Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_2622_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
57 Мб
Скачать
Multiple Choice Questions
4.1. In the investigation of allergy, which of the following statements are correct?
A. Mast cell tryptase is labile in serum and therefore not a useful
biomarker of mast cell activation B. Measurement of total IgE is not useful C. Component resolved diagnostics can have predictive value in
some food allergies D. Skin testing is not affected by antihistamine medication E. Some antidepressant medications can lead to false-negative
skin test results
Answer: B, C and E.
CD8 T cells, not CD4 T cells, kill infected cells directly through the production of pore-forming molecules such as perforin and release of enzymes triggering apoptosis of the target cell. CD8 T cells are particu­larly important in defence against viral infection. Th1 (T-helper) cells typ­ically produce IL-2, IFN-γ and TNF-α, and support the development of delayed-type hypersensitivity responses. T-regulatory cells (T regs) are a subset of specialised CD4+ lymphocytes important in actively suppress­ing activation of other cells and preventing autoimmune disease. They produce cytokines such as TGF-beta and IL-10. Th17 cells are pro-in­ammatory cells dened by their production of IL-17. They have a key role in defence against extracellular bacteria and fungi. They also have a role in the development of autoimmune disease.
Answer: C and E.
Mast cell tryptase is stable in serum, making it a particularly con­venient biomarker of mast cell activation. A total IgE can be helpful in atopic patients as a high total level can be associated with false-positive specic IgEs. Component resolved diagnostics uses puried native or recombinant allergens to detect specic IgE directed against individual allergenic molecules. CRD can discriminate genuine sensitisation from sensitisation due to cross reactivity and in some cases can be used in risk stratication, having predictive value, such as in peanut and some nut allergy. A number of medications, including certain antidepressant classes, can have antihistamine properties and thereby interfere with skin testing. Patients should be advised to discontinue interacting medica­tions in advance of testing.
4.2. Which of the following are required for naïve T-cell activation?
A. Antigen processing by antigen-presenting cells B. Antigenic peptide presentation by pattern recognition
receptors C. HLA class 1 for CD4 T cells D. Co-stimulatory molecules E. Intracellular T-cell signalling
Answer: A, D and E.
Unlike B cells, which recognise native antigen, T cells require antigen processing through professional antigen-presenting cells, with presenta­tion of antigenic peptide by self-HLA molecules expressed at the APC surface. The Ag–HLA complex then interacts with the T-cell receptor. Pattern recognition receptors are expressed by phagocytic cells and recognise pathogen-associated molecular patterns on invading micro­org anisms. They do not present antigen to T cells. CD4 T cells recognise antigenic peptide presented by HLA class II molecules; CD8 T cells rec­ognise antigenic peptide presented by HLA class I molecules. A second signal, known as co-stimulation, is required for naïve T-cell activation. Downstream intracellular T cells signalling then drives T-cell proliferation.
4.3. Which of the following statements are correct regarding T-cell
populations?
4.4. In tumour immunology, which of the following statements are correct?
A. NK cells have an important role in immune surveillance B. Tumour cells reliably express HLA molecules to allow immune
recognition by T cells
C. Immune checkpoint blockade includes anti-CTLA and
anti-PD1 pathways
D. Autoimmune disease is a recognised complication of immune
checkpoint blockade in tumour therapy
E. Tumour progression occurs rapidly if immune checkpoint
blockade is withdrawn
Answer: A, C and D.
NK cells have an important role in tumour surveillance especially as tumour cells lose their HLA expression, thereby allowing NK cell activa­tion. Loss of HLA expression is one of the mechanisms by which tumours can evade T-cell immunity. Immune checkpoint blockade includes anti­bodies directed at the normally downregulatory pathways, thereby allow­ing immune cells to be active against the tumour. Some patients maintain the anti-tumour effect of immune checkpoint blockade despite treatment withdrawal in the event of drug toxicity.
4.5. In the context of organ transplantation, which of the following
statements are correct?
A. The major complications are graft rejection, drug toxicity and
infection
B. HLA incompatibility does not have a bearing on transplant
outcome
C. Acute cellular rejection is predominantly mediated by activated
B cells
D. Post-transplantation, failure to control viral infections
associated with malignant transformation leads to an increased risk of malignancy
E. Co-stimulatory blockade has no role in post-transplant immune
suppression
Answer: A and D.
A. CD4 T cells kill virally infected cells through production of pore-
forming molecules such as perforin and release of enzymes
triggering apoptosis of the target cell B. CD8 T cells are important in defence against viral infection C. Th1 (T-helper) cells typically produce IL-2, IFN γ and TNF-α D. T regs are regulatory CD4 T cells that promote activation of
other cells and augment autoimmune disease
E. Th-17 cells are pro-inammatory cells that produce IL-17 and
have a key role in defence against extracellular bacteria and
fungi
The major complications of transplantation are graft rejection, drug toxicity and infection consequent to immunosuppression. Solid organ transplantation stimulates an aggressive immune response by the recip­ient, unless the transplant is between monozygotic twins. The most important genetic determinant is the difference between donor and recipient HLA proteins. The polymorphism of these proteins means that donor HLA antigens are almost invariably recognised as foreign by the recipient immune system, unless an active attempt has been made to minimise incompatibility. Acute cellular rejection is mediated by activated T lymphocytes and results in deterioration in graft function. The risk of
post-transplant malignancy arises because T-cell suppression results in
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
failure to control viral infections associated with malignant transforma­tion, e.g. lymphoma associated with Epstein–Barr virus, Kaposi's sar­coma associated with human herpesvirus 8 and skin tumours associated
with human papillomavirus. Co-stimulatory blockade, using the CTLA-4 fusion protein belatacept, with high afnity for CD80/86 on T cells, selec­tively inhibits T-cell activation and has a role in post-transplant immune suppression.
H Campbell
DA McAllister
Population health and
5
epidemiology
Global burden of disease and underlying risk factors 88
Life expectancy 88 Global causes of death and disability 88 Risk factors underlying disease 88
Social determinants of health 89
The hierarchy of systems – from molecules to ecologies 89 The life course 89 Preventive medicine 89
Principles of screening and immunisation 90
Screening 90 Immunisation 91
Epidemiology 91
Understanding causes and effect 91 Mendelian randomisation 91
Health data/informatics 94
Management of epidemics 95
88  P OPU L ATI O N H EALTH AN D EP I DE M IOL O GY
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
The UK Faculty of Public Heath denes public health as ‘The science and art of promoting and protecting health and well-being, preventing ill-health and prolonging life through the organised efforts of society’. This recognises that there is a collective responsibility for the health of the population which requires partnerships between government, health services and other partners to promote and protect health and prevent disease. Population health has been dened as ‘the health outcomes of a group of individuals, including the distribution of such outcomes within the group’. Medical doctors can play a role in all these efforts to improve health both as part of their clinical work but also through supporting broader actions to improve public health.
Global burden of disease and underlying risk factors
The Global Burden of Disease (GBD) exercise was initiated by the World Bank in 1992, with rst estimates appearing in the World Development Report in 1993. Regular updated estimates have been published since that time together with projections of future disease burden. The aim of the exercise was to produce reliable and internally consistent estimates of disease burden for all diseases and injuries and to assess their physi­ological, behavioural and social risk factors so that this information could be made available to health workers, researchers and policy-makers.
The GBD exercise adopted the metric ‘disability life year’ or DALY to describe population health. This combines information about prema­ture mortality in a population (measured as Years of Life Lost from an ‘expected’ life expectancy) and years of life lived with disability (Years of Life lived with Disability (YLD), which is weighted by a severity factor). The International Classication of Disease (ICD) rules, which assign one cause to each death, are followed. All estimates are presented by age and sex groups and by regions of the world. Many countries now also report their own national burden of disease data.
Life expectancy
Global life expectancy at birth increased from 61.7 years in 1980 to 73.0 years in 2017, an increase of about 0.3 years per calendar year. This change is due to a substantial fall in child mortality (mainly due to com­mon infections) partly offset by rises in mortality from adult conditions such as diabetes and chronic kidney disease. Some areas have not shown these increases in life expectancy in men, often due to war and interpersonal violence.
Global causes of death and disability
Box 5.1 shows a ranked list of the major causes of global deaths in 2019.
Communicable, maternal, neonatal and nutritional causes accounted for about one-quarter of deaths worldwide – down from about one-third in
1990. In contrast, deaths from non-communicable diseases are increas­ing in importance and now account for about two-thirds of all deaths globally,: including about 18.5 million from cardiovascular disease (ischae­mic heart disease and stroke), 10 million from cancer and about 4 million from chronic respiratory diseases. The age standardised death rates for most diseases globally are falling. However, despite this, the numbers of deaths from many diseases are rising due to global population growth and the change in age structure of the population to older ages and this is placing an increasing burden on health systems. For a few con­ditions (e.g. HIV/AIDS, diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease) age-standardised death rates continue to rise. Within this overall pattern, signicant regional variations exist – for example, communicable, mater­nal, neonatal and nutritional causes still account for about two-thirds of premature mortality in sub-Saharan Africa.
GBD also provides estimates of disability from disease (Box 5.2). This has raised awareness of the importance of conditions like depression and other common mental health conditions, low back and neck pain
5.1 Global causes of death – top 15 ranked causes 2019 [rank in 1990]
1. Cardiovascular disease [1]
2. Neoplasms [2]
3. Chronic respiratory [6]
4. Respiratory infections and TB [3]
5. Diabetes and CKD [10]
6. Digestive diseases [8]
7. Neurological disorders [15]
8. Maternal and neonatal [15]
9. Unintentional injuries [9]
10. Enteric infections [5]
11. Transport injuries [13]
12. Self harm and violence [12]
13. Other non-communicable diseases [11]
14. HIV/AIDS and STIs [17]
15. NTDs and malaria [14]
(CKD = chronic kidney disease; TB = tuberculosis; STIs = sexually transmitted infections; NTDs = neglected tropical diseases)
From GBD 2019. https://vizhub.healthdata.org/gbd-compare/.
5.2 Global disability – top 15 ranked causes 2019 [rank in 1990]*
1. Musculoskeletal disorders [1]
2. Mental disorders [2]
3. Other non-communicable diseases [3]
4. Sense organ diseases [5]
5. Neurological disorders [4]
6. Diabetes and CKD [12]
7. Skin diseases [7]
8. Unintentional injuries [8]
9. Nutritional deciencies [6]
10. Cardiovascular diseases [11]
11. Chronic respiratory diseases [9]
12. Substance use [13]
13. Maternal and neonatal conditions [17]
14. Transport injuries [16]
15. Digestive diseases [15]
*By years of life lived with disability (YLD).
(CKD = chronic kidney disease)
From GBD 2019. https://vizhub.healthdata.org/gbd-compare/.
and other musculo-skeletal conditions, and asthma, which account for a relatively large disease burden but relatively few deaths. This in turn has resulted in greater health policy priority given to these conditions. Since the policy focus in national health systems is increasingly on keeping people healthy rather than only on reducing premature deaths it is impor­tant to have measures of these health outcomes.
It is important to recognise that although these estimates represent the best overall picture of burden of disease globally, they are based on limited and imperfect data. Nevertheless, the quality of data underlying the estimates and the modelling processes are improving steadily over time and provide an increasingly robust basis for evidence-based health planning and priority setting.
Risk factors underlying disease
Box 5.3 shows a ranked list of the main risk factors underlying GBD
in 2019 and how this ranking has changed over the past 29 years. A number of key insights have been identied in this, the most recent, GBD exercise:
 Socio-demographic development has been progressing steadily
since 1990 but it has increased faster in countries with the highest socio-demographic development index and thus gaps have been widening.
So ci al de te r mi na nts o f h ea lth  89
5.3 Global risk factors – top 10 ranked causes 2019 [rank in 1990]*
1. High blood pressure [7]
2. Smoking/second hand smoke exposure [5]
3. High fasting blood glucose [11]
4. Low birth weight [2]
5. High BMI [16]
6. Short gestation [3]
7. Ambient particulate matter pollution [13]
8. High LDL cholesterol [14]
9. Alcohol use [15]
10. Household air pollution [4]
*Risk factors ranked by % of burden of disease they cause.
(BMI = body mass index; LDL = low density lipoprotein)
From GBD 2019 Diseases and Injuries Collaborators. Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet 2020; 396:1204–1222.
 Health systems need to transform to be better able to respond to
the changing pattern of NCDs and disabilities.
 The Millennium Development Goal (MDG) programme from 2000 to
2015 has led to faster progress in reducing deaths from maternal, child and neonatal conditions/TB/HIV/malaria but this level of atten­tion now needs to be directed at NCDs.
 Public health is not giving sufcient priority to important global risk
factors which are increasing over time, such as high blood pressure, high fasting glucose, high BMI, ambient particulate matter pollution and drug and alcohol use.
 There are many challenges resulting from the change in global
population pyramid structures, which have become inverted over recent decades and now pose many health, nancial and political challenges.
Social determinants of health
Health emerges from a highly complex interaction between a person’s genetic background and environmental factors (aspects of the physical, biological (microbes), built and social environments and also distant inu­ences such as the global ecosystem) (Fig. 5.1).
The hierarchy of systems – from molecules to ecologies
o
c
s
e
y
a
b
o
l
G
n
E
c
o
L
C
y
t
s
e
e
g
n
a
h
c
e
t
a
m
C
n
c
o
i
a
l
t
a
p
e
r
s
l
c
g
a
h
n
t
d
a
e
u
W
B
Macro-economy,
politics, culture,
c
c
v
i
t
l
c
a
a
t
i
l
p
a
c
a
i
s
y
h
Age, sex and
p
o
t
e
S
i
D
global forces
i
hereditary
s
n
o
m
r
i
v
e
c
o
e
n
o
a
m
u
n
m
i
o
t
s
e
t
f
y
l
L
e
People
factors
neighbourhoods,
other regions
n
m
y
t
e
m
t
y
W
o
r
k
p
l
a
y
Other
A
i
r
B
M
w
N
e
t
w
o
r
k
s
o
a
a
d
t
r
e
v
k
r
e
e
r
t
l
s
s
a
i
n
t
y
d
Fig. 5.1 Hierarchy of systems that inuence population health. Adapted from
an original model by Whitehead M, Dahlgren G. What can be done about inequalities
in health? Lancet 1991; 338:1059–1063
5.4 ‘Hierarchy of systems’ applied to ischaemic heart disease
Level in the hierarchy Example of effect
Molecular ApoB mutation causing hypercholesterolaemia
Cellular Foam cells accumulate in vessel wall
Tissue Atheroma and thrombosis of coronary artery
Organ Ischaemia and infarction of myocardium
System Cardiac failure
Person Limited exercise capacity, impact on employment
Family Passive smoking, diet
Community Shops and leisure opportunities
Population Prevalence of obesity
Society Policies on smoking, screening for risk factors
Ecology Agriculture inuencing fat content in diet
5
Inuences on health exist at many levels and extend beyond the individual to include the family, community, population and ecology. Box 5.4 shows an example of this for determinants of coronary heart disease and demon­strates the importance of considering not only the disease process in a patient but also its context. Health care is not the only determinant – and is usually not the major determinant – of health status in the population. The concept of ‘global health’ recognises the global dimension of health prob­lems, whether these be, for example, emerging or pandemic infections or global economic inuences on health internationally.
The life course
The determinants of health operate over the whole lifespan. Values and behaviours acquired during childhood and adolescence have a pro­found inuence on educational outcomes, job prospects and risk of disease. These can have a strong inuence, for example, on whether a young person takes up a damaging behaviour like smoking, risky sexual activity and drug misuse. Inuences on health can even operate before birth. Low birth weight can lead to higher risk hypertension and
type 2 diabetes in young adults and of cardiovascular disease in mid-
dle age. It has been suggested that under-nutrition during middle to
late gestation permanently ‘programmes’ cardiovascular and metabolic
responses.
This ‘life course’ perspective highlights the cumulative effect (through each stage of life) on health of exposures to illness, adverse environmen­tal conditions and behaviours that damage health.
Preventive medicine
The complexity of the interactions between physical, social and eco­nomic determinants of health means that successful prevention is often difcult. Moreover, the life course perspective illustrates that it may be necessary to intervene early in life or even before birth, to prevent impor­tant disease in later life. Successful prevention is likely to require many interventions across the life course and at several levels in the hierarchy of systems. The examples below illustrate this principle.
90  P OPU L ATI O N H EALTH AN D EP I DE M IOL O GY
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
Alcohol
Alcohol use is an increasingly important risk factor underlying global bur­den of disease (see related harm vary by place and time but include the falling price of alcohol (in real terms), increased availability and cultural change fostering higher levels of consumption. Public, professional and governmental concern has now led to a minimum price being charged for a unit of alcohol, tightening of licensing regulations and curtailment of some promotional activity in many countries. However, even more aggressive public health measures will be needed to reverse the levels of harm in the population. The approach for individual patients suffering adverse effects of alcohol is described on pages 892 and 1240.
Box 5.3). Reasons for increasing rates of alcohol-
Smoking
Smoking is also one of the top three risk factors underlying global bur­den of disease (see Box 5.3). It is responsible for a substantial major­ity of cases of lung cancer and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and most smokers die either from these respiratory diseases or from ischaemic heart disease. Smoking also causes cancers of the upper respiratory and gastrointestinal tracts, pancreas, bladder and kidney, and increases risks of peripheral vascular disease, stroke and peptic ulcer­ation. Maternal smoking is an important cause of fetal growth retarda­tion. Moreover, there is increasing evidence that passive (‘second hand’) smoking has adverse effects on cardiovascular and respiratory health.
The decline in smoking rates in many high-income countries has been achieved not only by warning people of the health risks but also increased taxation of tobacco, banning of advertising, banning of smoking in public places and support for smoking cessation to maintain a decline in smok­ing rates. However, smoking rates remain high in many poorer areas and are increasing amongst young women. In many low-income countries, tobacco companies have found new markets and rates are rising.
There is a complex hierarchy of systems that interact to cause smokers to initiate and maintain their habit. At the molecular and cellular levels, nic­otine acts on the nervous system to create dependence and acts to main­tain the smoking habit. There are also strong inuences at the personal and social level, such as young female smokers being motivated to ‘stay thin’ or ‘look cool’ and peer pressure. Other important inuences in the wider environment include cigarette advertising, with the advertising budget of the tobacco industry being much greater than that of health services. Strategies to help individuals quit smoking (such as nicotine replacement therapy, anti-smoking advice and behavioural support) are cost-effective and form an important part of the overall anti-tobacco strategy.
Typically, with industrialisation, the pattern changes: low birth rates, low death rates and longer life expectancy. Instead of infections, chronic conditions such as heart disease dominate in an older population. Adverse health consequences of excessive afuence are also becoming apparent. Despite experiencing sustained economic growth for the last 50 years, people in many high-income countries are not growing any happier and the litany of socioeconomic problems – crime, congestion, inequality, mental health problems – persists.
Many countries are now experiencing a ‘double burden’. They have large populations still living in poverty who are suffering from problems such as diarrhoea and malnutrition, alongside afuent populations (often in cities) who suffer from chronic illness such as diabetes and heart disease.
Atmospheric pollution
Emissions from industry, power plants and motor vehicles of sulphur oxides, nitrogen oxides, respirable particles and metals are severely pol­luting cities and towns in Asia, Africa, Latin America and Eastern Europe. Increased death rates from respiratory and cardiovascular disease occur in vulnerable adults, such as those with established respiratory disease and older people, while children experience an increase in bronchitic symptoms. Low-income countries also suffer high rates of respiratory disease as a result of indoor pollution caused mainly by heating and cooking combustion.
Carbon dioxide and global warming
Climate change is arguably the world’s most important environmental health issue. A combination of increased production of carbon dioxide and habitat destruction, both caused primarily by human activity, seems to be the main cause. The temperature of the globe is rising, climate is being affected, and if the trend continues, sea levels will rise and rainfall patterns will be altered so that both droughts and oods will become more common. These have already claimed millions of lives during the past 20 years and have adversely affected the lives of many more. The economic costs of property damage and the impact on agriculture, food supplies and prosperity have also been substantial. The health impacts of global warming will also include changes in the geographical range of some vector-borne infectious diseases. Currently, politicians can­not agree on an effective framework of actions to tackle the problem. Meanwhile, the industrialised world continues with lifestyles and levels of waste that are beyond the planet’s ability to sustain.
Obesity
Obesity is an increasingly important risk factor underlying global burden of disease (see Box 5.3). The weight distribution of almost the whole population is shifting upwards – the slim are becoming less slim while the overweight and obese are becoming more so. In the UK, this translates into a 1-kilogram increase in weight per adult per year (on average over the adult population). The current obesity epidemic cannot be explained simply by individual behaviour and poor choice but also requires an understanding of the obesogenic environment that encourages people to eat more and exercise less. This includes the availability of cheap and heavily marketed energy-rich foods, the increase in labour-saving devices (e.g. elevators and remote controls) and the increase in passive transport (cars as opposed to walking, cycling, or walking to public trans­port hubs). To combat the health impact of obesity, therefore, we need to help those who are already obese but also develop strategies that impact on the whole population and reverse the obesogenic environment.
Poverty and afuence
The adverse health and social consequences of poverty are well doc­umented: high birth rates, high death rates and short life expectancy.
Principles of screening and immunisation
Screening
Screening is the application of a screening test to a large number of asymptomatic people with the aim of reducing morbidity or mortality from a disease. WHO have identied a set of (Wilson and Jungner) cri­teria to guide health systems in deciding when it is appropriate to imple­ment screening programmes. The essential criteria are:
 Is the disease an important public health problem?  Is there a suitable screening test available?  Is there a recognisable latent or early stage?  Is there effective treatment for the disease at this stage which
improves prognosis?
A suitable screening test is one that is cheap, acceptable, easy to perform, safe and gives a valid result in terms of sensitivity and specic­ity. Screening programmes should always be evaluated in trials so that robust evidence is provided in favour of their adoption. These evaluations are prone to several biases – self-selection bias, lead-time bias and length
Epidem iolog y  91
bias – and these need to be accounted for in the analysis. Examples of large-scale screening programmes in the UK include breast, colorectal and cervical cancer national screening programmes ( https://www.gov.
uk/topic/population-screening-programmes) and a number of screening
tests carried out in pregnancy and in the newborn, such as the:
 diabetic eye screening programme  fetal anomaly screening programme  infectious diseases in pregnancy screening programme  newborn and infant physical examination screening programme  newborn blood spot screening programme  newborn hearing screening programme  sickle-cell anaemia and thalassaemia screening programme.
These are illustrated in Figure 5.2
Problems with screening include:
 over-diagnosis (of a disease that would not have come to clinical
attention on its own or would not have led to death)  false reassurance  diversion of resources from investments that could control the dis-
ease more cost-effectively.
Immunisation
Immunisation can confer immunity to specic infectious diseases and be either passive (through injected antibodies, such as the monoclo­nal palivizimab against respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection given to premature infants) or active (through administration of a vaccine). Immunisation invokes antibody and/or cell-mediated immunity and can lead to both short- and longer-term protection in the person who is vaccinated. Immunisation has also been used to eradicate a dis­ease such as occurred in the smallpox eradication programme and is currently being targeted in the polio eradication programme. As well as direct effects of vaccination a number of indirect effects can occur – such as protection of individuals who are vaccinated through altering disease transmission leading to ‘herd immunity’; or reduction of antibiotic resistance through selective reduction of pneumococcal serogroups that are associated with antibiotic resistance. The UK immunisation schedule is described in detail and regularly updated in the UK government publication ‘Immunisation against infectious dis­ease’ (Green Book).
Epidemiology
Epidemiologists study disease in free-living humans, seeking to describe patterns of health and disease and to understand how different expo­sures cause or prevent disease (Box 5.5). Chronic diseases and risk factors (e.g. smoking, obesity etc.) are often described in terms of their prevalence. A prevalence is simply a proportion, for example the preva­lence of diabetes among people aged 80 and older in developed coun­tries is around 10%.
Events such as deaths, hospitalisations and rst occurrences of a dis­ease are described using incidence rates, so, for example, if there are 100 new cases of a disease in a single year in a population of 1000, the incidence rate is 105 per 1000 person-years. The rate is 105 rather than 100 because the denominator is person-time, the sum of the total ‘exposed’ time for the population, which in this example is 950 per­son-years. Person-time is the sum of the total ‘exposed’ time for the population and in this example is 950 person-years. The reason the per­son-time is less than 1000 is that 100 people experienced the event. These 100 people are assumed to have had an event, on average, half­way through the time-period, removing 100 ×0.5 person-years from the exposure-time (as it is not possible to have a rst occurrence of a disease twice).
A similar measure to the incidence rate is the cumulative incidence or risk, which is the number of new cases as a proportion of the total people at risk at the beginning of the exposure time. If in the example above the same 1000 people were observed for a year (i.e. with no one joining or leaving the group) then the one-year risk is 10% (100/1000). The time-period should always be specied for risks.
These rates and proportions are used to describe how diseases (and risk factors) vary according to time, person and place. Temporal varia­tion may occur seasonally; for example, malaria occurs in the wet sea­son but not the dry, or as longer-term ‘secular’ trends, e.g. malaria may re-emerge due to drug resistance. Person comparisons include age, sex, socio-economic status, employment, and lifestyle characteristics. Place comparisons include the local environment (e.g. urban versus rural) and international comparisons.
Understanding causes and effect
Epidemiological research complements that based on animal, cell and tissue models, the ndings of which do not always translate to humans. For example, only a minority of drug discoveries from laboratory research are found to be effective when tested in people.
However, differentiating causes from mere non-causal associations is a considerable challenge for epidemiology. This is because while labora­tory researchers can directly manipulate conditions to isolate and under­stand causes, such approaches are impossible in free-living populations. Epidemiologists have developed a different approach, based around a number of study designs (Box 5.6). Of these, the clinical trial is closest to the laboratory experiment. An early example of a clinical trial is shown in
Figure 5.3, along with ‘effect measures’ which are used to quantify the
difference in rates and risks.
In clinical trials, patients are usually randomly allocated to treatments so that, on average, groups are similar apart from the intervention of interest. Nevertheless, for any particular trial, especially a small trial, the laws of probability mean that differences can and do occur by chance. Poorly designed or executed trials can also limit comparability between groups. Allocation may not truly be random (e.g. because of inadequate concealment of the randomisation sequence), and there may be system­atic differences (biases) in the way people allocated to different groups are treated or studied.
Such biases also occur in observational epidemiological study designs, such as cohort, case–control and cross-sectional studies (see
Box 5.6). These designs are also much more subject to the problem of
confounding than are randomised trials.
Confounding is where the relationship between an exposure and out­come of interest is confused by the presence of some other causal factor. For example, coffee consumption may be associated with lung cancer because smoking is commoner among coffee-drinkers. Here, smoking is said to confound the association between coffee and lung cancer.
Despite these limitations, for most causes of diseases, randomised controlled trials are not feasible because of ethical, or more often prac­tical, considerations. Epidemiologists therefore seek to minimise bias and confounding by good study design and analysis. Epidemiologists subsequently make causal inferences by balancing the probability that an observed association has been caused by chance, bias and/or con­founding against the alternative probability that the relationship is causal. This weighing-up requires an understanding of the frequency and impor­tance of different sources of bias and confounding as well as the scien­tic rationale of the putative causal relationship. It was this approach, collectively and over a number of years, that settled the fact that smoking causes lung cancer, and, subsequently, heart disease.
Mendelian randomisation
Mendelian randomisation (MR) is a method to study whether the rela­tionship between a (modiable) risk factor and a disease may be causal. It uses genetic variation in a gene that inuences the level of the risk factor under consideration and studies the impact of this variation on
5
92  P OPU L ATI O N H EALTH AN D EP I DE M IOL O GY
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
Pre-conception
Antenatal
Blood for syphilis, hepatitis B, HIV and rubella susceptibility as early as possible, or at any stage of the pregnancy, including labour
Blood for haemoglobin,
group, rhesus and
antibodies as early as
possible, or as soon
as a woman arrives for
care, including labour
Re-offer screening for
infectious diseases if
initially declined
Newborn
For babies of hepatitis B-positive
mothers, give hepatitis B vaccination
± immunoglobulin within 24 hrs*
Blood for sickle cell
and thalassaemia
(quadruple test)
Commence
folic acid
Blood for T21,
T18 and T13
(combined test)
Blood for T21
Repeat
haemoglobin
and antibodies
Newborn
physical
examination
by 72 hrs
Newborn
hearing
screen
Infant physical
examination
at 6–8 weeks
Week
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
Birth
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
Women with type 1 or type 2 diabetes are offered diabetic eye (DE) screening annually. In pregnancy women with type 1 or type 2 diabetes are offered a DE screen when they first present for care
Early pregnancy scan to support T21, T18 and T13 screening
Detailed ultrasound scan for structural abnormalities, including T18 and T13
Give and discuss newborn screening information
Newborn blood spot screens (ideally on day 5) for: sickle cell disease (SCD), cystic fibrosis (CF), congenital hypothyroidism (CHT) and inherited metabolic diseases (PKU, MCADD, MSUD, IVA, GA1 and HCU)
Note that babies who missed the screen can be tested up to 1 year (except CF offered up to 8 weeks)
Follow-up DE screen for women with type 1 or 2 diabetes found to have diabetic retinopathy
Further DE screen for women with type 1 or 2 diabetes
Give screening information as soon as possible
Key
Fetal anomaly (Down syndrome/T21, Edwards syndrome/T18, Patau syndrome/T13, and fetal anomaly ultrasound)
Sickle cell and thalassaemia
Newborn and infant physical examination
Newborn blood spot
Fig. 5.2 UK NHS pregnancy and newborn screening programmes. Antenatal and newborn screening timeline. *To stop mother-to-baby transmission of infection follow
up all infection screens in pregnancy that are positive: carry out paediatric assessment and follow-up of mothers who are found to be HIV-positive or had syphilis treatment in pregnancy; and if mothers are found to be susceptible to rubella then offer the mother MMR vaccination postnatally and refer to GP for second dose. (GA1 = glutaric aciduria type 1; HCU = homocystinuria; IVA = isovaleric acidaemia; MCADD = medium-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deciency; MSUD = maple syrup urine deciency; PKU = phenylketonuria) Based on Version 8.4, January 2019. Gateway Ref: 20144696 . www.gov.uk/phe/screening.
Newborn hearing
Infectious diseases in pregnancy
Diabetic eye
Epidem iolog y  93
5.5 Calculation of risk using descriptive epidemiology
Prevalence
The ratio of the number of people with a longer-term disease or condition at a
specied time, to the number of people in the population who are at risk
Incidence
The number of events (new cases or episodes) occurring in the population at
risk during a dened period of time
Attributable risk
The difference between the risk (or incidence) of disease in exposed and non-
exposed populations
Attributable fraction
The ratio of the attributable risk to the incidence
Relative risk
The ratio of the risk (or incidence) in the exposed population to the risk (or
incidence) in the non-exposed population
5.6 Epidemiological study designs
Design Description Example
Clinical trial Enrols a sample from
a population and compares outcomes after randomly allocating patients to an
The Medical Research Council (MRC) streptomycin trial – demonstrated effectiveness of streptomycin in tuberculosis
intervention
Cohort Enrols a sample from
a population and compares outcomes
The Framingham Study – identied risk factors for cardiovascular disease
according to exposures
Case–control Enrols cases with an
outcome of interest and controls without that outcome, and compares exposures between the
Doll and Hill’s study on smoking and carcinoma of the lung (BMJ 1950, 2) demonstrated that smoking caused lung cancer
groups
Cross-sectional Enrols a cross-section
(sample) of people from the population of interest. Obtains data on exposures and outcomes
World Health Organization Demographic and Health Survey. Captures risk factor data in a uniform way across many countries
Enrolled 107 patients
with tuberculosis
Random allocation
Streptomycin
55 patients
Follow-up and count deaths
Events 4 Risk 7.3% Odds 0.068
Effect measures
Risk ratio (relative risk, RR)
Absolute risk reduction (ARR)
Relative risk reduction (RRR)
Number needed to treat to prevent
one death (NNT= 1/ARR)
Bed rest
52 patients
Events 15 Risk 28.8% Odds 0.224
Odds ratio (OR)
0.25
0.30
21.6%
74.8%
4.6
Fig. 5.3 An example of a clinical trial: streptomycin versus bed rest in
tuberculosis. Both prevalences and risks are, in fact, proportions and are therefore frequently expressed as odds. The reasons for doing so are beyond the scope of this text.
Population
Random allocation of alleles
Genotype group A
LDL-C lower LDL-C unchanged
Genotype group B
5
disease risk (see Fig. 5.4 for an example). The genetic variant (or mul­tiple variants or genetic risk score) is used as an instrumental variable under certain assumptions. MR investigates the effect of differences in the risk factor level through the life course which have been deter­mined by the genetic variants. This approach uses observational data to test a proposed causal relationship and to estimate the size of effect. Guidelines such as STROBE-MR have been published for the proper conduct of these studies and analytic software packages are now avail­able which contain a range of methods and tools. The selection of the most appropriate method depends on the research question and the data structure.
The MR approach requires very large sample sizes to have sufcient power and very large databases of genetic and health data such as UK Biobank are often used. MR can be conducted using either individual level data or summary data from genome-wide association studies (GWAS); and data from one study (one sample) or two studies with the variant–risk factor association measure from one and the risk factor– outcome association from the other (two sample).
CV event rate lower CV event rate unchanged
Fig. 5.4 Mendelian randomisation. An example showing comparison of a
conventional trial with a Mendelian randomisation study. (CV = cardiovascular; LDL-C = low-density lipoprotein cholesterol) Adapted with permission from Bennett DA, Holmes MV. Heart 2017; 103:1400–1407.
Correct interpretation of MR results is challenging and multiple ana­lytic methods are often employed. This includes methods to detect and adjust for pleiotropy (having more than one effect) which is a common problem in data interpretation. The strength of the conclusions depends on the degree to which instrumental variable assumptions are met and the level of consistency of ndings across different methods. MR has proven useful in both identifying new causal relationships or conrming trial results but also in redirecting research interest away from relation­ships that have been shown not to be causal. MR can be considered
94  P OPU L ATI O N H EALTH AN D EP I DE M IOL O GY
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
INTERNATIONAL FORM OF MEDICAL CERTIFICATE OF CAUSE OF DEATH
Cause of death
I
Disease or condition directly leading to death*
Antecedent causes
Morbid conditions, if any, giving rise to the above cause, stating the underlying condition last
II
Other significant conditions contributing to the death, but not related to the disease or condition causing it
*This does not mean the mode of dying, e.g. heart failure, respiratory failure.
It means the disease, injury, or complication that caused death.
(a)
due to (or as a consequence of)
(b)
due to (or as a consequence of)
(c)
due to (or as a consequence of)
(d)
Approximate
interval between
onset and death
I21.9
E78.0
J47
Fig. 5.5 Completed death certicate. International Classication of Diseases 10 (ICD-10) codes are appended in red. Based on World Health Organization, ICD-10, vol. 2.
Geneva: WHO; 1990. Form retrieved from https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:International_form_of_medical_certicate_of_cause_of_death.png.
to provide further evidence for or against a causal relationship but care should be taken in interpretation of the size of the expected impact from an intervention.
Health data/informatics
As patients pass through health and social care systems, data are recorded concerning their family background, lifestyle and disease states, which is of potential interest to health-care organisations seek­ing to deliver services, policy-makers concerned with improving health, scientic researchers seeking to understand health, and also to phar­maceutical and other commercial organisations seeking to identify markets.
There is a long tradition of maintaining health information systems. In most countries, the registration of births and deaths is required by law, and in the majority, the cause of death is also recorded (Fig. 5.5). There are numerous challenges in ensuring such data are useful, espe­cially for making comparisons across time and place. First, a system of standard terminologies is needed, such as the World Health Organization International Classication of diseases, which provides a list of diagnos­tic codes attempting to cover every diagnostic entity. Secondly, these terms must be understood to refer to the same, or at least similar dis­eases in different places. Thirdly, access to diagnostic skill and facilities is required, fourthly standard protocols for assigning clinical diagnoses to ICD-10 codes are needed and fthly, robust quality control processes are needed to maintain some level of data completeness and accuracy.
Many countries employ similar systems for hospitalisations, either to allow recovery of healthcare utilisation costs, or to manage and plan ser­vices. Similar data are, however, rarely collected for community-based healthcare. Nor are detailed data on health-care process generally included in national data systems.
Consequently, there has been considerable interest in using data from information technology systems used to deliver care – such as electronic patient records, drug-dispensing databases, radiological software, and clinical laboratory information systems.
Data from such systems are, of course, much less structured than those obtained from vital registrations. Moreover, the completeness of such data depends greatly on local patterns of healthcare utilisation as well as how clinicians and others use IT systems within different settings. As such, deriving useful unbiased information from such data is a con­siderable challenge.
Much of the discipline of health informatics is concerned with address­ing this challenge. One approach has been to develop comprehensive standard classication systems such as SNOMED-CT ‘a standardised, multilingual vocabulary of terms relating to the care of the individual’ which has been designed for electronic health-care records. An alterna­tive has been to use statistical methods such as natural language pro­cessing to automatically derive information from free text (such as culling diagnoses from radiological reports), or to employ ‘machine learning’, in which software algorithms are applied to data in order to derive useful insights. Such approaches are suited to large, messy data where the costs of systematisation would be prohibitive. It is likely that such inno­vations will over the coming years provide useful information to com­plement that obtained from more traditional health information systems.