Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_701_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
55 Мб
Скачать
14 Thyroidectomy Procedures
435
85. Kocher T. Über die Kropfexstirpation und ihre Folgen. Arch Klin Chir. 1883;29:254–337.
86. Miccoli P, Berti P, Raffaelli M, Conte M, Materazzi G, Galleri D.Minimally invasive video-assisted thy­roidectomy. Am J Surg. 2001;181:567–70.
87. Terris DJ. Novel surgical maneuvers in modern thyroid surgery. Op Techn Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009;20:23–8.
88. Miccoli P, Berti P, Bendinelli C, Conte M, Fasolini F, Martino E.Minimally invasive videoassisted surgery of the thyroid: a preliminary report. Langenbeck's Arch Surg. 2000;385:261–4.
89. Palazzo FF, Sebag F, Henry JF. Endocrine surgical technique: endoscopic thyroidectomy via the lateral approach. Surg Endosc. 2006;20:339–42.
90. Shimizu S.Minimally invasive thyroid surgery. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;15:123–37.
91. Lorenz K, Miccoli P, Monchik JM, Duren M, Dralle H. Minimally invasive video-assisted parathyroid­ectomy: multiinstitutional study. World J Surg. 2001;25:704–7.
92. Yim JH, Carty SE.Re-dening the modern standard for open thyroidectomy. In: Program and abstracts of the 73rd annual meeting of the American Thyroid Association; September 13–16, 2001: Washington, DC; 2001.
93. Gao W, Liu L, Ye G, Song L. Application of mini­mally invasive video-assisted technique in papillary thyroid microcarcinoma. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2013;23(5):468–73. [Medline]
94. Miccoli P, Berti P. Minimally invasive parathyroid surgery. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;15:139–47.
95. Kazi R, Katna R, Dwivedi RG.Minimal access thy­roid surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2010;92:361–2.
96. Mouret P.How I developed laparoscopic cholecys­tectomy. Ann Acad Med Singap. 1996;25:744–7.
97. Henry JF.Minimally invasive surgery of the thyroid and parathyroid glands. Br J Surg. 2006;93:1–2.
98. Park YL, Han WK, Bae WG. 100 cases of endo­scopic thyroidectomy: breast approach. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2003;13:20–5.
99. Stalberg P, Delbridge L, van Heerden J, Barraclough B. Minimally invasive parathyroidectomy and thyroidectomy current concepts. Surgeon. 2007;5:301–8.
100. Miccoli P, Ambrosini CE, Materazzi G, Fregoli L, Fosso LA, Berti P. New technologies in thy­roid surgery. Endosc Thyroid Surg Minerva Chir. 2007;62:335–49.
101. Lombardi CP, Raffaelli M, Princi P, Lulli P, Rossi ED, Fadda G, etal. Safety of video-assisted thyroid­ectomy versus conventional surgery. Head Neck. 2005;27(1):58–64.
102. Ohgami M, Ishii S, Arisawa Y.Scarless endoscopic thyroidectomy: breast approach for better cosmesis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2000;10:1–4.
103. Miccoli P, Berti P, Materazzi G, Minuto M, Barellini L. Minimally invasive video-assisted
thyroidectomy: ve years of experience. J Am Coll Surg. 2004;199:243–8.
104. Shimizu K, Kitagawa W, Akasu H, Hatori N, Hirai K, Tanaka S. Videoassisted endoscopic thyroid and parathyroid surgery using a gasless method of ante­rior neck skin lifting: a review of 130 cases. Surg Today. 2002;32:862–8.
105. Miccoli P, Berti P, Raffaeli M, Materazzi G, Baldacci S, Rossi G. Comparison between minimally inva­sive video assisted thyroidectomy and conventional thyroidectomy: a prospective randomized study. Surgery. 2001;130:1039–43.
106. Sayad P, Abdo Z, Ferzli GR, Cacchione RN.Minimally invasive, nonendoscopic thyroid sur­gery. J Ann Coll Surg. 2001;192:665–8.
107. Russell CF, Dolan SJ, Laird JD.Randomized clini­cal trial comparing scan-directed unilateral versus bilateral cervical exploration for primary hyper­parathyroidism due to solitary adenoma. Br J Surg. 2006;93:418–21.
108. Miccoli P, Bendinelli C, Berti P, Vignali E, Pinchera A, Marcocci C.Video-assisted versus conventional parathyroidectomy in primary hyperparathyroid­ism: a prospective randomized study. Surgery. 1999;126:1117–22.
109. Defechereux T, Rinken F, Maweja S, Hamoir E, Meurisse M.Evaluation of the ultrasonic dissector in thyroid surgery. A prospective randomised study. Acta Chir Belg. 2003;103:274–7.
110. Musunuru S, Schaefer S, Chen H.The use of the Ligasure for hemostasis during thyroid lobectomy. Am J Surg. 2008;195:382–4.
111. Randolph GW. Surgical anatomy of the recurrent laryngeal nerve. In: Randolph G, editor. Surgery of the thyroid and parathyroid glands. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; 2003. p.300–42.
112. Terris DJ, Anderson SK, Watts TL, Chin E.Laryngeal nerve monitoring and minimally invasive thy­roid surgery: complementary technologies. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007;133:1254–7.
113. Lombardi CP, Raffaelli M, Princi P, De Crea C, Bellantone R.Video-assisted thyroidectomy: report on the experience of a single center in more than four hundred cases. World J Surg. 2006;30:794–800.
114. Ujiki MB, Sturgeon C, Denham D, Yip L, Angelos P. Minimally invasive videoassisted thyroidectomy for follicular neoplasm: is there an advantage over conventional thyroidectomy? Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13:182–6.
115. Rafferty M, Miller I, Timon C.Minimal incision for open thyroidectomy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006;135:295–8.
116. Westerdalh J, Bergenfelz A.Unilateral versus bilat­eral neck exploration for primary hyperparathyroid­ism: ve-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2007;246:976–80.
117. Henry JF, Raffaelli M, Iacobone M, Volot F.Video­assisted parathyroidectomy via lateral approach versus conventional surgery in the treatment of
t.me/Dr_Mouayyad_AlbtousH
436
M. Sakr
sporadic primary hyperparathyroidism. Results of a case -control study. Surg Endosc. 2001;15:1116–9.
118. Alvarado R, McMullen T, Sidhu SB, Delbridge LW, Sywak MS. Minimally invasive thyroid sur­gery for single nodules: an evidence-based review of the lateral mini-incision technique. World J Surg. 2008;32(7):1341–8.
119. Bellantone R, Lombardi CP, Bossola M, Boscherini M, De Crea C, Alesina PF.Video-assisted vs conven­tional thyroid lobectomy: a randomized trial. Arch Surg. 2002;137:301–4.
120. Barczynski M, Cichon S, Konturek A, Cichon S. Minimally invasive video-assisted parathyroid­ectomy versus open minimally invasive parathy­roidectomy for solitary parathyroid adenoma: a prospective, randomized, blinded trial. World J Surg. 2006;30:721–31.
121. Radford PD, Ferguson MS, Magill JC, Karthikesalingham AP, Alusi G. Meta-analysis of minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy. Laryngoscope. 2011;121(8):1675–81.
122. Palazzo FF, Sywak MS, Sidhu SB, Delbridge LW.Safety and feasibility of thyroid lobectomy via a lateral 2.5-cm incision with a cohort comparison of the rst 50 cases: evolution of a surgical approach. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg. 2005;390(3):230–5.
123. Lundgren CI, Stalberg P, Grodski S, Sidhu S, Sywak M, Delbridge L.Minimally invasive thyroid surgery for diagnostic excision of solitary thyroid nodules. Asian J Surg. 2007;30(4):250–4.
124. Timon C, Miller IS. Minimally invasive video­assisted thyroidectomy: indications and technique. Laryngoscope. 2006;116:1046–9.
125. Miccoli P, Bellantone R, Mourad M, Walz M, Raffaelli M, Berti P. Minimally invasive video­assisted thyroidectomy: multi-institutional experi­ence. World J Surg. 2002;26:972–5.
126. Spinelli C, Donatini G, Berti P, Materazzi G, Costanzo S, Miccoli P. Minimally invasive video­assisted thyroidectomy in pediatric patients. J Pediatr Surg. 2008;43:1259–61.
127. El-Labban GM.Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy versus conventional thyroidectomy: a single-blinded, randomized controlled clinical trial. J Minim Access Surg. 2009;5(4):97–102.
128. Miccoli P, Materazzi G, Berti P.Minimally invasive thyroidectomy in the treatment of well differentiated thyroid cancers: indications and limits. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010;18(2):114–8.
129. Minuto MN, etal. Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy: an analysis of results and a revision of indications. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(3):818–22.
130. Miccoli P, Elisei R, Donatini G, Materazzi G, Berti P. Video-assisted central compartment lymphad­enectomy in patients with a positive RET oncogene: initial experience. Surg Endosc. 2007;21:120–3.
131. Miccoli P, Berti P, Ambrosini CE. Perspectives and lessons learned after a decade of minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy. ORL Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2008;70:282–6.
132. Miccoli P, Elisei R, Materazzi G, Capezzone M, Galleri D, Pacini F, Berti P, Pinchera A. Minimally invasive videoassisted thyroidectomy for papillary carcinoma: a prospective study of its completeness. Surgery. 2002;132:1070–3.
133. Miccoli P, Elisei R, Berti P, Materazzi G, Agate L, Castagna MG, et al. Video-assisted prophylac­tic thyroidectomy and central compartment nodes clearance in two RET gene mutation adult carriers. J Endocrinol Investig. 2004;27:557–61.
134. Miccoli P, Pinchera A, Materazzi G, Biagini A, Berti P, Faviana P, et al. Surgical treatment of low and intermediate-risk papillary thyroid cancer with mini­mally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94:1618–22.
135. Ruggieri M, Zullino A, Straniero A, Maiuolo A, Fumarola A, Vietri F, D’Armiento M.Is minimally invasive surgery appropriate for small differentiated thyroid carcinomas? Surg Today. 2010;40:418–22.
136. Youben F, Bomin G, Shunli G, Jie K, Bo W, Pin Z, Qi Z. Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroid­ectomy: experience of 300 cases. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:2393–400.
137. Henry JF, etal. Minimally invasive videoscopic para­thyroidectomy by lateral approach. Langenbeck's Arch Surg. 1999;384(3):298–301.
138. Slotema ET, Sebag F, Henry JF. What is the evi­dence for endoscopic thyroidectomy in the man­agement of benign thyroid disease? World J Surg. 2008;32(7):1325–32.
139. Alvarado R, McMullen T, Sidhu SB, Delbridge LW, Sywak MS. Minimally invasive thyroid sur­gery for single nodules: an evidence based review of the lateral mini-incision technique. World J Surg. 2008;32:1341–8.
140. Sasaki A, Nakajima J, Ikeda K, Otsuka K, Koeda K, Wakabayashi G. Endoscopic thyroidectomy by the breast approach: a single institution’s 9-year experi­ence. World J Surg. 2008;32:381–5.
141. Shimizu K, Shiba E, Tamaki Y, Takiguchi S, Tanigichi E, Ohashi S.Endoscopic thyroid surgery through the axillo-bilateral breast approach. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2003;13:196–201.
142. Yamashita H, Watanabe S, Koike E.Video-assisted thyroid lobectomy through a small wound in the sub­mandibular area. Am J Surg. 2002;183:286–9.
143. Wong KP, Lang BH. Endoscopic thyroidectomy: a literature review and update. Curr Surg Rep. 2013;1:7–15.
144. Shimizu K, Tanaka S. Asian perspective on endo­scopic thyroidectomy: a review of 193 cases. Asian J Surg. 2003;26:92–100.
145. Shimizu K, Akira S, Tanaka S.Video-assisted neck surgery: endoscopic resection of benign thyroid tumor aiming at scarless surgery on the neck. J Surg Oncol. 1998;69(3):178–80.
146. Lee YS, etal. Endoscopic thyroidectomy via a trans­axillary approach is a safe procedure in patients with breast augmentation. Surg Innov. 2012; https://doi.
org/10.1177/1553350612447694.
t.me/Dr_Mouayyad_AlbtousH
14 Thyroidectomy Procedures
437
147. Park CS, Chung WY, Chang HS.Minimally invasive open thyroidectomy. Surg Today. 2001;31:665–9.
148. Kang SW, Jeong JJ, Yun JS, Sung TY, Lee SC, Lee YS, etal. Gasless endoscopic thyroidectomy using trans-axillary approach; surgical outcome of 581 patients. Endocr J. 2009;56(3):361–9.
149. Ikeda Y, Takami H, Niimi M, Kan S, Sasaki Y, Takayama J. Endoscopic thyroidectomy and para­thyroidectomy by the axillary approach. A prelimi­nary report. Surg Endosc. 2002;16(1):92–5.
150. Jeong JJ, Kang SW, Yun JS, Sung TY, Lee SC, Lee YS, etal. Comparative study of endoscopic thyroid­ectomy versus conventional open thyroidectomy in papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC) patients. J Surg Oncol. 2009;100(6):477–80.
151. Chung YS, Choe JH, Kang KH, Kim SW, Chung KW, Park KS, et al. Endoscopic thyroidectomy for thyroid malignancies: comparison with con­ventional open thyroidectomy. World J Surg. 2007;31(12):2302–6.
152. Kang SW, Lee SH, Park JH, Jeong JS, Park S, Lee CR, etal. A comparative study of the surgical outcomes of robotic and conventional open modi­ed radical neck dissection for papillary thyroid carcinoma with lateral neck node metastasis. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(11):3251–7.
153. Lee J, Chung WY.Current status of robotic thyroid­ectomy and neck dissection using a gasless transaxil­lary approach. Curr Opin Oncol. 2012;24(1):7–15.
154. Agcaoglu O, Aliyev S, Siperstein A, Berber E. Robotic transaxillary central neck dissection: video description of the technique. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2012;22(4):e197–8.
155. Koh YW, Park JH, Kim JW, Lee SW, Choi EC. Endoscopic hemithyroidectomy with prophy­lactic ipsilateral central neck dissection via a unilat­eral axillo-breast approach without gas insufation for unilateral micropapillary thyroid carcinoma: pre­liminary report. Surg Endosc. 2010;24(1):188–97.
156. Kim WS, Hong HJ, Shin YS, Choi EC, Choi HS, Koh YW.Increasing the size limit of benign thyroid lesions resectable by endoscopic thyroidectomy via a unilateral axillo-breast approach without gas insuf­ation. World J Surg. 2011;35(10):2203–11.
157. Lee D, Nam Y, Sung K. Single-incision endo­scopic thyroidectomy by the axillary approach. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech. 2010;20(10): 839–42.
158. Fan Y, Wu SD, Kong J. Single-port access trans­axillary totally endoscopic thyroidectomy: a new approach for minimally invasive thyroid opera­tion. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2011;21(3): 243–37.
159. Witzel K, von Radhen BHA, Kaminski C, Stein HJ.Transoral access for endoscopic thyroid resec­tion. Surg Endosc. 2008;22:1871–5.
160. Choe JH, Kim SW, Chung KW, Park KS, Han W, Noh DY, et al. Endoscopic thyroidectomy using a new bilateral axillo-breast approach. World J Surg. 2007;31(3):601–6.
161. Duh QY. Presidential address: minimally invasive endocrine surgery—standard of treatment or hype? Surgery. 2003;134(6):849–57.
162. Kim SJ, Lee KE, Myong JP, Kwon MR, Youn YK.Recovery of sensation in the anterior chest area after bilateral axillo-breast approach endoscopic/ robotic thyroidectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2011;21(5):366–71.
163. Lee KE, Kim HY, Park WS, Choe JH, Kwon MR, Oh SK, et al. Postauricular and axillary approach endoscopic neck surgery: a new technique. World J Surg. 2009;33(4):767–72.
164. Walvekar RR, Wallace E, Bergeron B, etal. Retro­auricular video-assisted “gasless” thyroidectomy: feasibility study in human cadavers. Surg Endosc. 2010;24(11):2895–9.
165. Benhidjeb T, Wilhelm T, Harlaar J, Kleinrensink GJ, Schneider TA, Stark M. Natural orice surgery on thyroid gland: totally transoral video-assisted thyroidectomy (TOVAT): report of rst experimen­tal results of a new surgical method. Surg Endosc. 2009;23(5):1119–20.
166. Karakas E, Steinfeldt T, Gockel A, Schlosshauer T, Dietz C, Jäger J, etal. Transoral thyroid and para­thyroid surgery— development of a new transoral technique. Surgery. 2011;150(1):108–15.
167. Miccoli P, Materazzi G, Berti P. Natural orice surgery on the thyroid gland using totally transoral video-assisted thyroidectomy: report of the rst experimental results for a new surgical method: are we going in the right direction? Surg Endosc. 2010;24(4):957–8.
168. Dionigi G, Rovera F, Boni L, Commentary on transoral access for endoscopic thyroid resection: Witzel K, von Rahden BH, Kaminski C, Stein HJ.Transoral access for endoscopic thyroid resec­tion. Surg Endosc. 2008;22(8):1871–5. Surg Endosc 2009;23(2):454–55; discussion 456
169. Lee J, Chung WY. Robotic thyroidectomy and neck dissection: past, present and future. Cancer J. 2013;19:151–61.
170. Axente DD, Silaghi H, Silaghi CA, Major ZZ, Micu CM, Constantea NA, et al. Operative out­comes of robot-assisted transaxillary thyroid surgery for benign thyroid disease: early expe­rience in 50 patients. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg. 2013;398:887–984.
171. Ban EJ, Yoo JY, Kim WW, Son HY, Park S, Lee SH, etal. Surgical complications after robotic thy­roidectomy for thyroid carcinoma: a single cen­ter experience with 3000 patients. Surg Endosc. 2014;28:2555–63.
172. Lee J, Chung WY.Robotic surgery for thyroid dis­ease. Eur Thyroid J. 2013;2:93–101.
173. Rabinovics N, Aidan P.Robotic transaxillary thyroid surgery. Gland Surg. 2015;4:397–402.
174. Son H, Park S, Lee CR, Lee S, Kim JW, Kang SW, et al. Factors contributing to surgical outcomes of transaxillary robotic thyroidectomy for papillary thyroid carcinoma. Surg Endosc. 2014;28:3134–42.
t.me/Dr_Mouayyad_AlbtousH
438
M. Sakr
175. Berber E, Bernet V, Fahey TJ 3rd, Kebebew E, Shaha A, Stack BC Jr, etal. American Thyroid Association statement on remote-access thyroid surgery. Thyroid. 2016;26:331–7.
176. Kukora SS, Hardy SD. Complications of thyroid and parathyroid surgery. In: Hardy JD, editor. Complications in surgery and their management. 4th ed. WE Saunders Co; 1981. p.295–312.
177. Lang BH, Wong CK, Tsang JS, Wong KP, Wan KY.A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing surgically-related complications between robotic­assisted thyroidectomy and conventional open thy­roidectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21:850–61.
178. Adam MA, Speicher P, Pura J, Dinan MA, Reed SD, Roman SA, etal. Robotic thyroidectomy for cancer in the US: patterns of use and short-term outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21:3859–64.
179. Lee S, Lee CR, Lee SC, Park S, Kim HY, Son H, et al. Surgical completeness of robotic thyroidec­tomy: a prospective comparison with conventional open thyroidectomy in papillary thyroid carcinoma patients. Surg Endosc. 2014;28:1068–75.
180. Tae K, Song CM, Ji YB, Kim KR, Kim JY, Choi YY. Comparison of surgical completeness between robotic total thyroidectomy versus open thyroidec­tomy. Laryngoscope. 2014;124:1042–7.
181. Sung ES, Ji YB, Song CM, Yun BR, Chung WS, Tae K. Robotic thyroidectomy: comparison of a post­auricular facelift approach with a gasless unilateral axillary approach. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016;154:997–1004.
182. Richmon JD, Holsinger FC, Kandil E, Moore MW, Garcia JA, Tufano RP. Transoral robotic-assisted thyroidectomy with central neck dissection: preclini­cal cadaver feasibility study and proposed surgical technique. J Robot Surg. 2011;5:279–82.
183. Cabot JC, Lee CR, Brunaud L, Kleiman DA, Chung WY, Fahey TJ 3rd, et al. Robotic and endoscopic transaxillary thyroidectomies may be cost prohibi­tive when compared to standard cervical thyroidec­tomy. Surgery. 2012;152:1016–24.
184. Kandil EH, Noureldine SI, Yao L, Slakey DP.Robotic transaxillary thyroidectomy: an exami­nation of the rst one hundred cases. J Am Coll Surg. 2012;214:558–64.
185. Lee J, Yun JH, Nam KH, Soh EY, Chung WY.The learning curve for robotic thyroidectomy: a multi­center study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:226–32.
186. Kang SW, Lee SC, Lee SH, Lee KY, Jeong JJ, Lee YS, etal. Robotic thyroid surgery using a gasless, transaxillary approach and the da Vinci S system: the operative outcomes of 338 consecutive patients. Surgery. 2009;146:1048–55.
187. Terris DJ, Singer MC, Seybt MW.Robotic facelift thyroidectomy: patient selection and technical con­siderations. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2011;21:237–42.
188. Chang EH, Kim HY, Koh YW, Chung WY. Overview of robotic thyroidectomy. Gland Surg. 2017;6(3):218–28.
189. Lee J, Nah KY, Kim RM, Ahn YH, Soh EY, Chung WY. Differences in postoperative outcomes, func­tion, and cosmesis: open versus robotic thyroidec­tomy. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:3186–94.
190. Son SK, Kim JH, Bae JS, Lee SH.Surgical safety and oncologic effectiveness in robotic versus con­ventional open thyroidectomy in thyroid cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:3022–32.
191. Terris DJ, Singer MC, Seybt MW.Robotic facelift thyroidectomy: II. Clinical feasibility and safety. Laryngoscope. 2011;121:1636–41.
192. Kuppersmith RB, Holsinger FC. Robotic thyroid surgery: an initial experience with North American patients. Laryngoscope. 2011;121:521–6.
193. Byeon HK, Kim DH, Chang JW, Ban MJ, Park JH, Kim WS, et al. Comprehensive application of robotic retroauricular thyroidectomy: the evo­lution of robotic thyroidectomy. Laryngoscope. 2016;126:1952–7.
194. Lee HY, You JY, Woo SU, Son GS, Lee JB, Bae JW, etal. Transoral periosteal thyroidectomy: cadaver to human. Surg Endosc. 2015;29:898–904.
195. Beahrs OH, Sakulsky SB.Surgical thyroidectomy in the management of exophthalmic goiter. Arch Surg. 1968;96(4):512–6.
196. Weitensfelder W, Lexer G, Aigner H, Fellinger H, Trattnig J, Grünbacher G.Long-term laryngoscopic follow-up vocal cord paralysis following struma sur­gery. Chirug. 1989;60:29–32.
197. Jatzko GR, Lisborg PH, Müller MG, Wette VM.Recurrent nerve palsy after thyroid operations-
-principal nerve identication and a literature review. Surgery. 1994;115(2):139–44.
198. Roeher HD, Goretzki PE.Management of goiter and thyroid nodules in an area of endemic goiter. Surg Clin North Am. 1987;67:233–7.
199. Levin K, Clark A, Duh QY, Demeure M, Siperstein AE, Clark OH.Reoperative thyroid surgery. Surgery. 1992;11:604–6.
200. Kraimps JL, Marechaud R, Gineste D, Fieuzal S, Metaye T, Carretier M, et al. Analysis and pre­vention of recurrent goiter. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1993;176:319–22.
201. Al-Suliman NN, Ryttov NF, Qvist N, Blichert-Toft M, Graversen HP.Experience in a specialist thyroid surgery unit: a demographic study, surgical compli­cations, and outcome. Eur J Surg. 1997;163:13–20.
202. Menegaux F, Turpin G, Dahman M, Leenhardt L, Chadarevian R, Aurengo A, et al. Secondary thy­roidectomy in patients with prior thyroid surgery for benign disease: a study of 203 cases. Surgery. 1999;126:479–83.
203. Harness J, Heerden J, Lennquist S, Rothmund M, Barraclough BH, Goode AW, etal. Future of thy­roid surgery and training surgeons to meet the expectations of 2000 and beyond. World J Surg. 2000;24:976–82.
204. Luft HS, Bunker JP, Enthoven AC.Should opera­tions be regionalized? The empirical relation
t.me/Dr_Mouayyad_AlbtousH
14 Thyroidectomy Procedures
439
between surgical volume and mortality. N Engl J. 1979;301:1364–9.
205. Hannan EL, O’Donnell JF, Kilburn H, Bernard HR, Yazici A.Investigation of the relationship between volume and mortality for surgical procedures performed in New York State hospitals. JAMA. 1989;262:503–10.
206. Begg CB, Cramer LD, Hoskins WJ. Impact of hos­pital volume on operative mortality for major cancer surgery. JAMA. 1998;280:1747–51.
207. Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EV.Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J. 2002;346:1128–37.
208. Birkmeyer JD, Finlayson EV, Birkmeyer BS.Volume standards for high-risk surgical procedures: poten­tial benets of the Leapfrog initiative. Surgery. 2001;130:415–22.
209. Manouras A, Markogiannakis H, Koutras AS, Antonakis PT, Drimousis P, Lagoudianakis EE, etal. Thyroid surgery: comparison between the elec­trothermal bipolar vessel sealing system, harmonic scalpel, and classic suture ligation. Am J Surg. 2008;195(1):48–52.
210. Franko J, Kish KJ, Pezzi CM, Pak H, Kukora JS.Safely increasing the efciency of thyroidectomy using a new bipolar electrosealing device (LigaSure) versus conventional clamp-andtie technique. Am Surg. 2006;72(2):132–6.
211. Shen WT, Baumbusch MA, Kebebew E, Duh QY.Use of the electrothermal vessel sealing system versus standard vessel ligation in thyroidectomy. Asian J Surg. 2005;28(2):86–9.
212. Cordon C, Fajardo R, Ramirez J, Herrera MF. A randomized, prospective, parallel group study com­paring the harmonic scalpel to electrocautery in thy­roidectomy. Surgery. 2005;137(3):337–41.
213. Kilic M, Keskek M, Ertan T, Yoldas O, Bilgin A, Koc M.A prospective randomized trial comparing the harmonic scalpel with conventional knot tying in thyroidectomy. Adv Ther. 2007;24(3):632–8.
214. Kaplan EL.Thyroid and parathyroid. In: Schwartz SI, Shires CT, Spencer FO, Storer EU, editors. Principles of surgery. 9th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2009. p.1545.
215. Kukora SS, Hardy SD. Complications of thyroid and parathyroid surgery. In: Hardy JD, editor. Complications in surgery and their management. 4th ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders Co; 1981. p.295–312.
216. Dudley HAF.Thyroid. In: Williamson RC, Waxman BP, editors. An aid to clinical surgery. 6th ed. London, UK: Churchill Livingstone; 1998. p.107–20.
217. Harness JK, Fung L, Thompson NW, Thompson NW, Burney RE, McLeod MK. Total thyroidec­tomy: complications and technique. World J Surg. 1986;10:781–6.
218. Roy van Zuidewijn DB, Songun I, Kievit J, van de Velde CJ. Complications of thyroid surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 1995;2:56–60.
219. Songun I, Kievit J, van de Velde CJH.Complications of thyroid surgery. In: Clark OH, Duh Q-Y, editors. Textbook of endocrine surgery. 1st ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 1997. p.167–74.
220. Olson JA Jr, DeBenedetti MK, Baumann DS, Wells SA Jr. Parathyroid autotransplantation during thy­roidectomy. Results of long-term follow-up. Ann Surg. 1996;223:472–8.
221. Sakr M. Post-thyroidectomy hypocalcemia. In: Sakr M, editor. Thyroid disease: challenges and debates (Chapter 9). Switzerland: Springer Nature Switzerland AG; 2020. p.599–662.
t.me/Dr_Mouayyad_AlbtousH
Surgery ofParathyroid Glands
TomR.Kurzawinski
15
15.1 Introduction
Parathyroid glands were the last major organ to be discovered (1850), perhaps a testimony to their small size, varied location, and puzzling physiology. Their role in calcium metabolism and parathyroid hormone (PTH) excess and de­ciency was dened in the rst half of XX century. Recent recognition of PTH structure, cloning of receptors, and discovery of genes responsible for familial syndromes, complemented our current understanding of their role in health and disease.
Hyperparathyroidism (HPT) was initially thought to be rare and always presenting with advanced renal and skeletal pathology. Nowadays, it is considered a common endocrine disorder, four times more common in women than men, with rising incidence of 25–30 new cases per 100,000 per year and prevalence of 1–7in 1000. It is the third commonest endocrine condition after thyroid disease and diabetes (prevalence 1in 13 and 1in 17, respectively) and frequently diagnosed in asymptomatic patients.
Series of successful parathyroidectomies per­formed from 1925 onward, established surgery as foremost treatment of HPT, the position it still holds today. Number of patients with HPT referred for surgery is increasing at the time when
T. R. Kurzawinski (*) GI Surgery, University College Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK e-mail: tom.kurzawinski@nhs.net
global healthcare funding is under severe pres­sure. Parathyroid surgeons must adopt pragmatic approach when choosing diagnostic tests (not to over investigate), selecting right operations (sim­pler, better), aiming for excellent outcomes (to meet high expectations of our patients), and to achieve all of these in most cost-effective way (government priority).
15.2 Anatomy
Normal parathyroid glands are bean-shaped structures measuring 2×4×6mm, orange brown in color with an average weight of 30mg each. Majority of patients (90%) have 4 parathyroids, but it is possible to have more (5%) or less (5%) than 4 glands. Parathyroid glands develop in tan­dem with thyroid from pharyngeal pouches, 2 inferior glands arising from third and 2 superior from fourth pharyngeal pouches. Embryologic development explains their varied locations in the neck and mediastinum. Superior glands are most frequently found within 1cm of RLN cross­ing inferior thyroid artery. Inferior glands are more variable but most are found at inferior pole of thyroid. Ectopic glands could be found behind the esophagus, in the mediastinum, thyro-thymic ligament, and carotid sheath. Parathyroids are frequently enmeshed within brous thyroid cap­sule, but location deep within thyroid is rare (0.1%). Inferior thyroid artery supplies majority
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2024 M. Sakr (ed.), Head and Neck and Endocrine Surgery,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-64102-2_15
t.me/Dr_Mouayyad_AlbtousH
441
442
T. R. Kurzawinski
of them (80%). Parathyroids are composed mainly of chief cells secreting PTH and oxyphil cells supporting them metabolically [1].
15.3 Physiology
Parathyroid glands regulate calcium homeostasis by modulating bone metabolism and absorption of calcium in kidney and intestine. Changes in calcium concentration are sensed by calcium sensing receptor (CaSR) on chief cells and lead to rapid alterations in parathyroid hormone syn­thesis and secretion. Human PTH is a linear poly­peptide synthesized by chief cells as a part of large molecule and trimmed intracellularly to active hormone containing 84 amino acids. In response to hypocalcaemia, PTH is released from secretory granules and acts directly on bone (osteoclasts) and kidney (distal nephron) increas­ing calcium reabsorption. It also regulates forma­tion of D3 (proximal tubules) and by this action increase calcium absorption from intestine. Circulating PTH is metabolized in liver and kid­neys, and its biological ½ life is 5min [2].
15.4 Pathology
Hyperparathyroidism is an abnormal state of cal­cium homeostasis where one or many parathy­roid glands secrete inappropriately large amount of PTH.Classication of HPT into primary, sec-
ondary, and tertiary reects different mechanisms by which excess of parathyroid hormone devel­ops. Primary HPT (PHPT) is commonest of the three and indicates that abnormal changes occurred rst within parathyroid gland itself. Pathological changes causing enlargement and increased inappropriate secretion of PTH include formation of adenoma (single 80%, double 4%), hyperplasia (15%), and rarely cancer (1%). Distinction between hyperplasia and adenoma is difcult and is based on nding a rim on normal parathyroid tissue at the periphery of the ade­noma. Secondary HPT is caused by prolonged hypocalcaemia due to chronic renal disease, low vitamin D (rickets), or malabsorption. Low cal­cium stimulates parathyroid glands leading to compensatory hypertrophy and increased output of PTH.Despite high PTH levels calcium remains low and in early stages secondary HPT can be reversed (e.g. renal transplant).
Long lasting secondary HPT can lead to development of parathyroid nodules autono­mously secreting PTH resulting in rising cal­cium level, a condition known as tertiary HPT. Hyperparathyroidism could be sporadic or familial. Familial HPT accounts for 1–2% of cases of HPT in adults but 24–46% in children. Familial HPT is caused by inherited or de novo mutations of genes responsible for multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 and 2a (MEN1 and MEN2a), hyperparathyroidism jaw tumour syn­drome (HPT-JT), and familial isolated HPT (FIHPT) (Table15.1).
t.me/Dr_Mouayyad_AlbtousH
15 Surgery ofParathyroid Glands
Table 15.1 Familial causes of primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT)
Inheritance and
Condition MEN 1 Autosomal
MEN 2A Autosomal
JTHPT Autosomal
FIHPT Different
FHH/ NSHPT
mutation Organs affected
Parathyroid (90%), neuroendocrine tumors (NET) of the pancreas and dominant MEN1 gene on chromosome 11
dominant MEN2A gene on chromosome 10
dominant HRPT2 gene on chromosome 1
mutations: MEN1, CaSR, HRPT2
Autosomal dominant CaSR gene
gastrointestinal tract (60%), pituitary adenomas (30%), NET of thymus and
bronchus, adrenal hyperplasia and adenomas, lipomas, leiomyomas, and skin
disorders such as angiobiromas and collagenomas
Parathyroid (20–30%), medullary thyroid carcinoma and adrenal
phaeochromocytomas
Mainly HPT and bro-osseous lesions of mandible and maxilla. Risk of
parathyroid carcinoma in 10–15%. Associated with renal lesions–renal cell
carcinoma, Wilm’s tumor, hamartomas, and cysts
Parathyroid gland
with high calcium. Nowadays, diagnosis of
15.5 Clinical Presentation
PHPT is made earlier. Approximately, 80–85%
of patients are diagnosed with biochemical A range of clinical symptoms caused by pro­longed oversecretion of PTH and hypercalcemia
abnormalities before they develop any
symptoms. vary from inconspicuous (fatigue) to painful (renal colic) and dangerous (hypercalcemic cri­sis). Hypercalcuria can lead to kidney stones,
15.6 Investigations
nephrocalcinosis, renal impairment, and nephro­genic diabetes insipidus. Prolonged reabsorption of calcium from the bones causes osteopenia, osteoporosis, and in severe cases bone deformity known as osteitis brosa cystica. Weakened bones can cause bone pain and increase risks of fractures of long bones and collapse of vertebrae. Persistently elevated calcium levels can cause abdominal pain, frequently nonspecic but some­times associated with peptic ulcer or pancreatitis. Other presentations include neuropsychiatric dis­orders, muscle weakness and pain, depression, and fatigue. Very high, untreated calcium levels can cause hypercalcemic crisis and present as thirst, nausea, vomiting, and lead to dehydration, confusion, coma, ventricular arrhythmias, and death [35].
In the past, most patients presented with severe complications but introduction of auto­mated multichannel analyzers in 1970s dramati­cally increased number of patients diagnosed
Biochemical tests: The diagnosis of PHPT is established by measuring serum calcium and PTH, which shows hypercalcemia and inappro­priately high PTH levels. Routine biochemical assessment of patients with PHPT should include renal function tests and vitamin D3 levels. In asymptomatic patients presenting with a mild hypercalcemia, marginally elevated PTH, and hypocalcuria, the diagnosis of FHH should be excluded by measuring the calcium to creatinine ratio (low in FHH). Genetic testing for mutations of the CaSR could be used in ambiguous cases. This is important, as FHH is a benign disease with no end-organ damage and does not need treatment. Bone density scan and ultrasound of the kidneys should be considered.
Genetic mutations causing HPT are rare in adults but frequent in children. Positive genetic test is helpful in establishing diagnosis of familial HPT, planning treatment, and initiating biochemi-
443
t.me/Dr_Mouayyad_AlbtousH
444
cal and genetic screening of other members of family. In patients with positive family history, testing for mutations should start with the MENIN gene [6] followed by parabrinomin (HRPT2) gene [79] if the gland is an atypical adenoma or carcinoma. RET mutation analysis is recom­mended for patients with features consistent with MEN2a [10]. Alternative to sequential genetic screening described above is to perform an analy­sis of all genetic mutations associated with hyper­parathyroidism at once. Currently available panel of genetic tests include MEN1 and 2, CaSR, CDC73, CDKN 1A, 1B, 2B, 2C and is cheaper than performing these tests separately.
Imaging of abnormal parathyroid glands is a critical part of the preoperative workup espe­cially in patients with sporadic PHPT.Its role is to identify the position of enlarged gland in the neck or mediastinum and differentiate between single and multiple glands disease. Identication of a single enlarged gland by using two different imaging techniques (concordant ndings) enables surgeon to plan minimally invasive approach. Imaging is less helpful in familial and renal HPT when neck exploration and removal of multiple glands is usually required. In these situations, embarking on surgery without localization stud­ies is acceptable [11].
Ultrasound (US) scanning of the neck is usu­ally performed using a high-frequency (12–15 MHz) transducer, which enables the detection of enlarged parathyroid glands, descrip­tion of their size and position in relation to thy­roid and other anatomical structures (Fig.15.1). Adenomas typically appear as homogenously echoic nodules on gray scale and are highly vas­cular on color Doppler imaging. Limitations of US include difculty in identifying adenomas, which are either deep-seated (retro-sternal/medi­astinal) or related to air-lled structures such as the trachea and esophagus. In addition, US is an operator-dependent investigation, and therefore outcomes will tend to relate to the level of experi­ence of the centre and individual radiologist.
Nuclear imaging is usually performed with
99m
([
Tc] methoxyisobutylnitrile (MIBI)), which avidly localizes in mitochondria present in large numbers in the oxyphil cells of parathyroid tis-
T. R. Kurzawinski
Fig. 15.1 Ultrasound image clearly demonstrating an enlarged parathyroid gland
sue. Parathyroid adenomas and to lesser degree hyperplastic glands demonstrate higher tracer uptake in the early stage and delayed washout in the late image as compared to the surrounding thyroid tissue. The use of SPECT, which pro­duces 3D images from two cameras, has been shown to improve its sensitivity [12] (Fig.15.2). Nuclear imaging is better than ultrasound at detecting ectopic adenomas. However, in the presence of thyroid nodules, differentiation of the abnormal parathyroid and thyroid tissue can be difcult. A systematic review of 54 studies iden­tied the sensitivity of ultrasound to be 78% in detecting solitary adenomas, 35% in hyperplasia, and 16% in double adenomas. The sensitivity of MIBI was 88% in detecting solitary adenomas, 44% in detecting hyperplastic glands, and 30% in detecting double adenomas [13].
Computed tomography (CT), magnetic reso-
nance imaging (MRI), and venous sampling are
rarely required in modern practice and should be reserved for cases where standard investigations are negative or in recurrent HPT requiring reop­eration. Axial, thin cuts, contrast-enhanced CT images from the base of the skull through the mediastinum can help to identify abnormal para­thyroids in the neck not seen on other scans and ectopic glands in the mediastinum. MRI is lim­ited by similar appearances of cervical lymph nodes and parathyroid adenomas and venous sampling is an invasive test, which is now almost completely obsolete [14].
t.me/Dr_Mouayyad_AlbtousH