Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_537_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана
.pdf
becomes essential. In this case, by “essential” we mean the surgeon to help
the patient exhaust all possible ways to prevent surgery. If possible,
preventing the use of drugs and surgery through psychological support to
the patients is an important part of preserving the healthy life of patients.
Minimization of the number of surgeries conducted and maximization of
patient satisfaction may require this approach as long as the patient is
satisfied with the proposed psychological support and living a life
according to the proposed alternatives to undertaking surgeries and drug
use. The strength of the body is designed in a way to accommodate
challenges faced by human beings as we can see from clear evidence of
how people survive through some of the most dramatic diseases.
In the case, when a surgery is needed, the optimization of the surgical
procedure can be helpful for increasing patient satisfaction and specific
outcomes. One of the most recent advancements in this era is 4D printing;
this technology is introduced as the printing method that allows using 3D
printing techniques in the creation of an object that can change its shape or
properties in a way that its reaction to varying conditions can be predicted
over time when exposed to water, air, heat, or an electric current [46].
Given the definition of 4D printing, mimicking of cartilages, tendons, and
muscles as well as other biological elements may not be too far off from
artificial development using 4D printing [50].
References
1. Nguyen, C., et al. (2022). 3D surface imaging technology for objective automated assessment
of facial interventions: A systematic review. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic
Surgery.
2. Jomah, J. (2018). Three-dimensional surface imaging in plastic surgery. Biomedical Journal of
Scientific & Technical Research, 4(3).
3. Tarassoli, S. P., et al. (2020). Facial reconstruction: A systematic review of current image
acquisition and processing techniques. Frontiers in Surgery, 7, 537616.
4. Tzou, C.-H. J., & Frey, M. (2011). Evolution of 3D surface imaging systems in facial plastic
surgery. Facial Plastic Surgery Clinics, 19(4), 591–602.
5. Hsu, J.-H., & Tseng, C.-S. (2000). Application of orthogonal neural network to craniomaxillary
reconstruction. Journal of Medical Engineering & Technology, 24, 262–266.
6.
Melville, J. C., Tran, H. Q., Bhatti, A. K., Manon, V., Young, S., & Wong, M. E. (2020). Is
Reconstruction of Large Mandibular Defects Using Bioengineering Materials Effective?
https://t.me/medicina_free
Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 78, 661.e1–661.e29.
7. Hsu, J.-H., & Tseng, C.-S. (2001). Application of three-dimensional orthogonal neural network
to craniomaxillary reconstruction. Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics, 25, 477–482.
8. Wieja, F., et al. (2022). Development and validation of a parametric human mandible model to
determine internal stresses for the future design optimization of maxillofacial implants. Journal
of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 125, 104893.
9. Minnema, J., Ernst, A., et al. (2022). A review on the application of deep learning for CT
reconstruction, bone segmentation and surgical planning in oral and maxillofacial surgery.
Dento Maxillo Facial Radiology, 51, 20210437.
10. Morais, A., Egger, J., & Alves, V. (2019). Automated computer-aided design of cranial
implants using a deep volumetric convolutional denoising autoencoder. In Á. Rocha, H. Adeli,
L. P. Reis, & S. Costanzo (Eds.), New knowledge in information systems and technologies (pp.
151–160). Springer.
11. Chang, J. B., et al. (2015). Three-dimensional surface imaging in plastic surgery. Plastic and
Reconstructive Surgery, 135(5), 1295–1304.
12. Benson, P. L., Karabenick, S. A., & Lerner, R. M. (1976). Pretty pleases: The effects of
physical attractiveness, race, and sex on receiving help. Journal of Experimental Social
Psychology, 12, 409–415.
13. Moolenburgh, S. E., et al. (2009). The impact of nasal reconstruction following tumour
resection on psychosocial functioning, a clinical-empirical exploration. Psychooncology, 18,
747–752.
14. Lee, E. H., Klassen, A. F., Lawson, J. L., et al. (2016). Patient experiences and outcomes
following facial skin cancer surgery: A qualitative study. The Australasian Journal of
Dermatology, 57, e100–e104.
15. Datta Gupta, N., Etcoff, N. L., & Jaeger, M. M. (2016). Beauty in mind: The effects of physical
attractiveness on psychological well-being and distress. Journal of Happiness Studies, 17,
1313–1325.
16. Dion, K., Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. (1972). What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality
and Social Psychology, 24, 285–290.
17. Langlois, J. H., Kalakanis, L., Rubenstein, A. J., et al. (2000). Maxims or myths of beauty? A
meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 390–423.
18. Heike, C. L., Upson, K., Stuhaug, E., & Weinberg, S. M. (2010). 3D digital
stereophotogrammetry: A practical guide to facial image acquisition. Head & Face Medicine,
6, 18.
19. Honrado, C. P., & Larrabee, W. F., Jr. (2004). Update in three-dimensional imaging in facial
plastic surgery. Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, 12, 327–331.
20.
Abdel-Alim, T., Iping, R., Wolvius, E. B., Mathijssen, I. M. J., Dirven, C. M. F., Niessen, W. J.,
van Veelen, M. L. C., & Roshchupkin, G. V. (2021). Three-dimensional stereophotogrammetry
https://t.me/medicina_free
in the evaluation of craniosynostosis: Current and potential use cases. The Journal of
Craniofacial Surgery, 32(3), 956–963.
21. Oh, T. S., Choi, J. W., & Koh, K. S. (2011). Upper lip asymmetry perception using three-
dimensional anthropometry in patients with unilateral cleft lip deformity. The Journal of
Craniofacial Surgery, 22, 2080–2083.
22. Mercan, E., Morrison, C. S., Stuhaug, E., Shapiro, L. G., & Tse, R. W. (2018). Novel computer
vision analysis of nasal shape in children with unilateral cleft lip. Journal of Cranio-
Maxillofacial Surgery, 46, 35–43.
23. Vachiramon, V., et al. (2020). Different injection patterns of incobotulinumtoxinA for crow’s
feet: A split-face comparative tudy. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and
Venereology, 35, 256.
24. Sun, A. H., & Steinbacher, D. M. (2018). Orthognathic surgery and rhinoplasty: Simultaneous
or staged? Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 141, 322–329.
25. Bared, A., Rashan, A., Caughlin, B. P., & Toriumi, D. M. (2014). Lower lateral cartilage
repositioning: Objective analysis using 3-dimensional imaging. JAMA Facial Plastic Surgery,
16, 261–267.
26. Wang, D., Hou, K., & Zeng, N. (2021). M-shaped auricular cartilage as modified septal
extension graft: A study by three-dimensional anthropometric analysis in Asian rhinoplasty.
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 45, 2287.
27. Choi, J. W., Suh, Y. C., Song, S. Y., & Jeong, W. S. (2017). 3D photogrammetric analysis of the
nasal tip projection and derotation based on the nasal tip quadripod concept. Aesthetic Plastic
Surgery, 41, 608–617.
28. Kim, M. J., Jeon, D. N., Choi, J. W., & Chan, K. S. (2020). 3D photogrammetric analysis in
hump nose correction based on nasal tip projection without dorsal augmentation in Asian
rhinoplasty. Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, 48, 792–799.
29. Kansy, K., Hoffmann, J., Alhalabi, O., et al. (2018). Subjective and objective appearance of
head and neck cancer patients following microsurgical reconstruction and associated quality of
life – A crosssectional study. Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, 46, 1275–1284.
30. Davidson, E., & Kumar, A. R. (2015). A preliminary three-dimensional analysis of nasal
aesthetics following Le Fort I advancement in patients with cleft lip and palate. The Journal of
Craniofacial Surgery, 26, e629–ee33.
31. Yamada, T., Mishima, K., Moritani, N., et al. (2010). Nasolabial morphologic changes after a
Le Fort I osteotomy: A three-dimensional anthropometric study. The Journal of Craniofacial
Surgery, 21, 1089–1095.
32. Verzé, L., Bianchi, F. A., & Ramieri, G. (2014). Three-dimensional laser scanner evaluation of
facial soft tissue changes after LeFort I advancement and rhinoplasty surgery: Patients with
cleft lip and palate vs patients with nonclefted maxillary retrognathic dysplasia (control group).
Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, 117, 416–423.
33.
Kim, M. J., & Oh, T. S. (2020). A nasolabial fold reset technique for enhancing midface lifts in
https://t.me/medicina_free
facial reanimation: Three-dimensional volumetric analysis. Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial
Surgery, 48, 162–169.
34. Qiong, W., Hui, C., Wen, W., et al. (2012). Impulse-based rendering methods for haptic
simulation of bone-burring. IEEE Transactions on Haptics, 5, 344–355.
35. Ferrario, V. F., Sforza, C., Serrao, G., Ciusa, V., & Dellavia, C. (2003). Growth and aging of
facial soft tissues: A computerized three-dimensional mesh diagram analysis. Clinical
Anatomy, 16, 420–433.
36. Kau, C. H., & Richmond, S. (2008). Three-dimensional analysis of facial morphology surface
changes in untreated children from 12 to 14 years of age. American Journal of Orthodontics
and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 134, 751–760.
37. Kau, C. H., Kamel, S. G., Wilson, J., & Wong, M. E. (2011). New method for analysis of facial
growth in a pediatric reconstructed mandible. American Journal of Orthodontics and
Dentofacial Orthopedics, 139, e285–ee90.
38. Hammond, P., Hutton, T. J., Allanson, J. E., et al. (2004). 3D analysis of facial morphology.
American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A, 126A, 339–348.
39. Wilamowska, K., Wu, J., Heike, C., & Shapiro, L. (2012). Shape-based classification of 3D
facial data to support 22q11.2DS craniofacial research. Journal of Digital Imaging, 25, 400–
408.
40. Ji, Y., Zhang, F., Schwartz, J., Stile, F., & Lineaweaver, W. C. (2002). Assessment of facial
tissue expansion with three-dimensional digitizer scanning. The Journal of Craniofacial
Surgery, 13, 687–692.
41. Berssenbrugge, P., Berlin, N. F., Kebeck, G., et al. (2014). 2D and 3D analysis methods of
facial asymmetry in comparison. Journal of Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery, 42, e327–e334.
42. Desmedt, D. J., Maal, T. J., Kuijpers, M. A., et al. (2015). Nasolabial symmetry and esthetics in
cleft lip and palate: Analysis of 3D facial images. Clinical Oral Investigations, 19, 1833–1842.
43. Pratt, R., Deprest, J., Vercauteren, T., Ourselin, S., & David, A. L. (2015). Computer assisted
surgical planning and intraoperative guidance in fetal surgery: A systematic review. Prenatal
Diagnosis, 35, 1159–1166. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1002/ pd. 4660
[Crossref]
44. Giudice, G., & Clemente, E. T. (2022). Maxillofacial surgery, textbook of plastic and
reconstructive surgery – Basic principles and new techniques (M. Maruccia & G. Giudice,
Eds.). Springer.
45. Algarín, J. M., Díaz-Caballero, E., Borreguero, J., et al. (2020). Simultaneous imaging of hard
and soft biological tissues in a low-field dental MRI scanner. Scientific Reports, 10, 21470.
46. Tokgöz, E. (2022). All-inclusive impact of robotics applications on THA: Overall impact of
robotics on total hip arthroplasty patients from manufacturing of implants to recovery after
surgery. In Total hip arthroplasty: Medical and biomedical engineering and science concepts.
Springer. ISBN #: 9783031089268.
47.
https://t.me/medicina_free
Kumari, T., & Ramanathan, A. (2022). Digital technology in craniofacial surgery – Historical
perspectives to current applications. Dentistry Review, 2(1).
48. Antony, A. K., et al. (2011). Use of virtual surgery and stereolithography-guided osteotomy for
mandibular reconstruction with the free fibula. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 128(5),
1080–1084.
49. Hanasono, M. M., & Skoracki, R. J. (2010). 117B: Improving the speed and accuracy of
mandibular reconstruction using preoperative virtual planning and rapid prototype modeling.
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 125(6), 80.
50. Sousa, P. L., Sculco, P. K., Mayman, D. J., Jerabek, S. A., Ast, M. P., & Chalmers, B. P. (2020).
Robots in the operating room during hip and knee arthroplasty. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med,
13(3), 309–317. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s12178-020-09625-z. PMID: 32367430; PMCID:
PMC7251009.
[Crossref]
51. Ahmed, K. S., Ibad, H., Suchal, Z. A., & Gosain, A. K. (2022 Feb). Implementation of 3D
printing and computer-aided design and manufacturing (CAD/CAM) in craniofacial
reconstruction. The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 14, 1714.
52. Lin, L., Liu, X., Gao, Y., Aung, Z. M., Xu, H., Wang, B., Xie, L., Yang, X., & Chai, G. (2022).
The application of augmented reality in craniofacial bone fracture reduction: Study protocol for
a randomized controlled trial. Trials, 23(1), 241.
53. Svalina, A., Vuollo, V., Serlo, W., et al. (2022). Craniofacial characteristics and cosmetic
satisfaction of patients with sagittal and metopic synostosis: A case–control study using 3D
photogrammetric imaging. Child’s Nervous System, 38, 781–788.
54. Aldridge, K., et al. (2005). Precision and error of three-dimensional phenotypic measures
acquired from 3dMD photogrammetric images. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A,
138(3), 247–253.
55. Alqattan, M., et al. (2015). Comparison between landmark and surface-based three-dimensional
analyses of facial asymmetry in adults. European Journal of Orthodontics, 37(1), 1–12.
56. Vuollo, V., et al. (2015). Comparing facial 3D analysis with DNA testing to determine
zygosities of twins. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 18(3), 306–313.
57. White, J. E., et al. (2004). Three-dimensional facial characteristics of Caucasian infants without
cleft and correlation with body measurements. The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal, 41(6),
593–602.
58. Tolleson, S. R., et al. (2010). 3-D analysis of facial asymmetry in children with hip dysplasia.
The Angle Orthodontist, 80(4), 707–712.
59. Gwilliam, J. R., Cunningham, S. J., & Hutton, T. (2006). Reproducibility of soft tissue
landmarks on three-dimensional facial scans. The European Journal of Orthodontics, 28(5),
408–415.
60. Young, N. M., et al. (2016). Facial surface morphology predicts variation in internal skeletal
shape. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 149(4), 501–508.
https://t.me/medicina_free
61.
de Lima, L. S., et al. (2019). Evaluation of facial soft tissue thickness in symmetric and
asymmetric subjects with the use of cone-beam computed tomography. American Journal of
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 155(2), 216–223.
62. Zhang, L., Shen, S., Yu, H., Shen, S. G., & Wang, X. (2015). Computer-aided design and
computer-aided manufacturing hydroxyapatite/epoxide acrylate maleic compound construction
for craniomaxillofacial bone defects. The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 26, 1477–1481.
63. Andrews, B. T., Thurston, T. E., Tanna, N., Broer, P. N., Levine, J. P., Kumar, A., et al. (2015).
A multicenter experience with image-guided surgical navigation: Broadening clinical
indications in complex craniomaxillofacial surgery. The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 26,
1136–1139.
64. Suzuki-Okamura, E., Higashihori, N., Kawamoto, T., & Moriyama, K. (2015). Three-
dimensional analysis of hard and soft tissue changes in patients with facial asymmetry
undergoing 2-jaw surgery. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, 120,
299–306.
65. Liu, T. J., Ko, A. T., Tang, Y. B., Lai, H. S., Chien, H. F., & Hsieh, T. M. (2016). Clinical
application of different surgical navigation systems in complex craniomaxillofacial surgery:
The use of multisurface 3-dimensional images and a 2-plane reference system. Annals of
Plastic Surgery, 76, 411–419.
66. Tarsitano, A., Battaglia, S., Ramieri, V., Cascone, P., Ciocca, L., Scotti, R., et al. (2017). Short
term outcomes of mandibular reconstruction in oncological patients using a CAD/CAM
prosthesis including a condyle supporting a fibular free flap. Journal of Cranio-Maxillo-Facial
Surgery, 45, 330–337.
67. El-Fiky, I., El Sammak, D. A. E. A., El Sammak, A., & Abdelhady, M. (2017). Diagnostic
performance of multi-slice computed tomography using 2D and 3D images in the assessment of
Le fort fractures. Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, 48, 415–424.
68. Tel, A., Costa, F., Sembronio, S., Lazzarotto, A., & Robiony, M. (2018). All-in-one surgical
guide: A new method for cranial vault resection and reconstruction. Journal of Cranio-
Maxillofacial Surgery, 46, 967–973.
69. Thiele, O. C., Nolte, I. M., Mischkowski, R. A., Safi, A. F., Perrin, J., Zinser, M., et al. (2018).
Craniomaxillofacial patient-specific CAD/CAM implants based on cone beam tomography data
- A feasibility study. Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, 46, 1461–1464.
70. Lee, J. H., Kaban, L. B., & Yaremchuk, M. J. (2018). Refining post–orthognathic surgery facial
contour with computer-designed/computer-manufactured alloplastic implants. Plastic and
Reconstructive Surgery, 142(3), 747–755.
71. Straughan, D. M., & Yaremchuk, M. J. (2022). Improving male chin and mandible eesthetics.
Clinics in Plastic Surgery, 49(2), 275–283.
72. Venkatesh, E., & Elluru, S. V. (2017). Cone beam computed tomography: Basics and
applications in dentistry. Journal of Istanbul University Faculty of Dentistry, 51(3 Suppl 1),
S102–S121.
73.
https://t.me/medicina_free
Yang, W. F., Choi, W. S., Leung, Y. Y., Curtin, J. P., Du, R., Zhang, C. Y., Chen, X. S., & Su, Y.
X. (2018). Three-dimensional printing of patientspecific surgical plates in head and neck
reconstruction: A prospective pilot study. Oral Oncology, 78, 31–36.
74. Oh, J. H. (2018). Recent advances in the reconstruction of cranio-maxillofacial defects using
computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing. Maxillofacial Plastic and
Reconstructive Surgery, 40, 2.
75. Pu, J. J., et al. (2022). Current trends in the reconstruction and rehabilitation of jaw following
ablative surgery. Cancers, 14(14), 3308.
76. Yang, W. F., et al. (2021). Three-dimensionally printed patient-specific surgical plates increase
accuracy of oncologic head and neck reconstruction versus conventional surgical plates: A
comparative study. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 28, 363–375.
77. Fu, X., et al. (2017). Standardized protocol for virtual surgical plan and 3-dimensional surgical
template–assisted single-stage mandible contour surgery. Annals of Plastic Surgery, 79(3), 236–
242.
78. Mascha, F., et al. (2017). Accuracy of computer-assisted mandibular reconstructions using
patient specific implants in combination with CAD/CAM fabricated transfer keys. Journal of
Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery, 45, 1884–1897.
79. Sawh-Martinez, R., Parsaei, Y., Wu, R., Lin, A., Metzler, P., DeSesa, C., et al. (2017).
Improved temporomandibular joint position after 3-dimensional planned mandibular
reconstruction. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 75, 197–206.
80. Kraeima, J., Dorgelo, B., Gulbitti, H. A., Steenbakkers, R., Schepman, K. P., Roodenburg, J. L.
N., et al. (2018). Multi-modality 3D mandibular resection planning in head and neck cancer
using CT and MRI data fusion: A clinical series. Oral Oncology, 81, 22–28.
81. Davies, J. C., Chan, H. H. L., Jozaghi, Y., Goldstein, D. P., & Irish, J. C. (2019). Analysis of
simulated mandibular reconstruction using a segmental mirroring technique. Journal of Cranio-
Maxillo-Facial Surgery, 47, 468–472.
82. Zhang, M., Rao, P., Xia, D., Sun, L., Cai, X., & Xiao, J. (2019). Functional reconstruction of
mandibular segment defects with individual preformed reconstruction plate and computed
tomographic angiography-aided iliac crest flap. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 77,
1293–1304.
83. Pu, J. J., et al. (2020). Do predetermined surgical margins compromise oncological safety in
computer-assisted head and neck reconstruction? Oral Oncology, 111, 104914.
84. Wilde, F., Hanken, H., Probst, F., Schramm, A., Heiland, M., & Cornelius, C. P. (2015).
Multicenter study on the use of patient-specific CAD/CAM reconstruction plates for
mandibular reconstruction. International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery,
10, 2035–2051.
85. Ma, H., Shujaat, S., Van Dessel, J., Sun, Y., Bila, M., Vranckx, J., Politis, C., & Jacobs, R.
(2021). Adherence to computer-assisted surgical planning in 136 maxillofacial reconstructions.
Frontiers in Oncology, 11, 713606.
86.
https://t.me/medicina_free
Pietruski, P., Majak, M., Swiatek-Najwer, E., Zuk, M., Popek, M., Mazurek, M., Swiecka, M.,
& Jaworowski, J. (2019). Supporting mandibular resection with intraoperative navigation
utilizing augmented reality technology—A proof of concept study. Journal of Cranio-
Maxillofacial Surgery, 47, 854–859.
87. Shi, Y., Lin, L., Zhou, C., Zhu, M., Xie, L., & Chai, G. (2017). A study of an assisting robot for
mandible plastic surgery based on augmented reality. Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied
Technologies, 26, 23–30.
88. Zhu, M., Liu, F., Chai, G., Pan, J. J., Jiang, T., Lin, L., Xin, Y., Zhang, Y., & Li, Q. (2017). A
novel augmented reality system for displaying inferior alveo-lar nerve bundles in maxillofacial
surgery. Scientific Reports, 7, 42365.
89. Badiali, G., Ferrari, V., Cutolo, F., Freschi, C., Caramella, D., Bianchi, A., & Marchetti, C.
(2014). Augmented reality as an aid in maxillofacial surgery: Validation of a wearable system
allowing maxillary repositioning. Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, 42, 1970–1976.
90. Benmahdjoub, M., van Walsum, T., van Twisk, P., & Wolvius, E. B. (2021). Augmented reality
in craniomaxillofacial surgery: Added value and proposed recommendations through a
systematic review of the literature. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery,
50, 969–978.
91. Liang, Y., Huan, J., Li, J.-D., Jiang, C., Fang, C., & Liu, Y. (2020). Use of artificial intelligence
to recover mandibular morphology after disease. Scientific Reports, 10, 16431.
92. Rowe, S. P., Zinreich, S. J., & Fishman, E. K. (2018). 3D cinematic rendering of the calvarium,
maxillofacial structures, and skull base: preliminary observations. The British Journal of
Radiology, 91(1086), 20170826. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1259/ bjr. 20170826. Epub 2018 Mar 7.
PMID: 29365292; PMCID: PMC6223288.
[Crossref]
93. Eid, M., et al. (2017). Cinematic rendering in CT: A novel, lifelike 3D visualization technique.
American Journal of Roentgenology, 209, 370–379.
94. Tao, X., Yin, X., Zhu, F., & Chen, W. (1999). The clinical application of computerized three-
dimensional mimic operation for maxillofacial bone tumor. Journal of Tongji Medical
University, 19, 328–330. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ BF0288697560
[Crossref]
95. Shaye, D. A., Tollefson, T. T., & Strong, E. B. (2015). Use of intraoperative computed
tomography for maxillofacial reconstructive surgery. JAMA Facial Plastic Surgery, 17(2), 113–
119. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1001/ jamafacial. 2014. 1343. Erratum in: JAMA Facial Plastic Surgery.
2015 May–June;17(3):227.
[Crossref]
96. Tarsitano, A., et al. (2016). Surgical reconstruction of maxillary defects using a computer-
assisted design/computer-assisted manufacturing-produced titanium mesh supporting a free
flap. Journal of Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery, 44(9), 1320–1326.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2016.07.013. Epub 2016 Jul 21.
97.
Zheng, G. S., et al. (2016). Maxillary reconstruction assisted by preoperative planning and
accurate surgical templates. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology,
https://t.me/medicina_free
121, 233–238.
98. Frellesen, C., et al. (2018, August). High-pitch dual-source paranasal sinus CT in agitated
patients with maxillofacial trauma: Analysis of image quality, motion artifacts, and dose
aspects. Acta Radiologica, 59(8), 909–916. https://doi.org/10.1177/0284185117740931. Epub
2017 Nov 6.
99. Azarmehr, I., et al. (2020). Contemporary techniques in orbital reconstruction: A review of the
literature and report of a case combining surgical navigation, computer-aided surgical
simulation, and a patient-specific implant. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 78(4),
594–609.
100. Chu, Y. Y., Yang, J. R., Lai, B. R., et al. (2022). Preliminary outcomes of the surgical
navigation system combined with intraoperative three-dimensional C-arm computed
tomography for zygomatico-orbital fracture reconstruction. Scientific Reports, 12, 7893.
101. Sukegawa, S., Kanno, T., & Furuki, Y. (2018). Application of computer-assisted navigation
systems in oral and maxillofacial surgery. The Japanese Dental Science Review, 54, 139–149.
102. Tarsitano, A., Badiali, G., Pizzigallo, A., & Marchetti, C. (1822–1825). Orbital reconstruction:
Patient-specific orbital floor reconstruction using a mirroring technique and a customized
titanium mesh. The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 27, 1822.
103. Chen, C. T., et al. (2018). Clinical outcomes for minimally invasive primary and secondary
orbital reconstruction using an advanced synergistic combination of navigation and endoscopy.
Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, 71, 90–100.
104. Yang, J. R., & Liao, H. T. (2019). Functional and aesthetic outcome of extensive orbital floor
and medial wall fracture via navigation and endoscope-assisted reconstruction. Annals of
Plastic Surgery, 82, S77–S85.
105. Wilde, F., et al. (2005). Intraoperative imaging with a 3D C-arm system after zygomatico-
orbital complex fracture reduction. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 71, 894–910.
106. Shyu, V. B., et al. (2021). Clinical outcome following intraoperative computed tomography-
assisted secondary orbital reconstruction. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic
Surgery, 74, 341–349.
107. Sharma, P., Rattan, V., Rai, S., & Chhabbra, R. (2020). Does intraoperative computed
tomography improve the outcome in zygomatico-orbital complex fracture reduction? Journal
of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 20, 189–200.
108. Westendorff, C., Gülicher, D., Dammann, F., Reinert, S., & Hoffmann, J. (2006). Computer-
assisted surgical treatment of orbitozygomatic fractures. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 17,
837–842.
109. Shin, H. S., Kim, S. Y., Cha, H. G., Han, B. L., & Nam, S. M. (2016). Real time navigation-
assisted orbital wall reconstruction in blowout fractures. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 27,
370–373.
110.
Steiert, C., Behringer, S., Kraus, L., et al. (2022). Augmented reality–assisted craniofacial
reconstruction in skull base lesions — An innovative technique for single-step resection and
https://t.me/medicina_free
cranioplasty in neurosurgery. Neurosurgical Review, 45, 2745.
111. Kwon, J., Barrera, J. E., Jung, T. Y., & Most, S. P. (2009). Measurements of orbital volume
change using computed tomography in isolated orbital blowout fractures. Archives of Facial
Plastic Surgery, 11, 395–398. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1001/ archfacial. 2009. 77
[Crossref]
112. Novelli, G., Tonellini, G., Mazzoleni, F., Bozzetti, A., & Sozzi, D. (2014). Virtual surgery
simulation in orbital wall reconstruction: Integration of surgical navigation and
stereolithographic models. Journal of Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery, 42, 2025–2034. https://
doi. org/ 10. 1016/ j. jcms. 2014. 09. 009
[Crossref]
113. Tsao, K., Cheng, A., Goss, A., & Donovan, D. (2014). The use of cone beam computed
tomography in the postoperative assessment of orbital wall fracture reconstruction. The Journal
of Craniofacial Surgery, 25, 1150–1154. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1097/ SCS. 0000000000000747
[Crossref]
114. Tarsitano, A., Badiali, G., Pizzigallo, A., & Marchetti, C. (2016). Orbital reconstruction:
Patient-specific orbital floor reconstruction using a mirroring technique and a customized
titanium mesh. The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 27, 1822–1825. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1097/
SCS. 0000000000002907
[Crossref]
115. Gander, T., Blumer, M., Rostetter, C., Wagner, M., Zweifel, D., Schumann, P., et al. (2018).
Intraoperative 3-dimensional cone beam computed tomographic imaging during reconstruction
of the zygoma and orbit. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, 126,
192–197. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/ j. oooo. 2018. 04. 008
[Crossref]
116. Gibelli, D., Cellina, M., Gibelli, S., Oliva, A. G., Termine, G., Pucciarelli, V., et al. (2018).
Assessing symmetry of zygomatic bone through three-dimensional segmentation on computed
tomography scan and “mirroring” procedure: A contribution for reconstructive maxillofacial
surgery. Journal of Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery, 46, 600–604. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/ j.
jcms. 2018. 02. 012
[Crossref]
117. Sozzi, D., Gibelli, D., Canzi, G., Tagliaferri, A., Monticelli, L., Cappella, A., et al. (2018).
Assessing the precision of posttraumatic orbital reconstruction through “mirror” orbital
superimposition: A novel approach for testing the anatomical accuracy. Journal of Cranio-
Maxillo-Facial Surgery, 46, 1258–1262. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/ j. jcms. 2018. 05. 040
[Crossref]
118. Kim, H., Son, T.-G., Lee, J., Kim, H. A., Cho, H., Jeong, W. S., et al. (2019). Three-
dimensional orbital wall modeling using paranasal sinus segmentation. Journal of Cranio-
Maxillo-Facial Surgery, 47, 959–967. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/ j. jcms. 2019. 03. 028
[Crossref]
119.
Dong, Q. N., Karino, M., Koike, T., Ide, T., Okuma, S., Kaneko, I., et al. (2020). Navigation
assisted isolated medial orbital wall fracture reconstruction using an UHA/ PLLA sheet via a
https://t.me/medicina_free
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана