Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / @xirurgi_2025 / @xirurgi_2025 - 380 - файл

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
47 Мб
Скачать
310
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 29.2 Level of the necrosis in various skin burns is shown. D dermis, (a) supercial dermal burn, (b) deep dermal burn, (c) subdermal burn (Reproduced from Mirko Derganc ed. Present clinical aspects of burns– a symposium. 1968, Slovenia, p.139)
A. Stritar and M. Mikša
a
b
c
In describing the depth of the burn, instead of the three-level American classication (1953), the anatomical classication is more useful. Burns are divided into epidermal, dermal, and subdermal (Derganc 1972) (Fig.29.2) [9].
For important practical reasons, depending on the prognosis and therapy, a distinction must be made between supercial and deep dermal burns in dermal burns. Epidermal and supercial der­mal burns with good capillary rell and with a perceived sense of pain are not a surgical prob­lem. Deep dermal burns and subdermal burns, however, dictate surgical treatment, such as sur­gical removal of dead tissue, usually within the rst ve days after the burn trauma. The localiza­tion of burns is also important, thus distinguish­ing functional areas such as face, neck, feet, shins, genitals, perineum, and mucous mem­branes and non-functional areas such as torso, shoulder, and buttocks. When planning an opera­tion, functional areas have priority.
Regarding the soft tissue status, the surgeon must pay attention to circular burns, where con­sequent edema, especially in children, com­presses the extremity area. This is most often seen in the wrists, elbows, and ankles. Blood ow
should be monitored distally from conception or even surgery should be performed.
At the time of admission, we must be espe­cially careful if a deep burn of “eschara” com­presses the underlying soft tissues and neurovascular structures and thus threateningly increases tissue pressure. In this case, it is imperative to perform an escharotomy to the muscles along typical incision lines. The inci­sion must be complete, with precise hemostasis. Surgically, an incision of the upper extremity, lower extremities, and thoracic incisions is made to establish the respiratory mobility of the thoracic wall. Bronchoscopy is also indicated for respiratory burns that worsen the prognosis of treatment.
29.5 Surgical Treatment ofBurns
The best way to organize the treatment of burns in a larger region is a burn center. Treatment of large burns requires highly qualied personnel and equipment, which is often difcult to pro­vide. Treatment is multidisciplinary, long-lasting, expensive, and with a high disability. Intensive
29 Thermal Burns
https://t.me/medicina_free
treatment of large burns before, during, and after surgery in shock requires a multidisciplinary team, which includes in addition to the surgeon also anesthesiologists, pediatricians, dieticians, intensivists, nephrologists, psychiatrists, and psychologists [10].
The surgery requires an experienced team of surgeons, a complete instrumental team, which can be doubled, and an anesthetic team. Regarding treatment in shock, the doctrines in the larger centers differ, with the burn being treated in some places by surgeons, and in other places by anes­thesiologists or specialist intensivists.
Primary excision in the rst 24 hours is indicated:
1. In subdermal burns, if patients are in good
condition.
2. In electrical burns, in which deep structures
are affected.
3. In combined injuries, in which necrosis is
excised at the site where the incision is required, and the wound after the completed procedure is covered with.
4. Autografts for extensive burns on the extremi-
ties due to the constrictive effect of ESCHAR.
5. In critical burns.
6. In burns that do not respond to anti-shock
therapy.
When organizing the operation, operative teams must be provided, the anesthetist must be informed about the operation and the general condition of the patient. Blood must be ordered and skin must be provided. Substitutes to cover operated sites should be available. The plan of surgery should be clear, due to the location of the patient, excised sites, retrieval sites, additional dressings during surgery, tracheostomy replace­ment, catheters, and organization of additional nursing teams. The participation of the entire team during the operation must be active and coordinated, due to the movement of electrodes and catheters, turning the patient, due to increased blood loss, control of the arterial canal, and due to the risk of hypothermia.
The excision method is consistent with the requirement that only irreversibly damaged tis-
311
Fig. 29.3 Primary tangential excision of burn wound
sue should be removed to the clinically vital sur­face on which the grafts are fully grown. Hemostasis must also be meticulous. If both con­ditions are not met, the grafts do not grow pri­marily and less valuable granulation tissue grows. Excision must be denitive and systematic in the transition from one region to another (Fig.29.3). As a rule, only deep burns are excised in the oper­ative eld. However, supercial burns are excised only exceptionally if there are deep burns in the middle. On the eighth day, all such supercial dermal burns become deeper, due to damage to the wall and the path in the larger veins and irre­versible damage to the collateral circulation. The end result of necrectomy is a clean wound with a vital base, and the biological potential of the excised surface is reduced by 20% (Janžekovič
1977). Such a wound further necrotizes due to dehydration and deepens, so we cover it with grafts. Covering follows immediately after sur­gery or at the latest after 24hours. As a rule, auto­grafts are harvested before excision of the carcass [3, 9].
The only denitive biological cover is its own skin graft (autotransplant), which primarily grows into the defect and to a greater or lesser extent replaces the destroyed skin (Fig.29.4). In insufcient quantities of autografts, we use tem­porary grafts such as cadaver skin (homograft and allograft) and xenografts or heterografts such as semisynthetic dermis and amniotic membranes.
The strategic plan for a large burn (60% of the body surface) would be as follows: In the rst
312
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 29.4 Use of autologous skin graft is the gold stan­dard for surgical management of burns
surgery, a necrectomy of the largest possible area is performed (the limit is blood loss or coagula­tion and the general condition of the patient). Then performed the excised areas with auto­grafts, with functional and esthetically important areas having priority. If there are not enough autografts, we use homotransplants from the skin bank. Before infection and spontaneous lysis of homotransplants occur, which usually occurs after a week to ten days, they are replaced with homotransplants from another donor. Then, grad­ual replacement of homotransplants with auto­grafts takes place, which can be taken several times from the same donor areas at intervals of 7–10days, until the patient is completely covered with his skin.
It should be noted that mesh graft growth is significantly better than a complete graft, due to hematoma drainage. The mesh graft can also be more or less stretched. With the men­tioned technique of creating mesh, stretched skin grafts, we can excise most of the burned area in one to two operations and thus eco­nomically cover the wound with autografts. This prevents the wound from drying out and bacteria from invading.
Even when using laboratory-grown skin, the procedure is similar. After three weeks, when the skin is grown and the wound is covered with it, we do not remove the homographs completely, but serve as a neodermis, or a connective base for the grown keratinocytes. Cultured keratinocytes
A. Stritar and M. Mikša
deposited directly on the vital fatty subcutaneous tissue lyse in a higher percentage.
In recent years, novel technological solutions emerged as alternatives to standard grafting tech­niques. The RECELL® Autologous Cell Harvesting Device (RECELL® System, AVITA Medical, Valencia, CA, US) was developed to minimize the amount of healthy skin to achieve denitive closure of burn injuries. It is developed for point-of-care preparation and application of a suspension of non-cultured, disaggregated, autol­ogous skin cells, using 1cm2 of the patient’s skin to treat up to 80cm2 of excised burn. It can also be used in addition to normal skin grafting in order to maximize results and graft intake [10].
Another technique used to optimize and maxi­mize donor skin to cover large burns is the Meek micrograft technique. Although mentioned in the early 1953, before the invented mesh technique, a young doctor Cicero Parker Meek published using a partial-thickness skin expansion device, called a micrograft. It cut skin to small islets that were later transferred to the wound bed. During this time, the Meek micrograft was forgotten, until the 1990s when it was renewed and improved by doctors in the Netherlands. Nowadays, micrografting can be used when there is poor bed vascularity, such as in patients with diabetes, with a greater success rate due to low metabolic demands [11, 12].
Skin substitutes have important roles in the treatment of dermal and full-thickness wounds, including burns. At present, there is no ideal sub­stitute in the market that provides an effective and scar-free wound healing. Further research should be carried out not only to compare differ­ent skin substitutes but also to evaluate new bio­logical and synthetic materials that can be utilized in wound healing [13].
There have been many interventions using dif­ferent types of stem cells and stem cell-derived products to promote better healing and minimize recipient defects. Even with promising results in experimental studies, there is still a lack of enough published clinical trials to make an infer­ence about the safety and efcacy of stem cells in burn wound care [14].
29 Thermal Burns
https://t.me/medicina_free
313
29.6 Postoperative Care
This is an important part of rehabilitation and is divided into sub-acute, acute, and chronic phases. In the acute phase, treatment of burns is com­bined, using dressings, antibiotics, antiphlogis­tics, and analgesics in supercial burns, and early excision of necrotic skin cover in deep burns (Fig.29.5) [1517].
Physical therapy is essential for a burn patient, starting from the day of injury and lasting for the entire duration of treatment. The aim of physical rehabilitation is to improve the functional inde­pendence of the burn patient by restoring the functional ability of the hand or minimizing the loss thereof. Scar management after sustaining a burn injury is a lengthy process. Among the main physical therapy, assessment procedures are mea­surements of joint mobility, massage, ultrasound therapy, laser therapy, therapeutic exercises for the extremities, and patient education Moore etal. [16].
It is of most importance to start anti­contracture positioning and splinting from day one and continue for many months thereafter.
Positioning is important to inuence tissue length by limiting or inhibiting loss of range of motion secondary to the development of scar tis­sue. Elevation of all limbs affected is necessary in order to quickly reduce edema; hands should be
splinted or positioned and feet kept at 90 degrees, and care and attention must also be given to the heel area, which can quickly develop pressure. Legs should be positioned in a neutral position ensuring that the patient is not externally rotating at the hips [18].
The hand exercise program begins immedi­ately. The active mobilization is rst physiologi­cal, followed by passive mobilization. The exercise therapy is carried out according to a pro­tocol, taking into account the patient’s condition and the burn injury timeline (Moore etal.).
Simultaneously, occupational therapy is included throughout the rehabilitation process in order to prevent deformities and improve the functional status. Occupational therapy includes applying splints, both static and dynamic, moni­toring scar maturation, hydrotherapy, use of oint­ments and creams, applying compression garments and simultaneous education. Passive, static splints have multiple functions, such as immobilization of the affected body part, and maintaining an optimal and functional position. Splints prevent development of contractures. The function of dynamic splints, however, is to regain and restore the affected hand function. Finally, scar management is a function of physiotherapy and occupational therapy, with the goals of reduc­ing hypersensitivity of scars, softening scarred tissues, preventing scars from raising above the
Fig. 29.5 Postoperative care includes vital functions monitoring, uid replacement, medication, and frequent dressing change
314
https://t.me/medicina_free
A. Stritar and M. Mikša
skin level, preventing and reducing contractures, and, nally, psychosocial education with regard to coming to terms with scarred skin (Moore etal.; Callahan etal. 1988; Cowan etal. 2013).
29.7 Conclusion
It is typical for the treatment of burns that the treatment is long-lasting and expensive and that the disability is still very high. The operational technique itself has advanced, as has the instru­mentation. Of course, there are new possibilities in bioengineering, where not only laboratory- grown keratinocytes or semisynthetic dermis but fully cultured skin with dermis, epi­dermis, and derivatives will represent the optimal solution for your own skin graft. Burn surgery is seemingly very simple, but it requires a tremen­dous amount of experience, skills, immediate solutions, anticipation, and timing. Even further reconstructive procedures, after the acute phase, require the complex knowledge of a plastic sur­geon, who thus operationally establishes the entire algorithm of surgical burn therapy.
Good teamwork, careful preparation for sur­gery, professional anesthesia during surgery, and postoperative intensive care are postulates for a good result and survival of a large burn.
Finally, we must not forget the humane and kind attitude toward the burnt patient, who can also be a child and isolated in the room with his anxiety, fear, and pain. The moral support of the surgeon, anesthesiologist, and all employees is irreplaceable for the patient if we want to achieve success in treatment.
References
1. Sneve H.The treatment of burns and skin grafting. J Am Med Assoc. 1906;47(1):1–8.
2. Switzer WE, Sixth National Burn Seminar. Wound management. Use of homografts. J Trauma. 1967;7(1):79–86.
3. Janzekovic Z.The burn wound from the surgical point of view. J Trauma. 1975;15(1):42–62.
4. Brcić A.Primary tangential excision for hand burns.
Hand Clin. 1990;6(2):211–9.
5. Baxter CR. Management of burn wounds. Dermatol Clin. 1993;11(4):709–14.
6. Moore RA, Waheed A, Burns B.Rule of nines. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing;
2021.
7. Lund CC, Browder NC. The estimation of areas of burns. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1944;79:352–8.
8. Chong HP, Quinn L, Jeeves A, et al. A comparison study of methods for estimation of a burn surface area: Lund and Browder, e-burn and Mersey Burns. Burns. 2020;46(2):483–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
burns.2019.08.014.
9. Derganc M. Classifying burns. Br J Plast Surg. 1970;23(3):209–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/
s0007- 1226(70)80043- 1.
10. Holmes JH 4th, Molnar JA, Shupp JW, et al. Demonstration of the safety and effectiveness of the RECELL® system combined with split­thickness meshed autografts for the reduction of donor skin to treat mixed-depth burn injuries. Burns. 2019;45(4):772–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
burns.2018.11.002.
11. Rijpma D, Claes K, Hoeksema H, et al. The meek micrograft technique for burns; review on its out­comes: searching for the superior skin grafting tech­nique. Burns. 2022;48(6):1287–300. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.burns.2022.05.011.
12. Ottomann C, Hartmann B, Branski L, Krohn C.A trib­ute to Cicero Parker meek. Burns. 2015;41(8):1660–
3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.Burns.2015.06.013.
13. Halim AS, Khoo TL, Mohd Yussof SJ. Biologic and synthetic skin substitutes: an overview. Indian J Plast Surg. 2010;43(Suppl):S23–8. https://doi.
org/10.4103/0970- 0358.70712.
14. Abdul Kareem N, Aijaz A, Jeschke MG.Stem cell ther­apy for burns: story so far. Biologics. 2021;15:379–
97. https://doi.org/10.2147/BTT.S259124. Published 2021 Aug 31.
15. Young AW, Dewey WS, King BT.Rehabilitation of burn injuries: an update. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2019;30(1):111–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
pmr.2018.08.004.
16. Cowan AC, Stegink-Jansen CW. Rehabilitation of hand burn injuries: current updates. Injury. 2013;44(3):391–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
injury.2013.01.015.
17. Dodd H, Fletchall S, Starnes C, Jacobson K.Current concepts burn rehabilitation, part II: long-term recov­ery. Clin Plast Surg. 2017;44(4):713–28. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.cps.2017.05.013.
18. Richard R, Baryza MJ, Carr JA, Dewey WS, Dougherty ME, Forbes-Duchart L, etal. Burn reha­bilitation and research: proceedings of a consensus summit. J Burn Care Res. 2009;30:543–73.
Part V
https://t.me/medicina_free
Measurement and Documentation
Imaging andMeasurement
https://t.me/medicina_free
JacopoSecco
30
30.1 Introduction
As in all medicine research elds, the importance of a newly developed solution is measured through the gravity of the problem. Regarding chronic wounds, it is a fact that kin ulcers are a chronic pathological condition affecting around 1–2% of the world’s population [1]. In Europe alone, over four million patients are affected by this syndrome, costing =C4 billion in national health treatment every year. Primarily found in people > 65 years of age (> 60%), skin ulcers are commonly associated with preexisting chronic diseases such as diabetes, vascular problems, heart disease, and obesity [2]. Early detection and assessment of the wound are vital; after four weeks, there is a 30% chance of the lesion never healing, a 50% chance of loss of limb and a 50% chance of mortality in the following 5 years [3].
Chronic pain, reduced mobility, and psycho­logical and emotional stress are just a few of the difculties commonly experienced by patients with this skin condition. Furthermore, treatment of skin ulcers may prove lengthy, taking several months or even years for the wound to heal [4]. In many patients, complications arise that require urgent surgical intervention leading to long peri­ods of hospitalization [5].
J. Secco (*) Department of Electronics and Telecommunications, Politecnico di Torino, Torino, Italy e-mail: jacopo.secco@polito.it
From the presented data, it is clear that there is the need in common clinical practice regarding chronic wounds of tools that can assist the care­givers in delivering the required amount of assis­tance to their patients. A recent study has shown that through the use of medical devices and stan­dardized procedures that helped the physicians and the nurses simply to communicate more ef­ciently, the results of the delivered cures have substantially increased the healing rate from 75% to 90% of the overall cases. The same study has also demonstrated that the same approach has led to a decrease in the cost of cure by 35% due to more precise prescriptions and an increased con­trol of the cure plans [6]. These results are surely encouraging and are the outcome of the last 20 years of research in the eld [7].
From the work of Bekara etal. [7] and from even a more recent review of the new wearable technologies for ulcer management and assess­ment by Wang et al. [8], it is clear that the key­words are essentially two: measure and communicate. Obviously the rst leads to the second, but it also sub-intends another essential requirement: standardization. In this last decade the world of medicine has seen great technologi­cal evolution, not only regarding diagnostic means, but also regarding methods of transmit­ting the information remotely and in a precise fashion. The birth of telemedicine and its con­quest of a fundamental role in future diagnostics and patient care due to the COVID-19 pandemic
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023 M. Maruccia et al. (eds.), Pearls and Pitfalls in Skin Ulcer Management,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-45453-0_30
317
318
https://t.me/medicina_free
J. Secco
taught a valuable lesson not only to the caregiv­ers, but also to the whole hospital management community [9, 10]. In order for this to happen, it is crucial that the information that is gathered from a patient must be extremely precise and complete in order to perform the best possible assessment.
Leading the discussion back to ulcer cure, one of the fundamental milestones that technological assessment has reached is the standardization of the clinical information regarding the assess­ment. Quantication in wound care is a gray area in which many works have been published, but authors have yet to reach a consensus. A number of parameters are measured. The work of Mani etal. remains one of the cornerstones, listing the various measurement possibilities [11]. The pH is intended to be an indicator of tissue repair, considering also its role in the microenvironment of the wound bed [12]. Transcutaneous oxygen and ow at the microcirculatory level are impor­tant, but only as indicators of possible results in terms of tissue vitality. The fact that a skin ulcer has a dened area and volume, although not sim­ply measured, has led many authors to further investigation. For clinicians, the objective of measuring is to be able to better dene the evolu­tion of a wound, whether it is being repaired, blocked, or worsened; Flanagan et al. dene wound reduction parameters as repair indicators [13]. Sheehan et al. have demonstrated that, in the case of diabetic ulcers, early assessment (within four weeks) is crucial for full recovery [3]. Gorin etal. have analyzed the reduction of wound, area, width, and length, and concluded that a linear parameter is independent of the geo­metric shape of the wound [14]. Cukjati et al. reiterate how wound area and its variations indi­cate evolution and prognostics [15].
Moreover, the percentage change of the wound area is a clinically recognized prognostic mea­sure, although the problem remains of how to measure it [16, 17]. Wound area is not the only prognostic indicator. Solutions have been devel­oped that propose a subdivision of the lesions— in terms of tissue type and exudate management—may be considered an appropriate indicator of clinical results. One of the most com-
monly used is the wound bed preparation (WBP) score proposed by Falanga as an analysis param­eter as it is well-known and used on different types of wounds [18].
As shown, ulcer assessment can take into account many different variables, and an accurate relation among them can surely lead to an always more complete wound classication in diagnostic terms. In any case as mentioned by Khoo etal. and by Haghpanah et al., the capability to per­form a correct morphological measurement of the wound and its variations in its healing process is one of the key elements for a correct diagnosis. In these terms, the evolution of wound treatment techniques has been followed by a parallel evolu­tion of the imaging and measurement devices for wound treatment [19]. Just in the last ten years, different solutions have been developed, trialed, and brought to the market, entering one by one in the standard procedures for wound treatment, always increasing their efciency and precision. The following sections will deliver an overview of both imaging and measurement techniques used in wound care nowadays, due to their proven diagnostic signicance. The devices and the pro­cedures that are here described set the actual standard of cure and show a glimpse of the future of this always developing eld. The nal goal is to give a better understanding of the future of wound assessment and how technology can help the caregivers, which are always working in the front line, to render an always higher standard of cure meeting the ongoing life and social requirements.
30.2 Overview ofImaging
Technology inWound Care
In order to measure something, it is necessary rst to feel it, or even better, to see it. Historically, seeing something under the skin has been one of the major problems to overcome. At rst physi­cians were obliged to look for different symp­toms by touching the patient, searching for cutaneous eruptions, rashes, or wounds, or even to auscultate the body by laying the naked year on the patient’s skin. These methods were the
30 Imaging andMeasurement
https://t.me/medicina_free
319
only available until the eighteenth century for obvious reasons. The main, and probably the only, reason was that it was thought to be unnec­essarily dangerous to cut open the skin to simply look inside the body unless no other solution was possible. As a matter of fact, instant cauterization techniques such as the electric scalpel did not exist until the 1920s. For this reason, the rst studies of the human anatomy and physiology in Europe were conducted by dissecting dead bod­ies. Moreover, the rst anatomists also had to have an outstanding artistic talent since all their observations had been hand-drawn for future studies. Two of the most famous artists and anat­omists lived between the end of the fteenth cen­tury and the rst half of the sixteenth century were Andreas von Wesel (a.k.a. Andreas Vesalius) and Leonardo da Vinci, whose some of their stud­ies arrived to us as true pieces of artwork (two examples of Leonardo’s anatomical work are shown in Fig.30.1).
In the eighteen-hundreds, two major discover­ies gave birth to what today we call medical imaging. The rst was the invention of photogra­phy in 1827 by Nicéphore Niépce in collabora­tion with Louis Jacques Mandé Daguerre. The
second was the invention of X-ray tube by Wilhelm Rontgen. The evolution of these tech­niques has led to the birth of the eld medical imaging. This eld has become so popular and so important that it is reported that by 2010 around 5 billion medical imaging studies have been con­ducted worldwide, and it is estimated that by 2020 these have increased by 10% [20].
Medical imaging started have a greater differ­entiation between its morphological and func­tional purposes with the advent of digital images in the 1990s. At rst, all imaging techniques, not only in the medicine eld, were analog. This meant that the resulting image from a camera, an X-ray machine or whatever imaging device, imprinted directly the subject of the representa­tion on a portable physical mean. Common cam­eras used lm rolls made of celluloid, same as the X-ray machines that initially exploited celluloid lms with silver ions that had a direct reaction with the ionizing radiation passing through a body. Digitalization permitted to convert the image in a series of bits (i.e., digits, 0s and 1s) through silicon-based sensors. The obtained data can be easily stored in semiconductor-based memories such as the memory of an electronic
Fig. 30.1 Two examples of Leonardo da Vincis’s ana­tomical work. It is known that the famous Italian artist used to buy corpses from the dead person’s families in
order to dissect them and draw their observations. Among the many interests of Leonardo was also medicine at his arbors
320
https://t.me/medicina_free
J. Secco
device and can be directly analyzed using both simple and complex mathematical models. The capability of digital images to be both visualized and analyzed has increased the functionality of medical imaging. For instance, a defect detected from an analog X-ray image could not be easily measured in its size, and comparisons of the same defect detected from two different X-ray machines could not be easily performed unless the same defect presented great variations. On the other hand, thanks to the computerized tomography (CT) which is a digital X-ray machine capable of scanning the whole body dividing it into slices, it is possible to digitally reconstruct in 3D the same defect measuring it in all its dimensions. From a time development per­spective, parting from the point that a rst digital transformation of medical imaging devices occurred, the spectrum of functionalities that can be achieved through medical imaging devices has become exponentially greater (an example is shown in Fig.30.2).
In wound care, obviously, imaging serves as a
powerful tool not only in representing the wound
per se, but also aiding the physicians and nurses to have a better understanding of the ulcer evolu­tion. As mentioned in Sect. 30.1, wound care spe­cialists have a need for more efcient instruments and devices in order to correctly capture the fea­tures of the lesion. These features are different and not always visible to the naked eye. Digital imaging aids the specialists in different ways, depending on the clinical parameters that are needed to be gathered. Not all the imaging tech­niques are commonly used in this particular eld of medicine due to several factors such as the eti­ology of the wound, the presence of required equipment, and the actual need of distinguishing different clinical features. In any case, all the means that are nowadays used permit physicians and nurses to perform specic and precise mea­surements and analysis increasing the standard of care and consequently its healing efcacy. As mentioned, depending on researched clinical fea­ture, different technologies can be exploited. These can be subdivided into two main groups that will be treated in more detail in the following subsections: optical and nonoptical imaging.
Fig. 30.2 A time functionality development graph with different examples of imaging techniques. From the advent of digital imaging, the diagnostic functionalities that can be obtained from an image have increased expo­nentially. As shown in the gure, traditional X-ray images
have been the state of the art of diagnostics for many years: By converting the image into digital form, imaging devices can perform complex analysis directly on the obtained data.
Соседние файлы в папке @xirurgi_2025