Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / @xirurgi_2025 / @xirurgi_2025 - 442 - файл
.pdf
20 How toUse Surgical Ultrasound inResource-Limited Settings
https://t.me/medicina_free
225
28. Corbex M, Burton R, Sancho-Garnier H. Breast
cancer early detection methods for low and middle
income countries, a review of the evidence. Breast.
2012;21(4):428–34.
29. Bae JM, Kim EH. Breast density and risk of
breast cancer in Asian women: a meta-analysis of
observational studies. J Prev Med Public Health.
2016;49(6):367–75.
30. McDonald JA, Rao R, Gibbons M, etal. Symposium
report: breast cancer in India-trends, environmental
exposures and clinical implications. Cancer Causes
Control. 2021;32(6):567–75.
31. Shen S, Zhou Y, Xu Y, et al. A multi-centre randomised trial comparing ultrasound vs mammography for screening breast cancer in high-risk Chinese
women. Br J Cancer. 2015;112(6):998–1004.
32. Sayed S, Moloo Z, Ngugi A, etal. Breast camps for
awareness and early diagnosis of breast cancer in
countries with limited resources: a multidisciplinary
model from Kenya. Oncologist. 2016;21(9):1138–48.
33. Stavros AT, Thickman D, Rapp CL, Dennis MA,
Parker SH, Sisney GA.Solid breast nodules: use of
sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. Radiology. 1995;196(1):123–34.
34. Gunawardena RP, Gunawardena D, Metcalf C, Taylor
D, Wylie L.Inammatory breast disease: a pictorial
essay with radiological-pathological correlation. J
Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2017;61(1):70–6.
35. Rao R, Ludwig K, Bailey L, etal. Select choices in
benign breast disease: an initiative of the American
Society of Breast Surgeons for the American Board
of Internal Medicine Choosing Wisely(®) campaign.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25(10):2795–800.
36. Diepstraten SC, Sever AR, Buckens CF, etal. Value of
preoperative ultrasound-guided axillary lymph node
biopsy for preventing completion axillary lymph node
dissection in breast cancer: a systematic review and
meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21(1):51–9.
37. Brenin DR, Dietz JR, Baima J, etal. Pain management
in breast surgery: recommendations of a multidisciplinary expert panel-the American Society of Breast
Surgeons. Ann Surg Oncol. 2020;27(12):4588–602.
38. Shah S, Price D, Bukhman G, Shah S, Wroe E.Manual
of ultrasound for resource-limited settings, partners in
health, 2011. ISBN: 978-0-9828968-0-8.
39. Galbois A, Ait-Oufella H, Baudel JL, Kofman T,
Bottero J, Viennot S, Rabate C, Jabbouri S, Bouzeman
A, Guidet B, Offenstadt G, Maury E.Pleural ultrasound compared with chest radiographic detection
of pneumothorax resolution after drainage. Chest.
2010;138(3):648–55.
40. Rendón-Ramírez EJ, González-Villarreal M, MuñozEspinoza LE, Colunga-Pedraza PR, Moreno JF,
Salinas-Chapa M, Mercado-Longoria R, TreviñoGarcía KB, Cazares-Rendón E, Porcel JM. Pleural
effusions identied by point-of-care ultrasound
predict poor outcomes in decompensated cirrhosis.
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2021;47(11):3283–90.
41. Wongwaisayawan S, Suwannanon R, Prachanukool
T, Sricharoen P, Saksobhavivat N, Kaewlai
R. Trauma ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol.
2015;41(10):2543–61.
42. Correa C, Spiegelman L.A case of acute cholecystitis. J Educ Teach Emerg Med. 3:1.
43. Topin F, Thierry AL, Catrevaux O, Barnoux T,
Menguy P, Bertani A, Massoure PL, Geffroy Y,
Tourtier JP, Bougère J.Diagnostic accuracy of emergency physician- performed ultrasound for acute
appendicitis in a remote location. J Emerg Med.
2016;50(6):859–67.
44. Briskey M, Elliott B, Cooper M.Diagnosis of abdominal aortic aneurysm with point of care ultrasound
in the emergency department. Vis J Emerg Med.
2020;19:100727.
45. Hari S, Kumari S, Srivastava A, Thulkar S, Mathur S,
Thotton V.Image-guided versus palpation guided core
needle biopsy of palpable breast masses: a prospective
study. Indian J Med Res. 2016;143(5):597–604.
46. Santambrogio R, Opocher E, Costa M, Cappellani A,
Montorsi M. Survival and intra-hepatic recurrences
after laparoscopic radiofrequency of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with liver cirrhosis. J Surg
Oncol. 2005;89(4):218–25.
47. Abdalla EK, Pisters PW. Staging and pre-operative
evaluation of upper gastrointestinal malignancies.
Semin Oncol. 2004;31(4):513–29.
48. Feussner H, Omote K, Fink U, Walker SJ, Siewert
JR. Pretherapeutic laparoscopic staging in advanced
gastric carcinoma. Endoscopy. 1999;31(5):342–7.
49. Stein HJ, Kraemer SJ, Feussner H, Fink U, Siewert
JR. Clinical value of diagnostic laparoscopy with
laparoscopic ultrasound in patients with cancer
of the esophagus or cardia. J Gastrointest Surg.
1997;1(2):167–72.
50. Rau B, Hünerbein M, Schlag PM.Is there additional
information from laparoscopic ultrasound in tumour
staging? Dig Surg. 2002;19(6):479–83.
51. Santambrogio R, Opocher E, Costa M, Cappellani A,
Montorsi M. Survival and intra-hepatic recurrences
after laparoscopic radiofrequency of hepatocellular carcinoma in patient with liver cirrhosis. J Surg
Oncol. 2005;89(4):218–25.
52. Thompson DM, Arregui ME. Role of laparoscopic
ultrasound in cancer management. Semin Surg Oncol.
1998;15(3):166–75.
53. Barbot DJ, Marks JH, Feld RI, Liu JB, Rosato
FE. Improved staging of liver tumours using laparoscopic intra-operative ultrasound. J Surg Oncol.
1997;64(1):63–7.
54. Foley EF, Kolecki RV, Schirmer BD.The accuracy of
laparoscopic ultrasound in the detection of colorectal
liver metastases. Am J Surg. 1998;176(3):262–4.
55. Tilleman EH, de Castro SM, Busch OR, Bemelman
WA, van Gulik TM, Obertop H, et al. Diagnostic
laparoscopy and laparoscopy for staging of patients
with malignant proximal bile duct obstruction. J
Gastrointest Surg. 2002;6(3):426–30.
56. Callery MP, Strasberg SM, Doherty GM, Soper NJ,
Norton JA. Staging laparoscopy with laparoscopic
ultrasonography: optimizing resectability in hepato-

226
https://t.me/medicina_free
B. A. Schrope et al.
biliary and pancreatic malignancy. J Am Coll Surg.
1997;185(1):33–9.
57. Pietrabissa A, Caramella D, Di Candio G, Carobbi A,
Boggi U, Rossi G, etal. Laparoscopy and laparoscopic
ultrasound for staging for pancreatic cancer: critical
appraisal. World J Surg. 1999;23(10):998–1002.
58. Durup Scheel-Hincke J, Mortensen MB, Qvist N,
Hovendal CP.TNM staging and assessment of resectability of pancreatic cancer by laparoscopic ultrasonography. Surg Endosc. 1999;13(10):967–71.
59. Catheline JM, Turner R, Rizk N, Barrat C, Champault
G. The use of diagnostic laparoscopy supported
by laparoscopic ultrasonography in the assessment
of pancreatic cancer. Surg Endosc. 1999;13(3):
239–45.
60. Falcone RA Jr, Fegelman EJ, Nussbaum MS, Brown
DL, Bebbe TM, Merhar GL, etal. A prospective comparison of laparoscopic ultrasound vs intraoperative
cholangiogram during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Surg Endosc. 1999;13(8):784–8.
61. Thompson DM, Arregui ME, Tetik C, Madden MT,
Wegener M.A comparison of laparoscopic ultrasound
with digital ourocholangiography for detecting choledocholithiasis during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 1998;12(7):929–32.
62. Tranter SE, Thompson MH. A prospective singleblinded controlled study comparing laparoscopic
ultrasound of the common bile duct with operative
cholangiography. Surg Endosc. 2003;17(2):216–9.
63. Gopaul R, Bearman G, Stevens MP.Ultrasound use in
re-source-limited settings: a systematic review. J Glob
Radiol. 2018;4(1):Article 4.
64. Shah S, Bellows BA, Adedipe AA, Totten JE,
Backlund BH, Sajed D.Perceived barriers in the use
of ultrasound in developing countries. Crit Ultrasound
J. 2015;7(1):28.
65. Salmon M, Landes M, Hunchak C, Paluku J, Malemo
Kalisya L, Salmon C, Muller MM, Wachira B,
Mangan J, Chhaganlal K, Kalanzi J, Azazh A, Berman
S, Zied ES, Lamprecht H. Getting it right the rst
time: dening regionally relevant training curricula
and provider core competencies for point-of-care
ultrasound education on the African continent. Ann
Emerg Med. 2017;69(2):218–26.
66. Gbande P, Adam-bounou K, Sonhaye L, AgodaKoussema LK, Adjenou K.Medical ultrasound practice in developing countries: example of Togo. Open J
Radiol. 2018;8:217–22.
67. Spencer JK, Adler RS. Utility of portable ultrasound in a community in Ghana. J Ultrasound Med.
2008;27(12):1735–43.
68. Sippel S, Muruganandan K, Levine A, Shah S.Review
article: use of ultrasound in the developing world. Int
J Emerg Med. 2011;4:72.
69. Britton N, Miller MA, Safadi S, Siegel A, Levine AR,
McCurdy MT. Tele-ultrasound in resource-limited
settings: a systematic review. Front Public Health.
2019;7:244.
70. Harvey HB, Ahn R, Price DD, Burke TF.Innovating
for the developing world: meeting the affordability
challenge. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014;203(4):835–7.

How toBuild anAcademic Global
https://t.me/medicina_free
Surgery Center: TheUCSF CHESA
Experience
AvaYap, PattiOrozco, ZaynaTommalieh,
DavidBayne, PhyllisKisa, LuggyaTonnyStone,
AlexEmmanuelElobu, NaomiKebba,
andMarissaA.Boeck
Building capacity dissolves differences. It irons out inequalities.
– A.P. J.Abdul Kalam
21
A. Yap
Department of Surgery, UCSF School of Medicine,
San Francisco, CA, USA
P. Orozco · Z. Tommalieh
UCSF Center for Health Equity in Surgery and
Anesthesia, UCSF Institute for Global Health
Sciences, San Francisco, CA, USA
D. Bayne
UCSF Center for Health Equity in Surgery and
Anesthesia, UCSF Institute for Global Health
Sciences, San Francisco, CA, USA
Department of Urology, UCSF School of Medicine,
San Francisco, CA, USA
P. Kisa
Makerere University College of Health Sciences,
Kampala, Uganda
Paediatric Surgery and Paediatic Urology, Mulago
National Referral Hospital, Kampala, Uganda
L. T. Stone
Department of Anesthesia and Emergency Medicine,
Makerere University College of Health Sciences,
Kampala, Uganda
Accident and Emergency, Mulago National Referral
Hospital, Kampala, Uganda
A. E. Elobu
Gastrointestinal, General & Cancer Surgeon, Head of
Colorectal Surgery, Mulago National Referral
Hospital, Kampala, Uganda
N. Kebba
Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgeon, Department of
Adult Cardiac Surgery, Uganda Heart Institute,
Kampala, Uganda
Faculty, Makerere University College of Health
Sciences, Kampala, Uganda
M. A. Boeck (*)
UCSF Center for Health Equity in Surgery and
Anesthesia, UCSF Institute for Global Health
Sciences, San Francisco, CA, USA
Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, UCSF School of
Medicine & Zuckerberg San Francisco General
Hospital, San Francisco, CA, USA
e-mail: marissa.boeck@ucsf.edu
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023
M. A. Hardy, B. R. Hochman (eds.), Global Surgery, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28127-3_21
227

228
https://t.me/medicina_free
A. Yap et al.
Abbreviations
AAGS Association for Academic
Global Surgery
AAS Association for Academic
Surgery
ACGME Accreditation Council for
Graduate Medical Education
ADGHE Anesthesia Division of Global
Health Equity
CHESA Center for Health Equity in
Surgery and Anesthesia
COSECSA College of Surgeons of East,
Central and Southern Africa
CUGH Consortium of Universities
forGlobal Health
FIC Fogarty International Center
GSSA Global Surgery Student Alliance
HIC High-income country
IGHS Institute for Global Health
Sciences
IGOT SMART IGOT Surgical Management
And Reconstructive Training
IGOT Institute for Global Ortho-
paedics and Traumatology
LMIC Low- and middle-income country
MOU Memorandum of understanding
MU Makerere University
NIH National Institutes of Health
PIH Partners in Health
UCSF HEAL UCSF Health, Equity, Action,
and Leadership
UCSF University of California, San
Francisco
UGHE University of Global Health
Equity
USAID United States Agency for
International Development
WIP Work In Progress
Introduction/Background
Denitions ofKey Concepts
Global Surgery
A eld of healthcare which aims to “improve
health outcomes & achieve health equity for all
people who require surgical care, with a special
emphasis on underserved populations & populations in crisis” [1].
Further, global surgery is “the enterprise of
providing improved & equitable surgical care to
the world’s population, with its core tenets as the
issues of need, access & quality…the patient
requiring surgery as their focus” [2].
Academic Global Surgery
As a subset of global surgery, academic global
surgery is dedicated to the training of surgical
educators and the discovery of new knowledge to
correct global disparities in access to surgical
care [3].
Health Equity
Health being a fundamental human right, health
equity is “the absence of unfair, avoidable, or
remediable differences among groups of people.
Health equity is achieved when everyone can
attain their full potential for health and wellbeing” [4].
Public Health
Researchers, practitioners, and educators prevent
disease and injury at the community and population level. Public health professionals identify the
causes of diseases and disability and then implement large-scale solutions [5].
Resource-Constrained Settings
A locale where the capability to providesystems
of care for its habitants does not meet population needs. In this context, this entails a local
with limited capacity for vital healthcare access
and safe services [6].
This chapter illustrates the Center for Health
Equity in Surgery and Anesthesia (CHESA)
experience in establishing an academic global
surgery center. Readers should be mindful that
the same steps and anecdotes will not be universally true for other prospective or established
academic global surgery centers. CHESA is
based in San Francisco, California, USA, and
while health disparities are prevalent in this
community and across the USA, this Center is
located in a health-resource hub within a highincome country (HIC). Any dialogue around

21 How toBuild anAcademic Global Surgery Center: TheUCSF CHESA Experience
https://t.me/medicina_free
229
global engagement requires familiarity with the
concept of decolonization (see Chap. 3). In the
context of global health, decolonization is
broadly dened as an effort to shift away from
thehistorical dynamics of power and dominance
to implement equitable systems to improve populationhealth [7]. Recently, attention has been
drawn to a dichotomy in global health, where
global health organizations have historically
lacked diversity and inclusivity, mirroring the
society and values of Western high-income
countries while maintaining a xation on intervening in LMIChealth systems [8]. Thedecolonization movement calls for the autonomy of
previously underrepresented nations to build
and sustain theirown health systems and workforce, as well asincrease inclusiveness of these
nationsin conversations within the global health
community [9]. CHESA engages in all of its
activities with these practices and prioritiesat
the forefront.
Within global health, surgery and
perioperative care have not received attention
proportionate to their importance for overall
health and well-being. The reasons behind
surgery’s stigma are varied, including but not
limited to systematic barriers to accessing care, a
misperception that surgical care is overly costly,
and the variable denition of global surgery and
all it encompasses [1]. In a eld that heavily
relies not only on equipment but also on trained
surgeons, anesthesiologists, nurses, and others in
the perioperative space, hospitals and clinics
frequently have to navigate shortages and
unequal distributions of resources while still
aiming to provide quality care.
Themajorityofpeople in the world do not have
access to equitable, safe, and affordable surgical
care, prompting academic and government
institutions to build and foster creative models to
address the problem [10]. As academic global
surgery centers emerge, one aim has been to
provide training and direct resources towards
growing local perioperativeworkforce capacity,
seeking to provide sustainable and prosperous
solutions to varied barriers to safe surgical access
around the world [11].
Academic global surgery centers have been
established all over the world,and continue to
increase in number, creating a network of centers
in high-, middle-, and low-income countries
focused on addressing both local and global
healthcare challenges. In South Africa, an uppermiddle income country, the Centre for Global
Surgery was established in 2019 within
Stellenbosch University. This center works
toward promoting equitable surgical care in
South Africa and sub-Saharan Africa through
high-quality research, policy maker engagement,
and education, with an overall mission to be a
global surgery research center of excellence with
collaborations within and outside South Africa
[12]. Similarly, the University for Global Health
Equity (UGHE) was created in 2019in Rwanda,
a low-income country. Initially envisioned by
Partners in Health (PIH) in 2014 to build a university that would advance global health delivery, the university focuses on training future
global health leaders and equipping them with
the necessary skillsets to build effective, lasting,
and equitable health systems. As of 2021, their
programs included Bachelor of Medicine,
Bachelor of Surgery, Master of Science in Global
Health Delivery, Executive Education, and an
Institute of Global Health Equity Research [13].
Specic to surgery, UGHE has a Center for
Equity in Global Surgery, whose mission is to
“create equitable access to quality, safe, and
holistic surgical, obstetric, and anesthesia care
for vulnerable populations provided through
integrated, compassionate, and community-centric approach,” with a focus on empowering local
leaders and solutions [14]. The Harvard Program
in Global Surgery and SocialChange (PGSSC)
is an example of an academic global surgery
center in the USA, a HIC. PGSSC’s mission
advocates for “universal access to safe, affordable surgical, anesthesia, and OB/GYN care
when needed.” The Harvard Program exhibits its
mission in surgical and health systems strengthening (i.e. fellowship) [15]. Additional academic global surgery programs in the USA
include The Center for Global Surgery at the
University of Utah [16] andthe Global Surgical
Track in the general surgery residency program at Baylor College of Medicine [17],
among others in the USA, Canada, and across
the globe.

230
https://t.me/medicina_free
A. Yap et al.
University ofCalifornia, San Francisco
Center forHealth Equity inSurgery
andAnesthesia
The Center for Health Equity in Surgery and
Anesthesia, abbreviated CHESA, is a center based
at the University of California, San Francisco
(UCSF) within the University’s Institute for Global
Health Sciences (IGHS). Led by the efforts of a surgeon and anesthesiologist at UCSF,as well as additional championing faculty, and the support of
partners at Makerere University (MU) in Uganda,
CHESA ofcially launched in March 2020 during
the beginnings of the COVID-19 pandemic. The
name of the Center is reective of the global health
equity focus of the group and the inclusion of the
wide range of professionals working within surgery,
anesthesia, and perioperative care. Inclusive of all
related elds, current CHESA members represent
anesthesiology, general surgery and surgical subspecialties, dermatology, nursing, pathology, public
health, obstetrics and gynecology, and biostatistics,
among others and with new additions continually
welcomed.
CHESA’s mission statement is “To advance
equity in surgery, anesthesia, and perioperative
care worldwide through ethical and innovative
academic engagement.” With this in mind, the
Center has four guiding principles:
• Champion health equity for vulnerable
populations.
• Elevate interventions prioritized by local and
international partners.
• Harmonize approaches between local and
international populations.
• Prioritize implementation and impact
evaluation.
CHESA shows its commitment to these
principles through its work, which has four focus
areas: Fellowship Program, Education, Research,
and Advocacy and Policy. CHESA’s aims and
structure are rooted in 20years of partnerships
and relationships established in the early 2000s
by the Center’s founding directors. The Center’s
formation has been an iterative process, with a
focus on inclusivity to help unite and align many
established and frequently parallel global health
equity efforts at UCSF under the CHESA
umbrella. Listed below are prior groups, individuals, and institutions which heavily contributed toward CHESA’s creation [18].
Global Partners in Anesthesia and Surgery
(GPAS): The formation of GPAS began with
leads from UCSF and MU, with a focus on faculty and trainee exchange and mentorship while
working toward addressing the surgical care crisis in Uganda. Over a decade,GPAS fostered collaborations that contributed to the
foundationofCHESA.
Institute of Global Health Sciences (IGHS):
Dr. Haile Debas is credited with creating IGHS in
1999, which was the rst academic institution in
the USA to use the term “global health” in its
name. Today this institute is home to six centers:
the Center for Global Health Diplomacy,
Delivery, and Economics; Center for Pandemic
Preparedness and Response; Center for Global
Infectious and Parasitic Diseases; Center for
Strategic Information & Public Health Practice;
Center for Global Maternal, Newborn, and Child
Health; and CHESA [19].
Anesthesia Division of Global Health Equity
(ADGHE): Located within UCSF’s Department
of Anesthesia, ADGHE was a consortium of
anesthesiologists based in the USA, Uganda, and
Tanzania who collaborated on research pertinent
to the use and training of safe anesthesia access
and care. ADGHE eventually consolidated into
CHESA, enriching the variety of members and
advisors who work toward the goal of health
equity in the perioperative space. Center for
Global Surgical Studies (CGSS): Located within
UCSF's Department of Surgery, CGSS launched
in 2015 with the mission to tackle the global burden of surgical disease by improvingaccess to
quality surgical care in low-resource settings
through education and research. The Centerprovided research mentorship to future leaders in
academic global surgery, and established sustained partnerships with collaborators in
LMICs.ElementsofCGSS laid the groundwork
forthe subsequentfoundingofCHESA [20].
Institute for Global Orthopaedics and
Traumatology (IGOT): Located within UCSF,

21 How toBuild anAcademic Global Surgery Center: TheUCSF CHESA Experience
https://t.me/medicina_free
231
IGOT was founded in 2006 with the goal of
addressing global disparities in orthopedic
trauma care. IGOT’s agship innovation is the
IGOT SMART (Surgical Management and
Reconstructive Training) course. This course
provides orthopedic surgeons in resource-limited
settings with the skills to successfully perform
surgeries to reduce the incidence of amputations.
Through the IGOT Portal, educational material
and the SMART course are available anywhere in
the world with an online classroom format. IGOT
and CHESA are active partners in distributing
advanced educational tools and resources
[21]. Health, Equity, Action, and Leadership
Initiative (HEAL): Based in UCSF, HEAL’s mission is to have health professionals train and
practice in settings with vulnerable populations,
both in the USA and internationally. The HEAL
fellowship has two tracks, one track for “site fellows” who have roots in a HEAL partner site or
community they currently serve and an alternative track for “rotating fellows” who rotate over
two years. HEAL’s initiatives aim to strengthen
and bolster established yet underserved healthcare systems. In alignment with this mission,
HEAL fellows are embraced as CHESA fellows,
sharing the guiding principles of justice, solidarity, and equity throughout their work [22].
Components ofaCenter
In this section we will explore in more detail the
components of a center, which include a fellowship program, education, research, and
partnerships.
Fellowship Program
Academic scholarly training in the research,
education, and advocacy of surgical practice in
underserved settings is a keystone of a successful
academic global surgical center. Historically,
short-term international electives were the archetype for global surgical exposure and were highly
sought after by American surgical residents [23].
However, these international rotations harbor the
dubious reputation of “medical tourism” by
solely accommodating the needs of the trainee
traveling from a HIC [24, 25]. This unilateral
approach is no longer sufcient nor accepted for
equitable engagement in academic global surgery
or to become an expert in this eld. Similarly,
technical skill-building courses for operative preparedness in LMICs are generally created for
traveling HIC trainees but do not typically
strengthen surgical capacity within the local setting [26]. Therefore, a concerted effort is needed
to encourage crosstalk among HICs, LMICs, and
underserved populations to promote equitable
training opportunities which can be offered to the
Global “South” and “North,” as well as to
resource-constrained communities within HICs.
While there is no broadly accepted set of
competencies for academic global surgery, the
Consortium of Universities for Global Health
(CUGH) and the Accreditation Council for
Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) have set
forth guidelines on the essential components of
comprehensive global health education
(Table21.1) [27, 28]. Nevertheless, HIC perspectives predominate existing global surgical curricula and perpetuate an imbalance in educational
Table 21.1 Published global health competencies
Consortium of
Universities for Global
Health
Global burden of disease Medical knowledge
Globalization of health
and healthcare
Social and
environmental
determinants of health
Capacity strengthening Interpersonal and
Collaboration,
partnering and
communication
Ethics Systems-based practice
Professional practice
Health equity and social
justice
Program management
Sociocultural and
political awareness
Strategic analysis
Accreditation Council for
Graduate Medical Education
Patient care and procedural
skills
Practice-based learning
and improvement
communication skills
Professionalism

232
https://t.me/medicina_free
A. Yap et al.
priorities [29]. Thus, a conscientious approach
must be taken to build a training program that
does not cater solely to HIC trainees and to adequately resourced population interests. The
global surgical curriculum should be thoughtfully curated to meet the needs of scholars from
diverse demographics and countries [30].
Instruction for these competencies can take
various forms, from informal didactics to formal
degrees. CHESA offers a plethora of training
modalities, from multiyear funded research and
clinical fellowships to summer internships.
CHESA developed a health equity fellowship with
a simultaneously exible and structured curriculum modeled after the CUGH competency guidelines [31]. By following the CUGH framework,
the aim was to make the scholarly objectives
widely applicable to both low- and high-resource
applicants, as the competencies can be universally
employed to most surgical inequities. The curriculum embodies a full year of coursework spread
over 11 domains. The content in each domain
includes online modules, required and supplemental readings, lectures, and Socratic sessions, such
as journal clubs and work-in-progress (WIP)meetings. Material is collaboratively decided on by
multidisciplinary faculty and graduating fellows.
Course content covers global and domestic health
equity topics, research methodology, teaching, and
mentorship. Fellows also have the exibility to
customize their own curriculum to t their academic interests and goals, which allows support
for fellows with different backgrounds, goals, and
local resources.
Notably, LMIC trainees and clinicians are
strongly encouraged to apply to CHESA’s health
equity fellowship. This recruitment strategy demonstrates the bidirectionality of the training program to optimize diversity and curriculum
malleability. All fellows have access to institutional research resources, mentorship from a
broad range of faculty, and funding tailored to
their academic needs. Funding support is especially important for fellows from low-resource
settings, providing the means to conduct research
and other scholarly work that might otherwise
not be nancially feasible. These fellows from
resource-constrained environments are uniquely
positioned to understand the local disease burden
and challenges, and will have insight into academic work that should take priority. Recruitment
of fellows from LMICs guarantees that their critical perspectives are reected in the health equity
fellow curriculum and activities, ensuring the fellowship remains relevant to scholars from all
backgrounds. Curriculum priorities are therefore
not driven solely by HIC interests but rather
established by contributors across resource settings that seek to broadly represent issues relevant to surgery and health equity globally.
In conjunction with the National Institutes of
Health (NIH) Fogarty International Center (FIC),
the University of California Global Health Institute
(UCGHI) offers year-long funded GloCal fellowships for health professional students and postdoctoral fellows [32]. Fellows can be US citizens
afliated with the GloCal consortium or postdoctoral LMIC applicants from partner sites. To safeguard equitable project ownership, both mentors
must be from both within the University of
California system and the local partner site.
Research aims are directed toward understanding
and managing the disease burden in 21 designated
LMIC sites in Southeast Asia, Sub-Saharan Africa,
and South America, where longstanding collaborations have been established [33]. Previous surgically oriented GloCal projects have addressed
hospital registry data decits in Mozambique,
trauma care in Tanzania, treatment of congenital
anomalies in Uganda, and surgical oncology
capacity building in Tanzania [34–37]. The FIC
funds that support an LMIC fellow or principal
investigator- initiated projects in international afliated universities are excellent examples of the
American government providing tangible support
to academic global surgery initiatives [38]. The
consistency of LMIC partnership is key to the sustainability of the program, as this exchange of
international research fellows is built on the longstanding relationships with partnering sites.
The 1- or 2-year UCSF HEAL (Health,
Equity, Action, and Leadership) fellowship is
another global surgical opportunity linked with
CHESA that is focused on clinical practice for
board eligible or certied medical providers
while maintaining core scholarly aspects [39].
The length of the fellowship is meant to allow
for an immersive experience, where the fellow

21 How toBuild anAcademic Global Surgery Center: TheUCSF CHESA Experience
https://t.me/medicina_free
233
works as a full-time clinician at a partner hospital. Furthermore, the fellowship includes a fully
funded Masters of Public Health or an equivalent degree for all fellows.The same theme of
bidirectional exchange applies. HEAL fellows
can either be “rotating” fellows, who are visiting US clinicians sponsored by UCSF, or “site”
fellows, who are actively employed by HEAL
partner sites and are rooted in their immediate
communities. USA-based HEAL fellows have
the option to work with domestic and international underrepresented populations. A fellow
prerequisite is a full commitment to pursue a
lifelong career of providing service to marginalized patients, with a recognition that they do not
necessarily need to reside in the Global “South.”
Deployment sites for fellows range from the
Navajo nation in New Mexico, USA, to Mbale,
Uganda. The cross-sectional reach of the underserved transcends the division between HIC and
LMIC, broadening the denition of the “global
surgeon” to being one that strives to alleviate
the surgical inequity irrespective of geographic
location.
Junior investigators, such as undergraduate
students, may choose to enroll in a shorter summer internship with CHESA.Students can work
on health equity projects centered around the
California Bay Area or tackle more far-reaching
issues in international surgical health, with the
guidance of an assigned mentor. Preference is
again given to underrepresented minorities and
rst-generation trainees. For faculty members,
CHESA also offers a Global MedEd Simulation
Fellowship Program, which is a one-year nonACGME program hosted at UCSF and cosponsored by the World Federation of Societies
of Anaesthesiologists (WFSA). This program is
available for medical educators from LMICs.
Fellows spend up to three months in San
Francisco receiving intensive training on simulation methodology, then return to their home
institutions to implement their projects, which
are supported with stipends. The fellowship
goals are to develop expertise in simulation as
an educational strategy and to acquire a foundation to conduct scholarly work in simulation
education.
Education andExpert Consultation
In addition to a formal fellowship pathway, an
academic global surgery center can provide
impactful education and access to expert
consultants through association with other
disciplines and professional societies. This access
to multidisciplinary consultants and diverse skill
sets is the hallmark of a holistic academic global
surgery center.
At UCSF, an intensive 2-week global health
pathway elective is provided by the Ofce of
Graduate Medical Education and is free to students and trainees enrolled in the global health
track. A series of 27 didactics led by local and
international experts of all specialties from psychiatry to pharmacy exposes the learner to the
fundamentals of global health from a wide range
of perspectives. Global surgery comprises just
one of the many sessions. The elective is designed
to be a launchpad for students interested in the
eld who are seeking to become more involved in
a specic area of global health.
Other academic surgical organizations have
offered intensive training for leadership and
research skills. For example, the College of
Surgeons of East, Central and Southern Africa
(COSECSA) and the Association of Academic
Surgery (AAS) periodically hold a virtual
Fundamentals of Research Course, which is open
to all surgeon researchers for a nominal fee [40].
The course agenda ranges from abstract
writing to effective presentation skills and
includes breakout rooms for more in-depth
discussion. Some of the skillsets touched upon
are shown in Table21.2. Virtual platforms lower
Table 21.2 Essential and ancillary (nontechnical) skills
relevant to academic global surgery, as showcased in the
Fundamentals of Research Course [40]
Fundamental skills Additional skills
Study design Economic evaluation
Hypothesis generation Implementation science
Abstract and manuscript
writing
Research presentation Advocacy
Ethical considerations Quantitative/statistical
Policy making
analysis
Qualitative analysis

234
https://t.me/medicina_free
A. Yap et al.
the barriers to access and allows anyone with an
Internet connection to participate in these
educational opportunities. In fact, the COSECSA
training curriculum for a general surgery resident
requires completion of mandatory research and
leadership courses [41].
Other essential skill sets to satisfy the global
surgical competencies can be obtained within an
equipped academic institution [40]. At UCSF, the
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics
provides robust, rigorous courses for learners to
hone clinical research skills. Students can select
from a myriad of topics. These can be enrolled as
standalone classes, as fulllment toward an
Advanced Training in Clinical Research certicate, or as part of a Public Health Masters or
Doctorate degree. An academic global surgery
center can partner with these departments to create a pathway for trainees to take advantage of
valuable educational experiences that may be distinct from the realm of surgery-specic
knowledge.
For those who prefer to seek expert guidance,
access to biostatistical consultation is highly benecial for trainees and faculty members alike
who are undertaking research projects involving
quantitative data. Likewise, quality improvement
committees may assist local teams in the development of hospital-level interventions to improve
perioperative outcomes. Successful integration
with other subjects requires a network of experts,
which can be fostered within a university or a
similar institution. Applied research methods
such as analysis of cost-effectiveness, implementation science, qualitative analysis, and geospatial analysis can all be garnered through eld
expert consultants from these departments. Many
are readily available to mentor or facilitate projects to ensure methodologic rigor of such
approaches.
Research
Given the underlying goal to strengthen lowresource surgical systems, augmenting research
capacity in LMIC and domestic resourceconstrained settings is a main mission for an aca-
demic global surgery center. Research-related
resources are not equitably distributed between
high- and low-resource settings. Researchers
from LMICs and domestic resource-denied communities face multiple roadblocks to performing
quality investigations, ranging from minimal
“protected time” to weak academic visibility to a
general shortage of resources. The paucity of
funding is a major limitation in the growth of
research capacity in LMICs and domestic
resource-constrained areas, as local institutions
are often unable to support global surgical
research, especially if it has not been made a
local or national priority. In fact, the dearth of
funding begets a dearth of accessible, reliable
data to inform public health priorities, which in
turn exacerbates the lack of research capacity in
resource-denied settings [42].
Frequently, this resource decit translates into
inadequate access to practical tools such as specialized lab equipment, research personnel, statistical support, and data management
infrastructure. Research reporting and publication are also unfairly stacked against investigators from LMICs and domestic under-resourced
settings, as journal paywalls prevent published
ndings from reaching these investigators and
open access fees are frequently prohibitive.
Additionally, the language barrier is a major hurdle imposed on researchers who do not speak
English, stiing communication to the broader
academic community and hindering career
advancement [43]. Thus, researchers from
LMICs and domestic resource-constrained areas
are forced to be reliant on HICs for both funding
and resources to conduct research studies, which
further perpetuates the power imbalance [44]
extensively discussed previously in Chap. 3.
An equitable center can help lower these
barriers by providing research funding and
resources to investigators from international and
domestic resource-denied communities who
propose projects that are centered around local
site interests [45]. The UCSF CHESA Fellow
Fund allocates such unrestricted funding to
support all fellowship endeavors, including career
development skill courses to acquire the necessary
research toolkit to succeed. Importantly, the
Соседние файлы в папке @xirurgi_2025
