Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_2603_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
63 Мб
Скачать
258
https://t.me/medicina_free
Chapter 6 · Rheumatology
k Signs on US
1. Ear pinna chondritis or perichondritis can be detected by ear pinna US.The ear pinna is a highly specialized structure that serves to collect sound and conduct it to the middle ear. On sonograms, it is possible to distin­guish two different zones of the ear pinna: an upper region and a lower region. The anatomic difference is mainly the presence or absence of cartilage inside the layers. The upper region corresponds to the higher two thirds of the ear pinna and consists of three layers: anterior and posterior, each depicted as echoic thin skin layers, and a middle layer containing cartilage, which is represented as a completely hypoechoic regu-
6
lar thin band that follows the different concavities and convexities of the ear pinna (. Fig. 6.12.4 ). The lower
structure and consists of only skin because of the absence of cartilage in this area. The normal mean thickness of the hypoechoic cartilage at the antihelix boarder is 0.7–0.9mm, and the normal mean thickness of the lobule is 6–8 mm. Ear pinna chondritis is detected as thickened, echogenic, and beaded-shaped cartilage. A dissecting fluid collection may be seen, dividing the normally uniform 1-layer hypoechoic car­tilage into a 2-layer structure.
2. On musculoskeletal ultrasound, the cartilage surface of the metacarpophalangeal joint, seen as completely hypoechoic circular layer over the metacarpal heads, can show increased signal on power Doppler sonogra­phy, re ecting the hyperemia of chondritis
. Fig. 6.12.5 ) .
(
region is depicted by the ear lobule, which is a 1-layer
. Fig. 6.12.4 Ear helix ultrasound image of a patient with relapsing polychondritis that demonstrates the sonographic anatomy of the ear helix
with the cartilage layer seen as a hypoechoic layer ( arrowhead )
6.12 · Relapsing Polychondritis
https://t.me/medicina_free
259
6
. Fig. 6.12.5 Two musculoskeletal ultrasound images of the metacarpal bones of a patient with relapsing polychondritis demonstrating
increase signal of the power Doppler signal of the cartilage over the metacarpal head ( arrowhead ), which denotes infl ammation (chondritis)
260
https://t.me/medicina_free
Chapter 6 · Rheumatology
Signs on CT and MRI
1. The same radiographic features of cartilage calcifi cation can be seen on CT images detected in the ear pinnae, nose, and trachea.
2. On MRI, tracheal stenosis with circumferential increased signal intensity, and contrast enhancement is detected when tracheal chondritis is present.
3. Brain MRI, especially angiographic time-to-fl ight (TOF) images, can show stenotic and beading of the circle of Willis if vasculitis is present (
ab
. Fig. 6.12.6 ) .
6
. Fig. 6.12.6 Axial FLAIR-T2W MR-image ( a ) and TOF MR-image ( b ) of a patient with relapsing polychondritis; the patient presented with
severe headache for MR investigation. Although the FLAIR-T2W image shows no brain injury, the TOF image shows stenosis of the right vertebral artery ( arrowhead )
Selected References
Ananthakrishna R, etal. Relapsing polychondritis-case series
from south India. Clin Rheumatol. 2009;28 Suppl 1:S7–
10.
Caceres M, etal. Transverse aortic arch replacement associ-
ated with MAGIC Syndrome: case report and literature review. Ann Vasc Surg. 2006;20:395–8.
Coppola M, etal. Relapsing polychondritis: an unusual cause of
painful auricular swelling. Ann Emerg Med. 1992;21:81–5.
Irani SR, etal. Relapsing “encephalo” polychondritis. Pract
Neurol. 2006;6:372–5.
Kumakiri K, etal. A case of relapsing polychondritis preceded
by inner ear involvement. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2005;32:71–6.
Oddone M, etal. Relapsing polychondritis in childhood: a
rare observation studied by CT and MRI.Pediatr Radiol. 1992;22:537–8.
Wortsman X, etal. Sonography of the Ear Pinna. Ultrasound
Med. 2008;27:761–70.
Fornadly JA, etal.  e role of MRI when relapsing polychon-
dritis is suspected but not proven. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinology. 1995;31:101–7.
6.13 R e fl ex Sympathetic Dystrophy
Gergely P. Relapsing polychondritis. Best Pract Res Clin
Rheumatol. 2004;18(5):723–38.
Giordano M, etal. Relapsing polychondritis with aortic arch
aneurysm and aortic arch syndrome. Rheumatol Int. 1984;4:191–3.
Hidalgo-Tenorio C, et al. Magic syndrome and true aortic
aneurysm. Clin Rheumatol. 2008;27:115–7.
 e complex regional pain syndromes (CRPS I and CRPS II), also known as re ex sympathetic dystrophy (CRPS I) and cau- salgia (CRPS II) , are diseases characterized by discrete sen­sory, motor, and autonomic  ndings. Nerve supply to any limb can be divided into three main neuronal supplies: sen­sory, motor, and autonomic.
6.13 · Refl ex Sympathetic Dystrophy
https://t.me/medicina_free
261
6
Injury to the sensory supply results in paresthesia and numbness, with complete loss of sensation in extreme irre­versible sensory neuronal damage. Injury to the motor neu­ronal supply results in paraparesis or paralysis depending on the degree of neuronal loss. In contrast to both sensory and motor neuronal injury, autonomic injury results in CRPS I.CRPS I is also called Sudeck ’ s atrophy and hand - shoulder syndrome in some medical literatures.
CRPS II, or causalgia, is de ned as a limb pain that is always preceded by a partial injury to a peripheral nerve or one of its major branches.  is syndrome is not always pro­gressive and can persist for years without any clinical changes.
Patients with CRPS I di use pain in a limb that a ects the autonomic and maybe the motor innervation of that limb ( commonly a ecting the upper limbs compared to the lower limbs ).
CRPS I has a female predominance, with a normal age distribution with a peak of 50 years of age.  e disease can be suspected and di erentiated from other causes of neuropathy by the following typical features: A . History of a noxious event preceding the pain : typically, the
pain is preceded by a noxious even such as minor trauma,
sprains, bone fractures, surgery ( e.g ., carpal tunnel ,
Dupuytren ’ s contracture ), and other lesions such as shoul-
der trauma, myocardial infarction, or even contralateral
stroke. However, CRPS I is idiopathic in 35 % of cases.
CRPS I can be transiently produced in healthy individu-
als by immobilizing a limb for 1 month. B . Exaggerated pain : the pain is typically disproportionate
to the inciting event ( a small trauma not mentioned ,
followed later by severe limb pain ) and is felt deep within
the limb. Pain can be felt even due to water or air
exposure, known in the neurological literature as
allodynia , which is de ned as pain that arises due to
non-painful stimuli.
 e pain is typically described as burning, throbbing, pressing, shooting, or aching. In nearly all cases, the con­tinuous pain is felt deeply inside the distal part of the a ected extremity. It always shows a di use distribution that is unrelated to territories of individual nerves.
C . Pain that does not follow a speci c dermatom :  e signs
and symptoms of CRPS I are not con ned to the innerva­tion zone of an individual nerve and show a distally gen­eralized distribution (95 % of cases).
D . Complain that shows sensory , motor , and autonomic a ec-
tion : CRPS I pain has a triad of sensory, motor, and auto­nomic symptoms that are present in 90 % of cases of CRPS I; however, there appears to be no  xed combina­tions.
E . Limb swelling : typically, the a ected limb shows swelling
due to loss of the autonomic control of the microvasculature of that limb causing localized vascular shunting at the site of trauma.
F. Mirror image syndrome : in CRPS I, the pain extend along
the limb or migrates to other body parts in nearly 70 % of patients.  e pain becomes bilateral, producing a “mirror image” of pain in up to 50 % of cases. In rare cases, the pain can even encompass the entire body. Mirror- image pain arises from the healthy body region contralateral to the actual site of trauma or in ammation. Mirror-image pain is generally characterized as mechanical allodynia.
CRPS I clinically can be divided into three stages: acute phase, which is marked by pain, edema, warm skin, and increased sweating; dystrophic phase, which is marked by cold, dry skin, and trophic changes; and atrophic phase, which is marked by atrophied skeletal muscles and bones, joint contractures, progressive loss of function, and persis­tent pain.
Signs on Plain Radiographs
Plain radiographs often show a diff use and spotty distal distribution of demineralization (osteopenia) of small bones with periarticular dominance at the longer bones (
. Fig. 6.13.1 ). These radiologic fi ndings ( which are called
Sudecks atrophy ) are generally not evident until the
syndrome has been established for several months. The pathophysiological explanation for the bone demineralization is due to the vascular shunting that causes autonomic bone marrow edema and infl ammation, which in the end will boost the osteoclastic activity over the osteoblastic one. It should be remembered that the radiographic manifestations of CRPS I means that the patient has been suff ering for years without proper therapy.
262
https://t.me/medicina_free
Chapter 6 · Rheumatology
6
. Fig. 6.13.1 Plain radiograph of both hands of a patient with CRPS I that shows right-sided, bone osteopenia compared to the left hand
that aff ects the metacarpal heads ( arrow ) and the carpal bones ( arrowhead ), with old fracture of the distal radius
Signs on Doppler Sonography
1. In the acute phase, arterial Doppler of the arteries in the aff ected limb above the area of pain (or injury) shows mono- to biphasic waveform spectrum, compatible with the arterial shunting which occurs due to autonomic disturbance ( artery on the contralateral arm or leg shows normal triphasic waveform spectrum. After treatment, the
. Fig. 6.13.2 ). In comparison, the same
mono- to biphasic waveform spectrum can return to normal (triphasic).
2. On musculoskeletal US, the aff ected nerve will show a hypo echoic texture ( show a hyper echoic texture due to the fatty nature of the myelin sheath. The hypoechoic texture seen in neuropathies is suggested by the medical literature to be seen due to lipid peroxidation.
. Fig. 6.13.3 ); a normal nerve will
6.13 · Refl ex Sympathetic Dystrophy
https://t.me/medicina_free
263
. Fig. 6.13.2 Doppler sonographic images of a 53-year-old female patient presented with 3 months history of left-sided pain and
allodynia due to CRPS I. Doppler sonography of the deep palmar arch revealed a classical sign of mild “arteriovenous shunting” in Doppler sonography, detected as a mixture wave pattern that merges the arterial and venous waves together ( upper image ). In comparison, the right-sided Doppler wave sonography ( lower image ) shows biphasic Doppler waveform, not the normal peripheral, arterial triphasic pattern, which denotes a mild arterial shunting present, but not as severe as the left hand (mirror syndrome)
6
. Fig. 6.13.3 Nerve ultrasound image of a 47-year-old female patient presented with CRPS I for 1-month duration. The median nerve
ultrasound showed hypoechoic texture ( arrow ), while her husband’s median nerve shows normal iso- to hyperechoic texture ( arrowhead )
Signs on MRI
The distal bones of the limb aff ected by CRPS I can show nonspecifi c, patchy bone marrow edema; any bone can be aff ected. In the medical literature, CRPS I commonly aff ects the hip joint in pregnant women, a condition known as hip bone marrow edema syndrome , a variant of CRPS I.
264
https://t.me/medicina_free
Chapter 6 · Rheumatology
. Fig. 6.14.1 ). Due to the absence of speci c laboratory
Selected References
Bennett DS, etal. Complex regional pain syndromes (re ex
sympathetic dystrophy and causalgia) and spinal cord stimulation. American Academy of Pain Medicine.
( serological tests for this condition, radiological investiga­tions are important to assist in investigating the clinical diagnostic criteria.
2006;7:S64–96.
Unusual Presentations of Polymyalgia Rheumatica
Crozier F, etal. Magnetic resonance imaging in re ex sympa-
thetic dystrophy syndrome of the foot. Joint Bone Spine. 2003;70:503–8.
Oyen WJG, etal. Re ex sympathetic dystrophy of the hand:
an excessive in ammatory response? Pain. 1993;55:151–7.
Pekindil G, etal. Doppler sonographic assessment of post-
traumatic re ex sympathetic dystrophy. J Ultrasound
6
Med. 2003;22:395–402.
z
1 . Peripheral joint synovitis : a ecting typically the shoulder
and the hip joints, symmetrically or asymmetrically.
2 . Sternoclavicular synovitis : the sternoclavicular joint is not
usually a ected in in ammatory diseases, but it is sometimes involved in polymyalgia rheumatica.
3 . Distal swelling with pitting edema : another unusual
syndrome is known as RS3PE ( remitting seronegative symmetrical synovitis with pitting edema ).
4 . Aortic dissection : due to giant cell aortitis.
6.14 Polymyalgia Rheumatica
Polymyalgia rheumatica (PR) is an in ammatory condition with unknown origin characterized by morning sti ness and
Polymyalgia rheumatica
aching sensation in the cervical region, shoulder, and pelvic girdles. It has been considered in the past as a variant mani­festation of giant cell arteritis, until it has been rede ned by Bird etal. (1979) as a separate rheumatic entity. Although PMR is considered a disease of unknown origin, it has been found to have a close concurrence with some infections like Mycoplasma pneumonia , Chlamydia pneumonia , and parvo- virus B19.
 e diagnostic criteria of PR include ( according to Healey ;
1984 ): (a) Bilateral pain persisting for at least one month and
involving one of the following areas: neck, shoulders,
and pelvic girdles. (b) Morning sti ness lasting more than one hour. (c) Rapid response to low-dose steroid (10–15mg in the
morning). (d) Absence of other diseases explains the current
symptoms. (e) Age more than 50 years. (f) Erythrocytes sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein
serum levels are raised. (g) Ultrasonographic features of bursitis and/or synovitis in
the shoulder and/or hip joints.
Patients with PR present with bilateral discomfort in the upper limbs that interfere with the daily activities.  e pain in the shoulder and pelvic girdles o en radiates to the elbows and the knees. Symmetric peripheral arthritis a ect­ing the knees and wrists, carpal tunnel syndrome, and pit­ting edema of the dorsum of the hands may be seen
. Fig. 6.14.1 An illustration that demonstrates the body’s
geographic distribution of polymyalgia rheumatica arthropathy
6.14 · Polymyalgia Rheumatica
https://t.me/medicina_free
265
Signs on US
Shoulder US shows hip eff usion (68 %), shoulder subacromial bursa fl uid collection (96 %), and biceps tendon tenosynovitis with peritendinous fl uid collection (Figs.
6.14.2 and 6.14.3 ), all attributed to bursitis and/or synovitis of these joints
6
a
. Fig. 6.14.2 Musculoskeletal sonographic images of the right shoulder of a patient with polymyalgia rheumatic showing fl uid
collection around the long head of biceps tendon ( arrowhead in a ), associated with hyperemia seen as increased power Doppler signal ( arrow in b ); the fi ndings refl ects tenosynovitis
b
Signs on MRI
1. Shoulder MRI may show subdeltoid and subacromial bursitis, and biceps tendon tenosynovitis. Tenosynovitis is seen as an enlarged tendon with free fl uid surrounding it due to infl ammation and edema.
2. Subacromial bursitis is seen as free fl uid located above the supraspinatus tendon with intact supraspinatus tendon (no signs of tears or tendinosis).
3. Hands and wrists tenosynovitis may be seen as abnormal tendon signal intensity on T2W images with surrounding free fl uid.
4. A patient with chest pain should be investigated for aortic dissection.
. Fig. 6.14.3 Musculoskeletal, panoramic sonographic
images of the same patient in Fig. 6.14.2 showing fl uid collection around the iliopsoas tendon at the right hip ( arrowhead ), refl ecting iliopsoas bursitis
266
https://t.me/medicina_free
Chapter 6 · Rheumatology
Selected References
Mandell B. Polymyalgia rheumatic: clinical presentation is
key diagnosis and treatment. Cleve Clin J Med. 2004;71(6):489–95.
Salvarani C, et al. Polymyalgia rheumatica and giant-cell
arteritis. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:261–71.
Salvarani C, etal. Polymyalgia rheumatica. Best Pract Res
Clin Rheumatol. 2004;18(5):705–22.
Soriano A, etal. Polymyalgia rheumatica in 2011. Best Pract
Res Clin Rheumatol. 2012;26(1):91–104.
6
6.15 Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic, in amma­tory, autoimmune systemic disorder of unknown origin characterized by the formation of autoantibodies that attack multiple organs. SLE has a female predominance, with peri­ods of  ares and remissions. SLE antibodies can be catego­rized into categories: 1 . Antibodies against nuclei ( antinuclear antibodies ): anti-
DNA histone, anti-double-stranded DNA (dsDNA), and anti-single-stranded DNA antibodies
2 . Antibodies against cytoplasmic component s:
mitochondrial and microsomal antibodies
3 . Organ-speci c antibodies : e.g., antithyroid antibodies 4 . Others : rheumatoid factor (50 % of cases), cryoglobulins,
and antiphospholipid antibodies
3 . Renal SLE : these are ranges from mild asymptomatic
proteinuria to rapidly progressing glomerulonephritis associated with end-stage renal disease.  e main injury of the kidneys in SLE is related to glomerular lesions with or without injury to the tubules and interstitium. Rarely, isolated tubulointerstitial changes can be encountered in the presence of minimal glomerular abnormalities in SLE or so-called predominant tubulointerstitial lupus nephritis.
4 . Neuropsychiatric manifestations of SLE : these
manifestations include headaches, dementia, seizures (focal or di use), and psychoses.
5 . Pulmonary SLE : this includes unilateral or bilateral pleural
e usions, reticular interstitial lung disease, pleural thickening, alveolar lung disease, and shrinking lung syndrome. Shrinking lung syndrome (SLS) is a rare complication of SLE with unknown origin characterized by unexplained progressive dyspnea, pleuritic chest pain, fever, dry cough, small lung volumes, elevation of the diaphragm, and restrictive physiology on pulmonary function tests. It is suggested that SLS is caused by myositis of the diaphragm, phrenic nerve paresis, restrictive rib cage abnormality of unknown pathology, or pleural adhesions.
6 . Other systemic manifestations of SLE : fever and anemia.
 ere is increased frequency of midtrimester abortions (15 %), prematurity (20 %), and stillbirth (10 %) in pregnant women with SLE  ares.
7 . Skeletal rheumatological manifestations of SLE include:
SLE pathology is characterized by widespread of vasculi-
tis, a ecting capillaries, arterioles, and venules. SLE can be localized to the skin without systemic manifestations ( chronic cutaneous lupus ), self-limiting due to certain medications ( drug - induced lupus ), and a ecting neonates due to maternal anti-Rho antibodies crossing the placenta ( neonatal lupus ). SLE can be triggered by endogenous factors (e.g., sex hor­mones) or exogenous factors (e.g., sunlight exposure). Drugs that induce lupus-like reaction include alpha interferon and hydralazine.
Serological characteristics of SLE include high serum lev­els of antinuclear antibody (ANA), anti-double-strand DNA (anti-dsDNA), rheumatoid factor, and antiphospholipid antibodies. Patients with SLE have ANA-positive results in 95 % of cases. However, positive ANA results are not speci c to SLE and can be seen in normal individuals > 65 years of age (15 %) at low titers, patients with Sjögren’s syndrome, patients with scleroderma, and patients with autoimmune thyroid disease.
Manifestations of SLE include ( diagnosis is con rmed by
ful lling at least four systemic manifestations with positive serological tests ):
1 . Cutaneous SLE : this includes malar rash, photosensitivity,
and discoid lupus
2 . Cardiopulmonary SLE : this is seen mostly in the form of
pleuritis, pericarditis, bilateral pleural e usion, and uncommonly noninfective (Libman–Sacks) endocarditis.
I . Lupus arthritis : arthritis a ects 69–95 % of SLE
patients in the form of symmetric, nonerosive polyarthritis that preferentially involves the small joints over the large joints, although any joint may be a ected.  e most common joints a ected are the hand joints including the metacarpal phalangeal (MCP), proximal interphalangeal (PIP), and distal interphalangeal (DIP) as well as the knees (Fig. 6.15.1 ). Shoulders, ankles, and elbows are less commonly a ected but can be involved. Swelling of the joints or synovial proliferation can be present, although the swelling is o en not as prominent as it is with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Other signs include morning sti ness, arthralgia, and joint erythema.
II. Sacroiliitis : although sacroiliitis is typically thought of
as a manifestation of the seronegative spondyloarthropathies, it has been reported in SLE in up to 50 % of cases.
III. Atlantoaxial subluxation : it is seen in 8.5 % of SLE
patients, especially patients with Jaccoud’s arthropathy.
IV. Deforming arthropathy ( Jaccouds arthritis ): this is an
uncommon form of deforming arthritis characterized by ligament laxity, joints deformity, which may be associated with joints erosions ( 3–13 % of SLE patients and is associated with high serum titers of anti-RNP antibodies. Jaccoud’s
. Fig. 6.15.2 ). It a ects
6.15 · Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
https://t.me/medicina_free
267
6
SLE arthritis
Jaccoud’s arthropathy
. Fig. 6.15.1 An illustration that demonstrates the body’s
geographic distribution of SLE arthropathy
arthropathy is not speci c for SLE and can be seen on other conditions including scleroderma and dermatomyositis.
V. Erosive arthritis ( rhupus ): SLE arthritis is typically
nonerosive. However, erosive SLE arthritis can be seen in cases of SLE/RA overlap, also known as (rhupus). Rhupus has an incidence of 0.01–2 % of SLE patients and has been associated with high serum titers of anti-CCP and anti-RA33 antibodies in some studies.
VI. Synovitis and tenosynovitis : they are seen in up to 44 %
of SLE patients typically symmetrical in distribution. Tendon rupture is a rare complication of SLE. e tendons that are more commonly involved include the Achilles, patellar, infrapatellar tendons, and tendons in the hand.
VII. Avascular necrosis and bone infarction : it is commonly
seen in SLE patients who show high serum titers of antiphospholipid antibodies, especially in the femoral head.
VIII. Others : periarticular osteoporosis, acral sclerosis,
so -tissue calci cation (calcinosis), and cystic bone lesions.
. Fig. 6.15.2 An illustration that demonstrates the body’s
geographic distribution of Jaccoud’s arthropathy
D i ff erential Diagnoses and Related Diseases
k Brown’s Syndrome
Brown’s syndrome is a disease characterized by intermittent diplopia due to congenital or acquired motility impairment of the superior oblique muscle.  e disease is believed to be secondary to restriction of the superior oblique muscle in the trochlea/tendon complex, causing tethering of the mus­cle when the eye is adducted. Acquired Brown syndrome can be caused by paranasal sinuses infections, trauma, orbital in ammation, rheumatoid arthritis stenosing syno­vitis, SLE, scleroderma, and rarely psoriasis. Acquired Brown syndrome usually responds to corticosteroids ther­apy, especially when in ammation or systemic connective tissue disorders are the cause. Patients are presenting with intermittent diplopia when gazing upward, and the disease is characterized by inability to actively or passively elevate the a ected eye in full adduction. Other features include widened palpebral  ssure on adduction and divergence on midline eye elevation.