Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_2638_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
53 Мб
Скачать
292  I NFE C TI O US D IS E ASE
https://t.me/medicina_free
stool samples. Immunity develops to natural infection. Monovalent and multivalent vaccines have been licensed in many countries and have now demonstrated efcacy in large trials in Africa and the Americas.
Hepatitis viruses (A–E)
See Chapter 24
Other viruses
Adenoviruses are frequently identied from stool culture and implicated as a cause of diarrhoea in children. They have also been linked to cases of intussusception.
Respiratory viral infections
Fig. 13.16 Electron micrograph of molluscum contagiosum, a poxvirus. Courtesy
of Prof. Goura Kudesia, Northern General Hospital, Shefeld.
Cowpox
Humans in contact with infected cows develop large vesicles, usually on the hands or arms and associated with fever and regional lymphadenitis. The reservoir is thought to be wild rodents.
Vaccinia virus
This laboratory strain is used as the smallpox vaccine. Widespread vaccination is no longer recommended due to the likelihood of local spread from the vaccination site (potentially life-threatening in those with eczema (eczema vaccinatum) or immune deciency) and of encephalitis. However, vaccination may still be recommended for key medical staff.
Other poxviruses: orf and molluscum contagiosum
See page 1091 and Figure 13.16
Gastrointestinal viral infections
Norovirus
Norovirus is the most common UK cause of infectious gastroenter­itis and causes outbreaks in hospital wards, cruise ships and mili­tary camps. Food handlers may transmit this virus, which is relatively resistant to decontamination procedures. The incubation period is 24–48 hours. High attack rates and prominent vomiting are character­istic. Diagnosis may be achieved by antigen or DNA detection (PCR) in stool samples, although the characteristic clinical and epidemiological features mean that microbiological conrmation is not always neces­sary. The virus is highly infectious and cases should be isolated and environmental surfaces cleaned with detergents and disinfected with bleach.
Astrovirus
Astroviruses cause diarrhoea in small children and occasionally in immu­nocompromised adults.
Rotavirus
Rotaviruses infect enterocytes and are a major cause of diarrhoeal illness in young children worldwide. Winter epidemics are common in high-in­come countries, particularly in nurseries. Adults in close contact with cases may develop disease. The incubation period is 48  hours and patients present with watery diarrhoea, vomiting, fever and abdominal pain. Dehydration is prominent. Diagnosis is aided by commercially available enzyme immunoassay kits, which require fresh or refrigerated
These infections are described further on page 512.
Adenoviruses, rhinoviruses and enteroviruses (coxsackieviruses
and echoviruses) often produce non-specic upper respiratory tract symptoms but may cause viral pneumonia. Parainuenza and respira­tory syncytial viruses cause upper respiratory tract disease, croup and bronchiolitis in small children and pneumonia in the immunocompro­mised. Respiratory syncytial virus also causes pneumonia in nursing home residents and may be associated with nosocomial pneumonia. Metapneumovirus and bocavirus cause upper and occasionally lower respiratory tract infection, especially in immunosuppressed individuals.
Coronaviruses
Coronaviruses are single-strand positive-sense RNA viruses that cause widespread infection in animals and humans.
Coronaviruses HCoV-229E, HCoV-NL63, HCoVH-KU1 and
HCoV-OC43 have a worldwide distribution. They usually cause mild upper respiratory tract infection, but occasionally more serious respira­tory infection at extremes of age or in immunocompromised hosts.
Three coronaviruses have emerged in recent years that cause more
serious infections. These are SARS-CoV (severe acute respiratory syn­drome coronavirus), MERS-CoV (Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus) and SARS-CoV-2 (the cause of coronavirus disease 2019; COVID-19). These coronaviruses have emerged as zoonoses from bats and potentially intermediate hosts. The intermediate hosts for SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV include palm civets and camels respectively, but the identity of the intermediate host(s) for SARS-CoV-2 remains elusive.
It has been suggested that both SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 may
have been spread to humans through contact with wild animals in wild food markets.
Pathogenesis
The coronaviruses contain non-structural proteins including RNA­polymerases and proteases and structural proteins including the envelope, spike (S) glycoprotein and nucleocapsid protein. RNA replication occurs in double membrane vesicles originating from the endoplasmic reticulum and is incorporated into virions which are released from infected cells. The corona­viruses infect a range of cells, including respiratory and gastrointestinal epi­thelial cells. Initial interactions involve the S glycoprotein, which binds to the surface receptor. For SARS, SARS-CoV-2 and HCoV-NL63 the receptor is the human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (hACE2). Infection with SARS­CoV-2 results in reduced expression of hACE2, a protein that normally plays important anti-inammatory roles in the lung, and it is thought that reduced expression may contribute to pathogenesis. In SARS-CoV-2 infection the S glycoprotein requires priming by the human serine protease TMPRSS2 to allow optimal engagement with its receptor, hACE2. For MERS-CoV the receptor is the dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4). The receptor-binding domain of the S glycoprotein undergoes mutation to allow adaptation dur­ing cross-species transmission from bats to other species, including man.
Coronaviruses induce suboptimal early interferon responses,
in part thought to be because the RNA is shielded from pattern
Vi ra l i nf ec t io ns  293
https://t.me/medicina_free
recognition receptors, since it is contained in the double membrane ves­icles. Furthermore, several coronaviruses contain a nucleocapsid pro­tein that suppresses interferon production. However, despite suppression of interferon in some cells, other cells such as macrophages and dendritic cells do produce interferon, and excessive production of interferon and other pro-inammatory cytokines by these cells is associated with failure to clear virus and poor outcomes. Antiviral immunity requires production of neutral­ising antibody and effective CD4
antiviral responses, however, also appear to cause tissue injury. In SARS­CoV and SARS-CoV-2 infection pulmonary complications typically emerge after 1–2 weeks and are thought to result from dysregulation of innate and adaptive immune responses. For SARS-CoV-2 it is suggested that subopti­mal innate immune responses and recruitment of pro-inammatory CCR2
monocytes contribute to inammation, while apoptotic cell death of CD8 T-cells is prominent. Disease is more severe in older individuals and it is thought this may correlate with suboptimal T-cell responses and enhanced pro-inammatory responses with ageing. Skewing of immune responses away from early protective interferon responses and suboptimal antivi­ral immunity may lead to dysregulated immune responses and prolonged inammatory responses that lead to tissue injury in multiple organs. For SARS-CoV-2, activation of the clotting cascade in association with marked inammation appears to be a distinct feature. Microthrombi occur around the body and both venous thromboembolism and arterial clots in the heart and brain may be prominent features.
+
and CD8
+
T-cell responses. These same
SARS coronavirus (SARS-CoV)
SARS-CoV emerged as a major respiratory pathogen during an outbreak of SARS in 2002–2003, in which there were approximately 8000 cases. The virus originated in Guangdong, China, and spread to several other countries, with secondary transmission reported in Canada (Toronto), Hong Kong, Taiwan, Singapore and Vietnam during the outbreak. SARS presented as a u-like illness with non-specic symptoms, including fever, malaise, myalgia, headache, diarrhoea and shivering. In severe cases these progressed to pneumonia, requiring intensive care admis­sion. The case fatality rate was approximately 11%.
According to the World Health Organization, SARS infection has been recorded only four times since the global epidemic, three times from lab­oratory accidents and once in southern China from an unknown source.
Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV)
In 2012, a novel coronavirus, distantly related to SARS-CoV, caused several deaths connected with pneumonia in patients originating from the Middle East. The Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) appears to be a zoonosis, involving transmission from bats to camels and then to humans. Over 20 countries have reported cases, although most cases have a history of travel to Saudi Arabia or other countries in the Arabian Peninsula. By 2020 there had been over 2500 reported cases. MERS-CoV remains an important but still geographically restricted coronavirus.
Clinical features
The incubation period in person-to-person transmission is 2–14 (average
5) days. Any age may be infected but the patients over 50 with med­ical comorbidities are particularly susceptible to severe disease. Initial symptoms are fever, chills, headache, myalgia, dry cough and dyspnoea. Abdominal pain and diarrhoea may be prominent. The mean period from symptom onset to hospitalisation is 4 days, and 5 days to intensive care unit admission. Illness is complicated by rapid development of respiratory failure and features of ARDS and multi-organ failure. Mortality is 35%.
Diagnosis and management
Laboratory features include lymphopenia, thrombocytopenia and raised lactate dehydrogenase (LDH). Diagnosis is conrmed by detection of virus RNA (PCR) in serum, nasopharyngeal or other respiratory sam­ples. Antibody detection may also be useful. Treatment is supportive.
Strict infection control measures should be implemented for anyone with fever, severe respiratory illness and epidemiological risk factors. Patients should be managed in an airborne infection isolation room with contact and airborne infection control measures, including personal protective equipment for health-care workers.
SARS-CoV-2
SARS-CoV-2 was rst identied in December 2019 in Wuhan, China, where it caused an outbreak that spread rapidly to other parts of China and then the rest of the world. The virus is believed to have been trans­mitted to humans via horseshoe bats (Rhinolophus sinicus) and poten-
+
tially other intermediate hosts, to whom individuals may have been
+
exposed at wild food markets.
SARS-CoV-2 appears to be more easily transmissible than SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV. Consequently, early efforts to contain the virus were unsuccessful and it spread rapidly. The earliest secondary outbreaks were identied in Iran, Italy and Spain, but most of the world was affected within a few weeks (Fig. 13.17). The World Health Organization declared COVID- 19 to be a global pandemic in March 2020, just 3 months after it was rst identied in China. By late 2020 new variants had emerged carrying several amino acid substitutions. As the virus mutates variants of interest and variants of concern have been identied to aid public health measures to monitor transmission and research. The nomenclature of new variants developed alongside the pandemic. The variants were initially assigned ‘Pango’ lineage codes (letters and numbers) or identied with designations associated with clade (GISAID or Nexstrain), although as these were dif­cult for the public to use the variants tended to be referred to according to the geographic location where they were rst identied, e.g. B1.1.7 (‘Kent’, United Kingdom), B1.351 (South Africa) and P.1 (Brazil). In May 2021, to both simplify the nomenclature and avoid the pejorative connotations of geographic associations, the WHO started to assign Greek characters to the variants, and these strains were named Alpha (e.g. B1.1.7), Beta (e.g. B1.351), Gamma (e.g. P.1) and Delta (e.g. B1.617.2). The Greek let­ter names are designed to facilitate discussion in non-scientic audiences and do not replace the scientic names. The variants have higher R num­bers than the native virus and are more transmissible due to mutations in the receptor-binding domain of the S protein, such as the replacement of asparagine with tyrosine at amino acid position 501 (N501Y). B1.1.7 (Alpha) was found to cause increased mortality compared to previous SARS-CoV-2 strains in several studies. Mutation may also modify inter­actions with antibody, as suggested for the E484K mutation (where a glu­tamic acid residue is replaced by lysine) found in the Beta and Gamma variants. The highly transmissible B1.617.2 (Delta) variant emerged in December 2020 causing a ‘2nd wave’ in India before spreading across the world. The pattern was repeated in November 2021 with the B.1.1.529 (Omicron) variant, rst reported in South Africa. However, Omicron tended to cause disease of less severity than earlier variants, presumably because of a combination of altered virulence factors and herd immunity from vac­cination and natural infection.
As well as exhibiting differences in transmissibility, symptomatol­ogy and case-fatality, infection by the variants is prevented to different extents by the separate COVID-19 vaccines available. For example, the Delta variant was found to have a greater propensity to infect individu­als who had received only single doses of vaccines, most of which are designed to be given as a two-dose ‘course’; and the Omicron variant had a propensity to infect people who were fully vaccinated but had not had ‘booster’ doses. SARS-CoV-2 is therefore very much a ‘moving target’ with respect to disease prevention strategies.
Responses to control the pandemic
The rapid emergence and exponential increase in COVID-19 case numbers as the pandemic developed raised signicant challenges to the control of its transmission in both health-care settings and the wider community. Particular infection prevention and control (IPC) challenges raised by the pandemic included the rapid depletion of personal protective equipment (PPE), the lag between the spread of
13
294  I NFE C TI O US D IS E ASE
https://t.me/medicina_free
January 2020
A
February 2020
Number of confirmed cases by area
1–2
3–20
31–100
>100
Country, area or territory with cases
Fig. 13.17 Global spread of COVID-19 in 2020.
of COVID-19 from late January with an epicentre in China to foci in Asia and Europe in late February, with more widespread cases
shown in July 2020. Redrawn with permission from WHO
B
Number of confirmed cases by area
1–2 3–10 11–100 101–500
501–5000
<5000
Country, area or territory with cases
March 2020
Number of confirmed cases
1–10 11–100 101–1000 1001–5 000
5001–10 000
10001–30 000
<30000 Country, area or territory
with cases
1–100 101–1000 1001– 10 000 10001–100 000 >100000 No cases reported in the last 7 days No reported cases
13.36 Infection prevention and control strategies used for COVID-19 in the health-care setting*
https://t.me/medicina_free
Vi ra l i nf ec t io ns  295
‘Standard’ precautions
Transmission-based precautions
Isolation, cohorting and quarantining
Screening
Visitor restriction
Contact tracing
*Infection prevention and control measures vary with time, in different countries and according to resource availability.
infection and the acquisition of evidence required to inform IPC pre­cautions to control its spread, the requirement by health-care provid­ers to implement frequent changes in IPC guidance in response to the availability of PPE, and huge uctuations in case numbers as the peri­odic introduction and relaxation of population-based control measures brought about ‘waves’ of infection, which had the potential to repeat­edly overwhelm the ability of health services to function effectively.
Infection prevention and control in health-care settings
SARS-CoV-2 is acquired predominantly from the oropharyngeal and respiratory secretions of infected patients. Respiratory transmission has traditionally been categorized into ‘airborne’ (or ‘aerosol’) and ‘droplet’ spread, which are distinguished by the size of respiratory particles in which viable organisms are carried, with a cut-off size of 5 μm. The theo- retical basis for the distinction is that particles of 5–10 μm diameter (‘res­piratory droplets’) tend to fall out of the air soon after being produced. They are therefore unlikely to travel more than 1 m or so from the source patient and are transmitted mainly by settling on mucous membranes (direct transmission) or by being transported to mucous membranes via fomites (indirect transmission). Conversely, particles of <5 μm (‘droplet nuclei’) can remain suspended in the air for prolonged periods of time and can therefore travel longer distances and be taken into air passages by inhalation. In reality, both the size of respiratory particles produced by an infected person and the distance they can travel is likely to fall on a spectrum. The range of particle sizes will be affected by factors such as the speed of the passage of air across the infected person’s respira­tory tract mucous membranes, the volume and character of secretions being produced and the extent to which droplets are converted to drop­let nuclei by evaporation; and the duration of airborne suspension and distance travelled will be inuenced by environmental factors such as temperature, humidity and prevailing air currents. Therefore, the distinc­tion between airborne/aerosol and droplet transmission is not absolute, and different precautions may be required for the same infection in dif­ferent circumstances.
SARS-CoV-2 is believed to be predominantly transmitted by droplet spread in most circumstances (e.g. when an infected patient is breathing rapidly or coughing) but can be transmitted by the airborne route when the patient is subjected to an ‘aerosol-generating procedure’ (AGP). AGPs include (but are not limited to) tracheal intubation, manual ventila­tion, non-invasive ventilation and the use of certain high ow oxygenation treaments. For this reason, in the UK (at the time of writing) ‘droplet’
Hand hygieneUse of personal protective equipment (PPE), e.g. masks, gloves, aprons, gowns and eye protection, according to the
clinical circumstances
Spillage, sharps, laundry and clinical waste managementEnvironmental cleaning and disinfection
A combination of airborne, contact and droplet precautions (see Box 6.9) with airborne precautions often reserved for
situations in which aerosol-generating procedures (AGPs) are carried out
Different precautions may be applied depending on the level of patient risk (e.g. conrmed vs. suspected COVID-19)
Isolation or cohorting to minimise the risk of onward transmission (cohorting should be reserved for conrmed cases, or
it carries the risk of uninfected patients being exposed to infected patients)
Quarantining patients prior to elective proceduresQuarantining staff who test positive for SARS-CoV-2
Admission screening to identify asymptomatic infected patientsInterval screening of inpatients to identify and prevent health care-acquired COVID-19Pre-procedure screening for patients having elective proceduresStaff screening to identify asymptomatic infected staff
To minimise the possibility of uninfected patients being infected by visitors, and vice versa
Detection (and subsequent isolation) of uninfected patients who have been exposed to infected patients (e.g. in a bay/
hospital ward) and staff
precautions are considered adequate for the management of patients with COVID-19 (and other infections transmitted in a similar manner, such as inuenza) in most circumstances, but ‘airborne’ precautions are used when an infected (or suspected) patient is subjected to an AGP. Unfortunately, the evidence-base for the distinction between airborne and droplet transmission in any given circumstance is weak and subject to repeated interpretation, so precautions used for COVID-19 tend to vary with time and geographical location.
The control of COVID-19 in health-care settings therefore requires a
combination of measures, as shown in Box 13.36
Public health measures
A major strategy for limiting spread of SARS-CoV-2 has been the intro­duction of physical distancing measures, the most extreme of which have been termed ‘lockdowns’. The components and restrictiveness of lock­downs vary between countries, but they have typically included: the closure of schools, workplaces, non-essential shops, sporting and entertainment venues; a move to remote (i.e. computer- based) working where possible; banning mass gatherings; curfews; stay-at-home orders; and other local, national and international travel restrictions. Not all countries have employed lockdowns. Physical distancing measures are designed to slow the spread of the virus and limit the burden of serious illness on overstretched health services, rather than to eradicate the virus. However, in some countries where they were employed early (e.g. New Zealand), they resulted in com­plete, although temporary, eradication of virus in the community.
Other important measures in limiting virus spread are ensuring high levels of case identication, ramping up testing to identify cases, ensur­ing public health follow-up of potential cases and enforcing quarantine measures for cases, contacts and travellers from high-incidence coun­tries. The combination of such strategies has been termed ‘test, trace and isolate’ (TTI). Countries have tended to increase TTI measures as they have eased lockdowns, in an attempt to prevent rebound increases in cases and the need for subsequent lockdowns, which are economi­cally damaging. Novel approaches to TTI have been developed, including the use of mobile phone apps, CCTV footage and tracking of a con­tact’s digital signature, depending on jurisdiction and legal constraints. Surveillance sampling of all adults combined with advice to stay at home have been implemented as measures against emerging variant viruses.
Social distancing strategies employed when lockdown is not con­sidered necessary have included keeping people physically separate (a target of 2 metres has been used in the UK), promoting frequent
13
296  I NFE C TI O US D IS E ASE
https://t.me/medicina_free
hand hygiene and enforcing the use of face coverings in places where close contact is likely.
Vulnerable adults, including older and immunocompromised people, have been advised to limit social interactions, a strategy termed ‘shield­ing’ in the UK.
Clinical features
The incubation period for COVID-19 is 5-6 days on average but can range from 2-14 days. Many infections, probably between 80% and 90%, are asymptomatic. Where patients do experience symptoms, these are very variable and depend on the vaccination status of the patient and the SARS-CoV-2 variant with which they are infected.
In unvaccinated patients and with variants predominating in the rst year of the pandemic, typical symptoms include high fever, persistent cough, shortness of breath and loss of taste or smell. Myalgia, fatigue, dizziness or headache are also frequent, as are chest pain, vomiting and diarrhoea. Vomiting and diarrhoea may be prominent features and may precede fever, and gastrointestinal symptoms are often also prominent in children. Confusion or delirium occur, particularly in older people. Variant strains seen in the UK are associated with a greater range of symptoms, for example cough, sore throat, fatigue, myal­gia and headaches appear more common, whereas loss of smell or taste are less common, than with the original virus. Variant B1.617.2 (Delta) became the dominant variant in many countries by summer 2021, and commonly presented with coryzal symptoms, myalgia and headache, with cough and loss of taste or smell being a less common presentation.
Before the introduction of vaccination, approximately 15% of symp­tomatic patients would develop severe symptoms and 5% critical illness. Physical examination of such patients may reveal tachycardia, hypotension, cyanosis, hypoxia or bilateral crackles in the lung elds. Bronchial breath sounds and focal consolidation may suggest bacte­rial superinfection. Skin lesions are common and include maculopapular lesions, vesicles, pustules and urticarial lesions. Chilblain-like lesions with oedema or haemorrhage under the skin are also described. The differ­ential diagnosis with a predominant respiratory presentation will include community-acquired pneumonia, inuenza and other severe respiratory virus infections, including MERS-CoV.
If complications occur they usually develop in the second week. These are most commonly due to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Bacterial pneumonia complicates a minority of infections and sepsis may occur. Superinfections occur, in particular in those with critical illness, including fungal infection due to Aspergillus, for which prolonged intuba­tion is a risk factor. In India especially, mucormycosis (p. 345) emerged as a specic complication, especially in patients with pre-existing diabe­tes mellitus who were treated with steroids. Disseminated intravascular coagulation is seen in the majority of those who do not survive and is associated with severe disease and multi-organ failure. Venous throm­boembolism occurs in 20%–30% of critically ill patients but may occur in any patients.
Microthrombi can form in the lung and some have proposed the term ‘microvascular COVID-19 lung vessels obstructive thrombo­inammatory syndrome’ (MicroCLOTS) to distinguish this syndrome from conventional pulmonary embolism. Acute myocardial injury is reported in 5%–31% and acute coronary syndromes, myocarditis or arrhythmia occur. Acute kidney injury is common in hospitalised patients and up to a third of those requiring mechanical ventilation may require renal dialysis. Neurological complications are diverse and include cerebrovascular disease, cerebral venous thrombosis, menin­gitis, encephalitis, seizures, impaired consciousness, ataxia, neuropa­thies and Guillain-Barré syndrome. Rhabdomyolysis and secondary bacterial infections can occur. Hypothyroidism can be a long-term complication.
A striking characteristic of SARS-CoV-2 is its varying severity in dif­ferent age groups. In broad terms the severity of infection ranges from mild or asymptomatic in children (in whom a fatal outcome is exceed­ingly rare) to severe and life-threatening in older adults. A specic but
13.37 Features of COVID-19 in older age and frailty
Pathogenesis: reduced expression of hACE2 may predispose to more severe
respiratory presentation
Immunity: increased inammatory responses in general and reduced antiviral
responses may reduce viral clearance and increase complications
Clinical features: atypical presentations with confusion, delirium and fallsComplications: increased complication ratesMortality: case fatality rate doubled in those > 65 years and increases with ageInvestigations: lack of data on PCR sensitivity in older ageTreatment: may be less likely to be admitted to intensive carePreventative strategies: more likely to be asked to ‘shield’ (minimise social
interaction), with consequences for general well-being. Older adults are associated with lower vaccine responses in other diseases
rare manifestation in children is the ‘paediatric inammatory multisystem syndrome: temporally associated with SARS-CoV-2’ (PIMS-TS), also referred to as multisystem inammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C). This severe complication consists of fever, abdominal symptoms, rash, conjunctivitis and markers of a high inammatory response. Myocardial dysfunction, shock and respiratory failure are common complications, and some children meet a clinical denition of Kawasaki disease with features such as coronary artery dilatation or vascular aneurysms. This syndrome appears distinct from Kawasaki disease, however, since it involves an older age group with more marked elevation of inammatory biomarkers, and is associated with COVID-19. There is also a variant of MIS in adults.
The true case fatality rate for SARS-CoV-2 infection is not known because the apparent incidence of disease is inuenced by many dif­ferent factors. These factors include sampling strategies (i.e. testing a larger number of asymptomatic individuals will reduce the apparent mor­tality); the denition of a COVID-19-associated death (which varies with both time and jurisdiction); the period of follow-up or extent to which late deaths are attributed to COVID-19; the stage of the pandemic at which sampling was carried out (as mortality has fallen with the introduction of specic treatments); and the proportion of vaccinated vs. unvaccinated cases (as mortality is much lower in patients infected post-vaccination). However, at the time of writing there have been 4.6 million deaths and 222 million conrmed cases (2.1% overall mortality). The case fatality rate is therefore lower than for SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV, which have 11% and 34% mortality, respectively. Where death occurs, it is most often in the third week due to respiratory failure.
Virus is shed in respiratory secretions for approximately 17–24 days. Infection rates appear higher in urban or socially deprived areas. Mortality is higher with male gender, age and frailty (Box 13.37) and medical comorbidity (e.g. diabetes, heart disease, hypertension, chronic lung disease). In the UK mortality is higher in people with African Caribbean and South Asian origin, compared to individuals who have primarily European ancestry. A genome-wide association study linked severity to blood group A as opposed to blood group O, as well as a gene cluster in chromosome 3 that includes several chemokine receptors. The role of immunocompromise on COVID-19 is still being established. Immunocompomised patients may have atypical pres­entations and prolonged viral shedding, but may be less susceptible to severe COVID-19 if they are on anti-inammatory treatments that modify COVID-19 pathogenesis. Early data suggested that patients immunosuppressed due to cancer or organ transplant recipients may present with more severe disease, while those receiving biologics do not. Increased age and medical comorbidity are associated with severe disease and mortality, and care homes have experienced outbreaks with high mortality.
‘Long COVID’ is a term that has been used to describe both prolonged COVID-19 and a post-COVID-19 syndrome that may involve almost any body system. In the UK, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) has dened acute COVID-19 as ‘signs and symptoms of COVID-19 for up to 4 weeks’, ongoing symptomatic COVID-19 as
Vi ra l i nf ec t io ns  297
https://t.me/medicina_free
‘signs and symptoms of COVID-19 from 4 to 12 weeks’ and the post­COVID-19 syndrome as ‘signs and symptoms that develop during or after an infection consistent with COVID-19, continue for more than 12 weeks and are not explained by an alternative diagnosis’. ‘Long COVID’ would encompass the latter two scenarios. The World Health Organization has developed a denition for ‘post COVID-19 condition’ that species a symptom duration of at least two months, with symptoms being either a continuation of the initial infection or new symptoms after initial recovery. This too would accord with the popular understanding of ‘long COVID’. Whatever denition is used, the most common unifying feature of long COVID/the post-COVID syndrome is fatigue, which can be prolonged and extreme. Other common presentations have included multisystem inammatory symptoms, persistent fevers and evidence of organ dysfunction affecting almost any organ, but particularly the heart and lungs. Persistent headache, memory problems, insomnia and men­tal health symptoms such as depression are frequently reported, as are loss of taste and smell, deafness and tinnitus, arthralgia, skin rashes and paraesthaesias. In reality, the post-COVID syndrome is likely to be a con­ation of different conditions, not all of which are specic to COVID-19 (e.g. COVID-19 itself, the sequelae of complications of COVID-19 and the various causes of ICU acquired weakness, p. 215). Optimal management strategies for long COVID have not yet been established.
Investigations
Laboratory abnormalities can include an increased neutrophil to lympho­cyte ratio; elevated ALT, D-dimer and inammatory markers, including C-reactive protein (CRP) and ferritin; hypoalbuminaemia and lympho­penia. However, these ndings are non-specic and of very little help in distinguishing COVID-19 from other infections. Procalcitonin (PCT) may be elevated and may raise suspicion of secondary bacterial infection, though there is currently insufcient evidence to recommend its routine use or on which to base decisions on whom to give antimicrobials on this test. Acute kidney injury is common in severe disease. Hypokalaemia and hypocalcaemia are common. Hyperglycaemia is also reported and may be observed in patients not known to be diabetic. Hypoxia may be accompanied by hypocapnia so that it appears inappropriately well tolerated (‘happy hypoxia’).
Chest radiology shows bilateral predominantly basal and peripheral inltrates, or in a minority, unilateral inltrates. CT scan of the chest shows ‘ground glass’ abnormalities, consolidation, septal thickening or crazy-pavement patterning (Fig. 13.18). Lesions are most often basal, peripheral and bilateral. Pulmonary vascular enlargement, pleural or per­icardial effusions may be observed in a minority. CT changes may occur in those with negative chest radiography and negative PCR and can be used in patients in whom COVID-19 is strongly suspected but not con­rmed. In general CT is reserved for severe cases or those with other indications for performing a CT.
Microbiological diagnosis is by nasopharyngeal or oropharyngeal swab and reverse-transcription PCR (RT-PCR) to detect viral RNA. Sensitivity is approximately 60%–70% and specicity is high (approxi­mately 98%). Nasotracheal aspirates or deep sputum samples may have greater sensitivity. Antibody detection can conrm prior exposure but may cross-react with antibodies from other coronaviruses. Lateral ow immunochromatography (p. 106) is also used to detect SARS-CoV-2 antigens. It is rapid (around 30 minutes) and can be used at home but is less sensitive and specic than PCR.
Management
Treatment is supportive, with high ow oxygen and proning. Non-invasive ventilation or mechanical ventilation are required for those with more severe respiratory failure. Fluid resuscitation is frequently required for hospitalised patients and antimicrobials are added if there are signs or symptoms suggestive of secondary infection. Inotropic support may be required for shock. Renal replacement therapy may be required for acute kidney injury, and anticoagulation if there is evidence of venous throm­boembolism. Dexamethasone improves survival and is recommended for hospitalised patients requiring supplemental oxygen or mechanical ventilation. Anti-interleukin (IL)-6 monoclonal antibodies (e.g. tocilizumab) reduce mortality and reduce time to recovery in critically ill patients if administered within 24 hours of admission to an intensive care unit. In the UK tocilizumab is also used in patients with oxygen saturations <92% on repeated measurement on room air with a CRP 75 mg/L. An initial randomised clinical trial of the nucleotide analogue remdesivir (Chapter
6) found that it decreased the time to recovery when used within 10 days of symptom onset in patients requiring supplemental oxygen but not mechanical ventilation. However, it has not been found to signicantly improve survival and is not currently recommended by the WHO. Antiviral agents are being developed with the goal of administering these early after symptom onset to prevent the later inammatory complications. Preliminary trial results indicate that the oral antiviral agents molnupiravir and Paxlovid reduce hospitalisation and death if given within the rst 3-5 days of symptoms. Molnupiravir is a prodrug, which is metabolised into a form that causes viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase to introduce fatal mutations into nascent RNA strands. Paxlovid is a combination of two protease inhibitors, the investigational compound PF-07321332, and ritonavir; PF-07321332 is targeted against SARS-CoV-2 3CL pro­tease and ritonavir inhibits the breakdown of PF-07321332. However, both drugs remain experimental at the time of writing, and there are many other potential SARS-CoV-2 antiviral agents at various stages of development. An alternative antiviral strategy is to use antibodies against the virus. The use of single monoclonal antibodies to variable regions of the S protein is limited by rapid emergence of viral resistance and they have not demonstrated efcacy. In contrast, combinations of two monoclonal antibodies (e.g. casirivimab and imdevimab (REGEN-COV)
13
Fig. 13.18 Chest computerised tomography (CT) scan of a patient with COVID-19. The images show widespread areas of consolidation in both lungs.
BA
298  I NFE C TI O US D IS E ASE
https://t.me/medicina_free
13.38 SARS-CoV-2 vaccines licensed or at a late stage of development*
Manufacturer Vaccine type Number of doses administered Reported efcacy Storage requirements
Oxford/AstraZeneca Viral vector, ChAdOx (chimpanze adenovirus) 2 62%–90% 4°C
Moderna mRNA 2 95%
Pzer–BioNTech mRNA 2 95%
Gamaleya (Sputnik V) Viral vector, Ad5 and Ad26 (human
2 92% 4°C
20°C
70°C
adenoviruses)
Janssen (Johnson &
Viral vector, Ad26 (human adenovirus) 1 66% 4°C
Johnson)
Novovax Protein subunit 2 95% 4°C
Sinopharm Inactivated virus 2 80% 4°C
Sinovac Inactivated virus 2 50% 4°C
Sinopharm–Wuhan Inactivated virus 2 70% 4°C
Bharat Biotech Inactivated virus 2 80% 4°C
*This list was accurate at the time of writing (mid-2021). However, because of the rapid speed of vaccine development this is not a complete list of available SARS-CoV-2 vaccines.
or bamlanivimab and etesevimab) are anticipated to represent a greater barrier to escape mutants and preserve efcacy. Initial studies demonstrate these reduce viral load and medical visits in outpatients and reduce hospital stay length and mortality in patients who have not mounted a natural antibody response following vaccination. The efcacy of monoclonal antibodies against the S protein may be challenged by the emergence of variants with mutations such as E484K, and approaches being developed in response include the use of ‘broadly neutralizing’ antibodies that target more conserved regions of the S protein. Trials using convalescent serum have not shown efcacy.
Vaccination
Because of the global impact of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic vaccine devel­opment started very soon after the virus was identied and sequenced. Vaccines approved or in development include inactivated vaccines, RNA and DNA vaccines, protein subunit vaccines and recombinant RNA vac­cines delivered in virus vectors (Box 13.38). The SARS-CoV-2 vaccines induce T-cell immunity in addition to neutralizing antibody but the extent and longevity as well as the ability to block transmission are still being assessed. In general, vaccines have been shown to be efcacious and some have reported efcacy against variant strains after single doses, although the efcacy of single dose vaccination is markedly reduced for the B1.617.2 (Delta) variant. Vaccines have a more dramatic effect on reduction of hospitalised cases than they do on reduction of overall infec­tion but they still play a major role in reducing community transmission. Vaccines are being developed to combat variant strains, including poten­tially addition of booster doses with modied RNA vaccines. Vaccines have demonstrated safety after billions of administered doses. Side-effects have been minimal and dwarfed by the ongoing mortality of COVID-19 in those without vaccination. Reported severe complications have occurred at incidences approximating 1 per million or less. At least two of the ade­noviral vector COVID-19 vaccines have been linked to very rare cases of thrombosis with thrombocytopenia (‘vaccine-induced thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome (TTS)’), a condition with some similarities to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (p. 948). Guillain-Barré syndrome is also reported after the adenoviral vaccines. The RNA vaccines have been linked to rare cases of myocarditis and pericarditis.
Vaccination programmes were rolled out at different rates in differ­ent countries. The strategy of rollout used in the UK and some other countries was to target the highest-risk demographic groups rst (e.g. older people and those with underlying health conditions). As infection is less severe in patients who have been vaccinated, this strategy grad­ually converted COVID-19 from a severe disease with high mortality affecting the older population to a predominantly non-severe disease
with low mortality affecting younger people. Other strategies may have been used in different countries. The duration of immunity conferred by vaccines and natural infection is not yet known, and booster doses are likely to be required depending on the evidence that emerges.
The need to maintain the ‘cold chain’ from manufacture to adminis­tration is vital for any vaccine. However, it is a particular challenge the pure RNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, as they need to be stored at either
20°C or 70°C at all times. This is likely to reduce their use in low- and middle-income countries, where the logistical infrastructure required to maintain the cold chain is less likely to be available.
‘Vaccine hesitancy’ refers to a heterogenous process in which individu­als may refuse or delay vaccination. Vaccine hesitancy has been encoun­tered in many countries and may be more prominent in populations with demographics that vary in different regions. This can represent a major challenge to ensuring high levels of vaccine uptake in a population.
Other considerations
The COVID-19 pandemic has necessitated changes in the law, e.g. to enable governments to mandate the use of masks in public, enforce lockdowns and streamline the processes of death certication to deal with surges in deaths. It has caused health services to become over­whelmed with acutely ill patients, with a knock-on effect of delaying the treatment of less urgent cases. An as yet unquantied problem is the burden of psychological illness in staff who work in patient-facing roles with COVID-19 patients and face issues such as physical exhaustion, burnout and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).
Viral infections with neurological involvement
See also page 1175.
Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV)
This avivirus is an important cause of endemic encephalitis in Japan, China, Russia, South-east Asia, India and Pakistan; outbreaks also occur elsewhere. There are 10000–20000 cases reported to the WHO annually. Pigs and aquatic birds are the reservoirs and transmission is by Culex mosquitoes. Exposure to rice paddies is a recognised risk factor.
Clinical features
The incubation period is 4–21 days. Most infections are subclinical in childhood and 1% or less of infections lead to encephalitis. Initial sys­temic illness with fever, malaise and anorexia is followed by headache,
Ba ct er i al i n fe ct ion s  299
https://t.me/medicina_free
photophobia, vomiting and changes in brainstem function. Other neuro­logical features include meningism, seizures, cranial nerve palsies, ac­cid or spastic paralysis and extrapyramidal syndromes. Mortality with neurological disease is 25%. Some 50% of survivors have neurological sequelae.
Investigations, management and prevention
Other infectious causes of encephalitis should be excluded. There is neutrophilia and often hyponatraemia. CSF analysis reveals lymphocy­tosis and elevated protein. Serological testing of serum and CSF aids diagnosis but may cross-react with dengue and other aviviruses.
Treatment is supportive. Vaccination is recommended for travellers to endemic areas during the monsoon. Some endemic countries include vaccination in their childhood schedules.
Tick-borne encephalitis virus
This avivirus is endemic in an area from northern Europe (including the UK) that extends across Siberia to China and Japan. Its incidence is increasing, and it is transmitted from domestic or wild animals by Ixodes ticks or sometimes by unpasteurised dairy products. The incubation period is up to 28 days but averages 7 days. A third of cases cause symptoms, with fever, myalgia and headache followed by an interval of up to a month before meningitis, encephalitis or radiculitis occur. The Far Eastern sub-type tends to be more severe. Diagnosis is by IgM ELISA or detection of viral RNA by RT-PCR of blood or CSF. IgG serology cross-reacts with other aviviruses. Treatment is supportive. Prevention is by avoidance of tick bites. A vaccine is also available.
West Nile virus
This avivirus is an important cause of neurological disease throughout Australia, India and Russia through Africa and Southern Europe and across to North America. The disease has an avian reservoir and a Culex mos­quito vector. Older people are at increased risk of neurological disease.
Clinical features
Most infections are asymptomatic. After 2–6 days’ incubation, a mild febrile illness and arthralgia may occur. A prolonged incubation may be seen in immunocompromised individuals. Children may develop a maculopapular rash. Neurological disease is seen in 1% and is charac­terised by encephalitis, meningitis or asymmetric accid paralysis with 10% mortality.
Diagnosis and management
Diagnosis is by serology or detection of viral RNA in blood or CSF. Serological tests may show cross-reactivity with other aviviruses, including vaccine strains. Treatment is supportive.
infection. Serology, sometimes conrmed with PCR, establishes the diagnosis. Treatment is supportive.
Viral infections with rheumatological involvement
Rheumatological syndromes characterise a variety of viral infections ranging from exanthems, such as rubella and parvovirus B19, to blood­borne viruses, such as HBV and HIV-1 and the sequelae of EVD.
Chikungunya virus
Chikungunya is an alphavirus that causes fever, rash and arthropathy. The disease occurs mainly in Africa and throughout Asia, but is becoming commoner in other areas, including South America and the Carribbean. Cases occur sporadically or in epidemics, with notable epidemics occur­ring in Réunion and Mauritius (>272 000 cases in 2005–06) and India (1 400 000 cases in 2006). Humans and non-human primates are the main reservoir. The vectors are Aedes mosquitoes including Ae. aegyptii and Ae. albopictus.
The incubation period is 2–12 days. A period of fever may be followed by an afebrile phase and then recrudescence of fever. Children may develop a maculopapular rash. Adults are susceptible to arthritis, which causes early morning pain and swelling, most often in the small joints. Arthritis can persist for months and may become chronic in individuals who are positive for human leucocyte antigen (HLA)-B27. Related alpha­viruses causing similar syndromes include Sindbis virus (Scandinavia and Africa), O’nyong-nyong virus (Central Africa), Ross River virus (Australia) and Mayaro virus (Caribbean and South America).
Diagnosis is by serology but cross-reactivity between alphaviruses occurs. Treatment is symptomatic. The disease may be debilitating but is rarely fatal.
Prion diseases
Prions cause transmissible spongiform encephalopathies and are dis­cussed in Chapter 28.
Bacterial infections
Bacterial infections of the skin, soft tissues and bones
Most infections of the skin, soft tissues and bone are caused by either Staph. aureus or streptococci (mainly Strep. pyogenes) (see pp. 1025 and 1090).
13
Nipah virus encephalitis
Nipah virus is a paramyxovirus in the Henipavirus genus, which caused an epidemic of encephalitis in Malaysia and subsequently outbreaks in Bangladesh and India. Mortality is around 30%. Diagnosis is by PCR or serology.
Human T-cell lymphotropic virus type I
Human T-cell lymphotropic virus type I (HTLV-1) is a retrovirus that causes chronic infection with development of adult T-cell leukaemia/ lymphoma (ATL) or HTLV-1-associated myelopathy (HAM) in a sub­set of those infected (see Box 25.57). It is found mainly in Japan, the Caribbean, Central and South America, and the Seychelles. The life­time risk of ATL in those with chronic HTLV-1 infection is estimated at 2.5%–4%. HAM or tropical spastic paraparesis occurs in less than 5% of those with chronic infection, and presents with gait disturbance, spasticity of the lower extremities, urinary incontinence, impotence and sensory disturbance. Myositis and uveitis may also occur with HTLV-1
Staphylococcal infections
Staphylococci are usually found colonising the anterior nares and skin. Some staphylococci produce coagulase, an enzyme that converts brin­ogen to brin in rabbit plasma, causing it to clot. Staph. aureus is coagu­lase-positive, and most other species are coagulase-negative.
Staph. aureus is the main cause of staphylococcal infections. Staphylococcus intermedius is another coagulase-positive staph-
ylococcus, which causes infection following dog bites. Among coagulase-negative organisms, Staphylococcus epidermidis is the predominant commensal organism of the skin, and can cause severe infections in those with central venous catheters or implanted pros­thetic materials. Staphylococcus saprophyticus is part of the normal vaginal ora and causes urinary tract infections in sexually active young women. Staphylococcus lugdunensis, Staphylococcus schleiferi, Staphylococcus haemolyticus and Staphylococcus caprae are also human pathogens.
Staphylococcal blood-stream infections can disseminate widely (Fig. 13.19). In any patient with staphylococcal bacteraemia, especially
300  I NFE C TI O US D IS E ASE
https://t.me/medicina_free
Respiratory
Pneumonia
Lung abscess
Empyema
Cardiac
Endocarditis
Pericarditis
Blood stream
Blood-stream
infection
Metastatic abscesses
CNS
Meningitis Brain abscess (neurosurgical infections in particular)
Bone and joint
Osteomyelitis Septic arthritis
Intestinal
Enterocolitis
Multisystem
Toxic shock syndrome
Skin
Wound infections
Boils, styes, carbuncles, abscesses
Fig. 13.19 Infections caused by Staphylococcus aureus (CNS = central
nervous system)
injection drug-users, the possibility of endocarditis must be considered (see p. 462). Growth of Staph. aureus in blood cultures should not be dismissed as a ‘contaminant’. Spreading cellulitis mandates the urgent need for an antistaphylococcal antibiotic, such as ucloxacillin, cefazo­lin or a glycopeptide if MRSA is suspected. This is particularly true for mid-facial cellulitis, which can result in cavernous sinus thrombophlebitis.
In addition, Staph. aureus can cause severe systemic disease due to the effects of toxin produced at supercial sites in the absence of tissue invasion by bacteria.
Skin infections
Staphylococci cause ecthyma, folliculitis, furuncles, carbuncles, bul­lous impetigo and the scalded skin syndrome, which are discussed in
Chapter 27. They may also be involved in necrotising infections of the
skin and subcutaneous tissues.
Wound infections
Many wound infections, which prolong post-operative care, are caused by staphylococci (Fig. 13.20A). Prevention involves careful attention to hand hygiene, skin preparation and aseptic technique, and the use of topical and systemic antibiotic prophylaxis.
Treatment is by early drainage of any abscesses, removal of pros­thetic materials if possible, plus adequate dosage of antistaphylococcal antibiotics.
Cannula-related infection
Staphylococcal infection associated with cannula sepsis ( Fig. 13.20B) and thrombophlebitis is an important and common reason for morbidity following hospital admission. The visual infusion phlebitis (VIP) score aids cannula evaluation (Box 13.39). Staphylococci have a predilection for plastic, rapidly forming a biolm on cannulae, which is a source of bac­teraemia. Local poultice application may relieve symptoms but cannula removal and antibiotic treatment with ucloxacillin (or a glycopeptide) are necessary if there is spreading infection.
Meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
Resistance to meticillin is due to a penicillin-binding protein mutation in Staph. aureus, which confers resistance to almost all ß-lactam antibiotics.
BA
Fig. 13.20 Manifestations of skin infection with Staphylococcus aureus
13.39 How to assess an intravenous (IV) cannula using the visual infusion phlebitis (VIP) score
Clinical features Score Assessment and
management
IV site appears healthy 0 No signs of phlebitis
Observe cannula
One of the following is evident:
Slight pain near IV site Slight redness near IV site
Two of the following are evident:
Pain near IV site
1 Possible rst signs of
phlebitis
Observe cannula
2 Early stage of phlebitis
Resite cannula Erythema Swelling
ALL of the following are evident and extensive:
Pain along path of cannula
3 Medium stage of phlebitis
Resite cannula
Consider treatment Erythema Induration
ALL of the following are evident and extensive:
Pain along path of cannula Erythema Induration
4 Advanced stage of
phlebitis or start of
thrombophlebitis
Resite cannula
Consider treatment Palpable venous cord
ALL of the following are evident:
Pain along path of cannula Erythema Induration
5 Advanced stage of
thrombophlebitis
Initiate treatment
Resite cannula Palpable venous cord Pyrexia
Adapted from Jackson A. Infection control: a battle in vein infusion phlebitis. Nursing Times 1997; 94:68–71.
Resistance to vancomycin/teicoplanin (glycopeptides) in either glycopep­tide intermediate Staph. aureus (GISA) or, rarely, vancomycin-resistant (VRSA) strains threatens management of serious staphylococcal infec­tions. Meticillin-resistant Staph. aureus (MRSA) is now a major worldwide health care-acquired pathogen, accounting for up to 40% of staphylo­coccal bacteraemia in high-income countries. Community-acquired MRSA (c-MRSA) currently accounts for 50% of all MRSA infections in the USA. These organisms have also acquired other toxins, such as Panton– Valentine leukocidin (PVL), and can cause rapidly fatal infection in young people. Clinicians must be aware of the potential danger of these infections and implement appropriate locally approved infection control measures.
Treatment options for MRSA are shown in Box 6.16. Treatment should always be based on the results of antimicrobial susceptibility testing, since resistance to all these agents occurs. Milder MRSA infections may be
treated with clindamycin, tetracyclines or co-trimoxazole. Glycopeptides,
https://t.me/medicina_free
linezolid and daptomycin are reserved for treatment of more severe infec­tions. Toxin-producing MRSA infections should be treated with the addi­tion of protein-inhibiting antibiotics (clindamycin, linezolid).
Staphylococcal toxic shock syndrome
Staphylococcal toxic shock syndrome (TSS) is a life-threatening disease associated with infection by Staph. aureus producing a specic toxin (toxic shock syndrome toxin 1, TSST1). Formerly seen in young women in association with the use of highly absorbent intravaginal tampons, it can occur with any infection involving a TSST1-producing Staph. aureus strain. The toxin acts as a ‘super-antigen’, triggering signicant T-cell activation and massive cytokine release.
TSS has an abrupt onset with high fever, generalised systemic upset (myalgia, headache, sore throat and vomiting), a widespread erythematous blanching rash resembling scarlet fever, and hypotension. It rapidly pro­gresses over a few hours to multi-organ failure, leading to death in 10%– 20%. Recovery is accompanied at 7–10 days by desquamation (Fig. 13.21).
The diagnosis is clinical and may be conrmed in menstrual cases by nding a retained tampon with staphylococci on Gram stain. Subsequent culture and demonstration of toxin production are conrmatory.
Management
Treatment is with immediate and aggressive uid resuscitation and an intra­venous antistaphylococcal antimicrobial, usually with the addition of a protein synthesis inhibitor (e.g. clindamycin) to inhibit toxin production. Intravenous immunoglobulin is occasionally added in the most severe cases. Women who recover from tampon-associated TSS should avoid tampons for at least 1 year and they should be advised that the condition can recur.
Streptococcal infections
Streptococci are oropharyngeal and gut commensals, which appear as Gram-positive cocci in chains (see Fig. 6.3). They were classied by the pattern of haemolysis they produce on blood agar (see Fig. 6.4), by their ‘Lanceeld serogroups’ (Box 13.40) but are now usually identied and classied by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionisation time-of-ight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry. Some streptococci (e.g. Strep. milleri group) defy simple classication.
Strep. pyogenes (group A streptococcus, GAS) is the leading cause of bacterial pharyngitis. Although the presence of fever, tender anterior lym­phadenopathy and purulent tonsillar exudate and the absence of cough make streptococcal pharyngitis more likely than viral infection, clinical fea­tures alone are unreliable for diagnosing streptococcal pharyngitis. GAS are the major cause of cellulitis, erysipelas and impetigo. They also cause the post-streptococcal syndromes of glomerulonephrits and rheumatic fever, which are described in Chapters 14 and 16, respectively. The closely related Streptococcus dysgalactiae subsp. equisimilis (SDSE) (formerly groups C and G) cause cellulitis, particularly in older people, diabetic or immunocompromised patients. Streptococcus agalactiae (group B strep- tococci (GBS)) colonise the gut and vagina. They cause post-partum and neonatal sepsis, as well as other deep infections (infective endocarditis, septic arthritis, osteomyelitis etc.), especially in older people.
Streptococcal scarlet fever
Strep. pyogenes (or occasionally SDSE) causing pharyngitis, tonsillitis or other infection may lead to scarlet fever, if the infecting strain pro­duces a streptococcal pyrogenic exotoxin. Scarlet fever is most common in school-age children, but can also occur in young adults who have contact with young children. A diffuse erythematous rash occurs, which blanches on pressure (Fig. 13.22A), classically with circumoral pallor. The tongue, initially coated, becomes red and swollen (‘strawberry tongue’,
Fig. 13.22B). The disease lasts about 7 days, the rash disappearing in
7–10 days, followed by a ne desquamation. Residual petechial lesions in the antecubital fossa, ‘Pastia’s sign’, can occur (Fig. 13.22C).
Treatment involves intravenous benzylpenicillin or an oral penicillin plus symptomatic measures.
Ba ct er i al i n fe ct ion s  301
Fig. 13.21 Full-thickness desquamation after staphylococcal toxic shock
syndrome.
13.40 Streptococcal and related infections
β-haemolytic group A (Streptococcus pyogenes)
Skin and soft tissue infection
(including erysipelas, impetigo,
necrotising fasciitis)
Streptococcal toxic shock syndromePuerperal sepsisScarlet fever
β-haemolytic streptococci group B (Strep. agalactiae)
Neonatal infections, including
meningitis
β-haemolytic streptococci groups C and G
CellulitisEndocarditis
α-, β- or non-haemolytic group D (Enterococcus faecalis, E. faecium)
EndocarditisIntra-abdominal infections
α- or non-haemolytic group D (Strep. gallolyticus subsp. gallolyticus/S. bovis biotype I)
Bacteraemia/endocarditis associated
with large bowel malignancy
α-haemolytic optochin-resistant (viridans streptococci – Strep. mitis, Strep. sanguis, Strep. mutans, Strep. salivarius)
Sepsis in immunosuppressed Endocarditis
α-haemolytic optochin-sensitive (Strep. pneumoniae)
PneumoniaMeningitisEndocarditisOtitis media
Variable haemolysis (Strep. milleri group – Strep. anginosus, Strep. intermedius, Strep. constellatus)
EndocarditisIntra-abdominal infections
Anaerobic streptococci (Peptostreptococcus spp.)
Sepsis in immunosuppressed Endocarditis
N.B. All streptococci can cause sepsis.
GlomerulonephritisRheumatic feverBone and joint infectionTonsillitis
Female pelvic infectionsCellulitis
PharyngitisSeptic arthritis
Urinary tract infection
SepsisSpontaneous bacterial peritonitisSinusitis
Urinary tract infection
13