Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_629_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
64 Мб
Скачать
463
PLATE
217
INDICATIONS All femoral hernias should be repaired unless contraindi-
cated by the patient’s condition.
PREOPERATIVE PREPARATION  e preoperative preparation is directed
by the patient’s general condition. When the contents of the hernia sac are strangulated, the  uid and electrolyte balance is restored by Ringer’s lac­tate solution administered intravenously. Antibiotics are instituted if the examination indicates the possibility of nonviability of the bowel and con­sequent necessity for resection of intestine. Su cient time is taken to fully resuscitate the patient. Constant gastric suction is instituted. A slowing of the pulse and a good output of urine are signs favorable to early surgical intervention. Uncomplicated femoral hernias may be repaired as ambula­tory surgical procedures.
ANESTHESIA (See Plate .)
POSITION  e patient is placed in a supine position with the knees slightly
 exed to lessen the tension in the groin.  e entire table is tilted slightly with the patient’s head down.
OPERATIVE PREPARATION  e skin is prepared in the routine manner.
A sterile transparent plastic drape may be used to cover the operative area.
INCISION AND EXPOSURE  e surgeon should have in mind the rela-
tionship of the hernia sac to the deep femoral vessels and Poupart’s liga­ment (figure 1).  e usual incision for inguinal hernia is made just above Poupart’s ligament in the line of skin cleavage (figure 2).  e incision above Poupart’s ligament is preferred because it gives the best exposure of the neck of the sac and provides better exposure if bowel resection and anastomosis are necessary.  e incision is made and carried down to the external oblique fascia. A er the fascia has been dissected free of the sub­cutaneous fat, retractors are inserted in the wound.  e external oblique fascia is divided in the direction of its  bers, as in the incision for ingui­nal hernia (Plate ).  e round ligament or spermatic cord is retracted upward along with the margin of the conjoined tendon (figure 3).  e peritoneum, covered by transversalis fascia, now bulges in the wound.  e neck of the hernia sac is freed from the surrounding tissues.
R  F H
with forceps, while the operator applies counterpressure below Poupart’s ligament through the hernial mass (figure 4). If the sac cannot be reduced from beneath Poupart’s ligament by this maneuver, it becomes necessary to dissect the subcutaneous tissue from the lower leaf of the external oblique until the hernial sac is exposed as it appears in the femoral canal beneath Poupart’s ligament (figure 5). Following this procedure, it is frequently possible to withdraw the hernial sac from the femoral canal, converting the femoral hernia to a diverticular type of direct hernia (figure 6).
If the contents of the hernial sac appear to be reduced so that it can be opened without possible injury to incarcerated bowel, the sac is opened (figure 7). A purse-string suture, which should include transversalis fas­cia as well as peritoneum, is placed at the junction of the sac and the peri­toneal cavity so that when it is tied, no residual peritoneal pouch remains (figures 8 and 9). Great care is taken that the suture closing the neck of the sac does not include intestine or omentum.
CLOSURE  ere are several methods of preventing recurrence of the her-
nia.  e transversalis fascia and the aponeurotic margin of the transverse abdominal muscle may be approximated from the spine of the pubis upward along Cooper’s ligament (figure 10), as in the repair of a direct inguinal hernia by the McVay technique (Plate ). It is essential to have adequate exposure of the iliac vessels such that they are not injured when these inter­rupted sutures (figures 11 and 12) are placed. Several sutures are taken in Cooper’s ligament and the lacunar ligament on the inferior edge of Poupart’s ligament in order to close the femoral canal (figure 11).  e iliac vessels should not be constricted as the transition suture is placed near the medial wall of the femoral vein.  e repair then proceeds laterally in the McVay manner, with interrupted sutures securing the conjoint tendon (internal oblique muscle) to the shelving edge of the inguinal ligament (figure 12).  e round ligament in the female or the cord in the male is returned to nor­mal position or transplanted as in other types of hernia repair.  e external oblique is closed without constriction about the cord or round ligament, followed by the usual approximation of the subcutaneous tissue and skin. A continuous subcutaneous absorbable suture is used to approximate the skin. Adhesive strips and a dry sterile dressing are then applied.
DETAILS OF PROCEDURE  e operator must now choose one of two pro-
cedures. If the sac can be pulled upward through the femoral canal to the surface, it may be unnecessary to open the abdominal cavity until the sac itself is opened.  is is facilitated by retracting the neck of the sac upward
POSTOPERATIVE CARE It is wise to keep the thigh slightly  exed during
the immediate postoperative period.  e patient is encouraged to ambulate as soon as possible. Heavy manual labor, especially such as which greatly increases intra-abdominal tension, should be avoided for about  month.
464
1
Poupart’s ligament
Deep epigastric vessels
Iliohypogastric nerve
2
Incision
3
Round ligament
Ilioinguinal nerve
Ilioinguinal nerve
Femoral vein
Greater saphenous vein
4
Femoral canal
7
Hernia sac
Peritoneum
Exploring sac
Round ligament
Spine of pubis
Gimbernat’s (lacunar) ligament
5
Neck of hernial sac
Falciform ligament
8
Femoral vein
Hernia sac
Neck of sac
Round ligament
Deep epigastric vessels
Lacunar (Gimbernat’s) ligament
Iliac vessels
Peritoneum and transversalis fascia
6
9
Transversalis fascia
Poupart’s ligament
Sac
Poupart’s ligament
Femoral canal
10
Aponeurosis of transversus abdominis muscle
Cooper’s ligament
Femoral canal
11
Femoral canal
Aponeurosis of transversus abdominis muscle
Poupart’s ligament
Lacunar ligament
Femoral canal
Lacunar ligament
12
Conjoined tendon
Cooper’s ligament
Spine of pubis
Round ligament
465
PLATE
218
INDICATIONS All femoral hernias should be repaired unless contraindi-
cated by the physical or medical condition of the patient. Incarceration with possible strangulation is a concern, as the femoral opening is small and its boundaries are unyielding. Ultrasound imaging studies may be useful when the diagnosis is di cult.
PREOPERATIVE PREPARATION  e preoperative preparation is deter-
mined by the general condition of the patient. Uncomplicated femoral hernias may be repaired in an ambulatory surgery setting. Incarcerated femoral hernias without gastrointestinal signs or symptoms should be repaired expeditiously, while symptomatic hernias are treated urgently. Strangulation requires hospitalization and resuscitation of the patient with nasogastric tube decompression, intravenous rehydration, and parenteral antibiotics. Any general medical conditions are evaluated and su cient time is allowed for volume and electrolyte stabilization. Improved vital signs and a good urine output indicate readiness for surgery.
ANESTHESIA Deep sedation with in ltration of a local anesthetic as a
 eld block may be used in elective cases, as can spinal or epidural anes­thetic techniques. Patients with strangulation and obstruction should have general anesthesia with an endotracheal tube and cu to lessen the threat of tracheal aspiration.
POSITION  e patient is placed in a supine position with the knees slightly
 exed by a pillow so as to lessen the tension in the groin.
OPERATIVE PREPARATION  e skin is shaved and prepared in the rou-
tine manner. Parenteral antibiotics appropriate for prophylaxis against the usual skin bacteria are given immediately prior to the start of the procedure and in su cient time to reach therapeutic tissue levels.
INCISION AND EXPOSURE It is important that the surgeon understand
the regional anatomy of the femoral space.  is opening is approximately  to ½ cm in diameter and lies directly lateral to the pubic tubercle but infe­rior to the inguinal ligament (figure 1).  e fascia overlying the pectineus muscle forms the posterior wall, whereas the lateral aspect is bounded by the slightly compressible femoral vein as it emerges under the inguinal ligament. Clinically, the femoral herniation presents as a mass that may be confused with super cial inguinal lymphadenopathy. In thin patients, the line of the inguinal ligament from the anterior superior spine to the pubic tubercle can be projected and the femoral herniation will clearly present below this, being immediately lateral to the pubic tubercle and medial to the pulsation of the femoral vessels. If the surgeon is certain of this diagnosis, which may be aided by the use of ultrasonography, then the lower limited oblique incision directly over the mass may be made (figure 2, b). If the diagnosis is in doubt, the patient is obese, or the possibility of strangulation exists, then the upper incision (figure 2, a) is made so as to provide maximum exposure and  exibility.  is incision is slightly lower than that made for the usual inguinal hernia. It is above and parallel in general to the inguinal ligament
R  F H  M
with a more transverse medial extension.  e incision is made and carried down to the external oblique fascia.  e fascia over the canal is cleaned so as to expose the external ring.  e external oblique fascia is divided in the direction of its  bers in the manner used for exposure in inguinal hernias. A pair of hemostats are placed on the superior and inferior leaves of the exter­nal oblique, which is then cleaned by blunt dissection down to the internal oblique muscle superiorly and the shelving edge of the inguinal ligament inferiorly.  e round ligament or spermatic cord with attached ilioinguinal nerve is dissected free and retracted superiorly either with a rubber Penrose drain or a Richardson retractor (figure 3).  e transversalis fascia consti­tuting the  oor of the canal is explored to rule out any direct herniation, and therea er the region of the internal ring is explored to rule out the presence of an indirect herniation.
DETAILS OF PROCEDURE  e inferior leaf of the external oblique is
retracted superiorly and the femoral herniation becomes apparent as it emerges just under the inguinal ligament lateral to the pubic tubercle.  is same exposure is obtained if the lower incision is made directly over the hernia.  e sac is grasped and, using a combination of sharp and blunt dis­section, it is freed from the surrounding fat of the upper thigh (figure 4). As the dissection proceeds, the herniation is found to occur through a nar­row opening that is approximately the size of the surgeon’s   h  nger. Most o en the sac contains preperitoneal fat or omentum, which can be reduced; however, should strangulated gangrenous bowel be encountered, the sur­geon must plan for resection with a synchronous laparotomy.
A er successful reduction in an uncomplicated case, it is not neces­sary to open the sac.  is is usually invaginated back through the fem­oral opening, which now presents as a de ned hole (figure 5). A syn­thetic plug is made according to the method of Lichtenstein by rolling up a piece of polypropylene mesh approximately  by  cm in length.  is spiral winding creates a cylinder of mesh that is grasped with a Babcock clamp (figure 6) and then inserted into the femoral opening such that a few millimeters protrude externally.  ree quadrants of the cylinder are secured with interrupted nonabsorbable sutures of polypropylene or nylon. Each is anchored to the adjacent fascia with the suture extending well into the center of the rolled cylinder so as to prevent an intussuscep­tion of the mesh.  e superior suture attaches to the inguinal ligament, the medial one to the lacunar ligament and fascia investing the pubic tubercle, and the inferior one to the fascia over the pectineus muscle. No suture is placed laterally, as this wall is the femoral vein (figure 7).  e external oblique fascia is reapproximated with either interrupted or running non­absorbable sutures and the routine closure of Scarpa’s fascia and the skin is performed. A small dressing is applied to cover the incision.
POSTOPERATIVE CARE In the uncomplicated case, the patient is quickly
discharged home with written instructions concerning activities, signs of bleeding or infection, or any other unusual reaction. Most are able to resume normal activities within a few days.
466
467
PLATE
219
L A   I R
 is plate shows the key anatomic features of importance that the skilled surgeon must know thoroughly during any type of laparoscopic operation for inguinal and femoral hernia repair.
 e  rst concept is to recognize that the parietal peritoneum covers cer­tain structures forming  ve ligaments that are useful landmarks in identify­ing the hernia spaces when approaching the groin from the intraperitoneal route as in the TAPP repair.  ese ligaments include the median umbili­cal ligament () running from the bladder to the umbilicus, the medial umbilical ligaments (), which are the remnants of the obliterated umbilical arteries, and the lateral umbilical ligaments () formed by the peritoneum covering the inferior epigastric vessels ().  e spatial relationships of these ligaments allow recognition of the various types of hernias. A direct inguinal hernia () occurs in the medial space bounded by the inferior epigastric vessels or lateral umbilical ligament, the iliopubic tract (), the pubic tubercle () (the medial end of the muscular conjoined tendon [internal oblique muscle]). An indirect inguinal hernia presents through the internal ring () above the iliopubic tract and is lateral to the lateral umbilical ligament containing the epigastric vessels () on the posterior surface of the rectus muscle (). A view of the femoral hernia space () can be seen below the iliopubic tract () and medial to the femoral vessels exit­ing through the femoral canal. During the laparoscopic repair, the direct, indirect, and femoral spaces should all be covered with mesh.
 e second important concept concerns the spaces that occur beneath the peritoneal covering ().  e preperitoneal space is the space bounded by the peritoneum posteriorly and the transversalis fascia anteriorly.  e space of Retzius is that space between the pubis and the bladder.  e lateral extent of this space is named Bogro’s space.  e transversalis fascia forms the  oor of the inguinal canal and the iliopectineal arch, iliopubic tract, and crura of the deep inguinal ring.  e iliopectineal arch divides the vascular compartment (iliac vessels) from the neuromuscular compartment (iliop­soas muscle, femoral nerve, and the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve).  e iliopubic tract is an aponeurotic band that begins near the anterior superior iliac spine and inserts on the pubic tubercle () medially. In its medial
extent, it contributes to the formation of Cooper’s ligament (). It forms the inferior margin of the deep musculoaponeurotic layer made up of the transversus abdominis muscle and aponeurosis and the transversalis fascia. Laterally, it extends to the iliacus and psoas fascia. It forms with  bers of the transversalis fascia, the anterior margin of the femoral sheath and the medial border of the femoral ring and canal. Its lower margin is attached to the inguinal ligament.  e iliopubic tract is an important landmark. Dissec­tion or tacking of preperitoneal mesh should not take place inferior to the iliopubic tract except in the limited region of Cooper’s ligament. Dissection or tack placement centrally beneath the iliopubic tract will injure the femo­ral vein, artery, and nerve, whereas placement laterally may damage the lumbar nerve branches.  e superior and inferior crura of the deep ingui­nal ring are formed by the transversalis fascia. Cooper’s ligament is formed by the periosteum of the superior pubic ramus and the iliopubic tract.
 e inferior epigastric vessels give o two branches: the external sper­matic vessel that travels in the spermatic cord and the iliopubic branch.  e latter may form a corona mortis.  is vascular anomaly presents as a branch of either the inferior epigastric or the external iliac that passes over the pubic tubercle en route to the obturator system. Either the arterial or the venous system may be involved in this “crown of death,” which may cause signi cant hemorrhage during dissection and exposure of Cooper’s ligament or mesh  xation with penetrating tacks.
Finally, there are two zones that must be avoided during preperitoneal dissection and  xation of mesh.  e  rst is the lateral zone that is bounded on the medial side by the spermatic cord, superiorly by the iliopubic tract and by the iliac crest laterally.  is is known as the “triangle of pain.” (Plate , figure 2.)  is area contains the femoral (), lateral femoral cutaneous (), anterior femoral cutaneous, and the femoral branch of the genitofemoral nerves. Injury to these nerves may cause chronic neuralgia.  e second is the inferior zone bounded by the vas deferens () medially, the gonadal vessels () laterally, and posteriorly by the peritoneal edge.  is zone is known as the “triangle of doom,” as it contains the external iliac vein (), the deep circum­ ex iliac vein, and the femoral artery (). (Plate , figure 2.)
468
469
PLATE
220
R  I H, L T P (TAPP)
INDICATIONS  e indications for inguinal hernia repair have been
described in the preceding chapters.  e techniques that will be described include the transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) and the totally extrap­eritoneal (TEP). Laparoscopic repair may be applied to indirect, direct, or femoral hernias. Laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy is contraindicated in the presence of intraperitoneal infection, irreversible coagulopathy, and in patients who are poor risks for general anesthesia. Relative contraindica­tions include large sliding hernias that contain colon, long-standing irre­ducible scrotal hernias, ascites, and previous suprapubic surgery. For TEP repairs, speci c relative contraindications include incarceration and bowel ischemia. A thorough knowledge of the anatomy of the inguinal region is essential when it is approached posteriorly using a laparoscope.  e view of this area as seen from the intraperitoneal perspective in the TAPP repair, as well as the one from the preperitoneal perspective in TEP, is shown on the preceding Plate  entitled Laparoscopic Anatomy of the Inguinal Region. Additionally, pro ciency with laparoscopic skills or mentored experience with this type of hernia repair is strongly recommended.
TRANSABDOMINAL PREPERITONEAL (TAPP)
PREOPERATIVE PREPARATION  e patient must be a suitable candidate
for general anesthesia. Anticoagulation, aspirin, and antiplatelet drugs such as Clopidogrel Bisulfate (Plavix) must be discontinued in advance of the procedure in order to avoid postoperative hematoma formation. Preopera­tive antibiotics should be administered intravenously within one hour of the incision.
EQUIPMANT AND SUPPLIES All laparoscopic repairs use some form of
prosthetic material.  ese include synthetic mesh created from polypro­pylene (Marlex or Prolene), Dacron (Mersilene), or polyester (Parietex). Expanded polytetra uoroethylene (e-PTFE) (Gortex) is supplied as an extruded sheet. Mesh is generally preferred to e-PTFE because the struc­ture allows  brous in growth and hence greater  xation to the surrounding tissues. e-PTFE, composite mesh, or biologic materials are preferred in situ­ations in which the prosthetic would be in touch with the intestine or other intraabdominal organs, as it promotes less of a  brous response and lessens adhesions to these structures. In this regard, e-PTFE has been modi ed to have polypropylene on one side.  is so-called “dual mesh” might be useful in cases in which the mesh cannot be completely covered by peritoneum.
Fixation of the mesh is necessary to prevent migration and the tendency for the mesh to shrink overtime.  ere are a variety of tacking devices that may be used including helical coils, shaped like a key ring, and anchors.  ey may be absorbable or nonabsorbable metal. Most are delivered with -mm disposable instruments.
ANESTHESIA General endotracheal anesthesia is required.
POSITION  e patient is placed in the supine position, and the arms
are tucked.  e operating room setup and port placements are shown in
figure 1.
OPERATIVE PREPARARTION Skin hair is removed with a clipper. A cath-
eter is placed in the bladder and removed at the end of the case.
INCISION AND EXPOSURE figure 1 shows the typical room setup for a
le inguinal hernia repair by either TAPP or TEP.  e surgeon stands con­tralateral to the hernia.  e camera operator is next to the surgeon and the assistant directly across. One or two monitors may be positioned at the foot of the operating table. In this Plate, a le indirect inguinal TAPP is shown with the surgeon on the patient’s right side, whereas the TEP repair shown in Plate  demonstrates a right direct inguinal repair where the surgeon would be positioned on the patient’s le side.
figures 3 through 7 illustrate a TAPP for a le indirect inguinal hernia.
 e Hasson technique as described in Plate  is used to gain access to the peritoneal cavity. A supraumbilical incision is made for placement of the Hasson trocar.  e patient is placed in a gentle Trendelenburg position.
A -mm -degree laparoscope is passed. Two -mm trocars are placed under direct laparoscopic vision in the right and le mid abdomen at the level of the umbilicus (figure 1). A diagnostic laparoscopy is performed and the hernia spaces inspected for additional hernias. Utilizing the two lateral trocars, a peritoneal  ap is created using laparoscopic scissors and electrocautery.  e incision is begun lateral to the medial umbilical liga­ment, which should not be divided, as this may cause bleeding from a ves­tigial umbilical artery. An incision is made in the peritoneum  to  cm above the hernia sac and carried laterally to the anterior iliac spine.  e preperitoneal space is entered and blunt dissection is carried out with a lap­aroscopic Kittner dissector in the avascular plane between the peritoneum and the transversalis fascia. For a direct hernia, the dissection is begun lat­erally to expose the cord structures and epigastric vessels. As the  ap is dissected, the critical anatomic landmarks from medial to lateral include Cooper’s ligament, the inferior epigastric vessels, the vas deferens, and the lateral zone or fossa (figure 2).  e sites of an indirect and direct hernia are shown. Care should be to avoid dissection in the area labeled the Tri­angle of Pain which contains sensory nerves (figure 2), injury to which may cause chronic pain in the inguinal region, testicle, or thigh. Likewise care is exercised to avoid dissection in the Triangle of Doom (figure 2), the area which contains the major vascular structures. A corona mortis, a branch of the inferior epigastric may be seen on the lateral edge of Cooper’s ligament in  of patients (Plate ).  is must be avoided when dissect­ing Cooper’s ligament or tacking the mesh in order to prevent troublesome bleeding.  e le indirect sac is carefully teased and dissected away from the cord structures as it is brought back into the preperitoneal space. A small indirect sac may be completely reduced, but a larger sac that extends into the scrotum may need to be divided. Downward traction on the cord structures facilitates dissection of fatty tissue in the spermatic cord (cord lipoma).  e iliopubic tract is identi ed (figure 3).  e peritoneal  ap is developed inferiorly. Care is taken to avoid injury to the genital branch of the genitofemoral nerve and the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (Plate ). A er an inferior  ap is created, the following structures are identi ed: the inferior epigastric vessels, the symphysis pubis, and the rectus abdominis. Dissection is then carried medially to the contralateral pubic tubercle to allow su cient overlap for the mesh placement to cover all of the potential hernia spaces. figure 3 demonstrates the  nal peritoneal  ap and space.
For bilateral hernias, the space of Retzius is dissected through two lat­eral incisions avoiding division of the urachus.  is creates a large common space connecting the two sides.
 e mesh is introduced through the -mm trocar (figure 4). For a unilateral repair, it should be preformed or at least  ×  cm. Although not shown in the illustrations for a bilateral repair, two similar sheets of mesh or one large ( ×  cm) may be employed. For the unilateral repair, the mesh is placed over the peritoneal opening so that it covers all of the hernia spaces (direct, indirect, and femoral). A wide overlap is necessary and extends from the contralateral pubic tubercle medially to the ipsilat­eral anterior iliac spine.  e mesh is unrolled and positioned with gener­ous overlap in all directions. A slit may be made for the cord structures. Tacking devices are applied medially to the superior edge and inferior one edge.  is is facilitated by direct counter-pressure by the surgeon’s non­dominant hand.  e lateral edge aspect of the mesh is usually generally not tacked into place because of potential nerve injury (lateral femoral cutaneous and the femoral branch of the genitofemoral nerve).  e mesh is secured medially to the tissues immediately adjacent to the contralateral and the ipsilateral pubic tubercle and Cooper’s ligament (figure 6). Any redundancy in the inferior edge of the mesh should be trimmed in order to avoid rolling up.
 e next step is to close the redundant peritoneum over the mesh.  e mesh needs to be completely covered. Once the mesh is in place, the patient is taken out of the reverse Trendelenburg position. Desu ation to  mmHg is accomplished.  abdominal wall or sutured closed (figure 7).
e peritoneal  ap is then tacked to the anterior
470
471
PLATE
221
R  I H, L, T E (TEP)
Total extraperitoneal (TEP) approach avoids entering the peritoneal cavity; hence, there is the theoretical advantage of less probability for visceral injury or incisional hernias. In addition, it avoids the problem of closure of the peritoneal  ap. It is more di cult than TAPP because the operative space is tight.  e preoperative preparation, anesthesia considerations, patient position, and operating room setup are the same as those for TAPP.
EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES A three-component dissecting balloon
should be used to do the initial dissection of the preperitoneal space (figure 2a, b, c).
INCISION AND EXPOSURE A  cm incision is made just lateral and infe-
rior to the umbilicus on the same side as the hernia.  e muscle is retracted laterally so as to expose the posterior rectus fascia. Blunt dissection with the s-retractors or  nger opens the preperitoneal space. (figure 1b).  e dis- section of this space is facilitated by the use of a three-component dissecting balloon.  is is inserted into the space via the umbilical incision.  e bulb insu ator device is used to expand the balloon. During the insu ation, the surgeon monitors the dissection process with the laparoscope (figures 2a and b).  e expansion is gradual. It is important to have all the creases in the dissecting balloon  atten out.  e balloon is desu ated and removed.  e smaller stay balloon is then inserted (figure 2c) and  lled with  mL of air. It is used to hold traction on the fascia by being retracted back and locked.  is is attached to the CO insu ator, which is set to a pressure of  mmHg.  e patient is placed in a slight Trendelenburg position to avoid external compression of the preperitoneal space by the abdominal viscera.  e hernia spaces are examined. Two -mm trocars are placed in the mid­line inferior to the umbilicus (figure 1a):  e  rst is two  ngerbreadths above the pubic tubercle and the second  ve  ngerbreadths above the pubic tubercle just below the camera port. figure 3 shows the anatomy of the region which is explained in detail in Plate . A right direct inguinal is identi ed and the area is cleared (figure 4).  e pubic tubercle is iden-
ti ed and slight lateral dissection is continued until the obturator vein is visualized. Blunt dissection with laparoscopic Kittner is used to open the preperitoneal space. Small tears in the peritoneum should be repaired in order to prevent competing pneumoperitoneum. If this becomes problem­atic, a Veress needle or -mm trocar can be placed in the peritoneal cavity to release the CO pressure.  e spermatic cord is then skeletonized and the preperitoneal space dissected to the same extent as the TAPP. Although the orientation is di erent, the dissection and the mesh placement are similar to the TAPP.  e mesh is cut to the size and shape shown in figure 5. It is then rolled and inserted under direct vision through the -mm trocar used for the camera (figure 6).  e mesh is unrolled and positioned in order to cover all three hernia areas—indirect, direct, and femoral (figure 7a). It may be tacked medially in place, as described in the TAPP section, avoid­ing the danger points previously discussed (figure 7a). Alternatively, some surgeons prefer to use a  brin-based glue to secure  xation, while others use no  xation while relying upon the de ated peritoneum to anchor the mesh.  e trocars are removed under direct vision.  e CO is slowly vented such that the mesh does not move.  e mesh and collapsing peritoneum are observed as the videoscope is removed.  e  nal position of the mesh in the preperitoneal space is shown in figure 7a.
CLOSURE  e fascia is closed with absorbable interrupted suture.  e
skin is closed with subcuticular absorbable suture.  e bladder catheter is removed prior to leaving the operating room.
POSTOPERATIVE CONSIDERATIONS Local anesthetic may be injected
into the incision sites or instilled into the preperitoneal space to facilitate pain management. If the patient is able to void urine, then he is discharged the day of the surgery if there are no immediate complications.  e patient is also advised not li greater than  pounds (about two gallons of milk) for the  rst week. Return to work is dictated by pain tolerance. Many patients are back to work in  to  days.
472