Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / @xirurgi_2025 / @xirurgi_2025 - 539 - файл

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
26 Мб
Скачать
32 Use ofPorcine Urinary Bladder Matrix (UBM-ECM) intheHead andNeck Region
https://t.me/medicina_free
367
defect must be removed from the exposed wound regions before stable healing occurs.
ECM wound device therapy usually needs a secondary dressing that can be as simple as a head wrap or cap, silicone sheets, or sutured dressings. We have found shaving a 3–4cm rim of hair around scalp wound helps with both keep­ing the wound clean and allowing for placement of a polyurethane sheet dressing which allows for retention of sufcient moisture to facilitate the constructive remodeling healing response. Alternatively, one can keep the device hydrated with a hydrogel with a secondary Telfa-type overlying dressing. One needs to be sure that the device has adequate hydration and should it appear too dry or healing is slowed, a trial of placing increased moisture should be tried before a further treatment.
Over the last 6years, we have been using the UBM-ECM device; we have evolved in our thinking and utilization of the wound device. Initially we began using it much like other topical wound therapies only to appreciate that larger amounts of the device could be successfully applied at one setting, so we moved to placing multiple device formulations at the time of the initial operative wound bed preparation. The sub­sequent care was simplied as it only required placement of small amounts of hydrogel on top of a secondary dressing which caused little patient pain and discomfort. Suturing the device into the wound either directly or with a secondary dressing sutured at the margins has also facili­tated postoperative care. The wound is then observed until it is healed or until the wound has lled in to a point a simple skin graft is possible.
UBM-ECM wound device healing occurs via a process referred to as constructive remodeling which occurs when the wound device is broken down at the wound bed surface and replaced with the host’s native tissue(s). This newly formed tis­sue is typically a very close replica of the missing tissue, but as it is not identical to the missing tis­sue, it is improper to refer to this healing process as regeneration. Newly generated peptide frag­ments referred to as matricryptins, matrikinins, or matricryptic peptides which form as the host
cells degrade the ECM device exert potent bioac­tivity with their newly exposed adhesions sites [27, 28]. These shorter fragments often have bio­logic responses that are distinct from, and often more potent than, those of the native parent mol­ecule. It is the combination of all of these newly formed peptides which regulate the wide variety of injury and healing processes observed includ­ing angiogenesis, anti-angiogenesis, migration, differentiation, adhesion, as well as the associ­ated antimicrobial activity that yields the less scarred constructive remodeling healing observed. A recent publication [29] is the most complete characterization of the composition of the EBM-ECM wound device and highlights the enhanced M-2 macrophage healing response noted in previous studies [30-32]. Over 500 pro­teins were identied via mass spectrometry, with 78% identied as MatriSome and MatriSome­associated proteins (Fig.32.1). Sadtler etal. [29] found that within the MatriSome category of pro­teins (77% of total), 98% were collagens (espe­cially Types 1, 3–6, and 14), 1% ECM glycoproteins, and 1% proteoglycans. Within the MatriSome-associated fraction (1% of total), 55% were ECM regulators, 44% were ECM afl­iated proteins, and 2% were secreted factors. The most abundant non-MatriSome proteins included actin, desmin, and hemoglobin. Additionally, adaptive immune T and B cells were also detected suggesting a role for antigen specicity to the remodeling response. What is clear is that a deeper understanding of all of the ECM compo­nents and their interactions with the body’s immune system is needed to develop best prac­tice UBM-ECM device use.
Clinically we have noted the normal inam­matory healing response is also greatly reduced as patients experience less swelling, scarring, and pain in the treated regions both early on and in the long term. We have not observed the restora­tion of skin appendages; however the UBM-ECM wound device provides a healthy healed wound which is amenable to later hair follicle grafting procedures.
Mohs surgical management of skin cancers of the head and neck has become more common-
368
https://t.me/medicina_free
B. A. Kraemer and A. G. Rowe
ab
cd
Fig. 32.1 UBM-ECM Formulations. (a) The freeze- dried formulation of the UBM-ECM is available as a dual­layer lyophilized sheet wound device (Cytal Matrix) or ground into a powder (MicroMatrix ing powder). (b) Scanning electron micrograph of the lyophilized (freeze-dried) sheet shows the natural ECM matrix structure after complete decellularization. Note both the overlying intact smooth surface of the intact basement membrane layer and the honeycombed ECM
®
Burn
®
, overly-
place, and with micrographic margin control, the use of the ECM wound devices can have great utility. The use of an ECM wound device at the time that clear margins are obtained can help limit the scarring. Many Mohs surgeons now also perform their own wound closures and refer only the larger more complex patients for treatment. Forehead aps are a mainstay of treatment of large nasal defects. Patient acceptance of the pro­cedure can be an obstacle for the medically ill, the anticoagulated patient, and the younger patient who doesn’t want to have a two-stage, let
matrix structure which optimally presents the ECM con­stituents for host tissue interaction. (c) The thicker fenes­trated vacuum-pressed sheet formulation marketed as a 3- or 6-layer Cytal micrograph of the vacuum-pressed 6-layer sheet demon­strating the denser, compressed ECM matrix. These for­mulations persist in the wound bed the longest with the 6-layer device lasting the longest
®
Wound Matrix. (d) Scanning electron
alone a three-stage, ap reconstructive proce­dure. We have also used the UBM-ECM device to manage a large nasal sidewall defect down to a smaller-sized alar rim defect which was amena­ble to a free ear cartilage-skin graft. A close working relationship with dermatologists is addi­tionally useful for co-managing unusual inam­matory and healing issues of the scalp. We have treated two cases of pustular dermatosis with UBM-ECM which optimally responded to tha­lidomide treatment in one case and the second one which responded to FK-506.
32 Use ofPorcine Urinary Bladder Matrix (UBM-ECM) intheHead andNeck Region
https://t.me/medicina_free
369
Acute trauma degloving-type wounds can lead to large surface wound. These wounds typi­cally heal well, but at the time of acute injury, patients want to be sure that all measures are taken to minimize scarring. For crush nasal or nasoorbitalethmoidal injuries, we have used the device in a single or multi-layer formulation depending upon the degree of injury for internal nasal lining and preservation of the nasal cavity. The high collagen content of the device also acts as a hemostatic agent to control the inevitable bleeding.
UBM-ECM wound devices are clinically available in three formulations, and an under­standing of the performance characteristics of each formulation allows for the enhanced healing possible:
1. The MicroMatrix® powder (Fig. 32.1) pro-
duces a more rapid, robust healing response
as the small particle size allows for rapid
breakdown. It can be applied as a direct pow-
der or mixed with saline to create a thick
slurry for injection. It can be used serially
with alternate day treatments or in large vol-
umes in a single placement. We have found it
useful to improved healing (“take”) of skin
grafts in wounds beds that are less than ideal
or in patients who are poor surgical
candidates.
2. The lyophilized sheet formulation (Fig.32.1)
is the device formulation prior to it being
ground into powder and has a more sustained
response over the period of 1week or more as
a single sheet or longer if it is “packed” into a
wound.
3. The vacuum-pressed sheets (Fig. 32.1) are
available in 3-layer and 6-layer sheet formula-
tions as Cytal
®
Surgical Sheets. There is also an 8-layer sheet available as Gentrix® Surgical Thick sheets which is indicated for tissue rein­forcement such as in hernia repair. We have found the suture-holding capacity of the vac­uum-pressed sheets useful to secure the skin margins of an open wound, reduce skin clo­sure tension as well as help to hold and retain
other formulations of the UBM-ECM device placed deeper in the wound.
One of the greatest present limitations to UBM-ECM use comes from insurance compa­nies classifying these devices as experimental and denying coverage. Also, there is limited reimbursement for outpatient use, so all of the cases in this series had the device placed in the operating room. Both of these limitations should be solved in the near future which will allow for more timely and rapid healing with use of these devices. More recently we have had success appealing the denial decisions after discussing the case with a medical direc­tor who has knowledge of surgery and wound care.
We found most patient had healed wounds with good outcomes with the following notes:
1. Scalp and forehead wounds tend to heal
slower and often required several applications
of the device to yield a wound able to be skin
grafted or go on to complete closure.
2. Patients that initially had more aggressive
bone debridement (as discussed) showed
improved healing with fewer treatments.
3. The slowest healing occurred with therapeutic
prior scalp radiation for cancer treatment and
with pustular dermatosis of the scalp (until
treated with tacrolimus– Case 10).
4. The wound device use in improving scar revi-
sions holds great promise.
5. Contracted facial scars did not dramatically
improve with placement of the device under
the intact skin.
6. More research is needed to determine optimal
use of the UBM-ECM wound device.
32.4 Clinical Cases
These clinical cases represent an evolution of our clinical experience trying to obtain optimal heal­ing with the various formulations of the UBM-
370
https://t.me/medicina_free
B. A. Kraemer and A. G. Rowe
ECM wound device. We found that placing larger amounts of the device at the operative setting proved to be both effective and saved patients’ time and discomfort at subsequent follow- up vis­its. Powder was used more often in treating chronic wounds to stimulate a robust healing response in a chronic wound bed. Common to the management of all of these wounds is securing the device into the wound bed and the need for
the wound devices to be kept moist with serial application of hydrogels and/or the use of mois­ture retentive dressings such as a polyurethane sheet dressing. Of particular note is the appear­ance of the lighter pink salmon-colored UBM­ECM-stimulated granulation tissue which forms (Figs.32.2d, 32.3g, 32.8e, 32.9g, and 32.9h) and the formation of visible blood vessels in the newly formed tissue (Fig. 32.2j).
ab
cd
Fig. 32.2 A 65-year-old male having had a wide resec­tion of stage 2 nodular melanoma of his left temple closed with a full-thickness skin graft, subsequent radiation ther­apy followed by a methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection leading to this exposed bone open wound for 2 years. (a) Initial appearance of the left temple wound. (b) Wound after debridement of the outer necrotic bone. (c) Wound after placement of MicroMatrix and Cytal tially close wound and retain the wound device in the wound bed. (d) Wound 3 weeks postoperative. (e) Wound
®
Burn Matrix and Prolene sutures placed to par-
®
powder
7 weeks postoperative at time of repeat full-thickness skin graft. (f) Wound 2 weeks post-grafting. (g) Wound 6 weeks post-grafting. (h) Twelve weeks post-grafting, additional MicroMatrix weeks post-grafting nearly healed. (j) Five months later, debrided and additional MicroMatrix (k) Two months later, and after additional MicroMatrix powder application the wound then heals—note the appearance of new blood vessels in the wound bed. (l) One year later. (m) Two years later
®
powder applied. (i) Fourteen
®
powder applied.
®
32 Use ofPorcine Urinary Bladder Matrix (UBM-ECM) intheHead andNeck Region
https://t.me/medicina_free
ef
gh
371
ij
Fig. 32.2 (continued)
372
https://t.me/medicina_free
B. A. Kraemer and A. G. Rowe
k
m
l
Fig. 32.2 (continued)
32.4.1 Forehead andScalp
Initial management of this patient required removal of the obviously necrotic exposed bone prior to the placement of both MicroMatrix® powder and Cytal® Burn Matrix (Fig.32.2). The device was retained in the wound with Prolene sutures used to partially close the circular as well as retain the wound device in the wound bed like a mesh. The healing was slow with several small
foci of bone which failed to promote healing and needed removal. Of particular interest was the formation of visible new blood vessels which formed during the healing process. Integra® was not employed in this case due to the risk of infec­tion in this chronic wound.
This patient who sustained a nearly fatal stroke had a poorly treated, infected, full­thickness skull defect with exposed, injured dura (Fig.32.3). The dura repair device, while classi-
cd
32 Use ofPorcine Urinary Bladder Matrix (UBM-ECM) intheHead andNeck Region
https://t.me/medicina_free
373
a
b
ef
Fig. 32.3
A 42-year-old female with a scalp wound fol­lowing a decompressive craniotomy for a major right middle cerebral artery stroke. (a, b) Initial wound appear­ance showing exposed central cranial bone edge and poor wound care. (c, d) CT scan showing the calvarial bone defect and the Durepair
®
dura regeneration matrix (bright wavy line in d) used for dural closure/reinforcement. (e) Debrided wound with bone debrided back to bleeding and the dural edge present just above the hooks—no CSF leak
was noted. (f) After placement of MicroMatrix and Cytal
®
6-layer vacuum pressed sheet placement. (g) Four weeks postoperative showing residual ECM device still present in the wound. (h) Ten weeks postoperative with a region of bone still exposed. (i) One month after bone debridement and placement of additional MicroMatrix
®
powder. (j) Seven months later (11 months after initial procedure). (k) After neurosurgery replaced bone ap 7 months later
®
powder
374
gh
https://t.me/medicina_free
B. A. Kraemer and A. G. Rowe
i
j
k
Fig. 32.3 (continued)
ed as an ECM device, is processed for strength and durability which enhances the tensile dural repair but alters the native device molecules, so it
problems and possible dermatology consulta­tion for unexpected complications with normal expected healing.
lacks the enhanced ECM wound healing response found with the UBM-ECM. Both the MicroMatrix® powder and Cytal® 6-layer Surgical Matrix was placed and closed into the wound with a small open gap treated with daily hydrogel. The initial debridement of the outer calvarial bone was inadequate and required addi­tional debridement and placement of the UBM­ECM for nal closure.
This chronic exposed skull wound which responded to debridement, ECM treatment, and subsequent skin grafting failed to completely heal until being treated with topical tacrolimus (Fig. 32.4). A large volume of MicroMatrix powder is placed on top of several layers of the Cytal® Burn Matrix which was then secured at the periphery with staples. Once the granula­tion bed developed to a point it was felt the wound bed would support a skin graft, a graft was placed. Medically complex patients such as this elderly patient with rheumatoid arthritis require maximal medical management of all
32.4.2 Nasal Reconstruction
The Cytal® Burn Matrix treatment of a degloving nasal tissue laceration and externally, was done in an attempt to limit the potential scarring of the nose (Fig.32.5). Powder was not used due to the acute nature of the injury and the desired UBM­ECM healing response was desired for the rst 2 weeks. The UBM-ECM device was employed due to the severity of the wounds and to avoid potential secondary internal nasal scarring which
®
is most difcult to treat once it develops. This patient reported normal breathing and near normal sensation of the degloved nasal skin. Of particular interest is the healing of the non-treated brow region sites which developed some contracted healing (which might best have been treated with a wound sheet underlay these aps also).
The UBM-ECM device was used in an attempt
to minimize forehead ap pedicle inammation
32 Use ofPorcine Urinary Bladder Matrix (UBM-ECM) intheHead andNeck Region
https://t.me/medicina_free
375
and distal ap swelling, thus allowing for a two­stage instead of a standard three-stage forehead ap nasal reconstruction (Fig. 32.6). We have also successfully used this in one additional
patient. A single device formulation was used due to the acute nature of the surgery and desire for 2–3weeks of desired activity. Figure32.6c, d demonstrates the reduction of inammation of a
ab
cd
Fig. 32.4
scalp wound and exposed bone following Mohs surgical resection of a squamous cell cancer. This wound has been present for over 4 years, and she has had severe rheuma­toid arthritis treated for over 30 years. (a, b) Initial wound appearance. (c) After necrotic bone debridement and placement of 200 mg MicroMatrix Placement of a 7× 10 cm Cytal
An 82-year-old female with an open vertex
®
®
powder. (d)
Burn Matrix sheet. (e)
Four weeks later at time of full-thickness skin graft to the
4.5×5cm wound. (f) Skin graft 1 week later. (g) Four weeks post-grafting. Note the peri-graft inammation treated with silver nitrate. (h) Eight weeks post-grafting. (i) After continued poor healing she was diagnosed with pustular dermatosis that responded to topical tacrolimus treatment. (j) Wound remains healed 4 months later
376
https://t.me/medicina_free
B. A. Kraemer and A. G. Rowe
ef
gh
i
Fig. 32.4 (continued)
j