Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / @xirurgi_2025 / @xirurgi_2025 - 566 - файл

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
24 Мб
Скачать
360
https://t.me/medicina_free
R. A. Saavedra and E. Auyang
Upper GI/Esophagram
UGI is a powerful tool in assessing esophageal and gastric anat­omy. Images can be obtained in upright, oblique, and supine posi­tions and can also dynamically evaluate function by observing contrast ow in real-time and passage of a radiolucent tablet dur­ing a swallow. While the anatomic and functional information that these studies provide in the preoperative evaluation of a hiatal her­nia is valuable, routine use in the postoperative evaluation of asymptomatic patients is not required [1]. However, postoperative contrast studies are still obtained by some providers to evaluate for leak immediately post-procedure or to evaluate the anatomic results [2, 3].
After hiatal hernia repair and fundoplication, contrast imaging should show a smooth, tapered narrowing of the distal esophagus and GEJ with a 2–3 cm wrap seen below the level of the dia­phragm (Fig.26.1) [2, 4, 5]. There should not be any evidence of hernia recurrence or reux. Immediately postoperatively, there may be evidence of swelling near the fundoplication due to tissue edema. However, this swelling should not interfere with passage of radio-opaque material or cause any signicant esophageal dila­tion proximally (Fig. 26.2). When visualized, the leaves of the fundoplication will appear as blind ends surrounding the esopha­gus. The anterior leaf of the fundoplication may not be visualized as it is challenging to reux contrast into this area [4]. Patient positioning should be veried as the fundal wrap defect may form an acute angle created by the plication and the nonsurgical gastric wall when the patient is supine [5]. It is important to know the surgical procedure performed as the type of fundoplication per­formed may alter interpretation of imaged results. For example, a Toupet or Dor fundoplication may be misinterpreted as a dis­rupted fundoplication. If an esophageal lengthening procedure was necessary, the presence of gastric folds within the wrap is expected.
26 Normal Physiology Findings After Hiatal Hernia Repair…
https://t.me/medicina_free
361
Fig. 26.1 Normal UGI showing contrast easily passing through an intact fundoplication into stomach
362
https://t.me/medicina_free
R. A. Saavedra and E. Auyang
Fig. 26.2 Normal UGI from a lateral perspective showing an intact wrap with contrast entering the leaets of the fundoplication
Computed Tomography
CT imaging may be obtained for various reasons in patients post­fundoplication. The patient may be symptomatic from the wrap itself, or the wrap may be incidentally seen during evaluation of another anatomical pathology. Similar to the discussion of UGI, understanding the performed surgical procedure and subsequent expected anatomy is critical to proper interpretation of CT imaging.
26 Normal Physiology Findings After Hiatal Hernia Repair…
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 26.3 CT scan showing leaets of the fundoplication wrapping around the distal esophagus
363
Imaging should clearly show the gastric fundus wrapped around the distal esophagus. Again, the GEJ will lie below the diaphragm with a 2–3 cm wrap surrounding it (Fig. 26.3). No evidence of hernia recurrence should be present. Gaseous disten­sion of the body and fundus of the stomach do not suggest under­lying pathology and should still permit for proper fundoplication evaluation [6]. In the rst several weeks postoperatively, thicken­ing of the gastric mucosa at the fundoplication secondary to edema is expected [6]. If contrast is used, it ought to pass through the fundoplication easily and there should not be signicant esophageal dilation. A slight “whirled” appearance of the fundo­plication is within normal limits [5]. As discussed above, Toupet or Dor fundoplication may again appear as a disrupted fundopli­cation on CT and so reference to the original procedure should be made when possible.
364
https://t.me/medicina_free
R. A. Saavedra and E. Auyang
Manometry andMotility
There is extensive literature regarding evaluation of the physiol­ogy of the esophagus in the preoperative and postoperative set­tings. Esophageal manometry allows for assessment of global motility as well as the subcomponents of the esophagus. It is not typically conducted on a routine basis after fundoplication as its association with symptomatology has been controversial. The normal pressures produced by the esophagus in the asymptom­atic patient can vary widely [7]. Hiatal hernia repair and fundo­plication do not affect the physiologic function of the esophagus and are not associated with motility changes in the esophageal body [8]. Therefore, peristaltic function is expected to be unchanged due to a repair and fundoplication. The lower esoph­ageal sphincter (LES) may see some change in pressures. Patients’ LES resting pressures tend to be lower preoperatively, with mean pressure ranging from 6 to 16 mmHg [810]. Postoperatively, there is a statistically signicant increase in mean pressures, with a range of 17–24 mmHg [810]. These changes are expected and are not associated with symptomatol­ogy such as dysphagia.
pH Testing
pH testing is typically performed using catheter-based pH moni­toring or the portable BRAVO system. This testing evaluates for reux and can be clinically correlated to the patient’s symptoms. Similar to manometry, pH testing is not routinely done in asymp­tomatic patients postoperatively. However, pH testing has been used for objective conrmation of surgical success in postopera­tive patients via examination of time with pH <4.0 and DeMeester score. Preoperatively, patients have an increased time with a pH <4.0 in the esophagus compared to normal and a DeMeester score>14.7 which indicates abnormally high amount of reux [9, 10]. The anatomical restoration of the LES provided by fun-
26 Normal Physiology Findings After Hiatal Hernia Repair…
https://t.me/medicina_free
doplication improves both of these metrics. Postoperatively, patients should experience a normalization of DeMeester score to <14.7 and the time of pH <4.0 decreases to 5.5% of the time on 24-hr evaluation [9, 10]. These results have also been seen in BRAVO pH analysis. This analysis reiterates decreased reux episodes, decreased percentage time with pH<4.0, and signi­cant improvements in DeMeester score to as low as 1.25in post­operative patients [11]. Those who undergo giant hiatal hernia repair in addition to fundoplication will show the same normal­ization of DeMeester score and percentage time pH<4.0, though the objective data may show slightly more episodes of reux compared to fundoplication alone [12]. These data do not corre­late with any clinically signicant change in patient symptom­atology and is still within normal limits of objective ndings. If patients have recurrent or atypical symptoms postoperative, the pH study can be used as a test to rule out GERD as an etiology especially when symptoms do not correlate with objective epi­sodes of reux.
365
Endoscopy
Endoscopy is standard in the evaluation of upper gastrointestinal tract pathology, including hiatal hernia evaluation in the preopera­tive setting. It can also be utilized postoperatively to evaluate the integrity of hiatal hernia repair and fundoplication. It is important to understand endoscopic ndings in both settings. The Hill clas­sication is a grading system that has been utilized for evaluation of hiatal hernias. Its principles can be used in both pre- and post­operative settings to evaluate the gastroesophageal ap [13]. Hill classication grades the valve integrity from I-IV.Grade I shows a prominent fold of gastric tissue directly against the endoscope. As the grades increase, the evidence of the gastroesophageal ap is less apparent and the tissue no longer approximates the scope. Grade IV will show an open esophageal lumen and an obvious hiatal hernia. Appropriate surgical repair should reapproximate
366
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 26.4 Endoscopy showing an intact Nissen fundoplication
R. A. Saavedra and E. Auyang
the normal anatomy; however, it is important to reiterate that anat­omy visualized on endoscopic evaluation is dependent on the spe­cic repair used.
For example, Nissen fundoplication will lead to creation of a nipple valve on endoscopy with a deep posterior and shallow anterior groove (Fig.26.4) [14]. The valve will have an “omega” shape to it and should closely approximate the endoscope. Similarly, a Toupet fundoplication will have a ap valve in an “omega” shape and may look identical to that of a Nissen fundo­plication (Fig.26.5) [14]. Lastly, a Dor fundoplication will have a ap valve that is wide and “S”-shaped and should moderately approximate the scope [14]. Regardless of the operative technique used, the gastroesophageal ap should closely approximate the scope, thus resembling a Hill grade I without evidence of a recur­rent hiatal hernia.
26 Normal Physiology Findings After Hiatal Hernia Repair…
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 26.5 Endoscopy showing an intact Toupet fundoplication
Gastric Emptying
367
Gastric emptying is usually measured over 2–4h using Tc-99 sul­fur colloid foods. Normal values are 10% emptying at 1hr., 65% at 2h, and 90% at 4h [15]. Delayed gastric emptying is uncom­mon after surgery; however, it is more commonly reported in cases after very large hiatal hernia repairs or redo paraesophageal hernia repairs [16, 17], likely from gastric atony and not true gas­troparesis. Hiatal hernia repair with fundoplication should not result in worsened gastric emptying. The vagus nerve should be left intact during the operation. Thus, vagal nerve function and gastric emptying should be preserved. The restoration of a more normal anatomy can potentially even improve gastric emptying in
368
https://t.me/medicina_free
those with preoperative delayed gastric emptying [18, 19]. Overall, gastric emptying should be expected to have normal results postoperatively in the absence of preexisting gastroparesis.
R. A. Saavedra and E. Auyang
EndoFLIP
Endoluminal functional luminal-imaging probe (EndoFLIP) is a newer technology that can be used to assess GEJ function, mea­suring its diameter, area, pressure, and distensibility. EndoFLIP has been used intraoperatively to tailor fundoplications, and its use has shown that a drop in the distensibility index (DI) is associ­ated with nonrecurrence of symptoms in short-term follow-up [20]. Fundoplication will generally reduce the DI as the interven­tion is decreasing the cross-sectional area of the GEJ.The type of fundoplication used may vary the degree of DI reduction [21]. Exact numeric values identifying a functional fundoplication are still lacking due to the recent introduction of this device. One study has suggested that minimal diameter changes of <0.15mm and cross-sectional area changes of <1.5mm^2 may lead to recur­rence of symptoms [22]. EndoFLIP may prove a valuable tool in determining the adequacy of fundoplication and tailoring repairs for patients. However, further data are needed to clarify what measurements or changes can be veried as normal for the patient.
Discussion
Hiatal hernia repair with fundoplication should recreate normal anatomy, and thus restore the physiologic function of the GEJ. When performing postoperative testing, reference to the original operation helps delineate what ndings are expected,
26 Normal Physiology Findings After Hiatal Hernia Repair…
https://t.me/medicina_free
especially with image-directed studies looking at the anatomy. With physiologic testing, such as manometry, pH testing, and gas­tric emptying, ndings should be similar to those of an asymp­tomatic patient. Normal physiologic ndings suggest that reoperation will not benet the patient. Signicant deviation from ndings discussed here should be viewed as abnormal. However, abnormal ndings alone do not necessarily indicate a need for operative repair. Correlation to symptoms needs to be established.
369
Editors’ Note
Reux/Dysphagia After aSleeve
Соседние файлы в папке @xirurgi_2025