Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / @xirurgi_2025 / @xirurgi_2025 - 881 - файл

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
9 Мб
Скачать
4 Perioperative Management
55
from 1h to 30min prior. A recent meta-analysis showed that the pre-anesthesia does not involve a substantial reduction of postoperative pain but leads to an extended phase of postoperative unconsciousness [10].
The use of anxiolytics with short action is preferred in ERAS protocol and can help anxious patients during insertion of the epidural catheter and generally in the postoperative period in controlling the pain and avoiding the excessive use of opi­oids. Long half-life sedatives should not be used for routine procedures and should be avoided 12h prior to the surgery as they can hinder a rapid recovery of mobility and oral nutrition.
4.5.2 The Intraoperative Phase
Antibiotic prophylaxis, in the elderly as in younger patients, is effective in reducing infectious complications and therefore uniformly recommended for all major surgi­cal operations. The single-dose (“ultra-short-term prophylaxis”) and a multidose regimens (“short-term prophylaxis”) have proven equally effective, although mul­tiple doses are indicated for interventions exceeding 3h, in accordance with the pharmacokinetics of the chosen antibiotic [11].
In traditional management opioids are often used for intraoperative analgesia. The choice of the anesthetic technique specied in the ERAS protocol must take two fundamental aspects into account: on the one hand the use of short-acting agents (such as Propofol the other, an anesthetic procedure that minimizes surgical stress.
Epidural analgesia is an important anti-catabolic tool, used to prevent postopera­tive insulin resistance. The surgical trauma causes the stimulation of central and peripheral nerve pathways and leads to the catabolic response to surgery. In this light, the nociceptive segmental block at the spinal cord level guarantees not only adequate pain control but helps to limit catabolic effects, participating directly in a better outcome.
The anesthetic technique with neuraxial block and epidural analgesia is the only one able to alter the stress response. The benets could result from different mecha­nisms, including an increase in blood ow, more effective breathing without pain, and, not least, by a reduction of multifactorial components of the response to surgi­cal stress. The use of epidural catheters is also increasingly widespread in the man­agement of postoperative pain: it provides for the systemic administration of different types of analgesics or for the application of systemic and regional analge­sia together, making the control of pain and the reduction of side effects associated with the use of opioids possible in this way.
Epidural analgesia has also been shown to be superior to intravenous analgesia in postoperative pain control in both traditional surgery and in minimally invasive sur­gery, allowing a reduction in the paralytic ileus due to selective blockade of δ nocicep­tive bers. Although there are few studies that have evaluated the impact of different anesthetic techniques on postoperative outcomes, there is no evidence that compares intravenous anesthetic to that of inhaled. It seems clear that the ERAS protocol makes
®
) that allow a more rapid onset of postoperative recovery and, on
56
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
P. Palumbo et al.
a great effort to minimize the impact of anesthetic agents in order to promote rapid postoperative awakening and thus facilitate the recovery of the functions [12].
For this reason, the use of short-acting hypnotic inductor agents, such as propo­fol, is recommended, combined with a short half-life opioid such as fentanyl and remifentanil in bolus or continuous infusion. With regard to the maintenance phase, the ERAS method does not provide for the use of exclusive inhaler agents, in order to obtain the reduction in the incidence of PONV caused by nitric oxide, even if it is administered in the antiemetic prophylaxis.
The blockade of the neuraxial system prolonged to the postoperative phase involves additional benets in many patients: a recent meta-analysis showed an overall reduction in mortality of 30% and signicant reduction of other complica­tions [13].
By virtue of these multiple benets of epidural analgesia, this procedure is pref­erable in the ERAS protocol.
The trauma resulting from surgery involves two types of damage:
1. The primary injury determined by surgical incision, by tissue manipulation, and
by the mobilization of the viscera
2. Secondary damage related to blood loss during surgery, the effects of the anes-
thetic technique, and the intraoperative administration of drugs
Reduction of these two types of damage can be obtained by exploiting the advan­tages offered by the use of minimally invasive surgical techniques.
Minimally invasive surgery allows the optimization of surgical damage through minimizing the incision extent and carefully carrying out dissection without com­promising radicality and surgical accuracy.
In this way, the muscle bers are moved away from each other instead of being etched (splitting vs. cutting); also, a better hemostatic control can be achieved, with easier identication of cleavage planes in a bloodless eld. The magnication of images also proves benecial in reducing the irritation of the serous, in limiting the formation of adhesions and incidence of hematoma or postoperative bleeding.
The minimally invasive approach seems to have signicant short-term advan­tages over open surgery, such as the reduction of postoperative pain, early recovery of intestinal motility, improved lung function, reduced hospitalization, and a better quality of life in the rst 30days.
However, the use of minimally invasive techniques proved that it is not possible to completely change the effects of the endocrine-metabolic responses to surgical stress while limiting the immunodysfunction, the inammatory response, pulmo­nary stress, and hypoxemia when compared with the laparotomic approach.
Moreover, some long-term outcome studies do not reveal the substantial differ­ence expected, but report as equivalent the use of open and minimally invasive tech­niques [
14].
By contrast, the multicenter study “LAFA Study 1” and other scientic research demonstrated a real benet in the application of laparoscopic techniques in the mul­timodal strategy of rapid postoperative recovery [15, 16].
4 Perioperative Management
57
In recent years, the spread of new and alternative minimally invasive surgery techniques, including robotic surgery, laparoscopic techniques with single incision (SILS), and the “hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery” (HALS), has shown that it is possible to reduce invasiveness.
These techniques are mainly used in highly specialized centers, but their use is still not widespread, as there are not substantial data in favor of showing any real advantage to justify their becoming more widespread.
The metabolic response to surgical stress determines the alteration of the balance of uids and electrolytes, as well as temperature and blood rheology. Through the AT1 receptor placed on the muscular coat of the vessels, angiotensin causes vaso­constriction and the production and release of several proinammatory cytokines. The resulting water retention is accompanied by a reduced excretion of sodium and increased excretion of potassium.
In addition, the activation of inammatory responses compromises the ability of the organism to achieve a proper metabolic balance and to maintain the volume and composition of the extracellular and intracellular uid constant. The colloid osmotic pressure is altered in a negative sense, and this leads to an increased permeability of capillaries and a passage of uids from the capillary bed interstitium.
The management of uid therapy provided in the ERAS protocol is designed to counter these events: strong recommendations in this program suggest the adoption of a restrictive regime, as the excessive administration of uids can affect the circu­latory district and heart function.
Therefore, it must be recommended to limit the infusion of colloids and crystal­loids, generally administered in order to avoid transfusions and the reduction in renal blood ow. In fact, excessive preload, particularly in the elderly, may depress cardiac function and lead to increased comorbidity such as cardiology and pulmo­nary ones, to the point of acute lung injury (ALI) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).
The physiological electrolyte balance should therefore remain stable throughout the perioperative period, and in every single moment of the care path, this should be monitored to achieve the maintenance of the “steady state,” which represents the state in which the volume and composition of the body uids remain constant despite the quantitative and qualitative changes of water and solutes.
For this purpose, not more than 3L of uid per day is administered, and a bowel preparation is avoided; moreover, uid intake control before treatment also allows the prevention of edema, associated with a prolongation postoperative ileus and reduced cell oxygenation.
“Goal-directed uid therapy” involves the administration of intraoperative crystal­loid at a rate of 2–3mL/kg/h adequate to prevent an increase in weight of more than
2.5kg, preferring isotonic and balanced solutions than the 0.9% saline solution.
Regarding colloidal solutions, their adoption has been deprecated by recent stud­ies. In elderly patients, they signicantly alter hemostasis and can lead to acute renal failure.
The ERAS protocol provides for the removal of the nasogastric tube even before the patient’s awakening from anesthesia. There is no evidence to support
58
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
P. Palumbo et al.
its use in the postoperative period; a Cochrane meta-analysis of 37 studies, enlist­ing more than 5000 patients undergoing laparotomy for abdominal surgery, docu­mented a slower functional recovery after surgery, a higher incidence of postoperative ileus, and an increased risk of complications in subjects in which the SNG is left in place [17].
Finally, intraoperative hypothermia prevention reduces the endocrine response and the sympathetic reexes, allowing a limitation of the body’s response to surgi­cal stress caused by the intervention; in addition, it does not impair the coagulation tests, resulting in a reduction of bleeding.
Preventing hypothermia through the infusion of uids at appropriate tempera­tures or the use of a thermal blanket reduces surgical site infections, cardiac compli­cations, bleeding, and the need for blood transfusion.
In the immediate postoperative period, it also prevents the effects of desaturation and myocardial ischemic accidents due to the sudden increase in blood concentra­tions of norepinephrine caused by the drop in body temperature and prolongs the overall time for anesthesia.
4.5.3 The Postoperative Phase
Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) are the most common complications in the immediate postoperative period, affecting 20–30% of patients undergoing abdominal surgery.
It appears within 24h after surgery and contributes to postoperative morbidity, as possible causes of aspiration pneumonia, wound dehiscence, and hydroelectrolytic alterations.
Some endogenous molecules such as serotonin (5-HT), substance P, and other mediators capable of transmitting a signal to the afferent nerve bers would assume relevant importance.
Various risk factors have been associated with the development of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Among them the strongest predictor appears to be gender, with women at double the risk compared to men. A system of stratication of the PONV risk is represented by the Apfel simplied score.
To avoid the unpleasant effects of PONV, it is necessary to focus attention on strategies that include the use of regional anesthesia, the use of short-acting anes­thetic agents, the avoidance of nitric oxide, adequate hydration, and a restricted use of opioids.
In addition, administration of supplemental oxygen has been shown to have a clear benet in reducing PONV. Goll et al. in a randomized study observed 240 patients and concluded that 2h of oxygen at 80% is more effective and less costly than ondansetron in reducing PONV [18].
In high-risk patients, a combination therapy with the use of multiple drugs is recommended, increasing the probability of success over monotherapy, since the use of just one drug has only proved able to reduce the incidence by around 25%.
Delirium is perhaps the most signicant age-related postoperative complication.
4 Perioperative Management
59
It is characterized by a sharp decline in cognitive function and attention and episodes of consciousness uctuation and occurs in approximately 40% of patients undergoing surgery. It can occur in patients of any age but is most common in the elderly, especially those who have already shown cognitive impairment in the pre­operative stage. Its etiology is multifactorial, depending on physiological imbal­ances caused by stress related to the intervention, the use of drugs in the intraoperative and postoperative period, or by a pre-existing condition of fragility and the susceptibility of the patient. The pathogenetic mechanism is not entirely clear, but several studies show a predominant role of the pathways of systemic inammation and increased production of cytokines such as TNF.Delirium is asso­ciated with worse surgical outcomes, longer hospital stays, functional decline, higher institutionalization rates, mortality, and costs due to increased resource utilization.
To fully understand the pathophysiological basis of this phenomenon, consider­ation must be given to the risk factors and precipitating factors; for this purpose, different scores are considered to assist in recognizing patients at higher risk of postoperative delirium. The basic elements for risk stratication are age; pre­existing cognitive impairment; the use of antianxiety drugs such as benzodiazepines (BDZ); sleep disorders; alteration of laboratory values, particularly the function tests of the liver and kidney; and a history of alcohol abuse.
Hospital environments should favor proper hydration, the limited use of opioids and benzodiazepines, and an early empowerment.
Postoperative pain is one of the main variables in the recovery of patients and is one of the main factors that contributes to prolonging the postoperative hospital stay.
Traditionally, the control of postoperative pain is entrusted to plentiful intrave­nous administration of morphine. However, its use is burdened by side effects poorly tolerated by the patient especially if elderly, important among which are respiratory depression, inhibition of cough reex, paralytic ileus, orthostatic hypo­tension, nausea, and vomiting. Moreover, the activation of opioid receptors for neu­ropeptides in the myenteric plexus inhibits the release of acetylcholine from the nerve endings, causing a decrease in the tonus of the smooth muscle cell and an impaired motility of the intestinal wall.
In the geriatric patient, multimodal pain control is more appropriate. The surgical incision and the manipulation of the intestinal bowel tissue cause the release of chemical mediators such as adenosine, bradykinin, cytokines, prostaglandins, TNF, and IL-1 that determines a sensitization of the peripheral sensory system, resulting in a lowering of the threshold of activation of nociceptors.
In particular, the prostaglandin 2 (PGE-2) at the spinal level leads to liberation of additional excitatory mediators, amplifying pain and allowing maintenance.
The thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) involves the insertion of the catheter pref­erably at the mid-thoracic level (T6–T7, T7–T8) for both analgesia and the sympa­thetic block, avoiding the paralysis of the intestinal tract. This method is the gold standard for proper pain management in patients undergoing laparoscopic abdomi­nal surgery [19].
60
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
P. Palumbo et al.
If activated before the surgery, neuraxial blockade prevents hormonal release and attenuates postoperative insulin resistance, reducing the need for administering anesthetic agents.
Alternatives for the control of postoperative pain are represented by the use of opioids intravenously issued from a patient’s device on demand (patient-controlled analgesia—PCA). An additional method is the “continuous wound infusion of local anesthetic”; in this technique, a “multiholed” catheter (multiperforated) is placed by the surgeon at the end of the intervention, increasing the duration of action of the drug and the tissue inltration effectiveness. The incidence of failure of this tech­nique is very low (1%) and its toxicity almost none. In addition, further multimodal analgesia strategies are to be considered. The block of the transverse abdominis plane (TAP) and the rectus fascia represents alternative solutions and may play an important role in the context of major abdominal surgery. Finally, another technique is represented by the inltration of local anesthetic into the peritoneal cavity (IPLA) by elastomeric pump: it allows the blocking of nociceptive pathways of visceral pain.
The postoperative ileus is one of the main iatrogenic complications occurring in the postoperative period; its onset is part of the metabolic response to surgical stress.
Its etiology is multifactorial: factors favoring and triggering are represented by inammation, changes in uid and electrolytes, and the administration of drugs; the set of these triggers determines the contractility and altered bowel motility and edema of the wall.
It is one of the major factors that increases the morbidity of the patient, resulting in prolonged recovery time and hospital stay, but nevertheless is considered a nor­mal and inevitable response to laparotomy and other surgical procedures.
The postoperative ileus involves a series of negative and unpleasant conse­quences, especially for the geriatric patient submitted to surgery: an increase of postoperative pain, an increased likelihood of pulmonary complications, and a post­ponement of the return to a normal oral feeding are observed. This latest issue is of crucial importance for the activation of the immune system and in the recovery of residual functionality.
In ERAS protocol, epidural analgesia is essential to prevent postoperative para­lytic ileus and to stimulate intestinal motility. At the level of the abdominal area, it allows a reduction of the adrenergic tone and the pathway’s transmission of the nociceptive signal activation. Furthermore, the use of restrictive infusion therapy prevents the accumulation of liquids in the intestine, thus preventing an overdisten­sion of the bers of the bowel wall. Also available to the ileum, prevention tools are the “opioid-sparing analgesia,” the avoidance of the use of SNG in the postoperative phase, early removal of urinary catheter and drainage when positioned, the use of magnesium oxide per os, as well as early oral nutrition.
This should be initiated some hours after surgery, with at least the administration of clear liquids and, in the absence of PONV, continuing with solid foods from the rst postoperative day. This supports the early resumption of intestinal motility.
The lure not only promotes the risk of venous thrombosis, insulin resistance, and muscle breakdown resulting in decreased strength and osteoporosis but also has a negative effect on lung function and oxygenation of tissues.
4 Perioperative Management
61
Patients should be encouraged to early mobilization as from the rst postopera­tive day. A daily exercise program must be established, and the daily compilation, in patient care, of a diary helps achieve the objectives. From the day of surgery, patients should stay out of bed for 2h, increasing to at least 6h after the rst post­operative day.
Various factors oppose early mobilization, poor compliance by patients, comor­bidities, and the effects of any complications occurring after surgery; these all rep­resent barriers to early ambulation and are the main causes of failure in the ERAS protocol.
The rationale behind early mobilization is in reducing the length of hospital stay, but, above all, it conveys a positive and important message of psychological empow­erment for elderly patients, which in turn plays an active role in the healing and recovery process, essential to a speedy return to normal daily life.
Conclusions
Geriatric patients, always considered “unt” for their poor performance status,
are often excluded from the development of ERAS paths because they are con-
sidered high risk.
In several randomized controlled trials, the elderly represented only a small part of the recruited sample. A recent systematic review by Bagnall etal. [20] reports that the ERAS protocol is safe and can be applied in elderly patients, allowing a reduction in postoperative morbidity and a reduction in the length of stay (LOS) when compared with traditional care pathways. In addition, the data show that neither advanced age nor a high degree ASA has resulted in a higher rate of com­plications or postoperative mortality, in contrast to what is generally stated.
Patient compliance is considered, on the basis of the scientic evidence, as a predictor of success of the surgical procedure, as well as having a better postop­erative outcome and a lower rate of complications; this is valid in the advanced age of the patient, in whom the overall health status components are closely con­nected to each other.
Few data have been reported regarding the compliance of the elderly patient, but recent studies show that optimal compliance can also be obtained in these subjects, with a positive impact on outcome in the short term, even in patients with a higher ASA grade and poorer performance status [21].
Evidence shows that the multidisciplinary team should always work toward a strong common goal and make a continuous effort to educate patients in order to involve them in all stages of the surgical pathway.
References
1. Sue Brown A, Brummel-Smith K, Burgess L, D’Agostino RB, Goldschmidt JW, Halter JB, Hazzard WR, Jahnigen DW, Phelps C, Raskind M, Schrier RW, Sox HC, Sankey VW.National Institutes of Health consensus development conference statement: geriatric assessment meth­ods for clinical decision-making. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1988;36(4):342–7.
62
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
P. Palumbo et al.
2. Copeland GP, Jones D, Walters M.POSSUM: a scoring system for surgical audit. Br J Surg. 1991;78(3):355–60.
3. Varadhan KK, Lobo DN, Ljungqvist O.Enhanced recovery after surgery: the future of improv­ing surgical care. Crit Care Clin. 2010;26(3):527–47.
4. Noblett SE, Watson DS, Huong H, Davison B, Hainsworth PJ, Horgan AF. Pre-operative oral carbohydrate loading in colorectal surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Color Dis. 2006;8(7):563–9.
5. Green CR, Pandit SK, Schork MA.Preoperative fasting time: is the traditional policy chang­ing? Results of a national survey. Anesth Analg. 1996;83:123–8.
6. Alexander NG, Smith G.Gastroesophageal reux and aspiration of gastric contents in anes­thetic practice. Anesth Analg. 2001;93:494–513.
7. Brady M, Kinn S, Stuart P.Preoperative fasting for adults to prevent perioperative complica­tions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;4:CD004423.
8. Guenaga KF, Matos D, Castro AA, Atallah AN, Wille-Jørgensen P. Mechanical bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery [update of: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;(2):CD001544]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;1:CD001544.
9. Ram E, Sherman Y, Weil R, Vishne T, Kravarusic D, Dreznik Z.Is mechanical bowel prep­aration mandatory for elective colon surgery? A prospective randomized study. Arch Surg. 2005;140(3):285–8.
10. Smith AF, Pittaway AJ.Premedication for anxiety in adult day surgery [update of: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;(3):CD002192]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;1:CD002192.
11. Bratzler DW, Houck PM, Surgical Infection Prevention Guidelines Writers Workgroup; American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; American Association of Critical Care Nurses; American Association of Nurse Anesthetists; American College of Surgeons; American College of Osteopathic Surgeons; American Geriatrics Society; American Society of Anesthesiologists; American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons; American Society of Health-System Pharmacists; American Society of Perianesthesia Nurses; Ascension Health; Association of Perioperative Registered Nurses; Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology; Infectious Diseases Society of America; Medical Letter; Premier; Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America; Society of Thoracic Surgeons; Surgical Infection Society. Antimicrobial prophylaxis for surgery: an advisory statement from the National Surgical Infection Prevention Project. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;38(12):1706–15.
12. Kehlet H, Wilmore DW.Evidence-based surgical care and the evolution of fast-track surgery. Ann Surg. 2008;248(2):189–98.
13. Madsen MV, Staehr-Rye AK, Gatke MR, Claudius C.Neuromuscular blockade for optimising surgical conditions during abdominal and gynaecological surgery: a systematic review. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2015;59:1–16.
14. Khan S, Gatt M, MacFie J.Enhanced recovery programmes and colorectal surgery: does the laparoscope confer additional advantages? Color Dis. 2009;11(9):902–8.
15. Vlug MS, Wind J, Hollmann MW, Ubbink DT, Cense HA, Engel AF, Gerhards MF, van Wagensveld BA, van der Zaag ES, van Geloven AA, Sprangers MA, Cuesta MA, Bemelman WA, LAFA study group. Laparoscopy in combination with fast track multimodal management is the best perioperative strategy in patients undergoing colonic surgery: a randomized clinical trial (LAFA-study). Ann Surg. 2011;254(6):868–75.
16. Spanjersberg WR, van Sambeeck JD, Bremers A, Rosman C, van Laarhoven CJ.Systematic review and meta-analysis for laparoscopic versus open colon surgery with or without an ERAS programme. Surg Endosc. 2015;29(12):3443–53.
17. Nelson R, Edwards S, Tse B.Prophylactic nasogastric decompression after abdominal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;3:CD004929.
18. Goll V, Akca O, Greif R, etal. Ondansetron is no more effective than supplemental intra­operative oxygen for prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Anesth Analg. 2001;92:112–7.
4 Perioperative Management
19. Young Jin Kim MD, Hyun Min Cho MD, Chee Soon Yoon MD, Chan Kyu Lee MD, Tae Yeon Lee MD, June Pill Seok MD.Thoracic epidural Anesthesia and analgesia (TEA) in patients with rib fractures. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011 Apr;44(2):178–82.
20. Bagnall NM, Malietzis G, Kennedy RH, Athanasiou T, Faiz O, Darzi A.A systematic review of enhanced recovery care after colorectal surgery in elderly patients. Color Dis. 2014;16:947–56.
21. Braga M, Pecorelli N, Scatizzi M, Borghi F, Missana G, Radrizzani D.Enhanced recovery program in high-risk patients undergoing colorectal surgery: results from the perioperative Italian society registry. World J Surg. 2017;41(3):860–7.
63
Risk ofVenous Thromboembolism
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
inSurgical Elderly Patients
AnnaFalanga andViolaMilesi
5.1 Introduction
Venous thromboembolism (VTE), which includes deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), is recognized as a complex multifactorial disease, involving clinical and genetic risk factors as well as environmental interactions. The annual incidence varies from 1 to 3 events for every 1000 people in the world. In particular, the annual incidence of VTE in Europe varies from 104 to 180 per 100,000 persons per year [1]. Numerous factors, both transient (i.e., surgery, trauma, prolonged immobility, long trips, hormone therapy, pregnancy, and postpartum) and permanent (i.e., incurable tumors, antiphospholipid syndrome), favor its develop­ment. Therefore, when VTE occurs concomitantly or after any of these recognizable risk factors, it is classied as “secondary” VTE.Otherwise, when it occurs in the absence of any of these risk factors, it is classied as “idiopathic” VTE.
Survival after VTE is worse than expected, and survival after PE is even worse than after DVT alone; in fact the risk of early death among patients with symptom­atic PE is 18-fold higher compared to patients with DVT alone [2]. PE is an inde­pendent predictor of reduced survival for up to 3months after onset. For almost one-quarter of PE patients, the initial clinical presentation is sudden death. Independent predictors of reduced early survival after VTE include increasing age, male gender, lower body mass index, connement to a hospital or nursing home, congestive heart failure, chronic lung disease, serious neurological disease, and active malignancy [
VTE also recurs frequently. About 30% of patients develop recurrences within the next 10years. The hazard of recurrence varies with the time since the incident event and is highest within the rst 6–12months. However, even 10years after an
3].
5
A. Falanga, MD (*) • V. Milesi Division of Immunohematology and Transfusion Medicine, Thrombosis & Hemostasis Center, Hospital Papa Giovanni XXIII, Piazza OMS, 1, Bergamo 24127, Italy
© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018 A. Crucitti (ed.), Surgical Management of Elderly Patients,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60861-7_5
65