Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_688_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
56 Мб
Скачать
424
https://t.me/medicina_free
11 Lips/Chin
Island Advancement Flap
Indications: Medium-/large-sized defects.
Technique: The defect is modied to obtain parallel lateral margins and extended
superiorly and inferiorly to the base of nose and vermillion border, if necessary, to best camouage the scars. Curvilinear incisions are made from the superior and inferior margins of the defect, to delineate a triangular skin island, at least two to three times the length of the defect. The ap is oriented along the melolabial fold. The incision is deepened only through the skin along the entire outline of the ap. The central subcutaneous tissue, beneath the ap is preserved to provide the vascu­larity. The ap subcutaneous tissue closest and furthest from the defect is released incrementally to obtain the necessary mobility. The ap is mobilised into the defect, and wound is closed in layers (Fig.11.23a–c, d–h, i–o).
Tips: The defect can be enlarged to occupy the whole subunit for best position-
ing of the scars. Maintain adequate width of the ap to avoid distortion of the ver­million border and nasal base. The size of the skin pedicle will also determine the extent of safe subcutaneous dissection. It is mandatory to retain an adequate subcu­taneous island pedicle, the size of which needs to take into account additional tissue release that might be required to obtain the necessary mobility.
b
Upper Lip (Philtrum/Lateral)
https://t.me/medicina_free
a
425
c
Fig. 11.23 Island advancement ap. (a) Markings for excision and ap, (b) Excision defect and ap raised, (c) Final closure, (d) Markings for excision, (e) Markings for excision and ap, (f) Excision defect, (g) Flap mobilised into defect, (h) Final closure, (i) Markings for excision, (j) Markings for excision and ap, (k) Excision defect, (l) Flap incisions, (m) Subcutaneous pedicle, (n) Flap mobilised into defect, (o) Final closure
d
426
https://t.me/medicina_free
11 Lips/Chin
e
f
gh
Fig. 11.23 (continued)
Upper Lip (Philtrum/Lateral)
https://t.me/medicina_free
427
i
j
kl
Fig. 11.23 (continued)
428
https://t.me/medicina_free
11 Lips/Chin
m
o
n
Fig. 11.23 (continued)
Upper Lip (Philtrum/Lateral)
https://t.me/medicina_free
429
Inferiorly Based Nasolabial Flap
This is a random pattern ap, though it overlies the course of the facial vessels.
Indications: Medium-sized defect of a variety of shapes. Technique: The defect is modied to obtain parallel lateral wound edges and
extended inferiorly and superiorly to the vermillion border and nasal base. The ap is raised along the nasolabial fold, with one of its margins also forming the margin of the defect. A trial transfer and template can help determine the size of the ap. The overall length of the ap is planned to be longer to accommodate any loss of effective length and the tip triangulated to help primary closure. The base of the ap is designed to be wider than the tip to maintain vascularity. The ap is raised in the subcutaneous plane. The wound margins are undermined, the ap is mobilised into the defect, and the wound is closed in layers (Fig.11.24a–d, e–i).
Tips: There is a tendency for “pin cushioning” with circular defects, and it also
makes it difcult to place the scars along RSTL (see superiorly based nasolabial ap—Fig. 11.5a–d). The width of the ap should be adequate to prevent displace­ment of the vermillion and nasal base.
430
ab
https://t.me/medicina_free
11 Lips/Chin
c
d
e
Fig. 11.24 Inferiorly based nasolabial ap. (a) Markings for excision and ap, (b) Excision defect and ap raised, (c) Flap mobilised into defect, (d) Final closure, (e) Lesion upper lip, (f) Markings for excision and ap, (g) Excision dfect and ap raised, (h) Fianl closure, (i) Early post operative appearance
f
gh
Upper Lip (Philtrum/Lateral)
https://t.me/medicina_free
i
431
Fig. 11.24 (continued)
432
https://t.me/medicina_free
11 Lips/Chin
Full-Thickness Defects
Philtrum/Lateral Defects
Primary Closure (Shield Rather Than Simple “V” Excision)
Indication: Small defects up to 1/3rd of the lip.
Technique: The lesion is marked with adequate margins, and the excision is
planned to leave a “shield” shaped defect, with parallel wound edge inferiorly and triangulated margins superiorly to facilitate primary closure. The axis of the exci­sion is made along the perioral rhytids. The wound is closed in three layers (mucosa, muscle and skin), taking care to accurately align the vermillion border (Fig.11.25a–c).
Tips: A “shield” excision rather than a “V” allows the tension to be evenly dis-
tributed across a larger area. Getting an assistant to squeeze the lips, during the resection aids control of the labial arteries for haemostasis.
Full-Thickness Defects
https://t.me/medicina_free
433
a
b
c
Fig. 11.25 Excision and primary closure. (a) Markings for excision, (b) Excision defect, (c) Final closure