Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / @xirurgi_2025 / @xirurgi_2025 - 391 - файл

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
45 Мб
Скачать
54
https://t.me/medicina_free
C. Parolo et al.
Fig. 5.5 Static splint
splint is used (Fig. 5.5), while for irreducible ones (type IB) a dynamic splint in extension with circular base module, wrist included and Levame type bar as dynamic tractions is custom made (Fig.5.6). It is very important that the splint is worn correctly. The splint in PIP extension must have dorsal closure stabilizing the V metacarpal very well and positioning the MPJ at about 50° of exion. In fact, in addition to the bending stiff­ness of the PIPJ, there is often a compensatory attitude in hypertension of the MPJ Furthermore, the dynamic bar must pull the middle phalanx on the proximal phalanx by means of a velcro ring with a perfectly perpendicular force.
The difculty of realization is linked to the complexity of the orthosis and the size of the fth nger of a child (or a newborn). The splint is
Fig. 5.6 Dynamic splint
often worn from the early months of life and used during the night and during the afternoon nap.
The initial choice of the type of splint is there­fore not a denitive choice. A type IB campto­dactyly may become reducible after a few months of treatment with the use of a dynamic splint and therefore a static type will be chosen. During development stiffness may recurr and a dynamic splint should be applied again.
5.6 Surgical Technique
A volar linear incision is used and converted to multiple z-plasties, placing the central limbs over the exion creases of the joints. On reecting the skin, the shortened retinaculum is visualized; it is released, including the bony attachment of Grayson’s ligaments. At this stage, the lateral
5 Camptodactyly
https://t.me/medicina_free
bands of the intrinsic apparatus and interosseous muscles are freed from their abnormal and wide­spread attachment to the sides of the proximal phalanx. It is this attachment that prevents the extension of the PIP joint. On its release, proxi­mal pull on the lateral bands will conrm that PIP extension can now occur. Some attenuation of the central slip may have occurred and is probably secondary, as in other forms of prolonged PIP joint contracture. Its presence can be conrmed by the central slip tenodesis test. It involves ex­ing the wrist and the MP joints. In the normal hand, the PIP joint will automatically fully extend, owing to tension on the central slip inser­tion. If the central slip is attenuated, there will be an extensor lag at the PIP joint. In such patients, the central slip can be treated by appropriate postoperative splinting. The lumbrical muscle is abnormally inserted and often adherent to the proximal phalanx. It may also have an abnormal origin and occasionally may be inserted into the FDS tendon proximal to the A1 pulley. The FDS tendon is tested by a tenodesis test to ascertain whether it is short. If the PIP joint cannot be fully extended when the wrist is in extension, the FDS is short and must be released. Two types of FDS abnormalities exist: (1) one in which the FDS is merely short, and (2) the other in which only the distal portion of the FDS is present, there is prox­imal aplasia, and the distal part of the FDS acts as a tenodesis, producing a exion contracture of the PIP joint. In such cases, complete surgical release by division is undertaken. A small minor­ity may require release of the exor tendon sheath, volar plate or even the accessory collat­eral ligaments. The central slip attenuation responds to postoperative extension splinting.
From 2002 to 2018, we have treated 54 patients and 88 ngers affected by camptodactyly.
In total, 59 ngers were affected by the exi­ble form. Twentynine ngers were affected by the rigid form.
A total of 85 ngers underwent conservative treatment (59 exible and 26 xed).
55
Fig. 5.7 Pre-op
Fig. 5.8 Post-op
Among this series, 67 ngers concluded the conservative treatment with success (56 with no lack of extension—excellent result; 11 ngers with an extensor lag minor than 20°—good result) (Figs. 5.7 and 5.8). Conservative treat­ment failed in 18 ngers (lag of extension major than 20°). Ten ngers (seven from the conserva­tive group plus three from the xed group never treated with splinting) underwent surgery with a lag of extension of more than 40°.
Results were excellent in two digits (no lag of extension), good in three (lag of extension less than 20° and poor in ve (lag of extension more than 20°) (Table5.3).
In all of our series, there was an improvement after treatment and the quality of results depended upon the severity of the contracture and protocol compliance.
The conservative approach leads to gains in function. Hand therapy and custom-made splint­ing are essential to obtain and maintain improve­ment of passive extension and to regain active extension both in conservative and surgical treat­ment. Continuous monitoring, constant use of splints and manipulation are important to main­tain the achieved results.
56
Results
https://t.me/medicina_free
Table 5.3 Results of treatment
C. Parolo et al.
-at least 1y follow up-
Flexible form -59 fingers-
Rigid form -29 fingers-
2 fingers Excellent result Almost complete AROM
Just conservative treatment All with good results
26 fingers conservative treatment
8 fingers
Good result Extension lag < 20*
3 fingers direct
surgical treatment Extension lag > 40*
All had benefits in gains of extension and correction of
the deformity, in most cases with reduced AROM
Further Reading
Courtemanche AD.Campylodactyly: etiology and man-
agement. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1969;44:451–4. Dautel G.Camptodactylies. Chir Main. 2003;22:115–24. De Haas WHD. Camptodactylie Nederlands tijdschr
Geneesk. 1957;101:2121–4. Dofn G, Lenoble E, Foucher G, etal. Camptodactylie:
classication et résultats thérapeutiques. Ann Chir
Main (Ann Hand Surg). 1994;13(1):20–5. Engber WD, Flatt AE. Camptodactyly: an analysis of
sixty-six patients and twenty-four operations. J Hand
Surg. 1977;2:216–24. Gupta A, Burke FD.Correction of camptodactyly. J.Hand
Surg. 1990;15B:168–70. Hori M, Nakamura R, Inoue G, et al. Nonoperative
treatment of camptodactyly. J Hand Surg.
1987a;12A:1061–5. Inoue G, Tamura Y. Camptodactyly resulting from para-
doxical action of an anomalous lumbrical muscle.
Scand J Plast Reconstr Hand Surg. 1994;28:309–12. Koman LA, Toby EB, Poehling GG. Congenital exion
deformities of the proximal interphalangeal joint in
children: a subgroup of camptodactyly. J Hand Surg.
1990;15A:582–6. Maeda M, Matsui T.Camptodactyly caused by an abnor-
mal lumbrical muscle. J Hand Surg. 1985;10B:95–6.
56 fingers Excellent result Extension lag
3 fingers Good result Extension lag < 20*
18 fingers
Poor results Extension lag > 20*
7 fingers Surgery Extension lag > 40º
3 fingers Good result Extension lag < 20*
5 fingers “Poor” result Extension lag > 20*
McCash C.Congenital contractures of the hand. In: Stack
HG, Botton H, editors. The proceedings of the Second Hand Club, British Society for Surgery of the Hand. London; 1975. p.399–401.
McFarlane RM, Curry GI. Evans HBAnomalies of the
intrinsic muscles in camptodactyly. J Hand Surg. 1983;8:531–44.
McFarlane RM, Classen DA, Porte AM, Botz JS. The
anatomy and treatment of camptodactyly of the small nger. J Hand Surg. 1992;17A:35–44.
Minami A, Sakai T. Camptodactyly caused by abnormal
insetion and orgin of lumbrical muscle. J Hand Surg. 1993;18B:310–1.
Miura T.Nontraumatic exion deformity of the proximal
interphalangeal joint: its pathogenesis and treatment. Hand. 1983;15:25–34.
Miura T, Nakamura R, Tamura Y.Long-standing extended
dynamic splintage and release of an abnormal restraining structure in camptodactyly. J Hand Surg. 1992;17B:665–72.
Miura T, Nackamura R, Tamura Y. Long standing
Extended Dynamic splintage and release of an abnor­mal restraining structure in camptodactyly. J Hand Surg Br. 1992;17B:665–72.
Ogino T, Kato H.Operative ndings in camptodactyly of
the little nger. J Hand Surg. 1992;17B:661–4.
Oldeld MD. Camptodactyly: exor contracture of the
ngers in young girls. Br J Plast Surg. 1956;8:312–7.
5 Camptodactyly
https://t.me/medicina_free
57
Scott J.Hammer nger with notes of seven cases occuring
in one family. Glasgow Med J. 1903;60:335–44. Siegert JJ, Cooney WP, Dobyns JH.Management of sim-
ple camptodactyly. J Hand Surg. 1990;15B:181–9. Siegert JJ, Cooney WP, Dobyns JH.Management of sim-
ple camptodactyly. J Hand Surg Br. 1990;15B:181–9. Smith PJ.Ross DAThe central slip tenodesis test for early
diagnosis of potential Boutonniere deformities. J
Hand Surg. 1994;19B:88–90.
Smith RJ, Kaplan EB.Camptodactyly and similar atrau-
matic exion deformities of the proximal interphalan­geal joints of the ngers: a study of thirty- one cases. J Bone Joint Surg. 1968;50A:1187–203.
Stoddard EE. Nomenclature of hereditary crooked n-
gers: Streblomicrodatyly and camptodactyly—are they synonyms? J Hered. 1939;30:511–2.
Todd AH. Hereditary contracture of the little ngers
(Kamptodactyly). Lancet. 1929;2:1088–9.
Syndactyly
https://t.me/medicina_free
DanielM.Weber
6
Abstract
Syndactyly is a common hand anomaly that
affects 1 in 2000–3000 live births. It has a
spectrum from simple syndactylies with
fusion of the skin and soft tissues only, com-
plex syndactylies with fusion of bones and
nails to complicated syndactylies which are
often associated with syndromes.
This chapter covers the epidemiology, clas­sication, and diagnostic workup of syndacty­lies. It presents treatment strategies for surgical corrections of syndactylies, including techniques with skin grafts, without skin grafts, and with skin substitutes.
Keywords
Syndactyly · Child · Hand · Surgery · Release
6.1 Introduction
Syndactyly is a congenital limb anomaly that is characterized by an incomplete separation of dig­its, caused by abnormal interdigital connections. The term is derived from the Greek words syn, meaning together and dactylos, meaning digit.
D. M. Weber (*) Division of Hand Surgery, Department of Pediatric Surgery, University Children’s Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland e-mail: Daniel.Weber@kispi.uzh.ch
6.2 Epidemiology
Syndactylies are among the most common hand anomalies, with an estimated incidence of 1 in 2000–3000 live births, affecting both hands in 50%. Ten to 40% have a positive family history with a clear male predominance.
The basic principles of segmentation of the hand are fairly well understood. The apical ecto­dermal ridge controls the proximodistal out­growth of the limb, whereas the development and differentiation along the radio-ulnar axis are con­trolled by the zone of polarizing activity (ZPA). The ZPA and the AER work in a close feedback loop, resulting in a hand plate that becomes visi­ble in the fth week of development. During the elongation process, digits form through conden­sation, whereas tissues in between are removed by apoptosis in a distal to proximal orientation. Only a perfect equilibrium between the Bone Morphogenic Proteins (BMPs) that suppress broblast growth factors (FGFs), thereby induc­ing apoptosis, and the BMP inhibitors enable a normal development. Interference with or muta­tions of BMPs, FGFs, and BMP inhibitors sup­press controlled apoptosis and can therefore induce syndactylies, sometimes associated with polydactylies or synostoses [1, 2].
There are over 300 known syndromic anom­alies causing syndactylies with etiologies that remain poorly understood, mainly due to their phenotypic and genetic diversity. Within fami-
© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023 G. Pajardi (ed.), Pediatric Hand Surgery, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30984-7_6
59
60
https://t.me/medicina_free
D. M. Weber
lies and even individuals, phenotypes may be severe or mild, unilateral or bilateral, and affect both or either hands and feet [1]. Geneticists classify syndactylies on Temtamy and McKusick’s system which has been extended to nine non- syndromic forms of syn­dactylies, seven of them with autosomal domi­nant inheritance, variable expressivity and incomplete penetrance and two autosomal recessive forms. Syndactyly type I is the most common non-syndromic syndactyly, usually affecting the third web space on the hands and the second web space on the feet. The most common subtype 1 has been associated with the locus 3p21.31 but no disease-causing genes have been identied [1].
6.3 Classication
Simple clinical classications help surgical plan­ning. The differentiation into complete syndac- tyly includes the ngertips and partial syndactyly with a web space that can reach anywhere
between a normal web space and the ngertips can describe all forms of syndactyly. Furthermore, syndactylies can be classied into simple syndac­tylies, complex syndactylies, and complex com­plicated syndactylies (Fig. 6.1). Simple syndactylies are characterized by only cutaneous and soft tissue fusions of the ngers and well­developed, separated ngernails. Usually, the segmentation of the digits, tendons, and pulleys is normal with occasional distalisation of the bifurcation of the neurovascular bundles. Complex syndactylies involve the nail and osse­ous phalanges and may be associated with seg­mentation anomalies of tendons and a distalisation of the bifurcation of the neurovascular bundles. Complex complicated syndactylies have a severely disturbed anatomy not only of the osse­ous elements but also of the neurovascular bun­dles and musculotendinous structures. They are often associated with syndromes, such as in Apert’s syndrome.
As mentioned above, some geneticists and pediatricians adhere to the classication which is based on Temtamy and McKusick.
ab
cd
6 Syndactyly
https://t.me/medicina_free
61
Simple, incomplete
Simple, complete
Complex Complicated
Fig. 6.1 Classication of syndactylies: (a) Simple, incomplete; (b) Simple, complete; (c) Complex; (d) Complicated. (From Upton J: Management of disorders of
separation-syndactyly. In: Hentz VR, editor. The hand and upper lim (Part2) in: Mathes SJ, editor. Plastic surgery vol. 8. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier; 2006. P. 140)
62
https://t.me/medicina_free
D. M. Weber
6.4 Diagnostic Workup
Simple syndactylies of the ngers with a full mobility of the IP joints don’t need a further workup, since a regular anatomy of tendons and neurovascular bundles can be anticipated.
Fig. 6.2 The X-ray reveals the complexity of this complete, complex, complicated syndactyly in a child with a synpolydactyly
However, if in doubt, an X-ray is recommended, because the complexity can be underestimated as illustrated in Fig.6.2 with a patient with a famil­ial synpolydactyly. A pediatric or genetic workup is recommended for complicated syndactylies and can be considered in complex syndactylies.
6 Syndactyly
https://t.me/medicina_free
6.5 Treatment
The aim of surgical separation of web spaces is improving or maintaining function while opti­mizing the appearance of the hand by separating all digits.
6.5.1 General Principles
Irrespective of the localization and type of the syndactyly, some principles of reconstruction must be respected.
6.5.1.1 Flap Coverage oftheWeb
The proximal denition of the web should be covered with a wide, well-vascularized ap to avoid scar formation and “web creep”, a second­ary syndactyly that narrows or distalizes the new commissure. The width of the ap should ensure a round conguration and avoid a V-shaped web space. Dorsally based aps can be mobilized eas­ily since they have hardly any fascio-cutaneous adherence and have the advantage of bringing pigmented skin to the dorsal and well-visible aspect of the web space. Ideally, they mimic the natural proximal to distal and dorsal to palmar inclination of the web.
6.5.1.2 Skin Grafts andSubstitutes
There is a shortage of interdigital skin when sep­arating syndactylies. This becomes evident on a hand drawn sketch and can be explained and demonstrated to parents easily (Fig.6.3). Various ap designs have been recommended to separate partial and complete syndactylies without skin grafts. Partial syndactylies up to the PIP joint can be separated reliably without using skin grafts or substitutes [3] (technique see below), whereas separation of complete syndactylies without skin grafts may be associated with higher risks of complications and a less favorable outcome.
Large skin defects on the hand result in scars that retract and may distort the neighboring skin aps. Exceptionally, skin defects may be toler­ated in stiff ngers, when contractures are not an issue, such as in Apert’s hands with symphal­angism. Traditionally, skin defects are covered
63
Fig. 6.3 A simple hand-drawn sketch illustrates to par­ents the shortage of skin
with autologous skin grafts. Full-thickness skin grafts are preferred over split skin grafts, because they hardly shrink. The pigmentation, texture, and hair bearing of the donor skin must match the recipient site on the hand and the donor site must be inconspicuous. Traditionally, full-thickness skin grafts are taken from the ulnar volar aspect of the wrist, the cubital fossa, or the groin. It is important to remember that the skin from the groin may grow pubic hair after puberty, particularly when being taken medially.
An excellent donor site that is not used com­monly is retroauricular skin (Fig.6.4). It is hardly hair bearing and has a superior color match when compared with groin skin (Fig. 6.5) [4]. The ellipsoid incisions should be marked with a pen so that 1/3 of the skin is taken from the ear. Injection of a local anesthetic with a vasocon­strictor (such as bupivacaine+adrenaline) facili­tates harvesting of the skin graft. After a two-layer wound closure with resorbable subcutaneous and intracutaneous sutures, a light dressing may be applied for a day or two. Experienced surgeons may harvest the retroauricular skin graft before operating on the hand to minimize tourniquet time and avoid leaving the draped hand to raise a skin graft.
64
https://t.me/medicina_free
D. M. Weber
Fig. 6.4 Full-thickness retroauricular skin graft
Dermal substitutes or a hyaluronic scaffold can be used as an alternative to skin grafts. It shortens operating time and avoids donor site scars. Application by suture xation is easy and spontaneous resorption of the hyaluronic acid is followed by spontaneous epithelialization with a good color match (Fig.6.6). Good results were published [5]; however, no studies have com­pared the results of skin substitutes with skin grafts.
6.5.1.3 Fingertip andNail Wall
Reconstruction
Complete complex and complete complicated syndactylies often have fused nails and therefore lack a lateral nail fold. Spontaneous scarication of the nail fold or scarication after application of full-thickness skin grafts after separation of the nails results in nail growth disturbance. Flap coverage of the defect protects nail growth and creates a natural-looking nail fold. Buck­Gramcko published symmetrical aps from the neighboring ngertips [6]. They provide excel­lent results in children with well-developed n-
gertips. However, quite often, there is not enough volume and the author prefers doing asymmetri­cal aps with a transverse Buck-Gramcko ap from one ngertip, asymmetrical longitudinal incisions between the pulps and a simple transla­tion of the pulp on the donor ngertip (Fig.6.7). It is important not to mobilize the fasciocutane­ous adherence extensively to avoid wobbly n­gertips. Sutures on the nail fold should never be tight and small defects that heal secondarily are acceptable.
6.5.1.4 Exposure andSeparation ofNeurovascular Bundles
Dissection in a bloodless eld with a tourniquet allows a good visualization of the neurovascular bundles. In simple syndactylies, the bifurcation of nerves and vessels is usually deep in the web space and does not limit the opening of the web space. In complex syndactylies, such as, for example, in Apert syndrome, one may nd just one interdigital artery with a distal bifurcation that necessitates ligation of one digital artery. Before ligating one branch, one may apply a
Соседние файлы в папке @xirurgi_2025