamponade methods are usually effective.
»
Posterior, bilateral, or large-volume epistaxis should be triaged immediately to a specialist in a critical care setting.
» General Considerations
Epistaxis is an extremely common problem in the primary care setting. Bleeding is most common in the anterior sep­tum where a confluence of veins creates a superficial venous
plexus (Kiesselbach plexus). Predisposing factors include nasal trauma (nose picking, foreign bodies, forceful nose blowing), rhinitis, nasal mucosal drying from low humidity or supplemental nasal oxygen, deviation of the nasal sep­tum, atherosclerotic disease, hereditary hemorrhagic telan­giectasia (Osler-Weber-Rendu syndrome), inhaled nasal cocaine (or other drugs), and alcohol abuse. Poorly con­trolled hypertension is associated with epistaxis. Anticoagu­lation or antiplatelet medications may be associated with a higher incidence, more frequent recurrence, and greater difficulty in control of epistaxis, but they do not cause it.
» Clinical Findings
Laboratory assessment of bleeding parameters may be indicated, especially in recurrent epistaxis. Once the acute episode has passed, careful examination of the nose and paranasal sinuses is indicated to rule out neoplasia and hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia. Repeated evalua­tion for diagnosis and treatment of clinically significant hypertension should be performed following control of epistaxis and removal of any packing.
» Treatment
Most cases of anterior epistaxis may be successfully treated by direct pressure on the site by compression of the nares continu­ously for 15 minutes. Venous pressure is reduced in the sit-
ting position, and slight leaning forward. Positioning the head backwards is not recommended because this may result in blood going toward the airway, resulting in possible aspiration. Similarly, pinching the bridge of the nose is gen­erally ineffective as the origin of bleeding typically occurs at the tip. Short-acting topical nasal decongestants (eg, phenyl­ephrine, 0.125–1% solution, one or two sprays or oxy­metazoline), which act as vasoconstrictors, may also help. When the bleeding does not readily subside, the nose should be examined, using good illumination and suction, in an attempt to locate the bleeding site. When directly visible, the bleeding site may be cauterized with silver nitrate, dia­thermy, or electrocautery. A supplemental patch of Surgicel or Gelfoam may be helpful with a moisture barrier, such as petroleum-based ointment, to prevent drying and crusting.
Occasionally, a site of bleeding may be inaccessible to direct control, or attempts at direct control may be unsuc­cessful. In such cases, there are a number of alternatives. When the site of bleeding is anterior, a hemostatic sealant, pneumatic or other nasal tamponade, or anterior packing may suffice as the latter may be accomplished with several feet of lubricated iodoform packing systematically placed in the floor of the nose and then the vault of the nose.
About 5% of nasal bleeding originates in the posterior nasal cavity, commonly associated with atherosclerotic disease and hypertension. In such cases, it may be neces­sary to consult an otolaryngologist for a pack to occlude the choana before placing a pack anteriorly. In emergency settings, double balloon packs (Epistat) may facilitate rapid control of bleeding with little or no mucosal trauma. Because such packing is uncomfortable, bleeding may per­sist, and vasovagal syncope is possible, hospitalization for monitoring and stabilization is indicated. Posterior nasal
222 CMDT 2025
https://t.me/med1917
CHAPTER 8
packing is quite uncomfortable and may require an opioid analgesic for pain control.
Surgical management of epistaxis, through ligation of the nasal arterial supply (internal maxillary artery and ethmoid arteries) is indicated when direct pressure and nasal packing fail. The most common approach to surgical treatment is endoscopic sphenopalatine artery ligation. This method has a reported efficacy of 73–100% in studies; however, it may miss bleeds caused by the ethmoid arterial supply. Alternatively, endovascular epistaxis control is highly effective (75–92%) and can address all sources of intranasal bleeding except those from the anterior ethmoid artery. Its use may be reserved for when a surgical approach fails because it is associated with a 1.1–1.5% risk of stroke.
After control of epistaxis, the patient is advised to avoid straining and vigorous exercise for several days. Nasal saline should be applied to the packing frequently to keep the packing moist. Avoidance of hot or spicy foods and tobacco is also advisable, since these may cause nasal vasodilation. Avoiding nasal trauma, including nose picking, is an obvi­ous necessity. Lubrication with petroleum jelly or bacitracin ointment and increased home humidity may also be useful ancillary measures. Finally, antistaphylococcal antibiotics (eg, cephalexin, 500 mg orally four times daily, or clindamy­cin, 150 mg orally four times daily) generally are indicated to reduce the risk of toxic shock syndrome developing while the packing remains in place (at least 5 days).
» When to Refer
• Patients with recurrent epistaxis, large-volume epi-
staxis, and episodic epistaxis with associated nasal
obstruction should be referred to an otolaryngologist
for endoscopic evaluation and possible imaging.
• Those with ongoing bleeding beyond 15 minutes should
be taken to a local emergency department if the clini-
cian is not prepared to manage acute epistaxis.
Chitsuthipakorn W et al. Treatments of epistaxis in hereditary
hemorrhagic telangiectasia: systematic review and network
meta-analysis. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2023;23:689.
[PMID: 37995018]
D’Aguanno V et al. Clinical recommendations for epistaxis man-
agement during the COVID-19 pandemic. Otolaryngol Head
Neck Surg. 2020;163:75. [PMID: 32366173]
Thiele B et al. Sclerotherapy for hereditary hemorrhagic telangi-
ectasia-related epistaxis: a systematic review. Ann Otol Rhinol
Laryngol. 2023;132:82. [PMID: 35152768]
Tran QK et al. Nasal packing in the emergency department: a
practical review for emergency providers. Open Access
Emerg Med. 2021;13:527. [PMID: 34880690]
Tran QK et al. Prophylactic antibiotics for anterior nasal packing
in emergency department: a systematic review and meta-
analysis of clinically-significant infections. Am J Emerg Med.
2020;38:983. [PMID: 31839514]
NASAL TRAUMA
The nasal pyramid is the most frequently fractured bone in the body. Fracture is suggested by crepitance or palpably
mobile bony segments. Epistaxis and pain are common, as are soft-tissue hematomas (“black eye”). It is important to
make certain that there is no palpable step-off of the infra­orbital rim, which would indicate the presence of a zygo­matic complex fracture. Radiologic confirmation may at times be helpful but is not necessary in uncomplicated nasal fractures. It is also important to assess for possible concomitant additional facial, spine, pulmonary, or intra­cranial injuries when the circumstances of injury are sug­gestive, as in the case of automobile and motorcycle accidents.
Treatment is aimed at maintaining long-term nasal airway patency and cosmesis. Closed reduction can be performed under local or general anesthesia; closed reduc­tion under general anesthesia appears to afford better patient satisfaction and decreased need for subsequent revision septoplasty or rhinoplasty.
Intranasal examination should be performed in all cases to rule out septal hematoma, which appears as a widening
of the anterior septum, visible just posterior to the colu­mella. The septal cartilage receives its only nutrition from its closely adherent mucoperichondrium. An untreated subperichondrial hematoma will result in loss of the nasal cartilage with resultant saddle nose deformity, septal perfo­ration, or both. Septal hematomas may become infected, with S aureus most commonly, and should be drained with an incision in the inferior mucoperichondrium on both sides. The drained fluid should be sent for culture.
Packing for 2–5 days is often helpful to help prevent re­formation of the hematoma. Antibiotics with antistaphylo­coccal efficacy (eg, cephalexin, 500 mg four times daily, or clindamycin, 150 mg four times daily) should be given for 3–5 days or the duration of the packing to reduce the risk of toxic shock syndrome.
TUMORS & GRANULOMATOUS DISEASE
1. Benign Nasal Tumors
A. Nasal Polyps
Nasal polyps are pale, edematous, mucosally covered masses commonly seen in patients with allergic rhinitis. They may result in chronic nasal obstruction and a dimin­ished sense of smell. In patients with nasal polyps and a history of asthma, aspirin should be avoided because it may precipitate a severe episode of bronchospasm, known as triad asthma (Samter triad). Such patients may have an immunologic salicylate sensitivity.
Use of topical intranasal corticosteroids improves the quality of life in patients with nasal polyposis and chronic rhinosinusitis. Initial treatment with topical nasal corti­costeroids (see Allergic Rhinitis section for specific medi­cations) for 1–3 months is usually successful for small polyps and may reduce the need for operation. A short course of oral corticosteroids (eg, prednisone, 6-day course using 21 [5 mg] tablets: 6 tablets [30 mg] on day 1 and tapering by 1 tablet [5 mg] each day) may also be of benefit, but when polyps are massive or medical manage­ment is unsuccessful obstructing polyps may be removed surgically. Polyps may readily be removed using endo­scopic sinus surgery techniques. It may be necessary to remove polyps from the ethmoid, sphenoid, and maxillary
OTOLARYNGOLOGY DISORDERS
https://t.me/med1917
CMDT 2025
223
sinuses to provide longer-lasting relief and open the affected sinuses. Intranasal corticosteroids should be con­tinued following polyp removal to prevent recurrence, and the clinician should consider allergen testing to determine the offending allergen and avoidance measures. There are emerging treatments using biologics, such as dupilumab, for treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis with polyps.
Barroso B et al. Improvement in smell using monoclonal anti-
bodies among patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: a systematic review. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2023;33:419. [PMID: 37669083]
Papacharalampous GX et al. Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal
polyps (CRSwNP) treated with omalizumab, dupilumab, or mepolizumab: a systematic review of the current knowledge towards an attempt to compare agents’ efficacy. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2024;14:96. [PMID: 37394893]
Wang Q et al. Efficacy and safety of anti-interleukin-5 therapies
in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2022;183:732. [PMID: 35108711]
Wu Q et al. Which is the best biologic for nasal polyps: dupilumab,
omalizumab, or mepolizumab? A network meta-analysis. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2022;183:279. [PMID: 34607329]
B. Inverted Papillomas
Inverted papillomas are benign tumors caused by HPV that usually arise on the lateral nasal wall. They present with unilateral nasal obstruction and occasionally hemorrhage. They are often easily seen on anterior rhinoscopy as cauli­flower-like growths in or around the middle meatus.
Because squamous cell carcinoma is seen in about 10% of inverted or schneiderian papillomas, complete excision is strongly recommended. This usually requires an endoscopic
medial maxillectomy. While rare, very extensive disease may require an open inferior or total maxillectomy for complete removal. Because recurrence rates for inverted papillomas are reported to be as high as 20%, subsequent clinical and radiologic follow-up is imperative. All excised tissue (not just a portion) should be carefully reviewed by the pathologist to be sure no carcinoma is present.
El-Adem D et al. The role of positron emission tomography for
the management of sinonasal malignancies: a systematic review. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2023;37:593. [PMID: 37229633]
Ferreli F et al. Association between human papillomavirus infec-
tion and malignant transformation of sinonasal inverted papilloma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Oto­laryngol. 2022;43:103614. [PMID: 36113312]
2. Malignant Nasopharyngeal & Paranasal Sinus Tumors
Though rare, malignant tumors of the nose, nasopharynx, and paranasal sinuses are quite problematic because they tend to remain asymptomatic until late in their course.
Squamous cell carcinoma is the most common cancer found in the sinuses and nasopharynx. It is especially common in
the nasopharynx, where it obstructs the eustachian tube and results in serous otitis media. Nasopharyngeal carci­noma (nonkeratinizing squamous cell carcinoma or lym­phoepithelioma) is usually associated with elevated IgA antibody to the viral capsid antigen of the Epstein-Barr
virus (EBV). It is particularly common in patients of south­ern Chinese descent and has a weaker association with tobacco exposure than other head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Adenocarcinomas, mucosal melanomas, sar­comas, and non-Hodgkin lymphomas are less commonly encountered neoplasms of this area.
Early symptoms are nonspecific, mimicking those of rhinitis or sinusitis. Unilateral nasal obstruction, otitis media, and discharge are common, with pain and recurrent hemor­rhage often clues to the diagnosis of cancer. All adults with
persistent unilateral nasal symptoms or new otitis media should be thoroughly evaluated with nasal endoscopy and nasopharyngoscopy. A high index of suspicion remains a key
to early diagnosis of these tumors. Patients often present with advanced symptoms, such as proptosis, expansion of a cheek, or ill-fitting maxillary dentures. Malar hypesthesia, due to involvement of the infraorbital nerve, is common in maxil­lary sinus tumors. Biopsy is necessary for definitive diagno­sis, and MRI is the best imaging study to delineate the extent of disease and plan appropriate surgery and radiation.
Treatment depends on the tumor type and the extent of disease. Early-stage disease may be treated with radiation therapy alone, but advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma is best treated with concurrent radiation and chemotherapy. Chemoradiation therapy significantly decreases local, nodal, and distant failures and increases progression-free and over­all survival in advanced disease. Locally recurrent nasopha­ryngeal carcinoma in selected cases may be treated with repeat irradiation protocols or surgery with moderate suc­cess and a high degree of concern about local wound heal­ing. Other squamous cell carcinomas are best treated—when resectable—with a combination of surgery and irradiation. Cranial base surgery, which can be done endoscopically using image navigation, appears to be an effective modality in improving the overall prognosis in paranasal sinus malig­nancies eroding the ethmoid roof. Although the prognosis is poor for advanced tumors, the results of treating resect­able tumors of paranasal sinus origin have improved with the wider use of skull base resections and intensity-modu­lated radiation therapy. Cure rates are often 45–60%.
Guven DC et al. Immunotherapy in the first-line treatment of
advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a systematic review and
meta-analysis. Laryngoscope. 2024;134:7. [PMID: 37227161]
Luo J et al. Efficacy and safety of PD-1 inhibitors in recurrent or
metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients after failure of
platinum-containing regimens: a systematic review and meta-
analysis. BMC Cancer. 2023;23:1172. [PMID: 38037076]
Masarwy R et al. Neoadjuvant PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors for resect-
able head and neck cancer: a systematic review and meta-
analysis. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2021;147:871.
[PMID: 34473219]
3. Sinonasal Inflammatory Disease (Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis & Sarcoidosis)
The nose and paranasal sinuses are involved in over 90% of cases of granulomatosis with polyangiitis. It is often not realized that involvement at these sites is more common than involvement of lungs or kidneys. Examination shows blood­stained crusts and friable mucosa. Biopsy, when positive, shows necrotizing granulomas and vasculitis. Other recognized
224 CMDT 2025
https://t.me/med1917
CHAPTER 8
sites of granulomatosis with polyangiitis in the head and neck include the subglottis and the middle ear. For treatment of granulomatosis with polyangiitis, see Chapter 22.
Sarcoidosis commonly involves the paranasal sinuses and is clinically similar to other chronic sinonasal inflam­matory processes. Sinonasal symptoms, including rhinor­rhea, nasal obstruction, and hyposmia or anosmia, may precede diagnosis of sarcoidosis in other organ systems. Clinically, the turbinates appear engorged with small white granulomas. Biopsy shows classic noncaseating granulomas. Notably, patients with sinonasal involvement generally have more trouble managing sarcoidosis in other organ systems.
Polymorphic reticulosis (midline malignant reticulo­sis, idiopathic midline destructive disease, lethal midline granuloma)—as the multitude of apt descriptive terms suggests—is not well understood but appears to be a nasal T-cell or NK-cell lymphoma. In contrast to granulomatosis with polyangiitis, involvement is limited to the mid-face, and there may be extensive bone destruction. Many destructive lesions of the mucosa and nasal structures labeled as polymorphic reticulosis are in fact non-Hodgkin lymphoma of either NK-cell or T-cell origin. Immunophe­notyping, especially for CD56 expression, is essential in the histologic evaluation. Even when apparently localized, these lymphomas have a poor prognosis, with progression and death within a year the rule.
Almuhanna A et al. Current therapeutic approaches to subglottic
stenosis in patients with GPA: a systematic review. Ear Nose
Throat J. 2024;103:117. [PMID: 34392732]
Guzman-Soto MI et al. From head to toe: granulomatosis with
polyangiitis. Radiographics. 2021;41:1973. [PMID: 34652975]
Pavlidis P et al. Morphological changes in nasal mucosa in
patients with sarcoidosis. Clin Otolaryngol. 2022;47:212.
[PMID: 34555266]
º
DISEASES OF THE ORAL CAVITY & PHARYNX
»
Oropharyngeal cancer: Masses arising from the throat (tonsils, base of tongue, soft palate, or pha­ryngeal wall) typically presenting with painful swallowing, persistent ear pain, and weight loss.
Leukoplakic regions range from small to several centimeters in diameter (Figure 8–5). Histologically, they are often hyperkeratoses occurring in response to chronic irritation (eg, from dentures, tobacco, lichen planus); about 2–6%, however, represent either dysplasia or early invasive squa­mous cell carcinoma. Distinguishing between leukoplakia
and erythroplakia is important because about 90% of cases of erythroplakia are either dysplasia or carcinoma. Squamous
cell carcinoma accounts for 90% of oral cancer. Alcohol and tobacco use are the major epidemiologic risk factors.
The differential diagnosis may include oral candidiasis, necrotizing sialometaplasia, pseudoepitheliomatous hyper­plasia, median rhomboid glossitis, and vesiculoerosive inflammatory disease, such as erosive lichen planus. This should not be confused with the brown-black gingival melanin pigmentation—diffuse or speckled—common in non-White persons, blue-black embedded fragments of dental amalgam, or other systemic disorders associated with general pigmentation (neurofibromatosis, familial polyposis, Addison disease). Intraoral melanoma is extremely rare and carries a dismal prognosis.
Any area of erythroplakia, enlarging area of leukopla­kia, or a lesion that has submucosal depth on palpation or irregular appearance associated with pain or other symp­toms should have an incisional. Ulcerative lesions are par­ticularly suspicious and worrisome. Specialty referral should be sought early both for diagnosis and treatment. A systematic intraoral examination—including the lateral tongue, floor of the mouth, gingiva, buccal area, palate, and tonsillar fossae—and palpation of the neck for enlarged lymph nodes should be part of any general physical exami­nation. Patients with current or former tobacco use or
LEUKOPLAKIA, ERYTHROPLAKIA, LICHEN PLANUS, & OROPHARYNGEAL CANCER
ESSENTIALS OF DIAGNOSIS
»
Leukoplakia: A white plaque-like lesion that can­not be removed by rubbing the mucosal surface.
»
Erythroplakia: Similar to leukoplakia except that it has a definite erythematous component.
»
Oral lichen planus: Most commonly presents as lacy leukoplakia but may be erosive; definitive diagnosis requires biopsy.
»
Oral cancer: Early lesions appear as leukoplakia or erythroplakia; more advanced lesions will be larger, painful, and can involve the tongue, gums, hard palate, inner lining of the lips or cheek. Ulcer­ation may be present.
Figure 8–5. Leukoplakia with moderate dysplasia on
the lateral border of the tongue. (Used, with permission, from Ellen Eisenberg, DMD, in Usatine RP, Smith MA, Mayeaux EJ Jr, Chumley H. The Color Atlas of Family Medi- cine, 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill, 2013.)
OTOLARYNGOLOGY DISORDERS
https://t.me/med1917
moderate alcohol drinking history are at higher risk of malignancy. Indirect or fiberoptic examination of the naso­pharynx, oropharynx, hypopharynx, and larynx by an otolaryngologist, head and neck surgeon should be consid­ered for such patients when there is unexplained or persis­tent throat or ear pain, oral or nasal bleeding, or oral erythroplakia. Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy may expedite the diagnosis if an enlarged lymph node is found.
To date, there remain no approved therapies for revers­ing or stabilizing leukoplakia or erythroplakia. Clinical trials have suggested a role for beta-carotene, celecoxib, vitamin E, injection of local chemotherapeutics such as 5-fluorouracil, and retinoids in producing regression of leukoplakia and reducing the incidence of recurrent squa­mous cell carcinomas. None have demonstrated benefit in large studies and these agents are not in general use today. The mainstays of management are surveillance following elimination of carcinogenic irritants (eg, smoking tobacco, chewing tobacco or betel nut, drinking alcohol) along with serial biopsies and excisions.
Oral lichen planus is a relatively common (0.5–2% of the population) chronic inflammatory autoimmune dis­ease that may be difficult to diagnose clinically because of its numerous distinct phenotypic subtypes. For example, the reticular pattern may mimic candidiasis or hyperkera­tosis, while the erosive pattern may mimic squamous cell carcinoma. Management begins with distinguishing it from other oral lesions. Exfoliative cytology or a small incisional or excisional biopsy is indicated, especially if squamous cell carcinoma is suspected. Therapy of lichen planus is aimed at managing pain and discomfort. Daily topical corticosteroid remains the most effective treatment for symptomatic lichen planus, but cyclosporine, retinoids, and tacrolimus have also been used. Many experts think there is a low rate (1%) of squamous cell carcinoma arising within lichen planus (in addition to the possibility of clini­cal misdiagnosis) and prevention of malignant transforma­tion remains a goal of treatment.
Hairy leukoplakia occurs on the lateral border of the tongue and is a common early finding in HIV infection (see Chapter 33). It often develops quickly and appears as slightly raised leukoplakic areas with a corrugated or “hairy” surface (Figure 8–6). While much more prevalent in patients with HIV, hairy leukoplakia can occur following solid organ transplantation and is associated with EBV infection and long-term systemic corticosteroid use. Hairy leukoplakia waxes and wanes over time with generally modest irritative symptoms. Acyclovir, valacyclovir, and famciclovir have all been used for treatment but produce only temporary resolution of the condition. It does not appear to predispose to malignant transformation.
Oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma can be hard to distinguish from other oral lesions, but early detection is the key to successful management (Figure 8–7). Raised, firm, ulcerative lesions are highly suspicious and generally quite painful on even gentle palpation. Lesions less than 3 mm in depth have a low propensity to metastasize. Most patients in whom the tumor is detected before it is 2 cm in diameter are cured by local resection. Radiation is reserved for patients with metastatic disease or tumors with adverse
CMDT 2025
Figure 8–6. Oral hairy leukoplakia on the side of the
tongue in AIDS. (Reproduced with permission from Richard P. Usatine, MD, in Usatine RP, Smith MA, Mayeaux EJ Jr, Chumley H. The Color Atlas of Family Medicine, 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill, 2013.)
features, and chemotherapy is added if there are positive margins or if involved lymph nodes have extranodal exten­sion. Large tumors are usually treated with a combination of resection, removal of lymph nodes from the neck (neck dissection), and external beam radiation. Reconstruction, if required, is done at the time of resection and can involve the use of myocutaneous flaps or vascularized free tissue transfer with or without bone. Novel fluorescence-guided surgeries are being developed to improve detection of mar­gins and decrease recurrence.
Oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma generally presents later than oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma. The lesions tend to be larger and are often buried within the lymphoid tissue of the palatine or lingual tonsils. Most patients note only unilateral odynophagia and weight loss,
Figure 8–7. Squamous cell carcinoma of the palate.
(Used, with permission, from Frank Miller, MD, in Usatine RP, Smith MA, Mayeaux EJ Jr, Chumley H. The Color Atlas of Family Medicine, 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill, 2013.)
225
226 CMDT 2025
https://t.me/med1917
CHAPTER 8
but ipsilateral cervical lymphadenopathy is often identified by the careful clinician. While these tumors are typically associated with known carcinogens such as tobacco and alcohol, their epidemiology has changed dramatically over the past 25 years. Despite demonstrated reductions in tobacco and alcohol use within developed nations, the incidence of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma has increased over this period. Known as a possible cause of head and neck cancer since 1983, HPV—most commonly,
type 16/18—is believed to be the cause of up to 70% of all oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. HPV-positive
tumors are readily distinguished by immunostaining of primary tumor or FNA biopsy specimens for the p16 pro­tein, a tumor suppressor protein that is highly correlated with the presence of HPV. These tumors often present in advanced stages of the disease with regional cervical lymph node metastases (stages III and IV) but have a better prog­nosis than similarly staged lesions in tobacco and alcohol users. This difference in disease control is so apparent in multicenter studies that, based on the presence or absence of the p16 protein, two distinct staging systems for oropha­ryngeal squamous cell carcinoma were introduced in 2018.
Pal R et al. Fluorescence lifetime of injected indocyanine green
as a universal marker of solid tumours in patients. Nat Biomed Eng. 2023;7:1649. [PMID: 37845517]
Worthington HV et al. Interventions for the treatment of oral
cavity and oropharyngeal cancers: surgical treatment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023;8:CD006205. [PMID: 37650478]
ORAL CANDIDIASIS
ESSENTIALS OF DIAGNOSIS
Figure 8–8. Severe angular cheilitis in a man with
HIV with oral thrush. (Reproduced with permission from Richard P. Usatine, MD, in Usatine RP, Smith MA, Mayeaux EJ Jr, Chumley H. The Color Atlas of Family Medicine, 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill, 2013.)
is angular cheilitis (also seen in nutritional deficiencies) (Figure 8–8).
B. Diagnostic Studies
The diagnosis is made clinically. A wet preparation using potassium hydroxide will reveal spores and may show non­septate mycelia. Biopsy will show intraepithelial pseudo­mycelia of Candida albicans.
Candidiasis is often the first manifestation of HIV infec-
tion, and HIV testing should be considered in patients with no
known predisposing cause for Candida overgrowth (see also Chapter 33). The US Department of Health Services Clinical Practice Guideline for Evaluation and Management of Early HIV Infection recommends examination of the oral mucosa with each clinician visit as well as at a dental examination every 6 months for individuals living with HIV.
»
Fluctuating throat or mouth discomfort.
»
Associated with systemic or local immunosup­pression, such as recent corticosteroid, chemo­therapy, or antibiotic use.
»
Erythema of the oral cavity or oropharynx with creamy-white, curd-like patches.
»
Rapid resolution of symptoms with appropriate treatment.
» Clinical Findings
A. Symptoms and Signs
Oral candidiasis (thrush) is usually painful and looks like creamy-white curd-like patches overlying erythematous mucosa (see Figure 6–11). Because these white areas are easily rubbed off (eg, by a tongue depressor)—unlike leuko­plakia or lichen planus—only the underlying irregular erythema may be seen. Oral candidiasis is commonly asso­ciated with the following risk factors: (1) use of dentures, (2) debilitated state with poor oral hygiene, (3) diabetes mellitus, (4) anemia, (5) chemotherapy or local irradiation, (6) corticosteroid use (oral or systemic), or (7) broad­spectrum antibiotics. Another manifestation of candidiasis
» Treatment
Effective antifungal therapy may be achieved with any of the following: fluconazole (100 mg orally daily for 7 days), keto­conazole (200–400 mg orally with breakfast [requires acidic gastric environment for absorption] for 7–14 days), clotrim­azole troches (10 mg dissolved orally five times daily), or nystatin mouth rinses (500,000 units [5 mL of 100,000 units/ mL] held in the mouth before swallowing three times daily). In patients with HIV infection, however, longer courses of therapy with fluconazole may be needed, and oral itracon­azole (200 mg/day) may be indicated in fluconazole-refrac­tory cases. Many of the Candida species in these patients are resistant to first-line azoles and may require newer medica­tions, such as voriconazole. In addition, 0.12% chlorhexi­dine or half-strength hydrogen peroxide mouth rinses may provide local relief. Nystatin powder (100,000 units/g) applied to dentures three or four times daily and rinsed off for several weeks may help denture wearers.
Fang J et al. Efficacy of antifungal drugs in the treatment of oral
candidiasis: a Bayesian network meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2020:S0022-3913(20)30076. [PMID: 32165010]
Vila T et al. Oral candidiasis: a disease of opportunity. J Fungi
(Basel). 2020;16;6:15. [PMID: 31963180]
OTOLARYNGOLOGY DISORDERS
https://t.me/med1917
CMDT 2025
227
GLOSSITIS, GLOSSODYNIA, & BURNING MOUTH SYNDROME
Inflammation of the tongue with loss of filiform papillae leads to a red, smooth-surfaced tongue (glossitis). Rarely painful, it may be secondary to nutritional deficiencies (eg, niacin, riboflavin, iron, or vitamin E), drug reactions, dehydration, irritants, or foods and liquids, and possibly to autoimmune reactions or psoriasis. If the primary cause cannot be identified and corrected, empiric nutritional replacement therapy may be of value.
Glossodynia is burning and pain of the tongue, which may occur with or without glossitis. In the absence of any clinical findings, it has been termed “burning mouth syndrome.” Glossodynia with glossitis has been associated with diabetes mellitus, medications (eg, diuretics), tobacco, xerostomia, and candidiasis as well as the listed causes of glossitis. The burning mouth syn­drome typically has no identifiable associated risk factors and seems to be most common in postmenopausal women. Treating possible underlying causes, changing long-term medications to alternative ones, and smoking cessation may resolve symptoms of glossitis. Effective treatments for the burning mouth syndrome include alpha-lipoic acid and clonazepam. Clonazepam is most effective as a rapid-dissolving tablet placed on the tongue in doses from 0.25 mg to 0.5 mg every 8–12 hours. Both glossodynia and the burning mouth syndrome are benign, and reassurance that there is no infection or tumor is likely to be appreciated. Unilateral symptoms, symptoms that cannot be related to a specific medica­tion, and symptoms and signs involving regions supplied by other cranial nerves all may suggest neuropathology, and imaging of the brain, brainstem, and skull base with MRI should be considered.
Alvarenga-Brant R et al. Treatments for burning mouth syn-
drome: a network meta-analysis. J Dent Res. 2023;102:135.
[PMID: 36214096]
de Lima-Souza RA et al. Clinical and epidemiological profile of
burning mouth syndrome patients following the Interna-
tional Headache Society classification: a systematic review
and meta-analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral
Radiol. 2023:S2212-4403(23)00684-3. [PMID: 38155008]
INTRAORAL ULCERATIVE LESIONS
1. Necrotizing Ulcerative Gingivitis (Trench Mouth, Vincent Angina)
Necrotizing ulcerative gingivitis, often caused by an infec­tion with both spirochetes and fusiform bacilli, is common in young adults under stress (classically in students at examination time). Underlying systemic diseases may also predispose to this disorder. Clinically, there is painful acute gingival inflammation and necrosis, often with bleeding, halitosis, fever, and cervical lymphadenopathy. Warm half­strength peroxide rinses and oral penicillin (250 mg three times daily for 10 days) may help. Dental gingival curettage may prove necessary.
Salgado-Peralvo AO et al. Prevalence of aphthous stomatitis in
patients with inflammatory bowel disease after the treatment with monoclonal antibodies: a systematic review and meta­analysis. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2022;27:e588. [PMID: 36173720]
Schroeder FMM et al. Clinical and immunological features of
chronic ulcerative stomatitis: a systematic review. J Oral Pathol Med. 2022;51:501. [PMID: 35092104]
2. Aphthous Ulcer (Canker Sore, Ulcerative Stomatitis)
Aphthous ulcers are very common and easy to recognize. Their cause remains uncertain, although an association with human herpesvirus 6 has been suggested. Found on freely moving, nonkeratinized mucosa (eg, buccal and labial mucosa and not attached gingiva or palate), they may be single or multiple, are usually recurrent, and appear as painful small round ulcerations with yellow-gray fibrinoid centers surrounded by red halos. Minor aphthous ulcers are less than 1 cm in diameter and generally heal in 10–14 days. Major aphthous ulcers are greater than 1 cm in diameter and can be disabling due to the degree of associ­ated oral pain. Stress seems to be a major predisposing factor to the eruptions of aphthous ulcers.
Treatment is challenging because no single systemic treatment has proven effective. Avoiding local irritants, such as certain toothpastes, may decrease symptoms and episodes. Topical corticosteroids (triamcinolone acetonide,
0.1%, or fluocinonide ointment, 0.05%) in an adhesive base (Orabase Plain) do appear to provide symptomatic relief in many patients. Other topical therapies shown to be effec­tive in controlled studies include diclofenac 3% in hyaluro­nan 2.5%, doxymycine-cyanoacrylate, mouthwashes containing the enzymes amyloglucosidase and glucose oxidase, and amlexanox 5% oral paste. A 1-week tapering course of prednisone (40–60 mg/day) has also been used successfully. Cimetidine maintenance therapy may be use­ful in patients with recurrent aphthous ulcers. Thalidomide has been used selectively in recurrent aphthous ulcerations in patients with HIV.
Large or persistent areas of ulcerative stomatitis may be secondary to erythema multiforme or drug allergies, acute herpes simplex, pemphigus, pemphigoid, epidermolysis bullosa acquisita, bullous lichen planus, Behçet disease, or IBD. Squamous cell carcinoma may occasionally present in this fashion. When the diagnosis is not clear, incisional biopsy is indicated.
Chaitanya N et al. Efficacy of improvised topical zinc (1%) ora-
base on oral mucositis during cancer chemo-radiation—a
randomized study. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol (Tokyo). 2020;66:93.
[PMID: 32350185]
Philipone EM et al. Ulcerative and inflammatory lesions of the
oral mucosa. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am.
2023;35:219. [PMID: 36805903]
3. Herpes Stomatitis
Herpes gingivostomatitis is common, mild, and short­lived. Clinically, there is initial burning, followed by typical small vesicles that rupture and form scabs. Lesions are
228 CMDT 2025
https://t.me/med1917
CHAPTER 8
most commonly found on the attached gingiva and muco­cutaneous junction of the lip, but lesions can also form on the tongue, buccal mucosa, and soft palate. In most adults, it requires no intervention. In immunocompromised per­sons, however, reactivation of herpes simplex virus infec­tion is frequent and may be severe. Acyclovir (200–800 mg orally five times daily for 7–10 days) or valacyclovir (1000 mg orally twice daily for 7–10 days) may shorten the course and reduce postherpetic pain. These treatments may be
effective only when started within 24–48 hours of the onset of initial symptoms (pain, itching, burning) and are not effec­tive once vesicles have erupted. Differential diagnosis
includes aphthous stomatitis, erythema multiforme, syphi­litic chancre, and carcinoma.
Barros AWP et al. Is low-level laser therapy effective in the treat-
ment of herpes labialis? Systematic review and meta-analysis. Lasers Med Sci. 2022;37:3393. [PMID: 36214942]
Coppola N et al. Supportive care and antiviral treatments in
primary herpetic gingivostomatitis: a systematic review. Clin Oral Investig. 2023;27:6333. [PMID: 37733027]
Khalil M et al. Association of photodynamic therapy and
photobiomodulation as a promising treatment of herpes labialis: a systematic review. Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg. 2022;40:299. [PMID: 35483089]
PHARYNGITIS & TONSILLITIS
ESSENTIALS OF DIAGNOSIS
»
Centor criteria for streptococcal pharyngitis: exudate or swelling on tonsils, anterior cervical adenopathy, fever, lack of cough.
»
Goal is to treat group A beta-hemolytic strepto­coccal infection to prevent subsequent rheumatic fever (rash, arthralgias, myocarditis) and other sequelae (glomerulonephritis, posterior pharyn­geal abscess).
» General Considerations
Pharyngitis and tonsillitis account for over 10% of all office visits to primary care clinicians and 50% of outpatient anti­biotic use. The main concern is determining who is likely to
have a group A beta-hemolytic streptococcal (GABHS) infection, since this can lead to subsequent complications,
such as rheumatic fever and glomerulonephritis. A second public health policy concern is reducing the extraordinary cost (both in dollars and in the development of antibiotic­resistant S pneumoniae) associated with unnecessary anti­biotic use.
» Clinical Findings
A. Symptoms and Signs
The clinical features most suggestive of GABHS pharyngi­tis include fever over 38°C, tender anterior cervical ade­nopathy, lack of a cough, and pharyngotonsillar exudate (Figure 8–9). These four features (the Centor criteria),
Figure 8–9. Marked exudative pharyngitis and ton-
sillitis due to group A beta-hemolytic streptococci.
(Used, with permission, from Lawrence B. Stack, MD, in Knoop KJ, Stack LB, Storrow AB, Thurman RJ. The Atlas of Emergency Medicine, 5th ed. McGraw Hill, 2021.)
when present, strongly suggest GABHS. When two or three of the four are present, there is an intermediate likelihood of GABHS. When only one criterion is present, GABHS is unlikely. Sore throat may be severe, with odynophagia, tender adenopathy, and a scarlatiniform rash. An elevated white count and left shift are also possible. Hoarseness, cough, and coryza are not suggestive of this disease. It is also rare to have GABHS in individuals younger than 3 years old.
Marked lymphadenopathy and a shaggy, white-purple tonsillar exudate, often extending into the nasopharynx, suggest mononucleosis, especially if present in a young adult. With about 90% sensitivity, lymphocyte-to-white­blood-cell ratios of greater than 35% suggest EBV infection and not tonsillitis. Hepatosplenomegaly and a positive heterophile agglutination test or elevated anti-EBV titer are corroborative. However, about one-third of patients with infectious mononucleosis have secondary streptococcal tonsillitis, requiring treatment. Ampicillin should routinely be avoided if mononucleosis is suspected because it induces a rash that might be misinterpreted by the patient as a penicillin allergy. Diphtheria (extremely rare but described in persons with alcohol use disorder) presents with low­grade fever and an ill patient with a gray tonsillar pseudomembrane.
The most common pathogens other than GABHS in the differential diagnosis of “sore throat” are viruses, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Mycoplasma, and Chlamydia trachomatis. Rhinorrhea and lack of exudate would suggest a virus, but in practice it is not possible to confidently distinguish viral upper respiratory infection from GABHS on clinical grounds alone. Infections with Corynebacterium diphthe-
ria, anaerobic streptococci, and Corynebacterium haemo­lyticum (which responds better to erythromycin than
penicillin) may also mimic pharyngitis due to GABHS. See also Chapter 35 for bacterial considerations.
B. Laboratory Findings
A single-swab throat culture is 90–95% sensitive and the rapid antigen detection testing (RADT) is 90–99% sensitive