Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / @xirurgi_2025 / @xirurgi_2025 - 394 - файл

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
45 Мб
Скачать
162 ATYPICAL CAUSES OF LEG ULCERATION
https://t.me/medicina_free
TABLE3.10 
Allergic contact dermatitis Varicose eczema Bacterial folliculitis Pustular psoriasis Pyoderma gangrenosum Bullous pemphigoid Malignancy Cellulitis Venous ulceration
Source: Adapted from Conde (2015) and Nichol etal. (2017).
Possible dierential diagnoses oferosive pustular dermatosis.
recognised and can be confused with other lower limb conditions, as indicated in Table3.10 (Duus- Grovell2021; Conde2015), therefore the exact incidence and prevalence of EPD are unknown (Conde 2015). EPD is thought to be most commonly seen in individuals who are elderly, female and have a history of chronic venous insuciency (Lee et al. 2020; British Association of Dermatologists2022).
The exact cause of EPD is unclear, but it is thought to be triggered by sun damage or as a result of skin injury (e.g. previous surgery or trauma). On the leg, EPD is often accompanied by venous stasis or atrophy and is not uncommon in those having long- term compression therapy (Dawn etal.2003). It can be confused with cellulitis (Zhou et al. 2015) but has unique characteristics that determine its management. Nicol et al. (2017) indicated that there is a strong association between the development of EPD and the chronic inammation that is associated with venous insuciency. Other proposed causative factors are neutrophil dysfunction, zinc deciency and occlusion with compression bandaging (Conde 2015; Di Altobrando etal.2020).
Examination
EPD usually occurs on the gaiter region of the limb and can be unilateral or bilateral. The condition typically presents with supercial crusted erosions and multiple pustules with sterile pus to surrounding skin (Figure 3.16); the removal of the crusts reveals
本书版权归John Wiley & Sons Inc.所有
Atypical Causes of Leg Ulceration 163
https://t.me/medicina_free
FIGURE3.16 Pustules and crusted areas to surrounding skin.
Source: Erdmann etal. (2009) / John Wiley & Sons. Reproduced withpermission.
shiny granulation tissue (Nichol etal.2017; Di Altobrando etal.2020) after the removal of the frank pus.
Left untreated, areas of EPD simply increase and join up to form larger, shallow erosive lesions; the condition has been described as having ‘pustular lakes’ (Bull and Mortimer1995). On the leg, it is not uncommon to nd circumferential patches of crusty fragile scabs or ragged erosive areas from ankle to knee. When scabs are absent the clinical features have similarities to cellulitis. Large erosive areas are often wrongly described as ulceration.
Investigations
Histology from a biopsy of the lesions is often non- specic and may reveal inltration of polynuclear neutrophils in the dermis (Nichol etal.2017; Reschke etal.2021). Reschke etal. (2021) proposed that the presence of these inammatory cells (possibly attributed to trauma in the area) contributes to exacerbating the cycle of
本书版权归John Wiley & Sons Inc.所有
164 ATYPICAL CAUSES OF LEG ULCERATION
https://t.me/medicina_free
inammation, resulting in poor healing. A biopsy of the area may also be helpful to exclude other possible wound aetiologies (Conde2015).
Wound swabs are not usually indicated and can be misleading in the treatment of EPD. The swab results often reveal secondary colonisation with bacteria and fungi such as Staphylococcus aureus and Candida albicans rather than a primary cause of infection (Zhou etal.2015; Nichol etal.2017). A study by Dawn etal. (2003) found 54% of patients to have laboratory evidence of fungal infection that cleared after antifungal treatment. The remaining participants achieved clearance with topical steroids and interestingly a change in management from multilayered ‘four­stretch regime.
Arterial status should be established using a Doppler ultrasound to calculate the ABPI and will assist in guiding suitability for com­pression therapy (Wounds UK2016).
layer’ compression to a long-
Diagnosis
There are currently no specic clinical criteria for the diagnosis of EPD and presenting clinical features may be similar to other aetiolo­gies, thus reaching an accurate diagnosis can be challenging (Nichol etal.2017). Table3.10 indicates possible dierential diagnoses to be considered. Diagnosis of EPD is often made following exclusion of other possible aetiologies and failure to respond to previous manage­ment such as dressings, compression and antimicrobials (Conde2015).
EPD is most commonly misdiagnosed as cellulitis, since the clin­ical features such as pustules, suppurative exudate with crusts and erosions, as well as a positive swab result, can be present in both aeti­ologies (Zhou etal.2015). EPD therefore should be considered as a dierential diagnosis of exclusion for patients who have not responded to local or systemic antibiotics for the treatment of sus­pected cellulitis (Zhou etal.2015).
Intervention
The evidence to support best practice in treating EPD is currently lacking and further research to support clinical pathways is needed in this area. There is currently no cure for this condition
本书版权归John Wiley & Sons Inc.所有
Atypical Causes of Leg Ulceration 165
https://t.me/medicina_free
and treatment will depend on accurate and early diagnosis (British Association of Dermatologists2022). Involvement in the appropriate clinical team such as dermatology can assist in devising an appropriate treatment plan (British Association of Dermatologists2022).
Clinical management is aimed at removing the crusts, treating the erosions with topical therapy and allowing them to dry out and heal (British Association of Dermatologists 2022). Removal of the crusts can be done by using a skin cleansing cloth, debridement pad or simple lifting of the scab with forceps. It should not create any pain for the patient. The removal of the scab will release the tell-
tale sign of pus and then the erosion needs to be cleansed. The erosive area can be friable and thus the patient can be positioned forward so as not to cause alarm; any bleeding should stop swiftly and extra care must be taken not to create any skin tears in the atrophied skin. The next step is the application of the topical treatment; this can be prob­lematic on wet erosions, so the practitioner or patient may nd it useful to apply the ointments to the non- adherent dressing rst and then to the limb.
Topical Treatments
High- potency topical steroids have been found to be one of the
most eective treatments (British Association of Dermatolo­gists2022; Nichol etal.2017; Zhou etal.2015).
Topical tacrolimus 0.1% does not cause skin atrophy, unlike cor-
ticosteroids, and is often used in conjunction with corticosteroids or prophylactically to prevent recurrence (Conde2015).
Oral Treatments
Retinoids or zinc supplements can be used (British Association of Dermatologists2022).
Local Wound Care
Initially gentle removal of the crusts and daily dressings with a non­adherent dressing are advised (British Association of Dermatolo­gists2022; Conde2015).
本书版权归John Wiley & Sons Inc.所有
166 ATYPICAL CAUSES OF LEG ULCERATION
https://t.me/medicina_free
Compression Therapy
Compression therapy is recommended to manage the venous insuciency (Wounds UK2016) that is commonly present in EPD. However, it was surmised by Dawn etal. (2003) that continuous use of compression therapy with four­to a potential risk of developing a fungal infection and poor progress of wound healing. Dawn et al. further suggested that patients responded better when intermittent short- stretch bandaging was used as opposed to continuous four- layer bandaging. It has to be recognised, however, that their study is from 2003 and the types of compression therapy available today are more extensive and may not have the same outcomes should a similar study be conducted (refer to Chapter7 for the types of compression available). Indeed, the suggestion was not supported by a more recent study by Nichol etal. (2017), who concluded that compression hosiery was not a contributory factor to poor healing in EPD patients once treatment with topical corticosteroids had been commenced. Nevertheless, careful consideration should be given to the type of compression, as the topical treatments and removal of crusts will initially be required to be undertaken daily and compression bandaging may not be the best option, especially if the patient is willing and able to perform self- care.
layer bandaging could contribute
Patient Self- Care
It is critical to recognise that EPD is often a life- long skin disorder and can be experienced as a recalcitrant condition on the lower leg (Brouard etal. 2002), thus it is imperative that a self- management schedule is instigated as soon as an eective treatment regime is identied. It is unlikely that an eective regime will follow a linear pattern or achieve complete resolution. Therefore, enabling and empowering the patient to manage their care and condition if they are able are important aspects of treating EPD due to its often life­long and recurring nature. Treatment regimens are also required daily both in the early stages of treatment and for prevention of recurrence. Thus visiting a healthcare establishment or waiting for community nursing visits can become arduous and aect the indi­vidual’s quality of life.
本书版权归John Wiley & Sons Inc.所有
Atypical Causes of Leg Ulceration 167
https://t.me/medicina_free
Some considerations and advice for patients with EPD are:
Ensure the patient has an understanding of EPD and treatment
options that are available.
Assess the patient for their willingness and ability to undertake
self- care.
Develop an appropriate treatment plan in collaboration with the
patient (see Box3.1).
Identify red ags and who to contact in the event of any concerns.Organise a follow- up appointment for review with whoever is
overseeing the care of the patient. This should include dermatology.
Once the condition has healed, patients should be given advice
on maintenance of the skin and prevention of recurrence. This may be short term using tacrolimus 0.1% twice a week, emollients
Box 3.1 Self- management of EPD
Skin care should be carried out using debridement cloths or similar to remove scabs and cleanse the erosive areas. Bathing with an emollient should be encouraged.
Help the patient understand what they are experiencing and provide resources such as the British Association of Dermatologists information leaet. This will give the patient condence in their self-
management of the scabs and treatment of the erosions and surrounding skin with the prescribed topical treatments and emollients. They will learn how to respond to any are- ups of the condition.
If oedema is signicant, then use compression bandages, but for a limited period only in order to reduce the oedema:
A moderate dose of compression is often therapeutic for these
conditions.
A nurse- led bandage regime can promote dependency; the
nurse will be providing the skin care and application and in this often recalcitrant condition it can prove dicult to break this pattern of treatment.
本书版权归John Wiley & Sons Inc.所有
168 ATYPICAL CAUSES OF LEG ULCERATION
https://t.me/medicina_free
A self-
management regime is focused on:
Maintaining a skin care regime and removal of scabs.Use of a zinc oxide–impregnated stocking under a compression
liner sock.
A hosiery garment at the prescribed dose of compression.Protection from further sun damage.Self- management of relapses, but swift access to medical
support when required.
and compression hosiery to manage venous insuciency and protecting the skin from further sun damage (British Association of Dermatologists 2022; Conde2015).
Factitious/Artefactual Ulcers andSelf- Harm Wounds
Factitious ulcers, artefactual ulcers or self- harm wounds have been described as ‘The deliberate and conscious production of self- inicted lesions to satisfy an unconscious psychological or emotional need’ (Isoherranen etal. 2019). These wounds can also be referred to as dermatitis artefacta.
These types of wounds can occur on any part of the body that is
easily accessible to the patient. Diagnosis is often dicult, as the patient’s history can be vague and may not always t with the appear­ance of the wound itself (Isoherranen etal.2019). The motivation for patients to cause wounds to themselves can be complex and may be triggered by deep psychological stress. Triggers may include trauma, psychological disorders and sexual or physical abuse (Hunt2017).
History
It can be dicult to obtain an accurate history from the patient, who may be vague about the way the wound occurred (Kilroy- Findley and Bateman 2016). A previous history of multiple attendances to the hospital’s emergency department, and a history of mental illness or psychological trauma, may raise suspicion that the wound is due to
本书版权归John Wiley & Sons Inc.所有
Atypical Causes of Leg Ulceration 169
https://t.me/medicina_free
self- harm (Hunt 2017). If possible, the method of how the wound was caused should be established.
Examination
The more typical features of how self-
harm wounds may present
clinically are as follows:
The wounds may be in areas that are easy for the patient to reach
and uniform in shape.
The appearance of the wound may vary depending on the method
of injury (Figure3.17 indicates continual gouging or scratching of the area).
Infection may be suspected if an unclean implement was used to
cause the injury.
There may be scarring or evidence of previous historical wounds
to surrounding skin.
FIGURE3.17 Leg wounds due to self- harm with continual gouging/
scratching of the area.
本书版权归John Wiley & Sons Inc.所有
170 ATYPICAL CAUSES OF LEG ULCERATION
https://t.me/medicina_free
Investigations
Investigations are not usually required for this type of wound, especially at rst presentation. However, wound infection is a common occurrence of a factitious wound (Kilroy­Bateman2016). The development of wound infection may be linked with how the injury was caused, for instance by unclean instruments or dirty ngernails, environmental factors, or specic patient risk factors for infection, such as diabetes (see Chapter 5 on infection). A wound swab may therefore be helpful to identify the pathogen responsible if the wound is unresponsive to topical antimicrobials or if spreading infection is suspected, as per local guidelines.
Diagnosis
Diagnosis can be challenging, especially if the patient withholds key information on how the wound occurred and their past medical history. Diagnosis is therefore often made after exclusion of other wound aetiologies (Isoherranen etal.2019).
Intervention
A patient’s mental state may inuence their ability to engage with treatment options (Kilroy- Findley and Bateman2016). NICE (2022b) suggests that HCPs dealing with patients who self­familiar with and able to apply the principles of the Mental Capacity Act 2005, Mental Health Act 2007, Care Act 2014 and local safeguarding procedures, should the patient be deemed to be a risk to themselves or others (NICE2022b).
It is important to recognise that a factitious wound is often a sign
that an individual is experiencing psychological distress (NHS Choices2015). The treatment will involve understanding triggers for self- harm and providing a referral for support and guidance. This may be to the local mental health team or one of the many third­sector agencies available, such as Mind (NHS Choices2015). Apatient who self- harms will require the HCP to have empathy and understanding using a non- judgemental approach to gain the patient’s trust (Hunt 2017). An understanding of underlying issues that have triggered the self- harm is essential, as the patient will need the correct psychological support to help prevent reoccurrence.
Findley and
harm should be
本书版权归John Wiley & Sons Inc.所有
Atypical Causes of Leg Ulceration 171
https://t.me/medicina_free
NICE (2022b) suggests that an important part of assisting a patient who self- harms is ensuring that appropriate support and guidance are given and recommends that information giving should be:
Tailored to individual needs and circumstances, taking into
account, for example, whether this is a rst presentation or repeated self- harm, the severity and type of self- harm, and if the person has any co- existing health conditions, neurodevelopmen­tal conditions or a learning disability.
Provided throughout their care.Sensitive and empathetic.Supportive and respectful.Consistent with their care plan, if there is one in place.Conveyed in the spirit of hope and optimism.
It may not be possible to stop an individual from self- harming, therefore management should be centred around reducing harm (Kilroy- Findley and Bateman2016). This may be achieved by provid­ing patient education in the following areas:
How to reduce the potential for a wound to get infected should
the individual feel the need to undertake self- harm, e.g. by using a clean instrument during the process and ensuring that it is performed in a clean environment where possible.
How to recognise the signs of infection and what to do if an
infection is suspected.
How to avoid areas where major blood vessels are present,
reducing the risk of a major bleed.
What to do if a major bleed occurs.Whom to contact when if the individual has any concerns.How to access local mental health services and mental health
support groups.
How to redress the wounds appropriately.
A recommended approach to dressing selection is to follow the principles of moist wound healing with dressings that are acceptable to the patient, and in many cases allow the individual to self- care if they need to self- harm (Hunt2017). Covering wounds with occlusive
本书版权归John Wiley & Sons Inc.所有
Соседние файлы в папке @xirurgi_2025