Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / @xirurgi_2025 / @xirurgi_2025 - 641 - файл

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
19 Мб
Скачать
Robotic Surgery Devices in Surgical Specialties
João Pádua Manzano Lydia Masako Ferreira
Editors
Rafael Silva de Araújo
Associate Editor
123
Robotic Surgery Devices in Surgical Specialties
João Pádua Manzano • Lydia Masako Ferreira
Editors
Rafael Silva de Araújo
Associate Editor
Robotic Surgery Devices in Surgical Specialties
Editors
João Pádua Manzano Department of Surgery Universidade Federal de São Paulo São Paulo, Brazil
Lydia Masako Ferreira Plastic Surgery Department Universidade Federal de São Paulo São Paulo, Brazil
ISBN 978-3-031-35101-3 ISBN 978-3-031-35102-0 (eBook)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35102-0
© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are solely and exclusively licensed by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microlms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specic statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors, and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, expressed or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made. The publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional afliations.
This Springer imprint is published by the registered company Springer Nature Switzerland AG The registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland
Preface
https://t.me/medicina_free
In the last few decades, surgical procedures have seen remarkable advancements through disruptive technologies. The introduction of minimally invasive techniques in surgery has revolutionized the way surgical procedures are performed, allowing for faster recovery times, less pain, and fewer complications for patients. The next step in this evolution is robotic-assisted surgery, which is expanding rapidly and has the potential to be the most signicant advance in surgery for generations to come.
The current robotic platform, the Da Vinci system, is the product of an evolution that began with the US Department of Defense’s efforts to provide advanced surgical care to frontline soldiers from remote locations. The system’s enhanced dexterity, based on an anthropomorphic model that mimics the human hand’s range and freedom of movements, has allowed both average and skilled surgeons to push the envelope in the complexity of minimally invasive procedures. The robotic approach has now permeated essentially every specialty in surgery.
The true potential of robotic surgery lies in two new dynamics between patient and surgeon. The master-slave relationship, where the surgeon is remote from the patient and controls a slave patient cart that is attached to the patient, enables telepresence and will have a profound impact on delivering complex care to remote locations from a command center. It will also dramatically facilitate professional education and collaborative surgery. The digital interface, which allows the collection and manipulation of data that can be used for diagnostic or interventional purposes, represents an even greater potential.
Currently, the robotic approach has permeated practically all surgical specialties. This book is the rst comprehensive overview of the role of robotic surgery devices in all surgical specialties. It is intended to give a historical perspective of the evolution and applications of robotic surgery in each surgical specialty. In recognition of the importance of understanding emerging technology and future robotic platforms, this book also provides an overview of the potential impact of this technology on the future of surgery.
Each chapter in this book is written by recognized leaders in their eld, examining specic applications of robotic surgery in a surgical specialty. The authors provide detailed technical aspects of each existing platform and the surgical procedures
v
vi
https://t.me/medicina_free
Preface
performed using this technology, as well as the results of these techniques. The editors appreciate the participation of these expert surgeons in this effort, and we hope that this comprehensive resource will advance the practice of robotic surgery.
São Paulo, Brazil JoaoPaduaManzano São Paulo, Brazil RafaelSilvade Araújo São Paulo, Brazil LydiaMasakoFerreira
Contents
https://t.me/medicina_free
History of Robotic Surgery . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Lydia Masako Ferreira, Rafael Silva de Araújo, and Catherine Maureira Oyharçabal
Robotic Devices in Aesthetic Plastic Surgery . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Marco Aurélio Faria Correa
Features and Knacks of Robotic Keyhole Cardiac Surgery . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
Ryuta Seguchi, Norihiko Ishikawa, and Go Watanabe
Robotic Surgery Devices in Lobectomy for Lung Malignancies
with the da Vinci Xi Surgical System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
Makoto Oda and Rurika Hamanaka
Robotic Devices in Urology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57
Marcio Covas Moschovas, João Pádua Manzano, and Vipul Patel
Robotic Devices in Surgery of the Digestive System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73
Bruno Zilberstein, Danilo Dallago De Marchi, Andrea Vieira Martins, Rodrigo Moises de Almeida Leite, and Gustavo Guimarães
Robotic Devices in Head and Neck Surgery . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 101
Andressa Teruya Ramos and Renan Bezerra Lira Lira
Robotic Devices in Pediatric Surgery . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 115
Adriano Almeida Calado and Daniel G. DaJusta
Robotic Devices in Knee Orthopedic Surgery . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 127
Marco Kawamura Demange and Camila Maftoum Cavalheiro
Robotic Devices in Upper Limb Orthopedic Surgery
and Microsurgery . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 137
Jose Carlos Garcia Jr
vii
viii
https://t.me/medicina_free
Contents
Robotic Devices in Hip Orthopedic Surgery . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 147
Marco Aurelio Silverio Neves, Fabio Zego, and Osvaldo Guilherme Nunes Pires
Robotic Systems in Ophthalmologic Surgery . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 161
Marina Roizenblatt, Ali Ebrahini, Iulian Iordachita, and Peter Louis Gehlbach
Robotic Devices in Gynecology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 175
Renato Moretti-Marques, Mariana Corinti, Vanessa Alvarenga-Bezerra, Luisa Marcella Martins, and Mariano Tamura Vieira Gomes
Robotic Devices in Neurosurgery . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 203
Paulo Porto de Melo
Robotic Microsurgery . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 209
Onuralp Ergun, Ahmet Gudeloglu, and Sijo J. Parekattil
New Platforms in Robotic Surgery . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 225
Gustavo Cardoso Guimarães
Single-Port . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 233
Dorival Duarte Jr., Artur de Oliveira Paludo, Leonardo Martins Caldeira de Deus, Milton Berger, João Pádua Manzano, and André Kives Berger
Future of Robotic Surgery . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 243
Rafael Silva de Araújo, João Pádua Manzano, and Lydia Masako Ferreira
Index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 251
History ofRobotic Surgery
https://t.me/medicina_free
LydiaMasakoFerreira, RafaelSilvade Araújo, andCatherineMaureiraOyharçabal
The rst appearance of species currently described as “robots” refers to the work “Iliad” by Homer, book XVIII, from the fth century . In it, it was found the activity of creating beings made of metal and gold with their own movement designed by the god of metallurgy, Hephaestus, to serve him in his tasks. In the course of history to the present day, the image of these beings has acquired different features, moving between heroes and villains in different scenarios of prosperous futures or fanciful dystopias [1].
Despite the description in the Antiquity period, the rst time that the term “robot” was used comes from the Czech play “Rossum’s Universal Robots,” written in 1920 by Karel Capek. According to the translation of the play in the work Rossum’s Universal Robots (Tchápek, 2010, p.16), it is described that the word robot comes from the Church Slavonic term rob, which means slave, and that as a feminine noun in the Czech spelling robota, it translates to forced labor or strenuous physical labor. Thus, in the theatrical work, the word robota was used to refer to metal beings with an image similar to man and which translates to “servants” whose destiny and function was previously established: to fulll what human beings had not had the ability or intention to perform [2, 3].
It can be seen during the play that the boring activities dedicated to the dozens of replicas allowed human beings more time to dedicate themselves to other intellec­tual activities, to leisure, and to idleness. In the end, Tchápek describes the awaken­ing of the robots’ consciousness in his narrative, which face their dominators with the saying: “The human stage is outdated. A new world has begun! The government of robots!”[3].
L. M. Ferreira (*) · R. S. de Araújo Plastic Surgery Department, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
C. M. Oyharçabal University of Mogi das Cruzes, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023 J. P. Manzano, L. M. Ferreira (eds.), Robotic Surgery Devices in Surgical Specialties, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35102-0_1
1
2
https://t.me/medicina_free
L. M. Ferreira et al.
What at rst was just a science ction dream that brought alternative realities and extraordinary battles in the eld of Literature gradually brought new tools to human daily life, especially with the advancement of technologies and innovations. In the eld of medicine, in the 1980s, there were already specic computer systems that guided certain procedures, such as the case of Robodoc for hip replacement surgeries in orthopedics or the Programmable Universal Machine for Assembly (PUMA) 200 for performing neurosurgical biopsies. During this period, based on a proposal made by the United States Army (USA), the spark was lit for the insertion and idealization of the use of robotic machinery in surgical elds [4, 5].
The main idea of this request was based on the possibility of allowing the arrival of medical aid in military camps of difcult access, changing the previous paradigm of transferring the injured soldier to the nearest hospital and bringing the new concept of taking the operating room to the support unit. In this way, it was hoped to change the precept from “Golden Hour” to “Golden Minute,” allowing for immediate intervention and improving the survival of seriously injured soldiers [5, 6].
The pioneering prototypes depended on previous studies by researchers at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) and Scott Fisher, who developed a screen attached to the face through a helmet to allow a three-dimensional (3D) virtual environment. For the creation of a telepresence device, engineer Dr. Phil Green from the Stanford Research Institute (SRI), a program funded by the US government, Colonel Richard Satava, and other members of the SRI team developed what was called a “telepresence surgery system,” also known as the “SRI system,” consisting of a surgeon’s workstation and a remote surgical unit [7].
This public initiative prototype contained a pair of instrument handlers at the surgeon’s station that transmitted their movements to the remote surgical unit attached to the patient. These gauntlets did not contain an articulating wrist and therefore allowed movement in only four degrees of freedom compared to the seven possible degrees of being performed by the human hand. They were positioned below a mirror in order to give the illusion that the instrument handles in the surgeon’s hand were attached to the tips projected in the image seen on a monitor. As there was a simple video system, this phase required the use of polarized light glasses to create a 3D image [7].
In the remote surgical unit, instruments could be changed through a twist lock mechanism, making it possible to use needles, intestinal forceps, scalpels, and electrocautery. A point that differentiates the SRI system from current ones is the presence of tactile feedback from force sensors in the distal portion of the instruments, which transmitted sensations to the surgeon and prohibited movements from a certain degree of resistance encountered during the intraoperative [7, 8].
Although it was initially designed for use in open surgery, in 1989, Colonel Richard Satava watched the presentation of a videotaped laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed by Dr. Jacques Perrisat at the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES). This milestone made him bring to the SRI team the idea of promoting the transition from the robotic laparotomy system to a laparoscopic model. At the time, Colonel Satava argued that the robotic telepresence system offered a solution to difculties with traditional
Соседние файлы в папке @xirurgi_2025