Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / @xirurgi_2025 / @xirurgi_2025 - 393 - файл

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
45 Мб
Скачать
282 ASSESSMENT OF LEG ULCERATION
https://t.me/medicina_free
Salomé, G. (2020). Body image of people with venous ulcers. Journal of Con-
temporary Nursing 9 (2): 225–230. https://doi.org/10.17267/2317-
3378rec.v9i2.2930. Salomé, G.M., de Almeida, S.A., de Jesus Pereira, M.T. et al. (2016). The
impact of venous leg ulcers on body image and self-
Skin & Wound Care 29 (7): 316–321. https://doi.org/10.1097/
01.asw.0000484243.32091.0c.
Seitz, C.S., Berens, N., Brocker, E.B., and Trautmann, A. (2010). Leg ulcera-
tion in rheumatoid arthritis–an underreported multicausal complica-
tion with considerable morbidity: analysis of thirty-
review of the literature. Dermatology 220 (3): 268–273. https://doi.
org/10.1159/000284583. Sharpe, A., Dowsett, C., Welch, D. et al., (2022). Wound preparation by
cleansing and debridement using Alprep® Pad. Wounds UK. https://wounds-
uk.com/best- practice- statements/wound- preparation- by- cleansing-
and-
debridement- using- alprep- pad
Smith, D., Team, V., Barber, G. etal. (2018). Factors associated with physical
activity levels in people with venous leg ulcers: a multicentre,
prospective, cohort study. International Wound Journal 15 (2): 291–296.
https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.12868. Staines, K. (2018). Safe compression and accurate ABPI– overcoming barri-
ers. Wounds UK 14 (1): 64–67. Steven, L., Hill, K., Williams, D. etal. (2012). A review of the scientic evi-
dence for biolms in wounds. Wound repair and regeneration. Wound
Repair and Regeneration 20: 647–657. Stoodley, P., Sauer, K., Davies, D.G., and Costerton, J.W. (2002).
complex dierentiated communities. Annual Review of Microbiology 56:
187–209. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.micro.56.012302.160705. Suehiro, K., Morikage, N., Murakami, M. etal. (2014). A study of leg edema
in immobile patients. Circulation Journal 78 (7): 1733–1739. https://doi.
org/10.1253/circj.cj- 13- 1599. Tavadia, S., Bianchi, J., Dawe, R.S. etal. (2003). Allergic contact dermatitis in
venous leg ulcer patients. Contact Dermatitis 48 (5): 261–265. Taylor, K.J. and Holland, S. (1990). Doppler US. Part I. Basic principles,
instrumentation, and pitfalls. Radiology 174 (2): 297–307. https://doi.
org/10.1148/radiology.174.2.2404309. Theochari, C.A., Theochari, N.A., Mylonas, K.S. etal. (2022). Venous throm-
boembolism following major abdominal surgery for cancer: aguide for
the surgical intern. Current Pharmaceutical Design 28 (10): 787–797.
https://doi.org/10.2174/1381612828666220217140639. Thomson, L. (2016). Sclerotherapy of telangiectasias or spider veins in the
lower limb: a review. Journal of Vascular Nursing 34 (2): 61–62. Tummala, S. and Scherbel, D. (2018). Clinical assessment of peripheral arte-
rial disease in the oce: what do the guidelines say? Seminars in Inter-
ventional Radiology 35 (5): 365–377.
esteem. Advances in
six patients and
Biolms as
本书版权归John Wiley & Sons Inc.所有
Assessment of Leg Ulceration 283
https://t.me/medicina_free
Upton, D., Andrews, A., and Upton, P. (2014). Venous leg ulcers: what about
being? Journal of Wound Care 23 (1): 14–17. https://doi.org/
well-
10.12968/jowc.2014.23.1.14.
Van Rij, A.M., De Alwis, C.S., Jiang, P. etal. (2008). Obesity and impaired
venous function. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 35 (6): 739–744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2008.01.006.
Vascular Society for Great Britain and Ireland (2023) Lymphoedema and
limb swelling. https://www.vascularsociety.org.uk/patients/ conditions/ 1/lymphoedema_and_limb_swelling
Vowden, P. and Vowden, K. (2018). The importance of accurate methodology
in ABPI calculation when assessing lower limb wounds. British Journal of Community Nursing 23 (Sup3): S16–S21. https://doi.org/10.12968/ bjcn.2018.23.Sup3.S16.
Vuolo, J. (2010). Hypergranulation: exploring possible management options.
British Journal of Nursing Tissue Viability 19 (Suppl. 2): S4–S8.
Walburn, J., Weinman, J., Norton, S. etal. (2017). Stress, illness perceptions,
behaviors, and healing in venous leg ulcers: ndings from a prospective observational study. Psychosomatic Medicine 79 (5): 585–592. https:// doi.org/10.1097/psy.0000000000000436.
Wang, X.-
Wang, W., Zhao, T., Geng, K. etal. (2021). Smoking and the pathophysiology
Whayman, N. (2014) ‘Doppler assessment: getting it right’, Wounds UK.
Wilson, M. (2012). Understanding the basics of wound assessment. Wound
Winter, G.D. (1962). Formation of the scab and the rate of epithelialisation of
Winterborn, R.J., Foy, C., and Earnshaw, J.J. (2004). Causes of varicose vein
Wittens, C., Davies, A.H., Baekgaard, N. etal. (2015). Editor’s choice– man-
Woelk, C.J. (2012). Management of critical limb ischemia. Canadian Family
World Union of Wound Healing Societies (2007). Wound Exudate and the
H., Leineweber, C., Kirkeeide, R. etal. (2006). Psychosocial stress and atherosclerosis: family and work stress accelerate the progression of coronary disease in women. The Stockholm Female Coronary Angiog­raphy study. Journal of Internal Medicine 261 (3): 245–254.
of peripheral artery disease. Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine 8:
704106. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.704106.
https://wounds- uk.com/wound- essentials/doppler- assessmentgett ing- it- right
Essentials 7 (2): 8–12.
supercial wounds in the skin of domestic pig. Nature 193: 293–294.
recurrence: late results of a randomized controlled trial of stripping the long saphenous vein. Journal of Vascular Surgery 40 (4): 634–639.
agement of chronic venous disease: clinical practice guidelines of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS). European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 49 (6): 678–737. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2015.02.007.
Physician/Le médecin de famille canadien 58 (9): 960–963.
Role of Dressings: A Consensus Document. London: MEP.
本书版权归John Wiley & Sons Inc.所有
284 ASSESSMENT OF LEG ULCERATION
https://t.me/medicina_free
Wounds UK (2013). Best practice statement: eective exudate management.
https://wounds­statement-
Wounds UK (2016). Quick guide: Management of hyperkeratosis of the
lower limb. https://www.wounds­guide-
management- of- hyperkeratosis- of- the- lower- limb
Wounds UK (2019a). Best practice statement: Ankle brachial pressure index
(ABPI) in practice. https://wounds- uk.com/best- practice- statements/
brachial- pressure- index- abpi- practice
ankle-
Wounds UK (2019b). Best practice statement: Addressing complexities in the
management of venous legs ulcers. https://wounds- uk.com/best- practice­leg-
Wounds UK (2020). Best practice statement: Management of lower limb skin
tears in adults. https://wounds- uk.com/best- practice- statements/ management-
Wounds UK (2021). Best practice statement: Addressing skin tone bias in
wound care: assessing signs and symptoms in people with dark skin tones. https://wounds­tone­skin-
Wounds UK (2022). Best practice statement: Holistic management of venous
leg ulceration. https://www.wounds- uk.com/resources/details/holistic­ management- venous- leg- ulceration- second- edition
Young, T. (2015). Unit 5. How to undertake a doppler ultrasound. Practice
Nursing 22 (11): 1–4.
Young, T. (2020). Leg ulceration in sickleell disease. Wounds UK 16 (1):
72–77.
Zegarra, T. and Tadi, P. (2022). CEAP classication of venous disorders. In:
StatPearls. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing https://www. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK557410/.
Zemaitis, M., Boll, J., and Dreyer, M. (2022). Peripheral Arterial Disease.
Bethesda, MD: National Library of Medicine.
statements/addressing- complexities- management- venous-
ulcers
bias- wound- care- assessing- signs- and- symptoms- people- dark-
tones.
uk.com/best- practice- statements/best- practice-
eective- exudate- management.
uk.com/resources/details/quick-
lower- limb- skin- tears- adults.
uk.com/best- practice- statements/addressing- skin-
本书版权归John Wiley & Sons Inc.所有
CHAPTER
https://t.me/medicina_free
6
Holistic Management ofPain
FRAN WORBOYS AND ALISON HOPKINS
ain is a common feature of all types of leg ulceration and lower
P
limb swelling. It is essential that pain as a symptom is understood and that the complexities of managing this common side eect are recognised. Pain is more than a physical response to a stimulus and the clinician needs to understand and manage the associated psychological features that may exacerbate or diminish the pain sensations. It is critical that a plan to address these aspects includes more than analgesia: that the clinician prioritises understanding of the patient’s lived experience of their pain so that the underlying features of the pain cycle are included in the treatment plan. The clinician needs to understand the various theories relating to pain, the dierent types of pain and factors that have an impact on the pain experience, which will inform their understanding of the phenomenon of pain. Myths associated with the pain experience will be addressed in this chapter.
THE PAIN EXPERIENCE
Pain is a signicant common experience as well as the most devastating aspect related to living with non- healing wounds (Woo et al.2008; Price et al. 2008) and, reportedly, the worst aspect of having a leg ulcer (Briggs etal.2012).
Lower Limb and Leg Ulcer Assessment and Management, First Edition. Edited by Aby Mitchell, Georgina Ritchie, and Alison Hopkins. © 2024 John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Published 2024 by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
本书版权归John Wiley & Sons Inc.所有
285
286 HOLISTIC MANAGEMENT OF PAIN
https://t.me/medicina_free
The International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) denes pain as ‘an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with, or resembling that associated with, actual or potential tissue damage’ (Raja etal.2020). This is useful in framing the nature of pain beyond the physical domain, while raising further questions about how pain is perceived and in what way it relates to tissue injury. However, it does not entirely do justice to the complexity of the pain experience and what it means to live with pain.
There have been numerous qualitative studies that have sought to nd a deeper understanding of what pain is and how it aects lives. A number of these have focused on patients living with leg ulcers and the personal narratives have been able to enhance understanding of the character of non­lives caught up in an endless pain narrative (Walshe 1995; Krasner1998; Rosenburg etal.2022).
Pain has been found to dominate the lives of people with leg ulcers (Green et al.2017), with participants describing the pain as ‘unceasing [in] nature, severity and timing, especially through the night’. In a study looking at a specic wound dressing on chronic venous leg ulcer patients, pain was termed as unrelenting with persistent wound pain uctuating over a 24- hour period, alongside intermittent bursts of spontaneous pain (Flanagan etal.2006). Key themes included unpredictability and the challenge of living with fatigue and activity restrictions.
Leren etal. (2020) in their review conclude that pain is a ‘serious problem for patients’ and that the issues that subsequently ow from unresolved pain are signicant and disrupt the lives of the patient and their families. People with leg ulcers have a signicant risk of their pain becoming long- standing and persistent, with ‘chronic pain, insomnia, depression and suicidal ideation being inextricably linked’ (Taverner et al. 2014). Clinicians need to be vigilant from the rst assessment, as much suering can be reduced if patients’ stories are listened to and eective management is put into place from the outset.
Clinicians need to be aware of the impact that pain has on their patients, but there has been concern that practitioners have either not understood its impact or have placed a low importance on pain management (EWMA2002; Price etal.2007; Taverner etal.2011). Arecent Australian study (Frescos2018) assessing pain in chronic wounds found that although almost all wound care practitioners
healing and the complexity of
本书版权归John Wiley & Sons Inc.所有
Holistic Management of Pain 287
https://t.me/medicina_free
participating in the study (n = 1298) asked patients about their wound pain experience, this reduced to 38% when considering how many assessed wound pain at every consultation/dressing change. Pain is a common feature experienced by leg ulcer patients and so its presence and impact need to be the concern of practitioners.
Pain has been described as being ‘whatever the experiencing person says it is, existing whenever the experiencing person says it does’ (McCaery1968), yet if practitioners do not assess, review and ask the questions, this cannot be ascertained. Pain is also as much about what the patient does not say (WUWHS2004) as what they do, and this requires patience, observation, perception and understanding to facilitate awareness. The recognition of pain and how it is to be managed form part of the therapeutic partnership and the overall healing outcomes that practitioners need to have with patients.
THEORIES OFPAIN
Pain Theory Evolution
Numerous theories have sought to explain the physiological processes behind the pain experience, with the ancient Greeks being the rst to discover the nervous system. Pain theory in its simplest form postulated that if there was a linear progression between the point of trauma or injury and the sensation experienced, it would associate cause with eect, which could be related to expectation. Skuse (2021) describes how, in the seventeenth century, Descartes proposed a theory of pain that articulated the idea that pain was located in thebrain, with nerves being responsible for stimulating a response. The rationale arose out of Descartes’ study of phantom limb pain andthe observation that pain was being experienced from a site that was no longer part of the body. In his bell- cord theory he identied a link between an injury and the pain experienced, such that a signal is sent to the brain and it reacts like the ringing of a bell. This simple model was suggestive of a pain pathway, but it did little to explain the complexities and nuances of the pain experience, where the injury might be the same but the pain narratives between dierent people in similar situations or the same person in another setting could be poles apart.
本书版权归John Wiley & Sons Inc.所有
288 HOLISTIC MANAGEMENT OF PAIN
https://t.me/medicina_free
In the nineteenth century the physiology of the nerves was revealed, with dierentiation between the cell body, the dendrite and the axon. The work of individuals such as Charles Bell, Otto Deiters who saw the nervous system as a railroad (Ehrlich2022), Emil du Bois-
Reymond and his identication of nerve impulses, C.S. Sherrington and Jean- Martin Charcot brought a new dimension of understanding about nerves, the nervous system and the way impulses travel to the brain. Sherrington discovered that nerves do not touch one another but communicate by ‘synapse’ across a small space to the next one, due to chemical and electrical exchanges. This forms the neural circuitry within the body. Sherrington also identied the specialised receptors at the end of nerves that detect motor and sensory activity while linking nerves to muscle activity. These receptors, known as nociceptors, detect damage and danger by reacting to noxious stimuli (mechanical, thermal and chemical). They send electro- chemical impulses along the peripheral sensory nerve towards the spinal cord and from there to the brain (Molnár and Brown2010).
In the twentieth century, the study of the nervous system continued with what is termed modern brain science. The work of Santiago Ramón y Cajal identied individual cells that are now known as neurons (Ehrlich2022). The continued discoveries within the elds of neurology and neuroscience are the backdrop for theories of pain that have since developed. These models have evolved alongside our understanding of psychology, including emotions and belief systems, the body, and people’s relationships to one another, their environment and the world.
Gate Theory
One of the most inuential pain theories has been work by Melzack and Walls (1965; Katz and Rosenbloom2015), which introduced the concept of a gate mechanism within the nervous system that had the ability to select the pain impulses travelling to the brain. They proposed that nociceptive pain signals are transmitted from the peripheral nervous system to the brain, where a pain response is elicited. A specialised group of cells within the spinal cord functions as a gate, enabling these impulses to be either allowed or blocked from travelling to the brain. Where the gate is open pain is experienced,
本书版权归John Wiley & Sons Inc.所有
Holistic Management of Pain 289
https://t.me/medicina_free
TABLE6.1 
Opens the gate Anxiety
Closes the gate Happiness
Source: Adapted from Upton and Upton (2015).
Gate theory andinuences.
Cognitive and
Emotional
Worry Tension Depression
Optimism Relaxation
behavioural Physical
Focusing on the pain Boredom Other reactions
More involvement and
interest in life’s activities
Distractions or focus
on other activities
Other reactions
Extent and
type of injury
Low- level
activity Medication Counter-
stimulation,
e.g. rubbing
but where the gate is closed there is less pain. Pain signals are thereby modulated, with specic inuences for deciding whether this gate should be open or shut being multivariant, and having as much to do with emotional, psychological and environmental factors as with the injury or disease process itself. See Table6.1.
The theory has helped with understanding the function of the dierent nerve bres (Melzack1996). The small peripheral nerve bres directly communicate damage, with noxious stimuli opening the gate, whereas activation of the large peripheral bres can mediate to close the gate. Non-
painful sensations such as massaging, rubbing around an area or the application of heat may have a soothing eect, because in these instances the large peripheral bres are being activated, inhibiting other pain signals (Upton and Upton2015).
This theory has enabled insights into nursing the patient in pain. It has assisted with understanding some of the inuences that determine pain from a physiological perspective, but also in considering the challenges and variables relating to pain manage­ment. Despite this, the theory continued to emphasise the presence of a pathway to dene the nature and experience of pain, which meant that persistent pain was not so easily addressed within this model.
本书版权归John Wiley & Sons Inc.所有
290 HOLISTIC MANAGEMENT OF PAIN
https://t.me/medicina_free
Biopsychosocial Model
With the development of successive theories and associated research, it has become increasingly recognised that pain does not equate with injury. Theories around pain and what contributes to the pain narrative have increasingly sought to understand the complexity of the experience. This has led to the recognition of the biopsychosocial model as the most comprehensive and accepted model to date, with pain now accepted as a biopsychosocial phenomenon and essential in understanding the pain experience (Upton and Solowiej 2010; Dueñas etal.2016).
This model emphasises the dynamic relationship between the biological, social and psychological domains of a person’s life. As there is no single pain centre in the brain, dierent parts are activated according to the stimuli. These stimuli are always individually perceived and experienced, being inuenced by the biopsychosocial variables. This is termed the neurosignature (Lyman 2021) and is unique to each person. Within this model the phenomenon of pain will include:
Sensory aspects, as the brain seeks to determine where the danger
is coming from. This will include pathophysiological causes such as wound aetiology, prolonged inammation, hypersensitivities, venous insuciencies, local infection and pressure from neo­plasms (Hollinworth2005) as well as ischaemia and dermatitis (Briggs etal.2012), odour and exudate (Phillips etal.2018). The release of inammatory molecules as part of the immune response will contribute to inammatory processes and the further sensitisation of nerves (Zhang and An2007).
Psychological, where the brain decides that the stimuli is a threat.Emotional responses, such as moods, anxiety, depression, fear
and stress. See Table6.2.
Cognitive components, involving our memories, thoughts and
beliefs, which will include cultural backgrounds and religious thinking, although these must not be used to infer stereotypes. Beliefs also relate to self- ecacy and the extent to which people believe that they can cope with pain, as well as to expectations. These are important determinants within the therapeutic relationship and in being able to tolerate pain.
本书版权归John Wiley & Sons Inc.所有
TABLE6.2 Impact ofpain onthe person.
https://t.me/medicina_free
Eect of excessive pain
Stress Woo (2010) Upton and
Solowiej (2010)
Wynn and
Holloway (2019)
Anxiety Colloca and
Beneddetti (2007)
Woo (2015)
Fear Dueñas etal. (2016)
Lack of sleep Upton and
Andrews (2013) Green etal. (2017) Negative emotions
and moods, feeling
threatened, lack of
control,
helplessness Bair etal. (2003) Woo etal. (2008) Ballantyne and
Sullivan (2015) Dueñas etal. (2016)
Pain is a major source of stress leading to:
Delayed healing.Increased activity on the body’s immune and
hormonal systems, which raises the peripheral immune response, increasing sensitivity to pain and amplifying chronic stress.
Driving of inammation, prolonging the
inammatory phase of wound healing, which increases pain and contributes to non- healing.
Pain is a major source of anxiety leading to:
More anxiety being experienced.Nocebo eect: heightened anxiety in the
anticipation of pain giving higher ratings to the pain experience and self- reported pain intensity.
Increased sensitivity to pain: lower pain
threshold and tolerance.
Predictor of procedural pain: increased
related pain at dressings and
wound­between changes.
Delayed healing: impact of inammatory
mediators. Drives inammation that increases pain.
Cycle of pain, stress, worsened pain and delayed
wound healing.
Increases the peripheral immune response,
increasing sensitivity to pain.
Can become a self- fullling prophesy as the
brain’s alarm system is elevated.
Combined with anxiety amplies to the brain
that all is not well.
Causes inammation, which increases pain.Debilitates and adds to the pain cycle.Lack of sleep can contribute to increased pain.
Can worsen short- term pain, which may
transition into long- term pain.
Pain is rated as more intense.
本书版权归John Wiley & Sons Inc.所有
Соседние файлы в папке @xirurgi_2025