Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / @xirurgi_2025 / @xirurgi_2025 - 539 - файл

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
26 Мб
Скачать
166
C. I. Günter and H.-G. Machens
https://t.me/medicina_free
and pro-regenerative effects of EPO have been published by Brines etal. [11] and by Arcasoy [9] in 2008.
16.3 EPO Receptors
The different effects of EPO within the different organ systems (erythropoiesis, versus anti­inammatory and pro-regenerative effects) can be explained by a different afnity for the indi­vidual receptor types and receptor subtypes [12]. The tissue-protective properties are mediated by the EPO hetero-receptor, whose afnity for EPO is lower than that of the EPOR2 receptor, which mediates the erythropoietic effect of EPO.The EPO hetero-receptor is usually not detectable in healthy tissue, but has been described post­traumatically [11]. Among other things, this could explain why EPO is only pro-regenerative and pro-proliferative after trauma [5]. As the proof of the EPO hetero-receptor has not yet been achieved beyond doubt, this approach is still controversial.
A major problem in the study of the non­hematopoietic effects of EPO is that the previous antibodies to the EPO hetero receptor are in all likelihood non-specic. It turned out that the antibodies used also bind to other cytokine recep­tors, which makes it difcult to interpret the results [13, 14]. It is therefore particularly impor­tant in the future to re-evaluate the present results with new, highly specic antibodies that are being intensively worked on. Ultimately, only with the help of a specic antibody it can be clari­ed whether a separate EPO hetero receptor exists and in which molecular signaling pathways it plays a role.
16.4 Adverse EPO Eects
In addition to the desired effects of EPO, unde­sirable effects are also described [3]. Three of these are known only for longer-term EPO ther­apy: increased risk of thrombosis [15, 16], anti­body formation [17] against rhEPO, and an increase in blood pressure [18, 19]. Regarding
the thrombophilia caused by EPO, however, the group around Corwin has shown that in patients with adequate weight-adapted thrombosis pro­phylaxis using low-molecular-weight heparin, the thrombosis tendency is not greater under EPO therapy than in the control group without EPO administration [20].
The blood pressure increase problem has so far only been described in patients who had pre­viously exhibited blood pressure abnormalities. Here, an acceptable risk minimization should be feasible through careful evaluation and patient selection. An unprecedented problem is the treatment of tumor anemias with EPO.In prin­ciple, EPO is approved for the treatment of tumor anemia. In the meantime, however, numer­ous studies have shown that EPO therapy has a negative effect on patients’ survival time [19
21]. The discussion of whether this is due solely
to the optimized oxygenation rates after anemia correction or to the pro-angiogenic and anti­apoptotic or the pro-thrombotic effects of EPO, has not yet been completed. However, a direct, active oncogenic effect of EPO has not yet been demonstrated [21, 22].
16.5 EPO inSeverely Burned
Patients
As early as 1972, the concentration of autologous EPO in patient blood was investigated in anemia after thermal trauma [23]. In particular, it was noticeable that patients with burns below 30% TBSA generally had normal EPO blood values on the one hand and were not subject to transfu­sion on the other hand. In contrast, patients with burns above 30% TBSA were usually found to have markedly low EPO levels in the blood. In addition, these patients were usually anemic. It is also striking that patients with pronounced bacte­rial wound infections had even lower EPO and pronounced anemia values, and therefore all patients in these two groups were subject to transfusion [23].
In the 80s and 90s followed a series of publi­cations, the aim of which was the anemia correction in severely burned patients by EPO
16 Erythropoietin: AnInnovative Therapeutic Approach inThermal Trauma
https://t.me/medicina_free
167
application. In none of the publications a signi­cant reduction of the number of transfused blood products required could be detected; an effective increase in erythropoiesis, which had been intended, could also not be demonstrated. Effects on wound healing are not described, as they were not the subject of the investigations [24, 25].
It is now known that erythropoiesis is not likely to be increased by EPO administration in critically ill patients. In a mouse model, it could be shown that after an adequate thermal trauma a general depletion of the bone marrow occurs whereby the erythropoiesis and the lymphpectoris are more affected than the myelopoiesis. This depletion is refractory to EPO therapy [26]. However, this fun­damentally undesirable effect could be a benet for patients injured by serious burns, as this would make the feared complications of excessive eryth­ropoiesis very unlikely, and the pro-regenerative effects of EPO could be exploited.
16.6 Pro-Regenerative EPO
Eects in Burn Injury Animal Models
mals. The blood count changes were not statisti­cally signicant, but on day 14, there was a slight increase in erythrocyte and reticulocyte counts in the animals treated with EPO.
After standardized water vapor scalding, the effect of topically applied EPO was investigated in a mouse model. It showed that the deep dermal scalding in the treated with EPO hydrogel ani­mals healed much faster, the re-epithelialization was completed earlier. Increased epithelial pro­liferation, faster formation, and maturation of the extracellular matrix, as well as marked angiogen­esis induction and consequent higher capillary densities were also demonstrated with high CD31, VEGF, and eNOS levels [28]. In another work, the combined presence of EPOR and the EPO hetero receptor could be detected in both healthy and scalded mouse skin. In the healthy skin, a clear reduction of the EPOR expression after EPO application could be detected, in the thermally injured not, here the expression rate remains high. Likewise, a faster and higher­quality wound healing (dermis /epidermis papil­lae, maturity of the extracellular matrix) could be demonstrated by EPO application [29].
In 2006, Galleano [26] published the rst work investigating the pro-regenerative effects of rhEPO after thermal trauma in the mouse model [27]. Three groups were formed: Verum group: rhEPO 400 IU/kgBW/d for 14 days, placebo group: distilled water, control group: they were previously passively immunized against rhEPO and given rhEPO 400 IU/kg/d for 14 days. Signicantly faster wound closure was associated with faster re-epithelialization in the verum group compared to the other two groups. Wound healing in the immunized group (control) was again sig­nicantly delayed compared to the placebo group (distilled water). In the respective comparison, the verum group showed signicantly better epithe­lial proliferation, a considerably more mature extracellular matrix and pronounced angiogenesis [27]. This was demonstrated in particular by the higher microvascular density in the histological sections, which also had a corresponding increased CD31 expression, as well as increased VEGF and NO values in the samples of these ani-
16.7 Experiences inLow-Grade
and Severely Burned Patients
A pilot study for topical use was performed on 11 low-grade burned patients. In this project, EPO­hydrogel was applied locally to split skin donor sites or placebo hydrogel was used in the con­trols. A faster healing of the split skin donor sites in the verum group could be observed. For exam­ple, complete healing of the split skin donor sites treated with EPO hydrogel was observed after 7days in 85% of patients [30]. Further healing attempts with topically applied EPO were carried out in pediatric scalding injuries. Complete heal­ing of the affected areas within 10 days was observed in mixed 2a–2b scalding injuries.
To translationally review the promising results, hoping for a possible improvemend of wound healing in severely burned patients, a nationwide multi-center study funded by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research was
168
https://t.me/medicina_free
C. I. Günter and H.-G. Machens
being carried out with systemically administered low-dose EPO (EPO in Burns, EuraCT Number: 2006-002886-38, Protocol Number: 0506, ISRCT Number: ISRCTN95777824) [31]. The objective of the original trial “EPO in Burns” was to demonstrate faster wound healing through the pro-regenerative and cytoprotective effects of systemic applied, low-dose recombinant EPO in thermally injured adult patients. Unfortunately, the results of “EPO in Burns” regarding the reep­ithelialization of the study wound did not show a conclusive result. A potential advantage in reach­ing the 100% re-epithelialization could be seen in the EPO group within the rst ten days. Thereafter this trend changed into the contrary. Regarding results of several secondary endpoints, such as ABSI Score results the EPO group showed much better values and therefore a more positive prog­nosis, than the control group. ICH-GCP conform clinical trials are needed to investigate this nd­ings more thorrowly [1, 2].
16.8 EPO Treatment forPrevention ofSecondary Burn Progression
Further interesting reports on EPO effects in ther­mal trauma relate to the possibility that a “low­dose” EPO application can prevent the secondary burn progression of wounds within the rst few minutes to a maximum of hours after trauma. In the animal model (rat), intraperitoneal administration of low dose EPO signicantly reduced secondary burn progression within 45 min of standardized trauma. In the following days, the wounds also healed signicantly faster. This promising approach is worth pursuing and, given sufcient positive data, performing ICH-GCP- compliant clinical trials.
16.9 EPO inSecondary Reconstruction
EPO may also play a role in secondary, recon­structive operations in patients with severe burn injuries, especially in the free microvascular tis­sue transfer. Based on the assumption that EPO could be tissue-protective in ischemic damage.
The investigation required experimental aps, which are designed to develop a zone of persis­tent ischemia with subsequent necrosis.
As early as 2003, Rezaeian etal. [ the rst paper dealing with the use of EPO to improve ap survival in randomly perfused aps in the rat model. On the one hand, the ap survival was investigated, on the other hand possible EPO­induced undesired side effects, such as hematocrit and blood pressure increase, were evaluated. Short-term low-dose and high-dose EPO was associated with statistically signicantly improved ap survival [ increase in hematocrit and blood pressure could only be detected in animals that had received high­dose EPO for three weeks. This signicant increase correlated with a statistically worse ap survival.
Harder etal. [33] developed a mouse model that integrates a randomly perfused, laterally peduncu­lated musculocutaneous ap into a dorsal skin chamber. Untreated, this ap developed partial necrosis of approximately 50% due to persistent ischemia. Using intravital uorescence micros­copy, it is possible to repeatedly examine both mor­phological and dynamic changes in the tissue and vasculature of the ap at the same localization in the chamber window [33, 34]. A rst study exam­ined the efcacy of recombinant human EPO rst detected in two different dosages 24h prior to ap elevation, before induction of ischemic stress and following, repeated over 4days. The administra­tion of rhEPO showed signicant, dose-dependent anti-inammatory (i.e., decreased leukocyte-endo­thelial interaction, impaired cell apoptosis), and pro-angiogenic effect (i.e., microvascular neovas­cularization). The lower dose resulted in signi­cantly improved ap survival compared to the untreated animals, whereas the ten-fold higher dose only marginally improved ap survival. Administration of rhEPO maintained perfusion in the capillaries of critically perfused ap areas. The signicant increase in hematocrit, which could only be detected in the high-dose EPO group start­ing on the fourth day after rst administration, led to a signicant worsening of the ow properties in the ap, and thus poorer survival despite rapid and strong abolition of the EPO-induced anti-amma­tory effect characterized by a decrease in cell apop­tosis and leukocyte-endothelial interaction [33].
32]. A statistically signicant
32] published
16 Erythropoietin: AnInnovative Therapeutic Approach inThermal Trauma
https://t.me/medicina_free
169
Having demonstrated that EPO is dose­dependently protective of critically perfused ap tissue, Contaldo et al. [35] investigated in the same mouse model the optimal time of EPO administration for ap elevation, the induction of persistent ap ischemia. For this purpose, low­dose EPO was administered over a period of 48h either before (preconditioning) or after (post-con­ditioning) the ap elevation. In a third group, the mice received EPO overlapping both 30 min before and after ap elevation and 24h (periop­erative treatment) after ap elevation. Both pre­conditioning and perioperative treatment resulted in a signicant improvement in ap survival as a result of maintaining capillary perfusion in the critically perfused portion of the ap. This, in turn, results from a very early EPO- mediated up­regulation of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) [34], which leads to dilatation of the affer­ent ap vessels. If EPO is administered only after ischemia induction (post-conditioning), this iNOS-mediated maintenance of ap perfusion cannot be induced in a timely manner. In addition, a VEGF-mediated angiogenic reaction associated with de novo formation of functional capillaries was demonstrated [34, 35].
In another work, Contaldo etal. [36] also dem­onstrated in a murine model that persistent vaso­dilations, and thus improved ap survival after perioperative EPO administration, are not only mediated by iNOS, but also due to more than ve days of prolonged up-regulation of endothelial NOS (eNOS). In this work, it was also investi­gated whether EPO-induced and VEGF-mediated angiogenesis is indeed involved in improved ap survival. The co-administration of rhEPO and bevacizumab, i.a., VEGF receptor inhibitor acting as an angiogenesis inhibitor led to a failure of the EPO-induced angiogenic response. Interestingly, there was no change in ap survival after EPO alone. The authors concluded that EPO-mediated angiogenesis is not involved in ap survival under these modes of administration. This is probably because of the time delay, as the newly formed capillaries are functional only vedays after ap elevation. This period is beyond the ischemia tol­erance of the tissue or the demarcation of necrosis [36]. In analogy to microvascular ap scans, Contaldo and coworkers investigated the efcacy
of EPO on musculocutaneous tissue undergoing a 3-h ischemic phase, followed by reperfusion. High-dose EPO were systemically administered either 1 or 24h before ischemia [37]. The animals treated with EPO showed an increased expression of both the EPO receptors in skin and muscle tis­sue, as well as the NOS.These aps and the ani­mals showed less reperfusion injury than untreated animals, resulting in maintenance of capillary perfusion, decreased hyperpermeability of the vessels, and less inammatory response [37].
Lindenblatt etal. [38] investigated NO-mediated tissue protection after systemic EPO administra­tion on a collateralized island ap on the hamster. For this purpose, rhEPO alone or rhEPO was administered together with a non-specic NO-blocker L-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME). The rhEPO application led to a sig­nicant improvement of the ap perfusion, as well as to a weakening of the inammatory reaction and the apoptosis rate. As the co-administration of rhEPO and L-NAME led to a complete abolition of tissue protection, the authors concluded that the protective effect is primarily mediated via NO [39]. An implementation of the ndings obtained in the clinic would be very desirable, in particular the use of non- hematocrit- effective EPO dosages or the short- term use of higher EPO dosages before they become hematocrit effective to a prob­lematic extent. Here, the local EPO application, possibly also high-dose or alternatively the use of modied non-erythropoietic EPO molecules is of particular importance [40].
16.10 Summary andConclusions
The results of the presented, animal experimen­tal investigations on thermal injuries are promis­ing. Unfortunately ICH-GCP compliant clinical trials for EPO as a therapeutic agent to optimize wound healing could not show positive results. This so called “EPO-Paradox” was discribed before by Steppich [3]. In the animal model, damage to the ap caused by acute persistent ischemia, as well as ischemia/reperfusion injury, can be reduced by EPO application. This shows both a time dependence with regard to ap eleva­tion (ischemia induction), as well as a dose
170
https://t.me/medicina_free
C. I. Günter and H.-G. Machens
a
b
Fig. 16.1 (a) Scalding injury, 4 days after injury (2a°to 3°) First Treatment with EPO Hydrogel. (b) Result after 4x EPO Hydrogel Treatements
dependency of EPO. A signicant increase in hematocrit, as observed in these models follow­ing repeated dosing of high-dose EPO, may worsen the ow of the blood, leading to throm­boembolic complications [41], thus abolishing EPO- mediated protective, anti-ischemic effects. On the other hand, an anti-thrombotic effect of EPO applications has already been demonstrated in the mouse model [42], so that the scientic discussion is far from complete [43]. The tissue­protective effect of EPO appears to exist in isch­emic tissue, e.g., ap models to be primarily NO-associated, in which with persistent isch­emia, perfusion can be maintained in the criti­cally perfused ap (area). Angiogenesis does not seem to play the crucial role, as the newly formed vessels are functional only after about vedays, a time when the necrosis of the ap has already been irreversibly demarked.
For a possible individual use of EPO in the context of healing attempts in burn-injured patients, a very careful patient evaluation in the individual case must be advised. In particular, with regard to problematic pre-existing conditions such as hypertension, thromboembolic events or known malignancies, a particularly careful his­tory-taking and consideration of the risk-benet ratio must be ensured [44] (Fig.16.1). The use of EPO as a routine therapy in the proregenerative eld is not possible jet, as so far no clinical trial
could demonstrate positive results. A possible alternative would be the further development and testing of non-hematopoietic EPO derivatives. Here, however, a longer time can be expected until they have overcome the hurdles of the neces­sary approval studies and other preconditions and are available for widespread clinical use [12, 45].
References
1. Jourdanet D.De l’anemie des altitudes et de l’anemie en general dans ses rapports avec la pression del l’atmosphere. Balliere, Paris, 1863.
2. Jelkmann W.EPO after a century of research: younger than ever. Eur J Haematol. 2007;78:183–205.
3. Roche Pharma AG. NeoRecormon Multidose
50.000 IE. Germany Fachinformation: Grenzach­Wyhlen; 2011. https://translate.google.com/translate?
hl=en&sl=de&u=https://www.roche.de/dok/ NeoRecormon-reg-Multidose-50000-gebrauchsinfo­0-na-attach.pdf&prev=search. Accessed 25 Jan 2018
4. Bany-Mohammed FM, Slivka S, Hallman M. Recombinant human erythropoietin: pos­sible role as an antioxidant in rabbits. Pediatr Res. 1996;40:381–7.
5. Brines M, Cerami A.Erythropoietin -mediated tissue protection: reducing collateral damage from primary injury response. J Int Med. 2008;264:405–32.
6. Um M, Lodish HF. Antiapoptotic effects of erythropoietin in differentiated neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells require activation of both the STAT5 and AKT signaling pathways. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:5648–56.
7. Tramontano AF, Muniyappa R, Black AD, Blendea MC, Cohen I, Deng L, Sowers JR, Cutaia MV, El-Sherif N.Erythropoietin protects cardiacmyocytes from hypoxia-induced apoptosis through an Akt­dependent pathway. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2003;308:990–4.
8. Bahlmann FH, De Groot K, Spandau JM. EPO regulates endothelial progenitor cells. Blood. 2004;103:921–6.
9. Arcasoy MO. The non-haematopoietic biologi­cal effects of erythropoietin. Brit J Haematology. 2008;141:14–31.
10. Brines M, Grasso G, Fiordaliso F, Sfacteria A, Ghezzi P, Fratelli M, Latini R, Xie QW, Smart J, Su-Rick CJ, Pobre E, Diaz D, Gomez D, Hand C, Coleman T, Cerami A.EPO mediated tissue protection through an EPO and common beta-subunit heteroreceptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:14907–12.
11. Patel BM, NSA VP, Brines C, Mennini T, De Paola M, Erbayraktar Z, Erbayraktar S, Sepodes B, Thiemermann C, Ghezzi P, Yamin M, Hand CC, Xie QW, Coleman T, Cerami A.Nonerythropoietic, tissue-protective peptides derived from the tertiary
16 Erythropoietin: AnInnovative Therapeutic Approach inThermal Trauma
https://t.me/medicina_free
171
structure of erythropoietin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:10925–30.
12. Elliott S, Busse L, Bass MB, Lu H, Sarosi I, Sinclair AM, Spahr C, Um M, Van G, Begley CG. Anti­Epo receptor antibodies do not predict Epo receptor expression. Blood. 2006;107:1892–5.
13. Brown WM, Maxwell P, Graham AN, Yakkundi A, Dunlop EA, Shi Z, Johnston PG, Lappin TR.Erythropoietin receptor expression in non-small cell lung cancer: a question of antibody specicity. Stem Cells. 2007;25:718–22.
14. Taylor JE, McLaren M, Henderson IS, et al. Prothrombotic effect of erythropoietin in dialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1992;7(3):235–9.
15. Tobu M, Iqbal O, Fareed D, Chatha M, Hoppensteadt D, Bansal V, Fareed J.Erythropoietin-induced throm­bosis as a result of increased inammation and thrombin activatable brinolytic inhibitor. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2004;10(3):225–32.
16. Lim VS, Kirchner PT, Fangman J, Richmond J, DeGowin RL.The safety and the efcacy of mainte­nance therapy of recombinant human erythropoietin in patients with renal insufciency. Am J Kidney Dis. 1989;14(6):496–506.
17. Schif H, Lang SM.Hypertension induced by recom­binant human erythropoietin (rHU-EPO) can be prevented by indomethacin. Pathogenetic role of cyto­solic calcium. Eur J Med Res. 1997;2(3):97–100.
18. Ortega LM, Contreras G. The clinical impact of the physiological effects of erythropoietin and erythropoietin- stimulating agents on the incidence of malignancy, and hypertension: beyond anaemia. Nefrologia. 2009;29(4):288–94.
19. Corwin HL, Gettinger A, Fabian TC, May A, Pearl RG, Heard S, An R, Bowers PJ, Burton P, Klausner MA, Corwin MJ, EPO Critical Care Trials Group. Efcacy and Safety of EPO alfa in Critically Ill patients. New Engl J Med. 2007;357:965–76.
20. Aapro M, Osterwalder B, Scherhag A, Burger HU. Epoetin-beta treatment in patients with cancer chemotherapy-induced anaemia: the impact of ini­tial haemoglobin and target haemoglobin levels on survival, tumour progression and thromboembolic events. Br J Cancer. 2009;101:1961–71.
21. Bohlius J, Schmidlin K, Brillant C, Schwarzer G, Trelle S, Seidenfeld J, Zwahlen M, Clarke MJ, Weingart O, Kluge S, Piper M, Napoli M, Rades D, Steensma D, Djulbegovic B, Fey MF, Ray-Coquard I, Moebus V, Thomas G, Untch M, Schumacher M, Egger M, Engert A. Erythropoietin or Darbepoetin for patients with cancer--meta-analysis based on individual patient data. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;(3):CD007303.
22. Robinson H, Monafo WW, Saver SM, Gallagher NI.The role of erythropoietin in the anemia of ther­mal injury. Ann Surg. 1973;178:565–72.
23. Deitch EA, Sittig KM. A serial study of the eryth­ropoietic response to thermal injury. Ann Surg. 1993;217:293–9.
24. Pajoumand M, Erstad EL, Camamo JM.Use of epo­etin alfa in critically ill patients. Ann Pharmacother. 2004;38:1325–6.
25. Posluszny JA Jr, Muthumalaiappan K, Kini AR, Szilagyi A, He LK, Li Y, Gamelli RL, Shankar R. Burn injury dampens erythroid cell production through reprioritizing bone marrow hematopoietic response. J Trauma. 2011;71(5):1288–96.
26. Galeano M, Altavilla D, Bitto A, Minutoli L, Calò M, Lo Cascio P, Polito F, Giugliano G, Squadrito G, Mioni C, Giuliani D, Venuti FS, Squadrito F.Recombinant human erythropoietin improves angiogenesis and wound healing in experimental burn wounds. Crit Care Med. 2006;34:1139–46.
27. Bader A, Machens HG.Recombinant human erythro­poietin plays a pivotal role as a topical stem cell acti­vator to reverse effects of damage to the skin in aging and trauma. Rejuvenation Res. 2010;13:499–500.
28. Bader A, Ebert S, Giri S, Kremer M, Liu S, Nerlich A, Günter CI, Smith DU, Machens HG.Skin regen­eration with conical and hair follicle structure of deep second-degree scalding injuries via combined expression of the EPO receptor and beta common receptor by local subcutaneous injection of nanosized rhEPO.Int J Nanomedicine. 2012;7:1227–37.
29. Dornseifer U, Machens HG, Bader A, et al. Potential der topischen Anwendung von EPO zur Wundbehandlung. Poster, 40. Jahrestagung, DGPRÄC, 2009, Hannover.
30. Günter GI, Bader A, Dornseifer U, Egert S, Dunda S, Grieb G, Pallua WT, von Wild T, Siemers F, etal. A multicenter study on regenerative effects of eryth­ropoietin in burn and scald injuries -erythropoietin in burns-: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2013;14:124.
31. Tobalem M, Harder Y, Rezaeian F, Wettstein R.Secondary burn progression decreased by erythro­poietin. Crit Care Med. 2013;41(4):963–71.
32. Rezaeian F, Wettstein R, Amon M, Scheuer C, Schramm R, Menger MD, Pittet B, Harder Y. EPO protects critically perfused ap tissue. Ann Surg. 2008;248:919–29.
33. Harder Y, Amon M, Schramm R, Contaldo C, Metzkow E, Matzen A, Rücker M, Vollmar B, Menger MD.EPO reduces necrosis in critically ischemic myo­cutaneous tissue by protecting nutritive perfusion in a dose-dependent manner. Surgery. 2009;145:372–83.
34. Rezaeian F, Wettstein R, Egger JF, Sandmann F, Rücker M, Tobalem M, Vollmar B, Menger MD, Harder Y. Erythropoietin-induced upregulation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase but not vascular endo­thelial growth factor prevents musculocutaneus tissue from ischemic damage. Lab Investig. 2010;90:40–51.
35. Contaldo C, Meier C, Elsherbiny A, Harder Y, Trentz O, Menger MD, Wanner GA. Human recombinant erythropoietin protects the striated muscle micro­circulation of the dorsal skinfold from postischemic injury in mice. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2007;293(1):H274–83.
172
https://t.me/medicina_free
C. I. Günter and H.-G. Machens
36. Contaldo C, Elsherbiny A, Lindenblatt N, Plock JA, Trentz O, Giovanoli P, Menger MD, Wanner GA. Erythropoietin enhances oxygenation in criti­cally perfused tissue through modulation of nitric oxide synthase. Shock. 2009;31:599–606.
37. Erbayraktar Z, Erbayraktar S, Yilmatz O, Cerami A, Coleman T, Brines M.Nonerythropoietic tissue pro­tective compounds are highly effective facilitators of wound healing. Mol Med. 2009;15:235–41.
38. Wolf RF, Peng J, Friese P, Downs T, Burstein SA, Dale GL. Erythropoietin potentiates thrombus develop­ment in a canine arteriovenous shunt model. Thromb Haemost. 1997;77:1020–4.
39. Lindenblatt N, Menger MD, Klar E, Vollmar B. Darbepoeitin-Alpha does not promote micro­vascular thrombus formation in mice. Role of eNOS-dependent protection through platelet and endothelial cell deactivation. Arterioscl Thromb Vasc Biol. 2007;27(5):1191–8.
40. Hasegawa Y, Takamatsu J, Iwase T, Iwasada S, Kitamura S, Iwata H.Effects of recombinant human erythropoietin on thrombosis and brinolysis in autologous transfusion for hip surgery. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1999;119:384–7.
41. Sorg H, Kuhbier JW, Menger B, Reimers K, Harder Y, Vogt PM.The role of erythropoietin in improvement of wound healing. Chirurg. 2010;81:993–8.
42. Meistrell ME, Botchkina GI, Wang H, Di Santo E, Cockroft KM, Bloom O, Vishnubhakat JM, Ghezzi P, Tracey KJ. Tumor necrosis factor is a brain damaging cytocine in cerebral ischemia. Shock. 1997;8:34–8.
43. Yazihan N, Karakurt O, Ataoglu H. Erythropoietin reduces lopopolysaccharide-induced cell damage and
midkine secretion in U937 human histiocytic lym­phoma cells. Adv Ther. 2008;25:502–14.
44. Cuzzocrea S, Mazzon E, di Paola R, Genovese T, Patel NS, Britti D, de Majo M, Caputi AP, Thiemermann C. Erythropoietin reduces the degree of arthritis caused by type II collagen in the mouse. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;52:949–50.
45. Wiese L, Hempel C, Penkowa M, Kirkby N, Kurtzhals JA. Recombinant human erythropoietin increases survival and reduces neuronal apoptosis in a murine model of malaria. Malar J. 2008;7:3.
Further Readings
Gunter CI, Machens H-G, Ilg FP, Hapfelmeier A,
Jelkmann W, Egert-Schwender S, et al. A random­ized controlled trial: regenerative effects, efcacy and safety of erythropoietin in burn and scalding injuries. Front Pharmacol. 2018;9:951. https://doi.org/10.3389/
fphar.2018.00951.
Günter CI, Ilg FP, Hapfelmeier A, Egert-Schwender S,
Jelkmann W, Giri S, Bader A, Machens HG.Post hoc subgroup-analysis of the placebo-controlled, random­ized clinical trial “EPO in burns” relation between gender, concomitant medication and comorbidity with erythropoietin-treatment on wound healing in burn patients. Front Pharmacol. 2019; under revision.
Steppich B, Groha P, Ibrahim T, Schunkert H, Laugwitz
KL, Hadamitzky M, etal. Effect of erythropoietin in patients with acute myocardial infarction: ve-year results of the REVIVAL-3 trial. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2017;17(1):38. https://doi.org/10.1186/
s12872-016-0464-3.
Targeting C-Reactive Protein
https://t.me/medicina_free
inInammatory Disease
JohannesZeller andSteenU.Eisenhardt
17
17.1 C-Reactive Protein (CRP)
Despite extensive studies since CRP was rst dis­covered and named by Tillett and Francis in 1930 [1], the exact role and mechanism of action of this prototypical acute phase reactant [2] has not yet been dened satisfactorily. Here, we try to give a brief overview of C-reactive protein as a major factor in physiological and pathological processes, and discuss its potential role as a rewarding therapeutic target.
C-reactive protein (CRP) is a member of the phylogenetically ancient and highly conserved pentraxin protein family. As such, it serves as a pattern recognition molecule in innate immunity. CRP production is evoked by the increase of cir­culating proinammatory cytokines in plasma as a response to most forms of infection, inamma­tion, or tissue injury.
Interleukin-6 (IL-6) is the principal inducer of the CRP gene and regulates the expression through the activation of C/EBP transcription factors [3]. Additionally, interleukin-1β (IL-1β) and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) potentiate the IL-6 effects, act synergistically and enhance the CRP expression at the transcriptional level [4,
J. Zeller · S. U. Eisenhardt (*) Division of Reconstructive Microsurgery, Department of Plastic and Hand Surgery, Medical Center—University of Freiburg Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany e-mail: steffen.eisenhardt@uniklinik-freiburg.de
5]. The CRP gene is located on the long arm
(q-arm) of human chromosome 1 among other host protective genes. With a size of 2263 nucleo­tides, it extends from 1q21 to 1q23 with one sin­gle intron [6].
Although the main regulation of CRP gene expression happens on a transcriptional level, further post-transcriptional mechanisms have been reported. CRP is constantly synthesized at low rates and retained in the endoplasmic reticu­lum under physiological conditions [7]. However, during the acute phase response, the rate of secre­tion becomes more efcient, resulting in an acceleration of the CRP secretion, thus present­ing a post-transcriptional regulation [8, 9].
The concentrations of circulating CRP in serum may therefore rise dramatically in a cytokine- mediated response from undetectable levels in healthy individuals up to 1000-fold and more within one to three days [10].
The hepatic synthesis is the predominant ori­gin of CRP, and hepatocytes start with secretion of the acute phase reactant 6–8h after the onset of inammation or infection, while the inducing IL-6 levels rise within 1h in conditions of tissue damage (Fig. 17.1) [11, 12]. Although CRP expression has been reported in various other cell types as well, e.g., neuronal cells in Alzheimer’s disease [13], renal cortical tubular epithelial cells after inammatory stimuli [14], arterial tissue, respiratory epithelium [15], adi­pocytes, and leukocytes [1620], extrahepatic
© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019 D. Duscher, M. A. Shiffman (eds.), Regenerative Medicine and Plastic Surgery,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19958-6_17
173
174
https://t.me/medicina_free
J. Zeller and S. U. Eisenhardt
Fig. 17.1 Model of the genesis and the effects of CRP in ischemia/reperfusion injury
17 Targeting C-Reactive Protein inInammatory Disease
https://t.me/medicina_free
175
synthesis of CRP is not considered to affect plasma levels signicantly.
The plasma half-life of CRP is about 19–24h and it is cleared from circulation and catabolized by the hepatocytes. Plasma concentrations of cir­culating CRP remain unaffected by any physio­logical or pathological condition, and circulating CRP concentrations stable are solely dependent on synthesis rates [21, 22].
Therefore, CRP is an inammation marker widely appreciated and extensively used in clini­cal practice. As the plasma levels are solely determined by the induction stimuli and synthe­sis rates, CRP conveniently serves in diagnosis and monitoring as a surrogate parameter for the intensity of tissue damage in trauma, inamma­tion, and infection [22]. To date, a plethora of studies have suggested that even slightly ele­vated CRP serum levels in apparently healthy humans, as measured with high sensitivity assays (hsCRP), are directly associated with an increased risk of coronary events [2326]. Moreover, hsCRP may predict future clinical events among patients suffering various athero­thrombotic syndromes [2729]. In concentra­tions generally achieved during inammation, CRP induces tissue-factor production in periph­eral blood monocytes (PBM). The subsequent increased pro-coagulant activity may contribute to the development of thrombo- occlusive com­plications, as disseminated intravascular coagu­lation and thrombosis in inammatory states [30, 31].
These studies suggested that CRP might have not only a predictive but also causal role in vascu­lar disease. This sparked an interest of the role of CRP in perturbances of the microcirculation and in microsurgery. The wide distribution of CRP’s main ligand phosphocholine (PC) as a constitu­ent in pathogens (e.g., teichoic acid and lipopoly­saccharides of bacteria) and apoptotic or necrotic cellular membrane [3234], the conservation of its structure and the failure to detect any de­ciency or mutation of this protein in human addi­tionally suggests a pivotal physiological role of CRP in innate host defense [10]. While mem­branes of viable cells conceal the phosphocholine head groups, this major cell surface ligand of
CRP comes accessible if cells undergo apoptosis and necrosis [32]. Therefore, CRP binds only to damaged or activated plasma membranes and promotes benecial scavenging and host-defense functions [22, 35, 36]. Kaplan and Volanakis [28] were the rst to describe the activation of the classical complement pathway by CRP­opsonized microbial polysaccharides. CRP medi­ates clearance by opsonization. CRP-opsonized particles can then be directly bound by Fcγ recep­tors [37, 38] and besides, CRP regulates the com­plement activation of the classical pathway commencing at complement C1q [39, 40], lead­ing to phagocytosis by phagocytic cells [41, 42]. Further binding sites for other receptors on phagocytic cells have been suggested as well [43,
44]. The assumption of CRP enhancing the clear-
ance of apoptotic cells appears even more likely as CRP also binds specically to small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particles [4547].
17.2 The Relevance ofC-Reactive Protein inPlastic Surgery
17.2.1 Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury
In 1954, an innovative group around Plastic Surgeon Dr. Joseph Murray [48] performed the rst successful kidney transplantation in history, a breakthrough in organ transplantation later honored with the 1990 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine. Earlier attempts failed, inter alia, due to an ischemia-evoked inammatory cascade [49]. Among the rst to describe the common and relevant problem of ischemia/reperfusion injury (IRI) was Cerra etal. in 1975. IRI as a clinical phenomenon is of importance in a broad range of pathological conditions as myocardial infarction or stroke [50, 51] and describes an inammatory reaction to reperfusion of previously ischemic tissue [52, 53]. In the pathogenesis, recovered blood ow subsequently to the ischemic period brings leukocytes into the area of impaired tissue and initiates pathologic leukocyte-endothelium interaction [54, 55]. In these conditions, the tis­sue damage is aggravated by the accumulation of activated white blood cells producing reactive